Avsnitt
-
The Recruitment Dilemma
We've all been there—sending out countless job applications, only to receive a few impersonal responses. The reality of modern job searching has become a numbers game, one that is far from human-friendly. The recruitment process today often feels like a relentless cycle of applying, interviewing, and receiving feedback that leaves us feeling undervalued and disrespected.
It seems like every step of the job search has been designed to make us feel like just another number. From the automated systems that filter our resumes to the anonymous feedback we receive (often from a no-reply email), the process feels anything but personal. The experience is undeniably frustrating and raises the question: why has recruitment become so disrespectful?
The Numbers Game
Let's talk about the sheer volume of applications required to land an interview. We're often forced to send out hundreds, if not thousands, of applications just to get a handful of responses. The numbers game is disheartening, forcing us to question if anyone is even reading our resumes. More often than not, it feels like we're being filtered by algorithms rather than assessed by actual human beings.
Even when we do get called in for an interview, the responses we receive are frequently impersonal. Feedback, if we receive any at all, is often generic and sent from no-reply email addresses. This lack of personal touch makes the entire process even more grueling, leaving us to wonder why there is so much disrespect inherent in how recruitment is handled today.
Salary Expectation as a Form of Gatekeeping
Another thorny issue in the recruitment process is the salary expectation field. We are often asked to state our salary expectations right from the get-go, a practice that feels more like gambling than professional negotiation. It's like throwing a dart in the dark, hoping it lands within the employer's hidden target range.
Wouldn't it be more straightforward if employers disclosed their salary ranges upfront? This would eliminate the guesswork and allow us to focus on showcasing our skills and competence. By making salary ranges transparent, companies could foster a more respectful and equitable recruitment process. Yet, this level of transparency is often avoided, possibly to maintain internal salary structures or to avoid unsettling current employees.
The Disrespect of No-Reply Emails
The use of no-reply emails is another glaring example of the disrespect embedded in the recruitment process. Receiving a rejection email from a no-reply address feels like a digital middle finger. It's a one-sided conversation where we have no chance to ask questions, seek feedback, or even clarify misunderstandings.
Constructive feedback is invaluable. It helps us understand where we went wrong and how we can improve for future opportunities. Yet, more often than not, the feedback we receive is either non-existent or so generic that it offers no real value. This approach not only wastes our time but also leaves us feeling disrespected and undervalued.
The Role of Algorithms in Recruitment
The advent of algorithm-driven Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) was initially seen as a boon for HR departments overwhelmed by the sheer volume of applications. However, these systems have quickly become a barrier between candidates and potential employers. We are often forced to tailor our resumes to fit the specific keywords used by these systems, reducing our professional experiences to mere buzzwords.
While the efficiency of algorithms can't be denied, they lack the human touch that can truly assess a candidate’s potential. A resume that doesn't tick all the algorithmic boxes may still belong to a highly qualified individual. By relying too heavily on these systems, companies may be missing out on great talent and perpetuating a cycle of disrespect.
The Reality of Misleading Job Descriptions
Have you ever landed a job only to find out that the role is nothing like what was advertised? This bait-and-switch tactic is another form of disrespect that undermines the recruitment process. Misleading job descriptions can result in roles that require more travel than expected or are less remote-friendly than initially stated.
Honesty in job descriptions is crucial for setting the right expectations. When companies paint an overly rosy picture of a role, only to reveal the harsh reality after hiring, it creates a toxic work environment right from the start. This dishonesty is not only disrespectful but also counterproductive, leading to high turnover rates and low employee morale.
Addressing Disrespect in Recruitment
So, what can we do to combat this disrespect? One approach is to always ask for feedback, even if the initial response comes from a no-reply email. If we can't get a direct answer, perhaps we should consider reaching out to hiring managers directly. This proactive approach can sometimes yield the constructive criticism we need to improve.
Another potential solution is the creation of candidate-focused employment agencies—agencies that represent us, the job seekers, rather than the employers. These agencies could function like boutique real estate firms, offering personalized services and ensuring that our interests are at the forefront of the recruitment process.
The Illusion of Ghost Jobs
Ghost jobs—positions that remain perpetually open and are never actually filled—serve as another frustrating aspect of job hunting. These phantom listings clutter job boards and waste our time and energy. Often, these positions exist solely for compliance reasons, allowing companies to appear as though they are hiring when in reality, they are not.
We must hold companies accountable for these ghost jobs. By calling out this practice, we can push for more honest and transparent hiring processes. Only then can we hope to eliminate this form of disrespect from the recruitment landscape.
The Role of Candidate Advocacy
In the face of such systemic issues, advocacy becomes crucial. We need more platforms and voices to speak up about the disrespect in recruitment. Social media, professional networks, and even podcasts like ours can serve as powerful tools for change. By sharing our experiences and demanding better treatment, we can start to shift the narrative.
Collective action can drive meaningful change. By joining forces and voicing our concerns, we can put pressure on companies to improve their recruitment practices. Whether it's through online petitions, public reviews, or organized campaigns, our collective voice can make a difference.
The Path Forward?
The disrespect ingrained in the recruitment process is a multifaceted issue that requires a concerted effort to address. From the over-reliance on algorithms to the use of impersonal no-reply emails, every aspect of the job search experience needs to be reevaluated.
As job seekers, we must demand more transparency, respect, and honesty from employers. By advocating for better practices and supporting candidate-focused initiatives, we can pave the way for a more respectful and equitable recruitment process.
In the meantime, perhaps the best advice we can offer is to consider alternative paths. If the traditional job search feels like an endless cycle of disrespect, maybe it's time to explore entrepreneurship or other avenues where our skills and talents are genuinely valued.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
In our digital age, the choices we make about technology are not just personal preferences; they're statements about how we want to live our lives. As digital minimalists, we often find ourselves at odds with the prevailing tech culture.
The WhatsApp Dilemma
In this episode of the podcast, we dive into the complexities of using WhatsApp for parental communication in schools and extracurricular activities. It's a reflection of a broader issue: how technology, designed to connect us, often ends up creating divides. We're not just talking about a messaging app; we're discussing a cultural shift in communication, where the choice of platform can lead to inclusion or exclusion.
In our personal experience, we've felt the sting of being left out because we chose not to use WhatsApp. Our decision, rooted in a desire for simplicity and a wariness of data manipulation, meant missing out on vital information about our children's activities.
This isn't just about missing a message; it's about being sidelined in a community that's supposed to be inclusive.
The Culture of Convenience
The convenience of WhatsApp has made it the go-to choice for many parent groups. But this convenience comes at a cost. It's not just about data privacy; it's about how we want to communicate. WhatsApp's format, favoring quick, often superficial interactions, can bury important information under a mountain of emojis and small talk. This isn't effective communication; it's noise.
We understand the appeal of WhatsApp's speed and simplicity. But when it becomes the only channel of communication, it excludes those who, for various reasons, choose not to use it. It's a form of digital coercion, where participation in community life is contingent on using a specific app. This isn't just inconvenient; it's fundamentally unfair.
Seeking Solutions
So, what's the solution? We believe it's about finding a balance that respects everyone's preferences and privacy.
Schools and activity groups should not rely solely on a single platform, especially one that raises concerns about data privacy and user manipulation. Instead, we advocate for a more inclusive approach, using universally accessible channels like email or SMS.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
In a world increasingly dominated by digital interactions, our story with our daughter and her Punkt MP02 phone offers a microcosm of the larger conversation about communication in the age of smartphones. As parents, we initially thought that providing a basic phone would strike the perfect balance between connectivity and independence. However, we soon discovered that the challenge was far more nuanced, revolving not just around the device itself, but its usage and the digital etiquette it entails.
Navigating the Digital Landscape
Our daughter's experience with her simple phone quickly revealed a paradox. While we aimed to limit her digital exposure, the flood of text messages from her peers suggested that the type of device was just the first choice to make. The issue was not the technology but the behavior surrounding it. This led us to a crucial realization: it's essential to teach our children the principles of responsible digital communication.
As we delved deeper into this issue, we noticed a pattern that extended beyond our family. The constant connectivity afforded by digital devices has blurred the lines between personal time and digital availability. This trend prompted us to reassess our digital habits, realizing that our behavior sets a precedent for our daughter.
The Impact of Our Digital Footprint
Our journey into the world of digital pragmatism highlighted the significance of our digital footprint, not just as individuals but as a family. We recognized that our daughter's digital interactions were not occurring in a vacuum; they were influenced by the behaviors she observed in us and her peers. This insight led to a broader discussion about the role of parents in shaping digital behaviors and the importance of setting an example.
The Ripple Effect of Digital Communication
As we grappled with these challenges, we realized that the issue of digital communication extends beyond individual families. It's a societal issue that requires a collective effort to address. The ripple effect of our digital interactions is profound, influencing not just our immediate circle but the broader community.
Modeling Responsible Digital Behavior
Our experience taught us the importance of modeling responsible digital behavior. As parents, we have a responsibility to demonstrate healthy digital habits, showing our children that there's a time and place for digital communication. This involves not just limiting screen time but also showcasing how to interact digitally in a respectful and mindful manner.
The Role of Education in Digital Etiquette
The conversation about digital communication shouldn't be limited to the home. It's imperative that schools and educational institutions play a role in teaching digital etiquette. Incorporating lessons on digital boundaries and responsible use of technology into the curriculum can provide children with the tools they need to navigate the digital world effectively.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
Human interaction with AI did not start with ChatGPT. It started years earlier, on social media: all the timelines (or newsfeeds) on social media nowadays are curated using complex AI and machine-learning algorithms.
Today, we know it: social media - an intricate experiment, a playground for AI to manipulate our choices, stir emotions, and shape our perceptions - is not beneficial for humanity. End of story.
It's unsettling to realize that this experiment's results have manifested as:
* polarized societies,
* the erosion of democracy, and
* vulnerable teenage minds.
The power and danger of AI lie not just in the technology itself, but in how it's wielded.
Mindful Engagement
While AI's rapid progress may seem insurmountable, the first step towards a better future is awareness. Acknowledging the potential harm to our mental well-being, especially in teenagers, is essential. Our attention is currency, and we must be deliberate in how we spend it online. Skepticism about AI-generated content is wise, but let's not forget the responsibility we bear in engaging thoughtfully.
Unmasking the Manipulators
The threats AI and social media pose extend far beyond their current forms. With deepfake technology and AI influencers entering the scene, we face an onslaught of disinformation and manipulation. The very fabric of reality becomes questionable. Remember, anyone can distort the truth or impersonate, highlighting the urgency to discern facts from fabrications.
Claiming Our Identity
The peril of AI chatbots befriending our children goes beyond our comprehension. These digital companions, while seemingly friendly, can subtly erode identities and beliefs. The heart of the issue is the mismatch of intentions. AI is not here to nurture personal growth; its motivations are dictated by algorithms, not empathy. To safeguard our children's future, we must guard them against AI-fueled friendships.
The Perils of Passivity
Our current predicament isn't solely a result of AI's relentless march; it's rooted in our collective passivity. Social media's toxic elements thrive because we allow them to. It's high time we recognize that our actions matter. By holding platforms accountable and supporting regulatory efforts, we can ensure the virtual spaces we inhabit reflect our values and aspirations.
A Glimpse of Accountability
As we wrestle with the ethical quagmire, experts like Eric Schmidt and Jonathan Haidt emerge as voices of reason. Their calls for transparency, content labeling, and regulation reflect the urgency of the situation. By making platforms liable for their content and design choices, we instigate a shift towards a safer digital environment.
A New Age of Maturity
Raising the age of digital adulthood resonates as a potential solution. Just as we limit alcohol consumption to safeguard vulnerable young minds, extending the age of social media access could provide the buffer needed for healthier digital interactions. A fundamental shift in how we view these platforms is essential – from frivolous amusement to serious responsibility.
Empowerment through Choice
In our quest to master AI-augmented social media, we must remember that despite AI's increasing influence, our choices remain paramount. We can't control the technology's rapid evolution, but we can control how we engage with it. The future isn't predetermined; it's shaped by our collective actions and decisions.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
Are you wondering when the best time is to give your child a smartphone? You're not alone. Many parents struggle with this decision, and today, we want to discuss an organization called "Wait Until 8th" that has a powerful suggestion for parents: wait until your child is at least 14 years old before giving them a smartphone.
Why 14? According to the organization and psychologist Jonathan Haidt, waiting until the end of puberty is crucial for a child's mental health. During puberty, children have a strong need to fit in and are constantly checking in with their peers. Introducing a smartphone during this time can lead to negative effects on their mental health, as they are exposed to powerful algorithms that can provide enraging or harmful content.
Even adults can struggle with the impact of smartphones and social media on their mental health. So, if it's difficult for grown-ups, imagine how much harder it is for children going through puberty. This is why some experts, like Haidt, believe that waiting until the end of puberty is essential.
However, some people argue that even 14 might be too young. They suggest waiting until a child is 21 or even avoiding smartphones altogether. So, what are the benefits of giving your child a smartphone at 14 or 15? Honestly, it's hard to say. Some may argue that it could help them become an Instagram influencer or provide useful apps for traveling, but these benefits can be achieved through other devices that are not as addictive as smartphones.
The idea behind "Wait Until 8th" is not only about delaying smartphone usage but also about creating a community of parents who support each other in this decision. By signing the online pledge and connecting with other parents from your child's school, you can form a supportive network that ensures your child won't be the only one without a smartphone.
Recent studies have shown that the earlier a child receives a smartphone, the worse their mental health may be later in life. This means that waiting as long as possible before giving your child a smartphone is indeed a wise decision.
As a parent, one of the best gifts you can give your child is good mental health. If their mental health is strong, they will be better equipped to handle conflicts, develop self-esteem, and navigate the ever-changing world.
In conclusion, the "Wait Until 8th" organization suggests waiting until your child is at least 14 before giving them a smartphone. However, some believe that waiting even longer or avoiding smartphones altogether is the best approach. Ultimately, the decision is up to you as a parent, but it's essential to consider the potential impact on your child's mental health and well-being.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
We've noticed a significant shift in the way children are raised and allowed to interact with their environment. Gone are the days when kids could roam the neighborhood freely, exploring and learning from their surroundings without constant supervision. In this article, we will discuss the importance of allowing children to play freely and the consequences of overprotecting them.
As parents and caregivers, it's natural to want to keep our children safe. However, in our quest for safety, we may be limiting their opportunities for growth and development. When we were younger, we spent countless hours playing with our friends, with minimal adult supervision. Our parents had a general idea of where we were, but they didn't have the constant access to our whereabouts that today's technology provides.
One of the reasons for this shift in parenting is the influence of media. We are bombarded with stories of terrible things happening to children, which fuels our fear and leads us to overprotect our kids. This overprotection may actually be doing more harm than good, as it prevents them from developing essential life skills such as self-confidence, competence, and independence.
A key example of this issue is the story of Lenore Skenazy, who wrote the book "Free Range Kids" after letting her eight-year-old son ride the subway alone in New York City. Skenazy argues that we should make more efforts to let our kids be independent, as our minds are conditioned to focus on negative information rather than positive experiences.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
The platform is the message
One important aspect of our media consumption is understanding that the platform is the message. Different platforms offer different experiences, and it's crucial to be aware of how these platforms shape the content we consume. For example, Twitter is designed for short, snappy messages, while TikTok focuses on brief videos. By recognizing the nature of each platform, we can better tailor our media consumption to our needs and preferences.
Media-mix choice
Our family has made a conscious decision to avoid certain forms of media, such as TV, radio, and streaming services. We believe that these platforms are often vehicles for advertisements and news, which can be overwhelming and distracting. Instead, we prefer to make our own decisions about what to buy and what to pay attention to, based on our needs and analysis.
The rule of effort
We also employ a strategy called the "rule of effort," which involves consuming media that requires a significant amount of effort from its creators. For example, we prefer to listen to audiobooks over podcasts, as the former requires more effort to write and record. Similarly, we choose movies over series, as they generally require more effort to produce and offer a complete story with a beginning, middle, and end.
A mindful experience
Our media consumption choices extend to the formats we use. For music, we prefer vinyl records and CDs, while for movies, we opt for DVDs. We find that these formats require more effort to enjoy, making the experience more intentional and meaningful. For example, listening to a vinyl record involves taking it out of its sleeve, placing it on the turntable, and carefully positioning the needle, all of which contribute to a more immersive and mindful experience.
What media do we consume?
When it comes to watching movies, we avoid streaming services and instead choose DVDs. This allows us to have control over our movie selection, without being influenced by algorithms or suggestions. We find that this approach leads to less time spent scrolling through options and more time enjoying the movies we truly want to watch.
Shaping the environment
Our environment plays a significant role in shaping our media consumption habits. By creating a space that encourages intentional media consumption, we can better focus on the quality of our experiences. For example, we use a projector to watch movies, providing a more immersive and theater-like experience.
Friction and coping mechanisms
We also avoid using media as a coping mechanism for life's challenges. By creating friction in our media consumption process, such as the ritual of choosing and playing a DVD, we prevent ourselves from mindlessly turning to media for distraction or comfort.
A beginning and a clearly defined ending
Furthermore, our media consumption habits are designed to respect our time and avoid stealing it away. By choosing media with a clear beginning, middle, and end, we can better manage our time and avoid the trap of binge-watching or endless scrolling.
In conclusion, our family's approach to media consumption is centered around intentionality, effort, and control. By making mindful choices about the platforms, formats, and content we consume, we can enhance the quality of our experiences and maintain a healthy relationship with media. We encourage you to consider your own media consumption habits and explore ways to make them more intentional and meaningful.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
The Challenge of Digital Parenting
In today's world, parenting has become a digital battlefield. We face the dilemma of whether to raise our children as digital minimalists or risk them becoming technologically backward. The truth is, it's not about being afraid of technology; it's about managing its influence on our kids' lives.
We often see parents giving smartphones to their children, not out of necessity, but because it's the default. It's an easy way to keep them occupied while we handle our own tasks. But this unintentional decision can lead to long-term consequences, including technology addiction and social isolation.
A Shift in Norms
Imagine a future where giving a smartphone to a child is as frowned upon as giving them alcohol. As awareness grows about the negative impacts of unrestricted technology access, we believe there will be a significant shift in societal norms. Just as laws regulate alcohol and tobacco for minors, we foresee similar regulations for smartphone usage among children.
Parents will soon realize that the constant flow of notifications and the addictive nature of apps are designed to exploit our attention. This realization will drive a movement towards more mindful and intentional use of technology in parenting.
Intentional Technology Use
Being a digital minimalist doesn't mean rejecting technology altogether. It means using it intentionally, as a tool to enhance learning and creativity, rather than as a default babysitter. For example, showing children how to use a desktop computer for research or creative projects can be beneficial, unlike giving them a smartphone loaded with addictive apps.
We can draw parallels with how technology has evolved in other fields. When Prince recorded his first album, he didn't have the luxury of an iPad with multi-track recording capabilities. He had to navigate through gatekeepers and studios. Today, technology has democratized music production, but it requires intentional use to harness its full potential.
The Dangers of Unrestricted Access
Smartphones, unlike dedicated tools, come with a plethora of distractions. They are designed to keep users engaged, often at the cost of productivity and mental health. This is why it's crucial to set boundaries and teach children the importance of using technology as a tool, not as a crutch.
Gaming, for instance, is often touted as a gateway to tech careers. However, it can also be an entry point to addiction. While it may foster some technical skills, it often limits real-world social interactions and practical knowledge. Encouraging children to balance online activities with offline experiences is key.
Building Real-World Skills
We must emphasize the importance of real-world interactions and skills. Children learn best through hands-on experiences and face-to-face communication. By limiting screen time and encouraging outdoor play, we help them develop essential life skills that technology alone cannot provide.
It's about creating an environment where children can thrive without being tethered to screens. This means providing them with opportunities to explore, create, and interact with the world around them. It also means being role models in our own use of technology.
Setting Boundaries
As parents, it's our responsibility to set rules and boundaries around technology use. This might mean no screens before school or limiting gaming to certain hours. By establishing these guidelines, we help our children develop a healthy relationship with technology.
We also need to be aware of the subtle ways technology can infiltrate our lives. Notifications, for example, are designed to grab our attention and keep us coming back. By turning off unnecessary notifications and being mindful of our own screen time, we can set a positive example for our children.
The Role of Single-Use Devices
One effective strategy is to use single-use devices. For instance, giving a child a dedicated camera instead of a smartphone can foster creativity without the distractions of social media and games. This approach helps children focus on the task at hand and develop specific skills.
Our daughter's experience with a manual camera is a perfect example. Without the option to take selfies, she focuses on capturing meaningful moments and developing her photography skills. This contrasts sharply with peers who use smartphones primarily for social validation.
The Community Factor
The type of community our children are part of also plays a crucial role. By not giving them smartphones, we steer them towards peers who engage in more offline activities. This can lead to richer, more meaningful social interactions and a stronger sense of community.
It's about shaping the environment to support our parenting goals. If we want our children to value real-world experiences, we need to surround them with like-minded individuals and provide opportunities for offline engagement.
The Future of Digital Minimalism
Looking ahead, we believe that digital minimalism will become a mainstream parenting approach. As awareness of the negative impacts of technology grows, more parents will adopt intentional tech use. This shift will not only benefit our children but also society as a whole.
We must remember that technology is a tool, not a master. By using it wisely and teaching our children to do the same, we can harness its benefits without falling prey to its pitfalls. It's about finding a balance that promotes healthy development and real-world skills.
Conclusion
In conclusion, raising children as digital minimalists doesn't mean depriving them of technology. It means using technology intentionally and mindfully, ensuring it serves a purpose rather than becoming a default distraction. By setting boundaries, encouraging real-world interactions, and being role models in our own tech use, we can help our children develop a healthy relationship with technology.
Thank you for joining us on this journey towards more mindful parenting. Let's work together to create a future where technology enhances our lives without controlling them.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
As 40-somethings, we've gained some perspective and have identified six things we wish we'd learned at 20. We believe that these insights can help guide you on your own journey, regardless of your age.
* Try New Things: One of the most important lessons we've learned is the value of trying new things. Whether it's at work or in your personal life, experimenting with different experiences can help you discover your passions and interests. It's essential to step out of your comfort zone and be open to new opportunities, as they can lead to personal growth and self-discovery.
* Don't Be Afraid to Fail: Embracing failure is a vital part of personal and professional growth. We've found that when you're afraid to fail, you limit your chances of success. Instead, view failure as a learning opportunity and use it to improve and grow. Remember that life goes on, and it's essential to keep moving forward.
* Start a Family Early (If That's Your Goal): We've discovered that starting a family early can be a transformative experience. Having children changes your perspective on life, giving you a tangible purpose and helping you prioritize what truly matters. If having a big family is important to you, starting early can help you achieve that goal.
* Follow Your Dreams: While following your passions can be a clichéd piece of advice, we believe that pursuing your dreams is essential. Don't be afraid to go after what you truly want in life, and don't let fear or doubt hold you back. Be willing to take risks and explore different paths to find what truly makes you happy.
* Value Time Over Money: As we've aged, we've come to realize that time is more precious than money. While financial stability is essential, it's crucial to prioritize experiences and relationships over material wealth. Make the most of your time and focus on what truly matters in life.
* Speak Up and Share Your Knowledge: We've learned that sharing our thoughts, ideas, and experiences can make a positive impact on others. Don't be afraid to speak up and share your knowledge, as it can lead to meaningful connections and help create change in your community.
In conclusion, these six lessons have shaped our lives and helped us grow as individuals. We hope that by sharing our insights, we can inspire you to reflect on your own experiences and learn from them. Remember that life is a journey full of ups and downs, and it's essential to keep learning, growing, and evolving.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
I'm reflecting on the increasing use of AI in tools like Google Workspace. It can generate complex language and summarize emails, but this sophistication might actually complicate life more than simplify it.
The world is changing, and so is the way we communicate. The rise of AI in our daily tools, such as Google Workspace, brings a paradox to our doorstep. It offers the ability to create complex, sophisticated language effortlessly, a skill once reserved for the well-trained. But at what cost?
The AI Mirage
In this age of digital transformation, AI presents a mirage of expertise. You can appear to be a scientist, a technician, without actually being one. The allure is undeniable. We're drawn to the idea of simplifying our communication, yet we risk losing authenticity. This is the paradox of AI integration in communication tools. As AI capabilities grow within platforms like Gmail, offering to condense lengthy email threads into concise summaries, we find ourselves at a crossroads. Are we using AI to avoid the complexity of language that we ourselves have created through the same AI?
The Simplicity Dilemma
The dilemma of simplicity versus complexity in communication is more relevant now than ever. We're adding complexity to our lives by using AI, not reducing it. The accessibility of AI, making complex tasks seemingly effortless, is becoming a commodity. Everyone can now pretend to be an expert in any field. But in this world of AI-generated expertise, the true value lies in being able to communicate simply, clearly, and authentically. The irony is stark; as AI becomes more integrated into our daily tools, the unique value it offers diminishes.
The Authenticity Challenge
As AI becomes ubiquitous in tools like Notion, Google Workspace, and note-taking apps, we face the authenticity challenge. Sure, AI can summarize a lengthy contract, but if you're a lawyer, you'll still read it. The real decision-making still requires human touch and understanding. This ubiquity of AI is akin to the proliferation of smartphones. Once a luxury, now a commodity, the uniqueness and value of having a smartphone have plateaued. Similarly, AI is on the same trajectory.
The Focus Factor
In the midst of AI's rise, focus becomes a rare and valuable commodity. The ability to concentrate, to not be a slave to technology and its distractions, is what truly sets one apart. It's not about having access to the latest tech, but about how we use it. The value lies not in the tool itself but in our ability to wield it effectively.
The Innovation Paradox
The paradox of innovation in technology is that as it becomes more accessible, its unique value decreases. This is evident in the evolution of smartphones and now AI. What was once innovative and rare is now common and commoditized. The real differentiation lies not in possessing technology but in how we use it to enhance our lives and work.
The Human Element
In conclusion, the true power of technology, especially AI, lies in its ability to augment human capabilities, not replace them. As AI becomes a standard feature across various applications, the human element in decision-making and communication becomes more crucial. The ability to communicate effectively, with clarity and authenticity, is what will set us apart in an AI-saturated world.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
As a couple and as parents, we have experimented with various note-taking applications and have discovered the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Documenting
One of the most significant benefits of using a note-taking application is the ability to track and remember important events and information. For example, we found it extremely useful to document our health history, especially when visiting different doctors. It also comes in handy for keeping track of our children's health and identifying patterns in their recurring illnesses.
Home maintenance
Another advantage of using a note-taking application is the ability to store information about our home, such as maintenance schedules, preferred products, and appliance model numbers. This information can be easily accessed when needed, making our lives more efficient and less stressful.
Gathering ideas
As content creators, we also find note-taking applications helpful for gathering ideas for articles and noting business ideas. Electronic note-taking allows for better connections between ideas, sparking new concepts that may not have been possible with traditional paper notebooks.
Location of data storage
When choosing a note-taking application, it's essential to consider where the data will be stored, whether it can be exported, and if it will be encrypted. These factors contribute to the security and longevity of our data, ensuring that our private information remains safe and accessible.
We have experimented with various types of note-taking applications, including traditional structured ones like Evernote and OneNote, bi-directional note-takers and outliners like Roam, Obsidian, and Logseq, and project management tools with note-taking components like Asana and ClickUp.
We use Obsidian
After trying several applications, we have settled on Obsidian and Logseq as our preferred note-taking tools. Obsidian works well for those who prefer a more structured approach to note-taking, while Logseq offers more flexibility with its block-level organization.
In addition to these applications, we also use TickTick for simple task management and collaboration between the two of us. This combination of tools allows us to work efficiently together while still maintaining the security and accessibility of our individual notes.
Amplenote is also great
For those who need a single tool for both note-taking and task management, we recommend Amplenote. However, this option comes with a monthly fee, so it's essential to weigh the benefits against the cost.
In conclusion, note-taking applications have significantly improved our lives by helping us stay organized, remember important information, and spark new ideas. By carefully considering the various options available and selecting the right tools for our needs, we have found a system that works well for both of us. We encourage everyone to explore the world of note-taking applications and discover the benefits they can bring to their lives.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
The decision to give our daughter a phone was driven by her increasing independence as she started walking to school by herself. We wanted her to be able to call us in case of an emergency, but we did not want to track her with a GPS device. We opted for a minimalist phone because it is a simple device that allows her to make voice calls and send SMS messages without the distractions that come with smartphones.
Many parents are not aware of the existence of minimalist phones, and they assume that giving their child a phone means giving them a smartphone. We believe that it is important for parents to be informed about the different types of phones available and the benefits of minimalist phones. We shared our experience with other parents in our community and were happy to see that many were interested in learning more about minimalist phones.
Peer pressure
One of the concerns that parents may have when giving their child a minimalist phone is peer pressure. Children may feel left out if all their friends have smartphones, and they may want one too. It is important for parents to talk to their children about the dangers of using smartphones and social media, but it is not enough to simply tell them not to use them. We believe that it is important for children to understand why they should limit their use of smartphones and social media and to make their own decisions based on that knowledge.
We believe that in four years, when our daughter turns 12, more parents will be aware of the dangers of smartphones and social media, but it will still be a problem. Social media and smartphones are addictive, and it is difficult for children (and adults) to resist their pull. However, we remain hopeful that more people will become aware of the negative impact of these devices on mental health and democracy.
Relying too much on technology
In addition to discussing the benefits of minimalist phones, we also talked about the dangers of relying too much on technology. We discussed how chat GPT4, a computer program that can generate text, is replacing jobs that require writing and summarizing. While this technology has its benefits, it can also lead to a loss of skills and a lack of creativity. We believe that it is important to strike a balance between using technology to our advantage and not relying on it too much.
Overall, we believe that giving our daughter a minimalist phone was the right choice for us. It allows her to be independent while also giving us peace of mind knowing that she can call us if she needs to. We hope that more parents will consider giving their children minimalist phones and that the trend towards simpler technology will continue. As always, we welcome your thoughts and comments on our website or YouTube channel.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
In this podcast, we discussed how we use a private family CRM to manage our family life. As busy parents, we found it increasingly challenging to keep track of all the necessary information related to our family, such as important documents, contacts, health information, and education records. To solve this problem, we created a family CRM using Obsidian, a bidirectional note-taking application that allows us to interconnect notes and easily search for specific information.
One of the primary reasons why we chose Obsidian as our family CRM is its plain text note-taking format, which ensures the future accessibility of our notes. We also appreciate its bidirectional linking functionality, which allows us to connect different notes and create a comprehensive database of information that is easy to navigate. Additionally, Obsidian is free to use and can be synced across multiple devices using cloud storage services like Dropbox.
Co-operation and sharing contacts
As we started using our family CRM, we split up some family duties and shared access to the database. This allowed us to transfer projects between each other and work more efficiently as a team. We also created different categories of contacts within the CRM, including companies, people, roles, things, and ideas. By using bidirectional links between these categories, we can quickly find all the contacts related to a specific company or person.
One of the most significant advantages of using a private family CRM is that it helps us save time and money by providing us with access to valuable information and contacts. For example, we have access to the best plumbers in our area and know which ones are most reliable based on our experience. We also maintain important health information about our children in the CRM, such as allergies and medication history.
Learning curve
Although it took some time for Gosia to adjust to using Obsidian as a family CRM, she eventually found it very useful in keeping track of all our family information in one place. Initially, it took her about six months to get accustomed to using the application, but now she finds it much easier to use and recommends it to others.
Overall, using a private family CRM has been a game-changer for us in terms of managing our family life. It has allowed us to keep all our important information in one place and easily share it between family members. We highly recommend using a similar system if you have a partner or a group of people that you work with on various projects. By creating a family CRM, you can save time, stay organized, and ensure that all your important information is easily accessible when you need it.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
As parents, we are worried about the potential consequences of our children growing up in a world where technology addiction and social media dependence are widespread. We fear that they may struggle to communicate openly and genuinely with others, leading to a society where meaningful connections are increasingly rare. This is why we have made the decision not to give our daughters smartphones, comparing this choice to decisions made about alcohol, drugs, or other addictive and highly regulated forms of entertainment.
Recent studies have linked depression and poor mental health among teenagers to smartphone use, particularly iPhones and social media platforms like Instagram. This app, which encourages users to showcase their lives and compare themselves to others, can be especially damaging to girls' self-esteem and body image. By not giving our daughters smartphones, we hope to avoid these issues and direct them towards healthier peer groups and interests.
Peer group?
We recognize that our decision may lead to challenges, such as explaining to our children why they do not have smartphones when many of their peers do. However, we believe that there are multiple peer groups available, and by not providing our children with smartphones, we are guiding them towards a group that shares their values and interests. Just as we had the choice to avoid drugs, alcohol, or certain types of passtimes in our youth, our children can also choose their peer groups based on their preferences and values.
For those who may already be dealing with smartphone addiction in their children, it's essential to remember that it's never too late to address the issue. We suggest talking to your child about how smartphones are designed to grab their attention and asking them how they feel after using social media or other apps. Watch documentaries like "The Social Dilemma" together and discuss the content, helping them understand the potential consequences of their actions.
In cases of severe addiction, seeking professional help may be necessary. However, we believe that by setting a positive example in our own technology use and engaging our children in physical activities and real-world experiences, we can help them develop a healthier relationship with technology.
More offline activities
As our daughters grow older, we plan to involve them in activities such as Scouts and volunteer work to encourage them to spend more time outside of the virtual world. This approach is supported by experts like Cal Newport, who recommend engaging in more physical, real-world activities to help detox from technology and determine which aspects of technology are genuinely beneficial to our lives.
We also believe it's essential to engage with other parents and our local community to discuss these issues and share our experiences. While it may be challenging to convince others to make significant changes in their lives, we can at least try to raise awareness and encourage more face-to-face interaction among families.
It's up to you - consider yourself warned
Ultimately, the decision to give a child a smartphone or not lies with each family. However, we hope that by sharing our thoughts and experiences, we can spark interest and encourage others to consider the potential consequences of smartphone use among teenagers.
In conclusion, we believe that addressing phone addiction among teenagers is a vital issue that requires attention on both individual and collective levels. By making informed decisions as parents and engaging with our communities, we can work together to create a healthier, more connected society for our children and future generations.
Links:
* Stephanie Gruner Buckley, "My daughter was a creative genius, and then we bought her an iPhone" — https://medium.com/modern-parent/my-daughter-was-a-creative-genius-then-we-bought-her-an-iphone-bf617c0b6ca0
* Center for Human Technology, "The Social Dillemma" — https://www.humanetech.com/the-social-dilemma
* Cal Newport "Digital Minimalism" — https://www.calnewport.com/books/digital-minimalism/
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
Technology has undoubtedly made our lives easier and more efficient. From smartphones to laptops, we have access to a vast array of tools and applications that can help us organize our lives, manage our time, and stay on top of our tasks. However, as with any tool, there are potential downsides to technology that we should be aware of.
One argument against technology is presented by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in a tweet:
Anything you do with technology brings progressive and irreversible atrophies to your natural abilities.
While this may seem like an extreme statement, there is some truth to it.
Tech mindfulness
Overreliance on technology can lead to a loss of our natural abilities. For example, we rely on GPS to navigate instead of using our natural sense of direction. We use spell check instead of learning how to spell correctly. We rely on search engines to find information instead of using our own knowledge and intuition. This is not to say that technology is inherently bad, but rather that we need to be mindful of how we use it.
One way to use technology wisely is to be aware of how it is designed. Many technologies are designed to keep our attention, so being mindful of this can help us avoid being exploited by these tools. It also means being selective about the apps and tools we use and choosing those that align with our values and goals.
Boundaries
Another important aspect of using technology wisely is to set boundaries around our use of technology. Being mindful of how much time we spend on our devices can help us avoid addiction and distraction. It also means being intentional about how we use technology and not letting it control us.
Social media is one area where technology has had a significant impact on our lives. While it can be a great way to stay connected with friends and family, it can also be a source of anxiety and stress if we're constantly comparing ourselves to others or seeking validation through likes and comments. By being mindful of how technology affects our relationships, we can use it in a way that enhances our connections with others rather than detracting from them.
Business model
The business model behind technology is also an important consideration. Many social media platforms, for example, are designed to keep us clicking on ads or scrolling endlessly through feeds. By being aware of these business models, we can avoid being exploited by these tools and choose technologies that align with our values and goals.
Productivity applications and project management tools are examples of technology that can be incredibly helpful when used properly. However, they can also be a source of distraction and overwhelm if we're not careful. Being intentional about how we use these tools and choosing those that align with our values can help us avoid these potential downsides.
Regulate?
Ultimately, the key to using technology wisely is to be mindful of how it affects us as individuals and as a society. We need to be aware of its potential pitfalls and work to mitigate them while also taking advantage of its many benefits. By doing so, we can ensure that technology continues to enhance our lives without diminishing our natural abilities or our connections with others.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
We share our journey of rediscovering the simplicity of life through the use of "dumb" phones, as opposed to the highly addictive smartphones that dominate our lives today. Our podcast focuses on making unconventional choices and living an anti-cultural lifestyle, and this experience is no exception.
Like an old Nokia
Our experiment began when we decided to switch from smartphones to dumb phones, inspired by the Punkt MP01 design, reminiscent of the old Nokia phones we used as students. At first, the transition was uncomfortable and painful, as we had grown accustomed to the convenience and features of our smartphones. However, we soon learned that living without a smartphone was, in fact, much easier than we anticipated.
One of us, a busy mother of two, recognized the symptoms of smartphone addiction in her life, such as sleep deprivation and constant distraction from notifications. The switch to a dumb phone forced her out of her comfort zone and made her more aware of her dependence on technology. Despite the initial anger and frustration, she eventually found a middle ground with the Unihertz Titan Pocket, which provided some useful features without the addictive properties of a smartphone.
More talking, less texting
We discovered that using a dumb phone made us appreciate talking to people more, as the phone didn't allow for easy texting. We found that we would hide behind technology if given the chance, and the dumb phone helped us expand our social capabilities.
We both tried going back to smartphones at different points, only to find ourselves slipping back into old habits and addiction patterns. This realization led us to believe that short technological detoxes are not enough to break the cycle of addiction. Instead, using a dumb phone for an extended period can help identify the root causes of our discomfort and dependence on technology.
Balance and privacy
Through this experience, we learned that we could find a balance between the need for certain smartphone features and the desire to live a simpler, less addictive lifestyle. For example, one of us found that a minimalistic Android-based phone, like the Unihertz Titan Pocket, was the perfect middle ground.
While we understand that the privacy concerns regarding data collection by Android and other smartphone operating systems are important, our focus in this experiment was primarily on breaking free from the addictive nature of smartphones.
In conclusion, our journey with dumb phones has been an eye-opening experience that has taught us valuable lessons about our relationship with technology. We've learned that it is possible to find a balance between convenience and simplicity, and that breaking free from smartphone addiction requires more than just a temporary detox. As we continue to explore unconventional choices and anti-cultural lifestyles, we hope to inspire others to question their dependence on technology and seek a more fulfilling way of life.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
I am listening recently to Moriah Woods — highly recommended. It's a singer-songwriter that I didn't know that existed. Recently, with my daughter, we went to an Anneke Van Giersbergen concert and Moriah opened for Anneke. She's very good. She plays moody songs accompanied by acoustic guitar, very good songwriting.
Let's talk about music today.
After trying Tidal, Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Music, I went back recently to purchasing MP3 files from Apple - from iTunes, because I want to own the music I listen to.
It's because I really don't like the concept of streaming. I don't like the fact that you pay a certain amount of money monthly to have access to everything. It's not beneficial for me as a listener because I'm overwhelmed with the number of tracks I have access to. It means also that I don't value those track because this mass of music is so cheap.
I like the fact of possessing the music, of having it on my hard drive, inside my computer, on my storage. Ideally I prefer owning the music on vinyl, but vinyl is not portable at all. So the albums I buy on vinyl, I buy them twice: once on vinyl and the second time as MP3s from iTunes.
You have the money
I think it's okay because first of all, it's not a cost that is prohibitive in 2022. I don't have to buy lots of albums a month, so my home budget is not suffering. It gives me the opportunity to listening mobile of course, but it's all also giving me the opportunity to listening in a better sound quality than I would normally do on Spotify, because I can choose from which player I will play the songs. I don't have to have it on Android on iOS, I can have it on an obscure audiophile MP3 player. I can just copy the files from my hard drive and it's done. It works offline. And I also know that by buying the album twice, I'm actually helping the musician because musicians are really screwed by streaming platforms like Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, etc. You have to generate 3 million streams per month to have a few hundreds of dollars of revenue. It's crazy.
Business model
I've been a musician, so I know how it works. It basically costs you nothing to put an album on Spotify. And then because everybody's paying for the whole catalog, you basically get nothing in return, since the discoverability becomes a huge problem, not the barriers in putting the music on the platform. So you work two years to compose and record the music and then you get a few streams and everybody says: "Yeah, don't expect money for releasing music, play live and sell some merchandise." But I think that musicians should be paid for the music and not for selling merch. They are musicians, not apparel companies, after all.
I think Pink Floyd would not record "The Wall" if they were forced to tour 200 days per year and sell t-shirts in order to sustain themselves financially. They would not have the time nor the mental bandwidth to compose the masterpiece. This is what's happening today in music. Basically, the music that is available online it's usually not arranged in albums, but it's single tracks and it's released every two to three months because if not, people lose interest and forget about the artist.
Making music today is like making videos on Tiktok or YouTube - you have to keep publishing. If not, the channel won't grow.
So I'm very proud of myself that I am buying each album twice: once on vinyl and a second time as MP3 files from iTunes, because I know that at least the musicians that have worked very hard to create the music I enjoy are given a much larger "cut" from those transactions.
Discoverability
And one last word about discoverability: people often get trapped into thinking that Spotify gets them new listeners.
No, it does not.
The sheer amount of new music added every minute to Spotify makes it actually VERY HARD to get organically discovered on Spotify. YouTube is very good at that. Use YouTube for discoverability, and then put your MP3s on Bandcamp, maybe on iTunes - but specifically on a platform that allows the music to be bought by your fans directly and own the files. Not to be streamed. It will give you much more opportunities to gain new listeners than Spotify by word of mouth and by people supporting people, looking for what other listeners listen to and checking the bands other people support.
Like in the old, cassette days.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
There are two components to waking up effortlessly in the morning:
* the time at which you will go to sleep (and this is the most difficult for people who are willing to wake up early),
* patience and practice.
No alarm clock
For a very long time I thought that I had to have a fancy alarm clock or something like that in order to wake up early. Actually what makes effortless waking up early is not a fancy alarm clock, it's just a practice. If you practice long enough, you will wake up without an alarm clock. That's it.
How long you have to practice to not need an alarm clock anymore? I have used an alarm clock to wake up at before 4:00 AM (yes, because my goal is to wake up before 4:00 AM, so bear in mind that I am very, very ambitious on that front) for at least six months before my my body actually adapted to this rhythm and stopped forcing me to sleep when the alarm clock rang.
Right now I'm still having an alarm clock on my bedside table, but I'm actually waking up before this alarm clock - I'm just turning it off after I woke up naturally.
So, I needed to practice waking up early for far longer than the 30 days or 21 days some habit gurus are mentioning as the stretches of time needed to build habits.
Going to sleep
At which hour should you go to sleep? I don't want to give you advice like that. For me, I am aiming at between seven and eight hours of sleep per day, per 24 hours. In order to achieve that, I have to go to sleep (or at least try to go to sleep) at 8:30 PM. Usually it's not so simple and I'm actually asleep closer to 9:00 PM, because my kids want to spend more time with me. They just don't want to stop playing. They want to read a book with me, etc. Because those activities are important for me, I am often pushing back the time when we go to sleep.
It makes seven hours per night. If I am able to be home from work at a normal hour (which is rare, unfortunately), we are able to go to sleep earlier, closer to 8:00 PM and that makes eight hours of sleep per night.
Why so early?
Why am I aiming at waking up before 4:00 AM? It's because I want to be creative in the mornings. I want to read some paper books and I like to do it in the morning because it calms me before my day. I want also to have at least one hour of time before my kids awake to go running. So, all of this added together makes that I need to wake up rather at 4:00 AM. But I suppose that if you are waking up today at seven, a goal of waking up at five would be pretty amazing! So, you know - set your own goals, don't look at me.
Another thing that that helps with going to sleep earlier and and having this kind of schedule is that we have made a choice in our family to go to sleep together. Everybody.
I know that oftentimes parents stay longer when kids are asleep. This is something we did not want to do. Instead we wanted to make a ritual of going to sleep together and having our house "shut down" at night closer to 9:00 PM.
A family rhythm
From our experience, it is easier for everybody if the kids know that you don't go to play and work while they are asleep, but actually everybody goes to sleep together at the same time. It induces a rhythm into the family. The big value is that it's one rhythm for everybody, a shared rhythm - not different rhythms for kids and for parents.
Besides that, even if you don't have kids, I think that it helps to our body to be more in tune with the natural rhythms of the sun setting down and the world waking up with the sun the next morning. A lot of our hormones are linked also to natural light exposure.
So that's it.
Just two components.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
People ghost each other while dating - this is how it all began - but then, it has spread all over the society, because it's comfortable not to end a relationship using a conversation. It's comfortable not to tell someone in their face:
Hey, I don't want to see you anymore.
Everybody ghosts
And so:
* candidates ghost employers,
* employers ghost candidates,
* employers ghost their employees internally (!),
* friends ghost each other,
* companies ghost clients.
I don't know how it is working in your country, but in mine - in Poland - people sometimes send 600 resumes and get zero replies.
Not even a “thank you for applying”.
Because it's so difficult to reply to an email, don't you think?
But it goes way, way beyond that. For example, companies, ghost clients also: I am a client of a law firm and the lawyer with whom I have an eight years relationship takes a month to reply to my emails. I usually get a reply after six or seven attempts at contacting him.
Ghosting destroys people's self-worth
I think it's a societal problem and it should be resolved. You can of course try to resolve it at a personal level by means of retribution: you can make a list of people who ghosted you (that’s what I do!), because one day you will use it against them (I will!) - they will want something from you and it'll be a chance for you to ghost them in return (I will do it!).
You might say:
Oh, there is nothing wrong with ghosting, since everybody does it.
Really? Think about it.
First of all, ghosting in dating, in the job market or between friends - is a sign of disrespect. If you couple disrespect with atomization of society caused by social media and electronic communication services (marketed as better means to connect people, but in reality putting us apart farther away) - it's a very, very bad combination. Moreover, before texting, before Facebook, before the various text chats - you could at least rely on your friends to console you when someone ghosted you. You could rely on some kind of a sense of living in the same world, with other people, with your friends and neighbors.
The game for today is very different: if you send 400 CVS for 400 different job offers, each of the hiring managers that chooses not to reply to you is actually making a very, very small decision based on her or his comfort. But this decision gets added up on your side. One small decision on the side of the hiring manager can appear to be insignificant, but for you 400 not replied job applications can have a consequence on how you see yourself, on your self-worth. It can make you tip over from a state of depression to considering suicide, for example. None of those hiring managers, of course, thinks about that when choosing not to reply to your email.
A part of the process?
They think that it's part of the process. But if you add this process to what happens in dating (dating apps that objectify people, disrespectful decisions based only on looks, disrespectful loss of contact after one meeting), between friends (no reply for no reason, you ask yourself whether you did something wrong) and very often also in the family - you get the idea.
You might think now that it's because I'm not modern enough, I don't understand how modern communication works. If you think that - please, start blogging or maybe even start making TikToks. You probably heard that people are making millions of dollars blogging. Do it. People on TikTok have massive audiences. Try that.
A decent human being
Guess what? Time passes and you don't have millions of followers on TikTok. Nobody looks at your TikToks, you get 45 views at best. And of course, you don't make millions on your blog. Actually, nobody opens your blog.
So you buy Facebook ads, maybe Instagram ads - and still nothing. Just wasted money.
Add this kind of systemic ghosting facilitated by technology to the ghosting performed by other human beings in dating, between friends, in the family, on the job market - also via a technology that facilitates it. Do you see it? It's not a really cool image of the society.
That is precisely why I think ghosting is a very serious problem. That is why I also think that digital minimalism is one of the best solutions to it, since it promotes respect and using technology as a tool and not as a comfortable escape from normal human behaviours.
Please be aware of the fact that your small decision of ghosting someone will add to a series of ghosting that this person is experiencing and it can profoundly affect this person's life.
You can always choose to be a decent human being.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe -
I have changed a lot in my life and in the life of my family using environment shaping. As far as I know, it's the only way to achieve long term results. I learned how to eat clean by shaping my environment, for example. But what does it mean — by "shaping your environment"? It means, for example, that
if you want to stop eating potato chips, you should not have potato chips in your house.
The same goes for bread. We have stopped eating bread and pasta. In order not to be tempted, we have actually thrown away every piece of bread and every packet of pasta we had in our house. And we have never bought them again.
And — yes! — the same goes for running, the same goes for digital pragmatism also!
I shape my environment by having my camera in the main pocket, the left pocket in of my trousers, instead of my smartphone.
Environment shaping appears in a lot of books about habits, productivity and changing your life. It's in the James Clear's “Atomic Habits”, it's in the Kathy Milkman's "How to change?" book. There's a lot of talk about environment shaping in the “Make time" book by the two guys from Google.
I think it's the best way to achieve long term change. Environment shaping is not a strategy based on your strength of a character — which is good since your character can sometimes be weak. It's not based on a force of you not-doing-things-that-you-would-like-to-do. We have finite amounts of will. We have finite amounts of decision power throughout our days. Moreover, lots of today's media and professional environment actually makes it very difficult to make choices and decide. You have to choose which lunch to eat. You have to choose which tshirt to, to buy. You have to choose...
This is precisely why environment shaping works — because once you set up your environment so it helps you make those changes or maintain something in your life, you have much less of a hard time sticking to it.
You don't train for a marathon by making one big training.
You train for a marathon by going for a run every day for three months.
This is how it happens.
Get full access to Digital Pragmatism at www.digitalpragmatism.com/subscribe - Visa fler
