Avsnitt
-
It's that time of the week again as Niall Boylan is joined by his former producer and good friend AJ Walsh to break down the biggest stories making headlines in Ireland and around the world.
This week, they discuss Metallica's generous €80,000 donation to Irish charities during their Dublin visit, RTÉ's decision to make dozens of presenters employees after the bogus self employment controversy, fuel prices as excise duty changes begin to take effect, and the US Supreme Court's decision to uphold birthright citizenship in a major setback for Donald Trump.
They also examine the bizarre Empire State Building marriage proposal that divided the internet, the guilty verdict in the horrific Parnell Square knife attack, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's visit to Dublin as Ireland begins its EU Presidency, and growing calls for tougher border controls following new polling on immigration and the Irish border.
As always, expect plenty of laughs, strong opinions, behind the scenes stories from decades in broadcasting, and the kind of lively conversation that regularly disappears down unexpected rabbit holes.
Whether you agree with them or not, this is a fast paced, entertaining look at the week's biggest talking points that you won't want to miss.
-
What happens when you strip away the stigma, the myths, and the taboos surrounding sex?
In this fascinating and completely uncensored episode, Niall sits down with Clarity Mills, one of Ireland's best known dominatrices and a professional sex educator, for a candid conversation that explores a side of human sexuality many people are curious about but rarely discuss openly.
Together they delve into the world of BDSM, fetish culture, power exchange, dominance and submission, and why millions of people around the world are drawn to these experiences. Clarity explains the psychology behind consensual kink, the importance of trust, communication, boundaries, and aftercare, and why pain and pleasure can sometimes exist side by side.
The conversation also explores some of the most common fetishes, how they develop, and the misconceptions that surround them. Are people born with fetishes, or do they develop over time? What separates fantasy from reality? Why do some people enjoy giving up control, while others find satisfaction in taking it?
Niall asks the questions many people are too embarrassed to ask, covering everything from dominance and submission to the science of arousal, the role of consent, the emotional connection between partners, and how society's attitudes towards sex have evolved over the years.
Whether you're simply curious, looking to better understand alternative lifestyles, or interested in the psychology of human sexuality, this is an open, honest, and thought provoking discussion that challenges assumptions and offers a rare insight into a world that is often misunderstood.
This is an adult conversation about sex, relationships, consent, intimacy, fetish, BDSM, pain, pleasure, and the fascinating line where psychology and sexuality intersect.
-
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
Few criminal cases have shocked Ireland as deeply as the attack that left three young children fighting for their lives and an entire nation searching for answers.
In this episode, Niall is joined by journalist Fatima Gunning to examine the case of Riad Bouchaker, who has been found guilty on all eight counts of attempted murder of three young children, assault causing serious harm to their carer, assault causing harm to two other children and a young French man, along with production of a 36cm kitchen knife.
Fatima takes us through the evidence presented during the trial, the key moments that convinced the jury, and the events that unfolded on that horrific day. They also discuss the wider questions the case raises, from public safety and policing to whether there are lessons Ireland still refuses to learn.
This episode contains discussion of serious violence that some listeners may find distressing.
-
Should Ireland bring back the death penalty?
In this episode, Niall opens the lines to hear what listeners really think about one of the most divisive questions in criminal justice. If there were a referendum tomorrow, would you vote to restore capital punishment for the most horrific crimes, or should Ireland never return to state executions?
Supporters argue that some crimes are so evil that life imprisonment simply isn't enough. They believe the death penalty delivers justice for victims and their families, protects society from the worst offenders, and ensures that those guilty of the most heinous crimes can never offend again.
Opponents argue that no justice system is infallible and that executing an innocent person can never be undone. They also question whether the death penalty actually deters crime, pointing to research suggesting countries without capital punishment are not necessarily less safe. Others believe that, regardless of the crime, the State should never take a human life.
Around the world, capital punishment remains a reality in roughly 55 countries, while more than 140 have abolished it in law or no longer carry out executions. In the United States, the death penalty is still authorised in 27 states, although many rarely use it. Around 2,000 people remain on death row across America, while the number of executions each year is relatively small by comparison, typically measured in the dozens rather than hundreds.
Ireland has long since turned its back on capital punishment. The last execution carried out in the State was that of Michael Manning in 1954. The last death sentence imposed was in 1957, although it was later commuted to life imprisonment. Capital punishment was abolished for ordinary criminal offences in 1964, completely abolished in 1990, and its return was constitutionally prohibited following a referendum in 2001.
So where do you stand? Should Ireland ever bring back the death penalty for the worst crimes imaginable, or is life imprisonment the only punishment a modern democracy should allow?
-
Is Ireland's Bottle Return Scheme delivering on its environmental promises, or has it become an expensive inconvenience for consumers?
In this episode, Niall is joined by journalist Larissa Nolan to discuss one of the country's most divisive environmental initiatives. Larissa has been a vocal critic of the scheme and is even organising a live event to highlight what she believes are its many flaws.
They examine where millions of euro in unclaimed deposit money goes, why so much has been spent promoting the scheme, and whether it has genuinely increased recycling rates or simply added another cost and inconvenience for shoppers. Is the scheme encouraging better environmental behaviour, or has it become what critics describe as a stealth charge on ordinary consumers?
Supporters argue that the Bottle Return Scheme is helping to reduce litter, increase recycling rates, and bring Ireland into line with successful systems operating across Europe. Critics, however, say people were already recycling through household bins and civic amenity centres, and that the scheme has created unnecessary queues, extra costs for businesses, and additional hassle for consumers.
Niall also opens the phone lines to hear from listeners. Is the Bottle Return Scheme a success that deserves time to work, or has it become one of Ireland's biggest environmental mistakes?
-
Did We Get Covid Wrong? New Documents, Fauci, Wuhan and Ireland’s Covid Inquiry
On today’s podcast, Niall is joined by journalist John McGuirk from The Statement to discuss newly released White House documents that supporters of the lab leak theory say raise serious questions about Dr Anthony Fauci, US funding of coronavirus research in Wuhan, and whether people once dismissed as "conspiracy theorists" were written off too quickly during the Covid pandemic.
The conversation also turns to Ireland’s own Covid Inquiry, which has been criticised by some campaigners and commentators as lacking the independence and scrutiny needed to answer the biggest questions surrounding the Government’s handling of the pandemic. Is the inquiry a genuine search for the truth, or is it more about protecting political and institutional reputations?
Niall and John also examine John's recent article in The Statement, "Gabbard’s Files Shatter the Myth of Fauci as Neutral Observer." In the article, McGuirk argues that newly released documents disclosed by former US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard appear to show that Anthony Fauci was more closely involved with intelligence agencies than previously understood, that US taxpayer funding reached coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth Alliance, and that the documents raise fresh questions about Fauci's testimony before Congress and his role in shaping the public narrative surrounding the origins of Covid. McGuirk contends that the releases warrant a major re examination of the lab leak hypothesis and the official response during the pandemic.
Were legitimate questions ignored because they were politically inconvenient? Have governments and public health authorities been sufficiently transparent? And what lessons, if any, have we really learned from one of the biggest global events of modern times?
Join the debate as Niall and John McGuirk examine the evidence, the unanswered questions, and why the arguments over Covid are still far from over.
-
If You Were Housing Minister for One Day, What Would You Do?
Ireland's housing crisis has dominated political debate for years, yet for many people the dream of owning a home seems further away than ever. House prices remain high, rents continue to soar, and thousands of people are still waiting for social housing while homelessness remains at record levels.
On today's podcast, Niall is joined by Independent Ireland Councillor Noel Thomas to ask a simple question with no easy answer: If you were Housing Minister for one day, what would you actually do to solve Ireland's housing crisis?
The discussion follows comments from Housing Minister James Browne, who told Gript that reducing housing demand is not really his responsibility, insisting that the crisis is "all about supply." Browne pointed to the delivery of more than 36,000 homes last year, the highest number of social homes ever built by the State, rising planning permissions and increased housing commencements as evidence that Government policy is beginning to work. However, he also acknowledged that the pace of building must accelerate before house prices begin to moderate in any meaningful way.
The Minister also highlighted that Ireland's population has increased by around 810,000 people since 2014, equivalent to housing demand for roughly 250,000 homes, arguing that population growth, alongside years of underbuilding, has placed enormous pressure on the housing market. While acknowledging that migration has contributed to that growth, Browne said many newcomers are working in essential sectors such as healthcare and technology, adding that his role is to ensure enough homes are built for everyone living in Ireland.
But is the Government focusing on only half the problem? Should immigration be reduced until housing catches up? Should planning laws be radically overhauled? Should the State stop purchasing private homes for social housing? Should Ireland begin building entirely new towns, or is there another solution politicians are refusing to consider?
Join Niall and Councillor Noel Thomas as they debate the policies, challenge the assumptions, and ask listeners what they would do if they were handed the keys to the Department of Housing for just one day.
-
On today's podcast, Niall is joined by Sandra Adams, advocate for women's sex based rights, child safeguarding and fact based education, to discuss growing concerns over the Government's decision to require parents to use a Public Services Card to participate in the Department of Education's online consultation on school meals.
The consultation is intended to gather parents' views on the future of Ireland's school meals programme, but critics are questioning why people must verify their identity through the Public Services Card simply to submit their opinions. Supporters argue it is a sensible measure that prevents duplicate or fraudulent submissions and ensures the consultation reflects the views of genuine participants. Others believe it creates an unnecessary barrier to public participation and raises wider questions about privacy and government data collection.
The discussion also explores whether this is simply an isolated administrative decision or part of a broader shift towards digital identity. With the EU Digital Identity Wallet due to be introduced across member states over the coming years, some people fear Ireland is gradually becoming accustomed to using digital credentials to access an increasing number of public services. Others argue that secure digital identification will make life easier, reduce fraud, and improve access to government services without threatening individual freedoms.
So where should the line be drawn? Should proving who you are become a routine part of interacting with the State, even when responding to a public consultation? Or should citizens be able to express their views anonymously without having to verify their identity?
-
A new Red C poll suggests that public attitudes towards Ireland's border are changing, with more than a third of voters saying they would support the return of a hard border with Northern Ireland if it helped tackle illegal immigration. The findings come amid growing concern over claims that some asylum seekers are travelling into the Republic via Northern Ireland after first arriving in the UK, raising fresh questions about how Ireland protects its borders.
On this episode, Niall is joined by journalist and former barrister Laura Perrins, whose writing on immigration, border security and Irish politics has sparked widespread debate through her Substack, The West Brit. Laura has argued that Ireland needs a more realistic conversation about immigration, asylum policy and the state's ability to control who enters the country.
Supporters of tighter border controls say protecting the integrity of the asylum system is essential and that failing to properly police the border only encourages abuse, putting further pressure on housing, public services and taxpayers. Critics argue that any move towards a hard border would risk damaging North South relations, undermine the spirit of the Good Friday Agreement and create political tensions that many believed had been left in the past.
So where should the balance be struck? Is it time to accept that stronger border controls are necessary to restore confidence in Ireland's immigration system, or would reintroducing a hard border create more problems than it solves?
Join Niall and Laura Perrins for a robust discussion on one of the most divisive political questions facing Ireland today.
-
Should your employer be allowed to tell you when it's time to retire?
On this episode, Niall opens the phone lines to discuss whether mandatory retirement ages should become a thing of the past.
The debate comes as new legislation has come into effect in Ireland giving many employees the right to refuse compulsory retirement before the State pension age of 66. Workers whose employment contracts require them to retire before 66 can now formally notify their employer that they wish to continue working. Employers must consider the request and can only refuse if they can objectively justify enforcing the retirement age. The changes are designed to give older workers greater choice and flexibility, while helping bridge the gap to the State pension.
With people living longer and remaining healthier than ever before, should age alone determine when someone's career comes to an end?
Supporters of abolishing mandatory retirement say experience is invaluable, many older people still have plenty to contribute, and in an ageing society the economy needs skilled workers to stay in employment for longer. They also argue that forcing somebody out of work simply because they reach a certain birthday is outdated and amounts to age discrimination.
Others disagree. They believe mandatory retirement creates opportunities for younger workers, helps organisations plan for succession, and recognises that some jobs become more physically and mentally demanding with age. Critics also argue that older employees staying in the workplace longer could slow career progression for younger generations.
So where do you stand?
Should retirement be a personal choice based on your ability to do the job, or should there still be an age at which it's time to step aside?
Niall hears from callers on both sides of one of the biggest workplace debates facing Ireland today.
-
On today's episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, Niall is joined by journalist and Aontú communications officer Larissa Nolan to debate whether wheel clamping has outlived its usefulness.
Dublin City Council clamped more than 45,000 vehicles in 2024, making Ireland one of the few countries in Europe where wheel clamping remains a routine parking enforcement tool. While most European countries rely on fines, penalty points, or towing repeat offenders, motorists here can return to find their car immobilised until they pay a release fee.
Clamping was originally introduced to reduce the burden on the courts by avoiding prosecutions for unpaid parking fines. But in an age of instant online payments, automatic number plate recognition, and more efficient enforcement, is wheel clamping still necessary, or is it simply an outdated and heavy handed way of punishing motorists?
Niall and Larissa discuss whether clamping is an effective deterrent against illegal parking, or whether it unfairly leaves people stranded, causes unnecessary stress, and should be replaced with tougher fines for those who refuse to pay.
Should wheel clamping be outlawed, or is it the only language inconsiderate drivers understand? Join the debate as Niall also hears from callers with strong opinions on both sides of this divisive issue.
-
On today's episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, Niall is joined by podcaster and social commentator Elaine Mullally to debate one of the most controversial questions facing modern policing.
Should Gardaí have the power to seize your mobile phone without first obtaining a search warrant if they reasonably believe it contains evidence of a serious crime?
The debate has intensified following comments by former RTÉ broadcaster Joe Duffy, who argued that Gardaí should be able to confiscate mobile phones immediately if they suspect they contain vital evidence, even before obtaining judicial approval. Duffy suggested that waiting for a warrant can allow crucial evidence to be deleted or destroyed, prompting calls for stronger powers to help investigators tackle serious crime. His remarks have sparked fierce criticism from privacy advocates and some legal experts, who warn that allowing Gardaí to seize phones "on a hunch" could represent a significant erosion of civil liberties.
Smartphones now contain almost every aspect of our lives, from private messages and photographs to banking information, health records, location history, and confidential work documents. Supporters of stronger Garda powers argue that modern criminals increasingly rely on encrypted devices and that investigators need the ability to act immediately before evidence disappears. Opponents argue that innocent people should never risk having their most private information seized without independent judicial oversight.
Niall and Elaine discuss where the balance should lie between protecting the public from serious crime and protecting every citizen's right to privacy.
Should Gardaí be trusted with greater powers to seize mobile phones when they suspect criminal activity, or should a judge always have to approve it first? Join the debate as Niall also hears the views of callers from across Ireland.
-
On this week's News Round Up, Niall is joined by his good friend and former producer AJ Walsh to take a look back at the biggest stories making headlines over the past week, some deeply serious, others downright bizarre.
They discuss the guilty verdicts against Sir Jeffrey Donaldson and Lady Eleanor Donaldson, the growing calls to decriminalise all drugs for personal use, and the debate over whether single sex schools have a future in Ireland.
The conversation also turns to some of the week's lighter stories, including the Kentucky criminals caught with a bag labelled "Definitely Not a Bag Full of Drugs", the cow that brought the M1 motorway to a standstill, the latest cosmetic craze dubbed "Ozempic Ears", and new technology that could allow your car to decide whether you're fit to drive.
With plenty of laughs, a few disagreements and their usual honest opinions, Niall and AJ separate the serious from the ridiculous as they wrap up another unforgettable week in the news.
-
Should single sex schools become a thing of the past?
A new Department of Education survey has found that more than 73% of households with children attending single sex primary schools would like their school to become co educational. The findings come as the Government continues its policy of encouraging schools to reconfigure to mixed education where there is local demand, arguing that parents should have greater choice and that schools should better reflect modern Irish society.
On today's podcast, Niall opens the phone lines to ask whether Ireland should phase out single sex schools altogether, or whether they still have an important role to play.
Supporters of co educational schools argue that educating boys and girls together better prepares children for adult life, helping them develop stronger social skills, mutual respect and healthier relationships from an early age. They also say mixed schools break down gender stereotypes, encourage equality and reflect the real world, where men and women study, work and live together.
However, supporters of single sex education point to research suggesting there can be academic benefits. Some studies have found that girls in all girls schools are more likely to pursue subjects such as maths, science and engineering, while boys in all boys schools may participate more confidently in classroom discussions without feeling pressured by gender expectations. Other research has suggested fewer behavioural distractions and improved exam performance in certain subjects, although large international reviews have found that once factors such as family background and school selection are taken into account, the overall academic advantage of single sex education is small or inconsistent.
So, are single sex schools outdated in today's society, or do they still provide the best environment for children to learn and succeed? Should Ireland continue moving towards co education, or should parents always have the choice of sending their child to a boys only or girls only school?
Niall hears the opinions of callers from across the country as they debate one simple question:
Do you think single sex schools should be abolished?
-
TDs and Senators from across the political spectrum have recommended one of the biggest changes to Ireland's drug laws in decades, calling for the possession of all illegal drugs for personal use to be fully decriminalised. The recommendation, contained in the final report of the Oireachtas Committee on Drugs Use, follows similar proposals made by the Citizens' Assembly on Drug Use and argues that addiction should be treated primarily as a health issue rather than a criminal justice issue. The report also recommends expanding harm reduction services and moving Ireland further towards a health-led approach. In the past two days, Taoiseach Micheál Martin has confirmed the Government will give the recommendations "serious consideration", while supporters including committee chair Gary Gannon and the Social Democrats say the current system has failed and that criminalising addiction only pushes vulnerable people further from treatment.
On today's podcast, Niall is joined by Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín and Cllr Gavin Peppper, who strongly opposes the proposals. Tóibín argues that decriminalising possession of drugs such as cocaine and heroin would normalise drug use, weaken deterrence, and send the wrong message to young people at a time when Ireland is already facing a growing drugs crisis. He believes addiction should be treated compassionately, but insists that removing criminal sanctions would ultimately make the problem worse rather than better.
Is it time to accept that the war on drugs has failed and treat addiction as a public health issue? Or would decriminalising all drugs simply encourage more drug use and leave communities paying the price? Niall hears from Peadar Tóibín before opening the phone lines to ask listeners: Should Ireland decriminalise the possession of all drugs for personal use, or would it be a dangerous mistake?
-
Ireland's long-awaited Covid inquiry is finally underway, and already it is raising difficult questions. This week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin faced extensive questioning from the inquiry panel about the Government's handling of the pandemic, but unlike the public inquiries seen in the UK and elsewhere, the interviews are being conducted behind closed doors. No transcripts will be published and the inquiry team has repeatedly stated that its role is not to "point fingers" or assign blame.
On today's programme, Niall is joined by Karl Deeter discuss whether that approach goes far enough. After years of lockdowns, vaccine mandates, business closures, travel restrictions and unprecedented limits on personal freedoms, should the inquiry focus on identifying mistakes and holding decision-makers accountable? Or is the real purpose of the inquiry to learn lessons and ensure Ireland is better prepared for the next pandemic?
Niall and Karl examine some of the most controversial aspects of Ireland's Covid response, including restrictions on businesses, school closures, nursing home policies, public health messaging and the economic impact of prolonged lockdowns. They also discuss whether a private inquiry can ever satisfy families, business owners and citizens who feel they deserve answers about decisions that affected every aspect of their lives.
As always, Niall opens the phone lines to hear from listeners. Should the Covid inquiry be about accountability and responsibility, or would a blame game achieve nothing and simply distract from preparing for future crises?
-
Ireland's long-awaited Covid inquiry is finally underway, and already it is raising difficult questions. This week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin faced extensive questioning from the inquiry panel about the Government's handling of the pandemic, but unlike the public inquiries seen in the UK and elsewhere, the interviews are being conducted behind closed doors. No transcripts will be published and the inquiry team has repeatedly stated that its role is not to "point fingers" or assign blame.
On today's programme, Niall is joined by callers to the show discuss whether that approach goes far enough. After years of lockdowns, vaccine mandates, business closures, travel restrictions and unprecedented limits on personal freedoms, should the inquiry focus on identifying mistakes and holding decision-makers accountable? Or is the real purpose of the inquiry to learn lessons and ensure Ireland is better prepared for the next pandemic?
Niall and Karl examine some of the most controversial aspects of Ireland's Covid response, including restrictions on businesses, school closures, nursing home policies, public health messaging and the economic impact of prolonged lockdowns. They also discuss whether a private inquiry can ever satisfy families, business owners and citizens who feel they deserve answers about decisions that affected every aspect of their lives.
As always, Niall opens the phone lines to hear from listeners. Should the Covid inquiry be about accountability and responsibility, or would a blame game achieve nothing and simply distract from preparing for future crises?
WhatsApp your thoughts to 085 100 22 55.
-
Birth rates across Europe and the wider Western world are falling at an unprecedented rate, with many countries now well below the level needed to maintain their populations. Some demographers warn that if current trends continue indefinitely, human populations could shrink dramatically over the coming centuries, raising serious questions about the future of society itself.
On this episode, Niall is joined by David Quinn, founder and spokesperson for the Iona Institute, to discuss why fewer people are having children and whether society is willing to have an honest conversation about the causes. Are young people simply choosing different lifestyles, or have housing costs, economic pressures and uncertainty made starting a family increasingly difficult? Has modern culture devalued marriage, parenthood and family life, or are traditional views being unfairly blamed for a problem driven by economics?
Niall and David also explore the long-term mathematical implications of falling birth rates and ask what happens when each generation is significantly smaller than the one before it. Could ageing populations, labour shortages and declining communities become the defining challenge of the century?
As always, Niall opens the phone lines to hear what listeners think. Are we facing a genuine population crisis, or are concerns about declining birth rates being exaggerated? Is society ignoring uncomfortable truths about family, fertility and demographics because the conversation has become too politically sensitive?
-
On this episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, Niall is joined by social commentator, podcaster and restaurateur Paul Treyvaud for a no-holds-barred discussion on the Government's latest plans to tackle money laundering through luxury retailers.
Under proposals currently being discussed, businesses selling high-end watches, jewellery and designer goods could be encouraged to share information about customers whose spending patterns are deemed suspicious. Supporters argue that organised crime gangs often use luxury goods to launder money and that retailers have a role to play in helping authorities identify criminal activity. Critics, however, say it is yet another example of the State expanding its surveillance powers and treating ordinary citizens like suspects.
Has the Government lost the run of itself? Are we moving towards a society where every large purchase is monitored and every customer is viewed with suspicion? Or is this simply a sensible measure to target criminals and protect the economy?
Paul gives his thoughts on where the line should be drawn between privacy and crime prevention, whether businesses should be expected to police their customers, and why many people are becoming increasingly concerned about growing State intrusion into everyday life.
As always, the conversation doesn't stop there. Paul also shares his views on some of the other stories making headlines this week, from political controversies and government decisions to the issues that are frustrating ordinary people across Ireland.
Expect strong opinions, plenty of laughs, a few rants, and a lively discussion on the stories everyone is talking about.
-
On this episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, Niall is joined by podcaster and commentator Elaine Mullally to discuss a growing trend among modern parents, tracking their children's every move through smartphone apps.
With location-sharing technology now available at the touch of a button, many parents say it offers peace of mind and an extra layer of protection in an increasingly unpredictable world. They argue that knowing where your child is can help keep them safe from online predators, dangerous situations and emergencies.
But critics warn that constant surveillance could be doing more harm than good. They say teenagers need freedom, trust and the opportunity to make their own decisions. Some psychologists have even suggested that excessive monitoring may damage parent-child relationships and prevent young people from developing independence and confidence.
So where should the line be drawn? Do parents have a right to know where their children are at all times, especially when they're still living under their roof? Or is 24-hour phone tracking creating a generation that feels constantly watched and controlled?
Niall and Elaine debate whether tracking apps are a sensible parenting tool or a step too far, before opening the phone lines to hear from listeners with strong opinions on both sides of the argument.
Would you track your teenager's phone? Or would you see it as an invasion of privacy that risks destroying trust between parents and children?
- Visa fler
