Avsnitt

  • Welcome to the series finale! After more than six years, we are concluding the Unfiltered Finance podcast. It has been our sincere pleasure to inform both our investors, and financial advisors with this offering. Joining our host Tom Romano, for this proverbial curtain call, is Casey Dylan, Consultant from Story Market Services & the original host of Unfiltered Finance. We’ll be recalling some of our favorite memories, and discussing what this podcast has meant to the progression of our respective careers.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • Welcome to part two of our podcast episode - "Navigating Global Markets". Many investment professionals believe it is imperative for investors to globally diversify their portfolios, and not put all of their proverbial eggs into one basket. We are joined by Symmetry's Brendan Kruh, Investment Associate, to conclude our discussion on the necessity of global diversification in your investments.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    Opinions and views expressed on this podcast were current on the date recorded. Opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, including any forward-looking estimates or statements which are based on certain expectations and assumptions. Although information and opinions given have been obtained from or based on sources believed to be reliable, no warranty or representation is made as to their correctness, completeness, or accuracy. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for everyone. This podcast does not identify all the risks (direct or indirect) or other considerations which might be material to you when entering any financial transaction. Please visit the Symmetry Partners website for important disclosure related to performance of any specific index quoted in this podcast.

  • Saknas det avsnitt?

    Klicka här för att uppdatera flödet manuellt.

  • With recent turmoil in the Middle East, the continued war in Ukraine, and global inflation, investors want their portfolios to feature more U.S. stocks. After all, domestic investments have performed well as of late. In this episode of Unfiltered Finance we are joined once again, by Symmetry's Brendan Kruh, Investment Associate, for a discussion on the need for global diversification, even during the most tumultuous times.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    Opinions and views expressed on this podcast were current on the date recorded. Opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, including any forward-looking estimates or statements which are based on certain expectations and assumptions. Although information and opinions given have been obtained from or based on sources believed to be reliable, no warranty or representation is made as to their correctness, completeness, or accuracy. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for everyone. This podcast does not identify all the risks (direct or indirect) or other considerations which might be material to you when entering any financial transaction. Please visit the Symmetry Partners website for important disclosure related to performance of any specific index quoted in this podcast.

  • Rising oil prices have animated market participant’s fears of reinvigorated inflation pressures, increasing the chances that the Federal Reserve will impose more interest rate hikes. Join Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Investment Communications Strategist (Consultant), and Tom Romano our Head of Strategic Relationships & Product Development, for a detailed recap of some notable market events from Q3 of this year.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • Markets were off to one of the best start in decades during the first half of 2023—then came the third quarter. The Federal Reserve resumed increasing rates, bringing them to a 22-year high at the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting at the end of July. This led to ongoing elevated interest rates through August, pushing bond yields higher and challenging lofty equity valuations. In this episode, Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Investment Communications Strategist (Consultant), and Tom Romano our Head of Strategic Relationships & Product Development, will provide timely insights, and analysis, on market activity from around the world this financial quarter. We will also discuss what this could mean for long-term term investors.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • "KEEP CALM AND CARRY ON." Not only is this a beloved motto, it's also a great rule of thumb for maintaining your portfolio allocations. Once again, we are joined by Symmetry's Brendan Kruh, Investment Associate, and Eide Bailly Wealth’s Brett Myer, CFA, CIMA®, Investment Strategy Director. In this second of two episodes, we'll be discussing why you should maintain growth and value positions during periods of market instability.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • Once again, investors are faced with the same debate. Should I invest my money in large scale growth companies (e.g. Apple, Google), or, should I keep faith in the little guy and invest in some smaller companies (that seem poised to grow over time)? In this episode of Unfiltered Finance, we are thrilled to host not just one, but two special guests; our very own Brendan Kruh, Investment Associate, and Eide Bailly Wealth’s Brett Myer, CFA, CIMA®, Investment Strategy Director. Together, we’ll discuss present trends around both value stocks and growth stocks. Spoiler alert, it’s a more complex topic than you might think.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • There is risk involved in trying to time markets. We believe it's best to apply multiple decades of research when making investment decisions. Today we are joined by Symmetry's Dr. John B. McDermott, Executive Director of Investments, to conclude our discussion about Evidence-Based investing. This episode will feature a detailed overview of the resources available to investors (who are curious to learn more) and the academic professionals who have helped to develop this investment strategy over decades of time.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • This week, we work to define evidence-based investing, and explain some of the potential benefits of using this strategy. In part one of this two-part episode, our own Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships and Product Development, is joined by Dr. John B. McDermott, Executive Director of Investments, for a historical retrospective on this fastidious investment approach.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • In this final installment discussing Q2 of 2023, we dive into current events, and their potential effects on the Stock Market. Our hosts, Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships & Product Development and Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Consultant sit down for a discussion of the "magnificent seven" growth stock winners, the current state of inflation, interest rates, heavily tilted tech stocks, changes among international markets, and the recent repeal of the Black Sea grain deal by Russia.

    Click here to watch the full Quarter-in-Perspective on YouTube.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • Despite a somewhat lackluster April and May, equities markets ended one of the better first halves of a year in quite some time by the end of June. The Nasdaq, S&P 500, and Dow were up 32.32%, 16.89%, and 4.94% for the year, respectively. It was the Nasdaq’s best first half of a year since 1983, primarily due to growth in tech stocks driven by the surge in artificial intelligence. In this first of two parts, we discuss quarterly returns for Q2 2023. Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Consultant, and Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships and Product Development, will provide timely insights and analysis on what happened in markets and economies around the world in the second quarter and what this means for long-term term investors.

    Click here to watch the full Quarter-in-Perspective on YouTube.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.
  • Two weeks ago, we held another successful week of AdvisorFest - an annual, week-long live-streaming event where we cover some of the most pressing issues Financial Advisors are presently facing. This year, we decided to host a live panel discussion about the experiences women have when creating long-term financial plans, and asserting an equal amount of authority in the handling of their household finances.

    Our very own Andrea Loin, Associate Director of Marketing, led a discussion along with financial advisors Diana Bacon, CFP®, CDFA®, MBA, and Joyce Bloomquist, CDFA®, of Apella Wealth. You’ll find some genuinely moving stories of challenges faced, and overcome by women investors here. We hope you find this episode to be insightful. Enjoy.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice. Transcript:

    00:00:07:01 - 00:00:37:17
    Speaker 1
    Hello and welcome back to Unfiltered Finance. I'm your host, Tom Romano. Two weeks ago, we held another successful week of Advisor Fest, an annual week long live streaming event where we cover some of the most pressing issues financial advisors are facing today. In part one of this special episode on Women investors, our very own Andrea Loin associate director of marketing, leads a discussion along with financial advisers Diana Bacon and Joyce Blomquist of Apollo Wealth will discuss some cautionary tales that can help investors learn which mistakes to avoid on their financial journey.

    00:00:37:19 - 00:00:41:09
    Speaker 1
    We hope you find this episode to be insightful. Enjoy.

    00:00:41:11 - 00:01:06:15
    Speaker 2
    Welcome everyone to the final session of our third Annual Advisor fest. Empowering Women Investors Navigating Financial Success Together. We're thrilled to have you here today as we embark on a journey to explore empowerment of women in the world of investing. During this webinar, we want to shed light on the unique perspectives and experiences of women investors and provide practical insights on how to effectively engage and support this growing demographic.

    00:01:06:16 - 00:01:30:05
    Speaker 2
    Graphic It's important that we promote awareness and understanding of the specific challenges and opportunities faced by women investors in doing this, we hope to foster an inclusive environment and equip advisors like yourselves with the knowledge and tools to better serve women investors, which will ultimately lead to their financial success and empowerment. I have with me two financial advisors that work with Capella wealth, one of our sister firms.

    00:01:30:05 - 00:01:44:08
    Speaker 2
    We have Diana Bacon. She's a CFP and a CDPHE and she has years of experience working in this very wonderful demographic. And we've Joyce Bloomquist, who is a cafe as well, also an advisor with Pell Wealth. Welcome.

    00:01:44:09 - 00:01:47:00
    Speaker 3
    Thank you. Glad to be here today.

    00:01:47:01 - 00:02:07:21
    Speaker 2
    Thank you for joining us. I read a statistic in doing research for this whole thing that really it surprised me because I'm a woman. I work in an investment firm. So I just assume I know all there is to know, but I don't. So about 39% of women have no retirement strategy. That seems like a very high number to me.

    00:02:07:21 - 00:02:29:11
    Speaker 2
    So I looked it up and I was like, So what percentage of men don't have a retirement strategy? And it's only 25%. So there's a big gap there. It was shocking to me. And then I just assumed, right, we're in the 2023. Things should be the same for everybody, but they're not. And so coming together to discuss how do we to we do we grow that number or actually shrink that number down to be less.

    00:02:29:11 - 00:02:46:17
    Speaker 2
    We want more women to have a plan for retirement. So, Diana, what are some strategies that you have that you use when addressing women investors with the challenges that are faced by them? How do you give them tools and tips and tricks to help them close that gap?

    00:02:46:21 - 00:03:19:05
    Speaker 3
    Women in general, and you know, this is not some little niche. This is a huge market segment. We are 51% of the population To say women are all like X is very decent, enormous. However, we do see continuing themes over and over. The first is women. And we were raised this way, especially in the Western world. Well, actually, I would say while we're global globally, we never put ourselves first.

    00:03:19:05 - 00:03:42:02
    Speaker 3
    And when I hear the statistic of the number of women who don't have a retirement plan, what do you have to do to have a retirement plan? You have to save. You have to invest. You have to be thoughtful of yourself. Make sure you either have that income stream or the assets to support you. And so the first thing that I work with a client is to change their money mindset.

    00:03:42:04 - 00:03:48:22
    Speaker 3
    They need to put themselves first. I'm going to use the S-word. We got to be selfish.

    00:03:49:00 - 00:03:53:12
    Speaker 2
    And that's really hard. Especially especially for me. I would have a hard time doing that.

    00:03:53:14 - 00:04:12:17
    Speaker 3
    And it is. Yeah, yeah. I mean, think about it. Like having to say, I'm going to give my adult kids less as they're launching in life, but I want to do all this for them. I love them. You know, I have nurtured them, but I'm going to do less for them because I have to do for me for that.

    00:04:12:17 - 00:04:32:05
    Speaker 3
    You know, I want to save for their college so they don't have to go through the things I did. All those things are prioritizing yourself. That is extremely difficult for women. So they got to start in that word, start to be selfish, and then get away with the H word shame.

    00:04:32:10 - 00:04:46:18
    Speaker 4
    That is such a good point. I love it because I'm in this open space now. My kids are 20 and 22 and they see when do we let them go and be adults and when do we start saving like we should for.

    00:04:46:18 - 00:05:01:11
    Speaker 3
    Ourselves that say And so many women start off because we have some credit card debt or paid too much on our car loan or, you know, just all these things that come up and we just put that shame on ourselves and then we don't deal with our finances.

    00:05:01:13 - 00:05:19:10
    Speaker 2
    I like that you put the shame part of that and getting rid of the shame because I think being selfish is hard enough. But then you start to feel bad when you start to look at things. For me, it was matching my 41k, right? I'm like, Well, that takes away from money coming into the family. And and then I started realizing, No, it doesn't.

    00:05:19:12 - 00:05:27:00
    Speaker 2
    It helps the long run. I'm doing it for me. I have to watch out for myself. So taking the shame out of it, that's probably harder than being selfish, to be honest.

    00:05:27:02 - 00:05:32:18
    Speaker 4
    Yeah, We're caregivers, right? That's where we're moms, first and foremost. And it's hard to let that go. Yep.

    00:05:32:21 - 00:05:51:13
    Speaker 2
    Caregivers is a good thing. Diana, your you did a webinar recently on closing that career, the career change and how to approach that career change. And I thought it was a great webinar. Not a lot of women think about that when they're leaving the workforce. I left for a couple of years, went back and not a lot of women think about what happens when you go back.

    00:05:51:13 - 00:06:04:12
    Speaker 2
    And I think your webinar really opened up, you know, how to get back into the game and then how to be, again, selfish, how to focus on you to put yourself in a better space in life, in a better spot when you're trying to get back into the game.

    00:06:04:14 - 00:06:32:12
    Speaker 3
    That's another area to that employment because so many women are underemployed to better support the family. Mm hmm. And the shame of saying, No, I want to do this. I want to have more of my earnings, particularly if, say, maybe your marriage or partnership isn't as steady and strong. The first thing when people are like, oh, I'm taking it, or when women are thinking about getting divorced, I'm like, Get a job or get a better job right now.

    00:06:32:14 - 00:06:33:15
    Speaker 4
    Don't wait.

    00:06:33:17 - 00:06:36:02
    Speaker 3
    Don't wait. Do it right now.

    00:06:36:04 - 00:06:53:06
    Speaker 2
    See how that goes back to that, that shame and that self. Right. And be something I would find hard to do. But my husband is that I am what he calls the breadwinner of the family. And he tells all of his friends about it. And for me, that when I started to take on more, I felt like I was letting my family down.

    00:06:53:12 - 00:07:09:06
    Speaker 2
    Right. You have to make that choice. And I realized I wasn't financially. I was helping my family, my 41k is growing, our family's growing, his 41k is growing. We're all working together. But I had to focus on me and make sure that I did that side of it, too. You actually hit on a great topic, Diana, and Joyce.

    00:07:09:06 - 00:07:33:08
    Speaker 2
    I'm going to I'm going to start with you on this one. But a lot of the marriages might not be as solid, right? So I was divorced young and didn't even know that there was an option for me as far as financial planning goes. But can you explain how you would approach addressing the potential impact of divorce or even what would a heart a change in a lot of part of a big part of your life on a woman's financial situation?

    00:07:33:10 - 00:07:48:12
    Speaker 2
    What makes it unique and different for that? Because I didn't even know what a CDF was until about five years ago and realizing that as someone who went through divorce, I could have had someone helping me too because I didn't realize what I was going through was unique.

    00:07:48:14 - 00:08:09:02
    Speaker 4
    Right. And I have some input on that. You know, I've been through a divorce, too, and I think some of the things that are hard to wrap your arms around are when you're starting, you're kind of going from being with a partner to being by yourself. I mean, I think Diana's first point out of, you know, get back to work if you can and if it's possible, you know, we we want that to be the ultimate goal for the person.

    00:08:09:04 - 00:08:26:07
    Speaker 4
    Why? It might not seem like you're making much at the time. I mean, maybe you got daycare costs and all that and maybe a lot of that money's going to their daycare costs and there's things in your mind or maybe you're saying, why am I even doing this? I mean, when I'm actually take it home isn't much after I pay all these people, but you're participating in Social Security.

    00:08:26:07 - 00:08:53:19
    Speaker 4
    So that's important. You probably get your own health care. That's important, and that might make all the difference in the world by stepping into the workforce. At that point, you got to start accumulating those things for yourself. At this point when you go from where to me. And so that's something to really consider. Might not seem like you're bringing home that much, but you are benefiting from the benefits from the workplace, maybe for one K, maybe some free matching as little as you can contribute to the plan.

    00:08:54:00 - 00:09:01:20
    Speaker 4
    There might be some pre matching that you need to consider as all these things are so important to get started back to you when you're going through that process.

    00:09:01:23 - 00:09:24:07
    Speaker 2
    Makes perfect sense. And as an advisor, how do you educate not just women going through these these life changes, but how do you educate women on things that they need to know about their financial, about their finances, about that for one K, about going back to work? And though you think you're not making an impact with what you're making because it may be less than you want to at the time, how do you educate them?

    00:09:24:07 - 00:09:35:01
    Speaker 2
    What are their tools and resources out there for them? Are there ways that you approach it that are different than you would, you know, approach a normal planning client? Are there tools of resources for them?

    00:09:35:03 - 00:09:59:21
    Speaker 3
    I found that women are not educated when we're growing up on money matters the same way that men are. So first is getting the basics and we have the Internet now. So Internet and podcasts are wonderful. So it's like learning a new language. You have to just start jump in. There's a certain lingo to it, so you need to pick that up.

    00:10:00:03 - 00:10:31:07
    Speaker 3
    So starting to listen to podcasts, you might not understand much. The first few try a bunch of them buying a new pair of jeans. You got to make sure it's a fit, you know, try ones. Once you hear things over and over again, will start to click, go on financial websites, read, you know, nerdwallet, Wikipedia, you know, all of these things where you can just start to learn the lingo and then talk to your friends.

    00:10:31:09 - 00:11:13:21
    Speaker 3
    Men are talking to each other about money. We need, again, a sage word shame. Women don't want to talk about money. They don't want to make. They don't want to feel bad that they don't know something. But many women have found that financial services providers can be a little condescending. And that and that's a real struggle. And once you've been spoken down to getting that courage up again, to put yourself out there and ask questions and feel like someone's going to think you're you're not intelligent because you don't know, but how would you know if you never learned it or or.

    00:11:13:21 - 00:11:27:23
    Speaker 4
    If you weren't married? And maybe the husband had it with his responsibility to take care of the finances. And maybe now you're by yourself, You're maybe you're divorced, or maybe you're widowed, and now it's all on you. So where do I start over with all this?

    00:11:28:01 - 00:11:48:16
    Speaker 3
    Yeah. I've sat down with widows who are like, I don't even know where our checkbook is. I don't know how the, like, bill gets paid. I mean, all of these things where they really put it off on someone else, I will say, being involved in your finances, looking at your tax return, a lot of people don't even look at that.

    00:11:48:16 - 00:12:10:17
    Speaker 3
    Look at your tax return. And I am absolutely biased. I will admit it. I'm a financial advisor. I am a certified financial planner. And I think working with a planner as early as you find one that suits you is really a big step in that.

    00:12:10:19 - 00:12:28:00
    Speaker 1
    Thank you very much for joining us today. If you're a financial professional and you'd like to learn more, check the link in this episode's description to view all of the presentations from Advisor Fest 2023. As always, you can listen to all of our past episodes anywhere you get your podcasts. Thank you very much and we'll see you soon.

    00:12:28:01 - 00:12:52:19
    Speaker 5
    Cemetery Partners LLC is an investment advisor firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered or excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment advisor does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission.

    00:12:52:21 - 00:13:22:18
    Speaker 5
    No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss due to various factors, including changing market conditions and or applicable laws. The content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.

    00:13:22:20 - 00:13:38:13
    Speaker 5
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of or is a substitute for personalized investment advice.

  • Today we conclude our discussion on women investors from AdvisorFest 2023. Symmetry's Andrea Loin, Associate Director of Marketing, leads a discussion along with financial advisors Diana Bacon, CFP®, CDFA®, MBA, and Joyce Bloomquist, CDFA® of Apella Wealth, on some of the critical factors, and life experiences, that should be incorporated into a woman's financial plan.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice. Symmetry Partners and Apella Wealth are affiliated entities. Transcript:

    00;00;00;00 - 00;00;37;05
    Unknown
    Hello and welcome back to Unfiltered Finance. I'm Tom Romano. Your host today, Andrea Line, assistant director of marketing, concludes our discussion on women investors with Dianna Bacon and Joyce Blomquist Financial Advisors with a paella wealth. You'll find some sage advice here for women who are working to assert their financial independence and plan for the future. Enjoy. If I'm an advisor working with several women investors, what are some tips that you could give them to starting that initial and being that that advisor?

    00;00;37;05 - 00;01;00;06
    Unknown
    You set it right there. Don't be condescending. What kind of tips would you give to an advisor working with this demographic, say, you know, joint? I mean, it's hard, right? Because you could be a male advisor trying to reach out to the women's group. Absolutely. So but you're probably less likely to join the women's community groups. That might be awkward, but definitely if you're a female advisor, get involved in the community with some of the community groups.

    00;01;00;06 - 00;01;16;28
    Unknown
    Even if you're a male advisor and you want to reach out to the women's group and help out, you know, it doesn't have to necessarily be all women's group. There's going to be women who are participating in these community groups. I say branch out in your community and see what kind of groups are related to investments, and maybe that's a good start.

    00;01;16;29 - 00;01;37;16
    Unknown
    Webinars. I mean, we have our webinar that we've been doing periodically, and I think we've gotten a really great group of people and they're not all women. We have a lot of men that join our groups too. So I think if you're you're spreading the word out there, you might be casting a wide net too to both groups, but you know, everyone's listening.

    00;01;37;16 - 00;01;58;19
    Unknown
    And so maybe it's not just a niche of just women, but they're part of that group can see that there is some understanding and they don't feel intimidated to come in and talk to you. And I think that's what's most important is that making them feel comfortable, because I know that even when I see married couples come in to our offices, you can tell right away the women's fair, the woman is very quiet.

    00;01;58;20 - 00;02;17;13
    Unknown
    Maybe the man's taking over the whole meeting. You can tell immediately really who has been doing the finances there. So really try to communicate with that spouse in that meeting and say, hey, you're part of this. What do you have? What's your input on this? But and then, you know, sometimes they're surprised and they they look at me like, oh, gosh, I really don't participate in this.

    00;02;17;13 - 00;02;42;21
    Unknown
    I'm just here to listen. But making them feel part of the conversation is so key. And pulling on one of the threads that Joyce touched on. One of the best things to do, particularly if you want to go into this, you're worried about sounding condescending because we know most advisors are men. Depending on what portion of the industry you're looking at, it's either, you know, 23% are women, 18% are women.

    00;02;42;23 - 00;03;09;14
    Unknown
    CFP, CFA. So make sure you're talking with them and not to them. Don't talk at them, pull them into the conversation. The best way to find out what their knowledge level is is to be having the conversation going through the accounts. They're going through a tax return, walking them through some of it. They might know, some of it they might not.

    00;03;09;16 - 00;03;31;05
    Unknown
    But if you're in a real true conversation, you're using your listening skills, you're keeping your mouth shut a good bit and letting them speak, that that's the first way to get into this area. I couldn't agree more. And people love stories, right? They love to know that you've been through the same things that maybe they have. It makes you real.

    00;03;31;05 - 00;03;47;20
    Unknown
    They mentioned a divorce. Hey, you know, I went through a divorce. Sorry to hear that. You did, too. Immediately they connect with you. Maybe that's a story that can relate to them. They know you've had that real life experience. And so they can really relate to that situation and and maybe open up a little bit more towards you.

    00;03;47;22 - 00;04;07;11
    Unknown
    Yeah, women are emotional. We make decisions on emotions. And I personally, when I picked my financial advisor, it was a connection I had. It wasn't, you know, they, they listened to me, Diana, They, they heard me. And I was not educated before. I didn't always work in this industry and I wasn't educated, but they didn't make me feel uneducated.

    00;04;07;12 - 00;04;25;24
    Unknown
    I don't know everything, so I don't want you to make me feel bad for not knowing everything. So when I met with a financial advisor the first time, that was exactly what it was. It was emotional connection. You know, this is somebody you're telling things you may not tell anyone else in your life. You know, monetary stuff is still taboo, you know, And I wanted a connection.

    00;04;25;24 - 00;04;53;24
    Unknown
    So you're totally right there. One of the things there's a lot of inequalities, right, that are still out there. How do you address those? There's gender specific issues, the pay gap, the career breaks, the caregiving responsibilities in that financial plan. So how do you take that? Because there was a stat that I read, it kind of made me sick to my stomach, but it was on average women experience an $80,000 lifetime pay gap when compared to men.

    00;04;53;25 - 00;05;18;03
    Unknown
    That's various factors that are, you know, controlled by controlling that. But there is a huge gap. How do you account for that in your financial plan for them? Do you account for that or do we just go by their plan and specific to them? Anyone working with women, if you're working with any marginalized group and in some areas women are marginalized, you need to address those specific issues with that group.

    00;05;18;03 - 00;05;45;23
    Unknown
    I am a strong believer that an advisor you have to not deal with gender generalities, but that client. So and I'm going to stay on that marginalize. If you are working with a woman of queer woman. Now that pay group gap has just expanded to women of color. Again, that gap has expanded less opportunities. We can we can put on our rose colored glasses and pretend like that doesn't happen, but it absolutely does.

    00;05;45;23 - 00;06;10;13
    Unknown
    And we know because we hear it from our friends, we see it with our clients, it's happening in real time. So not only do you want to look at that decreased salary, likely decrease raises, you want to adjust for that in any long term cash flow. Also increase spending. Mothers are more likely to help their adult children financially.

    00;06;10;15 - 00;06;40;19
    Unknown
    They're more likely to be burdened with. Not that it's a burden, but it is on time and resources with caring for parents, which means less time to work, less flexibility. And sometimes you cost on them, especially with the mother, because we know that aging women retire with less assets. I mean, all these statistics are so disheartening. I mean, I get to an area when you're like, I want to read anymore, I want to stick my head in the sand.

    00;06;40;22 - 00;07;04;18
    Unknown
    Yeah, you're right, Diane. At 95% of women at some point will be their families. Primary financial decision maker. We have we live longer. Our longevity is there. Many times we will outlive our husbands and be alone. These aren't just divorces. These are. This is widowhood. Later in life, many reasons why at some point in our lives we will be the primary financial decision maker.

    00;07;04;20 - 00;07;26;17
    Unknown
    These are important things to talk about. And in the long term plan, I have children health care costs that go along with having children. Your body changes and your health care costs increase. Do you do you incorporate that into the plan? Woman is going to have a family. I know it's not necessarily as big of an issue as you know before, but health care costs are going to be huge for for females.

    00;07;26;18 - 00;07;52;21
    Unknown
    Yeah, there's going to be an extra health care cost. Do you include that? Do you think of that in the plan? One thing I do in it is that a personal hard subject, but when I am working with a younger professional single woman, I ask what her fertility plans are. Oh, cause I am seeing a great deal of women.

    00;07;52;21 - 00;08;26;06
    Unknown
    Now you say I make great money. I don't. I don't need a partner. You're absolutely right. There have been single mothers since the beginning of time, and a will always happen. But that means you have to have a plan, adoption, you know, whatever they're going to do. Financial. Now you are the only caregiver for that child. So now we have more stress on life insurance.

    00;08;26;09 - 00;08;59;21
    Unknown
    You know, estate planning, guardianship. So it's not just the, you know, the increased costs. I have teenagers. Yes, I know that. Braces and broken ankles and broken wrist and yeah, all of that. So we do have those increased cost, but it's also I see more single women than men deciding on their parenthood as single people in the financial side of that is huge.

    00;08;59;21 - 00;09;25;16
    Unknown
    And that is an area where we're not only affecting the lives and providing value for that woman, but also for her future children and ensuring their security. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. Any other? I appreciate you both jumping on. And couple of times we've referenced the series that Diana and Joyce are both a part of at Capella. It's the Financial Independence for Women series.

    00;09;25;16 - 00;09;45;12
    Unknown
    You can find it on our Web site at Palo Health.com if you're interested. You know, take a listen. They have some great topics on there that are not just for women, but that will definitely help drive home some some great points. So take a look and take a listen. And I do appreciate you both jumping on as we conclude.

    00;09;45;12 - 00;10;08;05
    Unknown
    We hope that you as advisors have gain valuable insights into working with women investors by recognizing their unique perspectives, addressing their specific needs, and fostering that inclusive environment that we talked about. You can create a future where women investors thrive and they contribute to the growth and stability of the global economy and hopefully shrink some of those statistics that we started out with in the beginning of this, this webinar.

    00;10;08;05 - 00;10;31;10
    Unknown
    So if you have any questions, we can take a few questions for Joyce and Diana right now. I wanted to make one quick comment. Andrea. You had said that women make decisions emotionally. That's actually not been my experience. Oh, women do cling on to their fear much more than men, so that might stop them from taking first steps.

    00;10;31;17 - 00;10;57;18
    Unknown
    But I find women to be very pragmatic. And for advisors who are going to be working with women, expect the why? Why am I doing this? Why is that? V There I find that as women become educated and on their finances, they're happy to dig in, but they want to know why and they want every pass to be explained to them so that they know they're getting value for that dollar.

    00;10;57;19 - 00;11;28;06
    Unknown
    I've always found women extremely pragmatic. Yeah, that makes sense. I'm detail oriented. I want to know the down in the weeds information. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. So yeah. So make sure make sure you're ready to answer those questions, especially the single moms. Yep. And they know how to balance time and and figure out every little loophole they can to do their time and manage it well.

    00;11;28;06 - 00;11;51;11
    Unknown
    So while I do appreciate both Diana and Joyce joining us today and look forward to working with you all more in the future, thank you very much for joining us today. If you're a financial professional and you'd like to learn more, check the link in this episode's description to view all of the presentation from Advisor Fest 2023. As always, you can listen to all of our past episodes anywhere you get your podcasts.

    00;11;51;18 - 00;12;18;15
    Unknown
    Thank you very much and we'll see you soon. Cemetery Partners LLC is an investment advisor firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered or excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment advisor does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission.

    00;12;18;17 - 00;12;48;14
    Unknown
    No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment investment strategy, product or non investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss due to various factors, including changing market conditions and or applicable laws. The content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.

    00;12;48;16 - 00;13;10;06
    Unknown
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of or is a substitute for personalized investment advice. Symmetry Partners and APL Wealth are affiliated entities.

  • Financial Advisors don't work for free. Depending on how their practice is structured, investors will be charged an assortment of fees for a financial advisor's services. In this episode of Unfiltered Finance, we are joined by JT Lavery, Symmetry's Associate Director of National Sales, to discuss how fees are structured and how advisors can work to be transparent with their clientele.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    0
    00:00:06.970 --> 00:00:10.520
    Hello and welcome to Unfiltered Finance. This is your host, Tom Romano.

    1
    00:00:10.520 --> 00:00:13.640
    And thank you all for joining us for, uh, this edition.

    2
    00:00:13.930 --> 00:00:16.320
    Today we're gonna talk about something that I think, uh,

    3
    00:00:16.620 --> 00:00:21.160
    weighs on a lot of investors' minds. Um, there, there tends to be, uh,

    4
    00:00:21.400 --> 00:00:24.320
    somewhat of a lack of transparency on this topic in the industry.

    5
    00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:28.400
    And the topic is, is fees and all fees associated with investing.

    6
    00:00:28.460 --> 00:00:32.400
    We have the perfect guest for us here today. Uh, JT Lavery, uh,

    7
    00:00:32.400 --> 00:00:34.040
    longtime coworker and friend of mine.

    8
    00:00:34.070 --> 00:00:37.320
    He's the Associate Director of National Sales at Symmetry Partners. Jt,

    9
    00:00:37.320 --> 00:00:38.440
    thanks for joining us here,

    10
    00:00:38.740 --> 00:00:40.560
    Tom. Thanks for having me. Appreciate it. So,

    11
    00:00:40.740 --> 00:00:43.280
    Jt, tell us a little bit about, about your background, um,

    12
    00:00:43.310 --> 00:00:44.600
    working with advisors.

    13
    00:00:44.870 --> 00:00:48.000
    I've been working with advisors, Tom, for about 23 years now, kind of in,

    14
    00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:51.920
    in different facets. Uh, I started off on the service side of things at a, at a,

    15
    00:00:51.940 --> 00:00:55.720
    at a major mutual fund company up in Boston, answering phones and, and,

    16
    00:00:55.860 --> 00:00:58.080
    you know, trying to solve problems. And I, you know,

    17
    00:00:58.080 --> 00:01:02.160
    transitioned over to the sales side, uh, a few years after that. So I have a,

    18
    00:01:02.160 --> 00:01:05.880
    you know, pretty good background working with advisors that were more on the,

    19
    00:01:05.880 --> 00:01:07.240
    uh, commission side of things,

    20
    00:01:07.380 --> 00:01:10.640
    as well as advisors that are on the fee-based side of things. For

    21
    00:01:10.640 --> 00:01:14.160
    Our listeners, um, describe the difference between the two because I,

    22
    00:01:14.240 --> 00:01:18.000
    I think a lot of folks out there don't know if they're paying fees or

    23
    00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:18.700
    commissions, and,

    24
    00:01:18.700 --> 00:01:22.760
    and I've heard many times talking to investors that they don't think they pay

    25
    00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:23.630
    anything. Mm-hmm.

    26
    00:01:23.630 --> 00:01:26.120
    Yeah. So, uh, you know, commissions are paid out, uh, by,

    27
    00:01:26.120 --> 00:01:27.240
    let's say a mutual fund company.

    28
    00:01:27.390 --> 00:01:30.680
    They will pay out a commission to the advisor who sells that particular mutual

    29
    00:01:30.710 --> 00:01:32.080
    fund to, uh, to their client.

    30
    00:01:32.460 --> 00:01:36.400
    And it's could be paid out in a very various of different ways. Um, you know,

    31
    00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:39.240
    if it's a shares, it'll be an upfront sales charge, B shares,

    32
    00:01:39.240 --> 00:01:40.760
    which don't even think is even a thing anymore.

    33
    00:01:40.760 --> 00:01:43.760
    It was a contingent deferred sales charge. There was no upfront sales charge,

    34
    00:01:43.980 --> 00:01:46.680
    but it was a declining sales charge As time goes on and you,

    35
    00:01:46.700 --> 00:01:49.120
    and you were to sell that particular holding, you know, the,

    36
    00:01:49.120 --> 00:01:53.120
    the sales charge would be reduced. And then you also had c shares that were,

    37
    00:01:53.140 --> 00:01:56.280
    you know, about a 1%, you know, uh, uh, trail that would, uh,

    38
    00:01:56.350 --> 00:01:57.800
    that would pay out to the advisors.

    39
    00:01:57.800 --> 00:02:00.520
    And those are paid through various fees that are within the mutual funds that

    40
    00:02:00.520 --> 00:02:03.040
    the mutual fund companies, uh, structure around, you know,

    41
    00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:05.520
    marketing of their particular products as well as, um,

    42
    00:02:05.540 --> 00:02:06.920
    as selling those particular products,

    43
    00:02:06.930 --> 00:02:10.200
    verse the fee side of things where it's advisors are just simply charging a fee

    44
    00:02:10.200 --> 00:02:13.640
    for their advice. They're advising their clients on what they should be doing.

    45
    00:02:14.180 --> 00:02:17.240
    Um, there's often, there's more than just, um, more advice,

    46
    00:02:17.310 --> 00:02:20.400
    more than just advice that goes into it. It's, you know, financial planning,

    47
    00:02:20.680 --> 00:02:23.040
    holistic planning and things like that. But it's generally a,

    48
    00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:25.760
    a fee that's fully disclosed that they, that they pay.

    49
    00:02:26.300 --> 00:02:29.560
    And the way most advisors will structure their fees,

    50
    00:02:29.590 --> 00:02:32.440
    they'll structure 'em in such a manner that the more money you have, uh,

    51
    00:02:32.440 --> 00:02:34.840
    you'll start to see those fees actually go down. So

    52
    00:02:34.840 --> 00:02:37.360
    What I'm hearing you say, it sounds like, and I think the,

    53
    00:02:37.460 --> 00:02:39.800
    you said contingent deferred sales charge, right?

    54
    00:02:39.860 --> 00:02:43.280
    If if you're earning a commission, that is a, it's a sales charge, correct?

    55
    00:02:43.370 --> 00:02:48.040
    Right. Whereas, uh, fee for advice is exactly that,

    56
    00:02:48.240 --> 00:02:51.480
    right? It's a fee for, for giving advice so that it's not necessarily a,

    57
    00:02:52.040 --> 00:02:53.600
    a sales charge. Um,

    58
    00:02:53.660 --> 00:02:56.200
    why do you think it's important for investors to know the difference between the

    59
    00:02:56.200 --> 00:02:56.760
    two? Well,

    60
    00:02:56.760 --> 00:02:59.440
    It's important for them to know the difference. It's,

    61
    00:02:59.440 --> 00:03:02.040
    I think it's just important for them to know what they're, what they're getting.

    62
    00:03:02.090 --> 00:03:05.040
    First of all, commissions. You can say that there's, you know,

    63
    00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:08.120
    conflicts of interest perhaps. Are they getting sold something that,

    64
    00:03:08.230 --> 00:03:10.880
    that has a higher commission that, that, you know,

    65
    00:03:10.880 --> 00:03:14.040
    the advisor's gonna get paid more money on, you know, verse, you know,

    66
    00:03:14.040 --> 00:03:14.873
    they always say, you know,

    67
    00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:19.000
    a fee-based advisor usually will generally sort of align themselves with the

    68
    00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:22.040
    client, let's say, on the, on the same side of the table, so to speak. They're,

    69
    00:03:22.040 --> 00:03:25.400
    they're, they're going in as a team, we're here to, you know, you got your,

    70
    00:03:25.420 --> 00:03:27.120
    you want to get from point A to point B,

    71
    00:03:27.210 --> 00:03:28.800
    let's figure out the best way to do that,

    72
    00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:31.680
    and then we'll put you in the appropriate investments. And, you know,

    73
    00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:34.040
    because they're not, you know, getting any commissions, you know,

    74
    00:03:34.040 --> 00:03:35.680
    generally speaking, there's a, I think,

    75
    00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:39.240
    a certain comfort level knowing that the investment solution's gonna be right

    76
    00:03:39.240 --> 00:03:39.780
    for them.

    77
    00:03:39.780 --> 00:03:42.360
    No, that, that's a really great explanation. And you know, this,

    78
    00:03:42.510 --> 00:03:45.160
    this podcast where, where our advocates of,

    79
    00:03:45.220 --> 00:03:47.200
    of financial advisors and financial advice,

    80
    00:03:47.200 --> 00:03:51.400
    I've said many times before that I always get asked, you know, what's a,

    81
    00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:54.520
    what's a great stock tip? What's a great tip? What's some advice for investing?

    82
    00:03:54.520 --> 00:03:57.520
    And my advice is always work with a, a fee advisor,

    83
    00:03:58.030 --> 00:04:00.200
    because that advice is extremely valuable.

    84
    00:04:00.470 --> 00:04:05.280
    What are you seeing the average on the fee based side average advisory fees in

    85
    00:04:05.280 --> 00:04:09.360
    the industry? What should investors, what should they know about advisory fees?

    86
    00:04:09.580 --> 00:04:10.720
    Um, just generally? Yeah, generally,

    87
    00:04:10.720 --> 00:04:13.280
    Generally speaking, I would, I would say that the, you know,

    88
    00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:18.160
    the average fee probably comes in around 1%. Um, you know, we see, you know,

    89
    00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:20.160
    just on our, on ourt here at Symmetry,

    90
    00:04:20.240 --> 00:04:23.360
    I think the average advisory fee is somewhere around 97 basis points,

    91
    00:04:23.380 --> 00:04:24.280
    if I'm not mistaken.

    92
    00:04:24.460 --> 00:04:29.120
    And so we'll see advisors charge as little as maybe 60 or 50 basis points,

    93
    00:04:29.420 --> 00:04:34.280
    and we'll see advisors charge, you know, as, as high as 125 basis points.

    94
    00:04:34.430 --> 00:04:37.760
    It's hard to say what's right. It's, what it comes down to is, you know,

    95
    00:04:37.760 --> 00:04:39.960
    your comfort level and what you're getting for those services.

    96
    00:04:40.350 --> 00:04:44.000
    Some advisors will, uh, will charge, let's say lower basis points,

    97
    00:04:44.060 --> 00:04:47.120
    but they'll also charge on top of that for other services, like, let's say,

    98
    00:04:47.120 --> 00:04:48.320
    financial planning. Okay.

    99
    00:04:48.320 --> 00:04:52.680
    Whereas some advisors will charge 125 basis points and let's say maybe financial

    100
    00:04:52.840 --> 00:04:56.040
    planning's included in that. And so it's always good to know, you know,

    101
    00:04:56.260 --> 00:04:57.520
    you know, not only what you're paying,

    102
    00:04:57.540 --> 00:05:00.960
    but also what you're getting for that particular price or that fee that you're

    103
    00:05:00.960 --> 00:05:01.360
    paying. Okay.

    104
    00:05:01.360 --> 00:05:03.920
    So these are a couple things that I kind of want to dive into a little bit.

    105
    00:05:03.920 --> 00:05:05.840
    First and foremost, I think, you know,

    106
    00:05:05.840 --> 00:05:10.360
    it's not fair to talk about price and fees without talking about value, right?

    107
    00:05:10.360 --> 00:05:10.740
    Right.

    108
    00:05:10.740 --> 00:05:15.600
    And so I think that you are going to see varying degrees of fees across the

    109
    00:05:15.600 --> 00:05:18.600
    board, depending on, on, on the advisor's value proposition,

    110
    00:05:19.180 --> 00:05:23.000
    1% that we've seen that fee, that that really hasn't changed. Mm-hmm. Right?

    111
    00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:27.880
    Mm-hmm. Um, we, we do hear a lot about price compression in the industry, but I,

    112
    00:05:27.880 --> 00:05:30.880
    I think when it comes to the, the financial advisor's compensation,

    113
    00:05:30.940 --> 00:05:33.560
    and I would argue that the financial advisor is the, uh,

    114
    00:05:33.560 --> 00:05:37.040
    most valuable person in the value chain. Mm-hmm. That fee hasn't changed,

    115
    00:05:37.260 --> 00:05:40.800
    but investors are looking more for, from their advisors. So there's some,

    116
    00:05:40.800 --> 00:05:42.520
    there's some margin compression there, right?

    117
    00:05:42.790 --> 00:05:44.000
    Yeah. The advisor, you know, uh,

    118
    00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:47.360
    clients are becoming more savvy conversation around fees. It's,

    119
    00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:49.680
    it's out in the open, right? You see 'em on commercials all the time,

    120
    00:05:49.870 --> 00:05:53.480
    whether it's Schwab or Fidelity or Vanguard, you know, talking about, you know,

    121
    00:05:53.500 --> 00:05:57.720
    low fees. So, uh, it's out there and clients are well aware of that.

    122
    00:05:58.180 --> 00:05:59.760
    And so they're starting to ask questions,

    123
    00:05:59.760 --> 00:06:02.760
    they're starting to ask what they're getting for, for that particular fee.

    124
    00:06:03.140 --> 00:06:05.040
    But at the end of the day, you know, you know, it's,

    125
    00:06:05.040 --> 00:06:07.280
    it's only an issue in the absence of value, you know,

    126
    00:06:07.280 --> 00:06:11.000
    so if the advisor's providing value and they see that and they know that, then,

    127
    00:06:11.020 --> 00:06:12.000
    you know, generally speaking,

    128
    00:06:12.000 --> 00:06:13.680
    clients tend to be comfortable with what they're paying.

    129
    00:06:13.750 --> 00:06:17.800
    Certainly, certainly. What are you, you know, the advisors that are charging 1%,

    130
    00:06:17.800 --> 00:06:21.960
    what are the typical types of services that you see advisors performing for,

    131
    00:06:22.060 --> 00:06:24.120
    for that fee to add value to the equation?

    132
    00:06:24.380 --> 00:06:26.560
    That's a great question. You know, we, we kind of see,

    133
    00:06:26.980 --> 00:06:30.320
    we see a lot of advisors that are rolling financial planning into their fee.

    134
    00:06:30.460 --> 00:06:32.600
    You know, we, we, we see that there's, um,

    135
    00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:36.440
    there's a lot of advisors that actually have a, a, um, what I would say,

    136
    00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:40.320
    a very big financial planning focus. So they'll charge for financial plans,

    137
    00:06:40.540 --> 00:06:43.760
    and they may do some advisory business along the way, uh,

    138
    00:06:43.760 --> 00:06:45.720
    just to help out clients. And so they'll, you know,

    139
    00:06:45.720 --> 00:06:48.760
    they may charge maybe a little less, maybe around 80 basis points,

    140
    00:06:48.760 --> 00:06:51.080
    80 to 90 basis points, kind of what we're seeing there.

    141
    00:06:51.470 --> 00:06:53.040
    Okay. That makes a lot of sense. I, I,

    142
    00:06:53.080 --> 00:06:56.120
    I think that the value proposition for the advisors actually shifted quite a bit

    143
    00:06:56.120 --> 00:07:00.720
    over the years. You know, you and I have talked, um, a lot about this and,

    144
    00:07:00.720 --> 00:07:01.000
    you know,

    145
    00:07:01.000 --> 00:07:05.960
    there was a time where the value proposition was thought to be returned. Mm-hmm.

    146
    00:07:06.470 --> 00:07:10.520
    I'll pay you a higher fee for higher rates of return. And is that the case? No,

    147
    00:07:10.520 --> 00:07:10.720
    because

    148
    00:07:10.720 --> 00:07:15.440
    It's, you know, I, I think the, the juries, you know, come in, in terms of,

    149
    00:07:15.580 --> 00:07:19.160
    of returns and in terms of what types of investments you should be in. I mean,

    150
    00:07:19.160 --> 00:07:19.720
    right now, I mean,

    151
    00:07:19.720 --> 00:07:23.080
    you're seeing huge outflows from going from what I would say traditional active

    152
    00:07:23.860 --> 00:07:28.080
    to more traditional passive types of investing. And so I think the, the,

    153
    00:07:28.080 --> 00:07:32.000
    the main role for the advisor is just really being that behavioral coach. Uh,

    154
    00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:33.880
    when we're left to our own devices, we don't make,

    155
    00:07:33.900 --> 00:07:36.960
    we necessarily don't make the best decisions, uh, when it comes to investing.

    156
    00:07:36.960 --> 00:07:41.040
    We, we get very emotional about our, our money and when, when markets are down,

    157
    00:07:41.140 --> 00:07:43.600
    we, we tend to hit, you know, hit the panic button and sell,

    158
    00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:46.760
    and that's the wrong time to sell. And so, um, you know, when you look at the,

    159
    00:07:46.910 --> 00:07:51.000
    like, industry studies that are out there, I mean, the vanguard's out, you know,

    160
    00:07:51.000 --> 00:07:53.440
    advisor Alpha is a big one, shows that, you know,

    161
    00:07:53.440 --> 00:07:56.280
    working with a financial advisor, you can, um, you know,

    162
    00:07:56.280 --> 00:08:00.840
    capture about 300 basis points extra just by working with a financial advisor.

    163
    00:08:01.260 --> 00:08:02.760
    And they actually attribute most of that to,

    164
    00:08:02.760 --> 00:08:04.920
    but I think about half of that to behavioral coaching. Sure.

    165
    00:08:04.920 --> 00:08:07.160
    And the, um, just for our listeners out there,

    166
    00:08:07.180 --> 00:08:10.480
    the advisors Alpha study that was done by, uh, Vanguard,

    167
    00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:13.880
    I believe it's a paper that they put out in conjunction with,

    168
    00:08:13.880 --> 00:08:15.120
    with the Spectrum group. And,

    169
    00:08:15.120 --> 00:08:19.320
    and it does show that investors who tend to work with financial advisors tend to

    170
    00:08:19.320 --> 00:08:20.400
    have better performance,

    171
    00:08:20.460 --> 00:08:23.400
    but it doesn't necessarily mean that the advisors tinkering with the portfolio.

    172
    00:08:23.500 --> 00:08:27.920
    The value proposition, to your point, is coaching. It's competent,

    173
    00:08:27.920 --> 00:08:32.400
    it's communication. It, it's, it's these things that help the investor, uh,

    174
    00:08:32.400 --> 00:08:34.520
    whether the good times and the bad. And, and,

    175
    00:08:34.580 --> 00:08:37.240
    and providing that sort of foundation,

    176
    00:08:37.270 --> 00:08:41.840
    helping the investor stay the course really is the, the secret to,

    177
    00:08:41.900 --> 00:08:44.240
    to having a successful investment experience. I

    178
    00:08:44.480 --> 00:08:47.240
    Think it's also important to add that I think a lot of advisors now, you know,

    179
    00:08:47.240 --> 00:08:48.920
    there is sort of a, a paradigm shift.

    180
    00:08:48.920 --> 00:08:52.720
    It's not necessarily the returns that I can generate for you. Um, it's,

    181
    00:08:52.750 --> 00:08:55.240
    it's the other things that I can do for you, um,

    182
    00:08:55.240 --> 00:08:58.360
    because they know that they're not portfolio manager. Mm-hmm. You know, they're,

    183
    00:08:58.420 --> 00:08:59.040
    you know, they're,

    184
    00:08:59.040 --> 00:09:01.840
    they're running their own business and that business is helping people.

    185
    00:09:01.900 --> 00:09:04.560
    And if they're spending all their time trying to figure out what the best stock

    186
    00:09:04.580 --> 00:09:07.320
    is, they're, they're probably gonna miss the boat on, you know,

    187
    00:09:07.320 --> 00:09:09.600
    helping their clients, you know, with their financial planning and,

    188
    00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:12.720
    and meeting their, you know, their financial goals over time. Sure,

    189
    00:09:12.870 --> 00:09:16.000
    Sure. So, you know, we talked a lot about the advisor compensation,

    190
    00:09:16.300 --> 00:09:19.720
    and I kind of wanna revert back because, you know, the topic today is fees.

    191
    00:09:19.720 --> 00:09:21.520
    Mm-hmm. It's not just advisory fees.

    192
    00:09:21.520 --> 00:09:24.040
    There are a number of other fees associated with investing.

    193
    00:09:24.220 --> 00:09:27.040
    You talked a little bit about the ahas, B shares and CS shares,

    194
    00:09:27.040 --> 00:09:29.520
    which are typically sales charges for mutual funds,

    195
    00:09:29.520 --> 00:09:33.360
    but there are no load mutual funds out there. There are. Correct. And, uh,

    196
    00:09:33.390 --> 00:09:36.680
    what that means is there, there isn't a, a sales charge per se,

    197
    00:09:36.700 --> 00:09:39.080
    but that doesn't mean that they're for free. Correct. Correct.

    198
    00:09:39.080 --> 00:09:40.000
    Nothing's for free.

    199
    00:09:40.050 --> 00:09:40.860
    Right.

    200
    00:09:40.860 --> 00:09:43.680
    So talk to us a little bit about the costs that are associated with investing in

    201
    00:09:43.680 --> 00:09:47.160
    something that, that, that no load or doesn't have a, a sales charge. Sure.

    202
    00:09:47.160 --> 00:09:47.280
    Yeah.

    203
    00:09:47.280 --> 00:09:50.200
    There's a couple costs to think about. You know, there's, I always refer to it,

    204
    00:09:50.200 --> 00:09:53.600
    you know, the cost of investing, right? There's, there's gonna be, you know,

    205
    00:09:53.600 --> 00:09:56.280
    some cost to, you know, running a portfolio. I mean,

    206
    00:09:56.280 --> 00:09:59.760
    that's where your expense ratios come in, which is the really, it's the,

    207
    00:09:59.780 --> 00:10:02.760
    the cost of running that particular, let's say, mutual fund if,

    208
    00:10:02.760 --> 00:10:05.680
    whether it's a no load or, or a loaded mutual fund. I mean,

    209
    00:10:05.680 --> 00:10:09.040
    those are things like, you know, trading costs, management fees, um,

    210
    00:10:09.040 --> 00:10:11.960
    things of that nature. There's also, um, you know,

    211
    00:10:11.960 --> 00:10:14.760
    custody fees that you have to think about, you know, what, uh,

    212
    00:10:14.760 --> 00:10:17.920
    what custodian is gonna be housing those, those, um,

    213
    00:10:17.920 --> 00:10:21.160
    those assets for you and what that pay structure looks like. I mean, we see,

    214
    00:10:21.620 --> 00:10:25.040
    you know, uh, some custodians that'll do a flat, you know, flat rate fee,

    215
    00:10:25.260 --> 00:10:27.440
    and we see some that'll have more of a tiered structure.

    216
    00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:30.720
    So the more that you give them the, the lower that fee will come down. Again,

    217
    00:10:30.720 --> 00:10:32.320
    there's, you know, certain services that are,

    218
    00:10:32.320 --> 00:10:35.640
    that are provided by the custodian that you may seem are valuable.

    219
    00:10:35.700 --> 00:10:37.960
    So maybe paying 15 basis points is worth it,

    220
    00:10:38.340 --> 00:10:41.760
    and you may not see any value in that. And, and paying something like, you know,

    221
    00:10:41.760 --> 00:10:44.040
    five or seven basis points maybe more, more suited.

    222
    00:10:44.040 --> 00:10:48.600
    But those are all sort of what I would say in the category of just the cost of

    223
    00:10:48.600 --> 00:10:49.430
    investing.

    224
    00:10:49.430 --> 00:10:52.600
    Sure. Sure. And, and when you're looking at investment vehicles,

    225
    00:10:52.600 --> 00:10:54.280
    mutual funds mm-hmm. ETFs,

    226
    00:10:54.770 --> 00:10:58.280
    those expense ratios that comprise some of those costs,

    227
    00:10:58.750 --> 00:11:02.400
    what are you seeing on average out there, and are those fees coming down? Uh,

    228
    00:11:02.400 --> 00:11:05.400
    They are coming down, I pulled some numbers, you know, looking at just on,

    229
    00:11:05.420 --> 00:11:06.920
    on averages, the, you know,

    230
    00:11:06.920 --> 00:11:09.440
    the average expense ratio for a large cap mutual fund,

    231
    00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:13.640
    about 86 basis points on the small cap side, it's averaging around, you know,

    232
    00:11:13.640 --> 00:11:17.360
    1.4%. You know, so again, those are the averages. So you,

    233
    00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:19.880
    you do see some mutual funds that can be as high as a, you know,

    234
    00:11:20.050 --> 00:11:22.600
    north of a hundred and twenty five hundred thirty basis points.

    235
    00:11:22.660 --> 00:11:25.880
    And then you can see some that are just a couple of basis points, you know,

    236
    00:11:25.880 --> 00:11:29.360
    two basis points, five basis points for, you know, just a simple, uh,

    237
    00:11:29.490 --> 00:11:31.440
    index tracking strategy. Okay. So

    238
    00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:34.160
    You said a couple things there that I find interesting. First and foremost, uh,

    239
    00:11:34.500 --> 00:11:38.120
    the asset class matters, right? Mm-hmm. Large cap versus small cap.

    240
    00:11:38.340 --> 00:11:41.680
    And I think it would make sense that smaller cap stocks,

    241
    00:11:41.680 --> 00:11:46.200
    smaller stocks are probably more costly to, to manage and maintain.

    242
    00:11:46.200 --> 00:11:47.240
    So you'd expect higher expense

    243
    00:11:47.240 --> 00:11:49.880
    Ratio, right? Yeah. And to trade 'em, it's harder to get access to 'em.

    244
    00:11:49.880 --> 00:11:52.120
    Yeah. And we see the same thing in, in liquid alternatives.

    245
    00:11:52.120 --> 00:11:55.680
    Like those alternative strategies tend to be a little pricey. Um,

    246
    00:11:57.340 --> 00:12:01.480
    so the asset class matters. We are believers of global diversification,

    247
    00:12:01.540 --> 00:12:05.000
    so having a little bit of all of those asset classes I think makes a lot of

    248
    00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:06.160
    sense. Correct. Um,

    249
    00:12:06.260 --> 00:12:09.080
    but you also mentioned something that I kind of want to dive into a little bit.

    250
    00:12:10.340 --> 00:12:14.840
    You know, 86 basis points on average for large cap mutual fund.

    251
    00:12:15.300 --> 00:12:19.080
    But you said you can get asset class exposures with index funds for just a

    252
    00:12:19.080 --> 00:12:23.240
    couple of basis points, correct? Or hundredth of a percent. Mm-hmm. Why is that?

    253
    00:12:23.780 --> 00:12:25.480
    Uh, I think it comes down to, you know, activity.

    254
    00:12:25.540 --> 00:12:28.480
    The more active a strategy is you're, you're gonna see, you know, more turnover,

    255
    00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:30.520
    that's more trading, and that's gonna, you know,

    256
    00:12:30.520 --> 00:12:33.840
    cause the expense ratios to be a little bit higher than a more passive

    257
    00:12:33.840 --> 00:12:37.360
    portfolio. Let's just, let's, let's just say tracking the s and p 500.

    258
    00:12:37.710 --> 00:12:38.100
    Sure.

    259
    00:12:38.100 --> 00:12:42.960
    So someone who is trying to attempt to outperform the s and p

    260
    00:12:42.960 --> 00:12:47.600
    500 will do so by buying and selling Correct. Creating activity,

    261
    00:12:48.070 --> 00:12:51.400
    raising costs, also taxes. Mm-hmm.

    262
    00:12:52.270 --> 00:12:56.280
    Whereas simply buying and holding an index of the s and p 500,

    263
    00:12:56.310 --> 00:12:59.960
    obviously is going to not only be less costly, but also more tax efficient.

    264
    00:12:59.960 --> 00:13:00.460
    Correct.

    265
    00:13:00.460 --> 00:13:02.400
    And it's also important to know what you're, what you're buying.

    266
    00:13:02.430 --> 00:13:05.520
    There's a lot of people out there who, who believe in active management.

    267
    00:13:05.520 --> 00:13:06.400
    They think that that,

    268
    00:13:06.400 --> 00:13:10.000
    that there is alpha out there that a portfolio manager can provide,

    269
    00:13:10.500 --> 00:13:12.040
    and in order to capture that alpha,

    270
    00:13:12.040 --> 00:13:15.240
    they're willing to pay the extra expenses for that. So if you,

    271
    00:13:15.240 --> 00:13:18.520
    if you know that going into it, then knowledge is king. Right? So,

    272
    00:13:18.660 --> 00:13:21.800
    so you're okay with that. It's the people that don't understand that,

    273
    00:13:21.830 --> 00:13:24.760
    that are in a portfolio, let's say a 401K plan, for example,

    274
    00:13:24.780 --> 00:13:26.360
    you go into the menu, you,

    275
    00:13:26.510 --> 00:13:29.240
    most people are probably gonna look at what their historical returns are,

    276
    00:13:29.240 --> 00:13:32.680
    and they're gonna probably make a decision based off of past performance not

    277
    00:13:32.680 --> 00:13:35.320
    knowing what, what's under the underlying securities or,

    278
    00:13:35.320 --> 00:13:38.240
    or what the strategy is behind the individual mutual fund.

    279
    00:13:38.240 --> 00:13:39.320
    And they could be paying, you know,

    280
    00:13:39.320 --> 00:13:42.480
    higher fees and not knowing really what they're paying or why they're paying it.

    281
    00:13:42.550 --> 00:13:42.840
    Yeah.

    282
    00:13:42.840 --> 00:13:44.880
    And it, and it's important, right? At the end of the day,

    283
    00:13:45.390 --> 00:13:49.160
    what you pay in fees comes off the top of what your return is. And over time,

    284
    00:13:49.160 --> 00:13:52.600
    that can be substantial. We say lot on this podcast, you know, we,

    285
    00:13:52.620 --> 00:13:55.600
    we can't control the markets, we can't control asset allocation,

    286
    00:13:55.740 --> 00:14:00.120
    we can't control costs, and we can't control taxes. And we, we,

    287
    00:14:00.260 --> 00:14:04.600
    we educate our listeners that, hey, focus on things you can control. Mm-hmm.

    288
    00:14:04.680 --> 00:14:08.120
    Right? And so fees do matter at the end of the day.

    289
    00:14:08.380 --> 00:14:11.400
    And I think there's been a lot of studies out there, if I'm not mistaken,

    290
    00:14:11.510 --> 00:14:13.880
    Morningstar had one not too long ago that says,

    291
    00:14:14.060 --> 00:14:17.680
    one of the key indicators of a mutual fund's performance is the expense ratio.

    292
    00:14:17.700 --> 00:14:20.640
    The lower the fee, the greater likelihood it's gonna perform well. Yeah. Well

    293
    00:14:20.640 --> 00:14:22.800
    Think about this. So in, in keeping with that,

    294
    00:14:22.900 --> 00:14:27.520
    if you are in a mutual fund that has a 1% expense ratio and that mutual fund

    295
    00:14:27.520 --> 00:14:28.520
    returned 5%,

    296
    00:14:28.580 --> 00:14:31.720
    you're automatically giving up 20% and you're giving that back to the,

    297
    00:14:31.720 --> 00:14:32.840
    to the fund company, right?

    298
    00:14:33.190 --> 00:14:34.720
    501 is four. Exactly.

    299
    00:14:34.830 --> 00:14:37.400
    Just, you know, basic math right there. Mm-hmm. So there, there, there is,

    300
    00:14:37.740 --> 00:14:40.040
    you know, fees do matter and they do erode, you know,

    301
    00:14:40.040 --> 00:14:42.120
    performance particularly over time. Uh,

    302
    00:14:42.120 --> 00:14:44.800
    I got a couple other examples here I can share with you. You know, please just,

    303
    00:14:45.180 --> 00:14:46.600
    you know, keeping things simple, you know,

    304
    00:14:46.600 --> 00:14:49.600
    a hundred thousand dollars investment over 20 years, um,

    305
    00:14:49.880 --> 00:14:54.320
    assuming a 6% rate of return in a mutual fund that has a 1% expense ratio,

    306
    00:14:54.340 --> 00:14:55.600
    forget about, you know, custody,

    307
    00:14:55.780 --> 00:14:58.120
    forget about advisory fees and all that other stuff,

    308
    00:14:58.150 --> 00:15:01.720
    just straight up just investing in a one per, in a mutual fund that's, uh, 1%,

    309
    00:15:02.020 --> 00:15:04.200
    uh, at the end of that 20 years, you know, you'll end up with a,

    310
    00:15:04.240 --> 00:15:08.680
    a gross return of $320,713 and 55 cents.

    311
    00:15:08.830 --> 00:15:10.800
    Take a look at the cost of fees.

    312
    00:15:10.800 --> 00:15:14.880
    The cost of fees of that are actually $55 $383 and 78 cents.

    313
    00:15:14.880 --> 00:15:17.680
    So you're gonna end up, uh, at the, in your account at the end of the day,

    314
    00:15:17.680 --> 00:15:18.640
    after 20 years with, uh,

    315
    00:15:18.640 --> 00:15:23.120
    $265,329 and 77 cents.

    316
    00:15:23.420 --> 00:15:26.240
    And that's if you're invested in a, a, a mutual fund that has, you know,

    317
    00:15:26.240 --> 00:15:29.960
    expense ratio 1%. And some people look at that and they say, that's great.

    318
    00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:32.680
    That's that, that's a good return over 20 years. I'll take that.

    319
    00:15:32.870 --> 00:15:36.320
    When you compare that, everything else being equal, but it's invested. Now in a,

    320
    00:15:36.320 --> 00:15:40.720
    in a mutual fund that has an expense ratio of, uh, 25 basis points, again,

    321
    00:15:40.760 --> 00:15:44.640
    a hundred thousand dollars over 20 years, 6% rate of return. The end of that,

    322
    00:15:44.640 --> 00:15:45.060
    you, you,

    323
    00:15:45.060 --> 00:15:49.800
    you still end up with the $320,713 55 cents,

    324
    00:15:49.900 --> 00:15:51.920
    uh, on the gross end. But on the net,

    325
    00:15:51.920 --> 00:15:56.720
    what you end up with is $305,919 and 75 cents.

    326
    00:15:57.420 --> 00:16:00.600
    And so that's a cost, cost of fees there of 14,

    327
    00:16:00.620 --> 00:16:03.480
    do $14,793 and 80 cents.

    328
    00:16:03.740 --> 00:16:07.000
    So that's a significant difference ends up in your pocket. That's,

    329
    00:16:07.000 --> 00:16:08.440
    That's, that's, that's massive. And we,

    330
    00:16:08.440 --> 00:16:12.120
    we told our listeners there wouldn't be any math, but, uh, no, that, that,

    331
    00:16:12.120 --> 00:16:13.800
    that is very true. But the thing is fees,

    332
    00:16:14.070 --> 00:16:16.480
    it's part of investing like anything else. Mm-hmm. Right. They're,

    333
    00:16:16.480 --> 00:16:18.480
    they're there. And I think it's important for investors to know,

    334
    00:16:18.820 --> 00:16:21.160
    one of the things, uh, I read an article many years ago,

    335
    00:16:21.300 --> 00:16:25.720
    and I think it's still prevalent and it's the notion of transparency, right?

    336
    00:16:25.780 --> 00:16:28.200
    And, and, and what this article did, it was from,

    337
    00:16:28.310 --> 00:16:32.240
    from State Street Global Advisors partnering with, uh, Wharton.

    338
    00:16:32.860 --> 00:16:37.120
    And they interviewed a number of investors, um, about fees and,

    339
    00:16:37.140 --> 00:16:39.120
    and their sentiments around fees.

    340
    00:16:40.100 --> 00:16:44.680
    And what that study showed us was, it's not so much the,

    341
    00:16:44.700 --> 00:16:47.400
    the level of the fee as they just wanted to know what it is.

    342
    00:16:48.300 --> 00:16:50.960
    And why do you think there's such a lack of transparency with,

    343
    00:16:51.350 --> 00:16:53.200
    with costs in this industry?

    344
    00:16:53.560 --> 00:16:55.960
    I just think it's easy to, it's easy to bury. That's

    345
    00:16:55.960 --> 00:16:56.460
    Unfortunate.

    346
    00:16:56.460 --> 00:16:58.360
    You know, I think, and, and I think that's, that's,

    347
    00:16:58.380 --> 00:17:01.200
    that's starting to change a little bit. I know we see it in our business,

    348
    00:17:01.420 --> 00:17:02.760
    you know, and one of the things that,

    349
    00:17:02.760 --> 00:17:05.760
    that we always kind of pride ourselves on are full transparency on fees,

    350
    00:17:06.260 --> 00:17:07.400
    you know? But if you can look,

    351
    00:17:07.620 --> 00:17:09.760
    if you can look less expensive than your competitor,

    352
    00:17:10.190 --> 00:17:13.680
    then you feel that's gonna give you a competitive advantage. And so, you know,

    353
    00:17:13.740 --> 00:17:14.400
    so it's,

    354
    00:17:14.400 --> 00:17:18.040
    it's unfortunately I would say it's not uncommon for investment companies or

    355
    00:17:18.090 --> 00:17:20.080
    other providers to, you know, kind of, you know,

    356
    00:17:20.280 --> 00:17:24.440
    bury their fees or sort of hide them within, you know, the structure of their,

    357
    00:17:24.620 --> 00:17:26.320
    of their, um, of their costs.

    358
    00:17:26.830 --> 00:17:30.360
    Well, I think you, you said it best, right? In in, if there's value,

    359
    00:17:30.460 --> 00:17:33.560
    the fees don't matter. Correct. Right. If you're getting what you're paying for.

    360
    00:17:34.020 --> 00:17:38.320
    And so I think that there's a notion of a lot of advisors out there not wanting

    361
    00:17:38.320 --> 00:17:39.200
    to talk about fees,

    362
    00:17:39.300 --> 00:17:42.800
    cuz they might not be confident in their own value proposition. However,

    363
    00:17:43.130 --> 00:17:47.960
    there are a lot of advisors that you and I work with on a daily basis that

    364
    00:17:48.190 --> 00:17:50.640
    they're very upfront with what their cost structure is.

    365
    00:17:50.640 --> 00:17:53.800
    They're very upfront with the fees are of the underlying investments,

    366
    00:17:54.300 --> 00:17:58.400
    and they bring that transparent to the table because they have a very strong

    367
    00:17:58.400 --> 00:17:59.520
    value proposition of their

    368
    00:17:59.520 --> 00:18:01.320
    Clients. Yep. Yeah. They'll have it on their website, they'll have their,

    369
    00:18:01.320 --> 00:18:04.520
    their fee, you know, their fee schedule on there along with, you know, the,

    370
    00:18:04.660 --> 00:18:07.240
    the various services that they charge and, you know,

    371
    00:18:07.480 --> 00:18:10.320
    whether you feel it's high or whether you feel it's low, at the end of the day,

    372
    00:18:10.320 --> 00:18:13.280
    it's up to you to decide what's best for you. But at least you know,

    373
    00:18:13.280 --> 00:18:15.880
    you have that full disclosure. Um, so you can make the,

    374
    00:18:15.880 --> 00:18:17.800
    the best decision possible. Certainly,

    375
    00:18:17.800 --> 00:18:20.800
    Certainly. So if, if our listeners are out there looking for a,

    376
    00:18:20.840 --> 00:18:22.080
    a financial advisor, you know,

    377
    00:18:22.080 --> 00:18:24.680
    some of the things that I'm hearing you say that they should be looking for is,

    378
    00:18:24.780 --> 00:18:29.480
    is the advisor using a commission-based mo a commission-based model or a

    379
    00:18:29.480 --> 00:18:32.120
    fee-based model? Mm-hmm. Are they, uh,

    380
    00:18:32.510 --> 00:18:36.080
    transparent with their compensation and uh,

    381
    00:18:36.080 --> 00:18:38.560
    are they transparent with their value proposition? Correct. Is,

    382
    00:18:38.560 --> 00:18:40.480
    is there anything else that, that you would add to that?

    383
    00:18:40.740 --> 00:18:43.720
    Um, just knowing what services you're gonna get. You know, I think, you know,

    384
    00:18:43.720 --> 00:18:45.120
    time and time again, we, he,

    385
    00:18:45.180 --> 00:18:49.520
    we hear stories that client felt that they were gonna get something from an

    386
    00:18:49.520 --> 00:18:50.200
    advisor that they're,

    387
    00:18:50.200 --> 00:18:53.240
    they're just not getting and they end up firing that advisor. You know,

    388
    00:18:53.260 --> 00:18:56.000
    so knowing what you're gonna get from that advisor, and, and some advisors,

    389
    00:18:56.000 --> 00:18:58.720
    again, they'll have this right on their website or they'll have it on that first

    390
    00:18:58.720 --> 00:19:01.720
    consultation that they talk to. They'll tell you, Hey, look, you're gonna get,

    391
    00:19:01.720 --> 00:19:04.000
    you know, four, you know, four meetings a year.

    392
    00:19:04.000 --> 00:19:07.120
    You're gonna get six phone calls, you know, from me a year and,

    393
    00:19:07.120 --> 00:19:09.960
    and here's my cell phone number. If there's ever an emergency for something,

    394
    00:19:09.960 --> 00:19:13.160
    you know, give me a call. And then there's other advisors that'll say, you know,

    395
    00:19:13.160 --> 00:19:16.840
    I'll meet you with you twice a year and we'll review your portfolio and if

    396
    00:19:16.840 --> 00:19:19.040
    everything looks good, then we'll, I'll talk to you in six months.

    397
    00:19:19.540 --> 00:19:20.600
    And if you're okay with that,

    398
    00:19:20.860 --> 00:19:24.080
    and you at least you know that going into the relationship, I think where,

    399
    00:19:24.080 --> 00:19:25.360
    where people get burned is they,

    400
    00:19:25.360 --> 00:19:28.440
    they think they're gonna get more outta the relationship than they're getting.

    401
    00:19:28.700 --> 00:19:31.840
    And a lot of times it's just slimy cuz of lack of transparency.

    402
    00:19:32.290 --> 00:19:34.120
    Right. And I think that transparency is a,

    403
    00:19:34.360 --> 00:19:36.400
    a tremendous way for advisors to build trust.

    404
    00:19:36.400 --> 00:19:38.440
    Cause it's all based on trust at the beginning of the Absolutely.

    405
    00:19:38.440 --> 00:19:39.640
    At the end of the day anyway, so Absolutely.

    406
    00:19:40.340 --> 00:19:41.800
    And it's also important, Tom,

    407
    00:19:41.800 --> 00:19:44.720
    to remember that as you're looking for a financial advisor, it's a,

    408
    00:19:45.100 --> 00:19:48.680
    you think of it as a, a mutual interview. It's, it's, you know, they're,

    409
    00:19:48.680 --> 00:19:51.000
    they're looking to see if you're gonna be a good client for them,

    410
    00:19:51.510 --> 00:19:54.000
    just like you're looking to see if they're gonna be a good advisor for you.

    411
    00:19:54.340 --> 00:19:57.480
    And so it's important that, that, uh, that a, your values are aligned.

    412
    00:19:57.550 --> 00:19:59.520
    It's important to look for that full transparency,

    413
    00:19:59.700 --> 00:20:02.440
    but it's also important that it's, you know, somebody that you can connect with.

    414
    00:20:02.810 --> 00:20:06.600
    Absolutely. Absolutely. And, um, every investor's unique. Mm-hmm.

    415
    00:20:06.700 --> 00:20:09.640
    And every advisor's unique in, in trying to find that match,

    416
    00:20:09.720 --> 00:20:12.800
    I think is very important. So for our listeners out there, uh,

    417
    00:20:12.800 --> 00:20:14.720
    those that might be looking for financial advisor,

    418
    00:20:14.720 --> 00:20:17.360
    make sure that you're getting, uh, transparency into costs.

    419
    00:20:17.870 --> 00:20:20.400
    Make sure you're getting transparency into value proposition.

    420
    00:20:20.790 --> 00:20:25.560
    Make sure that you're using someone who is maybe not necessarily earning sales,

    421
    00:20:26.300 --> 00:20:30.880
    uh, charges or sales commissions, uh, but actually giving fee for advice,

    422
    00:20:30.970 --> 00:20:34.840
    which eliminates conflicts of interest. Um, and so I think that's, there's a,

    423
    00:20:34.840 --> 00:20:39.040
    there's a lot there for our listeners to digest. JT, I want to thank you for,

    424
    00:20:39.100 --> 00:20:41.560
    for joining us here today. It's been a pleasure talking to

    425
    00:20:41.560 --> 00:20:43.200
    You. This has been a great time. We gotta do this more often.

    426
    00:20:43.250 --> 00:20:46.920
    Absolutely. We'd love to have you back on the show. Uh, so in closing,

    427
    00:20:47.040 --> 00:20:50.800
    I wanna thank the listeners for, for chiming into this, uh, podcast. And, uh,

    428
    00:20:50.800 --> 00:20:52.840
    we'll get you at the next one. And, uh,

    429
    00:20:52.860 --> 00:20:56.480
    for those of you who are looking for our, some of our previous episodes, uh,

    430
    00:20:56.480 --> 00:20:58.720
    you can find them wherever you're currently finding your podcast.

    431
    00:20:58.940 --> 00:21:01.840
    So thank you so much for your time and, uh, I'll see you at the next one.

    432
    00:21:01.960 --> 00:21:03.600
    Symmetry Partners llc,

    433
    00:21:03.830 --> 00:21:07.760
    it's an investment advisor firm registered with the Securities and Exchange

    434
    00:21:07.760 --> 00:21:08.580
    Commission.

    435
    00:21:08.580 --> 00:21:13.280
    The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered or

    436
    00:21:13.720 --> 00:21:16.760
    excluded or exempted from registration requirements.

    437
    00:21:17.160 --> 00:21:21.720
    Registration of an investment advisor does not imply any specific level of skill

    438
    00:21:21.740 --> 00:21:26.240
    or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the

    439
    00:21:26.240 --> 00:21:26.940
    commission.

    440
    00:21:26.940 --> 00:21:30.080
    No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment,

    441
    00:21:30.290 --> 00:21:32.560
    investment strategy, product,

    442
    00:21:33.060 --> 00:21:37.320
    or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in

    443
    00:21:37.320 --> 00:21:41.670
    this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy,

    444
    00:21:41.920 --> 00:21:46.910
    there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss due to various

    445
    00:21:46.910 --> 00:21:51.390
    factors including changing market conditions and or applicable laws.

    446
    00:21:52.090 --> 00:21:56.430
    The content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.

    447
    00:21:56.770 --> 00:22:00.790
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only.

    448
    00:22:01.110 --> 00:22:01.850
    Moreover,

    449
    00:22:01.850 --> 00:22:05.790
    you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this

    450
    00:22:05.990 --> 00:22:09.990
    material serves as the receipt of or as a substitute for

    451
    00:22:10.350 --> 00:22:12.390
    personalized investment advice.

  • Alternative Investments are not just "cool" or intriguing products to own. In truth, they have the potential to help you endure tumultuous markets. In this episode, we are joined once again by Philip McDonald, CFA, CAIA, Managing Director of Research Investments & Portfolio Manager, to discuss how Alternative Investments can mitigate risk in your portfolio.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    0
    00:00:06.890 --> 00:00:09.120
    Hello, this is Tom Romano with Unfiltered Finance.

    1
    00:00:09.270 --> 00:00:13.400
    Welcome back to part two on our discussion of alternative investments here with

    2
    00:00:13.400 --> 00:00:14.360
    us as Phil McDonald,

    3
    00:00:14.430 --> 00:00:18.720
    portfolio Manager and managing Director of Investments at Symmetry Partners.

    4
    00:00:18.720 --> 00:00:19.760
    Phil, welcome back.

    5
    00:00:20.020 --> 00:00:21.400
    Thanks for having me back. Tom,

    6
    00:00:21.880 --> 00:00:24.880
    I think we're getting a lot of questions from investors and and advisors because

    7
    00:00:24.880 --> 00:00:28.000
    of the fact that you look at the performance of some of these alternative asset

    8
    00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:30.920
    classes in a year like 2022. However,

    9
    00:00:31.640 --> 00:00:35.680
    I think we would caution our listeners to, to not chase returns,

    10
    00:00:35.860 --> 00:00:40.040
    and it's more of a strategic allocation that you wanna hold in your portfolio

    11
    00:00:40.140 --> 00:00:41.120
    for a long duration.

    12
    00:00:41.600 --> 00:00:44.920
    I would totally agree with that. And, and you have other considerations here,

    13
    00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:48.280
    like broadly speaking, the expectation of the 60 40 portfolio,

    14
    00:00:48.300 --> 00:00:49.920
    the return on the so-called 60 port,

    15
    00:00:49.930 --> 00:00:54.680
    40 portfolio is likely going to be below average for in, in the near future.

    16
    00:00:54.780 --> 00:00:56.320
    So you start to think about like, okay,

    17
    00:00:56.320 --> 00:01:00.200
    my traditional portfolio isn't gonna return, you know, the 40 year average,

    18
    00:01:00.350 --> 00:01:03.080
    what we saw decades ago. So where else might I be,

    19
    00:01:03.080 --> 00:01:06.280
    might be able to go for returns and diversification? So you,

    20
    00:01:06.300 --> 00:01:10.440
    you have that inflation surprises, you have increased correlation of,

    21
    00:01:10.460 --> 00:01:12.920
    of traditional asset classes in the recent past. You know,

    22
    00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:16.360
    of all these things kind of pointing to the benefit of having a diversified

    23
    00:01:16.710 --> 00:01:18.880
    alternative strategy. And I would agree with you,

    24
    00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:22.280
    I think you were alluding to the strength of 2022. It was,

    25
    00:01:22.300 --> 00:01:24.880
    it was a very good year for certain alternative strategies.

    26
    00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:27.880
    I would encourage people to think of that as an outlier year like that.

    27
    00:01:27.880 --> 00:01:31.280
    That's not a year that can necessarily happen again unless all the bad things

    28
    00:01:31.280 --> 00:01:36.080
    that happen in the equity and fixed income markets and with inflation kind of

    29
    00:01:36.490 --> 00:01:40.720
    recur. So I, I would encourage people to almost think in terms of sharp ratio,

    30
    00:01:40.770 --> 00:01:43.600
    right? So an excess return for a given volatility,

    31
    00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:47.320
    a sharp ratio above 0.5, getting to maybe a 0.8, is,

    32
    00:01:47.340 --> 00:01:50.320
    is the type of realm I think you should think of for,

    33
    00:01:50.380 --> 00:01:53.000
    for a diversified alternative strategy. And,

    34
    00:01:53.180 --> 00:01:55.160
    and to kind of put specifics on that,

    35
    00:01:55.380 --> 00:02:00.360
    so something that has is managed to a 10% volatility or standard deviation that

    36
    00:02:00.360 --> 00:02:05.240
    would be a five to 8% excess return on the risk-free rate. So,

    37
    00:02:05.660 --> 00:02:10.080
    so you know, you're talking single digit excess returns for, uh,

    38
    00:02:10.200 --> 00:02:14.040
    a strategy that's scaled to a 10% volatility. So, you know,

    39
    00:02:14.100 --> 00:02:16.480
    to take people out of this expectation of,

    40
    00:02:16.780 --> 00:02:21.640
    of a home run year kind of happening again, it's less likely to happen again.

    41
    00:02:21.660 --> 00:02:22.493
    Gotcha.

    42
    00:02:22.900 --> 00:02:25.560
    Um, just to clarify some of that, because I think that's some,

    43
    00:02:25.670 --> 00:02:28.880
    some very important advice there. When we talk sharp ratio,

    44
    00:02:28.880 --> 00:02:32.000
    the way I look at that is bang for your buck. Are you,

    45
    00:02:32.020 --> 00:02:35.960
    are you getting the return for the risk that you are taking?

    46
    00:02:36.300 --> 00:02:37.720
    And the higher the sharp ratio,

    47
    00:02:37.740 --> 00:02:39.800
    the greater the return is for the risk that you're taking.

    48
    00:02:40.540 --> 00:02:44.800
    And so when we're talking about, you know, years like 2022, which is an outlier,

    49
    00:02:44.810 --> 00:02:46.640
    which I would agree, you know,

    50
    00:02:46.640 --> 00:02:51.640
    investors could have alternatives in their portfolio for years with a trade off

    51
    00:02:51.640 --> 00:02:51.880
    being,

    52
    00:02:51.880 --> 00:02:55.720
    you might be getting single digit returns while the markets may be producing

    53
    00:02:55.720 --> 00:02:59.930
    double digit returns. We don't know when the next 20, 22, 2 is gonna happen.

    54
    00:03:00.420 --> 00:03:05.280
    But having an allocation of those alts will certainly help weather that storm.

    55
    00:03:05.820 --> 00:03:07.280
    Uh, uh, totally agree. Yes.

    56
    00:03:07.380 --> 00:03:11.160
    So I think a misconception here, and this is just from my conversations with,

    57
    00:03:11.160 --> 00:03:13.600
    with advisors, investors alike, they think alternative strategies,

    58
    00:03:13.600 --> 00:03:15.000
    they think returns. Mm-hmm.

    59
    00:03:15.080 --> 00:03:18.440
    They think even tactical shifts into and hour. Exactly. Yeah.

    60
    00:03:18.460 --> 00:03:22.000
    But what I'm hearing you say that this is more of a risk mitigating strategy

    61
    00:03:22.190 --> 00:03:24.000
    than a return reaching strategy.

    62
    00:03:24.520 --> 00:03:28.080
    I think it's, it's strongly risk mitigating from a diversification standpoint,

    63
    00:03:28.260 --> 00:03:30.320
    but I'm not quite sure how

    64
    00:03:31.990 --> 00:03:34.760
    Much you have to give up in returns. Okay. I mean, it,

    65
    00:03:34.880 --> 00:03:38.640
    I I wouldn't necessarily say it, it's gonna hurt you over the long term.

    66
    00:03:38.760 --> 00:03:42.240
    I think you need to think about the right portfolio you, you want to be in. And,

    67
    00:03:42.460 --> 00:03:46.000
    you know, I dunno if you had a question here, but, uh, you know, there,

    68
    00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:50.200
    there are some very specific use cases that I think make sense and that would be

    69
    00:03:50.520 --> 00:03:52.960
    managing just the life cycle,

    70
    00:03:53.380 --> 00:03:58.280
    how financial plans and asset allocations change as a person ages. Again,

    71
    00:03:58.380 --> 00:04:03.080
    we, we have a finite kinda life here where we're earning and spending and maybe

    72
    00:04:03.080 --> 00:04:08.080
    bequeathing and then preferences. So theoretically, as someone ages,

    73
    00:04:08.080 --> 00:04:11.640
    they're the, the risk of their portfolio should, should come down over time.

    74
    00:04:11.640 --> 00:04:13.680
    They're converting their human capital,

    75
    00:04:13.690 --> 00:04:17.200
    their potential for earning during their career into financial capital.

    76
    00:04:17.200 --> 00:04:20.160
    They're investing that hopefully they're being thoughtful about the

    77
    00:04:20.160 --> 00:04:23.760
    diversification of, of, of those kind of two buckets and say,

    78
    00:04:23.760 --> 00:04:25.680
    equity beta should come down as you age.

    79
    00:04:25.930 --> 00:04:28.080
    Where do you go with that allocation in your portfolio?

    80
    00:04:28.640 --> 00:04:32.240
    Historically and traditionally, someone would say, oh, fixed, fixed income,

    81
    00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:35.880
    of course. But we've been seeing for a decade, you and I right,

    82
    00:04:35.930 --> 00:04:37.680
    we're we're both nodding and smiling.

    83
    00:04:38.250 --> 00:04:43.120
    There have been times when people were strongly opposed to increasing the fixed

    84
    00:04:43.120 --> 00:04:47.120
    income allocation in their portfolio. So if it's just, you know, gas and break,

    85
    00:04:47.180 --> 00:04:49.360
    you know, what do you do? You, you know,

    86
    00:04:49.360 --> 00:04:52.720
    we've seen investors and advisors kind of freeze and, and say, oh,

    87
    00:04:52.720 --> 00:04:56.080
    there's no solution here. But this third or fourth, right,

    88
    00:04:56.080 --> 00:05:00.560
    with cash in the consideration bucket of allocation really opens things up.

    89
    00:05:00.620 --> 00:05:04.480
    You can take down beta risk, uh, equity beta,

    90
    00:05:04.500 --> 00:05:09.000
    and you can allocate and diversify not only into fixed income.

    91
    00:05:09.300 --> 00:05:10.100
    Gotcha.

    92
    00:05:10.100 --> 00:05:13.640
    And you, you know, we, I joke around saying it depends, right? We,

    93
    00:05:13.660 --> 00:05:18.080
    we say that a lot here, um, because I also think it's a perfect portfolio.

    94
    00:05:18.340 --> 00:05:21.200
    You know, we, we look at portfolios as being a series of trade offs.

    95
    00:05:21.580 --> 00:05:23.360
    And so I immediately think, well gosh, you know,

    96
    00:05:23.360 --> 00:05:25.000
    if you don't really give up any of the return,

    97
    00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:29.480
    but you can definitely mitigate some of the risks through sharp ratio,

    98
    00:05:29.480 --> 00:05:32.920
    as you said, like looking at that particular statistic, who,

    99
    00:05:32.920 --> 00:05:35.960
    what are the trade-offs of, of investing in alternatives? And,

    100
    00:05:35.960 --> 00:05:38.920
    and immediately I think, well, well, you're still, there's still cost,

    101
    00:05:39.030 --> 00:05:42.840
    even though you can get lower cost alternative exposures,

    102
    00:05:42.840 --> 00:05:47.400
    there's still a cost element to that. Um, and also, you know,

    103
    00:05:47.400 --> 00:05:50.320
    we talk a lot about tracking error on the behavioral side, right?

    104
    00:05:50.380 --> 00:05:53.680
    If you're gonna add an alternative asset class to your portfolio,

    105
    00:05:54.660 --> 00:05:58.080
    but you're honed in on the s and p 500, you're,

    106
    00:05:58.080 --> 00:06:00.040
    you're not gonna be tracking that index.

    107
    00:06:00.690 --> 00:06:01.220
    Right?

    108
    00:06:01.220 --> 00:06:03.120
    Is that, is that a correct way of thinking about it?

    109
    00:06:03.370 --> 00:06:04.040
    Absolutely.

    110
    00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:07.600
    And I'm glad you brought that up because not only are alternatives difficult to

    111
    00:06:07.600 --> 00:06:11.720
    benchmark, there are some indices that I think, um, are,

    112
    00:06:11.740 --> 00:06:16.320
    are relevant to a diversified, you know, conservative strategy. We, we,

    113
    00:06:17.220 --> 00:06:19.880
    you know, we run an alternative strategy, uh,

    114
    00:06:19.880 --> 00:06:24.120
    in different forms that is not seeking to, to be very volatile, right?

    115
    00:06:24.180 --> 00:06:28.040
    So sub under that 10% volatility that I gave as,

    116
    00:06:28.180 --> 00:06:32.680
    as the example to conceptualize a sharp ratio. So we, we,

    117
    00:06:32.740 --> 00:06:34.560
    we don't even believe in a, uh,

    118
    00:06:34.560 --> 00:06:38.040
    that high level of volatility in an alternative strategy. Um,

    119
    00:06:38.060 --> 00:06:39.280
    but you raise a very good point.

    120
    00:06:39.300 --> 00:06:42.120
    So not only are alternatives difficult to benchmark,

    121
    00:06:42.740 --> 00:06:44.880
    but if you have alternatives in your portfolio,

    122
    00:06:45.860 --> 00:06:49.880
    the appropriate benchmark for your portfolio should reflect

    123
    00:06:50.660 --> 00:06:55.480
    the allocation you have. If it's 50% diversified equity,

    124
    00:06:56.770 --> 00:06:59.800
    40% diversified fixed income, and 10% alts,

    125
    00:07:00.380 --> 00:07:04.880
    you should probably benchmark yourself to a blended benchmark of a

    126
    00:07:04.880 --> 00:07:07.960
    50, 40 10 mix of relevant indices.

    127
    00:07:08.540 --> 00:07:11.920
    Not just look to the s and p 500, because again,

    128
    00:07:11.940 --> 00:07:14.440
    you probably have a 0.5 beta in that portfolio.

    129
    00:07:14.980 --> 00:07:18.440
    You don't want to compare yourself to something that is a 1.0 beta.

    130
    00:07:18.790 --> 00:07:22.880
    Sure, sure. Absolutely. And you know, we, we talk a lot about, on this podcast,

    131
    00:07:23.480 --> 00:07:26.680
    a lot of folks look at benchmarks to look at the performance, their portfolio,

    132
    00:07:26.740 --> 00:07:28.800
    and I think that makes a lot of sense. But the true one,

    133
    00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:32.000
    true benchmark is are you hitting your goals from a financial planning

    134
    00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:34.800
    standpoint? Right? And so I think that's a better way to, to,

    135
    00:07:34.820 --> 00:07:38.640
    to look at it versus just making sure that you may or may not be

    136
    00:07:38.990 --> 00:07:40.520
    outperforming the s and p,

    137
    00:07:40.520 --> 00:07:44.400
    which is a very visible benchmark out in the world today.

    138
    00:07:44.420 --> 00:07:47.560
    And we can think the media outlets for that certainly. Right.

    139
    00:07:47.740 --> 00:07:50.680
    So let's talk a little about, uh, allocation to alts, right?

    140
    00:07:50.680 --> 00:07:54.280
    Let's say you have an investor, let's say it's 60% stock, 40% bond,

    141
    00:07:54.280 --> 00:07:58.400
    maybe a small cash position in there. How should that investor consider adding,

    142
    00:07:58.820 --> 00:08:01.720
    uh, alternatives to the portfolio? Is there a maximum amount you would put in?

    143
    00:08:01.740 --> 00:08:04.720
    Is there a minimum amount? Would you take it from the stock side?

    144
    00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:07.440
    Would you take it from the bond side? How does that work? And how should our,

    145
    00:08:07.460 --> 00:08:10.320
    our listeners be conceptualizing adding that asset

    146
    00:08:10.320 --> 00:08:13.720
    Class? So we, we have some opinions here, but I think in the end, it's,

    147
    00:08:13.720 --> 00:08:17.960
    it's gonna be what is acceptable to the investor and what their financial

    148
    00:08:17.960 --> 00:08:22.520
    advisors would recommend start the starting point matters.

    149
    00:08:22.900 --> 00:08:27.200
    So if you're exceptionally conservative to start, say you're,

    150
    00:08:28.320 --> 00:08:31.980
    you know, 10% equity in 90% fixed income,

    151
    00:08:32.260 --> 00:08:37.020
    I think taking it ha having a a higher allocation alt might

    152
    00:08:37.450 --> 00:08:41.780
    make more sense than if you were starting from the other end. So, uh,

    153
    00:08:41.840 --> 00:08:45.500
    in terms of the distribution of returns and, and you know,

    154
    00:08:45.500 --> 00:08:47.980
    the level of volatility of a diversified AL strategy,

    155
    00:08:48.250 --> 00:08:51.180
    it's a little bit more similar to fixed income. It's, it's,

    156
    00:08:51.260 --> 00:08:54.540
    I like to say those returns are fueled by different things. You know, it's not,

    157
    00:08:55.260 --> 00:08:59.200
    you know, duration and credit risk and illiquidity type of stuff.

    158
    00:08:59.270 --> 00:09:02.840
    It's other drivers that, that give you returns and alternatives.

    159
    00:09:02.860 --> 00:09:06.480
    But our rules of thumb, which, you know, are for people to take or leave,

    160
    00:09:06.490 --> 00:09:11.000
    would be maybe up to about 25% if you're starting from a very conservative, uh,

    161
    00:09:11.000 --> 00:09:14.800
    portfolio. And if you're starting from a very aggressive portfolio,

    162
    00:09:14.830 --> 00:09:18.240
    just say someone's a hundred percent equity invested in says, ah,

    163
    00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:22.160
    I want to add malts to this portfolio, but I don't like fixed income. Um,

    164
    00:09:22.360 --> 00:09:23.480
    I know a few of those, maybe,

    165
    00:09:24.210 --> 00:09:26.560
    Maybe something more in the realm of 15%,

    166
    00:09:26.800 --> 00:09:31.560
    I think lower than 10% allocation of anything to the portfolio is gonna have a,

    167
    00:09:32.120 --> 00:09:35.760
    a, a limited effect on, on the outcome, right?

    168
    00:09:35.940 --> 00:09:40.200
    So 10 percent's probably our general starting point to add something and, and,

    169
    00:09:40.260 --> 00:09:43.840
    and see, uh, beneficial effect to the portfolio and,

    170
    00:09:43.980 --> 00:09:46.080
    and where we've landed on where to fund it from.

    171
    00:09:46.080 --> 00:09:47.640
    So I didn't forget that part of your question,

    172
    00:09:48.290 --> 00:09:52.560
    where believers in prorata from the,

    173
    00:09:52.700 --> 00:09:53.720
    the asset allocation,

    174
    00:09:54.260 --> 00:09:58.080
    so if you're a 60 40 investor and you put say,

    175
    00:09:58.080 --> 00:09:59.560
    20% alternatives,

    176
    00:10:00.010 --> 00:10:04.880
    60% of that should be probably funded from a reduction in inequity

    177
    00:10:05.060 --> 00:10:07.960
    and 40% from a reduction in fixed. And they go, again,

    178
    00:10:07.960 --> 00:10:12.320
    these are starting rules of thumbs. I I am very familiar with people who,

    179
    00:10:12.910 --> 00:10:17.400
    because that returns distribution to alts, you know, the volatility and the,

    180
    00:10:17.540 --> 00:10:22.520
    and kind of the average return to the distribution to alts is a little

    181
    00:10:22.520 --> 00:10:24.520
    more similar to fixed income than it is to equity.

    182
    00:10:24.760 --> 00:10:29.160
    I know folks who want to take 100% on a fixed income, that is an approach,

    183
    00:10:29.420 --> 00:10:33.800
    but if you think about that, you've done nothing to reduce your equity risk.

    184
    00:10:34.220 --> 00:10:37.920
    So if someone is, again, aging life cycle is a consideration here,

    185
    00:10:38.760 --> 00:10:41.840
    diversifying both systematic, traditional,

    186
    00:10:41.840 --> 00:10:43.600
    systematic exposures of equity and fixed,

    187
    00:10:44.660 --> 00:10:48.160
    we think taking from both makes a lot of sense to fund that ALT's position.

    188
    00:10:48.410 --> 00:10:50.640
    There are exceptions, you know, there, there are, you know,

    189
    00:10:50.690 --> 00:10:54.560
    there are people who have different savings or different, you know,

    190
    00:10:54.560 --> 00:10:58.880
    sources of income, maybe people with three pensions, you know, like who, uh,

    191
    00:10:58.980 --> 00:11:02.280
    who look a little different from an average investor. So again,

    192
    00:11:02.280 --> 00:11:04.840
    individual specifics need to come into play, but those,

    193
    00:11:04.840 --> 00:11:07.720
    those are my starting rules of thumb in a vacuum.

    194
    00:11:08.070 --> 00:11:09.160
    Well, that makes a lot of sense,

    195
    00:11:09.160 --> 00:11:13.640
    especially if you're looking at alternatives as a third leg to the stool, right.

    196
    00:11:13.660 --> 00:11:14.600
    Stocks and bonds.

    197
    00:11:14.740 --> 00:11:18.160
    And if the third category is going to be alternative asset classes or

    198
    00:11:18.160 --> 00:11:20.760
    alternative strategies, it should come out prorata.

    199
    00:11:21.150 --> 00:11:24.160
    It's not that the ALS are taking the place of equities or fixed income,

    200
    00:11:24.190 --> 00:11:26.880
    it's something completely, completely different in the portfolio.

    201
    00:11:27.300 --> 00:11:28.133
    Yep.

    202
    00:11:28.230 --> 00:11:32.480
    Fantastic. So, um, Phil, I wanna thank you so much for your time. This is, uh,

    203
    00:11:32.500 --> 00:11:36.440
    uh, super enlightening and just to kind of recap what we discussed, uh,

    204
    00:11:36.440 --> 00:11:38.000
    for our listeners, um,

    205
    00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:42.040
    alternative investments are a great way to diversify a portfolio beyond stocks,

    206
    00:11:42.280 --> 00:11:43.113
    bonds, and cash.

    207
    00:11:43.690 --> 00:11:48.400
    There are ways to get exposures to liquid alternative strategies through

    208
    00:11:48.670 --> 00:11:50.920
    ETFs and mutual funds. With that should,

    209
    00:11:51.020 --> 00:11:54.920
    you should expect a level of transparency to make sure you are getting those

    210
    00:11:54.920 --> 00:11:59.720
    diversification benefits and, uh, certainly, uh, liquidity being a,

    211
    00:11:59.980 --> 00:12:04.240
    uh, a factor there as well. And you know, whether or not alternatives are,

    212
    00:12:04.240 --> 00:12:07.560
    are suitable for you, as we always say and unfiltered finance. You know,

    213
    00:12:07.560 --> 00:12:10.320
    the best advice we can give is to always work with a financial advisor or

    214
    00:12:10.320 --> 00:12:14.760
    financial professional that can take a look at your own personal situation,

    215
    00:12:15.060 --> 00:12:18.880
    assess that situation, and, uh, make sure that they recommend, uh,

    216
    00:12:18.880 --> 00:12:21.520
    an asset allocation, uh, that's suitable for you.

    217
    00:12:21.810 --> 00:12:24.520
    Thank you listeners for joining us today. Uh, Phil, once again,

    218
    00:12:24.870 --> 00:12:27.760
    it's always fun having you on the show. We'll certainly have you back. Great.

    219
    00:12:27.760 --> 00:12:28.593
    Thanks for having me.

    220
    00:12:29.020 --> 00:12:31.160
    For those of you who are looking for additional information,

    221
    00:12:31.160 --> 00:12:35.920
    you can always visit our [email protected]. Feel free to,

    222
    00:12:36.340 --> 00:12:38.080
    uh, listen to this podcast, uh,

    223
    00:12:38.090 --> 00:12:42.200
    again or access any of our previous podcasts to the, uh,

    224
    00:12:42.330 --> 00:12:44.120
    venue in which you get your podcasts.

    225
    00:12:44.460 --> 00:12:46.440
    So thanks for listening and we'll catch you next time.

    226
    00:12:46.720 --> 00:12:48.360
    Symmetry Partners, llc,

    227
    00:12:49.080 --> 00:12:52.600
    an investment advisor firm registered with the Securities and Exchange

    228
    00:12:52.600 --> 00:12:53.420
    Commission.

    229
    00:12:53.420 --> 00:12:58.120
    The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered or

    230
    00:12:58.560 --> 00:13:01.600
    excluded or exempted from registration requirements.

    231
    00:13:01.960 --> 00:13:06.480
    Registration of an investment advisor does not imply any specific level of skill

    232
    00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:07.313
    or training,

    233
    00:13:07.660 --> 00:13:11.480
    and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the commission.

    234
    00:13:11.780 --> 00:13:14.920
    No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment,

    235
    00:13:15.130 --> 00:13:17.400
    investment strategy, product,

    236
    00:13:17.900 --> 00:13:22.120
    or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in

    237
    00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:26.710
    this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy,

    238
    00:13:26.960 --> 00:13:31.750
    there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss due to various

    239
    00:13:31.750 --> 00:13:36.230
    factors including changing market conditions and or applicable laws.

    240
    00:13:36.930 --> 00:13:41.230
    The content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.

    241
    00:13:41.490 --> 00:13:45.870
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only.

    242
    00:13:45.950 --> 00:13:46.690
    Moreover,

    243
    00:13:46.690 --> 00:13:50.590
    you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this

    244
    00:13:50.830 --> 00:13:54.830
    material serves as the receipt of or as a substitute for

    245
    00:13:55.190 --> 00:13:57.190
    personalized investment advice.

  • Today, we talk about an area of the market that many people have heard of, but haven’t chosen to invest in as of yet. Specifically, we’re talking about “Alternative Investments” - investment strategies that are different from and diversifying to, traditional asset classes. In this first half of this two-part episode, our own Tom Romano is joined by Symmetry’s Phil McDonald, CFA, CAIA, Managing Director of Research Investments & Portfolio Manager, to further define what “Alternative Investments” are, and why you may want to consider their potential benefits.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice. Transcript

    0
    00:00:06.730 --> 00:00:10.400
    Hello and welcome to Unfiltered Finance. This is your host, Tom Romano.

    1
    00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:12.160
    Thank you for joining us. Uh,

    2
    00:00:12.160 --> 00:00:15.000
    we have a special episode today where we want to talk about, uh,

    3
    00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:19.400
    an area of the market that, uh, a lot of investors have probably heard of, uh,

    4
    00:00:19.620 --> 00:00:22.640
    and probably most investors don't have a lot of exposure to.

    5
    00:00:23.180 --> 00:00:25.200
    And that is alternative investments.

    6
    00:00:25.780 --> 00:00:29.200
    And I have the perfect guest for us here today. Uh, Phil McDonald,

    7
    00:00:29.300 --> 00:00:33.040
    who is a portfolio manager and the managing director of investments at Symmetry

    8
    00:00:33.040 --> 00:00:35.360
    Partners, and is the resident expert on,

    9
    00:00:35.580 --> 00:00:39.360
    on alternative investing here at Symmetry. So Phil, thanks for joining us today.

    10
    00:00:39.700 --> 00:00:41.280
    Thanks for having me. I'm happy to be here.

    11
    00:00:41.900 --> 00:00:45.080
    So I kinda wanna start very high level, Phil, um,

    12
    00:00:45.080 --> 00:00:49.200
    because I think alternative investments is a, is a very, very broad topic.

    13
    00:00:49.400 --> 00:00:51.760
    I mean, it can cover things, uh,

    14
    00:00:51.760 --> 00:00:55.760
    such as precious metals to hedge fund strategies, um,

    15
    00:00:55.780 --> 00:00:59.760
    all the way down to things like NFTs, right? Or, or even, you know,

    16
    00:00:59.760 --> 00:01:04.240
    card collecting to an extent, right? So if you could just very high level give,

    17
    00:01:04.240 --> 00:01:08.520
    give us a very broad definition, uh, on your view on alternative investing,

    18
    00:01:08.520 --> 00:01:09.020
    please.

    19
    00:01:09.020 --> 00:01:09.720
    And thank you that,

    20
    00:01:09.720 --> 00:01:14.680
    that is a highly relevant question because alternatives is one of those labels

    21
    00:01:14.680 --> 00:01:17.760
    and investing that doesn't have, uh,

    22
    00:01:17.880 --> 00:01:21.080
    a perfectly agreed upon definition. I think, you know,

    23
    00:01:21.080 --> 00:01:24.640
    certain people hear it and they think different things. Um,

    24
    00:01:24.800 --> 00:01:29.200
    I think a useful definition to keep in mind is really, uh,

    25
    00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:33.080
    the starting point is anything that is an investment strategy that is different

    26
    00:01:33.390 --> 00:01:37.800
    from or diversifying to traditional asset classes that is

    27
    00:01:38.100 --> 00:01:41.080
    equity and fixed income, right? Um,

    28
    00:01:41.180 --> 00:01:45.440
    but I think you can't really stop there because, you know,

    29
    00:01:45.460 --> 00:01:48.840
    you called attention to, to certain ideas that, you know,

    30
    00:01:48.840 --> 00:01:52.040
    people might think of if, you know, you mentioned alternative investing,

    31
    00:01:52.320 --> 00:01:54.960
    you know, baseball cards or, you know,

    32
    00:01:54.960 --> 00:01:58.520
    a lot of interesting different artwork choices. Yeah. We've talked about,

    33
    00:01:58.520 --> 00:01:58.840
    talked about

    34
    00:01:58.840 --> 00:01:59.270
    That before.

    35
    00:01:59.270 --> 00:02:04.080
    Cars, uh, timber farmland, you know, these are all, some,

    36
    00:02:04.320 --> 00:02:06.640
    a lot of people think real estate, right? Which I think we could,

    37
    00:02:06.640 --> 00:02:07.600
    we could debate that one,

    38
    00:02:07.700 --> 00:02:12.520
    but I think not only should the investment strategy be different, but there,

    39
    00:02:12.530 --> 00:02:17.240
    there should be kind of an economic rationale for why you might

    40
    00:02:17.510 --> 00:02:21.480
    earn a return on that different strategy. And, and more specifically,

    41
    00:02:22.670 --> 00:02:27.560
    where's the premium coming from? Right? So I think very quickly for me,

    42
    00:02:27.560 --> 00:02:31.600
    that collapses down more to specific liquid,

    43
    00:02:32.380 --> 00:02:34.560
    uh, investment in trading strategies.

    44
    00:02:34.950 --> 00:02:38.800
    Sometimes based on themes we're al already familiar with in,

    45
    00:02:38.820 --> 00:02:40.640
    in asset classes we're already familiar with.

    46
    00:02:40.640 --> 00:02:45.480
    You don't necessarily have to go really far a field to find an

    47
    00:02:45.760 --> 00:02:49.480
    addition to a portfolio that will, will make a difference in terms of, you know,

    48
    00:02:49.480 --> 00:02:51.920
    adding an alternative, uh, investment exposure.

    49
    00:02:52.630 --> 00:02:55.560
    Sure. Thank you for that. And, um, you know,

    50
    00:02:55.560 --> 00:02:58.680
    I think it is that broad of a definition, right? I mean, uh,

    51
    00:02:58.990 --> 00:03:02.800
    just to sort of clarify for, for our listeners, um,

    52
    00:03:02.860 --> 00:03:06.000
    the word alternative means alternative, you said traditional asset classes,

    53
    00:03:06.460 --> 00:03:08.040
    stocks, bonds.

    54
    00:03:08.610 --> 00:03:13.080
    There is a correlation benefit to owning both stocks and bonds in a portfolio

    55
    00:03:13.270 --> 00:03:16.840
    Most years. Most years. Yeah. We'll get to that. We will get to that. Um,

    56
    00:03:17.390 --> 00:03:20.640
    however, um, you know, alternatives, to me it is a,

    57
    00:03:20.640 --> 00:03:25.280
    it's a correlation story in, in all of those investments, if you will,

    58
    00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:30.200
    whether it's cars, stamps, baseball cards, commodities,

    59
    00:03:30.670 --> 00:03:35.480
    they are going to have or should have some sort of diversification benefit.

    60
    00:03:35.540 --> 00:03:37.000
    And that's the purpose of it, right?

    61
    00:03:37.750 --> 00:03:39.200
    Totally. You, you nailed it.

    62
    00:03:39.260 --> 00:03:44.120
    The diversification benefit of an alternative strategy performing alternatively,

    63
    00:03:44.130 --> 00:03:46.480
    right? So if you wanna get a little bit geeky, you know,

    64
    00:03:46.480 --> 00:03:50.160
    you can think about something whose return stream looks different. So, you know,

    65
    00:03:50.220 --> 00:03:54.920
    low correlation and expected return from that, you know, economic logic,

    66
    00:03:55.030 --> 00:03:58.760
    that underlying fundamental theme as to if I do this trading strategy,

    67
    00:03:58.880 --> 00:04:03.760
    I should expect a return, hopefully lower volatility than, than say,

    68
    00:04:03.920 --> 00:04:08.840
    a equity market. So right there, you, you can talk about high sharp ratios or,

    69
    00:04:08.860 --> 00:04:12.560
    you know, high excess returns relative to the volatility you're talking about.

    70
    00:04:12.780 --> 00:04:17.760
    And, and absolutely diversification is the benefit. Very often, I, I, you know,

    71
    00:04:17.900 --> 00:04:21.520
    use the, um, analogy of, you know, a third bucket of diversification.

    72
    00:04:21.540 --> 00:04:23.840
    All you thought really all you had was two, well,

    73
    00:04:23.840 --> 00:04:27.760
    there's this third bucket you might want to consider for some clients. And,

    74
    00:04:27.820 --> 00:04:31.240
    and one, one thing I want to clarify here on, on this topic while we're here,

    75
    00:04:31.710 --> 00:04:35.040
    most of these strategies are not a hedge,

    76
    00:04:35.500 --> 00:04:37.360
    diversification is not a hedge.

    77
    00:04:37.820 --> 00:04:41.000
    So if you're diversified with regard to, you know,

    78
    00:04:41.020 --> 00:04:45.600
    equity markets and volatility, it doesn't mean when equities go down 10%,

    79
    00:04:45.780 --> 00:04:49.680
    you go up 10%. It's not that directly, you know,

    80
    00:04:49.950 --> 00:04:53.360
    inverse of a relationship. It's unrelated, you know,

    81
    00:04:53.360 --> 00:04:58.240
    it's not sensitive to what the equity or fixed income market hopefully is doing.

    82
    00:04:58.420 --> 00:05:00.080
    That's really what diversification is.

    83
    00:05:00.380 --> 00:05:03.360
    So it's not the taking the, the counterpoint, if you will, right?

    84
    00:05:03.390 --> 00:05:08.240
    Like something zigs this must zag, so to speak. Right? And so the idea is, it,

    85
    00:05:08.350 --> 00:05:13.240
    it's not going to behave from a return standpoint like any other,

    86
    00:05:13.260 --> 00:05:17.080
    it shouldn't behave like any other asset classes you currently have in your

    87
    00:05:17.080 --> 00:05:20.680
    portfolio. And I really like the way you put that sort of a, a third bucket,

    88
    00:05:20.680 --> 00:05:24.640
    right? I I maybe even a fourth, right? Because I think of cash. Yeah, exactly.

    89
    00:05:24.700 --> 00:05:29.160
    So, so most investors have cash, bonds and stocks,

    90
    00:05:29.270 --> 00:05:31.120
    most of their 401ks. And so what you're saying,

    91
    00:05:31.120 --> 00:05:35.200
    there's this whole other realm of alternatives that can have

    92
    00:05:36.140 --> 00:05:40.880
    diversification benefits because of the fact that they don't behave like stocks,

    93
    00:05:41.170 --> 00:05:43.120
    bonds, and cash. Correct.

    94
    00:05:43.980 --> 00:05:48.880
    So let's talk a little bit because I think alternatives sometimes get a bad

    95
    00:05:48.980 --> 00:05:52.120
    rap. Um, I think a lot of it has to do with the,

    96
    00:05:52.260 --> 00:05:54.720
    so maybe the broad definition has something to do with it,

    97
    00:05:54.780 --> 00:05:56.920
    but let's just kind of pick it apart with some of the,

    98
    00:05:57.010 --> 00:06:00.920
    the arguments I've heard from, uh, investors and financial advisors alike.

    99
    00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:03.400
    And the first one that comes to mind is cost, right? You know,

    100
    00:06:03.400 --> 00:06:04.040
    you think hedge funds,

    101
    00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:08.160
    you think two 20 or three and 30 where you're the managers earning, you know,

    102
    00:06:08.180 --> 00:06:10.040
    2%, 3% plus a,

    103
    00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:13.360
    a large portion of the profits talk to us a little bit about cost with

    104
    00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:14.090
    alternatives,

    105
    00:06:14.090 --> 00:06:17.920
    Right? And that I think is a fair critique of,

    106
    00:06:18.320 --> 00:06:20.960
    I dunno if I wanna call it a traditional model of alternative investing,

    107
    00:06:20.960 --> 00:06:24.320
    maybe older model where some of this, these strategies started mm-hmm.

    108
    00:06:24.490 --> 00:06:26.840
    Which really only offered in limited partnerships,

    109
    00:06:27.290 --> 00:06:29.760
    which tend to have high minimums, you know,

    110
    00:06:29.760 --> 00:06:33.880
    so only high net worth folks can qualify for them. They're illiquid.

    111
    00:06:34.180 --> 00:06:38.000
    So capital could be tied up for something even up to 10 years opaque,

    112
    00:06:38.060 --> 00:06:41.880
    you're not really sure what the manager is doing and, and expensive, you know,

    113
    00:06:41.880 --> 00:06:42.640
    even, you know,

    114
    00:06:42.640 --> 00:06:46.240
    sometimes you have like fund to funds and feeder funds and you have layers of

    115
    00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:49.440
    fees, and then obviously those, those performance fees come into play as well.

    116
    00:06:50.180 --> 00:06:54.560
    Um, so the good news is that that's not the only way to access alternative

    117
    00:06:54.560 --> 00:06:56.360
    strategies. Now, you,

    118
    00:06:56.580 --> 00:07:00.720
    the investor is able to invest in mutual funds and even ETFs that offer

    119
    00:07:00.950 --> 00:07:04.520
    alternative strategies for the most part, liquid, transparent, you know,

    120
    00:07:04.520 --> 00:07:07.920
    you get all the benefits of, you know, the regulatory requirements of,

    121
    00:07:07.940 --> 00:07:09.880
    of being a fund in these structures.

    122
    00:07:10.580 --> 00:07:14.920
    Not all strategies live well in that liquid structure.

    123
    00:07:15.380 --> 00:07:19.240
    So, you know, you don't have quite literally that list of, you know,

    124
    00:07:19.240 --> 00:07:21.760
    that funny list of all the things we could think of that someone might think of

    125
    00:07:21.760 --> 00:07:25.240
    as, as a good investment. So you, you are more constrained,

    126
    00:07:25.300 --> 00:07:28.760
    but still there's quite a bit to, to choose from. And then, you know,

    127
    00:07:28.760 --> 00:07:29.593
    to your point,

    128
    00:07:29.710 --> 00:07:33.040
    most of those strategies are just gonna have a very straightforward expense

    129
    00:07:33.170 --> 00:07:37.960
    ratio on the fund. It'll be very clear what the investor has to pay on average.

    130
    00:07:38.340 --> 00:07:43.040
    You typically see higher fees than, you know, a traditional say,

    131
    00:07:43.210 --> 00:07:47.320
    index fund for equity or, or, or fixed income. But you,

    132
    00:07:47.320 --> 00:07:51.560
    you're getting something different in, in a well-managed alternative strategy,

    133
    00:07:51.610 --> 00:07:54.280
    Right? And you hit on a couple of of points there, right?

    134
    00:07:54.310 --> 00:07:57.040
    Cost is something that always comes up. And uh,

    135
    00:07:57.200 --> 00:08:01.240
    I understand that even in some of these ETF or mutual fund type vehicles,

    136
    00:08:01.270 --> 00:08:03.280
    that there, there could be a higher layer of cost,

    137
    00:08:03.280 --> 00:08:08.160
    but there are ways to get exposures to these asset classes without paying

    138
    00:08:08.580 --> 00:08:13.480
    two and 20. Mm-hmm. Right. Um, you also mentioned liquidity, right?

    139
    00:08:13.600 --> 00:08:15.080
    I think that gets solved for,

    140
    00:08:15.580 --> 00:08:18.680
    if you're not using a limited partnership sort of vehicle.

    141
    00:08:19.300 --> 00:08:21.880
    If you're using an etf, they're very, very liquid.

    142
    00:08:22.140 --> 00:08:24.520
    So you can get your money whenever you may need it.

    143
    00:08:24.540 --> 00:08:27.800
    But you also hit on something that I think is, I think,

    144
    00:08:27.800 --> 00:08:30.600
    important to investors and it's transparency, right?

    145
    00:08:30.700 --> 00:08:32.880
    The opacity of a hedge fund, traditional,

    146
    00:08:33.100 --> 00:08:37.360
    if I can use the word traditional hedge fund tends to be a little bit, uh,

    147
    00:08:37.370 --> 00:08:41.280
    black boxy, if you will, right? Right. And maybe investors are thinking of,

    148
    00:08:41.620 --> 00:08:44.160
    you know, things like Bernie Madoff or things like that, right?

    149
    00:08:44.160 --> 00:08:45.800
    Where you don't know what's going on under the hood,

    150
    00:08:45.940 --> 00:08:49.440
    but an ETF or a mutual fund,

    151
    00:08:50.260 --> 00:08:54.760
    an ETF specifically, you're gonna get a a lot of transparency in that. Correct?

    152
    00:08:55.030 --> 00:08:55.320
    Yeah,

    153
    00:08:55.320 --> 00:08:55.900
    Absolutely.

    154
    00:08:55.900 --> 00:08:57.080
    So you know exactly what you're holding.

    155
    00:08:57.250 --> 00:09:00.720
    Absolutely. And, and, uh, you've touched upon a point,

    156
    00:09:00.730 --> 00:09:03.560
    which I think is very relevant,

    157
    00:09:03.660 --> 00:09:08.480
    and thankfully there's been an evolution in the industry to kind of bring

    158
    00:09:08.480 --> 00:09:10.960
    attention to some of that. So the,

    159
    00:09:11.100 --> 00:09:14.280
    the idea of a global macro go anywhere,

    160
    00:09:14.410 --> 00:09:19.240
    hedge fund a star manager who, you know, returned a thousand percent last year,

    161
    00:09:19.780 --> 00:09:23.640
    you know, raising funds, just like in telling investors, I'm really smart.

    162
    00:09:23.820 --> 00:09:26.760
    I'm smarter than all the rest. Invest with me.

    163
    00:09:26.790 --> 00:09:29.640
    I'll find whatever the opportunity is globally, you know,

    164
    00:09:29.640 --> 00:09:32.240
    regardless of country or region or asset class. Like,

    165
    00:09:32.360 --> 00:09:36.040
    I will go find that opportunity and I will achieve a higher return. That,

    166
    00:09:36.740 --> 00:09:41.440
    that's certainly something to probably be very careful of, right? He,

    167
    00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:44.920
    he might wanna shy away from that. So over the last, I don't know,

    168
    00:09:44.920 --> 00:09:47.040
    I'll say 25 years or so, there,

    169
    00:09:47.040 --> 00:09:49.840
    there's been light kind of shown upon this idea that, you know,

    170
    00:09:49.840 --> 00:09:52.960
    hedge funds don't hedge, you know, some hedge funds have a lot of beta,

    171
    00:09:52.990 --> 00:09:53.880
    some hedge funds are,

    172
    00:09:54.020 --> 00:09:57.240
    are implementing strategies you can get with liquid strategies. You know,

    173
    00:09:57.240 --> 00:10:00.920
    this idea of hedge fund replication was, was an interesting arm of, uh,

    174
    00:10:00.920 --> 00:10:03.120
    quantitative research. So I, I think for,

    175
    00:10:03.180 --> 00:10:07.000
    for those who are interested and have the time as an alternative investor, you,

    176
    00:10:07.020 --> 00:10:10.880
    you should be able to get from your manager a very specific explanation of

    177
    00:10:11.070 --> 00:10:13.800
    exactly what's happening in the strategy,

    178
    00:10:14.980 --> 00:10:16.480
    why it's an alternative strategy,

    179
    00:10:16.740 --> 00:10:19.440
    why the fee being charged on that strategy makes sense,

    180
    00:10:19.660 --> 00:10:23.320
    how it's diversifying to traditional asset classes. And really, I think at a,

    181
    00:10:23.320 --> 00:10:24.720
    on a very basic level,

    182
    00:10:25.110 --> 00:10:30.040
    confirm you're not paying alternative investment fees for

    183
    00:10:30.270 --> 00:10:32.120
    just call it equity beta, right?

    184
    00:10:32.120 --> 00:10:36.080
    Because we know equity beta is available in really high quality ETFs from

    185
    00:10:36.120 --> 00:10:38.840
    Vanguard for probably three basis points. Yeah.

    186
    00:10:38.840 --> 00:10:42.880
    I think that's a very important point, right? And, and we're firm believers on,

    187
    00:10:42.940 --> 00:10:47.440
    on, on transparency. And if you're using alternatives correctly,

    188
    00:10:47.540 --> 00:10:49.000
    if I'm understanding what you're saying,

    189
    00:10:49.260 --> 00:10:52.240
    and it is a diversification play to ensure that you're getting that

    190
    00:10:52.240 --> 00:10:55.960
    diversification, you need that level of transparency. And a lot of times, and,

    191
    00:10:55.960 --> 00:10:58.400
    and we've read about this and talked about this in the past,

    192
    00:10:58.470 --> 00:11:02.200
    sometimes these more opaque type strategies, you know,

    193
    00:11:02.200 --> 00:11:03.840
    if equities are doing really, really well,

    194
    00:11:04.070 --> 00:11:07.920
    they might be very correlated to equities at that very given point in time.

    195
    00:11:07.920 --> 00:11:12.400
    And then the whole story of diversification kind of goes out the window,

    196
    00:11:12.400 --> 00:11:13.233
    doesn't it?

    197
    00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:14.073
    A hundred percent.

    198
    00:11:14.260 --> 00:11:19.200
    And I think financial media hasn't helped in that education, right?

    199
    00:11:19.500 --> 00:11:23.920
    So there's been stretches of time when equity markets were doing very well,

    200
    00:11:24.100 --> 00:11:27.800
    and hedge funds haven't been, and, and you know, the storyline there is,

    201
    00:11:27.800 --> 00:11:31.280
    you know, hedge funds failed. And well, if hedge fund,

    202
    00:11:31.500 --> 00:11:35.600
    if a real alternative strategy has zero beta to the equity market and the equity

    203
    00:11:35.600 --> 00:11:36.920
    equity market's doing well,

    204
    00:11:37.720 --> 00:11:42.280
    I wouldn't necessarily expect to see those hedge funds up just because,

    205
    00:11:42.450 --> 00:11:43.640
    Right? If, if the,

    206
    00:11:43.780 --> 00:11:47.480
    if the alternative investment that you're using for diversification is zigging,

    207
    00:11:47.480 --> 00:11:49.240
    while your equities are zigging, you

    208
    00:11:49.240 --> 00:11:50.280
    Should ask questions. You should ask

    209
    00:11:50.440 --> 00:11:53.200
    Questions. Absolutely. Absolutely. Well, let,

    210
    00:11:53.200 --> 00:11:56.000
    let's talk a little bit about the performance, uh, of,

    211
    00:11:56.900 --> 00:11:59.720
    of alternative investing in relation to portfolio.

    212
    00:11:59.860 --> 00:12:03.120
    And you alluded to this in the beginning when, uh, you mentioned that, you know,

    213
    00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:07.880
    sometimes stocks and bonds do behave alike. Mm-hmm. And we saw that in 2022,

    214
    00:12:07.880 --> 00:12:11.840
    right? Yeah. Both had, uh, extremely volatile tough year,

    215
    00:12:12.350 --> 00:12:15.200
    both ended up in, in the red. Um,

    216
    00:12:16.380 --> 00:12:18.360
    how did alternatives do, or what,

    217
    00:12:18.360 --> 00:12:21.360
    how did alternative asset classes perform during that timeframe?

    218
    00:12:21.860 --> 00:12:25.680
    Uh, certain of them did reasonably well. So, uh, I'll,

    219
    00:12:25.680 --> 00:12:28.480
    I'll maybe run through a few examples of, uh,

    220
    00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:31.900
    strategies that are alternative. Uh,

    221
    00:12:31.900 --> 00:12:35.060
    our diversified alternative investment approach would include.

    222
    00:12:35.280 --> 00:12:39.420
    One of those is something called, uh, manage futures or trend following, or,

    223
    00:12:39.880 --> 00:12:43.500
    you know, if you want to think about, you know, quantitative factor investing,

    224
    00:12:43.500 --> 00:12:48.020
    which you know, is what we think about a lot, you can, you can consider that,

    225
    00:12:48.640 --> 00:12:51.660
    um, longitudinal momentum or momentum over time.

    226
    00:12:51.920 --> 00:12:56.900
    And this is really just a strategy that takes advantage of investing in futures

    227
    00:12:56.900 --> 00:13:00.660
    and forwards. So derivatives that'll cover, you know, commodities,

    228
    00:13:00.760 --> 00:13:05.460
    equity markets, fixed income markets. Uh, and in the simplest sense,

    229
    00:13:06.200 --> 00:13:10.100
    if a trend in an asset class is up,

    230
    00:13:10.590 --> 00:13:14.900
    especially over, you know, short, medium, and long-term time periods,

    231
    00:13:15.080 --> 00:13:18.580
    the managed future strategy would essentially be long that exposure.

    232
    00:13:19.440 --> 00:13:22.380
    And if a trend is down over, you know,

    233
    00:13:22.670 --> 00:13:27.500
    short and long horizon managed future strategy would be short, uh,

    234
    00:13:27.500 --> 00:13:30.780
    that asset class or commodity. So in 2022,

    235
    00:13:31.530 --> 00:13:35.100
    when everything felt like it was going down and continuing down,

    236
    00:13:35.720 --> 00:13:39.820
    the managed future strategy was able to reposition and be short,

    237
    00:13:40.290 --> 00:13:45.220
    many of those strategies that were showing persistent negative price signals.

    238
    00:13:45.840 --> 00:13:49.580
    So in 2022 a year when both equity and fixed income markets globally,

    239
    00:13:50.090 --> 00:13:51.900
    generally speaking on a diversified basis,

    240
    00:13:52.010 --> 00:13:54.420
    were down and very positively correlated,

    241
    00:13:54.730 --> 00:13:59.460
    something like a managed future strategy was up, uh, strongly and,

    242
    00:13:59.460 --> 00:14:01.260
    and very diversifying. That's

    243
    00:14:01.260 --> 00:14:01.740
    Really interesting.

    244
    00:14:01.740 --> 00:14:06.740
    And so would you'd have the same expectation if both stocks and bonds were

    245
    00:14:06.740 --> 00:14:09.580
    up, that the mayor's future strategy might be down, or does it depend?

    246
    00:14:10.160 --> 00:14:10.993
    It depends.

    247
    00:14:11.080 --> 00:14:14.900
    So it depends on the strength of those signals and the persistence of those

    248
    00:14:14.900 --> 00:14:19.100
    trends. So in, in certain stable, neutral, slow,

    249
    00:14:20.090 --> 00:14:24.900
    generally up markets, those signals may be too choppy to, to make use of.

    250
    00:14:25.160 --> 00:14:28.940
    And maybe if there's conflicting signals, say, you know,

    251
    00:14:29.560 --> 00:14:32.900
    up in the short term, down strongly in the medium term,

    252
    00:14:33.000 --> 00:14:35.460
    up slightly in the long term, you know,

    253
    00:14:35.460 --> 00:14:38.020
    you can't always make sense of those quantitative signals and,

    254
    00:14:38.020 --> 00:14:42.260
    and you might have no exposure in that type of underlying market or commodity or

    255
    00:14:42.260 --> 00:14:43.000
    asset class.

    256
    00:14:43.000 --> 00:14:46.540
    So that'll conclude part one of our, uh, conversation alternative investments.

    257
    00:14:46.610 --> 00:14:49.300
    Phil, thanks for joining us. And for our listeners, uh,

    258
    00:14:49.300 --> 00:14:50.900
    if you're looking for additional information,

    259
    00:14:51.160 --> 00:14:54.920
    please feel free to visit our website, www.symmetrypartners.com,

    260
    00:14:55.260 --> 00:14:58.400
    and to access more of the Unfiltered Finance podcasts.

    261
    00:14:58.580 --> 00:15:01.800
    Please feel free to find us wherever you're getting your podcast today.

    262
    00:15:02.020 --> 00:15:03.480
    Be sure to stay tuned for part two.

    263
    00:15:03.840 --> 00:15:08.320
    Symmetry Partners LLC is an investment advisor firm registered with the

    264
    00:15:08.320 --> 00:15:10.080
    Securities and Exchange Commission.

    265
    00:15:10.420 --> 00:15:15.120
    The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered or

    266
    00:15:15.560 --> 00:15:18.600
    excluded or exempted from registration requirements.

    267
    00:15:19.040 --> 00:15:23.680
    Registration of an investment advisor does not imply any specific level of skill

    268
    00:15:23.700 --> 00:15:24.533
    or training,

    269
    00:15:24.660 --> 00:15:28.520
    and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the commission.

    270
    00:15:28.860 --> 00:15:32.000
    No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment,

    271
    00:15:32.210 --> 00:15:34.480
    investment strategy, product,

    272
    00:15:34.980 --> 00:15:39.240
    or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in

    273
    00:15:39.240 --> 00:15:43.690
    this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy,

    274
    00:15:43.940 --> 00:15:48.890
    there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss due to various

    275
    00:15:48.890 --> 00:15:53.370
    factors including changing market conditions and or applicable laws.

    276
    00:15:54.070 --> 00:15:58.450
    The content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.

    277
    00:15:58.790 --> 00:16:02.890
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only.

    278
    00:16:02.970 --> 00:16:03.670
    Moreover,

    279
    00:16:03.670 --> 00:16:07.810
    you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this

    280
    00:16:08.010 --> 00:16:12.050
    material serves as the receipt of or as a substitute for

    281
    00:16:12.370 --> 00:16:14.490
    personalized investment advice.

  • Stories of historically atypical interest rate hikes, and multiple bank failures, concerned many advisors in the early days of 2023. Join us for the second (and final) part of our discussion with Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Consultant, and the host of Unfiltered Finance, Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships, as we discuss some of the more prominent news events, and their effects, during Q1 of this year.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    Transcript:

    0
    00:00:01.900 --> 00:00:07.800
    Let's let's

    1
    00:00:07.600 --> 00:00:10.600
    shift a little bit to some of the headlines that we saw because there was

    2
    00:00:10.600 --> 00:00:15.100
    there's quite a bit. It felt like it was a very long quarter. Yeah, and you

    3
    00:00:14.200 --> 00:00:17.700
    know as we did see some positive results, but can we

    4
    00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:21.300
    talk a little bit about just in general some of the headlines that we saw and

    5
    00:00:20.600 --> 00:00:25.000
    then specifically I want to take a dive into inflation

    6
    00:00:23.600 --> 00:00:26.700
    and then the banks because that was

    7
    00:00:26.700 --> 00:00:30.200
    a really big headline. We got a lot of a lot of calls regarding that look

    8
    00:00:29.800 --> 00:00:31.200
    there there were

    9
    00:00:33.300 --> 00:00:35.900
    Striking headlines around things like

    10
    00:00:36.800 --> 00:00:40.800
    shocks to sort of economic surprises on

    11
    00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:45.300
    job numbers to what was going on with the FED

    12
    00:00:45.100 --> 00:00:48.400
    to Banks not just near the United States but

    13
    00:00:48.100 --> 00:00:51.600
    internationally and yet what you see is kind

    14
    00:00:51.400 --> 00:00:55.000
    of, you know markets do what they do in in any given day. They respond

    15
    00:00:54.600 --> 00:00:57.900
    to that but they are quick to incorporate the news

    16
    00:00:57.600 --> 00:01:01.300
    and get back to pricing on other kinds of things. And

    17
    00:01:00.600 --> 00:01:05.200
    so I would say as a micro dosage of

    18
    00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:08.400
    what the ride is for investors. It's

    19
    00:01:07.800 --> 00:01:11.000
    this it's if you can sort of

    20
    00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:14.400
    take in stride that there are going to be lots of headlines and

    21
    00:01:14.100 --> 00:01:17.500
    that there may be short-term Market reactions headlines over the

    22
    00:01:17.400 --> 00:01:21.000
    longer term that kind of gets filtered out on

    23
    00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:23.700
    the upside and downside right and what you get back

    24
    00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:26.600
    to is. Hey one of my paying for right I'm paying for some kind

    25
    00:01:26.500 --> 00:01:30.100
    of future earnings or I'm lending with some expectation that

    26
    00:01:29.800 --> 00:01:33.800
    I'm going to get paid and income stream based on that and that tends

    27
    00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:36.700
    to drown out the short term noise and now

    28
    00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:40.200
    you're back to factors of how much did I pay did I

    29
    00:01:40.100 --> 00:01:41.700
    get my earnings did I not is

    30
    00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:45.600
    We're upside to that right and markets are kind of a weighing machine

    31
    00:01:45.500 --> 00:01:48.900
    in that sense. Right? They're weighing those earnings. They're weighing those

    32
    00:01:48.900 --> 00:01:52.200
    cash flows in the future. Right? So I would say

    33
    00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:55.900
    lots of lots of news lots of scurrying

    34
    00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:56.300
    around the news.

    35
    00:01:57.100 --> 00:02:01.000
    You know at the end of the day we're sort of where we started one

    36
    00:02:00.100 --> 00:02:03.200
    of the headlines and one of the things that we've been getting a lot

    37
    00:02:03.200 --> 00:02:06.300
    of questions about I'm talking about is is inflation. I know we've spent some time

    38
    00:02:06.200 --> 00:02:09.600
    already today talking about that. We did

    39
    00:02:09.400 --> 00:02:13.500
    see US inflation ease a little bit but there

    40
    00:02:13.100 --> 00:02:16.300
    might be some pressures coming up. So if you don't mind commenting on that, that

    41
    00:02:16.100 --> 00:02:19.200
    would be great. Yeah, you bet. I think it's helpful to kind of

    42
    00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:21.200
    take a step back and look at

    43
    00:02:22.200 --> 00:02:25.700
    With the onset of the pandemic right everything kind

    44
    00:02:25.400 --> 00:02:28.800
    of shut down and then when we went to reopen things back up

    45
    00:02:28.600 --> 00:02:32.000
    factories didn't necessarily open up, especially in

    46
    00:02:31.900 --> 00:02:36.600
    places like China right for some time. Right and the the

    47
    00:02:35.300 --> 00:02:39.700
    supply chain was suddenly

    48
    00:02:38.300 --> 00:02:41.500
    constrained and so we

    49
    00:02:41.300 --> 00:02:44.300
    had a hard time getting Goods, right but there was a lot

    50
    00:02:44.300 --> 00:02:48.400
    of demand because we were at home, you know person stuff and so

    51
    00:02:48.200 --> 00:02:51.700
    as you have demand shoot up but supplies constrained

    52
    00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:54.500
    price shoots up, right? That's just sort of Economics 101

    53
    00:02:54.200 --> 00:02:57.400
    and we saw that and at the time, you know, the Fed was quick

    54
    00:02:57.200 --> 00:03:00.500
    to say, hey, look we think this is transitory think eventually things

    55
    00:03:00.200 --> 00:03:03.700
    settle down we get manufacturing back online. We work

    56
    00:03:03.400 --> 00:03:06.700
    out the bugaboos associated with the supply chain

    57
    00:03:06.500 --> 00:03:09.600
    and those the price pressure doesn't inflationary pressure should come back

    58
    00:03:09.500 --> 00:03:13.100
    down over time and in large respect

    59
    00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:16.500
    this seems to have proven that out right?

    60
    00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:19.100
    I think what really got the fed's

    61
    00:03:18.800 --> 00:03:21.800
    attention and started them down the path.

    62
    00:03:22.200 --> 00:03:26.100
    Of really dramatically raising rates was

    63
    00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:28.700
    the fact that well while goods were

    64
    00:03:28.500 --> 00:03:31.800
    sort of starting to come back down. It was

    65
    00:03:31.600 --> 00:03:34.900
    inflation associated with services that was going up. And

    66
    00:03:34.600 --> 00:03:37.800
    in fact, what we've seen is good coming down

    67
    00:03:37.600 --> 00:03:40.700
    the the overall inflation of

    68
    00:03:40.600 --> 00:03:44.500
    the CPI number or that PC number coming down from its

    69
    00:03:44.100 --> 00:03:48.100
    highs last summer, but while that's been happening underneath

    70
    00:03:48.900 --> 00:03:52.300
    Inflation associated with Services has continued to

    71
    00:03:52.100 --> 00:03:52.600
    go up.

    72
    00:03:53.200 --> 00:03:56.500
    And so even if we're at a point now where the latest inflationary readings

    73
    00:03:56.200 --> 00:03:58.100
    are half of what they were.

    74
    00:03:58.900 --> 00:04:00.400
    Just a year ago this time.

    75
    00:04:01.600 --> 00:04:05.500
    Services inflation is up and continuing to go the wrong direction. Right? And

    76
    00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:08.400
    so the the FED has said hey, look

    77
    00:04:08.200 --> 00:04:11.400
    first of all, we don't look at kind of the overall CPI number. We don't

    78
    00:04:11.300 --> 00:04:15.500
    that's not how we measure it. We're looking at these underlying statuents and

    79
    00:04:14.900 --> 00:04:18.600
    they prefer the the pce as

    80
    00:04:18.200 --> 00:04:21.300
    opposed to CPI, but they're all just kind of ways of measuring, you know

    81
    00:04:21.300 --> 00:04:24.900
    inflation in the economy. And so

    82
    00:04:24.400 --> 00:04:27.400
    one of the ways that we've looked at

    83
    00:04:27.400 --> 00:04:30.600
    this for a very long time is core CPI, right? We're stripping out the

    84
    00:04:30.400 --> 00:04:34.100
    volatility of energy and food because those tend to move around so much and then

    85
    00:04:33.900 --> 00:04:37.300
    you know, we've been introduced to this concept that not

    86
    00:04:37.000 --> 00:04:40.500
    only is it core CPI, but it's core Goods CPI and

    87
    00:04:40.200 --> 00:04:44.100
    course Services CPI. And so the FED now is very focused

    88
    00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:48.000
    on core Services looking at Services minus

    89
    00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:50.400
    services for energy and food and what

    90
    00:04:50.100 --> 00:04:54.000
    we see are again our sort of troubling Trends

    91
    00:04:53.100 --> 00:04:56.500
    around services and housing

    92
    00:04:56.100 --> 00:04:59.400
    in terms of the impact that that

    93
    00:04:59.200 --> 00:05:01.400
    has now pushing.

    94
    00:05:01.600 --> 00:05:04.700
    Up or holding up those inflation numbers and if they

    95
    00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:08.100
    continue on the wrong direction, that's what the fed's concern about and the

    96
    00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:11.500
    the whammy that potentially comes

    97
    00:05:10.600 --> 00:05:13.900
    from if Services costs go

    98
    00:05:13.700 --> 00:05:16.800
    up at some point that starts to impact Goods costs as

    99
    00:05:16.700 --> 00:05:20.600
    well. Right? And so if you look at this where the the white

    100
    00:05:19.800 --> 00:05:23.200
    bars are coming down, right the the concern

    101
    00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:26.400
    is that Services cost the cost of producing goods

    102
    00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:29.200
    and delivering them right is going to impact the the cost

    103
    00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:32.500
    that gets passed through and goods start to come back up and there's sort

    104
    00:05:32.100 --> 00:05:35.500
    of a double double impact of inflation if

    105
    00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:38.700
    you will and that's what I think the FED is incredibly concerned about

    106
    00:05:38.500 --> 00:05:41.600
    and and why they say look we're gonna ratchet rates up

    107
    00:05:41.600 --> 00:05:45.700
    and we're gonna keep them up there long enough until we're convinced that we've we've

    108
    00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:48.000
    stamped this out and brought it back down to a level that's

    109
    00:05:47.800 --> 00:05:51.000
    livable because the last thing you want to do is take your foot off the pedal.

    110
    00:05:51.800 --> 00:05:55.300
    And then suddenly have a Resurgence of these

    111
    00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:58.300
    inflation Air Forces which that we've saw

    112
    00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:01.400
    in the 70s, right if you think about what we've we've

    113
    00:06:01.200 --> 00:06:04.800
    seen this show before the early 70s the FED raising

    114
    00:06:04.500 --> 00:06:08.400
    rates taking their their foot off the brake, I guess and then

    115
    00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:11.900
    Resurgence of inflation in the late 70s stagflationary

    116
    00:06:11.200 --> 00:06:14.500
    environment and it took the volcker FED in the 80s

    117
    00:06:14.200 --> 00:06:17.800
    taken rates to places. We'd never seen until recently right to

    118
    00:06:17.400 --> 00:06:20.700
    to stamp that out. And so I think the FED

    119
    00:06:20.500 --> 00:06:24.000
    is taking a lesson from history and said we don't want to repeat those mistakes.

    120
    00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:27.000
    We're gonna stay on this until we're sure right absolutely and

    121
    00:06:26.600 --> 00:06:30.200
    speaking of the fed and it says been a very fast pace

    122
    00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:32.800
    in terms of Ray hikes. Yeah

    123
    00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:36.200
    historically exactly exactly so

    124
    00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:40.400
    they they have meant business and I

    125
    00:06:39.500 --> 00:06:44.100
    think Market participants repeatedly made

    126
    00:06:43.200 --> 00:06:47.000
    the mistake of not taking

    127
    00:06:46.700 --> 00:06:48.200
    the FED at its word.

    128
    00:06:48.700 --> 00:06:51.900
    Right and and equities markets have

    129
    00:06:51.700 --> 00:06:54.900
    definitely gotten well ahead of the FED particularly at

    130
    00:06:54.700 --> 00:06:58.600
    the end of last year and maybe potentially the beginning of this year bond markets

    131
    00:06:58.200 --> 00:07:01.500
    now are pricing that the FED

    132
    00:07:01.200 --> 00:07:05.000
    will pull back and yet the FED is saying no. No, we're we're

    133
    00:07:04.600 --> 00:07:08.600
    gonna raise rates and we're gonna keep them there longer and that's

    134
    00:07:07.600 --> 00:07:10.900
    you know, we have no expectation that we would

    135
    00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:14.300
    pull back from that anytime this year. Right? So the market

    136
    00:07:13.800 --> 00:07:17.000
    participants are our forward looking forward pricing, but

    137
    00:07:16.900 --> 00:07:20.500
    they seem to not be taking the FED at its word. I think that's pulled

    138
    00:07:20.100 --> 00:07:23.800
    back a little bit in February and March we started to

    139
    00:07:23.500 --> 00:07:25.400
    see Market participants kind of get their arms around.

    140
    00:07:26.300 --> 00:07:29.400
    Actually be coming and we see you know

    141
    00:07:29.400 --> 00:07:33.400
    investors like hedge funds really sort of looking at volatility

    142
    00:07:32.400 --> 00:07:36.000
    Bets with the expectation that hey this

    143
    00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:39.300
    may get a little more turbulent before it gets better. Right? So

    144
    00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:44.200
    there's a lot of sort of now Market positioning

    145
    00:07:43.200 --> 00:07:46.500
    for the fed me

    146
    00:07:46.300 --> 00:07:49.800
    actually do this and we may see an economic pullback,

    147
    00:07:49.300 --> 00:07:52.800
    but that may not necessarily mean the FED response to

    148
    00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:56.500
    it. Right? I think again as we look forward the

    149
    00:07:55.900 --> 00:08:00.100
    the way that I would think about this as an investor as a the

    150
    00:07:59.200 --> 00:08:03.000
    stock market is not the economy, right? The

    151
    00:08:02.400 --> 00:08:06.200
    markets are definitely driven by

    152
    00:08:05.700 --> 00:08:09.400
    interest rates and fed movement

    153
    00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:10.200
    and yet

    154
    00:08:12.500 --> 00:08:16.400
    Much like headlines the markets take that

    155
    00:08:16.200 --> 00:08:20.200
    news and stride it gets built into prices and there

    156
    00:08:19.800 --> 00:08:23.000
    may be short-term volatility associated with this but if you look out over

    157
    00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:26.300
    time, you know, what what do we see going back to

    158
    00:08:26.000 --> 00:08:29.200
    you know, as long as we have records 1926 and Beyond

    159
    00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:32.600
    right Imperial heads when interest rates

    160
    00:08:32.300 --> 00:08:36.300
    go up interest rates go down inflationary environments disinflationary environments

    161
    00:08:35.900 --> 00:08:40.100
    recessionary environments across all of those things markets

    162
    00:08:38.900 --> 00:08:42.400
    tend to produce a return

    163
    00:08:42.100 --> 00:08:45.700
    of you know, seven to ten percent average annual

    164
    00:08:45.400 --> 00:08:49.000
    you don't get that every year but you get on average over time and it's

    165
    00:08:48.700 --> 00:08:52.200
    paying you for those cash flows so much like,

    166
    00:08:51.900 --> 00:08:55.100
    you know, the all the comments that we've had prior to

    167
    00:08:54.900 --> 00:08:55.200
    this.

    168
    00:08:56.500 --> 00:08:59.900
    As investors, it's important to sort of take in its Stride

    169
    00:08:59.800 --> 00:09:02.900
    Right put some blinders on there may be volatility associated with

    170
    00:09:02.800 --> 00:09:06.400
    this ride. You will get wet on this ride. Right but we

    171
    00:09:05.800 --> 00:09:08.900
    promise you'll come out in the other side, right and when you do,

    172
    00:09:08.800 --> 00:09:11.900
    you know, the markets will get back to doing what they

    173
    00:09:11.800 --> 00:09:15.000
    do, which is you know, paying you for putting Capital to work

    174
    00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:18.400
    in there. So so that I would say again we watch these

    175
    00:09:18.100 --> 00:09:21.300
    things. We we sort of especially working

    176
    00:09:21.100 --> 00:09:24.200
    in the industry. It's a incumbent upon

    177
    00:09:24.100 --> 00:09:27.200
    us to have some product prognostication about where this could

    178
    00:09:27.100 --> 00:09:30.800
    be headed at the end of the day what we think matters very little it's

    179
    00:09:30.100 --> 00:09:33.300
    what actually happens and we build portfolios to

    180
    00:09:33.100 --> 00:09:36.600
    be as robust as we can because Anything Could Happen. Yeah, that's that's fantastic.

    181
    00:09:36.100 --> 00:09:39.300
    And that's a really good way of putting it. We don't know what's

    182
    00:09:39.100 --> 00:09:40.000
    happening, but we're

    183
    00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:45.000
    We're invested in a way to endure what's to come? Right? Exactly. So

    184
    00:09:44.100 --> 00:09:47.500
    one of the headlines that we we spent

    185
    00:09:47.300 --> 00:09:50.700
    a lot of time talking to advisors and investors alike is the

    186
    00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:54.200
    the notion of the banks and we saw from Silicon Valley

    187
    00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:56.100
    and First Republic and a few others.

    188
    00:09:57.000 --> 00:10:00.200
    I think it's a it's a risk reward story. But I also think

    189
    00:10:00.000 --> 00:10:04.400
    this is the diversification story there. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Yeah. Well, yes,

    190
    00:10:03.700 --> 00:10:05.500
    I think

    191
    00:10:06.600 --> 00:10:08.300
    the the situation with the banks

    192
    00:10:09.300 --> 00:10:13.300
    has a lot to do with other stuff, right? Yes, the

    193
    00:10:12.600 --> 00:10:15.800
    the banks were quick to come out and say well this

    194
    00:10:15.600 --> 00:10:18.800
    is a consequence of how rapidly the FED is

    195
    00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:22.300
    raised interest rates. And this is potentially impaired the

    196
    00:10:22.200 --> 00:10:25.300
    asset base of these Banks and there's no question right over the

    197
    00:10:25.200 --> 00:10:28.600
    course of 2022. You saw the asset base

    198
    00:10:28.200 --> 00:10:31.500
    drop significantly across banks in

    199
    00:10:31.400 --> 00:10:34.800
    general because right so, you know first principles,

    200
    00:10:34.400 --> 00:10:37.500
    what is a bank do they take money in when they

    201
    00:10:37.500 --> 00:10:41.100
    take that money in as a deposit? It's a liability to them. Right?

    202
    00:10:40.500 --> 00:10:43.600
    So they take that liability and they got to go match it up

    203
    00:10:43.500 --> 00:10:47.000
    with an asset and they do that either by making loans and if

    204
    00:10:46.900 --> 00:10:50.800
    they can't make enough loans, then they got to go buy bonds treasuries.

    205
    00:10:50.300 --> 00:10:53.800
    For instance, right? Yes. That's the old against the

    206
    00:10:53.300 --> 00:10:56.600
    liabilities. So if you if you've got a bank that

    207
    00:10:56.300 --> 00:10:59.600
    has a bunch of bonds that they're holding as an asset

    208
    00:10:59.300 --> 00:11:03.000
    and the value of those bonds dramatically drop. They've lost

    209
    00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:06.000
    a lot of money against the liabilities that

    210
    00:11:05.900 --> 00:11:08.800
    are still where they are, right and

    211
    00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:13.400
    So that's that's the the challenge for

    212
    00:11:12.900 --> 00:11:13.900
    the financial.

    213
    00:11:15.800 --> 00:11:19.200
    sector and it no surprise the financial sector

    214
    00:11:18.900 --> 00:11:22.600
    was sort of the worst performing sector for the first quarter in large

    215
    00:11:22.400 --> 00:11:23.700
    part because of these Dynamics

    216
    00:11:24.800 --> 00:11:28.300
    It was a part of what happened at svb. It was a catalyst

    217
    00:11:27.800 --> 00:11:31.300
    for the bank run that followed but the bank

    218
    00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:34.500
    run followed because of the unique dynamics of

    219
    00:11:34.400 --> 00:11:38.100
    svb, correct? Right and the the failure

    220
    00:11:37.500 --> 00:11:40.900
    of silvergate was

    221
    00:11:40.500 --> 00:11:44.200
    function of crypto and had as

    222
    00:11:43.800 --> 00:11:47.500
    much to do with FTX the failure of FTX, which

    223
    00:11:47.200 --> 00:11:50.300
    was a Ponzi scheme, right? So you have

    224
    00:11:50.200 --> 00:11:54.300
    a lot of kind of very unique situations Signature Bank,

    225
    00:11:54.100 --> 00:11:58.000
    very crypto focused right First Republic the

    226
    00:11:57.100 --> 00:12:00.900
    very very heavily on

    227
    00:12:00.200 --> 00:12:04.200
    the asset side writing interest only mortgages

    228
    00:12:03.400 --> 00:12:06.700
    right in to a degree that other

    229
    00:12:06.500 --> 00:12:10.500
    Banks didn't have some unique characteristics of these Banks which cause

    230
    00:12:09.900 --> 00:12:13.600
    them to be sort of the canary in the coal mine if you will right

    231
    00:12:12.900 --> 00:12:16.100
    and Credit Suisse just

    232
    00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:21.100
    Has struggled for years, right? And this was

    233
    00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:24.500
    just the nail in the coffin form. The concern is are they

    234
    00:12:24.200 --> 00:12:27.600
    the canary in the coal mine or are they just being punished because

    235
    00:12:27.400 --> 00:12:29.900
    the malfeasance and poor management?

    236
    00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:34.700
    And I think the answer is a bit of both, right? So the the

    237
    00:12:34.400 --> 00:12:38.400
    fed and other institutions got

    238
    00:12:38.000 --> 00:12:41.900
    together and said, hey, we got a backstop this thing to keep any contagion

    239
    00:12:41.300 --> 00:12:45.300
    from spreading and assure depositors that

    240
    00:12:45.200 --> 00:12:48.600
    they're deposits are safe, even if the value of the bond the assets

    241
    00:12:48.200 --> 00:12:51.600
    that these banks are holding have dropped down. We the the government

    242
    00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:54.300
    are going to step in and and backstop not just

    243
    00:12:54.200 --> 00:12:57.300
    your 250,000 but everything right that was

    244
    00:12:57.300 --> 00:13:00.500
    the strong message that they sent and that sort of seem to

    245
    00:13:00.300 --> 00:13:03.600
    work, right it calm markets. Thanks for still being sort of reviewed and

    246
    00:13:03.500 --> 00:13:06.500
    I would say look there's there could be more to this story. There could be

    247
    00:13:06.500 --> 00:13:09.800
    other shoes to drop in time. Right? So you'll continue

    248
    00:13:09.500 --> 00:13:12.600
    to watch it. I think as in as a person

    249
    00:13:12.500 --> 00:13:15.600
    who has money at a bank, right am I rushing to pull my money

    250
    00:13:15.500 --> 00:13:18.800
    out? No, I'm fairly confident that you know,

    251
    00:13:18.800 --> 00:13:21.500
    we're we're gonna survive this right now.

    252
    00:13:22.400 --> 00:13:26.100
    Did I say the same thing in 2008 when when I

    253
    00:13:25.700 --> 00:13:28.900
    really thought hey, man, the whole financial system could go down.

    254
    00:13:28.800 --> 00:13:32.300
    These Banks had collapse in Mass. I don't think we're anywhere

    255
    00:13:31.900 --> 00:13:35.300
    near that I think banks are much healthier than than they

    256
    00:13:35.100 --> 00:13:39.900
    were then and I think the issues that they have have to do with treasuries and

    257
    00:13:39.800 --> 00:13:43.200
    the FED has said look, we're gonna step in and provide as much liquidity

    258
    00:13:42.800 --> 00:13:46.400
    as necessary for the banks. So this becomes

    259
    00:13:45.900 --> 00:13:49.700
    a potential issue down the down the pike, right? If

    260
    00:13:49.200 --> 00:13:52.700
    in fact the FED has to step in and provide the

    261
    00:13:52.300 --> 00:13:55.700
    Surplus liquidity to the treasury market,

    262
    00:13:55.500 --> 00:13:56.800
    why might they have to do that?

    263
    00:13:57.800 --> 00:14:01.000
    Well, if for some reason we default on the debt ceiling for instance,

    264
    00:14:00.800 --> 00:14:04.200
    right that could be very problematic and the FED

    265
    00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:07.200
    might have to take aggressive steps in a way that we've

    266
    00:14:07.100 --> 00:14:11.300
    never seen before to step in and try and provide Surplus liquidity

    267
    00:14:10.700 --> 00:14:14.000
    specifically to the treasury market. That would

    268
    00:14:13.800 --> 00:14:17.300
    be a complete roll reversal of where we've been right? That's that's

    269
    00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:20.900
    taking the quantitative tightening off the table and now we're back to quantities, right

    270
    00:14:20.400 --> 00:14:23.600
    so so could things come down the bike that

    271
    00:14:23.500 --> 00:14:26.900
    would cause a, you know, real dislocation to

    272
    00:14:26.500 --> 00:14:29.900
    banking to markets sure it could happen

    273
    00:14:29.700 --> 00:14:32.900
    again. Who knows right? Everybody's got a crystal

    274
    00:14:32.800 --> 00:14:33.100
    ball.

    275
    00:14:34.100 --> 00:14:37.700
    Nobody's usually right spot on about what's gonna happen, but

    276
    00:14:37.200 --> 00:14:40.400
    it's a potential risk that you want. Hey, look this might happen, but

    277
    00:14:40.300 --> 00:14:41.000
    we'll survive.

    278
    00:14:41.600 --> 00:14:45.200
    Yeah, no, absolutely. And as you said before, I mean, it seems like the markets

    279
    00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:45.300
    have.

    280
    00:14:46.100 --> 00:14:49.600
    sort of shrugged off those headlines because we've seen some pretty decent returns

    281
    00:14:49.100 --> 00:14:52.000
    and in q1, but I think you know in

    282
    00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:56.500
    Let's let's go back to the text docs, right? I mean that's what's really

    283
    00:14:56.300 --> 00:14:57.800
    leading the charge here, isn't it?

    284
    00:14:58.800 --> 00:14:59.000
    well

    285
    00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:01.800
    I think there are a lot of Dynamics at play.

    286
    00:15:02.400 --> 00:15:06.000
    But underpinning all of that is risk and reward right?

    287
    00:15:05.500 --> 00:15:08.800
    I mean that at the end of the day, it's that simple

    288
    00:15:08.600 --> 00:15:11.700
    what are the risks and what are the rewards and how much am I

    289
    00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:15.400
    willing to pay for those rewards? And am I underestimating those

    290
    00:15:15.200 --> 00:15:18.800
    risks? Right? So everything is sort of a function of those things

    291
    00:15:18.600 --> 00:15:22.000
    and so I would say look in equities. The the

    292
    00:15:21.600 --> 00:15:25.200
    tech stocks is a risk, right? There's there's certainly reward

    293
    00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:28.400
    there's upside there. We're seeing it in terms of markets, but I think there's risk

    294
    00:15:28.100 --> 00:15:31.800
    right in fixed income. There's potential

    295
    00:15:31.200 --> 00:15:34.600
    risk associated with the yield curve

    296
    00:15:34.400 --> 00:15:39.000
    and what happens with the fed and raising rates in areas,

    297
    00:15:38.100 --> 00:15:41.600
    like financials. There's risks

    298
    00:15:41.200 --> 00:15:44.800
    right associated with that. I think the key

    299
    00:15:44.500 --> 00:15:47.800
    takeaway for that for anybody looking at

    300
    00:15:47.600 --> 00:15:48.300
    it is

    301
    00:15:49.200 --> 00:15:52.500
    Broad diversification not just in

    302
    00:15:52.200 --> 00:15:55.600
    one geography not just inequities not just in fixed income

    303
    00:15:55.300 --> 00:15:58.300
    across factors as much as you

    304
    00:15:58.300 --> 00:16:01.800
    can broadly diversify the more robust your portfolio is to

    305
    00:16:01.300 --> 00:16:04.200
    stand up to any of those unique risks.

    306
    00:16:04.900 --> 00:16:06.800
    And so I would I would say.

    307
    00:16:08.200 --> 00:16:12.100
    That that would be where I would encourage investors to

    308
    00:16:11.700 --> 00:16:13.100
    sort of keep their heads.

    309
    00:16:14.100 --> 00:16:17.400
    I it's always challenging when you have tech stocks doing

    310
    00:16:17.300 --> 00:16:20.800
    as well as they are because they drive

    311
    00:16:20.400 --> 00:16:23.700
    markets you want to be there. You want to participate in it.

    312
    00:16:23.500 --> 00:16:27.400
    There's a a benefit socially to

    313
    00:16:26.700 --> 00:16:30.100
    holding names that people are familiar

    314
    00:16:29.700 --> 00:16:33.000
    with and talk about right if you think about the

    315
    00:16:32.700 --> 00:16:36.000
    fomo experience that people have

    316
    00:16:35.700 --> 00:16:38.900
    missing if you're missing out, right? Yeah, my next

    317
    00:16:38.900 --> 00:16:41.900
    door neighbor. He's he's got Google and apple and they're tear on

    318
    00:16:41.900 --> 00:16:45.800
    the cover off the ball. Never mind. What happened last year right now, I gotta you

    319
    00:16:45.100 --> 00:16:48.500
    know, keep up with the Joneses on that water cooler. Alpha

    320
    00:16:48.100 --> 00:16:51.600
    is what I call that. Yeah water cooler Alpha and I would just

    321
    00:16:51.300 --> 00:16:54.900
    say hey look at the end of the day. We're people right if we

    322
    00:16:54.600 --> 00:16:57.800
    were autonomous, you know Vulcans. This would just be

    323
    00:16:57.700 --> 00:17:01.000
    economics and math and we can figure it all out reality is

    324
    00:17:00.900 --> 00:17:04.700
    we're people and you got to build a portfolio you can live with right as

    325
    00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:07.300
    our as our good friend Phil Henry says, you

    326
    00:17:07.200 --> 00:17:10.700
    got to build a portfolio you can live with and then live with it, right? I think

    327
    00:17:10.700 --> 00:17:13.400
    that's absolutely true. And so you have to take into account.

    328
    00:17:14.000 --> 00:17:17.700
    The the investor psychology associated with this that's

    329
    00:17:17.000 --> 00:17:20.200
    why I think momentum is such a

    330
    00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:23.500
    powerful factor to build into your portfolios

    331
    00:17:23.000 --> 00:17:26.200
    because momentum picks up

    332
    00:17:26.000 --> 00:17:29.400
    these like when tech stocks going to run you end up

    333
    00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:33.400
    owning things like Apple and Google and because they

    334
    00:17:32.900 --> 00:17:37.100
    are demonstrating positive momentum, right? So you you're picking

    335
    00:17:36.400 --> 00:17:39.800
    up some of that you're participating in that upside and I

    336
    00:17:39.800 --> 00:17:42.900
    think as a as an investor, that's that would probably be enough for

    337
    00:17:42.800 --> 00:17:46.400
    me, right? It's a modicum of the things that I everybody else

    338
    00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:49.400
    is holding that that's working but it's also stuff that's not working

    339
    00:17:49.300 --> 00:17:52.400
    because eventually that circles around and that becomes the thing

    340
    00:17:52.300 --> 00:17:55.600
    that's worth. I don't have to try and time it. I'm just holding it and I'm

    341
    00:17:55.400 --> 00:17:58.600
    waiting keeping my powder dry in that area so that when it

    342
    00:17:58.400 --> 00:18:02.100
    does I benefit that that's how I would think about it look again

    343
    00:18:01.700 --> 00:18:03.100
    tech stocks are

    344
    00:18:04.300 --> 00:18:08.300
    The amazing thing about markets is they run longer than you think they should right. They're

    345
    00:18:07.900 --> 00:18:12.100
    fueled by stuff. Sometimes you don't understand and and

    346
    00:18:11.600 --> 00:18:15.100
    in many cases, I think the

    347
    00:18:14.700 --> 00:18:18.500
    tech stock Dynamic is is part

    348
    00:18:17.800 --> 00:18:21.300
    fairy dust, right and you know,

    349
    00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:24.500
    we watched it run for a decade and drive markets, you know

    350
    00:18:24.500 --> 00:18:28.800
    for you know, double digit returns for years because

    351
    00:18:27.800 --> 00:18:31.900
    that happen again, of course, it could right. I'm not

    352
    00:18:31.900 --> 00:18:35.700
    gonna tell you again. I am cautious about the

    353
    00:18:35.200 --> 00:18:38.600
    dynamic being set up looking very similar to

    354
    00:18:38.500 --> 00:18:42.200
    the dynamic that we saw at you know, 2019 2020.

    355
    00:18:41.700 --> 00:18:45.000
    Yeah. No, absolutely and you know that seems like that tech

    356
    00:18:44.700 --> 00:18:47.900
    store keeps popping up. I started my career in the late 90s and that was the

    357
    00:18:47.800 --> 00:18:50.600
    whole story and then I saw a lot of portfolios.

    358
    00:18:51.300 --> 00:18:55.100
    A lot of people see their portfolios blow up but because of overexposure to

    359
    00:18:55.000 --> 00:18:58.500
    to technology and they having a

    360
    00:18:58.400 --> 00:19:02.400
    balanced portfolio Diversified across multiple asset classes regions geographies.

    361
    00:19:01.900 --> 00:19:05.000
    That's that's the best course of action at the

    362
    00:19:04.900 --> 00:19:10.100
    end of the day. So yeah, I think I go back to the the E-Trade

    363
    00:19:09.300 --> 00:19:12.600
    baby, right if you remember the E-Trade baby so easy

    364
    00:19:12.500 --> 00:19:15.800
    baby. Yeah that was born right on the text actually and then

    365
    00:19:15.600 --> 00:19:18.700
    they they put the baby away for a while baby's back right now. I was

    366
    00:19:18.600 --> 00:19:21.800
    a little bit older now, he's out of the wedding, you know hanging out

    367
    00:19:21.700 --> 00:19:25.200
    with this guys and gals but to

    368
    00:19:24.800 --> 00:19:28.200
    me that a Hallmark of a caution, right because

    369
    00:19:27.900 --> 00:19:32.000
    the reality is it's it's easy but

    370
    00:19:31.600 --> 00:19:34.900
    hard right it's not you know, it's not

    371
    00:19:34.700 --> 00:19:38.500
    difficult to say. Hey look broadly based diversification sit still it's

    372
    00:19:37.700 --> 00:19:41.000
    incredibly difficult to do. Yeah, right and that's where

    373
    00:19:40.900 --> 00:19:45.100
    the real benefit of working with financial professionals comes in because everybody

    374
    00:19:44.300 --> 00:19:47.900
    thinks they can do it everybody. They're gonna be Spock

    375
    00:19:47.300 --> 00:19:50.600
    and devoid of emotion, but then the moment of truth comes

    376
    00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:54.200
    The market drops 40% and you're looking at like am I gonna

    377
    00:19:54.200 --> 00:19:57.400
    be able to retire? Right and the fear grips hold and it's

    378
    00:19:57.200 --> 00:20:00.900
    2 am and you're thinking what do I do? Right. That's

    379
    00:20:00.300 --> 00:20:03.400
    when you need to have that dispassionate third party

    380
    00:20:03.300 --> 00:20:07.700
    to pick up the phone and say I want to sell everything. They whoa. Let's

    381
    00:20:07.100 --> 00:20:11.000
    revisit right like is anything changed? Oh the

    382
    00:20:10.400 --> 00:20:13.700
    market drop 40% right has anything in your life changed right?

    383
    00:20:13.400 --> 00:20:16.800
    Maybe that's not the best course of action. Let's take a beat having that

    384
    00:20:16.600 --> 00:20:20.000
    dispassionate a third party to keep you from blowing yourself up

    385
    00:20:19.700 --> 00:20:23.000
    at that exact moment is invaluable. Yeah

    386
    00:20:22.700 --> 00:20:26.400
    and making sure you have the right mix between stocks bonds

    387
    00:20:26.000 --> 00:20:29.900
    and maybe even Alternatives depending on the investor and if someone

    388
    00:20:29.500 --> 00:20:33.000
    can't sleep at night, it's not necessarily that they should take action,

    389
    00:20:32.600 --> 00:20:35.800
    but they might be in the wrong asset allocation for

    390
    00:20:35.600 --> 00:20:36.200
    their

    391
    00:20:37.300 --> 00:20:41.000
    The risk, you know their ability to accept right? Yeah,

    392
    00:20:40.600 --> 00:20:45.800
    it could be that often. What I've

    393
    00:20:45.500 --> 00:20:48.800
    experienced is when it's that it's because the client wanted

    394
    00:20:48.500 --> 00:20:52.000
    more Tech right in their portfolios or more of what's

    395
    00:20:51.700 --> 00:20:55.100
    working, right? And then when that's no longer working, they

    396
    00:20:54.700 --> 00:20:57.700
    can't sleep at night, but cautionary Tale the other

    397
    00:20:57.700 --> 00:21:01.900
    piece of that is we're surrounded by the news 24/7

    398
    00:21:01.000 --> 00:21:04.600
    right? It's just and it's always the whatever

    399
    00:21:04.100 --> 00:21:07.700
    bleeds leads right? And so it's this constant

    400
    00:21:07.100 --> 00:21:12.200
    drum beat of kind of negative stuff. And I think that investors

    401
    00:21:10.400 --> 00:21:13.700
    need a voice.

    402
    00:21:14.600 --> 00:21:18.000
    That that they trust to say. Hey, yeah. No I

    403
    00:21:17.800 --> 00:21:21.600
    saw that too. Yes, that bank went out of business. Here's

    404
    00:21:20.800 --> 00:21:24.600
    why we shouldn't Panic here, right? Yep. We

    405
    00:21:24.500 --> 00:21:28.300
    see all that. Here's why we're gonna stay the course. Here's why we're not gonna Panic. Here's

    406
    00:21:27.800 --> 00:21:31.200
    what let's you know, our long-term goals are and we're in good

    407
    00:21:31.100 --> 00:21:35.000
    shape to hit those. I think that sort of calming reassurance

    408
    00:21:34.500 --> 00:21:37.700
    helps people get back to sleeping at night. Yeah. No,

    409
    00:21:37.500 --> 00:21:40.800
    I agree Casey as always. It's a pleasure talking to you.

    410
    00:21:40.700 --> 00:21:43.800
    Thanks for joining us great having you here and I want to thank all of

    411
    00:21:43.700 --> 00:21:47.400
    our listeners and these feel free to access other podcasts

    412
    00:21:46.800 --> 00:21:49.800
    that we have done and they can be

    413
    00:21:49.800 --> 00:21:53.300
    accessed anywhere you get your podcast. So thanks everyone and we

    414
    00:21:53.000 --> 00:21:56.800
    will see you next time symmetry Partners LLC.

    415
    00:21:56.100 --> 00:21:59.600
    It's an investment advisor firm register with

    416
    00:21:59.400 --> 00:22:03.300
    the Security and Exchange Commission The Firm only transacts

    417
    00:22:02.400 --> 00:22:06.200
    business in states where it is properly registered or

    418
    00:22:05.900 --> 00:22:09.800
    excluded or Exempted from registration requirements

    419
    00:22:09.000 --> 00:22:12.900
    registration of an investment advisor does

    420
    00:22:12.600 --> 00:22:14.000
    not imply any specific.

    421
    00:22:14.600 --> 00:22:18.100
    Of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement

    422
    00:22:17.700 --> 00:22:21.000
    of the firm by the commission. No one should assume

    423
    00:22:20.800 --> 00:22:24.800
    that future performance of any specific investment investment strategy

    424
    00:22:24.200 --> 00:22:28.100
    product or non-investment related content

    425
    00:22:27.600 --> 00:22:30.800
    made reference to directly or indirectly in this

    426
    00:22:30.600 --> 00:22:32.600
    material will be profitable.

    427
    00:22:33.500 --> 00:22:37.400
    As with any investment strategy there is the possibility of profitability

    428
    00:22:36.600 --> 00:22:39.800
    as well as loss due to

    429
    00:22:39.700 --> 00:22:43.800
    various factors including changing market conditions and/or

    430
    00:22:42.900 --> 00:22:44.800
    applicable laws.

    431
    00:22:45.500 --> 00:22:49.000
    Content may not be reflective of current opinions or

    432
    00:22:48.700 --> 00:22:52.200
    positions. Please note the material is

    433
    00:22:51.700 --> 00:22:55.300
    provided for educational and background use only moreover. You

    434
    00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:58.900
    should not assume that any discussion or information contained

    435
    00:22:58.200 --> 00:23:01.400
    in this material Services the receipt of

    436
    00:23:01.200 --> 00:23:05.200
    or as a substitute for personalized investment

    437
    00:23:04.600 --> 00:23:05.800
    advice.

  • The sudden failure of Silicon Valley Bank in March jostled investors' confidence in the market. But, the overall performance of various tech stocks in Q1, such as Tesla, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon, Salesforce, AMD, and Broadcom, served to revive optimism for the stock market's near future. Join Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Consultant, and our host Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships and Product Development, in this first half of of our Q1 recap, as we discuss both market, and factor performance, in the first few months of 2023.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    Transcript:

    0
    00:00:01.900 --> 00:00:07.400
    Good afternoon,

    1
    00:00:07.400 --> 00:00:10.700
    everyone. This is Tom Romano head of strategic relationships at

    2
    00:00:10.700 --> 00:00:14.200
    symmetry partners and joined with me. Today is Casey Dillon

    3
    00:00:13.200 --> 00:00:16.900
    a long time friend of symmetry and our

    4
    00:00:16.900 --> 00:00:19.500
    internal communication strategist. Thank you Casey for

    5
    00:00:19.500 --> 00:00:22.400
    joining us today. Tom is excellent to be here with you live in

    6
    00:00:22.400 --> 00:00:25.100
    person. Yeah, fantastic. Fantastic So today, we're gonna go

    7
    00:00:25.100 --> 00:00:28.900
    through our q1 2023 quarter in

    8
    00:00:28.900 --> 00:00:31.700
    perspective. It's been quite the

    9
    00:00:31.700 --> 00:00:34.800
    interesting quarter to say the least we've had

    10
    00:00:34.800 --> 00:00:37.800
    some volatile markets. Although

    11
    00:00:37.800 --> 00:00:40.400
    I'll be at some positive results. We've seen things

    12
    00:00:40.400 --> 00:00:43.300
    like banking collapses in the headlines. There's still of

    13
    00:00:43.300 --> 00:00:46.600
    course the concerns about inflation. And so

    14
    00:00:46.600 --> 00:00:49.800
    Casey thank you for joining us to give us some perspective

    15
    00:00:49.800 --> 00:00:52.300
    of what's going on in the market. So in a

    16
    00:00:52.300 --> 00:00:55.800
    nutshell what happened in q1 of 2023, yeah

    17
    00:00:55.800 --> 00:00:58.300
    in a nutshell, I'll be brief if I

    18
    00:00:58.300 --> 00:01:00.500
    can so if you recall

    19
    00:01:01.800 --> 00:01:04.300
    The fourth quarter of last year, right? The

    20
    00:01:04.300 --> 00:01:07.600
    last year was a brutal year across a number of metrics, but

    21
    00:01:07.600 --> 00:01:10.500
    the fourth quarter we started to see some respite

    22
    00:01:10.500 --> 00:01:13.300
    from that and the first two months of the fourth quarter,

    23
    00:01:13.300 --> 00:01:16.600
    right? We saw markets actually rebound pretty

    24
    00:01:16.600 --> 00:01:19.500
    significantly in October and November and much of

    25
    00:01:19.500 --> 00:01:23.000
    that was driven by the sense across

    26
    00:01:22.700 --> 00:01:25.900
    the markets Market participants that maybe

    27
    00:01:25.900 --> 00:01:28.500
    the Fed was done raising interest rates, maybe

    28
    00:01:28.500 --> 00:01:31.400
    that the inflationary pressures that

    29
    00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:34.700
    we had seen in the spring of 2022. We're

    30
    00:01:34.700 --> 00:01:37.400
    starting to Abate and the market is

    31
    00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:40.800
    a forward-looking forward pricing mechanism. And so

    32
    00:01:42.200 --> 00:01:45.200
    In the fourth quarter, that's what it did. It looked forward.

    33
    00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:48.700
    It started to anticipate a period when the the

    34
    00:01:48.700 --> 00:01:51.300
    Fed was not raising interest rates and inflation would be tamed.

    35
    00:01:51.300 --> 00:01:55.100
    And of course what happened in December was

    36
    00:01:54.100 --> 00:01:57.800
    a bit of a comeuppance for

    37
    00:01:57.800 --> 00:02:00.400
    those Market participants who got a little bit ahead of

    38
    00:02:00.400 --> 00:02:03.500
    the fed and we saw a pullback in

    39
    00:02:03.500 --> 00:02:03.700
    December.

    40
    00:02:04.400 --> 00:02:07.600
    And markets responding to the fact that the FED said well, no,

    41
    00:02:07.600 --> 00:02:10.500
    we're pretty set on continuing to raise rates.

    42
    00:02:10.500 --> 00:02:12.800
    And and we think we're gonna keep them higher longer.

    43
    00:02:13.700 --> 00:02:16.500
    As we rolled into the first quarter of this year. We saw

    44
    00:02:16.500 --> 00:02:19.900
    a replay of a lot of those Dynamics coming into

    45
    00:02:19.900 --> 00:02:23.000
    January Market participants

    46
    00:02:22.300 --> 00:02:24.000
    again. It's sort of

    47
    00:02:25.400 --> 00:02:28.200
    Determined that this was the year the Fed was

    48
    00:02:28.200 --> 00:02:31.100
    going to stop rate and Market participants started to

    49
    00:02:31.100 --> 00:02:34.200
    look forward and price as if the not only

    50
    00:02:34.200 --> 00:02:37.600
    with the FED stop racing rates, but they would start to pull rates

    51
    00:02:37.600 --> 00:02:42.400
    back by the end of the year given where people

    52
    00:02:41.400 --> 00:02:45.300
    reading the tea leaves assumed the

    53
    00:02:45.300 --> 00:02:47.500
    economy would be by mid-year.

    54
    00:02:48.200 --> 00:02:51.800
    And so you saw a really robust Rebound in

    55
    00:02:51.800 --> 00:02:54.000
    January for a lot of the names that have been

    56
    00:02:54.200 --> 00:02:57.900
    really beat up in 2022 specifically the

    57
    00:02:57.900 --> 00:03:01.000
    large cab growth and Tech names and

    58
    00:03:00.300 --> 00:03:03.200
    so there was something of a reversion to

    59
    00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:06.300
    the mean in terms of those names really

    60
    00:03:06.300 --> 00:03:09.500
    leading the charge in January. Those are

    61
    00:03:09.500 --> 00:03:12.200
    the names that were most beaten up in 2022. Those are the

    62
    00:03:12.200 --> 00:03:15.500
    names that snap back fastest in the

    63
    00:03:15.500 --> 00:03:18.500
    first quarter. And so January where we

    64
    00:03:18.500 --> 00:03:22.900
    saw for instance the S&P down 20% for

    65
    00:03:22.900 --> 00:03:25.200
    2022. We saw

    66
    00:03:25.200 --> 00:03:28.100
    a Resurgence just in the month of January the SP was up

    67
    00:03:28.100 --> 00:03:31.400
    like eight percent and the NASDAQ double that right just on the

    68
    00:03:31.400 --> 00:03:34.400
    strength of kind of those large cap Tech names and of course what happened

    69
    00:03:34.400 --> 00:03:38.100
    as we rolled into February the news that

    70
    00:03:37.100 --> 00:03:40.400
    came out on the sort of

    71
    00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:43.400
    economic underpinnings specifically job data for

    72
    00:03:43.400 --> 00:03:47.100
    January really surprised Market

    73
    00:03:46.100 --> 00:03:48.100
    participants because

    74
    00:03:48.200 --> 00:03:52.400
    It was so robust. So strong it exceeded expectations. It

    75
    00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:54.800
    served as a really Stark reminder that we're

    76
    00:03:54.800 --> 00:03:55.500
    not out of the woods yet.

    77
    00:03:56.200 --> 00:03:59.500
    And and it sent shock waves

    78
    00:03:59.500 --> 00:04:02.400
    across the market in the sense that everyone who

    79
    00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:06.000
    had said. Okay. Well now the FED is gonna have to wind this down all

    80
    00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:08.400
    the sudden the the realized maybe not

    81
    00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:11.400
    right not only is the fed maybe not gonna wind this

    82
    00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:14.700
    down because the economy is hotter than we thought it was but we potentially

    83
    00:04:14.700 --> 00:04:17.600
    risk sort of a flare-up of inflation

    84
    00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:20.100
    just as it was coming down and the FED may have

    85
    00:04:20.100 --> 00:04:23.500
    to get more aggressive in in tackling that and

    86
    00:04:23.500 --> 00:04:27.000
    so February saw sort of a revisitation of

    87
    00:04:26.400 --> 00:04:29.500
    those expectations that market participants

    88
    00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:33.100
    had and as we rolled into March then all

    89
    00:04:32.100 --> 00:04:35.800
    eyes were on the Senate

    90
    00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:38.700
    hearings with the the chairman

    91
    00:04:38.700 --> 00:04:41.200
    of the fed and based on his

    92
    00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:44.700
    comments Futures skyrocketed for an expectation

    93
    00:04:44.700 --> 00:04:47.200
    of a 50 basis point raise at

    94
    00:04:47.200 --> 00:04:50.500
    the end of March the Futures went up to like a 70% chance that

    95
    00:04:50.500 --> 00:04:53.300
    the Fed was gonna raise 50 basis points, and

    96
    00:04:53.300 --> 00:04:55.500
    of course what happened then you know days later.

    97
    00:04:56.100 --> 00:05:00.000
    Started imploding right and that sort

    98
    00:04:59.100 --> 00:05:03.000
    of Royal financial markets and

    99
    00:05:02.500 --> 00:05:05.200
    the FED did end up raising rates. But

    100
    00:05:05.200 --> 00:05:08.200
    only by 25 basis points after they had worked to

    101
    00:05:08.200 --> 00:05:11.200
    sort of rescue. I don't know rescues the

    102
    00:05:11.200 --> 00:05:15.500
    right term but step in aggressively and calm markets

    103
    00:05:14.500 --> 00:05:17.200
    particularly folks who

    104
    00:05:17.200 --> 00:05:20.600
    had cash on deposited Banks to keep sort

    105
    00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:23.200
    of a contagion effect and a larger Bank Run taking place.

    106
    00:05:23.200 --> 00:05:26.800
    Right? So we end the first quarter with a really

    107
    00:05:26.800 --> 00:05:29.900
    sort of wild trip of markets shooting

    108
    00:05:29.900 --> 00:05:32.500
    up coming back down a lot of volatility a lot

    109
    00:05:32.500 --> 00:05:35.400
    of fear injected in markets in March with the

    110
    00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:38.300
    headlines and yet at the end of the quarter you finished up

    111
    00:05:38.300 --> 00:05:41.900
    pretty again pretty solidly across

    112
    00:05:41.900 --> 00:05:45.000
    us markets International Development markets emerging

    113
    00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:47.700
    markets in fixed income inequities, right?

    114
    00:05:47.700 --> 00:05:50.400
    We it was a it was a pretty decent first

    115
    00:05:50.400 --> 00:05:53.800
    quarter from a return perspective despite all of that. Yeah sure.

    116
    00:05:53.800 --> 00:05:56.000
    It was like it's a very interesting quarter.

    117
    00:05:56.100 --> 00:05:59.200
    And I'd like the way you put it on the things the kind of the Resurgence of

    118
    00:05:59.200 --> 00:06:03.100
    these tech companies that didn't have a great year last year, but you're

    119
    00:06:02.100 --> 00:06:05.500
    seeing asset classes such as the energy

    120
    00:06:05.500 --> 00:06:08.600
    sector right who had a great year last year is to

    121
    00:06:08.600 --> 00:06:11.300
    use your your term of aversion to the mean right? They had

    122
    00:06:11.300 --> 00:06:14.500
    a tough time in the first quarter, right? Yeah. Yeah and and frankly

    123
    00:06:14.500 --> 00:06:18.200
    prices have been coming down in oil and gas pretty

    124
    00:06:17.200 --> 00:06:18.800
    consistently.

    125
    00:06:19.200 --> 00:06:22.800
    Since last fall so we did see a continuation of that. I

    126
    00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:27.300
    do think and likely there's

    127
    00:06:26.300 --> 00:06:29.200
    more conversation to be had

    128
    00:06:29.200 --> 00:06:32.900
    around this but the concern that I have or

    129
    00:06:32.900 --> 00:06:35.500
    or would have based on

    130
    00:06:35.500 --> 00:06:38.600
    how markets performed in the first quarter is that

    131
    00:06:38.600 --> 00:06:41.900
    it was so dominated by a

    132
    00:06:41.900 --> 00:06:44.100
    handful of names, right? We we've seen

    133
    00:06:44.100 --> 00:06:47.300
    this Dynamic before where we're

    134
    00:06:47.300 --> 00:06:51.000
    sort of the top largest growth Tech

    135
    00:06:50.300 --> 00:06:53.800
    names sort of dominate performance

    136
    00:06:53.800 --> 00:06:56.500
    of the market and we and we saw that again in

    137
    00:06:56.500 --> 00:07:01.500
    the first quarter right? You think about Facebook alphabet

    138
    00:07:00.500 --> 00:07:04.700
    Apple Google Netflix, right?

    139
    00:07:03.700 --> 00:07:06.500
    All of those firms were

    140
    00:07:06.500 --> 00:07:09.500
    really been challenged in 2022 had a

    141
    00:07:09.500 --> 00:07:12.300
    nice Resurgence across the first quarter, but when

    142
    00:07:12.300 --> 00:07:16.000
    you dig deeper into the performance particularly here domestically what

    143
    00:07:15.200 --> 00:07:18.900
    you see is they were the lion

    144
    00:07:19.100 --> 00:07:22.400
    Care of that return that we saw the market it was once again

    145
    00:07:22.400 --> 00:07:27.100
    the fact that these top handful of names represent twenty

    146
    00:07:25.100 --> 00:07:28.600
    plus percent of the overall

    147
    00:07:28.600 --> 00:07:32.000
    market, right? So think S&P 500 has got ostensibly 500

    148
    00:07:31.500 --> 00:07:34.700
    names in it the top 10 names

    149
    00:07:34.700 --> 00:07:38.000
    accounted for all at

    150
    00:07:37.100 --> 00:07:40.400
    least 80% of that return right the

    151
    00:07:40.400 --> 00:07:43.300
    top top five names half of it, right? So so

    152
    00:07:43.300 --> 00:07:46.400
    again, you're getting a lot of that return concentrated in

    153
    00:07:46.400 --> 00:07:47.000
    these names.

    154
    00:07:47.900 --> 00:07:51.600
    Because they're so large disproportionately to

    155
    00:07:50.600 --> 00:07:55.200
    the other names in those indices

    156
    00:07:54.200 --> 00:07:57.300
    and it lit. It's the rising tide lifting

    157
    00:07:57.300 --> 00:08:00.200
    all boats, but the concern that you

    158
    00:08:00.200 --> 00:08:03.100
    have with that and we saw that in 2022 when the

    159
    00:08:03.100 --> 00:08:06.600
    air goes out of the balloon to a degree. Well that

    160
    00:08:06.600 --> 00:08:09.500
    can be a double-edged sword. Right if those names start

    161
    00:08:09.500 --> 00:08:13.000
    to pull back in valuations, you

    162
    00:08:12.300 --> 00:08:15.400
    could see that turn around and become an anchor pulling

    163
    00:08:15.400 --> 00:08:19.000
    markets down, right and that can happen very quickly just based

    164
    00:08:18.100 --> 00:08:21.600
    on the fact that it's so concentrated in a

    165
    00:08:21.600 --> 00:08:24.000
    handful of names that are all sort of in the

    166
    00:08:24.300 --> 00:08:27.100
    same kind of economic Waters right in terms of kind of

    167
    00:08:27.100 --> 00:08:30.600
    this large growth Tech, you know richly valued.

    168
    00:08:30.600 --> 00:08:33.100
    Yeah. It sounds a lot like me, you know, I've

    169
    00:08:33.100 --> 00:08:37.200
    had these conversations over the years even going back before 2022

    170
    00:08:36.200 --> 00:08:39.700
    coming out of the pandemic

    171
    00:08:39.700 --> 00:08:42.300
    and those tech stocks. They were the story they were leading

    172
    00:08:42.300 --> 00:08:45.400
    the charge and what I'm hearing you say, is that sort

    173
    00:08:45.400 --> 00:08:47.800
    of the casing q1, but that double-ed

    174
    00:08:47.800 --> 00:08:50.700
    word is just going back 2022 would

    175
    00:08:50.700 --> 00:08:53.700
    be an example of if you're not well Diversified

    176
    00:08:53.700 --> 00:08:56.800
    that could be a painful experience it can and I'm

    177
    00:08:56.800 --> 00:08:57.900
    I'm reminded of

    178
    00:08:59.300 --> 00:09:02.400
    The experience that we had coming out of the tech bubble,

    179
    00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:05.300
    right? So if you think about if in fact

    180
    00:09:05.300 --> 00:09:08.300
    the run-up invaluations in this sort of handful of

    181
    00:09:08.300 --> 00:09:11.400
    techniques is analogous to what we saw in

    182
    00:09:11.400 --> 00:09:12.000
    the late 90s.

    183
    00:09:14.200 --> 00:09:17.300
    They were so richly valued that when the

    184
    00:09:17.300 --> 00:09:20.600
    tech Bubble Burst it took a decade the Lost

    185
    00:09:20.600 --> 00:09:24.200
    decade right of just you know, subpar returns

    186
    00:09:23.200 --> 00:09:26.300
    for the valuations to get

    187
    00:09:26.300 --> 00:09:29.500
    back to a place where markets could then start

    188
    00:09:29.500 --> 00:09:32.400
    to take off again. And so the concern that

    189
    00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:36.200
    that one might have is valuations are

    190
    00:09:35.200 --> 00:09:40.400
    still Rich, right? Even after 2022 on

    191
    00:09:39.400 --> 00:09:43.200
    a Price to Book basis very

    192
    00:09:42.200 --> 00:09:45.600
    expensive on a price to

    193
    00:09:45.600 --> 00:09:50.500
    forward earnings basis. It's expensive and

    194
    00:09:48.500 --> 00:09:51.600
    so it's not

    195
    00:09:51.600 --> 00:09:54.600
    as if these are our Bargains to

    196
    00:09:54.600 --> 00:09:57.800
    be had in a Marketplace that that's discounting

    197
    00:09:57.800 --> 00:10:00.700
    them. They are still incredibly expensive. And so

    198
    00:10:00.700 --> 00:10:03.400
    anything that goes wrong right if the

    199
    00:10:03.400 --> 00:10:06.300
    if in fact the economy runs into turbulence at

    200
    00:10:06.300 --> 00:10:09.700
    some point or the expectations for growth, I mean,

    201
    00:10:09.700 --> 00:10:12.600
    you know, we're in earning season and Netflix had sort

    202
    00:10:12.600 --> 00:10:14.100
    of positive numbers, but

    203
    00:10:14.100 --> 00:10:17.700
    They sort of gave lackluster guidance for next quarters

    204
    00:10:17.700 --> 00:10:20.400
    growth. Right? So all you need is for for Market

    205
    00:10:20.400 --> 00:10:23.400
    participants to to a once again sour on the

    206
    00:10:23.400 --> 00:10:27.400
    prospects of these names and you're right back to it's

    207
    00:10:26.400 --> 00:10:29.300
    too too rich like I'm paying

    208
    00:10:29.300 --> 00:10:32.500
    too much today for for earnings in

    209
    00:10:32.500 --> 00:10:35.100
    the future that may or may not materialize right? And so

    210
    00:10:35.100 --> 00:10:38.700
    I've got to pay less and so the price has to come down. Yeah, right. And

    211
    00:10:38.700 --> 00:10:41.300
    again, I'm not suggesting that we have a lost decade

    212
    00:10:41.300 --> 00:10:44.200
    in front of us, but this potentially room to run

    213
    00:10:44.200 --> 00:10:48.300
    if markets turn and I think that's the the concern that

    214
    00:10:47.300 --> 00:10:50.100
    I would share with investors. That's what I

    215
    00:10:50.100 --> 00:10:53.500
    prepare them for. Hey, we'll take what we get. Right? We're happy

    216
    00:10:53.500 --> 00:10:54.700
    to get those returns, but

    217
    00:10:56.200 --> 00:10:59.500
    This could still be valve this this, you know, we're in the third inning potentially

    218
    00:10:59.500 --> 00:11:02.900
    look or fourth ending. There's a lot of game left and we're

    219
    00:11:02.900 --> 00:11:05.000
    just gonna buckle up and be ready for it. Yeah, and what is

    220
    00:11:05.300 --> 00:11:09.200
    interesting what this quarter and you detect upon that I'd love to get your thoughts developed International

    221
    00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:11.300
    to having a very good quarter.

    222
    00:11:11.300 --> 00:11:14.400
    I mean when we saw these large Tech

    223
    00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:17.600
    names and in the past when they had their run prior to 2022, it

    224
    00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:20.600
    was a pretty much us dominated run up.

    225
    00:11:21.800 --> 00:11:24.500
    Give us some commentary on what we're saying in the developed International

    226
    00:11:24.500 --> 00:11:27.100
    Space. Yeah, I think some of

    227
    00:11:27.100 --> 00:11:31.600
    it is the Resurgence of the

    228
    00:11:32.900 --> 00:11:35.700
    strength of the sort

    229
    00:11:35.700 --> 00:11:38.200
    of the the companies that are there that have

    230
    00:11:38.200 --> 00:11:42.000
    sort of suffered through a decade of kind of sub-par performance

    231
    00:11:41.300 --> 00:11:45.400
    and they were in a much stronger financial

    232
    00:11:44.400 --> 00:11:47.300
    position. Then they

    233
    00:11:47.300 --> 00:11:51.300
    were for instance going into the global financial crisis, right and they

    234
    00:11:50.300 --> 00:11:53.700
    weren't super expensive. Right?

    235
    00:11:53.700 --> 00:11:58.100
    So from a perspective of they were kind of relatively cheaply

    236
    00:11:56.100 --> 00:11:59.100
    priced compared to

    237
    00:11:59.100 --> 00:12:02.500
    US stocks. And so if we look at just the performance

    238
    00:12:02.500 --> 00:12:06.100
    the they don't have to have that much right

    239
    00:12:05.100 --> 00:12:09.300
    surprise upside.

    240
    00:12:10.300 --> 00:12:14.300
    To have nice performance right across the board or

    241
    00:12:13.300 --> 00:12:16.200
    relatively decent performs.

    242
    00:12:16.700 --> 00:12:19.800
    So I think people were pleasantly surprised by

    243
    00:12:19.800 --> 00:12:23.500
    some of the financial resilience in

    244
    00:12:22.500 --> 00:12:25.200
    Europe particularly coming out of

    245
    00:12:25.200 --> 00:12:28.900
    the effects of the the Russian Ukraine

    246
    00:12:28.900 --> 00:12:31.600
    conflict and looking at the impact that

    247
    00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:34.500
    for instance the the price of gas price

    248
    00:12:34.500 --> 00:12:37.100
    of oil I had in places like Germany and the fact

    249
    00:12:37.100 --> 00:12:40.300
    that they sort of got through that not unscathed but

    250
    00:12:40.300 --> 00:12:43.700
    you know, the the avoided the apocalypse

    251
    00:12:43.700 --> 00:12:47.000
    right the gasoline apocalypse over the course of the

    252
    00:12:46.600 --> 00:12:49.300
    winter right that it was relatively mild. So

    253
    00:12:49.300 --> 00:12:52.600
    I think that from that perspective markets sort

    254
    00:12:52.600 --> 00:12:55.600
    of said rewarded International developed

    255
    00:12:55.600 --> 00:12:58.900
    businesses with valuations that

    256
    00:12:58.900 --> 00:13:01.400
    seemed a little more reasonable than the

    257
    00:13:01.400 --> 00:13:04.000
    valuations in the US. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense and thank you

    258
    00:13:04.200 --> 00:13:07.900
    for that. Yeah, and and I would call I would suggest that

    259
    00:13:07.900 --> 00:13:10.200
    Emerging Markets are in a similar but

    260
    00:13:10.200 --> 00:13:14.300
    different position right again a little more financially

    261
    00:13:13.300 --> 00:13:16.300
    robust in terms of the underpinnings.

    262
    00:13:17.300 --> 00:13:20.100
    Of those companies relative to where we've seen Cycles where people

    263
    00:13:20.100 --> 00:13:23.100
    are risk off and and sort of beating down

    264
    00:13:23.100 --> 00:13:26.200
    in price. I think anytime you have a lot of volatility people are

    265
    00:13:26.200 --> 00:13:29.700
    hesitant to take a bunch of risk. So Emerging Markets

    266
    00:13:29.700 --> 00:13:32.800
    could be a little more volatile as you would expect but

    267
    00:13:32.800 --> 00:13:35.100
    I think from evaluation standpoint there's room to run

    268
    00:13:35.100 --> 00:13:38.600
    as well over time relative to the US let's let's

    269
    00:13:38.600 --> 00:13:41.300
    look at the other side of the coin and talk a

    270
    00:13:41.300 --> 00:13:44.500
    little bit about bonds because that's been quite the Hot Topic lately. We've been

    271
    00:13:44.500 --> 00:13:47.900
    getting a lot of inquiries from advisors and investors alike

    272
    00:13:47.900 --> 00:13:50.700
    about the fixed income market. So give us

    273
    00:13:50.700 --> 00:13:52.300
    a little perspective of what's happening in.

    274
    00:13:53.500 --> 00:13:57.300
    Global fixed income right? Well, if you recall 2022

    275
    00:13:56.300 --> 00:13:59.500
    was a historically bad year

    276
    00:13:59.500 --> 00:14:02.900
    for Boston certainly, right as as fed as

    277
    00:14:02.900 --> 00:14:05.500
    the FED raised interest rates are not just the FED but central banks

    278
    00:14:05.500 --> 00:14:08.500
    essentially around the world except for the Asian

    279
    00:14:08.500 --> 00:14:11.100
    China and Japan those central banks not quite

    280
    00:14:11.100 --> 00:14:14.600
    as much but globally central banks at the

    281
    00:14:14.600 --> 00:14:17.600
    impact of course of challenging the yield right

    282
    00:14:17.600 --> 00:14:20.900
    and as we know yield in price or are sort of inverse Lee

    283
    00:14:20.900 --> 00:14:23.300
    related and so as yield was pushed up by raising

    284
    00:14:23.300 --> 00:14:26.900
    rates price came down and and it had a pretty dramatic

    285
    00:14:26.900 --> 00:14:29.900
    impact across the yield curve

    286
    00:14:29.900 --> 00:14:32.400
    and that was globally as well the United

    287
    00:14:32.400 --> 00:14:32.400
    States.

    288
    00:14:33.200 --> 00:14:36.400
    2022 pretty much a very bad. No good year for

    289
    00:14:36.400 --> 00:14:39.400
    Bond holders rolling into the first quarter

    290
    00:14:39.400 --> 00:14:42.400
    a lot of those same sort of macro dynamics that

    291
    00:14:42.400 --> 00:14:45.400
    we talked about with equities was

    292
    00:14:45.400 --> 00:14:48.500
    true to fix income as well the expectation the bond

    293
    00:14:48.500 --> 00:14:51.800
    market pricing that they think the FED will essentially

    294
    00:14:51.800 --> 00:14:54.600
    be done at some point this year raising rates

    295
    00:14:54.600 --> 00:14:58.100
    had the impact of markets rallying

    296
    00:14:57.100 --> 00:15:01.300
    to a degree and then of course when there

    297
    00:15:00.300 --> 00:15:04.100
    was volatility injected because of banking issues

    298
    00:15:03.100 --> 00:15:07.300
    you continued to see a pullback

    299
    00:15:06.300 --> 00:15:09.700
    on the the yield

    300
    00:15:09.700 --> 00:15:13.000
    right? So at at some points we saw for instance

    301
    00:15:12.200 --> 00:15:15.400
    the the 10 year get up over four and we

    302
    00:15:15.400 --> 00:15:18.500
    saw a pullback as yields come down then of course prices go

    303
    00:15:18.500 --> 00:15:21.400
    up. And so you saw a nice robust kind of response over

    304
    00:15:21.400 --> 00:15:24.500
    the first quarter of prices coming up for bonds that had

    305
    00:15:24.500 --> 00:15:27.500
    the impact and that was true for treasuries and corporates

    306
    00:15:27.500 --> 00:15:30.400
    and international bonds, right? So across the

    307
    00:15:30.400 --> 00:15:32.900
    Spectrum you had sort of a nice performance.

    308
    00:15:33.300 --> 00:15:37.100
    For bonds for the first quarter. And again, it's unusual

    309
    00:15:36.100 --> 00:15:39.400
    for fixed income and Equity to look and

    310
    00:15:39.400 --> 00:15:42.100
    behave very similarly. That was one of

    311
    00:15:42.100 --> 00:15:45.700
    the things that was so unusual about 2022, but there's still

    312
    00:15:45.700 --> 00:15:48.500
    sort of Behaving the same way based on the same Outlook

    313
    00:15:48.500 --> 00:15:51.500
    that at some point interest rates stop going up

    314
    00:15:51.500 --> 00:15:54.500
    or stop getting ratcheted up by central banks.

    315
    00:15:54.500 --> 00:15:57.100
    And so that Dynamic is is kind of

    316
    00:15:57.100 --> 00:16:00.700
    floating all the boats to this degree and so

    317
    00:16:00.700 --> 00:16:03.500
    fixed income has had a robust first quarter.

    318
    00:16:04.400 --> 00:16:07.700
    Remains to be seen how the rest of the year plays

    319
    00:16:07.700 --> 00:16:10.400
    out and and you know, frankly we

    320
    00:16:10.400 --> 00:16:13.200
    continued to see the a deep

    321
    00:16:13.200 --> 00:16:16.200
    inversion in the yield curve, especially at the

    322
    00:16:16.200 --> 00:16:19.100
    very shortest end of the O curve relative to the

    323
    00:16:19.100 --> 00:16:22.700
    10 year. And as you know that has historically sort

    324
    00:16:22.700 --> 00:16:25.300
    of been a warning sign of

    325
    00:16:25.300 --> 00:16:28.600
    potential economic stress recessions right

    326
    00:16:28.600 --> 00:16:32.100
    as an indicator and it has remained it

    327
    00:16:31.100 --> 00:16:34.100
    inverted for some time now

    328
    00:16:34.100 --> 00:16:37.900
    and that inversion has only gotten deeper on the shortest end. So,

    329
    00:16:37.900 --> 00:16:40.200
    you know again you would want to continue

    330
    00:16:40.200 --> 00:16:43.700
    to watch that and be cognizant of it. I think the takeaway

    331
    00:16:43.700 --> 00:16:46.500
    from this is much like with equities. It's best

    332
    00:16:46.500 --> 00:16:49.200
    to be sort of broad based Diversified. You never

    333
    00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:53.000
    know what part of the Yoke curve is gonna move relative to this and

    334
    00:16:52.900 --> 00:16:56.800
    it's good to have exposure

    335
    00:16:55.800 --> 00:16:58.600
    not just us treasuries, but

    336
    00:16:58.600 --> 00:17:01.200
    the corporates and not just us bonds, but the international

    337
    00:17:01.200 --> 00:17:04.300
    bonds that there are benefits built into the pricing of all

    338
    00:17:04.900 --> 00:17:08.400
    And as we start to see a decoupling of Central

    339
    00:17:07.400 --> 00:17:10.400
    Bank activity, yes, they've been

    340
    00:17:10.400 --> 00:17:13.700
    acting pretty much in concert, but at some point central banks

    341
    00:17:13.700 --> 00:17:16.800
    start to peel off right and they get back to focusing on

    342
    00:17:16.800 --> 00:17:19.100
    the handling kind of

    343
    00:17:19.100 --> 00:17:22.300
    their domestic concerns. And as they do that it will

    344
    00:17:22.300 --> 00:17:25.600
    have varying diversification impacts for bonds

    345
    00:17:25.600 --> 00:17:28.500
    around the globe the way stocks and bonds behaves

    346
    00:17:28.500 --> 00:17:31.300
    in 2022 with similar and then into this quarter. We're

    347
    00:17:31.300 --> 00:17:34.500
    seeing some decent returns globally across those two

    348
    00:17:34.500 --> 00:17:37.800
    macro asset classes. We're seeing

    349
    00:17:37.800 --> 00:17:40.300
    some of a mixed bag that last Factor investors

    350
    00:17:40.300 --> 00:17:43.400
    from a factor perspective, right? But let's

    351
    00:17:43.400 --> 00:17:46.200
    shift a little bit and talk about factors for a moment.

    352
    00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:49.300
    We're a factor investors are listeners The Avengers that

    353
    00:17:49.300 --> 00:17:52.300
    we work with our have clients invested in

    354
    00:17:52.300 --> 00:17:55.500
    these Factor portfolios. What did we see from a factor standpoint

    355
    00:17:55.500 --> 00:17:58.800
    in the first quarter of 2023 if

    356
    00:17:58.800 --> 00:18:01.400
    you think about the factor of value, it's just the the

    357
    00:18:01.400 --> 00:18:04.300
    cheaper stocks outperform the more expensive stocks over time and as

    358
    00:18:04.300 --> 00:18:04.500
    you know,

    359
    00:18:04.800 --> 00:18:07.800
    We had a long run where that wasn't true. Right we're

    360
    00:18:07.800 --> 00:18:10.300
    growth stocks were just outperforming value to the

    361
    00:18:10.300 --> 00:18:13.200
    point that everybody was sort of Naval gazing wondering his value

    362
    00:18:13.200 --> 00:18:16.800
    dead. Does this even make sense anymore? And and what

    363
    00:18:16.800 --> 00:18:19.400
    we sort of looking at it determined was

    364
    00:18:19.400 --> 00:18:22.400
    no actually values kind of in line with what it's always done. It's

    365
    00:18:22.400 --> 00:18:25.300
    growth. That's so unusual. Yeah, right and that we're

    366
    00:18:25.300 --> 00:18:28.300
    back to the story about the large tech stocks and get over evaluation. Right?

    367
    00:18:28.300 --> 00:18:31.900
    And so last year was a great year for Value, right? Even

    368
    00:18:31.900 --> 00:18:34.500
    though it was down right value outperform growth

    369
    00:18:34.500 --> 00:18:37.800
    by a good 20% Oh, yeah, absolutely and it

    370
    00:18:37.800 --> 00:18:40.700
    was sort of that Snapback to recognition of

    371
    00:18:40.700 --> 00:18:43.300
    hey one of my paying for right and and these things

    372
    00:18:43.300 --> 00:18:46.200
    have gotten incredibly overvalued on the

    373
    00:18:46.200 --> 00:18:46.600
    growth side.

    374
    00:18:47.300 --> 00:18:50.500
    And so it shouldn't come as a surprise then if there's a reversal of

    375
    00:18:50.500 --> 00:18:53.600
    that Dynamic that value might underperform growth

    376
    00:18:53.600 --> 00:18:56.500
    over the first quarter. And of course, that's what we observed right

    377
    00:18:56.500 --> 00:18:59.300
    that value underperformed growth. It was

    378
    00:18:59.300 --> 00:19:02.300
    those large kind of growthy names that took off and and so that

    379
    00:19:02.300 --> 00:19:05.700
    that factor shows up and demonstrates

    380
    00:19:05.700 --> 00:19:08.300
    that thighs right. So again kind of

    381
    00:19:08.300 --> 00:19:11.600
    the academic research that smaller cap

    382
    00:19:11.600 --> 00:19:14.400
    names tend to outperform larger cab

    383
    00:19:14.400 --> 00:19:17.800
    names over time rolling into the first quarter large

    384
    00:19:17.800 --> 00:19:20.500
    caps outperform small caps, right again being led

    385
    00:19:20.500 --> 00:19:23.500
    by that large growthy and so small caps

    386
    00:19:23.500 --> 00:19:26.800
    tended to underperform in general. What's interesting

    387
    00:19:26.800 --> 00:19:29.300
    is across factor is

    388
    00:19:29.300 --> 00:19:32.300
    one of the reasons you want to hold small caps isn't necessarily the size

    389
    00:19:32.300 --> 00:19:35.300
    Factor premium associated with that because

    390
    00:19:35.300 --> 00:19:38.700
    that's come under some scrutiny of

    391
    00:19:38.700 --> 00:19:41.400
    Lee as academics kind of look at that. Say what

    392
    00:19:41.400 --> 00:19:42.200
    do we actually getting here?

    393
    00:19:42.900 --> 00:19:46.000
    But what really expresses itself

    394
    00:19:45.300 --> 00:19:48.500
    in small camp names or all the other factors, right? So

    395
    00:19:48.500 --> 00:19:51.100
    the reason you'd want to hold a small cap is not just

    396
    00:19:51.100 --> 00:19:54.200
    because you get a benefit versus large caps, but because you get

    397
    00:19:54.200 --> 00:19:57.600
    a really strong value signal a really strong momentum really

    398
    00:19:57.600 --> 00:20:00.200
    strong quality, right all of these things. And so if we

    399
    00:20:00.200 --> 00:20:03.300
    look at small caps the performance of small caps for

    400
    00:20:03.300 --> 00:20:06.700
    the first quarter, you actually got to really strong quality signal

    401
    00:20:06.700 --> 00:20:09.700
    in small caps. So again a reason

    402
    00:20:09.700 --> 00:20:12.400
    why you want to have a multiple exposures for your

    403
    00:20:12.400 --> 00:20:15.400
    factors not just pick any one of these right so small

    404
    00:20:15.400 --> 00:20:18.400
    caps under form large caps, but quality did really well inside

    405
    00:20:18.400 --> 00:20:21.300
    small camps that makes up the next category is

    406
    00:20:21.300 --> 00:20:24.400
    momentum. And what's interesting about markets that are sort of

    407
    00:20:24.400 --> 00:20:27.500
    whipsawing one way or the other that momentum tends to

    408
    00:20:27.500 --> 00:20:30.400
    have a tougher time in markets where the signal is really

    409
    00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:33.100
    hard to pick up where there's a lot of whipsawing effect up and down on the

    410
    00:20:33.100 --> 00:20:37.000
    other way momentum tends to kind of get whipped around with that.

    411
    00:20:37.700 --> 00:20:40.200
    Eventually when markets start to pick

    412
    00:20:40.200 --> 00:20:43.300
    up Trend whether that's down for a significant period of

    413
    00:20:43.300 --> 00:20:46.500
    time like in 2022 momentum does well or up right

    414
    00:20:46.500 --> 00:20:50.000
    for a significant period of time and so you

    415
    00:20:49.200 --> 00:20:52.400
    would expect momentum to kind

    416
    00:20:52.400 --> 00:20:55.400
    of settle down as markets kind of settle down

    417
    00:20:55.400 --> 00:20:59.600
    and we see less whipsawing and more directionality. However, and

    418
    00:20:59.600 --> 00:21:03.300
    I mentioned it earlier with small caps quality this idea

    419
    00:21:02.300 --> 00:21:05.000
    that there may be

    420
    00:21:05.200 --> 00:21:08.800
    a flight to Quality in times when the

    421
    00:21:08.800 --> 00:21:11.100
    there's a lot of volatility. Well one of the

    422
    00:21:11.100 --> 00:21:14.800
    reasons you see that is because higher quality earnings tend to

    423
    00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:17.400
    hold up better in downturns. They have a premium

    424
    00:21:17.400 --> 00:21:21.300
    associated with them and we saw that very clearly quality

    425
    00:21:20.300 --> 00:21:23.200
    was one of the areas that outperformed the market

    426
    00:21:23.200 --> 00:21:26.200
    over the first quarter and that was true not just in the

    427
    00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:30.200
    US but internationally as well interestingly in

    428
    00:21:29.200 --> 00:21:33.500
    Emerging Markets value quality

    429
    00:21:32.500 --> 00:21:35.600
    and low volatility did quite

    430
    00:21:35.600 --> 00:21:37.600
    well so value was still doing well in emerging.

    431
    00:21:37.700 --> 00:21:40.700
    Markets again a reason why you'd want to diversify

    432
    00:21:40.700 --> 00:21:43.400
    your Factor exposures not just in the US but

    433
    00:21:43.400 --> 00:21:46.900
    internationally as well and minimum volatility was

    434
    00:21:46.900 --> 00:21:49.800
    a contributor in us but lagged Market

    435
    00:21:49.800 --> 00:21:52.500
    beta on the whole a broadly

    436
    00:21:52.500 --> 00:21:55.900
    Diversified Factor exposure was I'd

    437
    00:21:55.900 --> 00:21:58.700
    say depending on what your tilts are helpful on

    438
    00:21:58.700 --> 00:22:02.200
    the downside when Market was volatile, but lagged

    439
    00:22:01.200 --> 00:22:04.900
    Market beta to a degree for the

    440
    00:22:04.900 --> 00:22:07.500
    first quarter where it outperformed in

    441
    00:22:07.500 --> 00:22:10.400
    2022. So again factors are a

    442
    00:22:10.400 --> 00:22:13.500
    long term investment. You wouldn't do it on based

    443
    00:22:13.500 --> 00:22:16.700
    on one quarter, but we we watch the horse race, right? Yeah.

    444
    00:22:16.700 --> 00:22:19.200
    Absolutely and I think a point that you

    445
    00:22:19.200 --> 00:22:22.400
    you said that really resonated with me is the notion of how these factors work

    446
    00:22:22.400 --> 00:22:25.800
    together right size and quality you mentioned

    447
    00:22:25.800 --> 00:22:29.200
    and so having a diverse portfolio

    448
    00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:30.700
    of integrated factors.

    449
    00:22:31.500 --> 00:22:32.800
    maintaining that for the long term

    450
    00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:37.400
    Should reward you over the long term. Yeah, and that's the

    451
    00:22:37.400 --> 00:22:40.800
    expectation. There are lots of factors out

    452
    00:22:40.800 --> 00:22:43.800
    there that have been identified in the academic literature when you

    453
    00:22:43.800 --> 00:22:46.400
    selectively go out and pick a handful of

    454
    00:22:46.400 --> 00:22:49.500
    those factors. The expectation is every single

    455
    00:22:49.500 --> 00:22:52.500
    one of those is going to be a positive contributor to

    456
    00:22:52.500 --> 00:22:55.400
    your portfolio over time, right you you

    457
    00:22:55.400 --> 00:22:58.300
    wouldn't necessarily pick one that you thought. Well, it's gonna be a loser but we're gonna hold on

    458
    00:22:58.300 --> 00:23:01.100
    to it, right you're picking all of these different factors of the

    459
    00:23:01.100 --> 00:23:04.700
    expectation that each one of those is going to be a

    460
    00:23:04.700 --> 00:23:07.300
    positive contributor over a period of time when you

    461
    00:23:07.300 --> 00:23:10.400
    weave them together you sort of iron out

    462
    00:23:10.400 --> 00:23:13.400
    the highs and lows of any one particular factor and

    463
    00:23:13.400 --> 00:23:17.100
    you get that very nice steady stream of

    464
    00:23:16.100 --> 00:23:19.500
    return into your

    465
    00:23:19.500 --> 00:23:22.300
    portfolio. That's generated by those Factor exposures. Yeah.

    466
    00:23:22.300 --> 00:23:25.400
    It's the old the old adage we're going for singles and doubles

    467
    00:23:25.400 --> 00:23:28.200
    not home runs, right? Yeah. Yeah exactly. So let's

    468
    00:23:28.200 --> 00:23:31.200
    talk a little bit about factors and fixed income and then

    469
    00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:34.100
    we can take a look at some of the the factors overseas.

    470
    00:23:34.100 --> 00:23:37.800
    As well, but I do want to spend some time on some of

    471
    00:23:37.800 --> 00:23:40.100
    the headlines. So why don't we

    472
    00:23:40.100 --> 00:23:44.000
    talk a little bit about us fixed income factors? Sure. So

    473
    00:23:43.600 --> 00:23:46.200
    as you know, right fat factors are

    474
    00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:49.800
    not an equity only thing. In fact, we see factors across

    475
    00:23:49.800 --> 00:23:53.600
    all different kinds of assets fixed income Commodities

    476
    00:23:52.600 --> 00:23:55.400
    housing real

    477
    00:23:55.400 --> 00:23:58.400
    estate, right all these I the concept of value for

    478
    00:23:58.400 --> 00:24:01.500
    instance and the concept of momentum right anything that has a price associated

    479
    00:24:01.500 --> 00:24:04.400
    with it stores can demonstrate these sort of

    480
    00:24:04.400 --> 00:24:07.200
    factors. And that's true. In fact fixed income the way we

    481
    00:24:07.200 --> 00:24:10.400
    think about factors and fixed incomes specifically is is kind

    482
    00:24:10.400 --> 00:24:13.400
    of interest rate risk, which is time, right? So think

    483
    00:24:13.400 --> 00:24:17.300
    about what we talked about with the yield curve inversion

    484
    00:24:16.300 --> 00:24:19.400
    and what was going on on the short end versus the

    485
    00:24:19.400 --> 00:24:23.500
    long end what we've observed in the

    486
    00:24:23.500 --> 00:24:26.200
    past. Let's call year was a really

    487
    00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:29.800
    strong interest rate risk lack

    488
    00:24:29.800 --> 00:24:32.600
    of benefit that you got for sort of being paid

    489
    00:24:32.600 --> 00:24:34.000
    over time, right?

    490
    00:24:34.100 --> 00:24:38.300
    And in theory, right you should get paid to hold

    491
    00:24:37.300 --> 00:24:41.100
    over time because there's less certainty

    492
    00:24:40.100 --> 00:24:43.500
    about what the future holds so you demand a

    493
    00:24:43.500 --> 00:24:46.800
    premium to hold something over time to lend over time. And

    494
    00:24:46.800 --> 00:24:49.200
    so when you have the short end

    495
    00:24:49.200 --> 00:24:52.500
    of the curve come up that tends to impact that interest

    496
    00:24:52.500 --> 00:24:55.500
    rate sets that risk that sensitivity because you're

    497
    00:24:55.500 --> 00:24:58.800
    not getting paid over time. You're getting paid actually on the

    498
    00:24:58.800 --> 00:25:01.700
    the shorter end potentially. So when you

    499
    00:25:01.700 --> 00:25:04.800
    see a pullback of rates,

    500
    00:25:04.800 --> 00:25:07.700
    right and price is going up you're seeing

    501
    00:25:07.700 --> 00:25:10.800
    that benefit playing out through the first quarter as well credit risk

    502
    00:25:10.800 --> 00:25:13.300
    is just the difference the buildup over

    503
    00:25:13.300 --> 00:25:16.300
    the risk free rate treasuries to account

    504
    00:25:16.300 --> 00:25:19.200
    for hey, you know a corporation has more risk than a government

    505
    00:25:19.200 --> 00:25:22.500
    and I should be paid that difference. And so you're investing

    506
    00:25:22.500 --> 00:25:25.200
    up and down the various yield curves that

    507
    00:25:25.200 --> 00:25:28.900
    build up on that and in this case credit risk really as

    508
    00:25:28.900 --> 00:25:31.900
    a factor wasn't a very solid contributor

    509
    00:25:31.900 --> 00:25:33.200
    for the first quarter slightly positive.

    510
    00:25:34.100 --> 00:25:37.200
    The the show really has been frankly for the

    511
    00:25:37.200 --> 00:25:40.500
    past 18 months were interest rate risk is in

    512
    00:25:40.500 --> 00:25:43.500
    terms of factor Premia in your portfolios.

    513
    00:25:43.500 --> 00:25:46.500
    And then Market is is again just Market

    514
    00:25:46.500 --> 00:25:49.800
    beta which is a buildup of all these different factors expressing themselves.

    515
    00:25:49.800 --> 00:25:53.200
    So on the whole positive Bond performance

    516
    00:25:52.200 --> 00:25:55.500
    being driven by changes to

    517
    00:25:55.500 --> 00:25:59.500
    the the yield curve in many cases and some

    518
    00:25:58.500 --> 00:26:01.400
    expectation that Bond markets are looking ahead

    519
    00:26:01.400 --> 00:26:04.600
    and pricing for a cessation of rate raises

    520
    00:26:04.600 --> 00:26:07.500
    by central banks. So so my expectation would

    521
    00:26:07.500 --> 00:26:10.200
    be for for fixed income investors again much like

    522
    00:26:10.200 --> 00:26:13.400
    Equity potentially more volatility here, right? The

    523
    00:26:13.400 --> 00:26:16.400
    the rodeo is not over the big bull riding

    524
    00:26:16.400 --> 00:26:18.200
    could yet be to come so

    525
    00:26:19.200 --> 00:26:22.400
    You know stay patient the the benefit here is

    526
    00:26:22.400 --> 00:26:25.400
    there's return associated with fixed income

    527
    00:26:25.400 --> 00:26:29.500
    to a degree. We haven't seen in 15 years. And so

    528
    00:26:29.500 --> 00:26:32.700
    let this play out. And again, these Factor

    529
    00:26:32.700 --> 00:26:35.600
    exposures are the expectation is over time. These are

    530
    00:26:35.600 --> 00:26:38.100
    going to be a additive to the returns that you

    531
    00:26:38.100 --> 00:26:40.700
    get from the bond market you had mentioned this in some of your previous comments.

    532
    00:26:42.500 --> 00:26:45.400
    Factors perform differently geographically too

    533
    00:26:45.400 --> 00:26:48.500
    right like value in the US might give you a different return

    534
    00:26:48.500 --> 00:26:51.300
    versus value and the international develop during the

    535
    00:26:51.300 --> 00:26:54.500
    Emerging Markets Arenas. So I think there's diversification story

    536
    00:26:54.500 --> 00:26:57.600
    there. Can you comment on that, please? Yeah. Well, yes, of

    537
    00:26:57.600 --> 00:27:00.100
    course and and I sort of made a comment

    538
    00:27:00.100 --> 00:27:01.300
    about as

    539
    00:27:02.300 --> 00:27:05.500
    central banks become decoupled and start to operate a

    540
    00:27:05.500 --> 00:27:09.000
    little more independently that it has an impact on the

    541
    00:27:11.300 --> 00:27:14.600
    local economies in all of these different markets as

    542
    00:27:14.600 --> 00:27:17.200
    an impact on their currencies. And so

    543
    00:27:17.200 --> 00:27:20.600
    when you think about fixed income the benefit that you get from

    544
    00:27:20.600 --> 00:27:23.300
    not only where you hold on

    545
    00:27:23.300 --> 00:27:26.500
    the curve and and the amount of credit that you're willing but that

    546
    00:27:26.500 --> 00:27:29.900
    you're going to diversify the various curves

    547
    00:27:29.900 --> 00:27:32.300
    that you hold and the where you

    548
    00:27:32.300 --> 00:27:35.900
    are on that across geographies and

    549
    00:27:35.900 --> 00:27:38.200
    then take into account the impact that

    550
    00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:42.200
    currencies might have right and so we know for equities

    551
    00:27:41.200 --> 00:27:45.100
    the the volatility signature

    552
    00:27:44.100 --> 00:27:47.100
    of equity is is so robust that

    553
    00:27:47.100 --> 00:27:50.600
    you're you tend to be willing to hold the volatility of

    554
    00:27:50.600 --> 00:27:53.900
    fluctuations and currency in in

    555
    00:27:53.900 --> 00:27:56.000
    fixed income. It tends not to pay you to do

    556
    00:27:56.200 --> 00:27:59.400
    that. And so I know for instance

    557
    00:27:59.400 --> 00:28:03.100
    that here at Cemetery you folks hedge back

    558
    00:28:03.100 --> 00:28:07.000
    to the dollar sure and that takes some of that volatility out,

    559
    00:28:06.600 --> 00:28:09.400
    right? And again, I think that's a benefit

    560
    00:28:09.400 --> 00:28:11.000
    for Factor investors because what you're

    561
    00:28:11.200 --> 00:28:14.300
    Is less volatility associated with fluctuations currency and

    562
    00:28:14.300 --> 00:28:18.000
    you're getting maybe stronger signal from these these

    563
    00:28:17.200 --> 00:28:20.900
    different sources of return across

    564
    00:28:20.900 --> 00:28:23.400
    different markets and they're all going to be hitting at

    565
    00:28:23.400 --> 00:28:26.700
    different times. Once the sort of the global economy

    566
    00:28:26.700 --> 00:28:29.200
    comes unpegged to what's going

    567
    00:28:29.200 --> 00:28:33.100
    on fighting inflation. Yeah until I think it's a perfect diversification story

    568
    00:28:32.100 --> 00:28:33.300
    and

    569
    00:28:34.100 --> 00:28:37.600
    we have a saying here that the only free lunch and investing is diversification. And

    570
    00:28:37.600 --> 00:28:40.900
    so we tout that investor should be embracing that Casey.

    571
    00:28:40.900 --> 00:28:43.400
    Thank you so much for joining us that concludes part one.

    572
    00:28:43.400 --> 00:28:46.600
    Please feel free to access other podcasts

    573
    00:28:46.600 --> 00:28:49.000
    that we have done and they can be

    574
    00:28:49.400 --> 00:28:52.600
    accessed anywhere you get your podcast. So please join Casey and

    575
    00:28:52.600 --> 00:28:56.000
    I for part two and our next series symmetry Partners

    576
    00:28:55.700 --> 00:28:58.800
    LLC is an investment advisor firm

    577
    00:28:58.800 --> 00:29:01.700
    registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission The

    578
    00:29:01.700 --> 00:29:04.600
    Firm only transacts business in states where it

    579
    00:29:04.600 --> 00:29:07.500
    is properly registered or excluded or

    580
    00:29:07.500 --> 00:29:11.200
    Exempted from registration requirements registration of

    581
    00:29:10.200 --> 00:29:13.600
    an investment advisor does not imply any

    582
    00:29:13.600 --> 00:29:16.400
    specific level of skill or training and does

    583
    00:29:16.400 --> 00:29:19.100
    not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the

    584
    00:29:19.100 --> 00:29:22.300
    commission. No one should assume that future performance of any

    585
    00:29:22.300 --> 00:29:26.300
    specific investment investment strategy product or

    586
    00:29:25.300 --> 00:29:28.300
    non-investment related content made

    587
    00:29:28.300 --> 00:29:31.800
    reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be

    588
    00:29:31.800 --> 00:29:32.400
    profitable.

    589
    00:29:33.400 --> 00:29:36.500
    As with any investment strategy there is the possibility of

    590
    00:29:36.500 --> 00:29:39.500
    profitability as well as loss due

    591
    00:29:39.500 --> 00:29:42.300
    to various factors including changing market

    592
    00:29:42.300 --> 00:29:44.700
    conditions and/or applicable laws.

    593
    00:29:45.300 --> 00:29:48.900
    The content may not be reflective of current opinions or

    594
    00:29:48.900 --> 00:29:51.600
    positions. Please note the material

    595
    00:29:51.600 --> 00:29:54.300
    is provided for educational and background use only

    596
    00:29:54.300 --> 00:29:58.000
    moreover. You should not assume that any discussion or information

    597
    00:29:57.800 --> 00:30:00.800
    contained in this material Services the

    598
    00:30:00.800 --> 00:30:04.400
    receipt of or as a substitute for personalized

    599
    00:30:03.400 --> 00:30:05.700
    investment advice.

  • Not all financial advisors are created equally. Some have certified credentials, some charge their clients fees, and others may get paid on commission (if they offer investment products). In part two of this podcast episode, our own Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships and Product Development, is joined by Symmetry’s Michael Storer, Senior Regional Director, and a financial advisor from our sister firm, Apella Wealth, Peter Leppones, CFP®, to discuss the important credentials of, and differences between, financial advisors.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    Transcript:

    0
    00:00:01.900 --> 00:00:07.500
    Welcome back

    1
    00:00:07.500 --> 00:00:10.500
    to part 2 of choosing the right financial advisor. This

    2
    00:00:10.500 --> 00:00:13.100
    is Tom Romano with unfiltered finance and I'm back

    3
    00:00:13.100 --> 00:00:16.200
    here with my guests. Mike store senior Regional director at

    4
    00:00:16.200 --> 00:00:20.000
    symmetry partners and Peter laponis financial advisor

    5
    00:00:19.200 --> 00:00:22.200
    and cfp at Apollo wealth. Thank you for joining us

    6
    00:00:22.200 --> 00:00:25.400
    gentlemen, so go Peter certified financial

    7
    00:00:25.400 --> 00:00:28.400
    planner see FP Mike. I'm

    8
    00:00:28.400 --> 00:00:31.800
    asked this question to you because Peter is a cfp. What

    9
    00:00:31.800 --> 00:00:34.700
    are the credential what other credentials that investors should

    10
    00:00:34.700 --> 00:00:37.200
    be looking for as they're going through this process of choosing a

    11
    00:00:37.200 --> 00:00:40.500
    financial advisor. I mean cfp certainly is one of them sure. There's

    12
    00:00:40.500 --> 00:00:43.200
    you know, I mean I come across a wide variety

    13
    00:00:43.200 --> 00:00:47.500
    of different advisors and that have different different designations

    14
    00:00:46.500 --> 00:00:49.300
    and it and sometimes it

    15
    00:00:49.300 --> 00:00:52.400
    depends on it depends on you know, what type

    16
    00:00:52.400 --> 00:00:56.400
    of work they're doing for the client. It may not always be, you know

    17
    00:00:56.400 --> 00:00:59.400
    cfp, but most of the advisors that I'm working with their

    18
    00:00:59.400 --> 00:01:01.500
    certified financial planners, but there's

    19
    00:01:01.900 --> 00:01:05.000
    there's SEMA, you know, which is a certified Investment

    20
    00:01:04.500 --> 00:01:07.800
    Management associate, I

    21
    00:01:07.800 --> 00:01:10.500
    believe and that I look

    22
    00:01:10.500 --> 00:01:13.500
    at CFA and see Sima as kind of two different

    23
    00:01:13.500 --> 00:01:14.300
    designations that

    24
    00:01:15.500 --> 00:01:18.200
    Are are very strong. I mean these people are incredibly smart.

    25
    00:01:18.200 --> 00:01:21.700
    They pass a lot of tests to get where they are. But I

    26
    00:01:21.700 --> 00:01:24.500
    look at the see the SEMA and the

    27
    00:01:24.500 --> 00:01:27.300
    the CFA which is a chartered financial

    28
    00:01:27.300 --> 00:01:31.100
    analyst as more geared towards Investments to

    29
    00:01:30.100 --> 00:01:33.300
    a certain extent. So they're if you've

    30
    00:01:33.300 --> 00:01:37.000
    got an advisor that is more seamors or CFA oriented.

    31
    00:01:36.500 --> 00:01:40.300
    I think you're probably you could and Peter

    32
    00:01:39.300 --> 00:01:42.900
    you can correct me if I'm wrong lean more

    33
    00:01:42.900 --> 00:01:45.800
    towards them probably approaching it from an investment perspective.

    34
    00:01:45.800 --> 00:01:49.100
    Whereas I think a cfp is

    35
    00:01:48.100 --> 00:01:52.100
    going to approach the relationship from everything

    36
    00:01:51.100 --> 00:01:54.400
    that Peter just talked about in terms of how they

    37
    00:01:54.400 --> 00:01:57.200
    want to how they want to work with you moving

    38
    00:01:57.200 --> 00:02:00.300
    forward Investments are important no doubt, but I think from

    39
    00:02:00.300 --> 00:02:03.700
    the standpoint of the approach if

    40
    00:02:03.700 --> 00:02:06.200
    you're looking for a planner, you know a cfp is

    41
    00:02:06.200 --> 00:02:10.000
    where you want to be if you want someone that's more focused on. Okay, I'll construct

    42
    00:02:09.300 --> 00:02:12.800
    a portfolio for you, but I think Sima and

    43
    00:02:12.800 --> 00:02:15.300
    CFA tend to lose tend to

    44
    00:02:15.400 --> 00:02:18.200
    Themselves more towards investment only to a certain

    45
    00:02:18.200 --> 00:02:21.400
    extent now that's not every single or CFA but I think from that

    46
    00:02:21.400 --> 00:02:24.400
    perspective those types of designations. Those are the ones that I come across

    47
    00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:27.700
    primarily obviously, there's other designations with

    48
    00:02:27.700 --> 00:02:30.400
    the insurance realm that you know, you like a

    49
    00:02:30.400 --> 00:02:33.200
    chfc that would be which I

    50
    00:02:33.200 --> 00:02:36.400
    I don't even remember that. It's a chartered leave its chartered Financial

    51
    00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:39.700
    consult consultant, right which is different than a chartered financial analyst

    52
    00:02:39.700 --> 00:02:42.400
    which is kind of interesting but you know, they'd be focused more on

    53
    00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:45.500
    and probably the insurance side of the investment process.

    54
    00:02:45.500 --> 00:02:48.200
    So I come across a lot but I would say

    55
    00:02:48.200 --> 00:02:51.900
    that I feel comfortable saying it that the

    56
    00:02:51.900 --> 00:02:55.400
    cfp is the designation where you know, mostly you're

    57
    00:02:55.400 --> 00:02:58.600
    going to be getting more of a planning approach. Whereas I

    58
    00:02:58.600 --> 00:03:02.200
    think the other designations might lean towards something else within

    59
    00:03:01.200 --> 00:03:04.700
    the whole scope of planning but more,

    60
    00:03:04.700 --> 00:03:07.100
    you know designated or specific on that

    61
    00:03:07.100 --> 00:03:11.000
    side sure. I think it's important, you know, individuals professionals

    62
    00:03:10.500 --> 00:03:14.000
    regardless of the industry having credentials after

    63
    00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:15.400
    their name shows that they're

    64
    00:03:15.400 --> 00:03:18.600
    to the business. They're probably lifelong Learners,

    65
    00:03:18.600 --> 00:03:23.000
    which is something you probably want to look for in a financial advisor. And

    66
    00:03:21.200 --> 00:03:25.300
    I would agree with you a cfp

    67
    00:03:24.300 --> 00:03:27.600
    is probably the starting point. However, the

    68
    00:03:27.600 --> 00:03:31.000
    the SEMA the Cima in the CFA,

    69
    00:03:30.200 --> 00:03:33.900
    which I would agree are more investment driven.

    70
    00:03:35.700 --> 00:03:38.100
    Um working with a firm who has a cfp has the point

    71
    00:03:38.100 --> 00:03:41.300
    of contact Peter, but that doesn't mean you don't have access to

    72
    00:03:41.300 --> 00:03:44.500
    cfa's and seamas as well. Right, correct. And

    73
    00:03:44.500 --> 00:03:47.500
    that's that's part of the teamwork approach here that you

    74
    00:03:47.500 --> 00:03:51.200
    know behind the scenes. I know that there's cfas working on our portfolios.

    75
    00:03:50.200 --> 00:03:53.100
    So so I think

    76
    00:03:53.100 --> 00:03:57.500
    you could see someone with another non-cfp designation

    77
    00:03:57.500 --> 00:04:00.200
    but is what's their firm like do they have a team behind

    78
    00:04:00.200 --> 00:04:04.100
    them is maybe they have a a young hire

    79
    00:04:03.100 --> 00:04:06.700
    a new hire coming out of college who's studying

    80
    00:04:06.700 --> 00:04:09.200
    for his or her cfp and that's their parent plan

    81
    00:04:09.200 --> 00:04:12.600
    who works on the financial plan. So I mean to I think

    82
    00:04:12.600 --> 00:04:15.300
    you might be doing a disservice just because

    83
    00:04:15.300 --> 00:04:18.400
    someone doesn't have cfp understand more about what's

    84
    00:04:18.400 --> 00:04:21.200
    what's going on at the firm and not just

    85
    00:04:21.200 --> 00:04:25.100
    the designation. But I do agree having a designation and you

    86
    00:04:24.100 --> 00:04:28.400
    made you reminded me. My continuing

    87
    00:04:27.400 --> 00:04:30.500
    ed is coming up and it's it's comprehensive. I've

    88
    00:04:30.500 --> 00:04:34.000
    got I've got a lot to do several hours to to

    89
    00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:34.100
    keep

    90
    00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:37.500
    Cfp designation current I've

    91
    00:04:37.500 --> 00:04:40.800
    got to do some continuing education requirements online. Yeah, me

    92
    00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:43.100
    too. Thanks for the reminder. I would say I didn't

    93
    00:04:43.100 --> 00:04:46.300
    mean to say that, you know, the cfp is definitely starting point. But Peter

    94
    00:04:46.300 --> 00:04:49.800
    brings up a great point that you when you visit with these cfps. They

    95
    00:04:49.800 --> 00:04:50.800
    do have those other.

    96
    00:04:51.600 --> 00:04:54.400
    People in their organizations that cover those parts

    97
    00:04:54.400 --> 00:04:57.200
    of the planning process for them from that standpoint

    98
    00:04:57.200 --> 00:05:00.200
    So and I've met many cfps that have their SEMA or have their CFA as

    99
    00:05:00.200 --> 00:05:03.400
    well. So depends on who I'm speaking with, but there's there's a

    100
    00:05:03.400 --> 00:05:06.400
    wide variety of different designations and some have won

    101
    00:05:06.400 --> 00:05:10.000
    some have many or some have, you know, more than one right? So something

    102
    00:05:09.200 --> 00:05:12.400
    that you would recommend investors look for as they're gonna

    103
    00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:15.200
    go through absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah Mike we

    104
    00:05:15.200 --> 00:05:18.100
    for all the cfps out there yet. We're definitely the top

    105
    00:05:18.100 --> 00:05:21.200
    designation. No doubt about no doubt about it. We can

    106
    00:05:21.200 --> 00:05:25.900
    leave it at that. Very good very good. So I

    107
    00:05:25.900 --> 00:05:28.500
    have a few more questions and this has been great gentlemen, but

    108
    00:05:29.700 --> 00:05:32.800
    What are some of the resources online resources

    109
    00:05:32.800 --> 00:05:35.400
    right, you know, I don't think people use phone books

    110
    00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:39.100
    anymore to find Financial professionals. What are

    111
    00:05:38.100 --> 00:05:41.100
    some of the things my gear you're working

    112
    00:05:41.100 --> 00:05:44.000
    with thousands of advisors. Like how do you how do you

    113
    00:05:44.100 --> 00:05:47.200
    go about and find an advisor that that you would want to work with

    114
    00:05:47.200 --> 00:05:50.600
    a professional level but not only professional of

    115
    00:05:50.600 --> 00:05:53.900
    us person maybe from even personal standpoint where can

    116
    00:05:53.900 --> 00:05:56.300
    investors go? Well they can they can you

    117
    00:05:56.300 --> 00:05:59.800
    know go online and you know, there's a couple of different organizations that

    118
    00:05:59.800 --> 00:06:02.700
    are out there that you could look at like the Financial Planning Association is

    119
    00:06:02.700 --> 00:06:05.600
    a great place to start that's that's a

    120
    00:06:05.600 --> 00:06:08.600
    big one National Association of

    121
    00:06:08.600 --> 00:06:11.800
    personal financial advisors is another great site

    122
    00:06:11.800 --> 00:06:14.600
    as well the certified financial planner

    123
    00:06:14.600 --> 00:06:17.100
    board. You can go that route as well. I mean,

    124
    00:06:17.100 --> 00:06:20.400
    that's probably the best place to start you can find someone in your general area

    125
    00:06:20.400 --> 00:06:23.100
    that could help you there. There's another firm out there

    126
    00:06:23.100 --> 00:06:26.600
    XY Planning Network which is which

    127
    00:06:26.600 --> 00:06:29.300
    is a pretty good tool for to search for fee only.

    128
    00:06:29.700 --> 00:06:32.200
    Financial advisors you mentioned, you know

    129
    00:06:32.200 --> 00:06:35.200
    word of mouth or referrals from from your friends

    130
    00:06:35.200 --> 00:06:38.200
    or family that may be working with a financial advisor. So all of

    131
    00:06:38.200 --> 00:06:41.100
    them are great great ways to to identify some of

    132
    00:06:41.100 --> 00:06:44.300
    that you might want to work with at least get the opportunity to interview them to see

    133
    00:06:44.300 --> 00:06:47.700
    if they would be a good fit for you. Yeah. I think there's a lot of great resources online,

    134
    00:06:47.700 --> 00:06:50.500
    you know, one of the things that Peter and

    135
    00:06:50.500 --> 00:06:53.500
    I talk about quite a bit is you know working with someone

    136
    00:06:53.500 --> 00:06:56.200
    who understands you someone who's working with

    137
    00:06:56.200 --> 00:06:58.600
    other investors like me.

    138
    00:06:59.300 --> 00:07:02.900
    Right in a lot of times if someone has a very specific need or

    139
    00:07:02.900 --> 00:07:05.500
    specific sort of outcome. They're

    140
    00:07:05.500 --> 00:07:08.800
    looking for they can identify the right Financial professional

    141
    00:07:08.800 --> 00:07:11.200
    by not only looking at those websites, but

    142
    00:07:12.200 --> 00:07:15.100
    LinkedIn Facebook. Look, who are these?

    143
    00:07:15.100 --> 00:07:18.300
    Look who at the who these advisors are look at

    144
    00:07:18.300 --> 00:07:21.500
    the circles that they're in right? You know it a funny story my parents

    145
    00:07:21.500 --> 00:07:24.200
    who are not great investors. They were

    146
    00:07:24.200 --> 00:07:27.400
    both School teachers had a pension but when they were looking for

    147
    00:07:27.400 --> 00:07:30.400
    financial advisor, they didn't look any

    148
    00:07:30.400 --> 00:07:33.700
    further than you know, the Connecticut Teachers Retirement Financial

    149
    00:07:33.700 --> 00:07:36.400
    advisory. It was a really long name like

    150
    00:07:36.400 --> 00:07:39.500
    that. I know I'm butchering it and talking it right but they will

    151
    00:07:39.500 --> 00:07:42.600
    work Connecticut Teachers that must be the guy that we work with without even

    152
    00:07:42.600 --> 00:07:45.800
    thinking twice about it, but they knew they felt comfortable and

    153
    00:07:45.800 --> 00:07:48.500
    they trusted that the this particular individuals working

    154
    00:07:48.500 --> 00:07:49.900
    with other, Connecticut Teachers.

    155
    00:07:50.800 --> 00:07:53.400
    Here to add to any of that Peter. I mean, I think that

    156
    00:07:53.400 --> 00:07:56.400
    you know, I've had done. Oh my

    157
    00:07:56.400 --> 00:07:57.600
    second cap. We have pulled that one back.

    158
    00:07:58.300 --> 00:07:59.300
    I won't ask that question better.

    159
    00:08:00.300 --> 00:08:00.300
    All right.

    160
    00:08:04.500 --> 00:08:05.500
    so Peter

    161
    00:08:06.900 --> 00:08:09.200
    You know, I've talked about this it it's a mutual

    162
    00:08:09.200 --> 00:08:12.400
    interview between an advisor and an investor the investors making

    163
    00:08:12.400 --> 00:08:16.000
    a choice, but the advisors making a choice as well. So talk

    164
    00:08:15.200 --> 00:08:17.800
    a little bit about that process if you will.

    165
    00:08:18.400 --> 00:08:21.700
    Yeah, I think that's that's a great question. And I definitely

    166
    00:08:21.700 --> 00:08:24.300
    encourage people to come up with a

    167
    00:08:24.300 --> 00:08:28.000
    list of questions and interview multiple

    168
    00:08:27.500 --> 00:08:30.200
    advisors definitely. But yeah, when when

    169
    00:08:30.200 --> 00:08:33.500
    I'm meeting with with a New Prospect, I'm interviewing

    170
    00:08:33.500 --> 00:08:36.700
    them as well. And there's things I'm I'm looking

    171
    00:08:36.700 --> 00:08:39.900
    for I want to make sure that number

    172
    00:08:39.900 --> 00:08:43.600
    one there. They're gonna be happy working with us. I've

    173
    00:08:42.600 --> 00:08:45.500
    told people who I refer to

    174
    00:08:45.500 --> 00:08:48.000
    them as Gunslingers. They want to pick stocks. They want to

    175
    00:08:48.100 --> 00:08:51.500
    be in and out of the market they want they want action and I've told

    176
    00:08:51.500 --> 00:08:54.800
    people I go I don't think we're gonna be a good fit. I'm a

    177
    00:08:54.800 --> 00:08:57.000
    nice person. You seem like a nice person you seem to get along but

    178
    00:08:57.800 --> 00:09:00.300
    we're going to have different philosophies and and I want

    179
    00:09:00.300 --> 00:09:03.200
    you to be happy and I don't want to waste your time and I

    180
    00:09:03.200 --> 00:09:06.200
    don't want to have my time wasted and so I've had to tell people I just don't think

    181
    00:09:06.200 --> 00:09:09.800
    that this is necessarily going to work. Um, also there's

    182
    00:09:09.800 --> 00:09:12.300
    when I start to hear people talk and I say this

    183
    00:09:12.300 --> 00:09:12.800
    to clients

    184
    00:09:13.500 --> 00:09:16.600
    and Prospects I start to get a gut feeling about what's

    185
    00:09:16.600 --> 00:09:19.400
    going on. And when I start to hear about things like

    186
    00:09:19.400 --> 00:09:22.300
    well a lot of debt, you know, you've got

    187
    00:09:22.300 --> 00:09:25.600
    and not good. You don't have good financial habits.

    188
    00:09:25.600 --> 00:09:28.300
    You're spending all your money. You've got

    189
    00:09:28.300 --> 00:09:31.200
    a lot of debt a lot of bad debt. It's one thing to have a mortgage your car

    190
    00:09:31.200 --> 00:09:34.100
    payments. Those are those are necessary. We'll call those

    191
    00:09:34.100 --> 00:09:38.200
    good debt necessary debt. We start talking about large student

    192
    00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:40.500
    loans. We start talking about large credit

    193
    00:09:40.500 --> 00:09:41.300
    card balances.

    194
    00:09:42.500 --> 00:09:45.900
    I may not be able to work with you. I you may be better off going

    195
    00:09:45.900 --> 00:09:49.600
    and having credit counseling done first because I

    196
    00:09:48.600 --> 00:09:52.000
    can maybe give you some pointers but I've

    197
    00:09:51.100 --> 00:09:54.400
    had to unfortunately tell people that we may

    198
    00:09:54.400 --> 00:09:57.600
    not be a good fit. There wasn't a whole lot I could do because they

    199
    00:09:57.600 --> 00:10:00.700
    just they just didn't have the assets. They needed to get really the

    200
    00:10:00.700 --> 00:10:03.400
    basics of their budgeting or spending plan

    201
    00:10:03.400 --> 00:10:06.600
    down and start to work on that debt. And that's not something we're

    202
    00:10:06.600 --> 00:10:07.000
    necessarily.

    203
    00:10:08.500 --> 00:10:11.600
    Working on it'd be more of sort of a credit agency

    204
    00:10:11.600 --> 00:10:14.600
    helping them to kind of get that square away. Absolutely. You

    205
    00:10:14.600 --> 00:10:17.500
    mentioned working with, you know, other sort of

    206
    00:10:17.500 --> 00:10:20.200
    financial professionals that you you work with

    207
    00:10:20.200 --> 00:10:20.400
    other.

    208
    00:10:21.500 --> 00:10:25.400
    Financial professionals as well. I mean maybe not direct financial

    209
    00:10:25.400 --> 00:10:28.400
    advisors, but tax advisors and things like that. Oh, definitely.

    210
    00:10:28.400 --> 00:10:31.400
    I like to say that the analogy is I'm

    211
    00:10:31.400 --> 00:10:34.600
    I'm sort of the quarterback or I'm your

    212
    00:10:34.600 --> 00:10:37.700
    your primary care physician if we need to bring in a specialist,

    213
    00:10:37.700 --> 00:10:40.300
    you know cardiologists so forth

    214
    00:10:40.300 --> 00:10:41.900
    weekologists.

    215
    00:10:44.400 --> 00:10:46.100
    So but I'm working with.

    216
    00:10:47.200 --> 00:10:50.300
    I'll work with the client's attorney to talk about their state plan

    217
    00:10:50.300 --> 00:10:54.500
    work with a client's accountant or CPA to

    218
    00:10:54.500 --> 00:10:57.500
    talk about if we need to do some rebalancing in the portfolio before

    219
    00:10:57.500 --> 00:10:59.200
    I do any of that.

    220
    00:11:00.200 --> 00:11:04.000
    And start triggering capital gains. I want to make sure that the accountant is

    221
    00:11:03.400 --> 00:11:06.400
    on board with it and we understand what the

    222
    00:11:06.400 --> 00:11:09.500
    ramifications are of those actions or in

    223
    00:11:09.500 --> 00:11:12.800
    actions because the last thing a client wants is a

    224
    00:11:12.800 --> 00:11:15.800
    surprise attack time. There's something psychological about

    225
    00:11:15.800 --> 00:11:18.700
    a big tax bill staring you in the face and it's

    226
    00:11:18.700 --> 00:11:21.100
    one thing to not know about it and have to

    227
    00:11:21.100 --> 00:11:24.200
    pay it. It's another thing. All right, you know what we knew about this, but we know why we

    228
    00:11:24.200 --> 00:11:27.300
    did it. So I'm constantly working with

    229
    00:11:27.300 --> 00:11:30.900
    with other Professionals in helping clients

    230
    00:11:30.900 --> 00:11:32.800
    with taxes and in legal issues.

    231
    00:11:33.700 --> 00:11:36.300
    That's fantastic. Yeah, so that's another thing that investors should

    232
    00:11:36.300 --> 00:11:39.100
    be looking for. Is there a true team approach? Maybe not even under the

    233
    00:11:39.100 --> 00:11:42.700
    same roof under the same corporate umbrella if you will but making

    234
    00:11:42.700 --> 00:11:46.100
    sure that the advisors acting in that quarterback capacity

    235
    00:11:45.100 --> 00:11:48.700
    and has the right Specialists for

    236
    00:11:48.700 --> 00:11:51.200
    those needs that might be outside of the scope of

    237
    00:11:51.200 --> 00:11:54.700
    what the advisors doing on a day-to-day and that could be another point

    238
    00:11:54.700 --> 00:11:57.300
    of reference for a client. If you have an accountant who

    239
    00:11:57.300 --> 00:12:00.400
    you've been working with for a long time and you happen to like him

    240
    00:12:00.400 --> 00:12:03.800
    or her in the way that they work maybe they could be a place

    241
    00:12:03.800 --> 00:12:05.100
    where you could go to get a referral.

    242
    00:12:05.900 --> 00:12:08.800
    Because I'm in all likelihood that that CPA

    243
    00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:11.600
    or that attorney is has some

    244
    00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:14.400
    type of relationship with a financial advisor and could give

    245
    00:12:14.400 --> 00:12:17.100
    you a couple of places to go. Yeah, I think that's a great

    246
    00:12:17.100 --> 00:12:20.200
    great piece of advice there. All right.

    247
    00:12:20.200 --> 00:12:23.300
    I want one more topic here because this comes up a

    248
    00:12:23.300 --> 00:12:26.800
    lot and it's the notion of compensation for financial advisors.

    249
    00:12:26.800 --> 00:12:29.700
    I've heard individuals say

    250
    00:12:29.700 --> 00:12:32.200
    that I don't pay my financial advisor or anything. He does

    251
    00:12:32.200 --> 00:12:35.100
    it for free sure right there is

    252
    00:12:35.100 --> 00:12:38.200
    there's a problem this industry, I think with transparency at times and

    253
    00:12:38.200 --> 00:12:41.500
    there's a number of different ways financial advisors are

    254
    00:12:41.500 --> 00:12:44.100
    being compensated. I didn't like frankly I think advisors should

    255
    00:12:44.100 --> 00:12:47.300
    be fairly compensated. They're doing really good work, right?

    256
    00:12:49.100 --> 00:12:52.300
    Depending on the advisor. Of course, Mike tell us

    257
    00:12:52.300 --> 00:12:54.500
    a little bit about the couple of different.

    258
    00:12:55.300 --> 00:12:59.000
    Fee structures or compensation structures there are for financial advisors.

    259
    00:12:58.600 --> 00:13:01.800
    And if there's one that you would recommend over

    260
    00:13:01.800 --> 00:13:04.300
    another I'll rattle them off because it's a

    261
    00:13:04.300 --> 00:13:07.100
    lot of different ones. There's feel only which we've talked a little

    262
    00:13:07.100 --> 00:13:09.400
    bit about there's fee-based. There's Commission

    263
    00:13:10.100 --> 00:13:10.900
    There's retainer.

    264
    00:13:11.800 --> 00:13:14.900
    There's subscription. There's

    265
    00:13:14.900 --> 00:13:17.400
    another one I've heard that I know is out there not as

    266
    00:13:17.400 --> 00:13:20.600
    popular but it's there and there's flat fee.

    267
    00:13:20.600 --> 00:13:23.600
    So there's a number of different ways that advisors are

    268
    00:13:23.600 --> 00:13:26.700
    compensated and the one

    269
    00:13:26.700 --> 00:13:29.300
    of course in my line of work and in terms

    270
    00:13:29.300 --> 00:13:32.400
    of what I do on a daily basis working with us, I come across primarily

    271
    00:13:32.400 --> 00:13:35.100
    not always I would say fee only

    272
    00:13:35.100 --> 00:13:38.100
    in fee based or the two that that primarily I work with

    273
    00:13:38.100 --> 00:13:41.300
    although there are there are others that are

    274
    00:13:41.300 --> 00:13:44.100
    less. So like a retainer I've seen I've come across that

    275
    00:13:44.100 --> 00:13:47.400
    but I say primarily it's fee only and fee-based that

    276
    00:13:47.400 --> 00:13:50.000
    I typically work with advisors and you know,

    277
    00:13:50.300 --> 00:13:53.100
    I'll let Peter elaborate but I'll just say generally that fee only would be

    278
    00:13:53.100 --> 00:13:56.100
    just be be charging, you know,

    279
    00:13:56.100 --> 00:13:59.300
    a fee for services. It could

    280
    00:13:59.300 --> 00:14:02.100
    be it could be a flat fee or could be a fee based

    281
    00:14:02.100 --> 00:14:05.400
    on assets under management that the investor might have with that advisor

    282
    00:14:05.400 --> 00:14:08.000
    fee base is is kind of

    283
    00:14:08.300 --> 00:14:11.600
    a combination of the only and commission if you will it has

    284
    00:14:12.100 --> 00:14:16.600
    The concept of building on assets but also the advisor

    285
    00:14:15.600 --> 00:14:19.300
    has the ability to offer commission-based

    286
    00:14:18.300 --> 00:14:22.300
    products that would follow outside of the fiduciary scope.

    287
    00:14:21.300 --> 00:14:24.800
    I believe Peter and so those are the two that primarily

    288
    00:14:24.800 --> 00:14:27.500
    I see in my kind of interactions with

    289
    00:14:27.500 --> 00:14:30.400
    advisors around the country. Yeah, I think most of our listeners are

    290
    00:14:30.400 --> 00:14:33.800
    probably falling into the fee only fee-based camp

    291
    00:14:33.800 --> 00:14:36.500
    or the commission side right there. There

    292
    00:14:36.500 --> 00:14:39.600
    are a number of different fee models out there in compensation models

    293
    00:14:39.600 --> 00:14:42.800
    and I think they all have their pros and cons but you

    294
    00:14:42.800 --> 00:14:45.100
    just said something that I'm gonna ask Peter O'Brien on

    295
    00:14:45.100 --> 00:14:45.300
    right?

    296
    00:14:46.100 --> 00:14:47.600
    We talked about fiduciary.

    297
    00:14:48.500 --> 00:14:50.800
    If you are paying a commission.

    298
    00:14:51.900 --> 00:14:55.200
    Is your advisor acting as a fiduciary necessarily? Yeah,

    299
    00:14:54.200 --> 00:14:57.500
    if you've your your fee only your

    300
    00:14:57.500 --> 00:15:00.200
    being charged in a fee for your advice and

    301
    00:15:00.200 --> 00:15:04.700
    and whatever the the Investments would be. Where's fee-based

    302
    00:15:03.700 --> 00:15:06.400
    you could be receiving commissions.

    303
    00:15:07.400 --> 00:15:10.100
    On investment products. It's sort of

    304
    00:15:10.100 --> 00:15:15.800
    I guess I'll use the term hybrid approach. So it's

    305
    00:15:14.800 --> 00:15:17.800
    a gray area. They I don't

    306
    00:15:17.800 --> 00:15:20.100
    know if because we don't do that here, you know,

    307
    00:15:20.100 --> 00:15:23.600
    we don't have commission based investment products. It's strictly

    308
    00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:26.300
    putting people into no load low cost

    309
    00:15:26.300 --> 00:15:29.100
    mutual funds and ETFs and we are being

    310
    00:15:29.100 --> 00:15:32.300
    paid a fee based upon those assets under management. We don't

    311
    00:15:32.300 --> 00:15:35.500
    have commissionable investment products to sell and if

    312
    00:15:35.500 --> 00:15:38.100
    you're if an advisor is doing that.

    313
    00:15:39.300 --> 00:15:42.200
    I don't think they can put themselves out there as

    314
    00:15:42.200 --> 00:15:43.700
    as a fiduciary necessarily.

    315
    00:15:44.500 --> 00:15:47.800
    Yeah, I think that the commission side I'm not

    316
    00:15:47.800 --> 00:15:50.500
    knocking it. Just calling it

    317
    00:15:50.500 --> 00:15:53.100
    what it is. It's it's rot with conflicts of interest and

    318
    00:15:53.100 --> 00:15:56.500
    you just said something that I think would would mean

    319
    00:15:56.500 --> 00:15:57.500
    a lot to our listeners, right?

    320
    00:15:58.500 --> 00:15:58.800
    these

    321
    00:16:00.600 --> 00:16:03.600
    percentage of assets fees paying fees you're paying

    322
    00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:06.200
    for advice in that fee stays the

    323
    00:16:06.200 --> 00:16:09.900
    same regardless of the investment product. It's a

    324
    00:16:09.900 --> 00:16:12.500
    with your charging 1% regardless of

    325
    00:16:12.500 --> 00:16:15.400
    the advice you give you earn five you earn that one percent rather.

    326
    00:16:16.100 --> 00:16:16.900
    commissions

    327
    00:16:17.800 --> 00:16:20.700
    Is in compensation for advice it's compensation

    328
    00:16:20.700 --> 00:16:23.300
    for selling a product and that product

    329
    00:16:23.300 --> 00:16:26.100
    has to be suitable not necessarily best interest.

    330
    00:16:27.700 --> 00:16:30.500
    Okay, so that I think that's something that people

    331
    00:16:30.500 --> 00:16:34.000
    don't understand outside of this industry. You

    332
    00:16:33.400 --> 00:16:36.300
    know, there's two ways two major ways

    333
    00:16:36.300 --> 00:16:39.200
    that advisers get compensated fees versus commissions and

    334
    00:16:39.200 --> 00:16:42.500
    one other point that I'll make about fees and correct

    335
    00:16:42.500 --> 00:16:45.400
    me if I'm wrong gentlemen if you're charging fees on assets.

    336
    00:16:46.300 --> 00:16:49.600
    If the asset level goes up the advisor

    337
    00:16:49.600 --> 00:16:52.900
    gets paid more the asset level goes down. I

    338
    00:16:52.900 --> 00:16:55.800
    mean the percentage stays the same but the actual dollars change, so

    339
    00:16:55.800 --> 00:16:58.500
    I think that it actually aligns the interests.

    340
    00:16:59.400 --> 00:17:02.500
    Of the investor and the advisor using a fee model

    341
    00:17:02.500 --> 00:17:05.400
    for Susan commission model where someone might

    342
    00:17:05.400 --> 00:17:08.600
    be asking you to buy a product that you may not necessarily

    343
    00:17:08.600 --> 00:17:08.900
    need.

    344
    00:17:10.500 --> 00:17:13.800
    Correct. And that's that's the thing. We you

    345
    00:17:13.800 --> 00:17:14.800
    start talking about different.

    346
    00:17:16.100 --> 00:17:19.700
    Whether it's Insurance products investment products that have commissions on

    347
    00:17:19.700 --> 00:17:20.000
    them.

    348
    00:17:20.700 --> 00:17:23.500
    Now all of a sudden it could be suitable. But if product

    349
    00:17:23.500 --> 00:17:24.600
    a May pay

    350
    00:17:25.300 --> 00:17:28.900
    X percentage products B may pay X

    351
    00:17:28.900 --> 00:17:31.100
    percentage plus something on top of

    352
    00:17:31.100 --> 00:17:31.300
    it.

    353
    00:17:32.700 --> 00:17:35.400
    A non-fiduciary advisor is probably

    354
    00:17:35.400 --> 00:17:38.400
    going to go to product B because it's going to pay him

    355
    00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:41.000
    or her more and it's a perceived conflict of

    356
    00:17:41.400 --> 00:17:44.300
    interest. I'm not saying that every person out there who's earning a commission is

    357
    00:17:45.100 --> 00:17:48.500
    Is not acting in good faith, but there

    358
    00:17:48.500 --> 00:17:51.600
    is there's a potential for that conflict to be there. Sure. It's

    359
    00:17:51.600 --> 00:17:54.900
    it's all things being equal right? It's they're gonna pick if it's

    360
    00:17:54.900 --> 00:17:57.500
    if it doesn't necessarily hurt the

    361
    00:17:57.500 --> 00:18:00.500
    client and all and the Investments are relatively the

    362
    00:18:00.500 --> 00:18:04.100
    same they're going to gravitate probably towards the higher commission product.

    363
    00:18:03.100 --> 00:18:06.400
    Not that it's a bad thing. But that's the conflict of

    364
    00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:09.000
    interest that we talk about right isn't necessarily in the best

    365
    00:18:09.300 --> 00:18:12.600
    interest of the client. Yeah, and I think investors don't need products as

    366
    00:18:12.600 --> 00:18:15.600
    much as they need advice. Yeah agreed. I totally agree.

    367
    00:18:15.600 --> 00:18:18.700
    We were talking the the other

    368
    00:18:18.700 --> 00:18:21.800
    day just that the the meetings we were we were at and

    369
    00:18:21.800 --> 00:18:24.300
    and the model the way it was is you

    370
    00:18:24.300 --> 00:18:27.700
    had insurance companies or investment firms sort of

    371
    00:18:27.700 --> 00:18:30.900
    sitting at the top designing product and starting

    372
    00:18:30.900 --> 00:18:33.400
    to push that product down to advisors who would

    373
    00:18:33.400 --> 00:18:36.300
    then push it to clients down at the bottom and really our

    374
    00:18:36.300 --> 00:18:37.800
    model is where we flip the script.

    375
    00:18:38.600 --> 00:18:41.600
    The client is at the top and the client comes to the advisor.

    376
    00:18:42.200 --> 00:18:45.400
    And we then go out to the product manufacturers to

    377
    00:18:45.400 --> 00:18:48.400
    find the the best product the best solution for

    378
    00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:51.000
    for the client to make as part of

    379
    00:18:51.500 --> 00:18:54.300
    their financial plan. So I think that's that's a big difference there.

    380
    00:18:54.300 --> 00:18:57.600
    We have nothing proprietary and we are acting in the best interests

    381
    00:18:57.600 --> 00:19:00.500
    of the client looking for a best of breed approach. And

    382
    00:19:00.500 --> 00:19:03.600
    again, usually it comes down to well, what

    383
    00:19:03.600 --> 00:19:06.100
    are the fees associated with that and that's another great piece of

    384
    00:19:06.100 --> 00:19:07.000
    advice for clients.

    385
    00:19:08.400 --> 00:19:11.300
    Understand who you're paying and what you're paying

    386
    00:19:11.300 --> 00:19:12.100
    them and what for?

    387
    00:19:12.900 --> 00:19:16.000
    Whether it's mutual funds inside your 401k or

    388
    00:19:15.400 --> 00:19:18.800
    something inside if you have an IRA through your bank

    389
    00:19:18.800 --> 00:19:21.500
    understand what it what it is and and

    390
    00:19:21.500 --> 00:19:24.500
    how it works. You're the one paying it and and understand how

    391
    00:19:24.500 --> 00:19:27.400
    all of that works and a lot of times people don't realize

    392
    00:19:27.400 --> 00:19:30.500
    that because a lot of times things are are not

    393
    00:19:30.500 --> 00:19:33.300
    apparent you got to do a got to do a little bit of digging to understand

    394
    00:19:33.300 --> 00:19:36.500
    what those those fees are inside of certain products.

    395
    00:19:36.500 --> 00:19:39.300
    Yeah. Absolutely. No, no what you're paying and I think

    396
    00:19:39.300 --> 00:19:42.200
    that there are some compensation models for

    397
    00:19:42.200 --> 00:19:45.700
    advisor out that they're a little bit opaque if

    398
    00:19:45.700 --> 00:19:48.600
    you will but as an investor

    399
    00:19:48.600 --> 00:19:51.600
    working with the financial professional transparency matters,

    400
    00:19:51.600 --> 00:19:54.200
    and if someone's not being transparent, then there's

    401
    00:19:54.200 --> 00:19:57.000
    probably not a lot of trust there in this business is built on trust.

    402
    00:19:58.100 --> 00:20:01.300
    So yeah, I have to disclose everything to everybody up

    403
    00:20:01.300 --> 00:20:01.700
    front because

    404
    00:20:03.300 --> 00:20:06.300
    It's coming out. It's coming out of the account and they'll see it right on the statement as

    405
    00:20:06.300 --> 00:20:09.600
    a line item to the penny. Yeah, exactly, except a

    406
    00:20:09.600 --> 00:20:09.700
    penny.

    407
    00:20:10.200 --> 00:20:13.700
    Absolutely. Well gentlemen, thank you so much for your time. So I

    408
    00:20:13.700 --> 00:20:16.400
    just want to kind of recap because there was so much great information

    409
    00:20:16.400 --> 00:20:19.500
    that the two of you shared if you're an investor

    410
    00:20:19.500 --> 00:20:22.300
    out there if you're one of our listeners and you're looking to work with a financial

    411
    00:20:22.300 --> 00:20:25.500
    professional or if you're looking for maybe a second opinion a couple

    412
    00:20:25.500 --> 00:20:28.100
    of things that that Peter and Michael had talked to us

    413
    00:20:28.100 --> 00:20:31.400
    about today. Make sure you ask the question. Are you acting

    414
    00:20:31.400 --> 00:20:34.600
    in a fiduciary capacity? Probably the most important question to

    415
    00:20:34.600 --> 00:20:35.700
    ask a financial professional.

    416
    00:20:36.300 --> 00:20:40.100
    Number two. What is your financial planning process? Right

    417
    00:20:39.100 --> 00:20:42.200
    the value proposition of a

    418
    00:20:42.200 --> 00:20:46.200
    financial advisor should be based on that planning process. And

    419
    00:20:45.200 --> 00:20:48.500
    since you are paying for advice, I think a great

    420
    00:20:48.500 --> 00:20:51.300
    question is what is your investment philosophy? How do you see the

    421
    00:20:51.300 --> 00:20:54.400
    world work? How are you going to advise me based on that investment

    422
    00:20:54.400 --> 00:20:55.200
    philosophy

    423
    00:20:55.900 --> 00:20:58.300
    When it comes to credentials, I think looking for any credential

    424
    00:20:58.300 --> 00:21:01.100
    makes a lot of sense after a person's name. But if you're

    425
    00:21:01.100 --> 00:21:04.100
    looking for a true financial planner, the cfp designation is the

    426
    00:21:04.100 --> 00:21:05.900
    one that that our guests recommend.

    427
    00:21:06.600 --> 00:21:09.400
    Look for people that work with people like

    428
    00:21:09.400 --> 00:21:12.600
    you look for advisors that are working with people like yourself

    429
    00:21:12.600 --> 00:21:15.900
    and there's a lot of resources out there. Mike mentioned

    430
    00:21:15.900 --> 00:21:18.600
    Napa. There's the advisor's website. Of

    431
    00:21:18.600 --> 00:21:21.300
    course Facebook LinkedIn are great ways to look at how

    432
    00:21:21.300 --> 00:21:24.200
    these advisors are working with

    433
    00:21:24.200 --> 00:21:28.200
    people that may or may not be like you and let me throw another resource

    434
    00:21:27.200 --> 00:21:31.200
    out there. A lot of investors don't realize that you

    435
    00:21:30.200 --> 00:21:34.300
    can Google broker check broker check

    436
    00:21:34.300 --> 00:21:38.000
    is a government website where tracks the history

    437
    00:21:37.100 --> 00:21:41.000
    of every single Financial professional whether they're SEC

    438
    00:21:40.600 --> 00:21:43.900
    registered or member of finra and you'll

    439
    00:21:43.900 --> 00:21:46.400
    see if there's any disclosures or anything like that

    440
    00:21:46.400 --> 00:21:49.400
    so broker checks are great way to see if

    441
    00:21:49.400 --> 00:21:52.200
    if there's any dings on the record of

    442
    00:21:52.200 --> 00:21:55.100
    the person that you're speaking to and then in terms

    443
    00:21:55.100 --> 00:21:58.700
    of compensation look for fees versus commissions not

    444
    00:21:58.700 --> 00:22:01.200
    to say that commissions are necessarily bad, but they

    445
    00:22:01.200 --> 00:22:04.100
    there could be some conflicts of

    446
    00:22:04.100 --> 00:22:06.500
    interest in there and a fee-based advisor.

    447
    00:22:06.600 --> 00:22:09.200
    Even a fee only advisor is going to sit in the same side of

    448
    00:22:09.200 --> 00:22:12.700
    the table as you the investor. So Michael, thank

    449
    00:22:12.700 --> 00:22:15.200
    you so much for your time. Thanks Tom Peter. So thank you

    450
    00:22:15.200 --> 00:22:19.100
    for joining us here today. This has been a great conversation and so

    451
    00:22:18.100 --> 00:22:21.300
    for our listeners out there. Thank you for joining us.

    452
    00:22:21.300 --> 00:22:24.200
    We'll get you on the next one. And if you

    453
    00:22:24.200 --> 00:22:28.400
    want to look at any of our previous unfiltered Finance podcasts, they're

    454
    00:22:27.400 --> 00:22:30.600
    available wherever you might be getting your podcast today.

    455
    00:22:30.600 --> 00:22:34.200
    So thank you till next time. Bye Cemetery Partners.

    456
    00:22:33.200 --> 00:22:36.600
    LLC is an investment advisor

    457
    00:22:36.600 --> 00:22:39.300
    firm registered with the Security and Exchange Commission

    458
    00:22:39.300 --> 00:22:42.500
    The Firm only transacts business in states where

    459
    00:22:42.500 --> 00:22:45.600
    it is properly registered or excluded or

    460
    00:22:45.600 --> 00:22:49.200
    Exempted from registration requirements registration of

    461
    00:22:48.200 --> 00:22:51.400
    an investment advisor does not imply

    462
    00:22:51.400 --> 00:22:54.500
    any specific level of skill or training and does

    463
    00:22:54.500 --> 00:22:57.300
    not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the

    464
    00:22:57.300 --> 00:23:00.300
    commission. No one should assume that future performance of any

    465
    00:23:00.300 --> 00:23:04.400
    specific investment investment strategy product or

    466
    00:23:03.400 --> 00:23:06.100
    non-investment related content.

    467
    00:23:06.600 --> 00:23:10.000
    Reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be

    468
    00:23:09.000 --> 00:23:10.500
    profitable.

    469
    00:23:11.400 --> 00:23:14.300
    As with any investment strategy there is the possibility

    470
    00:23:14.300 --> 00:23:17.500
    of profitability as well as loss due

    471
    00:23:17.500 --> 00:23:20.200
    to various factors including changing market

    472
    00:23:20.200 --> 00:23:22.600
    conditions and/or applicable laws.

    473
    00:23:23.400 --> 00:23:27.000
    Content may not be reflective of current opinions or

    474
    00:23:26.600 --> 00:23:29.600
    positions. Please note the material

    475
    00:23:29.600 --> 00:23:32.300
    is provided for educational and background use only

    476
    00:23:32.300 --> 00:23:36.000
    moreover. You should not assume that any discussion or information

    477
    00:23:35.700 --> 00:23:38.600
    contained in this material serves as

    478
    00:23:38.600 --> 00:23:42.400
    the receipt of or as a substitute for personalized

    479
    00:23:41.400 --> 00:23:43.700
    investment advice.

  • As financial professionals, we’re often asked one simple question: “do you know what I should buy right now?” In truth, we don’t believe it’s possible to successfully predict market behaviors most of the time. But, we do believe that a qualified financial advisor can help you devise a plan for long-term success. In this episode of Unfiltered Finance, our own Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships and Product Development, is joined by Symmetry’s Michael Storer, Senior Regional Director, and a financial advisor from our sister firm, Apella Wealth, Peter Leppones, CFP®, to answer a more important question: “what should you consider when choosing a financial advisor?”

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions. Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice. Transcript:

    00:00:01.900 --> 00:00:07.400
    Hello and

    1
    00:00:07.400 --> 00:00:10.700
    welcome to unfiltered Finance. I'm your host Tom romano.

    2
    00:00:10.700 --> 00:00:13.300
    And thank you for joining us this episode today. We

    3
    00:00:13.300 --> 00:00:17.000
    are talking about choosing the right financial advisor and

    4
    00:00:16.200 --> 00:00:19.400
    I have the perfect guests for this topic

    5
    00:00:19.400 --> 00:00:22.300
    joining us here today first and foremost Mike

    6
    00:00:22.300 --> 00:00:25.600
    store who is a senior Regional director

    7
    00:00:25.600 --> 00:00:28.100
    at symmetry Partners. I asked Mike to be

    8
    00:00:28.100 --> 00:00:31.700
    on the podcast because he works with thousands of financial advisors across

    9
    00:00:31.700 --> 00:00:34.200
    the country. He knows which ones

    10
    00:00:34.200 --> 00:00:37.200
    are doing the appropriate job and due diligence and

    11
    00:00:37.200 --> 00:00:41.200
    planning for their clients and the others who might be dare. I

    12
    00:00:41.200 --> 00:00:44.500
    say fake it Mike faking it and of

    13
    00:00:44.500 --> 00:00:47.800
    course a long time friend of mine Mr. Peter loponis

    14
    00:00:47.800 --> 00:00:50.900
    who's a certified financial planner and financial advisor

    15
    00:00:50.900 --> 00:00:53.100
    with Apollo wealth and happens to be

    16
    00:00:53.100 --> 00:00:56.200
    my personal financial planner. So gentlemen, thank you both for joining

    17
    00:00:56.200 --> 00:00:59.600
    us here today. You're welcome, Tom. Thanks Tom. Great to be here. I thought

    18
    00:00:59.600 --> 00:01:01.600
    this was appropriate topic for us to discuss.

    19
    00:01:01.900 --> 00:01:04.500
    you know coming out of the pandemic I travel a

    20
    00:01:04.500 --> 00:01:07.400
    lot for business and I've been on many planes

    21
    00:01:07.400 --> 00:01:10.400
    over the last few months and you know, whether it's an

    22
    00:01:10.400 --> 00:01:11.100
    airport or

    23
    00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:16.200
    Are sitting next to someone on a plane and just bring

    24
    00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:19.000
    up some small talk and people understand

    25
    00:01:18.300 --> 00:01:21.300
    that I'm working in the financial services a business.

    26
    00:01:21.300 --> 00:01:25.000
    And the first question. I always get is got any

    27
    00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:27.300
    tips. What should I be buying? What

    28
    00:01:27.300 --> 00:01:31.000
    should I be selling? Right? It's a very common question and for

    29
    00:01:30.300 --> 00:01:33.100
    years, my response has always been and I'm

    30
    00:01:33.100 --> 00:01:36.400
    a firm believer of this is the best advice I can give anyone in

    31
    00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:39.300
    that moment is to work with

    32
    00:01:39.300 --> 00:01:42.300
    someone you trust financial planner financial

    33
    00:01:42.300 --> 00:01:46.300
    advisor that's working in a fiduciary capacity. I

    34
    00:01:45.300 --> 00:01:48.300
    have a number of reasons why I say that but

    35
    00:01:48.300 --> 00:01:51.700
    Mike I'd love to hear it from your perspective. Why should

    36
    00:01:51.700 --> 00:01:54.300
    investors people planning for

    37
    00:01:54.300 --> 00:01:57.300
    retirement or for any other Financial need be working

    38
    00:01:57.300 --> 00:02:00.100
    with a financial professional? That's a great question.

    39
    00:02:00.100 --> 00:02:03.100
    I think you hit on it at the in your opening

    40
    00:02:03.100 --> 00:02:04.100
    remarks Tom is that

    41
    00:02:04.900 --> 00:02:05.200
    You know.

    42
    00:02:06.300 --> 00:02:09.300
    Having traveled the country for many

    43
    00:02:09.300 --> 00:02:14.300
    years working with a number of different types of advisors and meeting

    44
    00:02:13.300 --> 00:02:16.900
    with clients at the same time, you know clients have

    45
    00:02:16.900 --> 00:02:19.200
    different desperate needs in terms of when it

    46
    00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:22.100
    comes to financial Financial advice so they can

    47
    00:02:22.100 --> 00:02:25.100
    certainly learn about it on on a website if they

    48
    00:02:25.100 --> 00:02:28.500
    want to but I found that especially the

    49
    00:02:28.500 --> 00:02:31.900
    best advisors are working working with

    50
    00:02:31.900 --> 00:02:34.400
    clients and from that

    51
    00:02:34.400 --> 00:02:36.300
    perspective. I know who these advisors are.

    52
    00:02:37.300 --> 00:02:40.500
    And I know they're doing a great job for their clients. And for me,

    53
    00:02:40.500 --> 00:02:43.400
    the one thing that comes to mind besides everything

    54
    00:02:43.400 --> 00:02:46.100
    else at a financial advisor does because I think about it in

    55
    00:02:46.100 --> 00:02:49.600
    my own world is comfort and peace of mind, right? There's lots

    56
    00:02:49.600 --> 00:02:51.400
    of different moving Parts when it comes to planning.

    57
    00:02:52.200 --> 00:02:55.500
    And and what you're going to do with your money for the long term and even myself

    58
    00:02:55.500 --> 00:02:58.200
    being in this business, I worry about am I making

    59
    00:02:58.200 --> 00:03:01.900
    the right decisions? So I think a lot of it comes down

    60
    00:03:01.900 --> 00:03:05.400
    to peace of mind and comfort. I think that that's high

    61
    00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:07.300
    level. There's a lot of you can drill down from there

    62
    00:03:07.300 --> 00:03:10.900
    but I think for most clients if you think about it, it's getting that

    63
    00:03:10.900 --> 00:03:13.400
    pressure off of you and bringing a

    64
    00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:16.500
    professional and to make sure that you're meeting your life goals, whatever those might

    65
    00:03:16.500 --> 00:03:19.400
    be sure. No, absolutely. I think what I'm hearing you say, I

    66
    00:03:19.400 --> 00:03:23.100
    hear things like planning and long-term and Peter

    67
    00:03:22.100 --> 00:03:25.700
    I'll shift over to you. So

    68
    00:03:25.700 --> 00:03:28.400
    what I'm hearing Mike say and I loved for you to plan

    69
    00:03:28.400 --> 00:03:31.400
    on this when someone asks me got any tips,

    70
    00:03:31.400 --> 00:03:32.700
    why is that the wrong question?

    71
    00:03:34.600 --> 00:03:35.200
    well, I think

    72
    00:03:36.700 --> 00:03:39.500
    the answer they're looking for everyone wants something

    73
    00:03:39.500 --> 00:03:42.600
    that's exciting and and sexy that

    74
    00:03:42.600 --> 00:03:43.200
    they can tell.

    75
    00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:47.500
    Their friends. I think you've used the term water cooler alpha or

    76
    00:03:47.500 --> 00:03:50.900
    Golf Course Alpha everyone thinks somehow because we're

    77
    00:03:50.900 --> 00:03:53.600
    sitting here on the inside. We're insiders. We've

    78
    00:03:53.600 --> 00:03:56.600
    got more information than than they do

    79
    00:03:56.600 --> 00:03:59.300
    as as retail investors, but

    80
    00:03:59.300 --> 00:04:02.600
    that's just not the case and and it's not about

    81
    00:04:02.600 --> 00:04:05.200
    hitting that home run with the stock because

    82
    00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:08.500
    if you're gonna be picking individual stocks, there's gonna

    83
    00:04:08.500 --> 00:04:11.300
    be some home runs in there, but there's got to be some singles and

    84
    00:04:11.300 --> 00:04:14.500
    doubles there's gonna be some losers too. It just

    85
    00:04:14.500 --> 00:04:18.000
    it's gonna happen statistically, but when

    86
    00:04:17.100 --> 00:04:20.600
    we talk about a plan and what

    87
    00:04:20.600 --> 00:04:23.700
    it can do for you long term the sense of confidence

    88
    00:04:23.700 --> 00:04:26.300
    that it's going to give you. That's what you really need. Hey, it's

    89
    00:04:26.300 --> 00:04:29.300
    great to be able to say Jesus I bought in at this stock when when it

    90
    00:04:29.300 --> 00:04:32.500
    was at 10 and it went to a hundred and in two years. It's a

    91
    00:04:32.500 --> 00:04:33.700
    great story, but

    92
    00:04:35.200 --> 00:04:38.500
    Is better to have a sense of confidence and comfort with your

    93
    00:04:38.500 --> 00:04:41.200
    plan and with your financial outcomes, and that's why

    94
    00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:44.500
    sitting down and taking the time to go through a plan with a

    95
    00:04:44.500 --> 00:04:47.100
    cfp with someone who's a fiduciary is really in your

    96
    00:04:47.100 --> 00:04:50.400
    best interest versus getting that that hot stock tip.

    97
    00:04:50.400 --> 00:04:53.100
    Yeah, I would agree. The one thing that

    98
    00:04:53.100 --> 00:04:56.200
    I always comes to mind when someone says got any tips the first

    99
    00:04:56.200 --> 00:04:59.700
    thing I'm thinking well if I had some I wouldn't tell you I'd keep

    100
    00:04:59.700 --> 00:05:02.300
    it all for myself, right? There's wildly more Capital

    101
    00:05:02.300 --> 00:05:06.600
    to be to be earned when you keep those secrets to yourself right quick

    102
    00:05:05.600 --> 00:05:08.100
    short story. Tom and

    103
    00:05:08.100 --> 00:05:11.400
    Peter. My son is out in gainfully employed

    104
    00:05:11.400 --> 00:05:14.600
    in the Working World now and he has a little bit of money and he

    105
    00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:17.700
    asked me about a year ago a year and a half ago to Dad what

    106
    00:05:17.700 --> 00:05:20.700
    stocks should I pick? And so I immediately opened

    107
    00:05:20.700 --> 00:05:24.300
    up the Barron's journal and

    108
    00:05:24.300 --> 00:05:27.200
    I just looked at the stocks to pick now I said, hey, you

    109
    00:05:27.200 --> 00:05:30.100
    know, if you want to buy some technology, here's a bunch of Technology names. I said,

    110
    00:05:30.100 --> 00:05:33.400
    you know, the market has been involved, but if you want to buy stocks, here's a

    111
    00:05:33.400 --> 00:05:34.800
    couple of names that you can just

    112
    00:05:35.300 --> 00:05:39.500
    Your portfolio. So of course he did that on my advice and

    113
    00:05:38.500 --> 00:05:41.300
    then about a year later. He

    114
    00:05:41.300 --> 00:05:44.400
    was blaming me because I'm the one that picked the stocks from in the

    115
    00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:45.000
    stocks were Downs.

    116
    00:05:45.800 --> 00:05:48.600
    I just thought that was kind of interesting because it I did

    117
    00:05:48.600 --> 00:05:51.400
    exactly the opposite of what I should have said to him right in terms

    118
    00:05:51.400 --> 00:05:54.400
    of how we should be approaching these but you know, this was play

    119
    00:05:54.400 --> 00:05:57.500
    money for him. So I let him learn a little bit about what it

    120
    00:05:57.500 --> 00:06:00.300
    really means to invest in those types of questions of the wrong questions,

    121
    00:06:00.300 --> 00:06:03.000
    right as you just mentioned Peter and so I thought it was

    122
    00:06:03.200 --> 00:06:06.400
    a really good it was a it was a learning moment for him to understand that

    123
    00:06:06.400 --> 00:06:09.700
    you don't just pick stocks and they go up. Oh, absolutely and like

    124
    00:06:09.700 --> 00:06:13.000
    I I actually I do that with with clients. I'll

    125
    00:06:12.200 --> 00:06:13.600
    say to them.

    126
    00:06:14.600 --> 00:06:17.100
    If you want to open up a small account and I

    127
    00:06:17.100 --> 00:06:20.000
    use the term your Casino money. Hey, you got to go to

    128
    00:06:20.100 --> 00:06:23.300
    the casino and sit there and maybe go out to dinner have a drink play the

    129
    00:06:23.300 --> 00:06:26.500
    slot sit at a table if you lose a hundred or 200

    130
    00:06:26.500 --> 00:06:27.100
    or $300.

    131
    00:06:28.500 --> 00:06:30.300
    It was a night of entertainment you had a good time.

    132
    00:06:31.300 --> 00:06:34.600
    I see take your Casino money and put it into an account and

    133
    00:06:34.600 --> 00:06:37.300
    buy a couple of stocks and just it's it's

    134
    00:06:37.300 --> 00:06:40.400
    good education for you. You might learn some valuable

    135
    00:06:40.400 --> 00:06:43.900
    lessons, but you're gonna pay really close attention. Even

    136
    00:06:43.900 --> 00:06:46.200
    if it's only five or 10 shares of a

    137
    00:06:46.200 --> 00:06:49.200
    company and you'll you'll learn a lot for it. So I think there is certainly a

    138
    00:06:49.200 --> 00:06:52.900
    value in that but with large sums of Money Retirement accounts

    139
    00:06:52.900 --> 00:06:55.400
    brokerage accounts. Absolutely not none of

    140
    00:06:55.400 --> 00:06:58.700
    this stock picking. It's got to be a low cost. Well Diversified portfolio.

    141
    00:06:58.700 --> 00:07:01.100
    So I'm hearing you say it's okay to sit in a

    142
    00:07:01.100 --> 00:07:01.300
    little bit.

    143
    00:07:02.300 --> 00:07:05.800
    Any bit tiny bit? Absolutely. No, I didn't. You

    144
    00:07:05.800 --> 00:07:08.300
    know, I like to play the market myself, but I'm only doing

    145
    00:07:08.300 --> 00:07:11.500
    that with my my entertainment dollars not my

    146
    00:07:11.500 --> 00:07:14.500
    long-term assets that that my family

    147
    00:07:14.500 --> 00:07:18.100
    and I are going to need at some point in time. Right? So Peter

    148
    00:07:17.100 --> 00:07:20.400
    you've been talking a lot about planning right and and

    149
    00:07:20.400 --> 00:07:23.200
    I've been in this business for a long time as with you

    150
    00:07:23.200 --> 00:07:27.500
    you and I've worked together for many many years. I've noticed

    151
    00:07:26.500 --> 00:07:29.800
    the value proposition of financial advisor

    152
    00:07:29.800 --> 00:07:32.300
    has changed right at one point. It was that

    153
    00:07:32.300 --> 00:07:36.200
    stock picker many many years ago. So this

    154
    00:07:35.200 --> 00:07:38.400
    day and age what what do

    155
    00:07:38.400 --> 00:07:41.500
    you see as the value proposition to a financial advisor?

    156
    00:07:42.200 --> 00:07:46.000
    In my opinion, it has to be the plan because that's

    157
    00:07:45.300 --> 00:07:48.500
    where we've had success as a firm. I've

    158
    00:07:48.500 --> 00:07:51.300
    had success as an advisor clients have had success

    159
    00:07:51.300 --> 00:07:54.700
    following that advice and and really

    160
    00:07:54.700 --> 00:07:57.100
    it's about the planning and that's the most

    161
    00:07:57.100 --> 00:08:00.600
    valuable advice. I give to my clients. Hey, we're with

    162
    00:08:00.600 --> 00:08:04.200
    a low cost. Well Diversified portfolio. We're going

    163
    00:08:03.200 --> 00:08:06.300
    to get a market return the market for us

    164
    00:08:06.300 --> 00:08:09.300
    taking risk. We will get a market return and my

    165
    00:08:09.300 --> 00:08:12.700
    return will be no different than my clients because we invest in very similar

    166
    00:08:12.700 --> 00:08:16.300
    similarly constructed portfolios, but

    167
    00:08:15.300 --> 00:08:16.700
    really

    168
    00:08:17.900 --> 00:08:20.800
    Whether we get an 8% return 9% 10%

    169
    00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:23.300
    return long-term. It's really

    170
    00:08:23.300 --> 00:08:24.100
    the plan.

    171
    00:08:25.200 --> 00:08:28.500
    That is is going to drive all that and just because

    172
    00:08:28.500 --> 00:08:31.400
    their portfolio is up a certain year that that's

    173
    00:08:31.400 --> 00:08:32.800
    great and they like to see that.

    174
    00:08:33.900 --> 00:08:36.100
    But again, the plan is going to say well geez, I

    175
    00:08:36.100 --> 00:08:39.700
    know now I can retire at age 62. I'm

    176
    00:08:39.700 --> 00:08:43.600
    going to take Social Security at 67 when

    177
    00:08:42.600 --> 00:08:44.700
    I retire at 62.

    178
    00:08:45.500 --> 00:08:48.500
    I'm going to be able to pay for my own health insurance until

    179
    00:08:48.500 --> 00:08:51.700
    I hit MediCare at age 65. I mean, those are questions

    180
    00:08:51.700 --> 00:08:54.300
    that aren't even related to a rate

    181
    00:08:54.300 --> 00:08:57.300
    of return or a stock pick or any of that. They're planning

    182
    00:08:57.300 --> 00:09:00.300
    questions, but they're extremely important to people the very

    183
    00:09:00.300 --> 00:09:03.300
    comprehensive list of questions versus should you be in a

    184
    00:09:03.300 --> 00:09:06.100
    60% stock 40% bomb for far beyond that

    185
    00:09:06.100 --> 00:09:09.400
    correct? Correct, but it's it's about the the layers and

    186
    00:09:09.400 --> 00:09:13.200
    the investment management risk reward asset

    187
    00:09:12.200 --> 00:09:16.000
    allocation being allocated appropriately.

    188
    00:09:17.400 --> 00:09:20.100
    According to your risk tolerance that's all part of it. But you

    189
    00:09:20.100 --> 00:09:23.200
    do when I sit down with clients we talk about the

    190
    00:09:23.200 --> 00:09:26.200
    performance we talk about what the markets have been doing and we really start

    191
    00:09:26.200 --> 00:09:29.700
    to get into those those items Healthcare Medicare long

    192
    00:09:29.700 --> 00:09:33.900
    term care gifting money to people grandchildren

    193
    00:09:32.900 --> 00:09:35.700
    setting up a 529

    194
    00:09:35.700 --> 00:09:38.200
    accounts. All those types of things. These

    195
    00:09:38.200 --> 00:09:41.200
    are the goals and the things that are important to clients and they come

    196
    00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:45.000
    through the planning process. Yeah, that's extremely valuable right life

    197
    00:09:44.100 --> 00:09:47.800
    comes at you fast, and there's a number of instances in

    198
    00:09:47.800 --> 00:09:50.400
    my personal life where I've leaned on you for things that

    199
    00:09:50.400 --> 00:09:53.100
    are fun far beyond investable assets.

    200
    00:09:54.100 --> 00:09:57.200
    So that's that's good. So what so far listeners out there.

    201
    00:09:57.200 --> 00:10:01.100
    I mean you're looking for a financial professional that

    202
    00:10:00.100 --> 00:10:02.300
    is planning focused.

    203
    00:10:03.400 --> 00:10:06.700
    But also from a very comprehensive standpoint Beyond

    204
    00:10:06.700 --> 00:10:09.700
    stocks bonds mutual funds Exchange Trade

    205
    00:10:09.700 --> 00:10:10.300
    funds Etc.

    206
    00:10:11.300 --> 00:10:14.500
    So let's one of the things that's a

    207
    00:10:14.500 --> 00:10:15.100
    change gears a little bit.

    208
    00:10:16.500 --> 00:10:19.500
    You know, there's over 300,000 financial advisors in

    209
    00:10:19.500 --> 00:10:22.400
    the United States, right? The term

    210
    00:10:22.400 --> 00:10:25.700
    fiduciary comes up quite a bit and I'm

    211
    00:10:25.700 --> 00:10:28.800
    always surprised maybe I'm not as surprised

    212
    00:10:28.800 --> 00:10:31.600
    as I once was that investors are don't

    213
    00:10:31.600 --> 00:10:34.900
    necessarily understand that sometimes advisors are

    214
    00:10:34.900 --> 00:10:38.200
    acting any fiduciary capacity and sometimes

    215
    00:10:37.200 --> 00:10:40.300
    they are not before we

    216
    00:10:40.300 --> 00:10:41.500
    jump into that.

    217
    00:10:42.400 --> 00:10:45.500
    Explain to us Peter. What is a fiduciary? Well, it's

    218
    00:10:45.500 --> 00:10:48.700
    it's the highest standard of care in in

    219
    00:10:48.700 --> 00:10:51.700
    our industry. And I've sort of I've been on both

    220
    00:10:51.700 --> 00:10:54.300
    sides of it. So I have to act in my

    221
    00:10:54.300 --> 00:10:57.200
    clients best interest not only being affiliated with with a

    222
    00:10:57.200 --> 00:11:00.600
    palette but also being a cfp and really

    223
    00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:03.300
    what that comes down to at the end of the day

    224
    00:11:03.300 --> 00:11:05.300
    is the type of

    225
    00:11:06.600 --> 00:11:09.200
    Investment product. I'm going to refer to

    226
    00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:12.900
    everything as a product that we put our clients into and

    227
    00:11:13.700 --> 00:11:18.800
    I've got a really focus on the cost the level

    228
    00:11:17.800 --> 00:11:20.600
    of care below a fiduciary. It's

    229
    00:11:20.600 --> 00:11:23.400
    referred to as the suitability standard. Does that mean if I'm

    230
    00:11:23.400 --> 00:11:26.800
    not a fiduciary? I'm doing something unethical absolutely not

    231
    00:11:26.800 --> 00:11:30.300
    the last thing I want to do because I again I was there I've worked

    232
    00:11:30.300 --> 00:11:33.200
    with clients where I was just doing by this suitability standard. I

    233
    00:11:33.200 --> 00:11:36.200
    was not a fiduciary at the end of the

    234
    00:11:36.200 --> 00:11:40.200
    day. I'm putting my clients into something that is putting more money back

    235
    00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:43.100
    into their pocket meaning the fees

    236
    00:11:42.100 --> 00:11:46.200
    and the costs associated with those products are

    237
    00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:49.200
    much lower. We have

    238
    00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:52.500
    no Front End Sales charges. We have no backend sales charges.

    239
    00:11:52.500 --> 00:11:55.100
    So I said to clients that are that are coming on board.

    240
    00:11:56.100 --> 00:11:59.400
    I will bend over backwards to make sure that you are happy but at some

    241
    00:11:59.400 --> 00:12:03.300
    point if you don't realize the value

    242
    00:12:02.300 --> 00:12:05.500
    of our services or you chose to go elsewhere, you

    243
    00:12:05.500 --> 00:12:08.800
    can do that. You're going to be able to take what you have here and

    244
    00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:11.400
    move that elsewhere. You're not going to be tied up for three or

    245
    00:12:11.400 --> 00:12:14.300
    five or ten years. No surrender charges or big

    246
    00:12:14.300 --> 00:12:17.000
    fees to go acting in their best interest and that helps

    247
    00:12:17.200 --> 00:12:20.100
    to protect them. And I think it's extremely important that people

    248
    00:12:20.100 --> 00:12:20.700
    need to ask

    249
    00:12:22.800 --> 00:12:25.700
    Are you a fiduciary is your firm of fiduciary? And how

    250
    00:12:25.700 --> 00:12:27.600
    do you work? So when?

    251
    00:12:28.900 --> 00:12:32.200
    Investors are looking for a financial

    252
    00:12:31.200 --> 00:12:34.400
    professional to work with right what I'm

    253
    00:12:34.400 --> 00:12:37.800
    hearing someone the first things I should look for and they should ask about it potentially

    254
    00:12:37.800 --> 00:12:40.600
    even get it in writing. Are you acting any fiduciary

    255
    00:12:40.600 --> 00:12:45.100
    capacity? Are you acting in my best interest? Correct? They

    256
    00:12:44.100 --> 00:12:48.800
    absolutely should and and interview multiple

    257
    00:12:47.800 --> 00:12:52.600
    people Tom has

    258
    00:12:51.600 --> 00:12:54.200
    been not only a great client. But I've worked

    259
    00:12:54.200 --> 00:12:57.500
    with many of Tom's family members. Why because they come to Tom. Jeez

    260
    00:12:57.500 --> 00:13:00.700
    Tom. I've got some questions. Who should I work with? Well talk

    261
    00:13:00.700 --> 00:13:03.400
    to Peter. So if you have a friend or family member who you

    262
    00:13:03.400 --> 00:13:06.500
    know works with an advisor ask for that that person's name.

    263
    00:13:06.500 --> 00:13:09.400
    And if they will if you have a friend or family member they'll

    264
    00:13:09.400 --> 00:13:12.300
    refer them over if they enjoy working with them. So I think that's a

    265
    00:13:12.300 --> 00:13:15.800
    good place to start but interview them there's many checklists

    266
    00:13:15.800 --> 00:13:18.800
    online and I think one of the things you want to ask about are

    267
    00:13:18.800 --> 00:13:21.800
    you a fiduciary understand what that means and it's

    268
    00:13:21.800 --> 00:13:24.900
    it's something important because there's

    269
    00:13:24.900 --> 00:13:27.300
    plenty of us out. There aren't as many as probably there should

    270
    00:13:27.300 --> 00:13:28.900
    be but there's plenty fiduc.

    271
    00:13:28.900 --> 00:13:30.000
    He's out there for you to work with.

    272
    00:13:30.800 --> 00:13:33.000
    Absolutely. You made a really good point. I was doing a little research.

    273
    00:13:34.300 --> 00:13:35.600
    Knowing that we were going to have this.

    274
    00:13:36.500 --> 00:13:39.400
    Talk today the three of us and you know,

    275
    00:13:39.400 --> 00:13:42.700
    the number one way investors find their financial advisors through

    276
    00:13:42.700 --> 00:13:45.500
    through referrals. Right number two is through

    277
    00:13:45.500 --> 00:13:49.500
    you know online searches and things like that. So

    278
    00:13:48.500 --> 00:13:51.200
    I think that's that's really important

    279
    00:13:51.200 --> 00:13:54.200
    when you're looking for financial audience advisor talk to your family

    280
    00:13:54.200 --> 00:13:57.800
    your friends people who have or may have similar Financial

    281
    00:13:57.800 --> 00:14:00.200
    situations as you do but I

    282
    00:14:00.200 --> 00:14:03.600
    think you know, the important thing. Is that the very good question. Are

    283
    00:14:03.600 --> 00:14:06.900
    you acting and a fiduciary capacity at all times, right?

    284
    00:14:11.300 --> 00:14:14.100
    We talked about the planning process one of the things I want to

    285
    00:14:14.100 --> 00:14:17.700
    touch upon and Mike will turn to you is that sometimes giving

    286
    00:14:17.700 --> 00:14:20.700
    good advice means saying no not giving

    287
    00:14:20.700 --> 00:14:23.900
    the client what they're looking for. Right and

    288
    00:14:23.900 --> 00:14:27.400
    I've seen advisors who act

    289
    00:14:26.400 --> 00:14:29.700
    as more of a facilitator

    290
    00:14:29.700 --> 00:14:32.400
    very high service level but whatever the client

    291
    00:14:32.400 --> 00:14:35.400
    wants they they get what are some of the Perils of

    292
    00:14:35.400 --> 00:14:35.500
    that?

    293
    00:14:36.700 --> 00:14:40.200
    The Perils are that you become all

    294
    00:14:39.200 --> 00:14:42.100
    things to all people and as I think

    295
    00:14:42.100 --> 00:14:46.400
    Thomas you have famously said if everything's

    296
    00:14:45.400 --> 00:14:48.600
    important nothing's important and

    297
    00:14:48.600 --> 00:14:51.300
    I think from the perspective of advice that we work with

    298
    00:14:51.300 --> 00:14:54.100
    it's it's you know

    299
    00:14:54.100 --> 00:14:57.800
    when you when you think about that kind of cafeteria style

    300
    00:14:57.800 --> 00:14:59.000
    service.

    301
    00:14:59.900 --> 00:15:01.400
    It becomes very difficult to.

    302
    00:15:02.900 --> 00:15:05.500
    Address clients needs concerns or

    303
    00:15:05.500 --> 00:15:08.000
    fears because you know

    304
    00:15:08.700 --> 00:15:11.400
    in terms of of investment investment advice,

    305
    00:15:11.400 --> 00:15:14.400
    if you're if you've got clients that are in individual stocks

    306
    00:15:14.400 --> 00:15:17.800
    and you have clients in Diversified portfolios, or they're in a more passive

    307
    00:15:17.800 --> 00:15:21.200
    investment or they're in a tactical investment. You're constantly

    308
    00:15:20.200 --> 00:15:23.400
    pivoting to try to answer questions to

    309
    00:15:23.400 --> 00:15:26.300
    all these different constituencies within your practice what we

    310
    00:15:26.300 --> 00:15:29.700
    find in our in our work is that you know advisors that

    311
    00:15:29.700 --> 00:15:32.400
    have a philosophy advisors have a way that

    312
    00:15:32.400 --> 00:15:36.000
    they approach the capital markets and how they construct portfolios I

    313
    00:15:35.500 --> 00:15:39.000
    tend to do the best because their clients are like-minded and

    314
    00:15:38.400 --> 00:15:41.300
    it keeps them in their seats even when markets are

    315
    00:15:41.300 --> 00:15:42.900
    difficult. So having a

    316
    00:15:43.800 --> 00:15:46.200
    Kind of a carte blanche or

    317
    00:15:46.200 --> 00:15:49.900
    I like to say cafeteria style investment or at

    318
    00:15:49.900 --> 00:15:52.300
    least offering makes it more difficult for you to keep your

    319
    00:15:52.300 --> 00:15:56.200
    clients in line. I think over time and I think what I

    320
    00:15:56.200 --> 00:15:59.600
    like like best about being at symmetries, we do have that investment philosophy. That's

    321
    00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:02.700
    straightforward. It doesn't deviate and most

    322
    00:16:02.700 --> 00:16:05.000
    of the advice that work with us tend to have

    323
    00:16:05.100 --> 00:16:08.300
    that same philosophy. The interesting thing about that too is you notice

    324
    00:16:08.300 --> 00:16:11.300
    when markets are fairly volatile which where this is really important

    325
    00:16:11.300 --> 00:16:14.700
    is that you know investors that

    326
    00:16:14.700 --> 00:16:18.000
    kind of adhere to similar investment

    327
    00:16:17.400 --> 00:16:20.700
    strategy like symmetries is that they tend

    328
    00:16:20.700 --> 00:16:23.800
    to have less gap between What markets are doing and what

    329
    00:16:23.800 --> 00:16:26.300
    their Investments are doing because they tend to stay in their seats. They're not

    330
    00:16:26.300 --> 00:16:29.800
    moving around behaviorally moving in and out of the market or moving in and

    331
    00:16:29.800 --> 00:16:31.600
    out of Investments. And I think that's sometimes can be the

    332
    00:16:32.400 --> 00:16:35.700
    the offshoot of having a strategy where

    333
    00:16:35.700 --> 00:16:37.200
    you're just trying to be everything to everybody.

    334
    00:16:38.800 --> 00:16:41.200
    I'm going to unpack use it a lot of really yeah, I get

    335
    00:16:41.200 --> 00:16:44.100
    there. Sorry, but no. No, I just want to make sure our listeners get it to get

    336
    00:16:44.100 --> 00:16:47.700
    some really really good insight there Mike. So first

    337
    00:16:47.700 --> 00:16:50.800
    and foremost you talk about an investment philosophy

    338
    00:16:50.800 --> 00:16:53.700
    and what I'm hearing you say is that we're talking

    339
    00:16:53.700 --> 00:16:56.100
    about advice, right and if someone wants to

    340
    00:16:56.100 --> 00:16:58.200
    give advice you have to have a stake in the ground.

    341
    00:16:59.400 --> 00:17:02.300
    You have to have that place where your your view on

    342
    00:17:02.300 --> 00:17:04.200
    how Capital markets work?

    343
    00:17:04.900 --> 00:17:07.400
    And if you don't have that view you might fall into that

    344
    00:17:07.400 --> 00:17:08.700
    facilitator capacity.

    345
    00:17:10.300 --> 00:17:13.300
    The other thing that she said I'm glad you

    346
    00:17:13.300 --> 00:17:16.300
    said it as you talked a lot about behavior and what I'm hearing you

    347
    00:17:16.300 --> 00:17:19.500
    say is the study we've used many times the dial

    348
    00:17:19.500 --> 00:17:22.500
    bar study for our listeners. Could you talk a little bit about what that dial bar

    349
    00:17:22.500 --> 00:17:26.000
    research shows us sure is that it shows that the the investor

    350
    00:17:25.200 --> 00:17:26.600
    over, you know?

    351
    00:17:27.600 --> 00:17:30.100
    Many time periods. I mean they updated every year but it goes

    352
    00:17:30.100 --> 00:17:33.600
    back a number of years and it looks at what investors

    353
    00:17:33.600 --> 00:17:36.200
    do in terms of investing in

    354
    00:17:36.200 --> 00:17:39.600
    the let's say the S&P 500 as an index versus what the

    355
    00:17:39.600 --> 00:17:43.300
    index does and we find year in and year out that investors

    356
    00:17:42.300 --> 00:17:45.200
    tend to underperform the

    357
    00:17:45.200 --> 00:17:48.500
    index and the question always is Peter and you know this why

    358
    00:17:48.500 --> 00:17:51.500
    and it's because they're holding period is

    359
    00:17:51.500 --> 00:17:54.600
    tends to be I think it's less it used to be in the old days three

    360
    00:17:54.600 --> 00:17:57.300
    three plus years now. It's three minus here. It's less

    361
    00:17:57.300 --> 00:18:00.200
    than three years of holding period of time, which means they're

    362
    00:18:00.900 --> 00:18:03.500
    Behaviorally trying to in some

    363
    00:18:03.500 --> 00:18:06.400
    ways time the market and so what we

    364
    00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:09.000
    try to do at least in as I talk

    365
    00:18:09.100 --> 00:18:12.300
    to advisors is to try to educate them and educate clients as

    366
    00:18:12.300 --> 00:18:15.300
    well that you know, we want to close that Gap we

    367
    00:18:15.300 --> 00:18:18.200
    call that the the performance Gap right?

    368
    00:18:18.200 --> 00:18:22.000
    There's a gap between what investments do and what the investor

    369
    00:18:21.300 --> 00:18:24.300
    does right? We know this plenty of Dad out

    370
    00:18:24.300 --> 00:18:27.100
    there to show that so how do we do that? Peter had talked about a little

    371
    00:18:27.100 --> 00:18:30.300
    bit earlier is we look at things like, okay, what's important? How do

    372
    00:18:30.300 --> 00:18:33.600
    we close that Gap? It comes from financial planning. It comes

    373
    00:18:33.600 --> 00:18:37.000
    from portfolio selection, not necessarily portfolio

    374
    00:18:36.300 --> 00:18:39.400
    management, but portfolio selection in terms

    375
    00:18:39.400 --> 00:18:42.600
    of picking the right model of the right strategy for for clients

    376
    00:18:42.600 --> 00:18:45.000
    education and communication with clients. I

    377
    00:18:45.100 --> 00:18:48.900
    think those are great ways that we see that behavioral Gap

    378
    00:18:48.900 --> 00:18:51.700
    closing through time and that and

    379
    00:18:51.700 --> 00:18:54.900
    ends up being a an experience

    380
    00:18:54.900 --> 00:18:57.000
    that clients will be with their advisors for a long time

    381
    00:18:57.300 --> 00:19:00.400
    because you focus on the things that matter not the investment

    382
    00:19:00.400 --> 00:19:00.700
    itself.

    383
    00:19:01.800 --> 00:19:02.700
    a great computer

    384
    00:19:03.500 --> 00:19:06.800
    You're the the man in the seat here. So talk

    385
    00:19:06.800 --> 00:19:09.200
    to us a little about that. Right? I mean that dial bar study is

    386
    00:19:09.200 --> 00:19:11.600
    pretty telling every year investors are underperforming.

    387
    00:19:12.300 --> 00:19:15.900
    You focus on planning. How does planning help with the

    388
    00:19:15.900 --> 00:19:18.200
    long-term thinking that is required for

    389
    00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:20.500
    successful experience. It comes into

    390
    00:19:21.800 --> 00:19:24.500
    Not only the planning but educating clients and

    391
    00:19:24.500 --> 00:19:27.600
    communication and the example I'll use and we were

    392
    00:19:27.600 --> 00:19:27.800
    all.

    393
    00:19:28.500 --> 00:19:32.200
    working from back home during the the pandemic and

    394
    00:19:33.900 --> 00:19:36.200
    the markets dropped about a

    395
    00:19:36.200 --> 00:19:36.800
    third

    396
    00:19:37.800 --> 00:19:40.700
    so about 33% in about a month's time thinking

    397
    00:19:40.700 --> 00:19:43.600
    the numbers are 33% over 34 days 1/3.

    398
    00:19:44.300 --> 00:19:47.300
    And we're sitting here stuck at home. We think the world is going

    399
    00:19:47.300 --> 00:19:50.400
    to end and my message to my clients because

    400
    00:19:50.400 --> 00:19:54.000
    it's the message of our firm message that I truly believe.

    401
    00:19:55.300 --> 00:19:55.700
    And it wasn't easy.

    402
    00:19:56.400 --> 00:19:59.600
    No, we're not doing anything this too shall

    403
    00:19:59.600 --> 00:19:59.700
    pass.

    404
    00:20:00.600 --> 00:20:03.600
    You know, this is the.com bubble. This

    405
    00:20:03.600 --> 00:20:06.600
    is 911. This is the

    406
    00:20:06.600 --> 00:20:09.900
    great financial crisis of 2008.

    407
    00:20:10.600 --> 00:20:13.400
    It doesn't necessarily matter what the event

    408
    00:20:13.400 --> 00:20:16.500
    is because everyone know Peter is a pandemic. It's different like you're

    409
    00:20:16.500 --> 00:20:20.100
    right, but you're not it's the uncertainty and what

    410
    00:20:19.100 --> 00:20:22.700
    lo and behold what happens after the

    411
    00:20:22.700 --> 00:20:23.900
    market drops a third.

    412
    00:20:24.800 --> 00:20:27.800
    In March February and to March it

    413
    00:20:27.800 --> 00:20:30.700
    shoots back up. It comes roaring back why we

    414
    00:20:30.700 --> 00:20:34.100
    had no vaccine. We still were unemployment had

    415
    00:20:33.100 --> 00:20:36.200
    still not hit its peak because of

    416
    00:20:36.200 --> 00:20:39.900
    all the you know, retail and entertainment losses

    417
    00:20:39.900 --> 00:20:42.200
    that that took place in in this country and around the

    418
    00:20:42.200 --> 00:20:45.000
    world. We still have this crazy election in front

    419
    00:20:45.100 --> 00:20:48.800
    of us. There was still uncertainty but why why did it happen and I

    420
    00:20:48.800 --> 00:20:51.500
    don't think there's necessarily an answer but the lesson learned

    421
    00:20:51.500 --> 00:20:54.800
    is we stay in our seats regardless of what's going on because

    422
    00:20:54.800 --> 00:20:57.500
    the markets have they've always come back and I

    423
    00:20:57.500 --> 00:20:59.500
    believe any time we hit something.

    424
    00:21:00.700 --> 00:21:03.300
    They'll come back again. We just don't know when so that

    425
    00:21:03.300 --> 00:21:06.100
    experience because I I think

    426
    00:21:06.100 --> 00:21:09.200
    you use the term staking in the stand or stake in the ground. That was my

    427
    00:21:09.200 --> 00:21:12.200
    stake in the ground. And now as we went through all of this in

    428
    00:21:12.200 --> 00:21:15.500
    2022 with all of the uncertainty and inflation and

    429
    00:21:15.500 --> 00:21:18.700
    gas prices and all of that impacting

    430
    00:21:18.700 --> 00:21:20.700
    the markets interest rates being increased.

    431
    00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:25.200
    People said yeah, I remember what you said back during the

    432
    00:21:25.200 --> 00:21:28.200
    pandemic. So yeah, okay that that makes sense. It's the

    433
    00:21:28.200 --> 00:21:30.300
    messaging my messages consistent.

    434
    00:21:31.200 --> 00:21:34.000
    And when people hear that, there's a sense of confidence like, you know what he was

    435
    00:21:34.200 --> 00:21:36.400
    right last time. He'll probably be right this time, too.

    436
    00:21:37.400 --> 00:21:40.200
    Fantastic, and I remember that Panda right that

    437
    00:21:40.200 --> 00:21:43.500
    first quarter of 2020 was one of the top 10 worst

    438
    00:21:43.500 --> 00:21:48.100
    quarters in the United States history going back to 1926. The

    439
    00:21:47.100 --> 00:21:50.200
    second quarter of 2020 was one of the top 10

    440
    00:21:50.200 --> 00:21:53.400
    best quarters the United States ever experienced going

    441
    00:21:53.400 --> 00:21:56.200
    back. And and the funny thing is if we had

    442
    00:21:56.200 --> 00:21:59.200
    been if we had moved our money out of we did

    443
    00:21:59.200 --> 00:22:02.500
    not stay calm and we moved money out

    444
    00:22:02.500 --> 00:22:05.300
    of the market in March. What would

    445
    00:22:05.300 --> 00:22:08.700
    we have missed? When do we get back in? It's it's

    446
    00:22:08.700 --> 00:22:11.200
    difficult. It's difficult to sit there

    447
    00:22:11.200 --> 00:22:14.100
    when the market is dropping and say my gosh we have to do

    448
    00:22:14.100 --> 00:22:17.600
    something but you're also playing the same game when you get out. It's like

    449
    00:22:17.600 --> 00:22:20.200
    well if you get out, okay well, but then the market will eventually

    450
    00:22:20.200 --> 00:22:21.700
    come back. Well, when do you get back in?

    451
    00:22:22.600 --> 00:22:25.300
    And and and we just see long-term what the

    452
    00:22:25.300 --> 00:22:26.600
    results are you're better off.

    453
    00:22:27.400 --> 00:22:30.500
    Staying going dealing with the rollercoaster ride

    454
    00:22:30.500 --> 00:22:33.500
    staying in your seat versus making rash decisions based

    455
    00:22:33.500 --> 00:22:36.100
    upon fear and emotion Peter Michael. Thank you so much

    456
    00:22:36.100 --> 00:22:39.400
    for joining us here today that concludes part one of our discussion

    457
    00:22:39.400 --> 00:22:42.200
    on choosing the right financial advisor. I look

    458
    00:22:42.200 --> 00:22:45.200
    forward to continuing the conversation at part two, and if you want to

    459
    00:22:45.200 --> 00:22:48.800
    look at any of our previous unfiltered Finance podcasts, they're

    460
    00:22:48.800 --> 00:22:51.700
    available wherever you might be getting your podcast today. So,

    461
    00:22:51.700 --> 00:22:53.400
    thank you till next time bye-bye.

    462
    00:22:53.900 --> 00:22:56.500
    Symmetry Partners LLC is an

    463
    00:22:56.500 --> 00:22:59.500
    investment advisor firm registered with the Securities and

    464
    00:22:59.500 --> 00:23:02.200
    Exchange Commission The Firm only transacts business

    465
    00:23:02.200 --> 00:23:06.200
    in states where it is properly registered or excluded

    466
    00:23:05.200 --> 00:23:10.000
    or Exempted from registration requirements registration

    467
    00:23:08.100 --> 00:23:11.700
    of an investment advisor does

    468
    00:23:11.700 --> 00:23:14.900
    not imply any specific level of skill or training and

    469
    00:23:14.900 --> 00:23:17.400
    does not constitute an endorsement of the firm

    470
    00:23:17.400 --> 00:23:20.500
    by the commission. No one should assume that future performance

    471
    00:23:20.500 --> 00:23:23.600
    of any specific investment investment strategy

    472
    00:23:23.600 --> 00:23:26.900
    product or non-investment related content

    473
    00:23:26.900 --> 00:23:29.200
    made reference to directly or indirectly in

    474
    00:23:29.200 --> 00:23:31.400
    this material will be profitable.

    475
    00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:35.400
    As with any investment strategy there is the possibility of

    476
    00:23:35.400 --> 00:23:38.600
    profitability as well as loss due to

    477
    00:23:38.600 --> 00:23:41.600
    various factors including changing market conditions.

    478
    00:23:41.600 --> 00:23:44.800
    And/or applicable laws the content

    479
    00:23:44.800 --> 00:23:47.800
    may not be reflective of current opinions or

    480
    00:23:47.800 --> 00:23:50.500
    positions. Please note the material

    481
    00:23:50.500 --> 00:23:53.800
    is provided for educational and background use only moreover.

    482
    00:23:53.800 --> 00:23:57.000
    You should not assume that any discussion or information

    483
    00:23:56.700 --> 00:23:59.700
    contained in this material Services the

    484
    00:23:59.700 --> 00:24:03.300
    receipt of or as a substitute for personalized

    485
    00:24:02.300 --> 00:24:04.500
    investment advice.