Avsnitt
-
We've talked about the mexican cartels and their move south into Colombia multiple times now on the podcast, but due to a recent leak in Colombia, we are getting confirmation of those assertions.
According to the leak, CJNG and Sinaloa have both established beachheads in Colombia and both groups continue to work towards complete domination of the narco game. From the harvesting to the sale, both CJNG and Sinaloa are looking to control the game from the bottom up.
In this episode, we take a look at the newest leaks and how the cartels and their corrupt pals in government planned on making it happen.
(commercial at 8:11)
to contact me:
[email protected]
soruce;
Así fue como el Cártel de Sinaloa y el CJNG expandieron su control en Colombia, según NarcoFiles - Infobae -
The battle for supremacy within the Sinaloa cartel has been amped up to the maximum in the aftermath of Ovidio Guzman's arrest. According to sources, it was El Mayo Zambada who told the authorities where they could find Ovidio. If true, it will see a whole new phase of violence erupt in Mexico.
(commercial at 6:36)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
El Chapo's son 'betrayed' by his dad's right-hand man who gave secret location to army - Daily Star -
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
In our latest dive into the court filings, we take a look at the Door Dash warrant and the other documents pertaining to it.
(commercial at 7:35)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
030723 Order to Seal Redact - DoorDash Inc.pdf (idaho.gov) -
Our dive into the Epstein court documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the allegations made against the Jeffrey Epstein estate by Mary Doe.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org) -
Our dive into the Epstein court documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the allegations made against the Jeffrey Epstein estate by Mary Doe.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org) -
Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (Mass. R. Crim. P. 17) outlines the procedures for subpoenas in criminal cases within the Massachusetts court system. Here's a detailed summary of its key provisions:
Authority and Purpose: Rule 17 derives its authority from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and is designed to facilitate the production of evidence and the summoning of witnesses in criminal proceedings.Issuance of Subpoenas: The rule allows for the issuance of subpoenas by the clerk of the court, a notary public, or any attorney authorized to practice law in Massachusetts. Subpoenas may be issued for the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents or other tangible evidence.Form and Content: Subpoenas must be issued in writing and must command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony, or to produce specified documents or tangible things, at a specified time and place.Service of Subpoenas: Subpoenas may be served by any person who is not a party to the case and who is at least 18 years old. Service may be made by delivering a copy of the subpoena to the person named in it, or by leaving a copy at their residence with a person of suitable age and discretion.Witness Fees and Mileage: Witnesses who comply with a subpoena are entitled to receive witness fees and mileage reimbursement as provided by law.Protection of Persons Subject to Subpoenas: Persons subject to subpoenas may seek protection from undue burden or harassment by filing a motion with the court. The court may quash or modify a subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive.Contempt for Failure to Obey Subpoena: Failure to obey a subpoena without reasonable excuse may result in a finding of contempt by the court. Contempt may be punished by fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions.Service of Subpoenas Outside the Commonwealth: The rule provides procedures for the service of subpoenas outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Service of Subpoenas on Behalf of the Commonwealth: When the Commonwealth is the party seeking evidence or witnesses, subpoenas may be issued and served by any attorney authorized to represent the Commonwealth.Notice to Parties: The rule requires that notice of the issuance of a subpoena must be given to all parties in the case.Overall, Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 is designed to ensure the efficient and fair gathering of evidence and witness testimony in criminal cases, while also providing protections for individuals subject to subpoenas. It establishes clear procedures for the issuance, service, and enforcement of subpoenas within the Massachusetts court system.
As we continue to get prepared for the Karen Read trial that kicks off April 29th, we are now takign a look at the Commonwealth's memorandum in opposition to defendants motion pursusant to rule 17 of criminal precedure directed to Brian Albert, Verizon and AT&T.
(commercial at 7:27)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
PDF.COMMONWEALTH - Google Drive -
Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (Mass. R. Crim. P. 17) outlines the procedures for subpoenas in criminal cases within the Massachusetts court system. Here's a detailed summary of its key provisions:
Authority and Purpose: Rule 17 derives its authority from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and is designed to facilitate the production of evidence and the summoning of witnesses in criminal proceedings.Issuance of Subpoenas: The rule allows for the issuance of subpoenas by the clerk of the court, a notary public, or any attorney authorized to practice law in Massachusetts. Subpoenas may be issued for the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents or other tangible evidence.Form and Content: Subpoenas must be issued in writing and must command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony, or to produce specified documents or tangible things, at a specified time and place.Service of Subpoenas: Subpoenas may be served by any person who is not a party to the case and who is at least 18 years old. Service may be made by delivering a copy of the subpoena to the person named in it, or by leaving a copy at their residence with a person of suitable age and discretion.Witness Fees and Mileage: Witnesses who comply with a subpoena are entitled to receive witness fees and mileage reimbursement as provided by law.Protection of Persons Subject to Subpoenas: Persons subject to subpoenas may seek protection from undue burden or harassment by filing a motion with the court. The court may quash or modify a subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive.Contempt for Failure to Obey Subpoena: Failure to obey a subpoena without reasonable excuse may result in a finding of contempt by the court. Contempt may be punished by fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions.Service of Subpoenas Outside the Commonwealth: The rule provides procedures for the service of subpoenas outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Service of Subpoenas on Behalf of the Commonwealth: When the Commonwealth is the party seeking evidence or witnesses, subpoenas may be issued and served by any attorney authorized to represent the Commonwealth.Notice to Parties: The rule requires that notice of the issuance of a subpoena must be given to all parties in the case.Overall, Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 is designed to ensure the efficient and fair gathering of evidence and witness testimony in criminal cases, while also providing protections for individuals subject to subpoenas. It establishes clear procedures for the issuance, service, and enforcement of subpoenas within the Massachusetts court system.
As we continue to get prepared for the Karen Read trial that kicks off April 29th, we are now takign a look at the Commonwealth's memorandum in opposition to defendants motion pursusant to rule 17 of criminal precedure directed to Brian Albert, Verizon and AT&T.
(commercial at 8:42)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
PDF.COMMONWEALTH - Google Drive -
A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.
In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.
The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.
In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.
(commercial at 7:27)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com) -
A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.
In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.
The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.
In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.
(commercial at 10:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com) -
Bryan Kohberger and his legal team were granted the right to continue with their survey in Idaho in hopes of securing a change of venue for the trial. However, there are many pitfalls that come with this strategy.
In this episode we dive into the gamble by Kohberger and breakdown what it might mean for his overall strategy moving forward.
A survey used by lawyers to request a change of venue could backfire in several ways:
Bias in Survey Sampling: If the survey is conducted among a biased or non-representative sample of the population, it could be challenged by the opposing party as being unfair or manipulated.Public Perception: If the survey becomes public knowledge, it could sway public opinion against the lawyers' desired venue change. For example, if the survey is perceived as biased or manipulative, it could lead to negative publicity for the legal team.Opposing Counsel's Strategy: The opposing counsel could use the survey results to their advantage by arguing against the change of venue. They might question the validity of the survey methodology or present counter-evidence to refute its findings.Court's Scrutiny: The judge overseeing the case may scrutinize the survey methodology and findings, especially if there are doubts about its fairness or accuracy. If the survey is deemed unreliable or biased, it could weaken the lawyers' argument for a change of venue.Prejudicing the Court: If the survey results are presented in a way that seems manipulative or designed to prejudice the court, it could backfire by undermining the lawyers' credibility and damaging their case.Legal Precedent: If the use of surveys for change of venue requests becomes a contentious issue in the case, it could set a precedent that affects future legal proceedings, potentially limiting the use of surveys in similar circumstances.Unintended Consequences: Sometimes, survey results can have unintended consequences or reveal information that was not anticipated. This could lead to unforeseen challenges or complications in the legal strategy.
(commercial at 8:02)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Bryan Kohberger's Lawyer Is Betting on 'Strategic' Move (newsweek.com) -
A request for a summary judgment in court is a legal motion made by one party in a lawsuit, asking the court to decide the case in their favor without going through a full trial. This request is typically made when one party believes that there are no genuine disputes of material fact and that they are entitled to win the case based solely on the law and the facts presented in the pleadings, documents, and evidence that are part of the case.Here's how the process generally works:
Motion for Summary Judgment: The party seeking a summary judgment will file a motion with the court, outlining the legal arguments and presenting evidence to support their claim that there are no material facts in dispute and that they should win the case as a matter of law.Response: The opposing party has the opportunity to respond to the motion, disputing the legal arguments and presenting evidence that suggests there are genuine disputes of material fact that require a trial.Reply (Optional): The party seeking the summary judgment may file a reply to respond to the points made by the opposing party in their response.Hearing: The court may hold a hearing to consider the motion for summary judgment. During the hearing, both parties may present their arguments and evidence orally.Judgment: After reviewing the motion, responses, and evidence, the court will decide whether there are genuine disputes of material fact. If the court finds that no such disputes exist, it may grant the summary judgment in favor of the moving party. If disputes do exist or if there are issues of law that need further consideration, the court will deny the motion, and the case will proceed to trial.Summary judgment can be a way to expedite the resolution of a case when there are no significant factual disputes and the legal issues are clear. However, it's up to the judge to decide whether to grant or deny the motion, and it's not always granted. The judge's decision is typically based on a careful examination of the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties.
After the USVI requested a summary Judgement, Judge Rakoff responsed that he will have an answer for them by the end of September. The trial is scheduled to kick off on October 2nd.
(commercial at 11:25)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
US Virgin Islands seeks judgment against JPMorgan for financing Epstein’s sex trafficking | Courthouse News Service -
Ghislaine Maxwell has brought in Harvey Weinstein's lawyer to try and help win her freedom. However, there is quite the hill for him to climb considering the chargers Maxwell was convicted of and the nature of the crimes she was involved in.
Her new legal team has signaled that they are not going to argue her guilt or innocence (that would be a short arguement) but instead focus on her treatement by the federal government and the fact that she didn't get a fair (according to them) trial.
Let's dive in and see what's up!
(commercial at 9:01)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Ghislaine Maxwell hiring Harvey Weinstein's lawyer in appeal (pagesix.com) -
According to the President of Mexico, Fentanyl is a non issue in his country. It's neither used or cooked in the country and that the issue is an American one. However, it doesn't take much of a dive behind the curtain to see that his statements are just flat out wrong.
In this episode, we see another example of the industrialized levels of Fentanyl production in Mexico and we get an inside look into one of these clandestine labs that's tucked away in a nice, quiet Mexican suburb.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
The Cartel Labs Making Fentanyl for Americans—With Help From China (thedailybeast.com) -
P2P methamphetamine production involves the reduction of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine using red phosphorus and hydroiodic acid. The P2P method is different from the one-pot or shake-and-bake methods, which are also used to produce methamphetamine. In the P2P method, the reaction occurs in a separate vessel, whereas in the one-pot method, all the ingredients are mixed in a single container. This also produces a much stronger version of the drug and that makes it much harder to kick the addiction.
One of the states that has found itself dealing with a large number of people with addiction problems is Oregon and the toll that this new age methampethamine is taking is evident on not only the people but the community as well.
Let's dive in and see what's up!
(commercial at 8:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
OR drug crisis: Now in Oregon, cheaper meth 'rewires your brain,' more potent (koin.com) -
The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the warrant for the Moscow forensics lab.
(commercial at 10:21)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
030723 Order to Seal Redact - Moscow Police Department Forensic Lab.pdf (idaho.gov) -
Alex Murdaugh will be spending the rest of his life in prison after being found guilty of murdering his wife and his son. Although that is certainly the worst of his trouble, it is not all of it.
In this episode, we get an update on the financial portion of the charges against Alex Murdaugh and sources are saying that he will plead guilty to the charges against him.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Alex Murdaugh will plead GUILTY to stealing millions of dollars from clients in first time he admits to a crime as he serves two consecutive life sentences for killing wife Maggie and son Paul | Daily Mail Online -
In Mexico it's expected at this point for the government or at least parts of it to be corrupt. What people do not expect or at least hope doesn't happen is that the rot reaches the very top. According to new reports from a very credible source, that's exactly what's happening in Mexico where AMLO and his ruling party have entered into a partnership with the Sinaloa cartel in order to solidify the ruling parties hold on power.
AMLO and his government have of course denied these reports.
(commercial at 13:01)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
https://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/narco-pact-sinaloa-cartel-and-morena/ -
A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.
In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.
The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.
In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.
(commercial at 8:20)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com) -
Chad Daybell is a former gravedigger and author of apocalyptic novels. He gained notoriety in 2020 in connection with the deaths of his former wife, Tammy Daybell, and his new wife, Lori Vallow Daybell's two children, Tylee Ryan and Joshua "JJ" Vallow. The case has received significant media attention due to its bizarre and complex nature.
Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow were both involved in a doomsday prepper group and shared similar religious beliefs. They married shortly after the deaths of both of their former spouses. The deaths of Tammy Daybell and the two children were initially considered unrelated, but suspicions arose when investigators discovered inconsistencies and strange behavior from Chad and Lori.
Tammy Daybell died in October 2019 under suspicious circumstances, initially attributed to natural causes. However, her body was exhumed after law enforcement began investigating the deaths of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Autopsy results have not been publicly released.
Tylee Ryan, 17, and JJ Vallow, 7, were reported missing in September 2019. Their disappearance sparked a nationwide search. Months later, their bodies were found buried on Chad Daybell's property in Salem, Idaho. Autopsies revealed that Tylee had been dismembered and burned, while JJ had been wrapped in plastic and duct tape.
Chad Daybell was arrested and charged with destruction, alteration, or concealment of evidence after the children's bodies were discovered on his property. Lori Vallow was also arrested and charged with multiple counts, including desertion and nonsupport of dependent children, obstruction, solicitation to commit a crime, and contempt of court.
In this episode recap what went down during day number 11 of the Chad Daybell trial.
(commercial at 10:50)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
LIVE UPDATES | On Day 11 of the Chad Daybell trial, Fremont detective says Chad discussed with Tammy, their children light-dark scales - East Idaho News -
Chad Daybell is a former gravedigger and author of apocalyptic novels. He gained notoriety in 2020 in connection with the deaths of his former wife, Tammy Daybell, and his new wife, Lori Vallow Daybell's two children, Tylee Ryan and Joshua "JJ" Vallow. The case has received significant media attention due to its bizarre and complex nature.
Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow were both involved in a doomsday prepper group and shared similar religious beliefs. They married shortly after the deaths of both of their former spouses. The deaths of Tammy Daybell and the two children were initially considered unrelated, but suspicions arose when investigators discovered inconsistencies and strange behavior from Chad and Lori.
Tammy Daybell died in October 2019 under suspicious circumstances, initially attributed to natural causes. However, her body was exhumed after law enforcement began investigating the deaths of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Autopsy results have not been publicly released.
Tylee Ryan, 17, and JJ Vallow, 7, were reported missing in September 2019. Their disappearance sparked a nationwide search. Months later, their bodies were found buried on Chad Daybell's property in Salem, Idaho. Autopsies revealed that Tylee had been dismembered and burned, while JJ had been wrapped in plastic and duct tape.
Chad Daybell was arrested and charged with destruction, alteration, or concealment of evidence after the children's bodies were discovered on his property. Lori Vallow was also arrested and charged with multiple counts, including desertion and nonsupport of dependent children, obstruction, solicitation to commit a crime, and contempt of court.
In this episode recap what went down during day number 11 of the Chad Daybell trial.
(commercial at 10:50)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
LIVE UPDATES | On Day 11 of the Chad Daybell trial, Fremont detective says Chad discussed with Tammy, their children light-dark scales - East Idaho News - Visa fler
