Avsnitt

  • The Book of Genesis tells of two different creation stories. One focuses on the world's creation in six days and the sanctification of the seventh day, on which God rested from His work of creation.

    In the previous episode, we discussed how this story forms the basis for many social laws, teaching that social order is an organic part of the order of the world's creation.

    The second creation story focuses on violating God's prohibition against eating from the fruit of the 'Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil', which we refer to here as a "Perfect Crime."

    The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which God planted in the Garden of Eden, had two miraculous qualities, not found in any other tree. The first is embodied in the tree's name: The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

    According to the Bible, knowledge has only one meaning and purpose: the ability to recognize God's existence, to hear and understand His words and laws.

    Had man not eaten from the fruit that gave him this ability, nothing would have distinguished human beings from all the other animals God created.

    If so, what logic explains the severe prohibition against eating this excellent fruit?

    The answer is that the second quality of the fruit was death. And so, God said to the first man:

    "for when you eat from it you will certainly die."

    The ancients believed, and so in the Bible, in different degrees of impurity, the most severe among them being the body of a dead person.

    The ancients believed that the impurity created in the body of a dead person was drawn like a magnet to the temples they built to honor the gods they believed in.

    The impurity that originates in the dead human body contaminates the temple and causes the gods to be expelled from it.

    This belief also exists in the Bible!

    There is no dispute that the garden planted by God was the holiest and purest place on earth, and therefore the most vulnerable to impurity.

    To maintain the absolute purity of this wondrous garden, no one was born or died in it. As a result, life in the garden took place in a sterile frozen capsule, that was hermetically sealed.

    To set the wheels of the real world in motion, the first couple had to eat the forbidden fruit!

    And the moment they did so, two things happened simultaneously.

    The first was that their DNA, and that of all their descendants, was forever changed.

    Thanks to eating from the forbidden fruit, of all the creatures God created, only humans are capable of recognizing His existence, and only to them did He give laws and commandments.

    However, impurity, especially the impurity created in a dead body, became an inherent part of humanity. From this fact, it is clear that to maintain the purity of the Garden of Eden, God had to expel the first couple from the holy garden, along with all the animals.

    The second result of the "perfect crime" was that the real world, which is far from being idyllic and pure, where people are born and die, began its long journey.

    Finally, we have one more comment:

    According to the Bible, the Garden of Eden was on earth, but in Jewish and Christian tradition, the garden resides in heaven.

    We will discuss in the future how the garden ascended to blue sky and became the dwelling place for the souls of the righteous dead.

  • The Book of Genesis opens with two stories that tell how God created the world.

    The first recounts that God created the world in six days and sanctified the seventh day since He rested from the work of creation.

    The second story focuses on the deed that led to the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden, which we will discuss in the next episode.

    The episode before us is dedicated to the first creation story, where the fact that God created the world in six days and rested on the seventh, forms a legal foundation for many revolutionary laws, unknown to the ancient world, which are an integral part of the creation of the world.

    Based on the creation story, the legislator, who according to the Bible is always God, divided the infinite sequence of days into three portions.

    The first portion is of seven days, consisting of six workdays followed by a day of rest, to which all humans and working animals are entitled. In every respect, this is the most advanced social law in human history!

    The second portion is seven years, and it refers to what the Bible calls a "Hebrew slave," who fell into a severe economic crisis that forced him to take a loan that he could not repay.

    To pay his debt, he had to mortgage his land, and if that was not enough, then he and his wife were forced to pay their debt by working for the lender. In practice, they became slaves for six years – and in the seventh year, they were set free.

    The third division expands the second division, and it is 49 years, which is a multiple of 7 times 7 years.

    We said that a person who took a loan he could not repay was forced to mortgage his land and his labor to the lender. We also said that he and his wife were set free in the seventh year, but in this case, his land remained mortgaged and continued to pay the old debt.

    A person who was set free, but whose land remained mortgaged, could never recover economically – and the third division addresses this situation.

    If the land was not released earlier, then it was released after 49 years and returned to its original owner, who was likely no longer alive. But his children and grandchildren were alive, and returning land allowed them to rehabilitate their economic lives.

    The story that God created the world in six days and rested on the seventh is not as banal as many think. A broad reading reveals that all the social laws scattered throughout the Bible are an organic part of the creation and that they were intended to create a society where everyone is equal before the law. A just society that has compassion for the weak.

  • Saknas det avsnitt?

    Klicka här för att uppdatera flödet manuellt.

  • The Book of Ruth is considered the most beautiful story in the Bible and one of the most beautiful short stories ever written.

    Ruth's story takes place around 1100 BCE when Israeli society was still tribal. A tribe was a cluster of extended families living in the tribe's territory, maintaining mutual responsibility and protecting their people.

    During one of the drought years that afflicted Israel, Elimelech, Naomi's husband from the tribe of Judah, fell into heavy debt. To pay his debt, Elimelech had to mortgage his land, and he, Naomi, and their two sons, Mahlon and Chilion, left their home in Bethlehem to live in an ancient land that no longer exists, called Moab.

    In Moab, Mahlon and Chilion married two local girls: Ruth and Orpah. However, shortly after, a great tragedy befell the small family: Elimelech and his two sons passed away, leaving behind three poor and heartbroken widows.

    After the tragedy, Naomi decided to return to Bethlehem, but first, she released her ownership of Ruth and Orpah. Orpah indeed returned to her father's house in Moab, but Ruth tied her fate to Naomi's and arrived with her in Bethlehem.

    To support herself and Naomi, Ruth went to glean ears of grain in one of the wheat fields near Bethlehem, where she met Boaz, the wealthy farmer who owned the field. Boaz and Ruth fell in love, married, and had a son named Obed, who became the grandfather of King David.

    On the surface, this story seems simple, even bland, but the opposite is true. It is a complex legal document written in the form of a story.

    In the three episodes, we dedicate to Ruth's book, we reveal the social and legal system hidden within the story.

    Elimelech, who mortgaged his land to a foreign creditor, pledged a portion of the tribe of Judah's territory. To prevent the tribe's territory from shrinking, one of his relatives was obligated to "redeem his land." That is, to pay the debt and return the land to the possession of the tribe of Judah (which Boaz does in our story).

    We mentioned that before Naomi's return to Bethlehem, she released her ownership of Ruth and Orpah. Naomi did this because, in the Book of Deuteronomy (25), there is a law stating that the widow remained in the possession of her deceased husband's family and that she was not allowed to act as she pleased or remarry on her own accord.

    From the day Naomi released Ruth and Orpah, the familial and legal relationships between her and Ruth ended. Although Ruth stayed with Naomi, this did not change the fact that between the two women who loved each other like mother and daughter, no formal relationships existed anymore, and Ruth did not belong to any tribe or family in Bethlehem. She didn't have any social or legal protection in Israel. Ruth's vulnerable situation explains why Boaz extended his protection to her, and why to secure her future Naomi wanted her to marry Boaz.

    Boaz, who paid Elimelech's debt, did not marry Ruth in a regular marriage, but according to the levirate marriage law. By doing so, the land whose debt he paid made a U-turn and returned to the possession of Elimelech's house. Obed, the son Ruth bore, was formally considered the son of Mahlon, Ruth's first husband, and Naomi's grandson, continuing her family line that had effectively become extinct.

    As we said, on the surface, Ruth's book seems naive. In reality, this story is a fascinating, genius creation because the many laws contained within it form an integral part of the story. Those who read the story without understanding tribal society and its laws read a beautiful but flat story lacking any depth.

  • The Book of Ruth is considered the most beautiful story in the Bible and one of the most beautiful short stories ever written.

    Ruth's story takes place around 1100 BCE when Israeli society was still tribal. A tribe was a cluster of extended families living in the tribe's territory, maintaining mutual responsibility and protecting their people.

    During one of the drought years that afflicted Israel, Elimelech, Naomi's husband from the tribe of Judah, fell into heavy debt. To pay his debt, Elimelech had to mortgage his land, and he, Naomi, and their two sons, Mahlon and Chilion, left their home in Bethlehem to live in an ancient land that no longer exists, called Moab.

    In Moab, Mahlon and Chilion married two local girls: Ruth and Orpah. However, shortly after, a great tragedy befell the small family: Elimelech and his two sons passed away, leaving behind three poor and heartbroken widows.

    After the tragedy, Naomi decided to return to Bethlehem, but first, she released her ownership of Ruth and Orpah. Orpah indeed returned to her father's house in Moab, but Ruth tied her fate to Naomi's and arrived with her in Bethlehem.

    To support herself and Naomi, Ruth went to glean ears of grain in one of the wheat fields near Bethlehem, where she met Boaz, the wealthy farmer who owned the field. Boaz and Ruth fell in love, married, and had a son named Obed, who became the grandfather of King David.

    On the surface, this story seems simple, even bland, but the opposite is true. It is a complex legal document written in the form of a story.

    In the three episodes, we dedicate to Ruth's book, we reveal the social and legal system hidden within the story.

    Elimelech, who mortgaged his land to a foreign creditor, pledged a portion of the tribe of Judah's territory. To prevent the tribe's territory from shrinking, one of his relatives was obligated to "redeem his land." That is, to pay the debt and return the land to the possession of the tribe of Judah (which Boaz does in our story).

    We mentioned that before Naomi's return to Bethlehem, she released her ownership of Ruth and Orpah. Naomi did this because, in the Book of Deuteronomy (25), there is a law stating that the widow remained in the possession of her deceased husband's family and that she was not allowed to act as she pleased or remarry on her own accord.

    From the day Naomi released Ruth and Orpah, the familial and legal relationships between her and Ruth ended. Although Ruth stayed with Naomi, this did not change the fact that between the two women who loved each other like mother and daughter, no formal relationships existed anymore, and Ruth did not belong to any tribe or family in Bethlehem. She didn't have any social or legal protection in Israel. Ruth's vulnerable situation explains why Boaz extended his protection to her, and why to secure her future Naomi wanted her to marry Boaz.

    Boaz, who paid Elimelech's debt, did not marry Ruth in a regular marriage, but according to the levirate marriage law. By doing so, the land whose debt he paid made a U-turn and returned to the possession of Elimelech's house. Obed, the son Ruth bore, was formally considered the son of Mahlon, Ruth's first husband, and Naomi's grandson, continuing her family line that had effectively become extinct.

    As we said, on the surface, Ruth's book seems naive. In reality, this story is a fascinating, genius creation because the many laws contained within it form an integral part of the story. Those who read the story without understanding tribal society and its laws read a beautiful but flat story lacking any depth.

  • The Book of Ruth is considered the most beautiful story in the Bible and one of the most beautiful short stories ever written.

    Ruth's story takes place around 1100 BCE when Israeli society was still tribal. A tribe was a cluster of extended families living in the tribe's territory, maintaining mutual responsibility and protecting their people.

    During one of the drought years that afflicted Israel, Elimelech, Naomi's husband from the tribe of Judah, fell into heavy debt. To pay his debt, Elimelech had to mortgage his land, and he, Naomi, and their two sons, Mahlon and Chilion, left their home in Bethlehem to live in an ancient land that no longer exists, called Moab.

    In Moab, Mahlon and Chilion married two local girls: Ruth and Orpah. However, shortly after, a great tragedy befell the small family: Elimelech and his two sons passed away, leaving behind three poor and heartbroken widows.

    After the tragedy, Naomi decided to return to Bethlehem, but first, she released her ownership of Ruth and Orpah. Orpah indeed returned to her father's house in Moab, but Ruth tied her fate to Naomi's and arrived with her in Bethlehem.

    To support herself and Naomi, Ruth went to glean ears of grain in one of the wheat fields near Bethlehem, where she met Boaz, the wealthy farmer who owned the field. Boaz and Ruth fell in love, married, and had a son named Obed, who became the grandfather of King David.

    On the surface, this story seems simple, even bland, but the opposite is true. It is a complex legal document written in the form of a story.

    In the three episodes, we dedicate to Ruth's book, we reveal the social and legal system hidden within the story.

    Elimelech, who mortgaged his land to a foreign creditor, pledged a portion of the tribe of Judah's territory. To prevent the tribe's territory from shrinking, one of his relatives was obligated to "redeem his land." That is, to pay the debt and return the land to the possession of the tribe of Judah (which Boaz does in our story).

    We mentioned that before Naomi's return to Bethlehem, she released her ownership of Ruth and Orpah. Naomi did this because, in the Book of Deuteronomy (25), there is a law stating that the widow remained in the possession of her deceased husband's family and that she was not allowed to act as she pleased or remarry on her own accord.

    From the day Naomi released Ruth and Orpah, the familial and legal relationships between her and Ruth ended. Although Ruth stayed with Naomi, this did not change the fact that between the two women who loved each other like mother and daughter, no formal relationships existed anymore, and Ruth did not belong to any tribe or family in Bethlehem. She didn't have any social or legal protection in Israel. Ruth's vulnerable situation explains why Boaz extended his protection to her, and why to secure her future Naomi wanted her to marry Boaz.

    Boaz, who paid Elimelech's debt, did not marry Ruth in a regular marriage, but according to the levirate marriage law. By doing so, the land whose debt he paid made a U-turn and returned to the possession of Elimelech's house. Obed, the son Ruth bore, was formally considered the son of Mahlon, Ruth's first husband, and Naomi's grandson, continuing her family line that had effectively become extinct.

    As we said, on the surface, Ruth's book seems naive. In reality, this story is a fascinating, genius creation because the many laws contained within it form an integral part of the story. Those who read the story without understanding tribal society and its laws read a beautiful but flat story lacking any depth.

  • Part III

    Tamar was about 11 years old when she married Er, Judah's firstborn son. Shortly after their marriage, God put Er to death. As required by the levirate marriage law, Judah married her to Onan, his second son, whom God also put to death. According to this law, Judah was supposed to marry her to Shelah, his third son, when he reached marriageable age.

    During the years Tamar waited for Shelah, she was considered a married woman. Therefore, if she had sexual relations with another man, she would have been considered an adulteress and would have been executed.

    However, when Shelah reached marriageable age, Judah decided not to marry Tamar to him, nor to release his ownership of her - and in doing so, he turned Tamar into an "anchor wife".

    When Tamar realized she had no way out, she deliberately violated one of the most severe incest prohibitions in the book of Leviticus. She seduced Judah to sleep with her, and to become pregnant by him - and so it was.

    As required by the terrible crime she committed, Judah intended to have her executed by burning. However, at the last minute, just before she was thrown into the fire, Judah admitted her righteousness - and Judah's confession, which represents the Bible's stance, sets a supreme moral standard!

    The story of Judah and Tamar raises a long series of social, moral, legal, and theological questions, that we will deal with in this series.

    In the first two episodes (10-11) of the series, we will focus on the social and legal questions that arise from their story. In the third episode, we will focus on the theological aspect of the story.

    The first two episodes deal with the legal status of a woman whose husband passed away before they had children.

    We will address the question of why the widow remained in the custody of her deceased husband's family, and what levirate marriage is, which obligated Judah to marry Tamar to his second son, and after his death, to marry her to his third son.

    In the eyes of someone living in the modern society of the 21st century, this is a strange, arbitrary, and inconceivable law. However, the levirate marriage law is an ancient progressive law, designed to benefit the deceased, his family - and above all, his widow.

    The question of what an "anchor wife" is, will also occupy us. According to the Bible, the fact that Judah anchored Tamar justifies the horrific incest she committed when she became pregnant by him. Indeed, instead of being punished, Tamar received a great reward for the terrible crime she committed!

    We must not forget that the Bible is a theological book that reflects God's will for the Israelites. The fact that the Bible stands by Tamar's side sets a supreme moral standard, which determines that where the law conflicts with a woman's right to live - the woman's right prevails!

    The third episode of the series (12) focuses on the theological aspect of the story.

    Seemingly, Judah and Tamar were two simple people who lived almost 4,000 years ago. Yet, the truth is that they belonged to an ancient distinguished, and noble lineage, the lineage of David's fathers and mothers, which God chose on the sixth day of creation.

    From a theological perspective, Tamar and Judah were supposed to marry each other and give birth to Perez, who was the next link in this distinguished lineage.

    However, God's plans are hidden, yet they always come true. And Judah, who did not know that Tamar was destined to be his wife, innocently married her to his firstborn son - and therefore God put him to death. And when he married her to his second son, God also put him to death. And if he had married her to his third son, God would have put him to death as well!

    In the third episode we show that in order to fulfill her destiny, Tamar had no choice but to violate the incest prohibitions and become pregnant by Judah - and that is exactly what happened.

  • Part II

    Tamar was about 11 years old when she married Er, Judah's firstborn son. Shortly after their marriage, God put Er to death. As required by the levirate marriage law, Judah married her to Onan, his second son, whom God also put to death. According to this law, Judah was supposed to marry her to Shelah, his third son, when he reached marriageable age.

    During the years Tamar waited for Shelah, she was considered a married woman. Therefore, if she had sexual relations with another man, she would have been considered an adulteress and would have been executed.

    However, when Shelah reached marriageable age, Judah decided not to marry Tamar to him, nor to release his ownership of her - and in doing so, he turned Tamar into an "anchor wife".

    When Tamar realized she had no way out, she deliberately violated one of the most severe incest prohibitions in the book of Leviticus. She seduced Judah to sleep with her, and to become pregnant by him - and so it was.

    As required by the terrible crime she committed, Judah intended to have her executed by burning. However, at the last minute, just before she was thrown into the fire, Judah admitted her righteousness - and Judah's confession, which represents the Bible's stance, sets a supreme moral standard!

    The story of Judah and Tamar raises a long series of social, moral, legal, and theological questions, that we will deal with in this series.

    In the first two episodes (10-11) of the series, we will focus on the social and legal questions that arise from their story. In the third episode, we will focus on the theological aspect of the story.

    The first two episodes deal with the legal status of a woman whose husband passed away before they had children.

    We will address the question of why the widow remained in the custody of her deceased husband's family, and what levirate marriage is, which obligated Judah to marry Tamar to his second son, and after his death, to marry her to his third son.

    In the eyes of someone living in the modern society of the 21st century, this is a strange, arbitrary, and inconceivable law. However, the levirate marriage law is an ancient progressive law, designed to benefit the deceased, his family - and above all, his widow.

    The question of what an "anchor wife" is, will also occupy us. According to the Bible, the fact that Judah anchored Tamar justifies the horrific incest she committed when she became pregnant by him. Indeed, instead of being punished, Tamar received a great reward for the terrible crime she committed!

    We must not forget that the Bible is a theological book that reflects God's will for the Israelites. The fact that the Bible stands by Tamar's side sets a supreme moral standard, which determines that where the law conflicts with a woman's right to live - the woman's right prevails!

    The third episode of the series (12) focuses on the theological aspect of the story.

    Seemingly, Judah and Tamar were two simple people who lived almost 4,000 years ago. Yet, the truth is that they belonged to an ancient distinguished, and noble lineage, the lineage of David's fathers and mothers, which God chose on the sixth day of creation.

    From a theological perspective, Tamar and Judah were supposed to marry each other and give birth to Perez, who was the next link in this distinguished lineage.

    However, God's plans are hidden, yet they always come true. And Judah, who did not know that Tamar was destined to be his wife, innocently married her to his firstborn son - and therefore God put him to death. And when he married her to his second son, God also put him to death. And if he had married her to his third son, God would have put him to death as well!

    In the third episode we show that in order to fulfill her destiny, Tamar had no choice but to violate the incest prohibitions and become pregnant by Judah - and that is exactly what happened.

  • Genesis Chapter 38

    Tamar was about 11 years old when she married Er, Judah's firstborn son. Shortly after their marriage, God put Er to death. As required by the levirate marriage law, Judah married her to Onan, his second son, whom God also put to death. According to this law, Judah was supposed to marry her to Shelah, his third son, when he reached marriageable age.

    During the years Tamar waited for Shelah, she was considered a married woman. Therefore, if she had sexual relations with another man, she would have been considered an adulteress and would have been executed.

    However, when Shelah reached marriageable age, Judah decided not to marry Tamar to him, nor to release his ownership of her - and in doing so, he turned Tamar into an "anchor wife".

    When Tamar realized she had no way out, she deliberately violated one of the most severe incest prohibitions in the book of Leviticus. She seduced Judah to sleep with her, and to become pregnant by him - and so it was.

    As required by the terrible crime she committed, Judah intended to have her executed by burning. However, at the last minute, just before she was thrown into the fire, Judah admitted her righteousness - and Judah's confession, which represents the Bible's stance, sets a supreme moral standard!

    The story of Judah and Tamar raises a long series of social, moral, legal, and theological questions, that we will deal with in this series.

    In the first two episodes (10-11) of the series, we will focus on the social and legal questions that arise from their story. In the third episode, we will focus on the theological aspect of the story.

    The first two episodes deal with the legal status of a woman whose husband passed away before they had children.

    We will address the question of why the widow remained in the custody of her deceased husband's family, and what levirate marriage is, which obligated Judah to marry Tamar to his second son, and after his death, to marry her to his third son.

    In the eyes of someone living in the modern society of the 21st century, this is a strange, arbitrary, and inconceivable law. However, the levirate marriage law is an ancient progressive law, designed to benefit the deceased, his family - and above all, his widow.

    The question of what an "anchor wife" is, will also occupy us. According to the Bible, the fact that Judah anchored Tamar justifies the horrific incest she committed when she became pregnant by him. Indeed, instead of being punished, Tamar received a great reward for the terrible crime she committed!

    We must not forget that the Bible is a theological book that reflects God's will for the Israelites. The fact that the Bible stands by Tamar's side sets a supreme moral standard, which determines that where the law conflicts with a woman's right to live - the woman's right prevails!

    The third episode of the series (12) focuses on the theological aspect of the story.

    Seemingly, Judah and Tamar were two simple people who lived almost 4,000 years ago. Yet, the truth is that they belonged to an ancient distinguished, and noble lineage, the lineage of David's fathers and mothers, which God chose on the sixth day of creation.

    From a theological perspective, Tamar and Judah were supposed to marry each other and give birth to Perez, who was the next link in this distinguished lineage.

    However, God's plans are hidden, yet they always come true. And Judah, who did not know that Tamar was destined to be his wife, innocently married her to his firstborn son - and therefore God put him to death. And when he married her to his second son, God also put him to death. And if he had married her to his third son, God would have put him to death as well!

    In the third episode we show that in order to fulfill her destiny, Tamar had no choice but to violate the incest prohibitions and become pregnant by Judah - and that is exactly what happened.

  • The stories of the Bible, especially those in the Book of Genesis, are very concise, and we discussed the reason for this in episode 5.For the stories to convey more than the words written in them, the writers of the Bible used puns and words with multiple meanings numerous times (synergy). Each meaning plays a crucial role in the story.

    However, wordplay cannot be translated from one language to another, and this limitation is especially evident in literal translations.The names that Leah gave to her sons and her maidservant's sons are not random, but rather names whose meanings illustrate how she improved her status with each birth.

    The meaning of each name shows how the woman, who was hated by her, gradually became a happy and beloved woman.

    Conversely, the meanings of the names that Rachel gave to her sons and her maidservant's sons illustrate the tragic decline of the young and miserable woman. They start from a low place and descend to the grave.

  • In this episode, we tell the story of Jacob and his two wives from two different perspectives: historical and theological.

    The historical part focuses on the marriage practices that were common in the ancient world and explains the reason why Jacob had to work for many years to pay the bride price for Rachel. It also explains why Rachel was considered a "senior wife," while her sister Leah had to get married with the inferior status of a "concubine wife."

    The vulnerability of the barren Rachel and the reason for the hostility she felt towards her sister are also highlighted.

    The theological part of this episode points out that Leah was a "chosen woman," while Rachel was an "ordinary woman." Leah was chosen by God to be the ancient mother of the lineage of priests who belonged to the tribe of Levi, named after her third son, and the ancient mother of King David of the tribe of Judah.

    The fact that Leah was a "chosen woman" explains why in the competition between the two sisters, Rachel always ended up losing. The struggle between the two sisters continued even after their deaths. Saul, the first king of Israel, was a member of the tribe of Benjamin, which was named after Rachel's son. However, the kingship was meant for David, whose ancient mother was Leah.

  • The story of Sarah belongs to her – yet, it also sheds light on the world of other women from four thousand years ago, who are mentioned in the Bible. The story of Sarah’s journey opens a door to the world of women in the Bible, why girls got married when they were eleven or twelve years old, why at the age when our daughters are still studying in elementary school, watching TV or playing on their tablets, the women of the ancient world were already married women? We'll also talk about why the Bible speaks positively of polygamy, and of course, why the status of a barren woman fell to the lowest point on the social ladder.

    The Bible relates that men married wives who belonged to three classes: 'senior women' (or senior wives), concubines, and maidservants. If they took women war captives, they had children with them as well (Deut. 21:10-14). The Bible doesn’t give us an explanation of the difference between these three classes, so we’ll have to do that work ourselves.

  • One day, against all expectations Sarah conceived and gave birth to Isaac. As expected, she took back the special rights of the firstborn from Ishmael and transferred them to her own son. The Old Testament says that one day Sarah saw Ishmael “making merry.” The meaning of the word “making merry” has never been completely clarified. Still, something about Ishmael’s behavior incited Sarah’s anger, and she demanded that Abraham throw him and his mother out of their home.

    It doesn't matter what made Sarah’s blood boil. Even if nothing specific made her angry, she still had to banish Ishmael and Hagar from her home.

  • When Sarah lost all hope of having her own child, she gave Abraham her servant Hagar, so that Abraham would have a son through her.

    Sarah intended to recognize Hagar's son Ishmael as her own son, and to give him the special status that ancient society reserved for the oldest son. She intended for him to be Abraham’s successor, the one who would continue his lineage.

    For example, what right did Sarah have to give her maidservant to Abraham so that she would have a child for her? What were the legal relationships between her and Hagar? What status did Ishmael, the son born to Hagar, have?

    Hagar exploited the fact that she gave birth to Abraham’s firstborn son to mock and humiliate Sarah. She felt that the pregnancy had turned the hierarchy of Abraham’s household upside down. Hagar was now in the superior position, able to mock Sarah for her barrenness.

  • According to the biblical story, God gave Abraham the mission to go on the journey, and so Abraham is the hero of the journey. God didn’t give Sarah any mission, so she was relegated to the sidelines. The main thing we remember about her is that she was barren. Abraham was righteous, and Sarah was barren!

    But although God didn’t give Sarah any mission, she walked beside Abraham throughout the entire journey. She climbed mountains with him. She walked with him over the razor-sharp stones on the days they crossed the Sinai Desert. She survived snowstorms and sandstorms at his side, and together with him, she suffered from the very limited food supply.

    Sarah lived in a world in which a woman’s sole role was to bear children for her husband.

    Sarah did not fulfill this role. She did not give Abraham a son, and her social status in Abraham’s household fell to the lowest of the low.

  • Twenty years is a very long time to be on the roads – but they fit into one lifetime, just as the Bible says.

    As soon as we’ve proved that the journey passes the feasibility test, we can rule out the argument that it’s an unfounded myth. A myth can’t pass the feasibility test that we specified as a condition for the solution to our biblical riddle.

  • Our goal in episode 2 is to understand what hides behind the names of settlements through which Abraham and Sarah and their family traveled?

    In order to answer these questions, we opened atlases and calculated the distance between the places that Abraham and Sarah, passed through on the journey, from beginning to end. According to our calculations, the three walked some 2175 miles or 3500 kilometers. We also checked the topography and the climate conditions they faced at each of the stops along the way.

  • According to the book of Genesis, the journey was divided into two parts. The first part was led by Terach, Abraham's father, but he died in Haran. After his death, Abraham, Sarah, and Lot, continued their journey to the Land of Israel, which in 1800 BCE was called Canaan.In Episode 1, we ask what might have motivated Terach to leave Ur of the Chaldees and begin the journey to the land of Canaan?Because God never appeared to Terach and never commanded him to do anything, the journey began for a mundane reason and not as a The answer we give to this question lies in the economic life of the ancient world. These were poor immigrants who left their land, hoping to go to a new place where they would find new economic opportunities. For thousands of years, immigrants have left their lands for economic reasons. Thus we may assume that this was the case here as well.

  • Welcome to the Biblical Times Podcast!

    In the enthralling world of the Biblical Times Podcast, listeners embark on a journey through the rich tapestry of biblical history and its profound impact on contemporary faith and society. At the helm of this enlightening series is Dr. Liora Ravid, a distinguished scholar with a Ph.D. in biblical studies. Dr. Ravid stands out in the academic field for her specialized knowledge in the historical, societal, and legal customs of the era chronicled in the Old Testament.