Avsnitt
-
The speaker harshly criticizes a U.S. general for what they see as delusional takes on American military success, citing failures in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. They argue that the Soviet Union (not the U.S.) was primarily responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, inflicting 80% of German military casualties. The speaker accuses the general—and others like Lindsey Graham and Ben Hodges—of living in a dangerous fantasy that costs lives.
The discussion shifts to Donald Trump’s recent Truth Social post claiming he had a long call with Vladimir Putin. Trump emphasized Putin’s plan to respond to recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian airbases. The speaker suggests that Trump’s silence prior to the post was due to a stern message relayed by Russian officials—likely via Marco Rubio—warning that the U.S. might be blamed for the attacks. The Russians reportedly saw these strikes, particularly on strategic nuclear assets, as provocations possibly backed by the U.S.
Putin’s televised remarks labeled Ukraine a terrorist state and rejected the idea of negotiating with its leadership, citing recent attacks on high-value military targets. The speaker interprets Putin’s tone and body language as intensely angry, signaling a major escalation risk. They describe the situation as deeply personal for Putin—likened to an attack on “his family”—and predict a harsh Russian response, emphasizing that the call with Trump was likely confrontational and serious.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
'How can we negotiate with those resorting to terrorism?'
Russian president Vladimir Putin asks how any deal can be done with those funding and essentially directing terrorism.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he had a 90-minute phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, during which they discussed the Ukraine war. Putin reportedly warned Trump of a coming response to a recent Ukrainian attack on Russia’s strategic bomber force. International relations scholar John Mearsheimer reacted strongly, saying the situation is worsening on multiple fronts: Gaza, Iran, Ukraine, and East Asia. He argues the U.S. has lost control over allies and adversaries alike, and criticizes Trump for failing to resolve major global issues he once promised to fix.
Mearsheimer warns that the Ukraine conflict, especially recent Ukrainian (and potentially U.S.-supported) strikes on Russia’s nuclear infrastructure, risks dangerous escalation. He condemns the use of the term "terrorism" to describe Ukraine’s military actions, but stresses that Russia may see these as justification for serious retaliation. Given the rising desperation and anger in Moscow, he expresses growing concern that the war could eventually trigger Russian use of nuclear weapons, particularly if they feel cornered or unable to win conventionally. The overall tone is one of alarm about America's strategic direction and growing global instability.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Strategic Silence: Trump’s lack of public response is seen as a way to protect a joint operation or maintain diplomatic positioning.
Mixed Messaging: While Trump criticizes Russia for attacks, he has been silent on Ukrainian counterstrikes. His strategy seems inconsistent or unclear, possibly attempting to pressure both sides.
Desire for Peace Talks: Trump is serious about facilitating negotiations in Istanbul and is willing to be personally involved if it could help.
On Ukraine’s Position
Posturing at Talks: Ukraine's delegate Umarov made strong demands for a ceasefire and humanitarian steps—knowing full well Russia has repeatedly rejected a ceasefire-first approach.
Pressure on Trump: Some see this as Ukraine trying to force Trump away from negotiations and back into the Biden-era military support and sanctions approach.
On Russia, Sanctions, and War Dynamics
Russia Unfazed by Sanctions: Despite years of “crippling” sanctions, Russia’s economy has endured, aided by trade with China, India, and others. Sanctions have failed to weaken Russia meaningfully.
Sanctions Hurt the Poor: Sanctions primarily affect the most vulnerable in the targeted nations while leadership remains insulated.
Negotiations Over Sanctions: The speaker advocates for diplomacy instead of continued reliance on ineffective sanctions.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Trump recently announced the development of a new missile defense system called the Golden Dome, modeled after Israel’s Iron Dome. He claimed it would integrate with current U.S. defenses, be operational within three years, and even intercept missiles from space or across the globe. He emphasized its importance for national survival, noting Canada might join the project.
However, Professor Ted Postol, a former MIT professor and expert in missile defense, strongly criticized the plan, calling it unrealistic and technologically unfeasible. He compared it to Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) or “Star Wars” from the 1980s, which also promised futuristic missile defense but failed due to major technical shortcomings—issues that still persist today.
Postol recounted his experience with SDI, where exaggerated claims, political enthusiasm, and poor scientific validation led to deeply flawed policy decisions. He described how untested and theoretical technologies, like the X-ray laser, were hyped up and presented as game-changers despite never working. This led to what he called a “hallucinatory” policy environment where major Pentagon decisions were driven by fantasy rather than feasibility.
The discussion warns that the Golden Dome may repeat past mistakes: overpromising unproven technology, misleading policymakers, and ultimately wasting resources on a system unlikely to perform as advertised.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The recent meeting in Istanbul between Russia and Ukraine, typically expected to move toward peace, appears to have had the opposite effect. Rather than progressing toward an end to the conflict, both sides presented proposals that made a negotiated settlement even more unlikely, signaling a continuation—and possible escalation—of the war.
Colonel Douglas Macgregor argues that:
The summit was a charade: He believes only Russia is serious about ending the war, while Ukraine’s leadership is entrenched in denial and pursuing unattainable goals.
Ukraine's military is collapsing: Citing massive casualties (upwards of 1.5 million dead) and recent resignations from high-ranking Ukrainian military officials, Macgregor contends that Ukrainian forces are on the verge of collapse.
Zelensky's strategy is to drag in the U.S. militarily: Like Netanyahu in Israel, Zelensky is not seeking peace but rather trying to provoke deeper American military involvement by painting a narrative of strength and momentum.
Drone attacks inside Russia (e.g., Operation Spiderweb) are described as symbolic and aided by U.S. and UK intelligence, but militarily insignificant.
Zelensky’s demands (Russia gets nothing, no territorial concessions) are viewed as delusional and designed to make peace talks impossible.
The West, particularly Washington, is focused on optics: The real strategy is shaping perceptions to keep support flowing, even if the reality on the battlefield is bleak.
In conclusion, Macgregor suggests that current diplomacy is performative and detached from battlefield realities, with the primary goal being to manipulate Western narratives and keep international support for Ukraine alive, despite the crumbling situation on the ground.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Key Points:
Ukrainian Drone Attacks:
Ukraine targeted five Russian air bases, destroying at least 13 strategic bombers (e.g., TU-95s).
Ukraine spent 18 months preparing the attack, even smuggling and assembling equipment inside Russia.
Despite media hype, the Russian military capability remains largely intact; they have ~87 strategic bombers, so operational capacity is not significantly affected.
Western Media & Zelensky's Narrative:
Zelensky claimed the operation was a major success and a turning point, pushing Russia toward diplomacy.
The speaker criticizes Western media for overstating Ukraine’s successes and underreporting Russian advances.
Satellite imagery disproved earlier Ukrainian claims that 41 Russian aircraft were destroyed.
Peace Talks & Diplomatic Reality:
Zelensky claimed Ukraine forced Russia into peace talks, but the speaker counters that Putin proposed direct talks on May 11.
Russia has long expressed interest in negotiations (dating back to 2014 and the Minsk agreements), whereas Zelensky passed a law banning negotiations with Putin.
Military Reality on the Ground:
Russia has been gaining territory steadily since October 2023.
Ukraine is losing troops and lacks the manpower and industrial capacity for a long war of attrition.
Tactical victories like "Spiderweb" have limited strategic impact if not backed by broader battlefield success.
Criticism of Western Support:
The speaker argues the West, particularly Europe and the U.S., continues to support Ukraine based on idealistic or misleading narratives, rather than hard strategic calculations.
Suggests the West should focus on its own interests, not blindly back Ukraine.
Zelensky’s European Tour:
Zelensky attended a summit in Vilnius, continuing to pitch Ukraine as the defender of Europe and highlighting the superiority of Western and Ukrainian weapons.
The speaker views this as emotional rhetoric rather than a reflection of strategic reality.
Conclusion:
The speaker urges a reality-based assessment of the war, challenging overly optimistic Ukrainian and Western claims. While Ukraine’s drone strike was tactically impressive, it does not alter the strategic trajectory of the war, in which Russia continues to advance and maintain overwhelming advantages.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Recent Strikes: Ukraine carried out strikes shortly before peace talks in Istanbul, which may provoke a harsher Russian response.
Negotiation Dynamics: Ukraine expected Russia to share its memorandum before the meeting, but Russia insists it will only share it during the talks.
Russia's Stance: Russian officials have clearly stated this may be the last chance for a diplomatic solution. If not accepted, Russia will aim to win militarily.
Power Imbalance: The speaker highlights Russia's superiority in manpower, equipment, and resources, arguing Ukraine cannot realistically win on the battlefield.
Possibility of Escalation: The speaker suggests Russia might replace the memorandum with an ultimatum and warns of the possibility of a large-scale military escalation.
Western Influence: There is speculation that some Western powers and possibly Zelensky might want to prolong the war to avoid a negotiated settlement that favors Russia, especially ahead of a potential Trump presidency.
U.S. Military Aid Limits: The U.S. has signaled it cannot continue supplying Ukraine at previous levels, contradicting any hopes for renewed heavy support.
Russian Restraint and Future Targets: Russia has seemingly held back from hitting major Ukrainian political and intelligence targets, but that may change in retaliation for the recent attacks.
Overall, the tone is critical of Ukraine and the West, portraying Russia as being methodical and serious about forcing an end to the war on its terms.Explore the podcast
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Military Situation & Strategy:
Russia's gains on the battlefield are not just about territory but about weakening Ukraine's armed forces through a war of attrition.
The Ukrainian defensive lines are thinning, while Russia maintains a numerical advantage and continues to reinforce.
Russia uses missiles, drones, artillery, and glide bombs to target Ukrainian manpower and logistics.
Russian Strategy:
Russia is focused on winning the war, not negotiating, unless on its terms.
Their doctrine prioritizes manpower destruction over territorial gain.
The Kremlin is acting consistently at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels to achieve total victory.
Diplomatic Developments:
A potential peace negotiation is being discussed for June 2 in Istanbul, but Ukraine hasn’t confirmed participation.
Trump administration claims to support negotiations, encouraging both sides to talk.
The U.S. is not participating directly in this upcoming meeting, potentially signaling a shift toward stepping back.
Russian Peace Proposal:
Russia plans to bring a memorandum to the talks, likely demanding:
Ukraine's withdrawal from contested territories.
Ukrainian demilitarization and “denazification”.
A guarantee Ukraine will never join NATO.
These terms are non-starters for Ukraine, suggesting no real breakthrough is likely.
U.S. and Western Position:
The U.S. publicly supports a ceasefire, but has said it may withdraw from negotiations if Russia doesn’t cooperate.
The U.S. ambassador to the UN emphasized that peace depends on Russian actions.
Some frustration is expressed that Zelensky shows no signs of compromise, continuing to demand more Western aid without offering diplomatic flexibility.
Overall Outlook:
The conflict remains deadlocked, with little prospect for meaningful negotiations in the short term.
The West, Ukraine, and Russia remain far apart in their goals and expectations.
The speaker criticizes the confusion in Western media and government about Russia's intentions, stating it's obvious they plan to fight until they win or force Ukraine to surrender.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker discusses the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, focusing on upcoming negotiations, military dynamics, and Western involvement:
Upcoming Talks: Russia and Ukraine are set to meet on Monday, June 2. Both sides are preparing "memorandums" outlining their negotiating positions, which are already well-known publicly.
Stalemate in Positions: Russia hasn't changed its demands and sees no reason to. It is not "stalling" but rather continuing its military campaign while leaving the door open for talks under its strict conditions.
Western Misperceptions: The West often accuses Russia of not wanting peace, but both sides continue military actions. Ukrainian attacks inside Russia are usually ignored by Western media, while Russian actions are heavily publicized.
Germany’s Role: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently lifted range restrictions on weapons supplied to Ukraine, allowing them to strike inside Russia. Germany also plans to help Ukraine produce long-range missiles domestically, which the speaker doubts will be successful due to Russian targeting capabilities.
Mutual Escalation: Both Ukraine and Russia are launching drone and missile attacks into each other’s territory. The speaker criticizes Western narratives for only highlighting Russian attacks and ignoring Ukrainian ones, calling it selective and misleading.
Russian Perspective: Russia maintains it is open to negotiations but won't stop fighting unless its conditions are met. Officials warn that strikes on Russia with Western-supplied weapons could lead to retaliation against those supplying countries.
Western Strategy Flawed: Supplying long-range missiles to Ukraine may escalate the war without changing the battlefield dynamics. The speaker argues these weapons haven’t proven effective and may provoke broader conflict, especially if Russia retaliates against Western nations directly.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Trump’s "Deadline" to Putin:
Trump vaguely set a two-week deadline to assess whether Putin is genuinely interested in ending the war in Ukraine. The speaker is skeptical about Trump’s track record with deadlines and his neutrality in this conflict.
Analysis from Larry Johnson (ex-CIA analyst):
Western Media Bias: Johnson criticizes Western media for presenting a one-sided narrative that paints Russia as the sole aggressor while ignoring Ukraine’s missile and drone attacks on Russian territory.
Putin's Peace Terms: Putin is open to a negotiated settlement but only on his terms:
Ukraine must withdraw from all territories Russia claims (and possibly more in the future).
Ukraine must stay out of NATO, and NATO must stop expanding eastward.
Protection for Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine.
Escalating Demands: Putin's conditions are hardening, not softening. He's expanding territorial demands beyond those annexed in 2022.
No Western Leverage: Johnson asserts that the West has no leverage over Putin and that Russia has lost trust in Western negotiations.
Trump’s Role: Johnson criticizes Trump’s claim of neutrality, noting he contributed to the conflict by sending weapons to Ukraine and supporting militarization.
Ukraine’s Position: Zelensky has rejected any withdrawal from currently held Ukrainian territories, making Putin’s conditions non-starters. Johnson argues that Ukraine doesn’t genuinely want peace if they refuse those terms.
Historical Context: Johnson traces the roots of the conflict to NATO expansion and U.S. support for insurgents against Russia starting in the 1990s. He suggests Putin has patiently prepared for this confrontation.
Military Activity: Johnson notes a large Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine on May 24–25 was retaliation for Ukraine launching over 1,400 drones at Moscow in the prior week.
Civilian Casualties: He claims the low number of civilian casualties from Russian strikes suggests they are not targeting civilians, unlike Ukraine.
Tone and Perspective:
The discussion is heavily critical of the U.S., NATO, and Ukraine.
It portrays Russia as reactive rather than aggressive.
The speaker emphasizes underreported facts from the Russian perspective.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Putin Trump: The DEEPENING DIVIDE /Lt Col Daniel Davis
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Combat Conditions and Tactics
Both Russian and Ukrainian soldiers are engaged in slow, brutal fighting often carried out house by house, due to the risk posed by drones and artillery.
Small infantry teams (2-4 soldiers) are common, as large groups are vulnerable to single drone or artillery strikes.
Soldiers operate in trench lines, dugouts, or abandoned buildings, moving cautiously due to near-constant aerial surveillance and attacks.
Drone Warfare
Drones are ubiquitous and lethal. They're used for:
Reconnaissance
Direct attacks (e.g., one drone per soldier)
Logistics (e.g., delivering food, water, and ammo to the front lines)
Anti-drone tactics include:
Netting over roads and vehicles
Electronic warfare (effective against some, but not all, drones)
Drones have changed warfare from large-scale maneuvers to micro-tactical engagements.
Environmental Factors
Weather and seasons significantly affect drone operations.
Rain, snow, or high winds can ground drones.
Foliage in summer offers cover; bare landscapes in winter increase exposure.
Resupply Challenges
Resupplying front-line troops is dangerous and often done via drones.
Delivering essentials like food or ammo can require multiple drone trips, increasing the difficulty and slowing operations.
Casualties and Strategic Objectives
Russia is making slow but steady territorial gains.
Their strategy prioritizes destroying Ukrainian forces over taking land.
Ukraine is suffering disproportionately high casualties, largely due to inferior firepower and fewer drones.
Russian superiority in glide bombs, missiles, and artillery contributes to this imbalance.
Tactical Map and Changes Over Time
In 2023, Ukraine had near tactical parity with fortified positions and mutually supporting defenses.
By 2024–2025, many of these positions have been lost, with Russian forces advancing and Ukrainian lines thinning.
Conclusion
The conflict is no longer comparable to past Western wars like Desert Storm or Operation Iraqi Freedom. Instead, it reflects a new kind of warfare dominated by drones, close-quarters combat, and high-tech attrition. The war is a grinding stalemate, with innovation and adaptation playing a critical role in survival and success.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Criticism of Trump and U.S. Leadership:
The speaker argues that Donald Trump has become incoherent and ineffective, drastically changing his stance on Russia and Ukraine in recent months.
Trump is described as failing in leadership both domestically and within NATO.
He is seen as incapable of influencing events meaningfully or acting in America’s best interest.
Despite his past potential to mediate or de-escalate the conflict, he is now viewed as irrelevant or powerless, overshadowed by entrenched U.S. intelligence and political actors.
Russia's Stance and Strategy:
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has made clear that Russia will not accept any peace deal that leaves the Zelensky government in power.
The Russian view is that the Zelensky regime would use a ceasefire to rebuild militarily, continuing the war later.
Regime change in Kyiv is now seen as a necessary outcome for a lasting peace.
Military Developments:
Putin has announced a "buffer zone" in northern Ukraine, suggesting a new front in the war that expands deeply into Ukrainian territory.
Russian military strategy may involve seizing key regions like Odessa, Kharkiv, and pushing to the Dnieper River.
Russian recruitment is exceeding goals, while Ukraine is facing troop shortages and recruitment problems.
Western Inaction and Miscalculation:
The West, especially the U.S., is accused of ignoring or refusing to understand Russian concerns.
There is frustration that Western leaders, including Trump, Macron, and others, have no real stake or understanding of the conflict.
Russia views attempts at negotiations or pressure from the West as insincere and ineffective.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Russia is preparing a major new offensive in the war against Ukraine, potentially decisive in securing a Russian victory. Ukrainian leaders, including President Zelensky, have warned that the offensive could begin as early as June, though mounting evidence suggests it may have already started. The recent Russian drone and missile barrage—reportedly the largest of the war so far, with 350 drones and 9 missiles—has struck key Ukrainian military infrastructure, causing widespread damage and further depleting Ukraine’s already limited air defense resources.
The attacks are aimed at command centers, logistics hubs, and military facilities, weakening Ukraine’s ability to maintain its front lines. If Russia continues at this intensity, Ukraine may soon lack sufficient air defenses, making it more vulnerable to deep strikes that could shift the balance of the war.
In parallel, Germany has authorized Ukraine to use Taurus long-range missiles to strike targets inside Russia. This marks a significant escalation and has provoked strong warnings from Moscow. Russian officials have stated that such strikes would be seen as direct German participation in the war, potentially prompting retaliation.
Russia has repeatedly stated openness to a negotiated peace—but only under strict conditions that reflect its interpretation of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution as a coup and demand demilitarization, political changes, and protections for Russian-speaking populations. However, leaders like Dmitry Medvedev suggest that Russia may prefer outright military victory, which would allow it to impose terms unilaterally.
The situation is escalating on multiple fronts—with military intensity increasing, Western involvement deepening, and the window for diplomacy narrowing. The conflict may soon reach a critical turning point.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The situation in Ukraine is dire and increasingly favors Russia. They claim that:
Russia is strong and growing: Militarily and industrially, Russia is in good shape, with the capacity to sustain and expand the war. They are outproducing Ukraine and the West in weapons, artillery, and manpower.
U.S. and Western policy is delusional: Despite evidence of Russia's growing strength, many Western political and military figures—like John Bolton and British commentators—are still claiming Russia is weakening or about to collapse, which the speaker calls detached from reality.
Trump may be walking away: The speaker interprets Trump’s recent Truth Social post as a possible signal he may stop engaging in the Ukraine conflict, distancing himself from Biden, Zelensky, and Putin, whom he blames for the war.
Western leadership is ignoring reality: The speaker criticizes the West for ignoring Russia’s consistent war aims (e.g., demilitarization of Ukraine, neutrality, constitutional changes), and continuing to fund a losing war. This, they argue, benefits only the defense industry, not the broader Western economies or societies.
Calls for honesty and accountability: The speaker emphasizes that promoting illusions about Ukraine’s capabilities only prolongs suffering and wastes resources. They advocate for spreading “truth,” claiming only a negotiated settlement—on Russian terms—can end the war.
The speaker concludes with a call for viewers to share the video to combat what they see as dangerous misinformation from mainstream media and Western officials.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker discusses insights from a visit to Russia and conversations with influential figures, emphasizing a hardened Russian stance on the Ukraine war. The military-industrial leadership, though not traditional soldiers, supports Medvedev’s hardline position on achieving an unconditional surrender from Ukraine, drawing parallels to World War II sentiments. Despite the impact of Western sanctions on their businesses, they remain supportive of the Russian government’s position.
There is a broad consensus among Russians—and some voices from countries like India and Angola—that the conflict stems from Western overreach, not Russian aggression. These international voices often view the war as a disruption to the global order and would prefer a negotiated settlement, though they may accept Ukraine’s loss if it occurs, blaming the West for the outcome.
Medvedev’s rhetoric, often dismissed in the West, reflects a deep and resolute national sentiment. While he voices the uncompromising, militaristic narrative, Putin plays the diplomatic role, keeping the door open to negotiations while still preparing for victory through military means.
On the diplomatic front, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov dismissed the idea of a ceasefire preceding peace talks, insisting on a treaty first and questioning the legitimacy of Ukraine’s leadership. This signals that Russia is not interested in Western-led frameworks for peace unless its maximalist demands, including political restructuring in Ukraine, are met.
In conclusion, the dominant Russian view is one of resolve and inevitability—a belief that victory will be achieved through sustained effort and that current Western diplomacy misunderstands Russia's long-term goals and public sentiment.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
John Mearsheimer: Putin Orders BUFFER ZONE /U.S. Dazed & Confused
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
- Visa fler
