Avsnitt

  • Today, Les, John, and special guest Retired General Doug Lute, assess the NATO summit held this week in Ankara, where 32 allied leaders gathered against a backdrop of persistent tensions over burden-sharing, Greenland, and the future of the transatlantic relationship. The summit's communiqué delivered a strong, direct reaffirmation of collective defense, and allied progress on defense spending gave Trump enough reason to leave in relatively good spirits. Yet beneath the surface, fundamental questions about NATO's structure, Europe's growing strategic autonomy, and Washington's reliability remain unresolved.


    Is the Ankara summit a true turning point for the alliance, or a fragile moment of unity held together by personalities and political convenience? Who deserves credit for moving the needle on European defense spending — Trump, Obama, or the threat environment itself? As the U.S. share of global economic power shrinks relative to China and other emerging poles, does NATO's current structure still serve American national security interests? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @johnclipsey

    @lutedoug


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/0QWL4s-vhPI

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Jess, Les, John, and Andrew cover a busy news cycle spanning the skies over Moscow to the streets of America. Ukrainian drones — produced domestically and flying hundreds of miles — are hammering Russian energy infrastructure and forcing Putin to publicly acknowledge fuel shortages across the country for the first time, as air defenses are redeployed from Crimea to protect the capital. 


    Can Ukraine's drone campaign sustain enough pressure to meaningfully shift the strategic calculus for Putin? What does Russia's fuel crisis reveal about the durability of its war machine? ⁨Can the U.S. men’s soccer teams advance to the round of 16 by defeating World War instigators Bosnia and Herzegovina?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @nottvjessjones

    @lestermunson

    @johnclipsey

    @andrewborene


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/-SZp5rCIkAc

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Saknas det avsnitt?

    Klicka här för att uppdatera flödet manuellt.

  • Today, Les, John, Andrew, and Andy examine the devastating earthquake that has killed more than 1,500 people in Venezuela, a number expected to climb, and what the U.S. response reveals about American humanitarian leadership in the Trump era. Washington has committed $150 million in aid flowing through UN agencies and NGOs, with DART teams and fire and rescue units from across the country, including Los Angeles and Fairfax County, already on the ground.


    But the response raises harder questions than it answers. With USAID largely dismantled, who actually leads American disaster response now, and what does that mean for U.S. soft power on the world stage? Now that the U.S. has removed Maduro and installed a friendly government in Caracas, the response carries an unavoidable optic: is Washington showing up for Venezuela because lives are at stake, or because this is now its ally? And if the U.S. is only willing to show up for countries already in its corner, what does that say about the credibility of American humanitarian commitments when the next crisis hits in less friendly territory?

    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @andykeiser

    @johnclipsey

    @andrewborene


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/2_k_PBIlp48

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Jess, Algene, John, and Andrew discuss reports that the Trump administration is considering major defense sales to Turkey, despite bipartisan opposition in Congress. Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in 2019 after purchasing Russia's S-400 air defense system, but as alliance leaders gather in Turkey next month for the NATO Summit, supporters cite its strategic importance to the alliance and recent efforts to distance itself from Moscow.


    Does Turkey's recent westward drift justify relaxing the restrictions imposed after the S-400 purchase? What are real security risks if Russian-made air defense systems and F-35 engines end up in the same arsenal? Can the administration move forward with major defense sales to Turkey on its own, or does Congress have the authority to block the deal?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @nottvjessjones

    @algenesajery

    @johnclipsey

    @andrewborene


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/f3ux1hHjHFE

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Jess, Les, Algene, and John dig into two closely contested elections that could reshape Latin American politics. In Colombia, right-wing candidate Abelardo De La Espriella holds a narrow lead in the presidential runoff, and in Peru, Keiko Fujimori also maintains a razor-thin advantage over leftist Roberto Sánchez as electoral authorities continue reviewing disputed ballots. The team examines what these elections say about security, anti-incumbent sentiment, and the region's broader political trajectory. Plus, John provides an update on the NBA Draft and what it could mean for the Washington Wizards - and the world.


    Is Latin America's rightward shift a reaction to failed incumbents or a true ideological realignment? How does the Trump administration's Monroe Doctrine revival affect the sovereignty and democratic health of these nations?  Will the Wizards’ draft of a star player mean a new era of DC sports?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @nottvjessjones

    @lestermunson

    @algenesajery

    @johnclipsey


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/cYQ23Sbe7HU

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, John, Andrew, Matt, and Amy dig into the ongoing U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations playing out in Switzerland, where a publicly snubbed Vice President and a shifting cast of regional brokers — Qatar and Pakistan prominent among them — signal just how little control Washington holds over the process. The Strait of Hormuz remains a pressure point, with the southern half open only under U.S. military escort and proxy attacks continuing even as diplomats talk. Meanwhile, Keir Starmer's resignation in the UK and a contentious Colombian election add to an already turbulent international backdrop.


    Does the current negotiating posture amount to the U.S. practically begging Iran for a deal, and what does that say about American leverage? With the MOU still existing in multiple competing versions and Iran pressing for Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon as a condition, what would a deal the President can actually enforce even look like? If last July's strikes on Iran's nuclear program were meant to be decisive, why does the situation feel like it hasn't moved at all? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @amykmitchell

    @andrewborene

    @JohnCLipsey

    @wmatthayden


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/WzLCd6MsFHk

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, Amy, John, and Andrew dig into the alleged 14-point memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran. The deal's broad outlines would have Iran maintain the status quo of its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief and unblocking the Strait of Hormuz, with a 300-billion-dollar economic development commitment and a 60-day window to negotiate a final agreement. Critics see it as an economic lifeline for a weakened regime — not a genuine constraint on Iranian ambitions or its network of proxies.


    Can the IRGC be trusted to honor its commitments, or is this a foil to buy time? How does this MOU compare to the JCPOA, and does the changed regional landscape, including Arab mediation and a diminished Iranian military, alter the calculus? Does the deal represent a national security win, or is it a politically convenient off-ramp that trades away American leverage for optics?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @amykmitchell

    @andrewborene

    @JohnCLipsey


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/MHxgZ8L3rOI

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, Jamil, Jess, and John break down the emerging agreement between Washington and Tehran, set to be signed Friday in Geneva under Pakistani auspices. The framework would open 60 days of formal negotiations, with the U.S. lifting its naval blockade in exchange for limitations on Iranian uranium enrichment — though the full text of the MOU has yet to be released. Trump personally called New York Times reporter David Sanger to declare the deal superior to Obama's JCPOA, while praising Xi and Putin for holding the blockade line and publicly pressuring Netanyahu to ease off.


    Can an agreement that reportedly allows limited enrichment after an initial freeze actually improve on the JCPOA's fatal flaw? With JD Vance heading to the signing and figures like Rubio potentially skeptical, how united is the administration behind this deal? Will Iran follow through on opening the Strait of Hormuz when it refused to do so in previous negotiations? And does American willingness to strike Iranian nuclear facilities change the strategic calculus enough to make this deal stick? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @jamil_n_jaffer

    @nottvjessjones

    @JohnCLipsey


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/xzs49CVDZy0

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Jess, John, Les, and Amy examine the fate of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) as it tumbles towards its’ first lapse since 2008. Both chambers have stalled on reauthorization amid disputes over acting DNI Bill Pulte's nomination and a broader debate over whether existing reforms are sufficient to prevent the authority from being turned against American citizens.


    Are the reforms currently on the books enough to protect civil liberties while preserving the counterterrorism capabilities that 702 provides? Is this standoff really about surveillance reform, or is it a proxy fight over personnel and political trust? What do our hosts make of Team USA’s chances in the group stage of the World Cup?

    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @nottvjessjones

    @johnclipsey

    @lestermunson

    @amykmitchell


    Be sure to check out NSI Founder and Executive Director Jamil Jaffer’s coauthored Op-Ed discussing Section 702 here: https://rollcall.com/2026/06/11/turning-down-the-lights-on-us-surveillance-authorities-at-a-time-of-peril/ 


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/LR_imrA7nfM

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, John, and Andy take stock of a North Korea that has used Western distraction to significantly expand its strategic position. Pyongyang reportedly plans to exponentially increase its’ nuclear enrichment capacity with the construction of the new Yongbyon nuclear facility and is undertaking a housing construction boom that allegedly rivals major American cities. Meanwhile, Xi Jinping's recent visit to Pyongyang, which focused heavily on trade rather than denuclearization, signals that Beijing has effectively taken pressure off Kim Jong Un to roll back his weapons program.


    Is the economic development inside North Korea real, and what does it mean for Kim's grip on power? With China sidelining denuclearization and ignoring UN sanctions, how does the U.S. compete against a four-power bloc of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea? Do Moscow and Beijing's deepening friendships with North Korea create friction over who calls the shots in Pyongyang? And with North Korea's missile capabilities increasingly capable of reaching American soil, is now the right moment for Washington to engage, or will U.S. regional partnerships be enough to hold the line?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @johnclipsey

    @andykeiser


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/jVLazDheT9A

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Jess, Jamil, and John break down the latest from the Iran conflict, now nearly 100 days old with no clear end in sight. This weekend Iran launched strikes against Israel following Israeli operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Israel struck back overnight — all while a ceasefire nominally remains in place. Commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz stays suppressed, Iran continues to absorb the economic pain of a U.S. blockade, and Beirut's government grows increasingly hostile to Hezbollah's presence.


    Does Trump have enough influence to prevent military escalation from overwhelming diplomacy? What does a deal over the Strait look like — and how realistic is it? What does a durable U.S.-Iran deal actually look like, and would Israel accept it?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @nottvjessjones

    @jamil_n_jaffer

    @johnclipsey


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/afTXQKm2mg4

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Jess, Algene, and Matt examine the Trump administration's latest tariffs on imports from 60 countries, including China, the EU, Canada, and the UK, imposed under a new legal framework targeting failures to combat forced labor in global supply chains. The move follows the Supreme Court's rejection of the administration's earlier tariffs, which were imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), and raises broader questions about the intersection of trade policy, national security, and strategic competition with China.


    How does the administration's new tariff authority differ from the IEEPA-based approach rejected by the Supreme Court? Does the administration's new forced-labor rationale represent a legitimate trade concern or a more durable legal pathway for maintaining tariffs? Can the U.S. pressure China economically without alienating its allies?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @nottvjessjones

    @algenesajery

    @wmatthayden


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/gN9NH0Fmbt0

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, John, Andy, Andrew, and Matt break down the new AI Executive Order, which dropped yesterday after weeks of interagency debate and a last-minute halt before its original signing ceremony. The order tasks DHS with facilitating AI tool access for federal and state agencies, puts Treasury in charge of a new AI clearinghouse, and establishes a 30-day federal review window before models are released to selected partners — a framework that effectively brings AI companies into a formal government assessment process for the first time. This comes on the heels of Anthropic's Mythos model release and early discussions about a potential AI dialogue between the United States and China.


    Is the framework voluntary in name only? What does it mean that Treasury, rather than DHS or CISA alone, is at the center of this? How does the U.S. approach compare to the tiered review frameworks already in place across Five Eyes partners like the UK and Australia? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @johnclipsey

    @andykeiser

    @andrewborene

    @wmatthayden


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/r-JLI9kup0E

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, John, Amy, Algene, and Andy break down Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's address at the Shangri-La Dialogue, where he outlined the administration's strategy for the Indo-Pacific. Hegseth struck a softer tone than last year, framing U.S. alliances around shared interests rather than shared values, emphasizing hard power deterrence along the island chain, and calling for greater burden sharing among partners, while declining to mention Taiwan by name. Does the speech signal a potentially dramatic shift in how Washington approaches Beijing, with some analysts warning it cedes significant ground after years of a tougher posture?


    Does reframing alliances around interests rather than values weaken the credibility of U.S. commitments in the region? Is Japan's nascent domestic intelligence agency an indication that the burden-sharing message is landing with partners? With a $14 billion arms package to Taiwan reportedly being used as a bargaining chip with Xi, what does Hegseth’s emphasis on hard power and ally burden sharing fall flat? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @johnclipsey

    @andykeiser

    @amykmitchell

    @algenesajery


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/pfnnvW3T0mA

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, Algene, and John dig into the murky details of a reported Memorandum of Understanding between U.S. and Iran— a document that Iran refutes, hasn't been signed by Trump, and hasn't actually been seen by the public. A controlled leak to Axios attempting to outline the MOU's terms — including sanctions waivers, a 60-day ceasefire, and reopening of the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days — quickly unraveled, with Rubio, multiple news outlets, and Iranian officials all offering contradictory versions. Meanwhile, the White House communications operation is visibly struggling, leaving the impression that Tehran, not Washington, is controlling the narrative.


    What is actually in this MOU, and does anyone in a position of authority on either side truly know? If the JCPOA took two years to negotiate under the Obama administration, is it an indicator of success that this admin is producing framework agreements after just two months? Would reopening the Strait of Hormuz constitute a genuine strategic victory, or does it paper over a war that has drifted without clear objectives or an exit strategy? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @algenesajery

    @johnclipsey


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/t-EyP5czv1U

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, Algene, Andy, and John mark Fault Lines' 600th episode by returning to one of the show's defining subjects — Iran — as a proposed deal reportedly nears completion even as the two countries exchange fire. The Trump administration wants out of the conflict, and while Iran's missile and nuclear programs have been degraded, the Supreme Leader is publicly committed to perpetual conflict with Israel and the United States. From Jimmy Carter to today, Tehran has confounded nearly every American president who has tried to manage it.


    Is a deal worth striking if the underlying strategic problem of Iran’s uranium enrichment problem remains unresolved? With Iran's missile threat still constraining U.S. freedom of operation in the region, are American allies any safer than they were before the strikes began? Does a 60-day extension simply give Iran the breathing room it needs to reconstitute? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @algenesajery

    @andykeiser

    @johnclipsey


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/WMD2ZmgnWUE

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, Jess, and Morgan break down the latest developments in Iran as diplomatic and political pressure mounts on multiple fronts. Netanyahu has reportedly expressed frustration with Trump's negotiating tactics, while the administration may have been weighing a role for deeply unpopular former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a post-strike political transition. With oil shortages already hitting American wallets, the economic and political costs of the midterms are proving impossible to separate.


    Can any diplomatic framework that leaves Iran's nuclear program intact actually hold, given Tehran's track record of defying agreements? With midterm elections on the horizon and no clear endgame in sight, will domestic political pressure change Trump's calculus? Iran is not Venezuela, so why does it seem like Washington is running the same playbook, and how long can Tehran afford to wait the U.S. out? 


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @nottvjessjones

    @morganlroach


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/GrVYNhi1PW4

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Jess, Algene, Matt, and Marc examine the rapidly escalating Ebola outbreak in Central Africa, where a rare strain has already killed an estimated 131 people across roughly 500 suspected cases. The World Health Organization has declared an international public health emergency, and unlike previous Ebola outbreaks, this Bundibugyo strain has no approved vaccine or targeted treatment. The outbreak is unfolding in a volatile region marked by conflict, weak healthcare infrastructure, and extensive cross-border movement, while the CDC has already begun enhanced airport screening amid fears the outbreak could spread further.


    Why are Ebola outbreaks now viewed not just as humanitarian crises, but as national security events? Can the United States mount the kind of coordinated global response that helped contain prior outbreaks? And what does this crisis reveal about the growing intersection of biosecurity, geopolitics, and global instability?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @nottvjessjones

    @wmatthayden

    @algenesajery

    @washingtonflack


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/grv78ZSIvXE

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Les, Jess, and Amy dig into the political turbulence rattling the United Kingdom and Europe's broader leadership landscape. Rumors over the weekend that Prime Minister Keir Starmer would resign proved unfounded — he has confirmed he is staying — but the episode surrounding his potential departure exposed deep fractures in British politics. Labour suffered significant losses in local elections to the Greens, the Conservatives were hammered by Reform, and a large Unite the Kingdom rally highlighted simmering discontent over immigration, the economy, and the direction of the country.


    Is Starmer's grip on power strong enough to survive until 2029, or is the denial of resignation simply delaying the inevitable? What do the electoral surges of Reform and the Greens reveal about the fracturing of Britain's traditional political coalitions? How much of Europe's economic stagnation can be traced to structural choices in social spending and labor policy and will leaders finally be forced to reckon with that?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @lestermunson

    @nottvjessjones

    @amykmitchell


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/08Qnhk_Pr54

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  • Today, Morgan, John, Amy, and Matt break down President Trump's travel to China and what it signals about the trajectory of the world's most consequential bilateral relationship. The visit produced visible wins on trade, including Chinese commitments to purchase American oil and an agreement that the Strait of Hormuz should remain open but Chinese state media has been conspicuously silent on the deals Trump has touted publicly. Xi's invocation of the Thucydides Trap, referencing the Peloponnesian War and competing powers in the context of Taiwan, set a striking backdrop for a visit the administration framed primarily around economic cooperation.


    Was this a diplomatic breakthrough or a carefully managed photo opportunity that Beijing will leverage as it sees fit? How should we interpret the gap between Trump's transactional framing and Xi's pointed messaging about regional stability and power transitions? Are the national security gains from this trip real, or are they downstream consequences of economic agreements that haven't fully materialized yet?


    Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.


    @morganlroach

    @wmatthayden

    @amykmitchell

    @johnclipsey


    Like what we're doing here? 


    Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. 


    And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!


    We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/r0__U8Iheig

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.