Avsnitt
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
On Truth Social, Trump criticized Russia’s recent missile strikes on Kyiv, calling them “not necessary” and “bad timing.”
He urged Putin to stop and claimed that 5,000 soldiers are dying weekly.
Trump emphasized his desire to finalize a peace deal.
Russian Strike on Kyiv:
A significant attack on Kyiv occurred, including what appeared to be hypersonic missiles and drones.
At least one direct hit was confirmed; there are questions about whether some explosions were due to Ukrainian air defenses malfunctioning.
This type of strike on the capital is rare and seen as a strong signal.
Negotiation Dynamics:
Trump claims Russia is ready to negotiate peace, but Ukrainian President Zelensky is rejecting terms proposed by the Trump team.
Zelensky continues to insist on full Ukrainian territorial integrity, including Crimea.
Trump sees Zelensky as stubborn and unrealistic, contrasting him with Putin, who Trump says is at least willing to negotiate under defined conditions.
Longstanding Tensions:
The video suggests the war could’ve been avoided had Ukraine honored the Minsk agreements, which would’ve given limited autonomy to regions like Donetsk and Luhansk.
It argues that Russia has consistently been open to negotiated settlements, but the West and Ukraine have resisted.
Trump’s Frustration:
Trump feels disrespected by Zelensky, who has publicly dismissed Trump’s peace proposals and called out U.S. leaders for being “duped by Russian propaganda.”
Trump believes his approach is the only realistic path to peace but feels blocked by Zelensky’s unwillingness to compromise.
Crimea’s Status:
A major sticking point: Russia considers Crimea legally theirs, embedded in their constitution.
Trump’s team believes recognizing Russian control of Crimea is essential for peace.
Zelensky refuses, holding to Ukraine’s claim and sovereignty over all territory.
Bottom Line:
Trump sees Putin as serious and rational, while Zelensky is viewed as confrontational and unrealistic.
The Russian strike on Kyiv is interpreted as a warning: if Ukraine doesn’t engage in negotiations, the conflict will escalate.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The discussion heavily criticizes Ukrainian President Zelensky, calling his recent public statements delusional and inflammatory, particularly about Crimea and the broader war with Russia. It suggests Zelensky is disconnected from the dire military situation on the ground and has no real leverage, implying his comments only prolong the conflict.
There’s speculation that Trump might have intentionally sabotaged a Ukraine deal by pushing unrealistic demands. U.S. officials, including the Vice President, are reportedly signaling readiness to walk away from diplomacy if an agreement isn’t reached soon. They propose freezing territorial lines to stop the killing, but stress time is running out.
Meanwhile, Russia—through Kremlin spokesman Peskov—has made it clear it will not give up any of the territories it has annexed, calling the matter non-negotiable. Putin is said to be preparing for a prolonged military push, expanding Russia's military capabilities and strategy.
Several commentators argue that the U.S. public doesn’t grasp the real cost of war the way Russians do, due to vastly different historical experiences. The talk ends with predictions that Zelensky’s time in power is limited—suggesting he may soon be ousted, disappear, or flee as Russia increases pressure and the U.S. potentially withdraws support.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
The discussion centers on the stalled diplomatic efforts to negotiate a resolution to the Ukraine-Russia conflict, particularly over Crimea and Russian-occupied territories. The U.S. proposed a deal that would involve recognizing Crimea as Russian, which President Zelensky firmly rejected. The guest, international relations expert John Mearsheimer, says it's unsurprising because neither Zelensky nor influential Ukrainian political forces would accept such terms. He also notes the Russians are unlikely to accept the current U.S. proposal either.
Mearsheimer argues the U.S. administration is internally divided—some are willing to concede to Russia's key demands, while others strongly oppose it—making it nearly impossible to craft a unified, coherent position. The failed meeting in London, which saw top officials like Secretary of State Rubio pull out, likely signals that the proposal was dead on arrival, and perhaps intentionally so, giving the U.S. a pretext to withdraw from the process.
He also critiques the rampant deception in international diplomacy, noting that excessive lying erodes credibility, making genuine negotiations harder. Mearsheimer concludes that a diplomatic resolution is unlikely and predicts the war will ultimately be settled on the battlefield.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker criticizes how the Ukraine war is being handled and portrayed, arguing there’s a major disparity in how events are viewed by the West versus other perspectives. Key points include:
Use of Civilians as Shields: The Ukrainian military allegedly used civilian areas and people as shields in cities like Mariupol, leading to massive destruction. Ukrainian snipers were reportedly positioned in civilian zones, preventing people from fleeing to maintain strategic advantages.Western Narrative and Prolonging the War: The speaker argues that Western support for Ukraine is less about helping the country and more about continuing the conflict to oppose Russia. They suggest the West, particularly Europe, is unwilling to pursue peace, instead waiting for a future U.S. Democratic administration to continue backing the war.Critique of European Leadership: European politicians are labeled as unrealistic and heavily influenced by pro-U.S. organizations. The speaker claims they are sacrificing their citizens’ welfare for a war they cannot sustain, financially or militarily.Inevitability of Peace on Russian Terms: The speaker believes Russia has already won the war, and a peace agreement must accept Putin’s demands—meaning Ukraine cedes some territory. They endorse Donald Trump’s plan for ending the conflict, viewing it as the only viable path forward.Collapse of the EU Predicted: There's a prediction that the EU will fragment within a decade due to economic strain from the war. Countries like Hungary may leave the union, and the cost of rebuilding Ukraine would be unbearable for major European economies.Trump’s Role: The speaker supports Trump’s stance, suggesting only the U.S. under Trump can pressure Ukraine and Europe into ending the war. They even recommend U.S. control over Ukraine’s nuclear facilities to prevent potential sabotage.Historical Parallel to WWII: A comparison is drawn between Ukraine’s current situation and Germany in 1945—suggesting that the war is unwinnable for Ukraine and prolonging it only leads to more destruction.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
U.S. and NATO policy toward Russia and Ukraine has been misguided and aggressive, particularly since 2014, when figures like Victoria Nuland helped cultivate a regime in Ukraine hostile to Russia.
The U.S. should have withdrawn from Ukraine early during Trump's presidency, cutting aid and normalizing relations with Russia, which is described as strategically essential.
Putin’s intentions are portrayed as consistent and focused on removing the root causes of the conflict, not just stopping attacks. The speaker sees him as sincere.
Zelensky is depicted as a major obstacle to peace, unwilling to make concessions because any peace deal would lead to his political downfall.
The Biden administration and Western elites are criticized for pushing a narrative of permanent hostility with Russia and for allegedly prioritizing globalist goals over peace.
Trump is criticized for thinking he could broker a deal, rather than just pulling out decisively.
NATO leadership, particularly Jens Stoltenberg, is portrayed as delusional for thinking Europe can prepare for a permanent standoff with Russia, especially given economic issues like German deindustrialization.
The speaker predicts a collapse of the current globalist political order, including leaders like Stoltenberg and von der Leyen, and calls for a more realistic, stability-focused foreign policy.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Trump was weighing military action against Iran versus a diplomatic resolution.
While he often used strong rhetoric, he typically avoided actual military escalation.
Trump’s Approach:
He withdrew from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) in 2018, criticizing it for not covering missile programs.
Despite talk of a "better deal," no new agreement was reached during his term due to maximalist demands and internal administration resistance.
Iran’s Response:
Iran initially remained within JCPOA limits after U.S. withdrawal, but eventually resumed enrichment as sanctions were reimposed.
It now holds over 8,200 kg of enriched uranium, compared to the 300 kg cap under the JCPOA, and enriches up to 60%, just short of weapons-grade (90%).
Motivations Behind Iran's Enrichment:
Experts suggest Iran’s enrichment is likely a negotiation tactic rather than a clear step toward building a bomb.
U.S. intelligence has confirmed that Iran has not decided to weaponize its nuclear program.
Internal Debate in Iran:
Some Iranian hardliners advocate for weaponization, citing distrust of U.S. intentions.
However, the Supreme Leader has not made a final decision.
Impact of U.S. Policy:
The abandonment of the deal and pressure tactics may have inadvertently pushed Iran closer to nuclear capabilities, the opposite of the intended outcome.
A military strike could accelerate Iran's move toward weaponization, making diplomacy more critical than ever.
Recent Remarks by Trump (March 7):
Trump hinted that a decision was imminent regarding Iran, suggesting either a peace deal or decisive action was coming soon.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Breaking News Summary – Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth
NPR reported that the White House is considering replacing Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, although the White House press secretary has denied this, calling it "fake news" and asserting that the president still fully supports Hegseth.
Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by controversy and chaos, including:
“SignalGate”: A major breach where Hegseth allegedly discussed military operations over Signal, a civilian encrypted messaging app. This is considered a serious security violation in the defense community.
Internal Turmoil: Three Pentagon officials were fired and one resigned recently, including Dan Caldwell, a known ally of Hegseth. No clear explanation has been given, and accusations of leaks have circulated without formal charges or evidence presented.
Pentagon Resistance: There's significant institutional resistance to Hegseth’s leadership and proposed reforms. Critics say he lacks the traditional qualifications for the role (e.g., high military rank, executive leadership experience).
Support & Criticism: Supporters say Hegseth was brought in to bring change and a “warrior ethos,” and argue he’s facing sabotage from entrenched Pentagon elements. Critics counter that his mistakes—especially the SignalGate incident—undermine his credibility and leadership.
In short, the Pentagon is in a state of dysfunction, with serious questions surrounding Hegseth’s leadership, internal loyalty, and national security judgment. While the White House publicly backs him, the situation remains volatile.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Europe’s military capacity is limited: European countries cannot match Russia’s military production or sustain operations without U.S. support.
Trump could justify withdrawal based on the futility of ongoing efforts and shifting political logic.
Europe would panic and struggle to fill the gap left by the U.S. due to budgetary and industrial constraints.
NATO is essentially synonymous with the U.S., and without it, European defense is largely ineffective.
Russia would maintain its current military strategy, as it is already operating with efficiency and high kill ratios.
If Ukraine loses Western support, Russia could install a neutral, pro-Russian regime and potentially let parts of western Ukraine be absorbed by neighboring countries.
The situation is seen as a consequence of the West’s 2014 involvement in Ukraine, implying that avoiding interference back then might have prevented the war.
The discussion ends with a critical reflection on missed diplomatic opportunities and the tragic human cost of the conflict.Transcr
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavis...
Russian Military Dominance: The speaker argues that Russia is clearly dominating the battlefield and that the West lacks the military and industrial capacity to effectively counter it in the short to medium term.
European Military Limitations: European forces are underprepared and underfunded. Even if political consensus existed, Europe would need 5–10 years of significant military buildup—doubling spending and expanding industrial production—to match Russia’s capabilities.
Russian Mobilization Capacity: Russia may be preparing for a summer offensive or simply planning strategically. They reportedly have a reserve force of up to 5 million and the infrastructure to scale up mobilization within six months.
Strategic Intentions: There's debate over whether Russia wants to expand further into Europe. Some believe Putin desires buffer states rather than outright territorial expansion, mostly to prevent NATO encroachment—a long-standing concern voiced since the 1990s.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
Urgency for Decision: The U.S. government, particularly under Trump’s administration, is signaling that it will decide within days whether it's feasible to negotiate a short-term peace deal in the Russia-Ukraine war. If not, the U.S. is prepared to walk away and stop further engagement.
Shift in U.S. Strategy: Secretary of State (possibly misidentified as Marco Rubio in the text) made strong statements during a stop in Paris, indicating the U.S. is aligning more closely with Russia’s view of the conflict and acknowledging the imbalance of power between Ukraine and Russia.
Stalled Negotiations: While talks between the U.S. and Russia appear to be narrowing in on key issues (like NATO guarantees and territorial control), the gap between the U.S. and Ukraine is widening. Ukraine is seen as resisting the current diplomatic terms.
Past Opportunities Missed: The speaker criticizes previous administrations for failing to act when better deals were possible (e.g., Istanbul early in the war, post-battlefield victories in 2022). Now, the remaining deal options are worse.
Last Chance for Peace: The current negotiations are seen as the last window for a diplomatic resolution. If not accepted, Russia is likely to escalate the war militarily with its growing stockpiles and force readiness.
No Military Solution from the U.S.: The Trump administration has ruled out additional military aid to Ukraine, believing it won't change the war’s outcome and would be a waste of resources.
Concern for Human Cost: Beyond money and equipment, the U.S. emphasizes the high human toll, citing disproportionate Ukrainian casualties. There’s a sense of urgency to stop the war to prevent further loss of life.
Call to Accept Reality: Trump’s team is urging Europe and Ukraine to face the reality of the situation. Continuing to resist negotiations may lead to greater losses and no future peace opportunities.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker criticizes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, accusing him of prolonging the war with Russia despite clear signs of Ukrainian losses and missed opportunities for peace since 2022. He questions why Ukrainian families haven’t more strongly opposed the continuation of the war, suggesting fear of repression may be the reason. The speaker also highlights Zelensky’s stated hatred toward Russians and argues that this emotional stance hinders peace efforts.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is referenced as claiming Zelensky’s hatred and unwillingness to negotiate are major obstacles to ending the war. The speaker supports this, asserting that Ukraine’s military is shrinking and unsustainable, while Russia’s is growing.
Former President Trump is mentioned as viewing the conflict as President Biden’s responsibility and expressing a desire to end it. Trump is portrayed as aiming to improve relations with Russia and focus on long-term strategic concerns like nuclear nonproliferation and global stability, emphasizing the war must eventually end through diplomacy.
War Rages On while Europe & Zelensky Dither / Lt Col Daniel Davis
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The Business of Nato: Selling FEAR
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The discussion centers around the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, Donald Trump's stance on ending it, and broader geopolitical factors. The conversation explores whether peace is attainable or if further escalation is inevitable.
Key Points:
Trump's Position:
Trump wants to end the Russia-Ukraine war and is showing frustration over the ongoing conflict.
He relies heavily on his "Art of the Deal" approach but may be underestimating Russia's firm stance.
Lawyer Steve Witkoff, acting as a kind of unofficial envoy, had a long, serious discussion with Putin, potentially signaling a shift in understanding.
Challenges for Trump:
He faces internal political pressures from pro-war figures like Marco Rubio and Michael Waltz but is also supported by anti-war voices like JD Vance.
Trump must ultimately take decisive action rather than remaining passive.
Ukraine's Role:
Trump recently suggested that while Russia started the war, Zelensky also bears some blame for provoking it and fighting a war he can't win.
Critics argue that the U.S. bears significant responsibility by encouraging confrontation with Russia via Ukraine to divide it from China—based on a 2021 article outlining such a strategy.
Criticism of U.S. Foreign Policy:
The U.S. is accused of intentionally provoking Russia to weaken it and prevent a Russia-China alliance.
The speaker claims that U.S. assumptions about Russian weakness were false and led to a miscalculated war.
Reaction from Ukraine:
Ukrainian analyst Hanna Shelest argues Trump’s approach is like "cutting off a hand instead of healing it" and accuses Russia of ethnic cleansing in occupied territories.
The speaker counters that claim, saying many in those areas willingly voted to join Russia and that actual persecution happened in Ukraine, not in the Russian-controlled regions.
Conclusion:
The war is unlikely to end through negotiations—it will be decided on the battlefield.
The U.S. and Trump still have influence to stop it but need to take real action, not just talk.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Trump's Developing Deal w/Iran
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
Trump envoy Steve Witco indicated on Fox News that a negotiated settlement to end the war in Ukraine between the U.S. and Russia might be near. While that could be good news for those wanting the war to end, it raised tensions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who appears resistant to such negotiations.
Key Points:
Trump vs. Zelensky:
Zelensky criticized Trump and Vice President Harris on 60 Minutes.
Analysts argue Trump may now have more tension with Zelensky than with Putin.
Trump recently said the war "wasn't his" but now it's his responsibility as president.
Trump's Stance on Ending the War:
Trump has talked about ending the war quickly but hasn't yet taken concrete action.
Critics say his administration has largely continued Biden’s Ukraine policy, including ongoing military aid.
Colonel Doug Macgregor’s View:
Says Trump hasn't fully taken control of U.S. foreign policy.
Believes Zelensky should’ve been cut off from U.S. support early.
Claims Trump needs to stop vacillating and take decisive leadership.
Responsibility for the War:
Trump said Putin shouldn’t have started it, but also that Zelensky and Biden could have prevented it.
Macgregor agrees Biden could have stopped the war by halting NATO expansion and negotiating with Russia.
Criticism of NATO and Western Strategy:
The war stems from NATO’s eastward expansion and ignoring Russian warnings.
NATO military support for Ukraine has failed strategically and tactically, with Ukrainian forces bearing the cost.
European & British Reaction:
Some in the UK accuse Trump of repeating Kremlin propaganda.
Macgregor dismisses these critics as part of a declining British elite clinging to outdated power structures.
Zelensky's Role in Prolonging War:
He’s accused of ignoring peace opportunities (e.g. Minsk agreements, Istanbul talks).
Critics say Zelensky’s policies provoked conflict by pushing to retake Crimea and other disputed regions.
Geopolitical Shifts:
The conversation criticizes America’s failed economic war on China and its diminishing global power.
Macgregor argues the “natural world order” (U.S.-led post-WWII dominance) is fading, and new powers (e.g., BRICS nations) are rising.
Conclusion: The discussion is highly critical of U.S. and NATO policies, portrays Zelensky as a puppet propped up by Western elites, and urges Trump to stop wavering and act decisively to end the war. It reflects a broader skepticism of current Western foreign policy and highlights shifting global power dynamics.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky insists that a “just peace” means reclaiming all Ukrainian territory occupied by Russia, stating that Ukraine will never accept Russian control of those areas. He emphasizes Ukraine’s sovereignty and determination, though he doesn’t offer a clear strategy for how to achieve this.
The discussion then shifts to the geopolitical tension between Zelensky, Putin, and Trump, suggesting that Zelensky and parts of Europe may be trying to drive a wedge between Trump and Putin, potentially complicating peace negotiations. There's concern that some European leaders, such as Macron and Scholz, are more focused on political posturing than on military or diplomatic effectiveness.
Colonel Jacques Baud, a former NATO officer, critiques the lack of clear Western strategy—both from Zelensky and European leaders. He argues that:
Zelensky continues military operations that have failed and lacked strategic value.
Ukraine missed an opportunity for peace in April 2022.
Western nations, including the EU, show no real plan for resolution—relying instead on anti-Russia rhetoric and symbolic gestures.
Trump, despite criticisms, at least shows a willingness to engage diplomatically with Russia.
A missile strike on the Ukrainian city of Sumy is discussed as a case study in propaganda and blame. Zelensky used the attack to condemn Russia, but a Ukrainian politician revealed that a military ceremony in a civilian area may have provoked the strike. Baud suggests these narratives may be manipulated to maintain Western support, and stresses the need for neutral international investigations into such incidents.
The segment ends with a broader critique of European diplomacy, particularly figures like Kaja Kallas, who focus heavily on anti-Russia sentiment without offering coherent strategies or engaging in other global crises.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Trump's Peace Initiative: Donald Trump has prioritized ending the Russia-Ukraine war in his 2024 presidential campaign. Since returning to office, he has initiated diplomacy previously absent, including sending delegations and engaging directly with Vladimir Putin.
Recent Diplomacy: Steve Witkoff, one of Trump’s envoys, met with Putin in St. Petersburg in a 5-hour meeting. This is part of ongoing negotiations aimed at brokering peace. Meanwhile, Trump has had direct communication with Putin and sent multiple delegations abroad.
Conflicting US Strategies: There is internal conflict within Trump’s team:
Steve Witkoff has proposed a controversial plan that reportedly accepts Russia's control over four eastern Ukrainian regions, drawing backlash from humanitarian groups and political figures.
Keith Kellogg, another Trump envoy, opposes Witkoff’s plan, arguing it would require Ukraine to cede too much and abandon civilians in contested areas.
Russian Demands: Russia, through figures like Sergey Lavrov, insists on:
Recognition of territorial claims (June 14 lines).
Ukrainian neutrality (no NATO membership).
Demilitarization and “denazification” of Ukraine.
Kellogg's Alternative Plan: Kellogg proposed a post-war partition of Ukraine similar to post-WWII Berlin, with Western forces (British and French) stationed in western Ukraine. This is seen as provocative by Russia, contradicting their demand for no NATO presence.
Ukrainian Dilemma: Ukraine faces a difficult choice—either accept Trump-Putin terms and potentially lose territory and displace civilians, or continue fighting with uncertain Western support. The conflict is reaching a decision point.
Conclusion: The path to peace is complicated by internal U.S. disagreements, firm Russian demands, and the harsh reality for Ukrainian leadership. Any progress will likely hinge on whether a direct Trump-Putin meeting occurs and what terms can realistically be accepted by all sides.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
China Strikes Back against U.S. / Lt Col Daniel Davis
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Western Ammunition Depletion:
The UK and EU have depleted their munitions stockpiles by sending old or excess supplies to Ukraine.
These supplies were often destroyed after arrival, particularly in Poland.
Europe now has little left and is borrowing money to fund further aid, with no clear return on investment.
Western Narratives vs. Reality:
Western leaders and media have repeatedly claimed Russia was on the verge of collapse—running out of ammunition, tanks, and troops—which has proven false.
In contrast, Russia has increased military production and reportedly has far superior industrial and manpower reserves compared to Ukraine and the West.
Russian Military Strength:
Russia is producing more equipment and munitions than the combined West, bolstered by support from countries like North Korea.
Russia also has a large reserve of trained military personnel they can still mobilize, unlike Ukraine.
Inevitability of Russian Advances:
If diplomatic solutions fail, Russia is likely to continue expanding on the battlefield.
Ukrainian manpower and resources are insufficient to resist a sustained Russian offensive.
Diplomacy & U.S. Role:
Unlike Western Europe, which is accused of ignoring root causes, the U.S. is engaging in deeper discussions with Russia, including post-war relations, disarmament, and economic issues.
Russian officials, particularly Lavrov, emphasize that NATO expansion into Ukraine was a red line and must be reversed permanently for peace.
Territorial Demands:
Russia dismisses the idea of returning to Ukraine’s 1991 borders.
The "minimum" Russian demands now appear to include full control over the four annexed regions and possibly more territory, especially areas with significant ethnic Russian populations.
Russian Offensive Movements:
Video and intelligence suggest Russia is mobilizing for a new offensive, especially in the Zaporizhzhia region.
These movements signal strategic intent, not just bargaining, as Russia appears ready and willing to continue advancing militarily.
Zelensky’s Position:
Ukraine continues to request more Western support, particularly Patriot missile systems, but has received little.
Ukraine’s stance remains firm on not ceding territory, though this position appears increasingly untenable given the military imbalance.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Please visit Alexander at: https://www.youtube.com/@AlexMercouris/videos
https://www.youtube.com/@TheDuran/videos
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
- Visa fler
