Avsnitt
-
The emergence of a web of scam compounds in Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos is not just an issue for Mekong countries. The criminal syndicates that operate from these compounds are estimated to steal over US$43.8 billion from Mekong countries every year and conduct their financial and administrative operations in other Southeast Asian countries. This poses a series of challenges for the United States. American citizens lost an estimated US$3.5 billion in 2023 to scam actors in Southeast Asia; more broadly, these criminal syndicates weaken state authority in Southeast Asia and make it more challenging for Washington to promote its strategic interests. Join us for a conversation with Alvin Camba, Assistant Professor at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver, and faculty affiliate at the Climate Policy Lab at the Fletcher School at Tufts University, to discuss this important topic.
-
As the civil conflict in Myanmar rages on, there are ongoing questions about how regional actors such as ASEAN and the United States should calibrate their responses to the crisis. In particular, is there a practical case for the value of democracy for global interests such as peace, security and development? How are these efforts being received in Southeast Asia? Join us for a conversation with Ambassador Derek Mitchell, non-resident senior advisor to the Office of the President and the Asia Program at CSIS, to discuss this important topic.
-
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
As U.S.-China competition heats up in the field of technology, Southeast Asian economies find themselves in a unique position with both benefits and risks. Investments have poured into the region from multiple parties, seeking to take advantage of factors such as mineral wealth and low labour costs to manufacture crucial components for EV supply chains. However, there are geopolitical risks that must be managed as well. Join us as we speak with Dr Cung Vu, Visiting Senior Fellow at RSIS and former-Associate Director of the Office of Naval Research Global and Chief Science and Technology Adviser of the National Maritime Intelligence-Integration Office, US Department of the Navy, on this important topic.
-
From Europe to the Middle East, numerous crises have emerged during the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden. This has fuelled debates over whether the U.S. has the capacity to address all of them at once – or, as some have argued, whether the U.S. should prioritise its interests and pick its fights more carefully. Join us as we speak with Stephen Wertheim, Senior Fellow in the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, on this important strategic issue.
-
The April 2024 trilateral summit between the U.S., Japan and the Philippines was closely watched by regional observers. The Philippines, which has weathered increasing assertiveness from China, signed an agreement to maintain security and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. The U.S., meanwhile, is moving to integrate its defence industrial base with that of Japan, with a plan to use Japanese shipyards to repair U.S. warships. What do these developments mean for maritime security in the region? Tune in to hear Dr. Collin Koh, Senior Fellow at RSIS, share his views.
-
As Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell recently described, the U.S. alliance with Japan is the “cornerstone of [U.S.] engagement in the Indo-Pacific.” This statement was underscored by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s state visit to Washington in April 2024, outlining 70 agreements in areas ranging from defence to space and even culture at a press conference with U.S. President Joe Biden. How significant was this visit, and what are the limits of the U.S.-Japan relationship? Tune in to hear Associate Professor Bhubhindar Singh from RSIS offer his views on this important topic.
-
Here at the U.S. Programme in IDSS, RSIS, we monitor topics ranging from tech to U.S. economic policy. We also write about it too, with Adrian Ang (Coordinator, USP) and Kevin Chen (Associate Research Fellow, USP) recently writing Op-Eds on the TikTok bill and U.S. economic policy in Southeast Asia respectively. Tune in to hear them give a quick rundown on their Op-Eds.
Adrian's Op-Ed: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/ip24033-the-us-tiktok-ban-larger-yards-and-higher-fences/
Kevin's Op-Ed: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/ip24035-exploring-waning-us-economic-influence-in-asean-despite-high-levels-of-fdi/
-
Based on data from numerous news and polling agencies, all signs point to Prabowo Subianto being the likely winner of Indonesia’s 2024 Presidential election. Amid questions about the composition of his government and the policies he will prioritise while in office, an important consideration is what he will bring to the foreign policy table.
Prabowo’s election manifesto underlined climate change, the conflicts in Ukraine and Palestine, and potential armed conflicts with China in the South China Sea as some of the key strategic challenges facing Indonesia. He is expected to be more engaged in foreign policy as compared to his predecessor, Joko Widodo, though he claims to share his predecessor’s goal of eradicating poverty. It will be interesting to see how he will influence Indonesia’s responses to the AUKUS pact, Indonesia’s recently-signed Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with the U.S., and Indonesia’s path amid geopolitical competition between the U.S. and China.
-
On 13 January 2024, Taiwan voters elected Lai Ching-te as their president, keeping the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in power for a third straight term. The election had been deemed as a crucial signal for Cross-Strait Relations for the next four years, with Beijing ominously framing it as a choice between “peace and war, prosperity and decline.”
There are concerns about how Beijing will respond to Lai’s victory, given how they repeatedly labeled him as a “stubborn worker for Taiwan independence”. On the other hand, Washington was quick to congratulate Lai, though President Joe Biden took pains to highlight that the US does not support Taiwan’s independence.
It will be important to see what the results of this election mean for Cross-Strait Relations and the fragile détente between Washington and Beijing. Given Southeast Asia’s proximity and economic ties to both sides of the Strait, it will also be important to gauge their response to these developments.
-
As part of our efforts to better understand global security and political developments, RSIS regularly embarks on study trips to meet with and maintain close ties with fellow think tanks and agencies. One such trip was made to Washington, D.C., in early November 2023, where we met with experts from the Centre for Naval Analyses, Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Stimson Centre, American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, Wilson Centre, and the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS).
The prospect of a meeting between U.S. President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping was a popular topic of discussion. We also discussed a range of other topics, including U.S.-China competition, China’s economic slowdown, the direction and coherence of U.S. policy on Southeast Asia and the implications of the Israel-Palestine War on U.S. foreign policy. Join us for this short episode as Dr. Sinderpal Singh, the head of the RSIS delegation, shares his thoughts about our research trip to D.C.
-
The United States and Myanmar have a long and storied history of bilateral ties. 10 years ago, ties appeared to be on the mend, with visits to the country by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama followed by the easing of sanctions. In recent years, however, the relationship has been defined by two crises: the Rohingya Crisis that erupted in 2017, and the February 2021 Coup that deposed the democratically elected members of the country’s ruling party, the National League for Democracy (NLD). In response to the crises, the U.S. doubled down on targeted sanctions against Myanmar officials. President Joe Biden’s administration has also made it clear that it does not recognise Myanmar’s current regime, and even downgraded its ties in December 2022 by not replacing the then-incumbent ambassador.
The prospects for a rapprochement between Washington and Naypyidaw seem dim. However, from online social movements in support of the anti-junta forces to U.S. support for ASEAN’s position on the Myanmar crisis, there are many interesting elements of the relationship to discuss. Join us for this exciting episode of Engaging the Eagle as we delve into these issues.
-
China’s digital footprint has been expanding rapidly in Latin America in the last two decades. Neither the U.S.-China tech war nor the U.S.-led global campaign aimed at Chinese tech firms seemed to be able to reverse the trend. Much of the policy discussion in the western media surrounding China’s digital expansion focuses on the supply side, emphasizing the potential risks of adopting Chinese technologies. Yet there remains scant research on the demand side—namely, how policymakers in developing countries perceive Chinese tech firms and how they maneuver amid the intensifying rivalry between the U.S. and China.
Why did Chinese tech firms become key telecommunication equipment providers for Latin America despite geopolitical headwinds? To shed light on the issue, Dr. Jin (Julie) Zeng examines local stakeholders’ perceptions of Chinese tech firms and their choices between development and national security. Using Brazil as a case study, she argues that corporate strategies (emphasizing quality, prices, services, and financing), as well as the pragmatic approaches of regulators and internet service providers (ISPs) enable Chinese tech firms to expand market shares in Brazil. Instead of securitizing Chinese technologies, Brazilian regulators and ISPs have been eager to bridge the digital divide and benefit from the fierce competition among global tech firms.
-
On October 1, the U.S. government narrowly avoided a government shutdown by passing a continuing resolution, a type of stopgap spending bill that funds federal agencies at 2022 levels for 45 days. The U.S. is one of the few political systems in the world in which federal agencies cannot spend or obligate any money without an appropriation or approval from Congress – in other words, if Congress fails to pass 12 annual appropriation bills, the government will shut down, as it has 10 times over the past 4 decades. Yet the danger is not past yet. There are concerns that the gesture may only have delayed an inevitable shutdown, especially after Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-California) was ousted from his role as House Speaker. Moreover, the glaring absence of aid for Ukraine in the continuing resolution has raised worries about the U.S. commitment to the country, and about U.S. foreign policy at large as Washington continues to be beset by domestic woes.
-
U.S.-ASEAN ties have been in the spotlight since news emerged that U.S. President Joe Biden would not be attending the 43rd ASEAN Summit in Jakarta. While the U.S. has repeatedly affirmed in strategic documents and public statements alike that it supports ASEAN centrality, the absence of its Chief Executive at the grouping’s main Summit casts a pall over its approach to the region. In fact, given how Washington seems to be advancing its ties with individual ASEAN states such as Vietnam and the Philippines instead of the overall grouping, there are questions about Washington’s commitment and approach to ASEAN, especially as it enters an election year in 2024.
Join us as we discuss the state of U.S.-ASEAN ties in this episode. Beyond discussing developments during the ASEAN Summit, we will also cover the mutual frustrations of the two parties, ASEAN’s response to great power competition, and the prospects for U.S.-ASEAN ties as we go into 2024.
-
Singapore, the tiny island-state in Southeast Asia, has a close relationship with the United States. Singapore is Washington’s largest trade partner in Southeast Asia, while Washington is the republic’s largest foreign investor. The two also share close security ties, with US forces allowed to access Singapore’s air and naval bases on a rotational basis since 1990. The two are frequent participants in joint exercises and are also exploring cooperation in emerging and novel areas such as cybersecurity and blockchain payments.
The strength of the US-Singapore relationship is beyond doubt – however, a more interesting question concerns the limits and future of this relationship. While Singapore has benefitted greatly from the US-led international order, it is also a close partner with China, and its leaders have increasingly warned of the dire implications of disruptive trends such as decoupling between the US and China. As tensions rise, it is unclear how Singapore will adjust its approach to its ties with Washington and Beijing.
-
After the U.S. pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) was styled as the new anchor of U.S. trade policy in the region, with the lofty ambition of establishing the “rules of the road” for regional trade. For the most part, however, it has yet to match this ambition with substance. Beyond a supply chain agreement and an agreement to launch a framework for cooperating on hydrogen technologies, IPEF has yet to provide concrete deliverables for its members.
Some observers have noted that IPEF is not a traditional trade deal and should not be judged like one. However, the fact remains that without a new economic anchor, Washington risks ceding its leadership on trade issues and over-securitising its relationship with regional governments. Even as Washington expresses hope that a broader deal will be announced at the APEC summit in November, the stakes remain high.
-
The Shangri-La Dialogue (SLD) is a track 1 intergovernmental security conference held in Singapore that gathers participants from across the region to discuss issues such as U.S. leadership in the Indo-Pacific. Though U.S. Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin did not meet Chinese Defence Minister Gen. Li Shangfu for substantive discussions, concerns about the relationship between Washington and Beijing underpinned every session. Whether during the respective addresses by Secretary Austin and Gen. Li, or during sessions on resolving regional tensions and assessing Asia’s evolving maritime security order, participants explored how this rivalry would shape the future of the region. Join us for this short episode as we explore what happened at this year’s SLD.
-
When the Republican Party took control of the U.S. House of Representatives following the 2022 midterm elections, many observers expected the Republican Party and the White House to engage in a showdown over the debt ceiling. Beyond economic fallout and damage to U.S. prestige in Asia, a default could also have had serious consequences for Washington’s ability to commit to its foreign policy-related expenditures. Now that the dust from the crisis is settling, it’s a good time to break down the bipartisan budget agreement struck between President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to understand what it included, how it compares to previous deals struck by President Barack Obama, and how it could affect U.S. foreign policy in Asia.
-
As geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing increase, Washington’s credibility as a security presence and partner in Asia is under scrutiny. A hawkish stance that promotes military deployments would raise questions about Washington’s willingness to commit to a potential war in Asia. Converse, a dovish approach that cedes parts of Asia to China’s sphere of influence would severely damage Washington’s credibility with its allies. Finding a middle ground between these two credibility issues will be an important objective for U.S. strategy in the region. Join us for this short episode as we discuss this credibility problem for the U.S. in Asia and what it means for the U.S. approach to the region.
-
Security and foreign policy observers in Southeast Asia have been abuzz about announcements surrounding the Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) trilateral defence agreement, but reactions in Southeast Asia have been mixed. Some observers have fretted over the agreement auguring an Asian version of the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance (NATO), while others have expressed concerns about the agreement triggering a nuclear arms race in the region. Above all, there are unanswered questions about what this agreement means for regional stability, and how it dovetails with the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy.
Join us for this short episode as we explore the details of this grouping, its role amid the broader U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy and how Southeast Asian countries are responding to the news.
- Visa fler