Avsnitt
-
In this episode of Based Camp, Simone and Malcolm Collins break down The New York Times’ recent coordinated coverage of masculinity and fatherhood. They analyze four pieces that attempt to redefine what it means to be a dad — including a cartoon about a trans father on Father’s Day, a childless writer’s take on “modern” fatherhood, an attack on Scott Galloway’s views on paternity leave, and Ezra Klein’s conversation with Helen Lewis framing the “New Right’s very old vision of men.”
The Collinses argue these articles reveal deep cultural elite contempt for actual fathers and promote unsustainable, self-indulgent views of parenting that prioritize personal identity and emotional affirmation over duty, sacrifice, and long-term human thriving. They explain why pronatalist, traditional approaches to masculinity and fatherhood will inherit the future while progressive narratives collapse under their own contradictions.
Expect sharp cultural analysis, personal parenting stories, and a direct challenge to the mainstream media’s attempt to gaslight men about what fatherhood really is.
Show Notes
@AlexBerenson wrote:
Cannot make this up, either.
@nytimes opinion has had four recent pieces about fatherhood and masculinity, with six authors:
Three women
A trans “man”
Two childless men
Not one father. The cultural elite contempt for dads runs so deep we don’t even get to speak for ourselves.
The four pieces appear to be these recent New York Times Opinion items on fatherhood/masculinity:
* “To My Daughter, My Gender Was Never Complicated” (guest essay in comic-strip form, by Zach Ellams, a trans-identifying parent writing about being a “trans dad” and fatherhood).
* “The Most Important Way That Fatherhood Has Changed” (Father’s Day–timed essay on changing perspectives on fatherhood).
* “This Masculinity Influencer Is Loud and Wrong About Paternity Leave” (criticizing a male influencer’s stance on paternity leave and broader masculinity issues).
* “The New Right’s Very Old Vision of Men” (Opinion video/transcript focusing on men, masculinity and the New Right, featuring journalist Helen Lewis).
“To My Daughter, My Gender Was Never Complicated”
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/21/opinion/trans-dad-parenting-fathers-day.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/21/opinion/trans-dad-parenting-fathers-day.html?unlocked_article_code=1.r1A.oWDB.tcG4utZreGgZ&smid=url-share
This shows a series of cartoon panels about a trans father who underwent surgery at 18 and has lived as a father of a daughter, mostly quite out, for some time.
It’s about how he found self acceptance through parenting (and I love that, because I—Simone—have also experienced that and can totally relate)
The panels include things like:
* His daughter yelling: “HOW DID YOU GROW A MUSTACHE IF YOU WERE A LADY?” at a public school
* His daughter asking about a pre-transition picture of him in an album and asking:
* “Who’s that?”
* “It’s me”
* “Oh. You look cool.”
* “Then or now?”
* “Then.”
* Him worrying about his daughter outing him at school
* “I don’t actually tell everyone I’m trans. I save that for special people”
* Eventually she outs him, saying she wants to grow a beard when she grows up, and when told she can’t, insisting she can because her dad did and he was a girl.
* Her various sick burns
* “You’re slow because you’re old!”
* “Maybe I’ll be like you when I grow up” // “Yeah?” // “Yeah. Really short.”
The Backlash:
* @realBrandonGill: “On Father’s Day, the New York Times decided to promote a cartoon of a woman cosplaying as a father. And they did it for a reason. Because the cultural left knows that the first step to conquering the future is brainwashing the minds of our children— and they’ve realized that strong fathers are the biggest obstacle to that goal. They want to tear the institution of fatherhood down to nothing because, to the left, things that are normal, good, and holy are a threat to their marxist revolution.”
* Matt Taibbi: “Today’s NYT editorial on Father’s Day is an all-timer. Again, don’t know where to put it on the funny-vs-horrifying axis:”
* @EndWokeness: “The New York Times on Father’s Day. We do not hate the media enough.”
* Caitlin Flanagan: “The child’s job was to help the parent feel comfortable with his gender.”
* @AfterTheReset: “Message aside, is it necessary for the cartoons to be ugly, poorly drawn, and unappealing?”
Is this an affront to father’s day?
* Sort of
* Mother’s Day in the modern U.S. sense was founded by Anna Maria Jarvis in the early 1900s to create a solemn “memorial mothers day” honoring the sacrifices and care of individual mothers, inspired directly by her own mother Ann Reeves Jarvis’s wish for such a day and by Ann’s community health and reconciliation work.
* Anna’s drive was rooted in her mother Ann Reeves Jarvis’s work: Ann had organized “Mothers’ Day Work Clubs” in the 1850s to improve sanitation and reduce infant mortality, and later “Mother’s Friendship Day” events to heal divisions between Union and Confederate families after the Civil War. Ann also expressed in a Sunday school prayer that she hoped someone would someday establish a “memorial mothers day” for the “matchless service” mothers render to humanity, a line Anna took as her guiding mission
* In the U.S., Father’s Day is generally credited to Sonora Smart Dodd of Spokane, Washington, who proposed the holiday in 1909 after hearing a church sermon about Anna Jarvis’s newly established Mother’s Day. (her civil war veteran dad raised her and her siblings alone after her mother died).
* I find this really relatable as a parent
* Many of us have peculiarities and a story about how parenting helps with acceptance and getting someone out of their heads is actually really good
* In fact, these panels even demonstrate how the author’s daughter gets him to stop overthinking things
* There’s a panel where she’s like: “I spot something that starts with T!”
* And all he can think of is “trans”
* And he’s like: Termite? Turtleneck? Tiny morsel of wood?”
* And his daughter is like: “TREES.”
“The Most Important Way That Fatherhood Has Changed”
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/15/opinion/fathers-day-fatherhood.html
https://archive.is/Gn93j
In this, Frank Bruni, a (childless) contributing opinion writer who has been on staff at the time for over 25 years, talks about how fatherhood has changed between his dad and his brother’s generations (his brother has three kids in their 20s)
He talks about fathers spending more time with their kids now an cites an article suggesting one reason fertility is lower is that men want to give the kids they do have more attention.
In short, he says modern fatherhood is high effort, high investment, and he says that’s good.
He sort of misses that the investment now isn’t in empowering kids but rather indulging them, and he provides a good example: “Mark encouraged his children to let him in by inviting them to understand him. He made sure that they met and mingled with his adult friends and thus observed how he tended relationships and what they meant to him. He also showed his children his passions.
“I took Frank to a Grateful Dead concert when he was 12,” Mark told me, referring to his oldest son, who, like me, is named after my father. But that outing wasn’t just characteristically ardent Deadhead evangelism (and, well, unorthodox parenting). It reflected Mark’s sustained effort to expand the time that he and Frank spent together. The more hours, the more conversation. The more conversation, the greater the likelihood of serendipitous revelations, real familiarity, deeper connection.”
“This Masculinity Influencer Is Loud and Wrong About Paternity Leave”
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/21/opinion/paternity-leave-debate.html
https://archive.is/Zm4Oy
In this opinion piece, Jessica Grose denounces Scott Galloway’s stance on paternity leave.
It should be noted that Scott Galloway is one of the few progressive-leaning pronatalists out there (center-left liberal or social capitalist rather).
In an interview with Derek Thompson, Galloway said: “I think there should be mandatory maternity leave, because I think the species needs to propagate. I’m not sure there should be mandatory paternity leave. I think it sometimes creates resentment. I think sometimes it’s abused. And so I’m a bit of a capitalist here. I think it’s between the company, but I don’t know if I immediately default to oh, the father needs to be there.”
Grose added: “Galloway also commented that he doesn’t think men should be in the delivery room. “I thought that was so disgusting and unnatural,” he says. When I asked Galloway if he had a response to the backlash he has been getting over these comments, he said over email, “My comments were intentionally provocative in the context of a friendly/snarky conversation with Derek.””
She also noted: “Poor Derek Thompson tried to push back, and launch a defense of parental leave. “Most of the gap between prime age adult male and female earnings is a motherhood penalty. And so one benefit of paternity leave is that it puts men and women on relatively more equal standing,” to which Galloway replies, “By lowering the economic standards of the man?””
She proceeded to cite research finding that “Paid paternity leave in Quebec did not fix the motherhood penalty for women, nor did it substantially hurt men’s economic standards.”
She also attempts to exploit that “not a baby man” aspect of Galloway’s personality:
* “It gets worse. Thompson, who is still glowing from the birth of his second child, shares a very sweet story with Galloway about playing “monster” with his eldest child, a 2-year-old, and how he feels “an enormous upsurge of instinct for how to parent my child.” Thompson adds, “I love discovering a new piece of myself in parenting.”Galloway doesn’t even seem to be listening to Thompson, because his response is, “The bad news is it just sucks for the dad. We pretend to like it.” Galloway thinks dads are full of it “when they say they like babies. They’re awful. As a new dad your job is to make sure moms don’t lose it, “and get some sleep and keep the baby away from bodies of water. That is literally your only two jobs right now, or the only two things that you’re any good at. At about 2 or 3 it starts to get less awful and then by 4 or 5 it almost becomes fun.””
She imposes an implication on Galloway that is unfair: “Scott Galloway is entitled to his feelings about parenting babies, and I’m sure he’s not alone. What I am objecting to is the unsaid implication that it’s super fun for moms all the time, while also talking to a man who seems to be wholeheartedly enjoying his small children.”
She tries to argue that many men like being fathers (implying Galloway is heartless) and that studies show people want supportive partners and that partners who take paternity leave “have higher levels of life satisfaction, better health, better marriages and better relationships to their children”
She writes: “When I asked Galloway if he was familiar with any of this research, he said, “My point wasn’t that paternity leave is bad — it’s that we should be honest about trade-offs and let families make decisions based on their circumstances rather than treating one model as morally superior.””
But then she frames his statement as elitist, writing about how few people have that choice.
She finishes with: “I don’t think it’s unusual for men to find childbirth uncomfortable or scary to watch, and becoming a dad can be a rough transition for many; there’s a whole genre of internet videos of dads passing out in the delivery room. But I don’t think saying that watching women give birth is “disgusting and unnatural” is the best way to start this conversation. Galloway told me in an email, “The broader point I was making — clumsily — is that we should be honest about the different experiences people have rather than prescriptive about what every father must feel or do. Some dads experience profound bonding in the first weeks; others find their stride later. Both are valid.”
I wholeheartedly agree with that sentiment.”
This is exactly why we don’t have very many left-leaning pronatalists.
* On one hand we have a woman who has unreasonable demands for a pet project
* On the other hand we have a man trying to share a relatable view and espouse practical solutions
“The New Right’s Very Old Vision of Men”
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/05/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-helen-lewis-gender-right.html
https://archive.is/kuEGG
This is an episode of the Ezra Klein show with Helen Lewis as they discuss a concept she wrote about and refers to as masculinism.
They open with clips of Bronze Age Pervert and Tucker Carlson yearning for “the ancient Hittite Empire or the ancient Mitanni Empire” and “what we had before Betty Friedan wrote “The Feminine Mystique,” before lifestyle feminism dominated every institution in the West.”
They argue:
* There is a coherent masculinist ideology on the American right that goes far beyond the online “manosphere” provocateurs like Andrew Tate.
* Its central claim: modernity and liberal democracy have “thwarted” true masculinity, which is defined around hierarchy, dominance, risk‑taking, and clear gender roles (male breadwinner, female homemaker).
* Figures like Raw Egg Nationalist, Bronze Age Pervert (Costin Alamariu), Helen Andrews, JD Vance, Doug Wilson, and parts of Heritage’s agenda are all different expressions of this same ideological current.
They talk about various concerns expressed within the sphere of masculinism (from dropping testosterone to boys’ struggles in schools, male suicide, endorcine-disrupting chemicals, sedentary work, etc.)
Their primary criticism of it center around:
* A lack of what they find to be empty or incoherent intellectualism
* Klein keeps finding “less there than I thought”: beneath the grand talk of thymos, Nietzsche and liberal decadence, the arguments often collapse into trivial lifestyle advice (e.g. “throw out your plastic chopping board”) or conspiratorial hormone politics.
* They argue that much of the literature swaps serious argument for trolling, irony and “vibes,” making claims hard to pin down and allowing proponents to dodge accountability for what they’re actually saying.
* The movement’s misogyny
* Historical nostalgia and bad faith use of “the past”
* FAIR.
* They argue the movement builds on mythic, cherry‑picked pasts: a fake 1950s Pleasantville, a sanitized Rome or Sparta, or vague “longhouse” matriarchies that collapse under any concrete historical scrutiny.
* The movement’s contempt for liberal self‑restraint and equality
* They find masculinists overly valorize aggression, domination, and hierarchy
* Klein argues healthy masculinity is a matter of self mastery
* The self-helpishness of the movement
* The looksmaxxing
* The extreme body aesthetics (steroid use)
* Their allegedly exploiting real male distress in exploitative ways
* They say masculinists focus too much on butthurt and hierarchy and not on actual constructive reforms
* Their policy threat
* E.g. pushback on no-fault divorce
* The tone
* Klein emphasizes that the movement’s heroes (like
* Trump and Nick Fuentes) embody disinhibition, cruelty, and narcissism rather than courage, responsibility, or fatherhood; he calls this a “terrible vision” of adulthood and manhood.
Episode Transcript
[00:00:00] Simone Collins: Hello, Malcolm. I’m excited to be speaking with you today, because The New York Times seems to be, in some either organized or unintentional fashion making a stance on what masculinity is, really trying to shape the narrative in a very, like, kind of obvious way.
[00:00:15] Malcolm Collins: Is it, is it bopping your kids?
[00:00:17] Simone Collins: N- no. No, no, no, no. It’s- No, no,
[00:00:19] Malcolm Collins: no, no, no, no, no.
[00:00:20] Simone Collins: They don’t get to- ... the opposite of that. And I started falling down this rabbit hole when I saw this tweet on X at Alex Berenson wrote, “Cannot make this up either. @NYTimesOpinion has had four recent pieces about fatherhood and masculinity with six authors.
[00:00:36] Three women, a trans man, two childless men. Not one father. The cultural elite contempt for dads runs so deep that we don’t even get to speak for ourselves.” He didn’t directly reference all of the four articles in his, his post, so I-
[00:00:54] Malcolm Collins: The trans article was really creepy.
[00:00:56] Simone Collins: The trans article, we we’re gonna go...
[00:00:58] That’s our first one. But I did, I did, I think I found the four of them. There is, “To My Daughter, My Gender Was Never Complicated.” This is the- Trans one that Malcolm alluded to. We’re gonna look at The, The Most Important Way That Fatherhood Has Changed, a Father’s Day themed essay on changing perspectives on fatherhood.
[00:01:17] This masculinity influencer is loud and wrong about paternity leave, which is criticizing Scott Galloway’s stance on paternity leave and broader masculinity issues. Him being a left-leaning pronatalist, and one of the only ones. Mm. So great. Thanks, guys. And then finally, The New Right’s Very Old Vision of Men which is from the Ezra Klein podcast actually, where he has on Helen Lewis.
[00:01:41] So two people I think are great and, but no, they have to talk about basically reframe the entire... They call it, I think, well, we’ll, we’ll get into it. Some, some name that Helen Lewis has chosen for the masculinity, masculinity movement, like raw nationalist and bronze per- pervert and a bunch of other people in our broader space.
[00:02:00] But why they’re like shallow and evil. So this
[00:02:04] Malcolm Collins: is very much- These people are awesome. Hold on. No, the thing is, is we will replace them. None of these people who are whining about what it means to be a dad is a real dad. Well,
[00:02:12] Simone Collins: and you’ll see this actually. And here’s who’s gonna replace them. So what I think is interesting is this, this is their attempt to frame this is what masculinity is or should be.
[00:02:19] This is what fatherwood- fatherhood is or should be. And in so doing, they actually, I think, explain exactly your point, why they are going to be replaced, why they are not going to inherit the future. Ooh. Because the views they express are inherently unsustainable and not going to produce something that helps humans thrive in the end which I think is telling.
[00:02:44] So let’s jive right in to the one that really got X clutching its pearls in such a way that they just burst into powder. To my daughter, my gender was never complicated. This was a series of cartoon panels about a trans father who underwent surgery at 18 and has lived as a father of a daughter mostly, mostly not quite out actually for quite some time.
[00:03:11] And it’s supposed to be- Okay ... this heartwarming story about h- how a parent has found self-acceptance through parenting. And on the surface, like, I really like that because, as you know, I have to give myself grace more now, knowing that our children are a lot like me and that some of the most difficult things about them are traits that are deep from within me, and I have to...
[00:03:34] It’s a whole thing. I like that. But so for those of you just listening, the panels include things like his daughter yelling, .” How did you grow a mustache if you were a lady?” at a public pool where this father is not out. His daughter asking about a pre-transition picture of him in an album and asking, “Who’s that?”.
[00:03:53] And the father says, “It’s me.” “Oh, you look cool. Then or now?” “Then.” [00:04:00] She’s just full of sick burns, honestly. He- Just
[00:04:02] burns ...
[00:04:03] he has some panels about worrying about his daughter outing him at school where she talks about like, “Oh, my mommy, I, I told them how my mommy made a cake for you after your surgery.”
[00:04:14] And he, he says, “I don’t actually tell everyone I’m trans. I save that for special people.” And then eventually she does out him, saying that she wants to grow a beard when she grows up, and when told that she can’t, she insists that she can because her dad did and he was a girl.
[00:04:29] And
[00:04:30] Malcolm Collins: some more- Oh, then it’s not grooming at all.
[00:04:32] Simone Collins: No, I know, I know, I know. Some other sick burns from her that I love-
[00:04:35] Malcolm Collins: I love how they just, they’re, they’re always like, they’re always like this. They’re always like, “We’re not grooming people.” We’re not
[00:04:40] Simone Collins: doing that.
[00:04:40] Malcolm Collins: And then they show an example of a kid growing up in an environment where this is normalized wanting to do it themself,
[00:04:45] Simone Collins: and they don’t- I thought I would marry a woman and have 100 cats and live in a van,
[00:04:49] Malcolm Collins: okay?
[00:04:49] You, like you literally thought the norm was being a lesbian. And, and, and the-
[00:04:52] Simone Collins: I know I did. I really did, ‘cause all my friends
[00:04:55] Malcolm Collins: grew up in San Francisco. You
[00:04:55] Simone Collins: grew
[00:04:55] Malcolm Collins: up in San Francisco. Yeah ... and it’s, you know, I think that one of the things To remember is that grooming is normal to an extent, right? Like, in that everybody grows up into the culture, or often into the culture, th- they’re surrounded by when they’re a kid, and that’s often the culture’s goal.
[00:05:14] This is why at the San Francisco Cho- Choir, you know, they’re saying, “We are coming for your kids.” Because these groups breed at well below replacement rate. The only way they can be stable is by converting children from other cultural groups. Mm. They just need to define this, and those children would normally be groomed into their own healthy culture, right?
[00:05:31] But now they are being parasitized into cultures that their birth culture typically would see as negative. And that by the statistics seems to have negative outcomes in terms of mental health, life happiness, et cetera. But continue.
[00:05:48] Simone Collins: Just two more sick burns from the daughter before we go over the backlash.
[00:05:53] And it, it is, this is really an affront on Father’s Day. She said, “You’re slow ‘cause you’re old.” I, which is just kind of a young person thing to say, but I love it. And at one point she, she told her dad, “Maybe I’ll be like you when I grow up,” and he’s like, “Yeah?” And I think he’s thinking maybe, like, trans like me or something, but she’s like, “Yeah, really short,” which is just delightful.
[00:06:15] This girl is really funny. And I think that, you know, the, the, the parent who was able to notice the humor in these moments is funny. But the backlash, ooh, the, a lot of people on X didn’t like it. @RealBrandonGill wrote, “On Father’s Day, The New York Times decided to pronote- promote a cartoon of a woman cosplaying as a father, and they did it for a reason.
[00:06:35] Because the cultural left knows that the first step to conquering the future is brainwashing the minds of our children, and they’ve realized that strong fathers are the biggest obstacle to that goal. They want to tear the institution of fatherhood down to nothing because to the left, things that are normal, good, and holy are a threat to the Marxist revolution.”
[00:06:56] Matt Taibbi wrote, “Today’s NYT editorial on Father’s Day is an all-timer.” Again, I don’t know where to put it on the funny versus horrifying axis. @EndWokeness wrote, “The New York Times on Father’s Day. We do not hate the media enough.” Caitlin Finne- Flanagan wrote, “The child’s job was to help the parent feel comfortable with his gender.”
[00:07:17] And @AfterTheReset, “Message aside, is it necessary for the cartoons to be ugly, poorly drawn, and unappealing?” And per our episode on communists and terrifyingly badass girls-
[00:07:29] Malcolm Collins: Yes, and now we’re like, “Oh, that’s the point” ... like, that’s why they do it. Yeah. Yeah, but the problem is that they’ve so promulgated it within their culture specifically that the other side is, i- you know, we can compete with our sexy anime girls made with, with AI.
[00:07:43] In fact, you know, why don’t I put in a sexy Simone right now just so everyone can see my-
[00:07:47] Oh, my God. Okay, great ... my hot German anime waifu. Thanks. The, the... I, I think, I think we, we can beat them because we get the sexy art, and we can make it- ... for virtually free. Go to RFAB. By the way, if you’re wondering the model that I [00:08:00] use most for these, it’s RFAB’s GPT model is the one- Oh
[00:08:04] that’s best for the-
[00:08:04] Simone Collins: No way ... producing sexy
[00:08:05] Malcolm Collins: German women. Yeah.
[00:08:06] Simone Collins: Really? Mm-hmm. I’m just so used to GPT art being h- awful. Like, the, the short legs. You know what I’m talking about, the short legs. Did they get over that, I guess?
[00:08:16] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. It’s great. I mean, I, I like... If you’ve liked the images that I show, they’re genuine- Yeah
[00:08:21] GPT, Maybe
[00:08:22] Simone Collins: it’s just better at anime. Hmm.
[00:08:24] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, I, I tell it to do it in an anime style. Yeah. You know, so.
[00:08:28] Simone Collins: Okay.
[00:08:28] Malcolm Collins: Oh,
[00:08:28] Simone Collins: ooh. Hold on,
[00:08:31] Malcolm Collins: buddy. But I mean, if we can fight asynchronous warfare where everything in their world has to be ugly... And I do think the other point that the person made here is really interesting about this- Yeah
[00:08:38] is the piece and the focus was on his daughter affirming his lifestyle.
[00:08:45] Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Like- Which by the way actually i- is an affront to the concept of Father’s Day and Mother’s Day, which isn’t about This is about me. This is my day. These holidays existed to be a memorial to the sacrifice and hard work that parents do.
[00:09:05] Yeah. Not of, like, the affirming role that their children play for them. So Father’s Day was sort of, it was inspired by Mother’s Day- ... which was founded by this woman named Anna Maria Jarvis. She wanted to create- ... a solemn memorial Mother’s Day honoring the sacrifices and care of individual mothers.
[00:09:26] Inspired by her mother, Ann Reeves who had done all sorts of, like, amazing things to help, like, just sort of community works and things like that. But Father’s Day, even more so- ... is really about, like, immense sacrifice to help raise your kids. So Father’s Day was founded by Sonora Smart Dodd of Spokane, Washington, who heard about Mother’s Day-
[00:09:48] and was like, “Hold on,” like, “Dads need this.” ‘Cause her Civil War veteran dad raised her and her siblings alone after her mother died. So this is about dads going above and beyond, sacrificing their happiness and their wellbeing and their sanity to take care of their children. And- Hmm ... yeah, I mean, this is not really, I would say, in the at least original spirit of Father’s Day.
[00:10:09] Even though I find it relatable as a parent I, I do think that our kids teach us how to give grace to ourselves or accept ourselves better, but that’s not what being a parent should be about, ever. It should not be about self-affirmation.
[00:10:25] Malcolm Collins: And, and that’s wild. This reframing of parenthood as an act of self-affirmation,
[00:10:30] Simone Collins: which- And that’s, again, that’s part of the problem.
[00:10:31] Like, again, to the theme of this episode, this is why the progressive left is not going to inherit the future, is because they, they’re not having children out of a sense of duty or obligation, self-sacrifice. They’re having it as, an ef- and even contextualizing it as sort of an indulgent my spiritual journey, my journey of self-acceptance kind of thing.
[00:10:56] And it’s th- this, this, this parent is so in their head about their trans identity, for example. One kid who already wants
[00:11:07] to sterilize
[00:11:08] themselves. There’s even a panel in the, there’s even a panel in the, the, the, she, the, sorry. The, the author includes where the daughter, they’re in a park, and the daughter’s like, “I spot something, it starts with a T.
[00:11:19] Can you guess what it is?” Basically, and the, the father’s like, “Aw.” Like, can only think of trans. Can only think of trans in a park, and is like, “A termite? A tiny morsel of dirt?” Like, coming up with all these things and, and the daughter’s just like, “Trees.” It just, I think demonstrates the extent to which this parent is so preoccupied with their own identity
[00:11:43] Malcolm Collins: and- Yeah, they can’t even see...
[00:11:44] Well, what a great metaphor. They can’t even see the trees in a park.
[00:11:48] Simone Collins: Yeah.
[00:11:48] Malcolm Collins: They can’t even see the trees around them. They, they can’t see the tree. It’s, it’s- The woods for, the
[00:11:52] Simone Collins: woods for the trees. Yes. Is that what you’re going for here?
[00:11:55] Malcolm Collins: Yes. Okay. Yeah. But they’re, to, to miss the world around them so [00:12:00] holistically-
[00:12:00] Simone Collins: Yeah
[00:12:01] Malcolm Collins: out of a focus on their own identity.
[00:12:03] Simone Collins: Yeah. And this, again, like I, I find it a relatable message. I think it’s, it’s sweet, but it’s also, I think, very telling, and it is, it is a bit of an affront to the original point of the holiday. By the way, Malcolm, thank you for your sacrifice. I was, we were so busy on Sunday that I, We’re gonna have to do a delayed Father’s Day, and I’m really sorry.
[00:12:23] Malcolm Collins: No,
[00:12:23] what?
[00:12:23] Simone Collins: You’re an amazing dad. You’re such an amazing dad. You, you sacrifice more than any other man I’ve ever encountered. You put yourself on the front lines of parenthood in a way that no father or husband I’ve ever met will. Like- Mm ... that you’re always the one that takes the kids to the doctor- I don’t know if that’s true.
[00:12:38] You’ve been doing a lot recently ... you’re alw- always the one the kids are with on the weekends. Though you’re always the one-
[00:12:43] Malcolm Collins: He’s started coding.
[00:12:44] Simone Collins: I, I, well, look, we need to, we need to get something to work there, and you’re doing a really great job. But you are amazing- Well, I mean, we are happy- ... and I appreciate you
[00:12:56] Malcolm Collins: I’ve built out all of the core features. Right now we’re just working on extra stuff, like a integrated email management feature, which- We’re very excited about ... hopefully save... I mean, w- if I can get email off of my daily to-do list, that would save me so much time.
[00:13:09] Simone Collins: Same. Yeah, especially, yeah, ‘cause w- now there’s more coming in than we can manage, but we still don’t wanna not read everyone’s message.
[00:13:16] So if we just make it slightly more efficient, and you’re making it crazy more efficient. Anyway, let’s go into the next article which is titled The Most Important Way that Fatherhood Has Changed. Mm. In this article, Frank Bruni, who is a childless contributing opinion writer who’s been on staff-
[00:13:33] Malcolm Collins: Why?
[00:13:34] Why did they let a childless writer write this?
[00:13:36] Simone Collins: Well, so I think he believes that he is in a position to talk about fatherhood because he’s talking about it from a removed perspective. In this article he talks about- Mm ... the difference between the way his father raised him and his brother, and the way- Mm.
[00:13:53] Mm ... and his brothers, and the way that his brothers have in turn raised their children. And he talks about how fathers are spending more time with their kids now. He cites an article that suggests one reason fertility is lower is that men want to give the kids they do have more attention- Lame ... which he frames as a good thing,
[00:14:12] Malcolm Collins: and- Don’t spend time with your kids.
[00:14:13] Walk up, hit ‘em, walk away. Oh, my God. That’s, whether they’ve done something bad or not. Yeah. Kids love being hit.
[00:14:18] Simone Collins: No, honestly, they, our, our kids really do. They really like fighting. They- And if you don’t do it, they’ll start it so that you do do it. Octavia- Watch out, ‘cause they hit hard ...
[00:14:26] Malcolm Collins: dropping on the floor to try to kick me in the nuts in the store.
[00:14:28] Simone Collins: What?
[00:14:30] Malcolm Collins: This is a real thing that just happened yesterday.
[00:14:35] Simone Collins: Yeah, all these other pliant children in their shopping carts. Octavian coming in for the kill. Classic. But yeah this again is, is I think that constant theme. This is why the progressive left is, is choosing to relinquish its position in the future.
[00:14:49] There is this choice to indulgently spend more time investing in children. But I think what’s really telling about his article is that the examples he cites on like, well, here’s this valuable additional investment that these children have vis-a-vis his 90-something-year-old father who is just a provider.
[00:15:09] These, these parents are getting emotionally involved in their kids’ lives, and they are... here’s one example. He wrote, “Mark,” and this is his brother, “Mark encouraged his children to let him in by inviting them- To understand him. He made sure that they met and mingled with his adult friends, and thus observed how he tended relationships and what they meant to him.
[00:15:30] He also showed his children his passions. “I took Frank to a Grateful Dead concert when he was 12,” Mark told me, referring to his oldest son, who like me, is named after my father. But that outing wasn’t just characteristically ardent Deadhead evangelism and, well, unorthodox parenting. It reflected Mark’s sustained effort to expand the time that he and his, and Frank spent together.
[00:15:51] The more hours, the more conversation, the more, the more conversation, the greater the likelihood of serendipitous revelations- Why see a dad going to a- ... real [00:16:00] familiarity, deeper connection. So basically, this father was like, “This is my passion. Witness me.” And you know, he made his son go and listen. And listen, I like Grateful Dead music.
[00:16:10] I thought I was a Deadhead when I was a kid, ‘cause my father too shared his Grateful Dead passion with me. But it wasn’t that aspect of my growing up with him that was actually helpful. What, what he’s missing here, what Frank Bruni is missing I think, is that investment in children is not all equal.
[00:16:24] The investment in children in their careers, in the way that like Benjamin Franklin’s father invested in him, walking him along the street, showing him different trades, asking him what stood out to him. The way that my dad, for example, invested in me. Taking me to work with him, helping me get jobs teaching me what business m- meetings look like, taking me to trade shows.
[00:16:40] Like, this, this is really valuable investment, and this is stuff that I think parents are really missing. You know, they’re, they’re treating children like pets. Like this thing where like, “Oh, you’re gonna see how I, you know, my friends, and I’m gonna raise you to be this indulgent, happy person, and we’re gonna be like emotionally so close.”
[00:16:59] And it’s true that younger generations now are closer like friends to their parents than ever before, but they’re also more mentally sick. And I don’t know- Yeah ... like there’s, there’s no proven causation. There is this- But it’s not great ...
[00:17:10] Malcolm Collins: optimization of closeness without thought for the long-term negative effects.
[00:17:15] That’s not great ... and there are going to be long-term negative effects for the way that they’re raising their kids like this. And worse, the way he’s spending money. Look, a father going to a concert? W- what? Paying for a ticket for your kid? That is not sustainable if you have a large family.
[00:17:32] Simone Collins: Yeah, and, and way to...
[00:17:33] Hopefully he had him wear earplugs. That’s a very easy path to early hearing loss, which is not, not great. But yeah, here’s... The next one made me so angry because we, you know, have personally tried so hard for there to be, to encourage the existence of and, and foster the growth of progressive or left-leaning at least pronatalists.
[00:17:59] And yet here is one, and- Scott Galloway ... the New York Times opinion is, yeah, Scott Galloway defenestrating him for holding a very practical and pragmatic view vis-à-vis paternity leave. So in this particular opinion piece, Jessica Grove or sorry, Grose, who is a, she is a mother, but she’s a woman of, of two children in Brooklyn.
[00:18:21] She denounces Scott Galloway’s stance on paternity leave. And again, see, Scott Galloway, he, he considers himself, I think, more like center-left or a social capitalist, but he’s still as far, as far as it can get when, when you’re left-leaning and pronatalist.
[00:18:38] Yeah.
[00:18:38] And in this interview with Derek Thompson-
[00:18:40] Galloway said, quote, “I think there should be mandatory maternity leave because I think the species needs to propagate. I’m not sure there should be mandatory paternity leave. I think it sometimes creates resentment. I think sometimes it’s abused. And so I’m a bit capitalist here. I think it’s between the company but I don’t know if I immediately default to, oh, the father needs to be there.”
[00:19:04] Grose added, this is the au- the author of the op-ed. Galloway also commented that he doesn’t think men should be in the delivery room. Quote, “I thought that it was so disgusting and unnatural,” he says. When I asked Galloway if he had a response to the backlash he’s been getting over these comments, he said over email, “My comments were intentionally provocative in the context of a friendly, snarky conversation with Derek.”
[00:19:28] Which It’s s- it, it’s like exactly the kind of thing that I think many fathers can relate to. And making these conversations open and transparent I think is crucial and important. Like, w- when people pretend that like the birthing experience is beautiful, especially for men-
[00:19:47] Malcolm Collins: Ugh. I don’t- That, that- I do not go.
[00:19:49] My wife doesn’t have me come to the delivery room. Like, I mean, you-
[00:19:51] Simone Collins: Well, yeah, and there was the one time where you were in, in with me with the C-section, and you were like, look. Like you were so uncomfortable. And, and trying to force this on men, or even [00:20:00] worse, to sell them this fantasy of like you’re gonna love being a baby daddy, like a, a, a, a, a father of an infant.
[00:20:06] You’re gonna love being in the delivery room. Will then set men up to think, “Oh, gosh, like I, I actually don’t like this, so this means I’m not gonna like to be a father at all.” Yeah,
[00:20:16] Malcolm Collins: I’m not gonna like all the other stuff.
[00:20:18] Simone Collins: And actually in, in his, in his talk, Galloway makes it clear that it gets better.
[00:20:25] So I’ll keep going. Sh- so she also noted in her op-ed I’m reading from it now, “Poor Derek Thompson tried to push back and launch a defense of parental leave. Most of the gap between prime age adult male and female earnings is a motherhood penalty, and so one benefit of paternity leave is that it puts men and women on a relatively more equal standing.”
[00:20:46] To which Galloway replies, “By lowering the economic standards of a man?” Which is a super like valid retort.
[00:20:53] Malcolm Collins: Reasonable point, yes.
[00:20:54] Simone Collins: Yeah. She proceeded, however, to cite research finding that paid paternity leave in Quebec did not fix the motherhood penalty for women, nor did it substantially hurt men’s economic standards.
[00:21:06] So good for you. But then she also attempts to exploit that not a baby man, which I talk about like there’s like 10% of men who are like they love babies. They just, infants, like they, they, they wanna hold them, et cetera, but like most men aren’t. But she tries to exploit his, Scott Galloway’s not, disinterest in babies with this.
[00:21:27] She wrote, “It gets worse. Thompson, who is still glowing from the birth of his second child, shares a very sweet story and, and how he feels an enormous upsurge of instinct how to parent my child. Thompson adds, ‘I love discovering a new piece of myself in parenting.’ Galloway doesn’t even seem to be listening to Thompson because his response is- The bad news is it just sucks for the dad.
[00:21:49] We pretend to like it. Galloway thinks dads are full of it when they say they like babies. They’re awful. As a new dad, your job is to make sure your moms don’t lose it, and get some sleep, and keep the baby away from bodies of water. That’s literally your only two jobs right now, or if the only two things that you’re any good at.
[00:22:08] At about two or three it starts to get less awful, and then by four or five it almost becomes fun. That’s what Scott Galloway said, and she’s quoting him in her article. And I think you would, like, you have said almost the same thing, and other very pro-natalist and kid-loving fathers that we know and trust and love, who are very culturally different from us as well, have said the same thing, that they’re just not into kids before they turn, like, five basically.
[00:22:31] And then, like-
[00:22:31] Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and then they get awesome.
[00:22:33] Simone Collins: Yeah. And so that this woman is shaming Scott Galloway for expressing an extremely pervasive view held by fathers, and making Galloway seem like kind of a monster for doing so is It’s both, like, unfair and un- and, and, and f- and fairly cruel, but also I would argue pretty anti-natalist.
[00:22:55] Because again, if you make men think- Yeah ... like, “Oh, this is not normal, this is bad, this must mean that I’ll ne- not like anything about being a father,” they might decide to get a vasectomy. They might decide to just give up on that and have just one kid. Well, the
[00:23:08] Malcolm Collins: thing that really hit me recently is the day when I decided to go with you because you’re doing your next implantation, which we’ve done recently, so hopefully you’re pregnant.
[00:23:15] Everyone be praying. Fingers
[00:23:16] Simone Collins: crossed ...
[00:23:17] Malcolm Collins: and getting in the car and driving out, and I realized at no point did it occur to me to not do this. At no point- Hmm ... did I sit down and think, “Do I really want another kid? Can we really afford another kid? Does this make sense for our family?” It was just a regular yearly activity happening when it happened.
[00:23:37] And it reminded me, in the same way when we read that piece about the early stage abortion and the I Met My Husband at a Gang Bang episode. Watch that episode if you want to. It’s traumatizing. But, Mm ... that was when the radicalized Simone against early stage abortion. If y- if you haven’t seen it, watch.
[00:23:53] It’s w- I think one of our craziest episodes. It’ll start with you being all mad if you’re a conservative, and then you’re like, “Wait, this is c- what? [00:24:00] What?” But- Mm. Mm. Mm ... when she went to have an abortion, there was no moment leading up to the abortion that she really considered keeping the baby. It was-
[00:24:11] Simone Collins: Yeah, there was...
[00:24:12] It was unthinkable. Of course. Just like it’s unthinkable for us not to try for kid six, yeah.
[00:24:17] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And I realized that that’s the way it needs to be. Like, not having kids needs to be completely unthinkable in a marriage. That is how you make this work for you, for your kids, for the way you make this work.
[00:24:29] In the same way that... And, and when do we start? In fact, let’s just lay this out. When do you start with intechno-puritanism? At the maximum, whether or not you’re financially stable, two years after you’re married.
[00:24:43] Simone Collins: Yeah, that makes sense. Oi. Yeah.
[00:24:46] Malcolm Collins: And if you, and if you, and if you can start before that, better
[00:24:50] Simone Collins: Yeah, the sooner, the sooner the better, for sure.
[00:24:53] Yeah. It just, so that’s super unfair. She, she also imposes another unfair implication on Scott Galloway. She says, “Scott Galloway is entitled to his feelings about parenting babies. I’m sure he’s not alone.” Oh, you’re sure. “But what I’m objecting to is the unsaid implication that it’s super fun for moms all the time, while also talking to a man who seems to be wholeheartedly enjoying his small children.”
[00:25:21] First, he’s not implying that it’s fun for moms all the time. What he’s implying when he’s like, “Oh, you can only do two things: try to get some sleep and, like, make sure the baby’s not close to bodies of water,” is that, like, mothers are dependent or, like, the ones who have the, the breast milk. Like, you can’t really substitute that.
[00:25:37] I mean, I, you, you can obviously do formula or you can feed bottles of breast milk, but if, if a woman is lactating, like, you can’t lactate for her. You can’t really do that. And women who are newly postpartum have also gone through a bunch of hormonal shifts, which I would argue make them more tolerant of sleep deprivation, make them more capable of not being super stressed about taking care of a screaming infant in the middle of the night or something like that than a father was.
[00:26:03] I mean, things do change when you become a father, but not in the same way they do for someone who’s been pregnant for nine months. So I just think it’s not, it’s not even fair. And then she frames his statement, As elitist. When he tries to defend himself when given a chance to comment on this article she, she wrote, “When I asked Galloway if he was familiar with any of his research, she said, ‘My point wasn’t that...’
[00:26:26] Or sorry, he said, Galloway said, ‘My point wasn’t that maternity leave is bad. It’s that we should be honest about trade-offs and let families make decisions based on their circumstances rather than treating one model as morally superior.’” Which she’s clearly doing. She’s like, “Well- Yeah ... maternity leave is, is categorically better.
[00:26:43] There’s no, there’s no ambiguity. The studies say-”
[00:26:46] Malcolm Collins: Nuance.
[00:26:47] Simone Collins: Yeah. There’s, there’s no nuance there. But, but he is, he is elitist because she’s like, “Well, not everyone has that choice.” And she, she finishes with, “I don’t think it’s unusual for men. to find childbirth uncomfortable or scary , to watch, and becoming a dad is a rough transition for many.
[00:27:10] There’s a whole genre of internet videos of dads passing out in the delivery room.” Which I now need to explore. But-
[00:27:16] Malcolm Collins: Wait, really?
[00:27:17] Simone Collins: I, yeah, I need, I need to check this out. “I don’t think that saying that watching women give birth is, quote, ‘disgusting and unnatural,’ end quote, is the best way to start this conversation.
[00:27:27] Galloway told me in an email, ‘The broader point I was making, clumsily, is that we should be honest about the different experiences people have rather than the perspectives about what every father must feel or do. Some dads experience profound bonding in the first few weeks. Others find their stride later.
[00:27:43] Both are valid.’” And she says- Good talk, Galloway ... he wholeheartedly agrees with that statement, but only after an article criticizing him for it. And Galloway’s making such an important point that, you know, you’re not, not all dads feel this, like, love at first sight thing with their kids. Yeah. Like y- you really don’t.
[00:27:59] You’re [00:28:00] like, “I need a paternity test. I don’t know about this.” Like, and that’s natural. You are the most loving dad I’ve ever met. You adore our children. Like sometimes when I am like, “I, I, I need a moment,” you, you really don’t. Y- you’re just always there for them. Yeah,
[00:28:14] Malcolm Collins: I’m never like, “I need a moment.”
[00:28:15] I’m always available for the kids.
[00:28:17] Simone Collins: Yeah. L- and then that’s- But you’re still, you’re not a baby man. And it’s, so, so that’s the thing, is like she’s communicating this, this, this really bad lie. So anyway, this is, yeah, facet number three is the one leftist pronatalist who has a really big profile gets defenestrated
[00:28:37] Malcolm Collins: for- Defenestrated by The New York Times
[00:28:38] Simone Collins: sharing realistic policy positions and trying to make men who don’t love babies not feel like they’re just gonna be bad fathers and not suited to be parents at all. Okay? Great. Thanks, New York Times. So now we get to the new right’s very old vision of men. This is an episode of the Ezra Klein Show with Helen Lewis.
[00:28:56] They discuss this concept she wrote about and refers to as masculinism. So they, they open with clips of Bronze Age Pervert and Tucker Carlson, who are yearning for the ancient Hittite Empire, or ancient Mittani Empire, or what we had before Betty Friedan wrote The Feminine Mystique and before-
[00:29:15] Malcolm Collins: But we need to talk about this, ‘cause this is just not...
[00:29:17] But question, Simone, question.
[00:29:19] Simone Collins: Yeah, yeah.
[00:29:20] Malcolm Collins: Total side note. Should I get Octavian another Game Boy emulator?
[00:29:24] Simone Collins: Well, he was really jealous of Tex’s chew toy that looks like a Game Boy,
[00:29:29] Malcolm Collins: so. It’s $59. I, they, the-
[00:29:31] Simone Collins: Oh, you’re just browsing Prime Day ... the one I’m thinking
[00:29:35] Malcolm Collins: about. I was-
[00:29:35] Simone Collins: I was wondering why a white light reflected in those glasses of yours
[00:29:39] Malcolm Collins: I know. Hold, you gotta listen to me. This is actually important. So it, it turns out that it, the, the model that’s the best and the most robust, because I, that’s what specifically what I’m looking for, is not discounted for Prime Day, which doesn’t cost that much. And-
[00:29:53] Simone Collins: Oh, because we have time.
[00:29:54] Malcolm Collins: No, we-
[00:29:55] Simone Collins: Look, he broke it.
[00:29:55] They break everything. I, I don’t think we need to teach him- Well,
[00:29:59] Malcolm Collins: that’s why I’m trying to get something more robust ...
[00:30:01] Simone Collins: when we break something you just get a new one.
[00:30:03] Malcolm Collins: He broke it over a year ago at this point. Come on.
[00:30:08] Simone Collins: See, you’re more forgiving than I am. Oh, sir.
[00:30:10] Malcolm Collins: So we’ll let the audience decide.
[00:30:12] Simone Collins: Yeah.
[00:30:12] Does our kid- The audience will decide. Yeah, yes or no to the... Please no, Tex. Oh my God. So, right. So basically they open with these, you know, right, right-leaning influencers, although Tucker Carlson, I think just to be clear, he’s not a Republican about, like, yearning for the, the earlier days. What they argue essentially in this episode trying to basically encapsulate and then comment on the broader, like, masculinity sphere, is that there is this coherent masculinist ideology on the American light, right, sorry, the American right, that goes way beyond just, like, manosphere provocateurs like Andrew Tate.
[00:30:52] That the central claim of masculinism is that modernity is, is broken, especially for men. It is, it is thwarted masculinity. There’s dropping testosterone. There’s dropping fertility. Men are ill-suited for this kind of society, and they, Think that true masculinity centers around hierarchy and dominance and risk-taking and clear gender roles with male breadwinners- Well, this,
[00:31:18] Malcolm Collins: this is all true
[00:31:20] Simone Collins: and then they, they point to figures like Raw Egg Nationalist, who we consider to be a friend and really like. Bronze Age Pervert, Helen Andrews, who wrote the Foundation
[00:31:29] Malcolm Collins: for- Oh,
[00:31:29] Simone Collins: by the way, we’ve had Raw Egg
[00:31:30] Malcolm Collins: Nationalist on the show. If anyone has a contact to Milo or Bronze Age Pervert, I’d love to have both of them on the show.
[00:31:35] Simone Collins: Truly. They include JD Vance in all this, Doug Wilson parts of Heritage’s agenda. And we love Heritage Foundation, so, like, we take this all very personally. They talk about various concerns expressed with mac- masculinism. I think their, their primary criticism, and it is abundant. They s- I- they, they spend a lot of time.
[00:31:55] This is, like, all that was playing in my office all afternoon. They don’t like... [00:32:00] They think it has incoherent intellectualism. Klein keeps finding that there’s less here than I thought be- beneath this, for his, for his stance, grand talk of thumos and Nietzsche and liberal decadence, and the arguments often collapse, per his argument, into trivial lifestyle advice like, “Throw out your plastic chopping board,” or conspiratorial hormone politics.
[00:32:26] Or as Bronze Age Pervert would write, “w***e-mones.” They- W***e-mones. W***e-mones. Yes, he knows
[00:32:32] what’s up.
[00:32:33] He knows what’s up. They argue that a lot of the literature swaps serious argument for just trolling or irony and vibes. Meaning that it’s, it’s- No,
[00:32:41] Malcolm Collins: they miss it. They don’t understand what’s happening.
[00:32:44] Simone Collins: Yeah, they, they don’t, they don’t yeah, they, they just sort of completely misread it. Like, they don’t understand the trolling. They don’t understand the aesthetics.
[00:32:53] Malcolm Collins: If you watch our show, you will note that a lot of our show is trolling feeling. Yeah. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a lot of substance to it.
[00:33:02] There is
[00:33:03] Simone Collins: substance. There is research. There is-
[00:33:08] The trolling is authenticating. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, the, yeah, the trolling is a, a sign of authenticity and a way to socially signal what we’ve called, I think, what, performative vice to say, like, we are gen- like, that we’re doing the opposite of vir- virtue signaling. Like, signaling vice to the extent that it will hurt our reputation just to show you that we have no desire to be seen as good or smart for example.
[00:33:30] Of course, they also highlight the movement’s misogyny. They, and this is actually the argument that F- Misogyny? Come on ... that we’ve also made. Yeah.
[00:33:38] Malcolm Collins: Dude, literally. The reason, like, we have no misogynistic opinion The only reason we don’t want women to vote is because they keep voting for the wrong candidate. I, I’m joking of course. The real reason why it’s bad for women to vote is because if voting is a proxy for force, so basically the reason you vote is, like, if you went to war, who would actually win of the two perspectives?
[00:34:05] And women wouldn’t be included in that fighting force. Then eventually you create an asymmetry where it may make sense for a faction of the population to just capture power via war. So suppose, as is increasingly happening, all of the women are sorting into one population bloc- voting bloc, and all the men are voting for another candidate, and then the male candidate loses, and then the men just say, “Well, f**k it.
[00:34:26] I don’t care anymore.” And this is why democracy prevents that, but it doesn’t prevent it when you allow women to vote.
[00:34:32] Simone Collins: Right. And, but they, they... In- instead of hearing this, like, let’s talk about the misaligned incentives and how this is all playing out, what they just see and what they talk about in their podcast is like, this...
[00:34:44] They, they’re just anti-democracy and they’re just pro-violence. And they don’t really go deeper than that because they just... I, maybe they lack the capacity to read this more closely. Like, you really have to be looking at the problems in a very critical way. Well, they still acknowledge the problems.
[00:34:58] Like, they acknowledge that boys are, are completely, you know, maladapted for the schools the way they’re set up now. They, they acknowledge that there’s a health crisis and there’s too much sedentary life and everything. So they, they say that these are very real issues, but then they criticize the movement for Using it to exploit young men, for example with this sort of, like, self-helpishness that isn’t actually self-help.
[00:35:22] It, the long story short, ‘cause I could go into so much more detail, is that this, this is a podcast that has huge, huge viewership, that’s, that is made by very thoughtful people, Ezra Klein is, is very thoughtful and I think very well-meaning. But it’s still trying to frame this movement that is questioning modern norms in a way that isn’t intended to damage its credibility and stifle conversation about those genuine problems which they even acknowledge to be real.
[00:35:53] Which I think is very annoying and grating. But also because they’re not dedicated to actually solving these problems in a [00:36:00] way that could lead to inconvenient truths surfacing. Again, they’re representative of a group that is not likely to inherit the future. Yeah. So there’s these different facets of the way that The New York Times is trying to cover masculinity.
[00:36:13] They’re trying to cover it by defenestrating the one leftist pronatalist and, and practical parental leave policies. They’re trying to... I’m so sorry about Tex. Tex, friend. You, like, you’re not distressed, you just, you just wanna troll me and maybe you’re tired. They’re trying to under- undermine masculinity by having a, a woman write about Father’s Day and a trans man write about Father’s Day.
[00:36:41] And they’re, they’re trying to undermine masculinity by having a, yeah, like the person on X pointed out, a childless man decide what good parenting is and, and proclaim it in The New York Times opinion section. It’s, it’s weird. I don’t know if, like, there’s been some concerted effort to talk about masculinity and to be like, “This
[00:37:04] Malcolm Collins: is-” I almost wonder if it’s, like, a reaction to the pushback from the first piece.
[00:37:08] Like, we’re just gonna go extra hard on this now that we’ve gotten pushback or...
[00:37:13] Simone Collins: What, what do you think? No, because I mean, I, I think these things required some research and scheduling and prep to put together. I don’t know if it’s just this, like, immune system, like it, like, it could be, and I, I’ve been thinking about it as some kind of collective immune system response, right?
[00:37:27] That the, the white blood cells have recognized the, the virus that is this, this new movement broadly of, of fighting back against urban monoculture masculinity, and the immune system is now attempting to kill the virus by saying, “No, this is what fatherhood is. This is what masculinity is. This is what correct
[00:37:49] Malcolm Collins: parenting is.”
[00:37:50] Well, masculinity doesn’t involve men. I mean, that seems to be the point of this, right? They- Yeah.
[00:37:55] Simone Collins: It doesn’t involve men and it doesn’t involve fathers and it doesn’t involve genuinely trying to Question the broken systems at play that are harmful toward both men and women. It’s very frustrating, but there you go.
[00:38:13] It’s wild. I still really enjoyed the sick burns from the kid, ‘cause I love sick burns from the kid.
[00:38:17] Malcolm Collins: Legit, just burning the train. Yeah, but like, I mean, we see where this is going. Like, it’s very concerning. It’s very concerning to me that, like, we can’t have an honest conversation around the things that don’t seem to be working as a society, and are just supposed to go along with it.
[00:38:38] Just supposed to be like, “Oh, yeah, this, this is all fine. This is all working. We, we can look at the outcomes and see how f*****g terrible they are.” But nope. We’ll just go along with it
[00:38:49] Simone Collins: Yeah, I don’t know what to say aside from I can see why people on X were so mad. Now I understand. But also, maybe we’re gonna have to reach a point where maybe, guys, we don’t need to read The New York Times.
[00:39:02] I don’t, I don’t know.
[00:39:04] Malcolm Collins: I mean, The New York Times readership is basically a contraceptive at this point, right? Like, if you re- I used to love The New York Times. It was one of my favorite newspapers. But, We all,
[00:39:12] Simone Collins: well, we did it all, I guess,
[00:39:13] Malcolm Collins: but- That future is over, right? Like, that world is over. The world of The New York Times is not the world of the future of humans, right?
[00:39:22] We are the future of humanity. We, as hard as they fight back against this, I was telling Simone today that Nux got demonetized across YouTube, across all his channels.
[00:39:32] Simone Collins: I’m so mad.
[00:39:32] Malcolm Collins: And they said harassment. I watch Nux’s channel. He doesn’t harass anyone as far as I’ve seen. He, he very rarely makes specific call-outs except for Hasan.
[00:39:41] I guess if it’s harassment against Hasan, okay. That, the- Touché ... the delicate little flower needed protection from Nux. But Hasan regularly- Oh ... harasses other people, right? Like, so I mean, that’s scary. That’s scary to be on a platform that can just do that when you’re following all of their rules [00:40:00]
[00:40:00] Simone Collins: I hope he gets monetized again.
[00:40:03] This, this reminds me actually of what happened to Leaflet when you included a clip of our kids being, our kids being the, you know, insane reavers they are and you being like, “You b******s,” Yeah, you little b******s is what they said. And, and I think they, I think they referred to that as hate speech.
[00:40:20] Malcolm Collins: No, they said I was, like, a- attacking children or something.
[00:40:23] Simone Collins: Yeah, wasn’t it bullying? Calling them little b******s. I think it was, I think it was exactly the same moderation reason, though-
[00:40:27] Malcolm Collins: Mm ...
[00:40:28] Simone Collins: as what Leaflet saw when hers was demonetized. So.
[00:40:32] Malcolm Collins: I mean, I don’t, when you say it, but it’s the standard trans approach, you know?
[00:40:36] And the fun thing is, is like I’d actually be okay if somebody figured out a way to make transness demographically stable, right? Like, if you’re a trans person and you’re watching this and you’re like, well, like let’s, let’s... Can I make it demographically stable? Fine, like go for it. That’d be great.
[00:40:51] Simone Collins: In the Culture Series it is.
[00:40:52] So in Ian Banks’ Culture Series I think a lot of humans, because the, the body’s modified so much that if you want to grow a uterus, you, like over a series of months can just grow that organ and then shift your hormone, because you have a, you have a drug gland. Every, every Culture citizen has the option to install a drug gland which can at any point, like release a variety of different mind-altering compounds.
[00:41:15] Like, you can just instantly get drunk when you want to get st- a stimulant when you need it. Like, it has, it’s just an, an endogenous drug producing gland. That means you can also endogenously for the most part I think, produce everything you need to in order to transition your gender. And there are characters that are featured in the Culture Series who at points in their lives like decided to become a man for like a couple years, and become a woman for a couple years.
[00:41:39] And that’s a version of transness where like y- you genuinely could with this drug gland grow a uterus, have a baby Get rid of the uterus, turn into a man again. It, and I, I wouldn’t, like, it’s, it’s theoretically possible. You could possibly, plausibly have some kind of, like, with really, really advanced technology, you could have this, right?
[00:42:09] Malcolm Collins: Theoretically, yes.
[00:42:10] Simone Collins: Theoretically. So okay, that, that is my version. My version of an, an ideal future is basically just the, the culture though. I’m, I’m obsessed. What is tech- Yeah, like I
[00:42:19] Malcolm Collins: don’t- What is this mood? As society changes, my views on this would change. As technology changes, my views on this would change.
[00:42:26] But right now the wider culture around the trans phenomenon is so toxic and so damaging, I just have to take the stance that if only to distance yourself from that wider culture, it’s better not to transition, right? Like, no- no matter how much you feel that you would benefit from it, because the culture will attempt to...
[00:42:50] Like, if you transition and then you have an opinion that’s not an approved opinion, or even the average opinion of the community shifts and now your previously approved opinion falls in the unapproved category, you get thrown in the gutter, no matter how much you’ve done for the community. I mean, look at how the community treats Caitlyn Jenner.
[00:43:08] Look at how the community treats Buck Angel, the, the two real, like, out in front advocates for it, right? Like, there, there is no respite in the community. Look at how the community treats Ana Valens. Did you know that Ana Valens ended up being canceled by leftists? This, this was this year.
[00:43:24] Simone Collins: Oh, gosh.
[00:43:24] Malcolm Collins: For, can you guess what? Can you guess why she was canceled?
[00:43:29] Simone Collins: Well, I, I’m sure it had something to do with her general oversharing, but I can’t quite tell what.
[00:43:32] Malcolm Collins: No, no, no, no. What would be literally the craziest clown worldest reason for her to be canceled?
[00:43:38] Simone Collins: Her giantess interest?
[00:43:40] Malcolm Collins: No, no, no. Literally the craziest.
[00:43:42] Simone Collins: Ah.
[00:43:44] Malcolm Collins: Being a Kirsha fan.
[00:43:48] Simone Collins: Aw.
[00:43:49] Malcolm Collins: She’s not a Kirsha fan, by the way. She tried to destroy Kirsha’s life, but the left doesn’t care about what’s true. She did an article about why Pippa wasn’t so bad [00:44:00] compared to Kirsha, and somehow people got confused and thought she was a Kirsha fan, and Blue Sky just ran with that
[00:44:11] Simone Collins: Blue Sky seems like the most toxic but too boring to find amusing place in the entire internet Is there a moment where, like, you wake up
[00:44:20] Malcolm Collins: and you’re like, “Wait, did I choose the wrong team? Did, did I choose the everybody stab everybody in the back team?”
[00:44:28] Simone Collins: Mm. I don’t know, man. It’s very frustrating.
[00:44:34] Malcolm Collins: But look- I like that you brought these to my att- oh, now he’s asleep?
[00:44:37] Simone Collins: You see... Yeah. He just, he just, he needs to, like, scream and scream. This is what I say when he, like, has to yell himself to sleep and then
[00:44:46] Malcolm Collins: he’s out. And
[00:44:46] Simone Collins: you’re like, “Oh.” Right when I need to get up and make dinner.
[00:44:50] Malcolm Collins: Right when you need to get up and make dinner. Well, I’m sure you’ll be able to make dinner even more obediently-
[00:44:56] because of this, Simone. Which is really what all of us care about here, right?
[00:45:01] Simone Collins: Right? I need to know my place, because we are... Oh, God. Let me look at my notes. What did Helen Lewis call them? I love Helen Lewis. This is the problem. I find her very funny and fun. She calls it masculinism. Yes, because we are masculinists, and so my job is in the kitchen making- Well,
[00:45:21] Malcolm Collins: as, as a masculinist, I’m gonna get our kid another game console, ‘cause he deserves one- Oh.
[00:45:26] for being a sweetie. What?
[00:45:29] Simone Collins: He is a sweetie. How can we, how can we deny him? Plus, he is our son. Our sons must have everything.
[00:45:36] Malcolm Collins: Yes. Not our daughters. I’m not getting one for our daughters.
[00:45:39] Simone Collins: She’s a shark princess. She will take it from you.
[00:45:41] Malcolm Collins: She has made that very clear in recent episodes. I had a... One of the ends of a recent episode where she was talking about how she will only eat some color fishes.
[00:45:52] Not her favorite color, but, like- Oh, yeah ... gray fishes. And then she makes an eating, a, a show of how she’s gonna eat them. And then she’ll eat divers like me. She explicitly points at me. Like, not regular people. She’s like, “No, you.”
[00:46:09] Simone Collins: It’s terrible ‘cause it’s rubbing off on, on her little sister Indy, and now Indy’s just all about being defiant when she used to be my little, my little turkey.
[00:46:18] Doing- She’d be my little helper. She would bus her table. She’s still obsessed with cleaning, though. I, I, I need to- ... pretend that that’s subversive.
[00:46:26] My spray bottle.
[00:46:27] My spray bottle.
[00:46:29] My sp- Wait, Indy fights back now?
[00:46:32] Why? I wanna cleaning. Because I think she sees all her siblings do it, and she wants to be like her big n- big brothers and sister.
[00:46:40] Malcolm Collins: That’s really sweet. I wanna cleaning. You did a good job making these little monsters.
[00:46:45] Simone Collins: Yeah, well, she used to clean, and now she just uses her spray bottle to attack people, so.
[00:46:51] Malcolm Collins: And I demand praise for the expensive microphone, guys. I got a...
[00:46:55] Simone Collins: Yeah. Now you’ve listened to Tex screaming in your ear. How do you feel now?
[00:47:01] Do you want me to go back to the old one? Do, do you, do you, did I do the right thing? Are you happy now? Are you hap- are you happy now?
[00:47:11] Malcolm Collins: Oh my God, you are so... Look, I’m gonna be, I’m gonna be good about this. I’m even or- ordering it slow so we get the 7% back.
[00:47:20] Simone Collins: Thank you, actually. I always do that. I did that for these ‘cause they cost the, as much as our house.
[00:47:30] Malcolm Collins: What, what- So we- What cost-
[00:47:31] Simone Collins: I, I... Oh, no, I didn’t do it with these. I didn’t do it with the microphones.
[00:47:35] Aw. No,
[00:47:38] Malcolm Collins: but we needed these quickly.
[00:47:39] Simone Collins: Yeah, we did. For you g- for you guys. For you a******s.
[00:47:46] Okay.
[00:47:47] Malcolm Collins: We gotta get more swords while they’re on sale. Swords, flamethrowers- All
[00:47:51] Simone Collins: right, I need to- ... nails, chases ... Frank, I need to end. I’m sorry, Tex. All right. Before he starts screaming, we’re gonna, we’re gonna hit end here. Love you guys. All right, love you. [00:48:00] Bye. I love you, Malcolm.
[00:48:01] Malcolm Collins: Love you too.
[00:48:02] Simone Collins: You’re my special sub pony
[00:48:06] Malcolm Collins: Oh, but I think Texas.
[00:48:07] Look at that, he’s getting all the love, not me.
[00:48:09] Simone Collins: You’re, you’re, he’s a, he’s shards of your soul, Malcolm. He’s here, and he’s made of you.
[00:48:17] Yeah. Okay,
[00:48:18] Malcolm Collins: bye. But you guys need to become dads too. So find a wife, work really hard.
[00:48:22] Simone Collins: Yeah, become a dad. Don’t, don’t expect to love labor and delivery. And don’t expect to love babies. But if you
[00:48:28] Malcolm Collins: do, that’s great. And if you’re a woman watching this, go to the freaking Discord. There’s some guy there who will wife you up.
[00:48:34] Simone Collins: There’s some great guys in the Discord who are very
[00:48:36] Malcolm Collins: interesting. Or better, among our paid users. That’s, that’s where you know you get the big spenders, right? The real professionals.
[00:48:41] Simone Collins: Yes. No, true, true. That’s how you know they are financially secure.
[00:48:45] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Oh, yeah, we should I... Yeah, actually, if you wanna, if you’re a woman looking we, we should, like, be able to email all the paid subscribers women who are looking for husbands.
[00:48:53] I don’t
[00:48:53] Simone Collins: know. Should we do... Locked and Reported does, like, o- once a year, some kind of singles thing.
[00:49:01] Malcolm Collins: No, I think because we’re majority male just female only if you’re looking for a husband. Mm-hmm.
[00:49:06] Simone Collins: Oh, we should have just, like, some kind of directory of profiles.
[00:49:10] Malcolm Collins: No. We, we should just do an email blast for paid subscribers.
[00:49:14] Simone Collins: Okay, fine.
[00:49:14] Malcolm Collins: You have all their emails. I’m sure most of them would appreciate even just knowing, like, even if they’re not, even if they’re married or whatever, they’d appreciate that we’re trying to get somebody married. And it’s another reason to subscribe.
[00:49:27] Simone Collins: Oh, yeah. I’ll find a way. I’ll find a way to do this in a thoughtful way.
[00:49:32] We’ll take advice. Okay, bye guys. Bye, bye, bye, bye, bye.
[00:49:35] Bye. Bye.
[00:49:35] Simone Collins: Tex ate like half a sleeve of Ritz crackers today. That, that’s a slight overstatement I can hear you But only slight He
[00:49:41] Malcolm Collins: ate half a sleeve of Ritz
[00:49:42] Simone Collins: crackers? He’s obsessed. He’s obsessed. He’s a man. He’s putting on the Ritz. It’s his- Putting
[00:49:48] Malcolm Collins: on the Ritz? Yeah.
[00:49:49] Simone Collins: Yeah.
[00:49:50] Malcolm Collins: And look, look, look, I got a Technofuriten knife, the first one.
[00:49:56] Was able to get this on Amazon Day for 15 bucks, so it’s a good price for a- Prime
[00:50:00] Simone Collins: Day, yeah ...
[00:50:01] Malcolm Collins: stabby knife. Stabby. Significantly because it’s a, a bowie knife- It’s more slicey
[00:50:05] Simone Collins: than stabby ...
[00:50:06] Malcolm Collins: it’s significantly better than the, the ones that the Sikhs have, Oh, that’s wonderful, Tom ... in, in terms of a knife fight.
[00:50:13] Great. Well, I mean, their knives were invented a long time before, it’s that they’re just not as sophisticated.
[00:50:18] Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s interesting. Yeah, I feel like the LDS church would, if they had knives, update them with time. Maybe the Sikhs just haven’t had enough time, and then they’ll update The, it’s called the cure pen, right?
[00:50:28] I’ll update
[00:50:29] Malcolm Collins: it with pen. Yeah. Well, I mean, the, the Bowie knife is really the knife of the American frontier.
[00:50:32] Simone Collins: Yeah.
[00:50:32] Malcolm Collins: And so it is a traditional- ... American knife. It’s called the Amer- the, the Excalibur of the Americas, so. The
[00:50:39] Simone Collins: Exca- That is amazing. I’ve not heard that.
[00:50:41] Malcolm Collins: But I’ve already used it, like, multiple times.
[00:50:43] I didn’t know how useful it would be to just have a knife on me at all times.
[00:50:46] Simone Collins: My favorite part, though, was when you were trying to tell me the amazing history of the Bowie knife and the guy who invented it. You kept confusing his name. Because we, both you and I are terrible at names, but you kept calling him David Bowie
[00:50:57] Malcolm Collins: David
[00:50:57] Simone Collins: Bowie. I’m just blinded by that. Because every time I hear the name David Bowie, I, I get that one clip from Zoolander where it’s, “David Bowie,” and Let’s Dance flashes on real fast. It’s it’s great. It’s great. So now every time I see your knife, just so you know- And for dinner tonight- ... that clip from Zoolander plays in my head
[00:51:15] Malcolm Collins: Any sort of a curry with french fries would be good, or,
[00:51:18] Simone Collins: Okay ... any- Do you want sweet potato again, or you want, you want me to mix it up? You have a fry wardrobe now, basically, so is that what you, I
[00:51:25] Malcolm Collins: mean, the sweet potatoes were fantastic. I would love to go for something
[00:51:28] Simone Collins: else. A new curry and sweet potato?
[00:51:30] Malcolm Collins: Okay. Yeah, the sweet potatoes works. Yeah. I mean, the, the-
[00:51:33] Simone Collins: Or, or we have d- again, we have different fries. If you want different fries, we can try a different- Well,
[00:51:37] Malcolm Collins: which ones do we have?
[00:51:38] Simone Collins: Just- I don’t, I... The freezer’s not in front of me, but i- I think it’s a new one. It’s maybe one you got at Walmart that’s, like, a seasoned fry.
[00:51:45] Malcolm Collins: Oh, I wanna try the seasoned fries. Let’s try those.
[00:51:48] Simone Collins: Oh, boy. Tex, we got a new mic. You’re trying it out. Say
[00:51:52] Malcolm Collins: your piece. Yes. Guys, we finally got those super expensive, like, $300 mics that everyone’s been telling us to get, the Shure Sevenss. [00:52:00] So, Yeah ... they better sound better, because they were very expensive, okay?
[00:52:03] They were very
[00:52:04] Simone Collins: expensive. But what have you guys done? We even got them on discount, and we were like, “I’m never going to financially recover from this.” So what have you done? What have you done?
[00:52:11] Malcolm Collins: What have you done? But you, you guys wanted better audio, and now you’re gonna get-
[00:52:15] Simone Collins: Yeah, now you’re gonna hear Tex screaming and drooling into your ear in-
[00:52:20] Malcolm Collins: Well, that’s what you-
[00:52:21] this audio vision, like, equivalent ... that’s what you get throughout the day, Simone. Come on.
[00:52:24] Simone Collins: Oh, yeah. I guess that’s, I’m so sorry to all of you. I might put... I’m gonna, I’m gonna see if he can chill in his Snappi later while we’re out. Do
[00:52:31] Malcolm Collins: I sound any different to you on here, Simone? No. But, you know, we don’t- I don’t hear it.
[00:52:36] I don’t hear the difference between audio quality. Like, everyone else is like, “Audio this, audio this.” To me, we sound no different from Asma Gold. We sound no different from Nuggs. So that, that’s part of the problem- Oh, boy ... with, like, the audiophile is- He’s so upset ... I can’t hear the difference between Ah.
[00:52:52] Simone Collins: He’s not happy Okay, am I gonna get him milk before we start?
[00:52:58] Malcolm Collins: We’re g- we’re gonna start. Yes.
[00:53:00] Simone Collins: He’s an angry elf. I’m, I’m not, you know, I can’t think when there’s a baby crying, so I will be-
[00:53:04] Malcolm Collins: You will get him milk?
[00:53:06] Speaker: deep into the jungle, guys?
[00:53:11] Is this a jungle or woods?
[00:53:21] And that’s called a temperate rainforest, guys
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this raw and data-driven episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins tackle one of the most uncomfortable topics in modern discourse: what happens when cousin marriage is practiced across multiple generations?
While a single first-cousin marriage carries moderate risk, repeated generational consanguinity causes the inbreeding coefficient (F) to compound nonlinearly. After just 4–6 generations, offspring become as genetically similar as full siblings. The hosts walk through the math, real-world population data, IQ impacts (10–30+ point drops), elevated rates of genetic disorders, miscarriages, and neurological conditions — all without moralizing or hedging.
They cover:
* Pakistan (50–65% consanguineous), Gulf states, Egypt, Jordan, Afghanistan, and UK Pakistani diaspora rates
* Historical European examples (Hapsburgs) vs. modern British royals
* Jewish rates and cultural adaptation to science
* Why chain migration amplifies the practice
* The strategic/political angle some conservatives quietly consider
* Brief but pointed detours into halal slaughter myths, Sharia consistency, grooming gangs, and Maimonides on late-term abortion edge cases
The episode ends with a characteristically Based Camp discussion of cultural sovereignty, techno-Puritanism, and why evidence-based cultural evolution beats top-down bans.
If you value brutal honesty over comfortable narratives, this one’s for you.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
Malcolm and Simone Collins break down one of the fastest cultural shifts they’ve seen: the collapsing power of the “antisemitism” card and the ADL’s controversial attempt to label “Goy Slop” as hate speech.
In this episode, they explore the history and modern usage of the term “goy,” why the ADL’s statement backfired spectacularly, the hilarious internet reaction (including Asmongold’s meme list), and what this reveals about changing attitudes toward Jewish organizations, identity politics, and cultural trash talk.
They discuss:
* The real meaning and evolution of “goy”
* Why policing language like this increases antisemitism
* Sentiment analysis showing overwhelming pushback
* Broader cultural realignment on the right and in the mainstream
* Advice for the ADL and Jewish advocacy groups
A raw, honest conversation on group identity, noticing patterns, and why the old rules no longer apply.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be talking about one of the fastest cultural shifts I have maybe seen in my lifetime- ... towards the inability to play whether it’s the anti-Semite card or the racist card or the homophobe card of- of that being a card that has value in our cultural landscape.
Okay.
And a lot of this comes downstream of a recent ADL announcement. Or- How
Simone Collins: recent are we talking? Like, this year or just now? Like,
Malcolm Collins: yesterday.
Simone Collins: Oh, okay.
Malcolm Collins: Like, it, it’s just blowing up on Twitter right now. People are, are clowning on it.
So basically what the ADL decided to do is attempt to define goy slop, which is a term that a lot of people are using now for unhealthy food that is not good for you to eat, and there’s a fun [00:01:00] video of, like, a sweet old Jewish guy going around and showing, like, kosher foods and being like, “You gotta eat this stuff and not this other stuff.
Look at all the bad chemicals.” Like, “You guys need to know this.”
Speaker 7: Sent this to a friend who loves eating goy slop. I wouldn’t touch this stuff. Anything over two ingredients is goy slop. Nothing but chemicals.
Malcolm Collins: But-
Simone Collins: Okay ...
Malcolm Collins: the ADL came out and tried to
define this as hate speech. And we’ll go into their statement, we’ll go into the history of goy, everything like that. Mm-hmm. But they tried to define it as hate speech. And then you get people like Shoeonhead where one popular tweet said, “Shoeonhead claps back at the LDA...
the ADL referring to goy slop as a slur. Wait, wait. Goy, the Hebrew word that refers to non-Jews. So you have your own little slur for us-” “... but we’re bad for using it ourselves? LMAFO.” And you-
Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s like banning the N-word from rap, right?
Malcolm Collins: Well, no, it’s, it’s, it’s worse because it is a Jewish- Worse ... [00:02:00] slur-
Simone Collins: Yeah
Malcolm Collins: for non-Jews.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And it is absolutely a derogatory word. Like, you can say, like, you as a Jew can try to define it as non-derogatory. Yeah. But if you’re doing that, you’re just going to make people more antisemitic because it looks like you’re treating them like idiots and they’re too stupid to be aware.
And I’m okay of you know, Like gringo. Right? Like, I go to, I go to Mexico, people call me a gringo, right? Like- Yeah,
Simone Collins: or gaijin.
Malcolm Collins: Or gaijin.
Simone Collins: Which is
Malcolm Collins: fine. Or-
Simone Collins: Don’t care.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Most cultures have a derogatory word for people outside of that culture. Mm-hmm. This isn’t a Jewish thing. This isn’t a problem- No
endemic to Judaism or something like that. No.
Speaker: And to be clear here, if you are Jewish and regularly hear Yiddish, you would be very aware that there are multiple idioms that use the term goy in a derogatory manner. It is clearly a derogatory word. And again, it is normal for words to mean outsider to eventually become derogatory, even if they didn’t originally have that connotation.[00:03:00]
Consider the word barbarian in ancient Greek that originally just meant outsider, but eventually came to mean, uh, a lot of derogatory contexts
And Jews will come out thinking we’re f*****g idiots and say things like, “Well, Goy in the Torah is used in a non-derogatory context to mean nation.” And it’s like, yeah, back when it also referred to the nation of Israel. But since about 300 BC in Talmudic writings, which we all have access to, by the way, it’s not just Jews who get to read those, it’s been used in a negative context.
In the same way barbarian originally didn’t have a negative context, but eventually developed one. That’s fine. Don’t treat us like idiots
Speaker 8: And I’m beginning to realize how much anti-Semitism was kept down by the self-deprecating Jewish comedian like we see in the original clip here with the guy actually [00:04:00] talking about Goy slop who’s being honest, , and how much it is risen by the Jewish Karen. And we just don’t have that many self-deprecating Jewish comedians anymore and a whole lot more Jewish Karens
Speaker 9: And the Jewish Karens seem to be completely unaware of American culture and how angry it makes Americans to be told something that we obviously know isn’t true, like that goy in a modern context is not a derogatory term.
And if you are a Jew who is unaware of this, because I’m g- gonna give you the benefit of the doubt, maybe you are just unaware of this because you have no Jewish friends. But I have a lot of Jewish friends. I interact with the Jewish community a lot. I regularly see the term used in that way. In fact, if you read private communications of Jews, as people have done in the Jeffrey Epstein emails, they see it used in that way regularly.
, This is even known to [00:05:00] Jewish children. , There was a clip that I have here of, , a Jewish kid talking to a non-Jewish kid, , saying, “ You don’t know sh- about my friends and family, so you should actually shut the F up. You think I’m going to act towards someone, an arrogant little swine white b***h who S talks Israel knowing nothing about them?
Shut up, you goy C word. Go defend terrorists. Laugh my ass off post your face. Then you’re effing embarrassing. Take your shishka...” This is another Jewish slur for non-Jewish women, , that is way more derogatory than goy, but it’s used interchangeably. Go defend the terrorists like a good little Western goy girl.”
And then he says, “Goy fake ass profile.” , But the point being here is it’s used interchangeably with words like the C word or shishka or, you know, any of these other words. A- and, and we see this in plenty of videos. Again, if you are unaware that this term is used in a derogatory fashion [00:06:00] and you are Jewish, go, like, research it, I guess?
Speaker 3: זה תספורת של גוי או של יהודי? גוי. תספורת שוקו וניל זה יהודי או גוי? גוי. בלורית זה תספורת של יהודי או גוי? גוי.
And when you point out that at one point in history it wasn’t derogatory, that has the same energy as a person claiming the N-word isn’t derogatory because just look at how you say black in Latin languages. Clearly it doesn’t have or didn’t originally have a negative context. And it’s like, bro, that, that doesn’t, um, help your case at all. That makes you look insane and dramatically worse.
The fact that a word wasn’t always negative doesn’t mean it’s not negative in the current context. And in the same voice, the fact that even at the height of the N-word’s use, [00:07:00] it was majoritively used just as a descriptor for black people, not with malice intended, that doesn’t mean that it was not a slur.
, And that is true, by the way. During the height, like if you’re looking at the s- the slave trade and stuff like that, when the N-word was used the most, it was mostly just used as a descriptor. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t pejorative as well.
Essentially the way the defining of a slur works is not the majority use of a word, because almost all slurs when they are made slurs, their majority use is not necessarily derogatory but descriptive. It’s in the minority is the term used in a derogatory context. And almost every word in every language for non-X that’s not non-X becomes derogatory.
So like let’s take Christians for example. There is no word for a non-Christian other than just saying non-Christian that doesn’t have a derogatory context now. Whether it’s heathen, heretic, [00:08:00] pagan, , all of these within a Christian mindset are gonna have a derogatory context and that’s fine. It’s pretending that they don’t that is what is freaking people out.
Malcolm Collins: however, to take that word and then say that other people can’t use it themselves, the groups that it is... It, it would be as if- when you said it would be like banning the N-word- Oh, it’s- It would be like whites were still allowed to use the N-word-
Simone Collins: Oh my God.
Yeah, okay. Yeah ... but they ban
Malcolm Collins: Black people from using the N-word in rap Dear Black
Simone Collins: people, you are no longer allowed to use the N-word. Wow
Malcolm Collins: Like, don’t you know the history of that word, Black people? It might make white people look bad.
Simone Collins: Oh.
Malcolm Collins: I mean, of course we still use it regularly and with impunity, but we don’t want other people reminded of that.
No ... and this is coming down because we’ll go over the reactions to this. Asmogold made another, a big list of like other goy words that you can use because it’s been taken and, and mixed culturally in many ways. Like goyim [00:09:00] beam. I, I think that’s a hilarious name for the anti-uh-
Simone Collins: Oh, yes. The goyim beam
goyim beam. Yes, yes, yes, yes.
Malcolm Collins: The air defense missile in, in, in- Mm-hmm ... ‘cause it’s, it’s shooting down goy rockets, right? I do love
Simone Collins: that, yeah.
That’s good ...
Malcolm Collins: but the, the, the wider thing that’s so interesting to me about this before we go deeper into this is just recently, I’m talking like a couple months ago because we did a piece on this the ADL came out and they said, “Oh, how dare this guy,” ‘cause there was a YouTuber who went to a, a Orthodox Jewish community- Mm-hmm
uh, that was known and is widely accepted to be, have massive problems with welfare fraud.
Simone Collins: Are you talking about Tyler Oliviera, or?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: And then they had him demonetized- ... for doing a piece that was factually honest about a problem that everyone knows about and that would obviously be better addressed by dealing with the community that’s doing this or [00:10:00] distancing yourself from them- Mm-hmm
but not attempting to defend the bad actor, and that’s what we talked about in that episode. But when this happened, there was a bit of a pushback online, right? Like, people were somewhat mad about it but there were still defenders. It was still a two-sided conversation. This time it hasn’t been a two-sided conversation.
It sort of feels like collectively everyone is like, “What are you doing?” Even a lot of Jews in the comments to the ADL are be like, “This organization is supposed to support Jews, but it sure seems like they hate them because they’re making us look terrible.” So, I decided to run a sentiment analysis of this.
Simone Collins: Oh, boy. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, by the way, even, even the, like ADL’s own post got a community note.
Simone Collins: Of course it did. Of course it did, because it’s... this is, this is insane.
Malcolm Collins: Right. So the community note on the ADL’s own piece about this, right? Mm-hmm. Is, “Although it is in subject of much debate, [00:11:00] many Jews and non-Jews consider the word goy to be a Hebrew/Yiddish slur for non-Jews, and not an inherently neutral word.”
Mm. “Wikipedia also notes its use as a pejorative.” So I love that, that that’s the stage that we’re at, that this is getting community noted. And people who know us broadly, we’re seen as broadly philo-Semitic. I’m still, even though Israel and Jews sometimes do stuff that annoys me, I still think of all the groups I could ally with, they’re one of the strongest technologically and in terms of fertility rates and in terms of cultural similarities to my group.
So I, I’m not like an anti-Jewish person saying all of this, right? I’m like, “This doesn’t seem to be working anymore, and let’s talk about that.” So, w- A sentiment analysis, okay? First, let’s go over what the post was. They said, “Goy slop is not quirky internet slang word worth normalizing. It’s an antisemitic slur Born from [00:12:00] white supremacist hate, built on a conspiracy that the Jews deliberately harm non-Jews. @NewYorkTimes should know better than to give this language a platform. There is no excuse for the ignorance of those who use it. Hateful words carry their origins wherever they travel.”
Simone Collins: Okay, wait, wait, wait, mm.
Okay. So because some people have recognized the use of the word goy as not being necessarily flattering to outsiders, and then toyed with it, basically, like, because other people have recognized that some, some Jewish people are not so nice to outsiders, that is, that is... They, they hate Jews therefore.
And, and because they make fun of it, that, that is, that is hate, right? Mm-hmm. So, like, if... Oh, what’s a, what’s a better... Okay, let’s, let’s go back to, like, white supremacy. So, like, if, if, if if some Black Americans were like, “Oh, those white supremacists, like, really appear to hate white people.” Or sorry, “Black people,” and then they, like, made fun of them for doing that, [00:13:00] then it would be considered, like, anti-white hate- Yeah
for them to, like, b- make f- make light of that and make jokes about it, right?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Okay. And I, I wanna be clear here, goy is not as derogatory a term for non-Jews as the N-word is for Black people. Oh, yeah.
Simone Collins: Clearly. For sure. Yeah. Yeah, yeah,
Malcolm Collins: yeah ... it’s, it’s probably closer to a term like-
Simone Collins: Like gaijin or gringo.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, gaijin or gringo is a, is a good it’s, it’s a term you would- It’s just a good, it’s a
Simone Collins: good outsider term ... you would
Malcolm Collins: say- But, you know, like
Simone Collins: if you’re a
Malcolm Collins: supreme- ... to a friend and it wouldn’t have a negative effect on that friendship. No. Like, it would be a laughable outsider term, but it is negative, right?
Like, and it, and it- Like noob. And why shouldn’t it be negative? Again, every group has the right to think that they’re better than other groups. That’s just what it is to have intergroup pride.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But what you don’t have is the right to prevent those groups from using the words you use pejoratively about them.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But to continue here, I did a- an analysis of this, so you can get an idea of how strong the reaction has been.
Simone Collins: Okay. [00:14:00]
Malcolm Collins: The sentiment analysis said 90% are opposed or against it- Mm-hmm ... calling it overreach, gaslighting, et cetera. 5% are neutral or mixed, and 5% are pro it. Like,
it is clown town on the internet right now with this post, and this wouldn’t have happened a year ago.
Simone Collins: It would not?
Malcolm Collins: No, I do, I do not believe the reaction would have been- What changed? ... this overwhelmingly negative. I-
Simone Collins: What do you think changed?
Iran, the war in Iran. We’re just, like, super mad at, at, at anything Jewish because of Israel.
Malcolm Collins: I don’t think it’s the war in Iran. Actually, let- yeah, let’s try to walk through what actually did change.
Simone Collins: The war in Iran.
Malcolm Collins: I- look, I get that that’s part of it, but you have... The, the, the Gaza situation was optically worse for Israel and Jewish people than the war in Iran,
Simone Collins: right?
Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm. Iran was a unified enemy. Basically everyone in Europe agreed that they needed to go. Everyone in Europe agreed, even during the initial bombings, that this was a good idea.
Oh,
Simone Collins: yeah, yeah, yeah. All, all Europeans did. People were [00:15:00] outraged by the protests you know, up until the moment- Yeah ... that action was taken. Iran, something needs to be done, and then something was done. Woo-hoo. The
Malcolm Collins: moment
Simone Collins: something was done- Can you believe ...
Malcolm Collins: everyone was like, “What? What?”
Simone Collins: But it was Israel’s idea.
No. Yeah. Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: like I love the pictures they have on of, like, comedians being like, “I don’t get it.” Like, Trump’s out there saying that something needs to be done about what Iran is doing to these protesters and he’s like, “And he doesn’t even go in and invade. Why doesn’t he invade? If he invades, at least then I’d believe.”
That’s what Bill Burr, who had this big speech about this. Oh,
Simone Collins: really?
Malcolm Collins: Oh, no. At least then I’d believe, you know, that he was a man of integrity and doing what was right for the world. Mm-hmm. He attacks, immediately he’s like, “How could he do this?” You know.
Simone Collins: Checks out.
Malcolm Collins: Many leftist accounts. But yeah. No, I don’t, I don’t think that that was it at all, honestly.
I think it’s more of changing cultural winds. And it’s more of a cultural realignment moving further up the chain of communication.
Mm-hmm.
So it’s been widely understood in, like, our circle of the online internet, right? That you, you can’t pull [00:16:00] this sort of nonsense anymore. Like, “That’s antisemitic,” is just gonna make people hate your group more if it’s not genuinely antisemitic, right?
Like, that’s... Whatever you do, that’s, that’s anti whatever group. That’s anti, you know, how could you say this? That’s hate. Right? Like, these sorts of framings for a long time worked. Even, even in our community, even in the right there would, there’d be politicians who’d be like, “Trump can’t say that.
That’s a, that’s an offensive thing to say that these are, are shitty countries,” or something like that. Mm-hmm. That Haiti was a shitty country was what they were mad that he said. Now, everyone agrees with that Haiti being a shitty... The moment he starts sending immigrant, like, deportees there, they’re like, “How dare you send deportees there?
It’s a shitty country.” But when he said it it was like, “Oh, how, how dare he?” But within our sort of smaller cultural sphere online, this was understood. Then we had the, the first ratchet, which is the left turning on the Jews and turning really hard anti-Israel. And this happened collectively [00:17:00] on the left you know, I’d say maybe half a decade ago at this point, right?
And it’s been very normative within the leftist s- social world, right? Like the, their version of our podcast, right? If there, there was like a mirror world podcast, this has been normal on the left for a while, to just dislike Jews. Whoever dislikes Jews the most, they actually like at TwitchCon even like ranked people on like how much they hated Jews.
Simone Collins: Oh, for the love. Ugh.
Malcolm Collins: They, they had a, a thing where they did that. Like that was a fun thing to do at Twitch, is the give people rankings based on how much they hate
Simone Collins: Jews. It’s such a thing though, that, yeah, people just can’t shut up about Israel. What’s up with this?
Malcolm Collins: Well, you could say there’s biblical reasons for that, but w- ignoring those the...
Well, they do have disproportionate power. They’re the most successful subgroup on Earth. I mean, anyone should be... A- and they’re decent fertility, right? Like anyone should be paying attention to that.
Simone Collins: Sure. Yeah, no, I mean, and then that’s, I mean, ultimately we’re [00:18:00] filosemitic because we are very interested in whoever is competent and who has good operational skills, and yes, who is you know, of-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, somebody asked me
replacement-level fertility ... they go, “Why, why do, why do gay Jews seem to run all the AI companies or be all the major donors in the AI companies?” And I was like, “I got theories on that, but if you keep wondering, fans keep wondering, even if you’re not gay or Jewish and may disagree with them theologically on some areas, do you still want to be in an alliance with them?
It’s because they run all the AI companies.” F*****g maniacs. Don’t piss off the group that’s enormously more powerful than you on the geopolitical stage. But the, the the gay Jews running all the tech companies. We’ll t- we’ll talk about that at the end as well. But- what happened was is the left turned against them, but the urban monoculture hadn’t.
And I’ve been beginning to have a better understanding recently because I’ve been interacting with some people who are of the elite of the urban monoculture, but not of the left. These are the people who run the boring whatever [00:19:00] podcast. We were on some podcast that was, like, just generic, the opinion of the elite, right?
Mm-hmm. Like, the, the, let’s say the New York wife who just doesn’t really wanna pay attention to everything that’s going on. She’s got a, a job that’s a, a high-paying job at, like, a, a private equity firm or something like that. She’s a little insulated from the news. She’s a
Simone Collins: little insu- Autopilot educated elite.
Malcolm Collins: Yes. Autopilot educated elite. That’s who actually runs the urban monoculture. Yeah. And to this group, the autopilot educated elite, it had yet to reach their ears, which was very clear to me when I had a recent interaction with one of them, that, like, the “You’re a racist” line when somebody’s just clowning around or making a joke or whatever doesn’t work anymore and causes immediate pushback.
It still works within their message, their, their, their world. When they’re at a, a company meeting or let’s say a, a convention of, like, [00:20:00] MLM Karens or something like that, right? Like, that, that sort of a person, right? When they’re at their meetings and they’re like, “Can you believe he said goys?”
Like, “He needs to be kicked off the team,” right? Like, “He needs to be fired,” this was still a perfectly reasonable thing to say in their world. And I think that this is an important for all of us to remember. The elite of the urban monoculture are sort of elitist automatons who are quite downstream and isolated from the culture war And they are unaware of it, and it sort of hits their door one day and they just go along with it after it does.
It’s, it’s now the new normal because the sophisticated people who tell them what’s true told them that this is true now. And it actually, I, I was talking to somebody recently, they go, “Why do you fight in the trenches of the internet?” And I go, “Because the trenches of the internet determine what is culturally normative 10 years from now,” right?
The mainstream of MAGA today was born in the [00:21:00] 4chan versus Tumblr w- war, right, of 10 years ago. The, the what became mainstream on Tumblr 10 years ago, if you were a watcher of that, all of the xeno pronouns and all of the extra focus on the trans issues and extra focus on the the, you know, it, it, respect my identity, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
That was like re- that battle wasn’t a battle that the left even had like internally because they just accepted Tumblr culture after the battle had already happened. But this was considered the most degen part of the internet. This was, I mean, the people who were having this battle spent half their time posting furry porn, right?
Like, they were not or, or were just, if, if they were in the, the 4chan side of them, most of them ended up getting canceled or lost their jobs. They were de-platformed before all of this became normalized.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: The battle that we’re having is the next generation version of that battle. But basically what we’re seeing is the [00:22:00] outcome of the battle drift upwards.
Which is to say in the conservative community, it became incredibly bad, th- the community that’s open to working with Jews, it became incredibly bad to say, “Hey, don’t say that, that’s antisemitic,” especially when something clearly isn’t. And then es- and especially if it’s just an internet joke, right?
Like, when it comes to internet jokes, that’s where it gets, like, really bad. And when it’s an internet joke with, like, a side of truth to it disproportionately people in executive positions are of Jewish heritage. Like, that’s something Jews should have pride in. That’s not a, an ethnic slur or anything like that.
And Jews disproportionately, as they should, they have, they have rules around trying to make the entire world a better place. This is true within the Jewish faith. But they also have rules about preferencing the interests of their own [00:23:00] people, as they should. Which is
Simone Collins: not insane. Yeah, come on.
Malcolm Collins: And so when people see large companies disproportionately run by Jewish individuals putting things into food that is bad for people, that is explicitly non-kosher, e.g.
they couldn’t even eat it themselves if they wanted to, it makes them create this stereotype.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: And and I think the noticing, you could say noticing is a bad thing, but that’s really bad. Because as soon as you say noticing the whatever pattern is a bad thing is a bad thing, everybody immediately pays attention to it.
Mm. The, the moment you say not, “This isn’t true,” but, “This is racist,” everybody today is like, “Well, hold on, I better research that [00:24:00] real quick.” So to go, let’s go over some of the memes here because I thought, I thought they were fantastic. Okay.. This just doesn’t work anymore after the Epstein emails,” somebody says. And keep in mind, that did a lot to erode trust in the idea of there aren’t secret cabals that are run by a guy who is at least nominally Jewish. Mm. He did seem to disproportionately care about the interests of the Jews in Israel.
And when we’re like, “Oh, there are cabals doing that,” a lot of people are like, “Oh, well let’s, let’s reenter the conversation.” Next Most Efrati comment is, “LMAO.” Then we have Asmogold saying
Here are some additional horrible slurs that the same bigots online have been using. Hopefully you can use these to better combat antisemitism. None of these are funny, and anyone laughing at them is a horrible person.” Gold steak is fantastic. So the words were goynip, an exciting event or thing that keeps the attention of people who are considered goy.
[00:25:00] Goy slop, a type of food or leisure activity that is indulgent and unhealthy. Goy beam, a military action using particle weapons, usually related to Israel. Goy cattle, worse than goy, even dumber and even more servile. Goycott, definition pending. I like that. That’s great. And goylooping, when a fat and/or retarded person keeps saying the same thing over and over again.
And I like goylooping, ‘cause it’s not even, that one doesn’t even have any sort of an undertone of antisemitism. It’s just sort of talking about the masses not understanding what’s really going on. And then next one here is, “We have a slur for y- a slur we use for all you nons, but you’re not allowed to say it, or else it’s hateful.”
Huh. But yeah. W- do you wanna go into the history of the term goy so people can be like, “Well, well...” Because-
Simone Collins: Yeah, you say so many things with Judaism are incredibly new inventions. How new is this?
Malcolm Collins: Very old. It’s in, it’s in the Bible. It actually-
Simone Collins: What? [00:26:00] Oh my gosh, okay. So this isn’t new at all.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. But it, it initially did not have negative connotations. And, and note here to any Jew who’s like, “It’s in the Bible and it didn’t have negative connotations there,” that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have neg- negative connotations now. And if you’re pretending it doesn’t, you just make yourself look worse or, like, pathologically stupid.
Or, or pathologically... Like, it’s even worse. If, if you as a Jewish person go out there and say goy doesn’t have negative connotations, you create the impression that you are so pathologically blind in the way you see reality that when you see another group being discriminated against in favor of your group, you are unable to see that it is discrimination.
Mm. That it is derogatory, because you so thoroughly believe that you are deserving of a differentiated treatment.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: If I had any other word for Jew that I [00:27:00] regularly used to mean Jew, Jews would out, okay? You’d- I could just make up a word now for Jew. Scuttlebutt. If I just started calling the scuttlebutts out, tomorrow everyone would say, “That’s an anti-Semite,” because it’s why not just say non-Jew?
So anyway in the Hebrew Bible, it is a
Simone Collins: neutral
Malcolm Collins: term. The person
Simone Collins: experiencing Jewness. Yes. You have, like, the neutra- person experiencing Frenchness. All that, yes
Malcolm Collins: For any nation or ethnic group, including the Israelites or Jews themselves. Examples include God promising to make Abraham’s descendants a goy gadol, a great nation, in Genesis 12:2, or referring to the Jewish people as a goy kadosh, the holy nation, in Exodus 19:6.
Neutral descriptions for nations, and it appears hundreds of times, so we see it all over the place. But in the Hellenistic or Roman periods, roughly 300 BCE onwards, especially in the rabbinic or Talmudic literature from the first or second century [00:28:00] CE, it is increasingly shifted to refer primarily to non-Jewish nations or individuals.
The nations equal goyim contrasting with Jews. Scholars like Adi Ofer and Ishan Razan Z argue that a crystallized Jew versus universal non-Jew goy dichotomy emerged clearly in rabbinic texts influenced by interactions with Hellenic culture, Rome, and early Christianity. And keep in mind, these groups were often killing each other in really violent and awful ways.
Like, if I’m gonna drag up old stuff that the Mormons did that was bad, let’s drag up, like, the things that the Jews did. So there’s a famous instance from Josephus where he’s recording of a Jewish garrison that was attempting to put down a Jewish rebellion, and the Jews said to the Romans, “Put down your weapons,” as the Mormons did to the group before they killed them, “and we’ll come in and...”
It was much worse what the Mormons did because it was, like, childrens and families, and they beat them to death. But whatever. The, when the Jews did it I’m just showing I’m giving everyone equal treatment here. They then went in and, and [00:29:00] killed everyone but the commander who converted to Judaism to prevent himself from getting killed.
A, a long story there. This, this was back when Jews were more active in their proselytization and like, “Okay, you, you, you convert, we won’t kill you.” But but that d- it seemed to be more proactive on his part and not, like, a threat on their part. We’re, we’re not, we’re not gonna get into that. But the point here being is Jews had a great deal of enmity for the goy as this term was crystallized.
Yiddish, in modern usage, borrowed into Yiddish and then English from Hebrew, where it commonly means Gentile or non-Jew. In everyday Jewish speech, especially Ashkenazi Y- Yiddish influence contracts, they say it is oftenly neutral like Gentile. However, it can carry pejorative or condescending tones in phrases like goy sheep the, the Gentile head brain.
Goy- sorry, it’s goy sheep cup or stupidity or dullness. So basically i- in Jew, if you say, “To think like a goy,” okay, like, like a literal translation here, you are saying somebody is stupid, okay? Mm-hmm. [00:30:00] Or you can have a Kamish term here in, in, in Yiddish, dos ken nor a goy. Only a goy would do that.
Okay?
Simone Collins: Well, well, I think anyone who’s proud of their culture saying that only an outsider would do that it, it is gonna be derogatory, but that is something you would expect. Like, let’s say you’re really into, like, one sports team. Like, y- you love the Raiders, and you’re like, “Well, only this... I’m so bad.
Some- only this other sports team would do that,” you know, because it’s, it’s derogatory. Or you’re Irish. Like, “Well, only a Spaniard would do that,” you know? It... I, I just, I don’t see how that’s bad. That’s normal.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, which is, is part of the problem. It’s trash talk. Is the, the world has become a trash talk world, and this is now moving further and further up the chain.
This
Simone Collins: is- Well, it’s, the world has become an anti-trash talk world. We’re not [00:31:00] allowed to trash talk anymore, apparently.
Malcolm Collins: Well, no, the, the, the elites of the urban monoculture were always anti-trash talk. Mm-hmm. Especially if it was used against i- a- any group that could be perceived as a minority group or that had some, within their, their hierarchy of discrimination.
Mm-hmm. I think what the Jews realize or what’s happening is the Jews within the urban monoculture completely fell outside the hierarchy of discrimination. Nobody f*****g cares about them in the hierarchy of discrimination world anymore. Even the elites have gotten that memo at this point. Which leaves the side that would still fend for them being the side that they offend by taking a position like this.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: And it’s, it’s bad. Like, I don’t, I don’t... Like, I, I look at this as, as, as an... Like, what do, how do I feel about this? I guess even though I’m fairly philiosemetic, I am happy to see this pushback be as universal as it is. Sure. You know, because [00:32:00] it feels like the faster we get to a place societally where even an organization, even the urban elites who put something out like this from the ADL and are otherwise, like, very cloistered, th- they immediately get, next time something like this comes up, “Oh, we can’t do that anymore.
Like, we don’t get to play this game anymore. This game is over for us.” And that actually will help the Jewish people more broadly, because the longer it takes various Jewish organizations to understand nobody’s playing ball with this and it actually radicalizes people further against you to play the, “That’s antisemitic,” or, “Goy isn’t a derogatory term,” game, the faster everybody is gonna freak out
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And a note here, I’d point out when I’m like, what’s the word for... And this is what, w- for the people who want to play it, the, it’s not anti, it’s not a [00:33:00] derogatory word. Can you give me any word for a non-Christian other than just saying non-Christian, like you could just say non-Jew, that doesn’t carry derogatory connotations?
Heathen, I guess.
Simone Collins: Well, heathen’s derogatory. Infidel is derogatory.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but, but that’s the point I’m making. Apostate’s a- Intrinsically, any word that isn’t just non-Jew or non-Christian is gonna carry derogatory, even if it’s the only word you have. You can’t be like, “Oh, it’s the only word we have for non-Jews.”
No, you have non-Jew. Christians have non- Jew. A Christian doesn’t need to call you a heathen. If a Christian called you a heathen, you’d probably be a little offended by it.
Simone Collins: Yeah, or an apostate or anything. Yeah. Mm.
Malcolm Collins: Heretic.
Simone Collins: Heretic. I can’t... Yeah. Well, I guess you could just call them an atheist or non-believer.
Well, non-believer doesn’t sound good.
Malcolm Collins: Okay, yeah. Well, no, because then you’re defining what they
Simone Collins: are, Jew, atheist. That’s true. Yeah. We don’t know. Right. We don’t know what they believe. Yeah. Mm-mm.
Malcolm Collins: It’s, it’s just a normal thing. D- [00:34:00] stop pret- we all know. Like, everybody knows, right? Like, you don’t need to pretend.
We’re not playing that game anymore. Yeah. We on the right are out here being like, “Dude, it’s okay if you are a separate group than us.” Okay? Mm. It’s okay if you favor- we want to favor our own people. Whatever, right? Like, everybody has a right to do that. You can do that. But you can’t come out here and police, one, you can’t be the fun police, you can’t be the offense police, and you can’t be the how dare you say the word, like you make it known that we use the word in this way.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: By the way, did this sort of shock you in seeing this? I- I’m a little shocked ...
Simone Collins: I’m genuinely shocked that this happened.
Malcolm Collins: Are you
Simone Collins: more- Very strange ... shocked that
Malcolm Collins: the ADL thought this was an okay thing to say, or are you more shocked that the-
Simone Collins: Yeah. No, no, I, I am shocked ... ADL is bad ... because at least historically, I didn’t realize just how effective the ADL was until I saw more information about just how [00:35:00] intense antisemitism was in the past.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: So I’ve realized, wow, okay, actually the ADL has done an amazing job. And so w- what I’m also surprised of is here’s this organization that has actually been pretty effective. They presumably would understand Streisand effects and where to choose your battles, and the fact that they’ve made such a profound screw-up with such a silly thing, it makes them sound sanctimonious and like they’re really trying to just impose on other groups in a way that’s gonna backfire.
Like, their goal should be to reduce antisemitism as much as possible. Now they’re contributing to it, and that’s, that’s-
Malcolm Collins: Dramatically so. Yeah ...
Simone Collins: bizarre to me. Not just because, oh my gosh, the outrage, how could they do, they do this, but actually because they have a long track record of being very [00:36:00] effective at actually reducing antisemitism, so what’s going on?
Like, leadership must have changed- Well, this is what happened ... in a very insane way.
Malcolm Collins: This, this is actually a great thing. The ADL has been so captured by urban monoculture rot at a bureaucratic level that it is now acting in ways that is actively antithetical to its mission of increasing pro-Jewish sentiment.
Hmm.
It’s trying to increase the dogmatic control of the urban monoculture without even realizing it, right? And it’s playing into the urban monoculture’s hand without even realizing it. And if you’re wondering what can you do about this, like, if I was a, a Jew that’s as connected as I am, I would probably have connections to the ADL.
I’d strongly encourage them to hire some outsider, be that us. Mm-hmm. I mean, clearly we’re fairly pro-Jewish. And we have our pulse, I think, on the fing- the, the, the pulse of the internet. Or,
Simone Collins: Our finger on the pulse of the internet ...
Malcolm Collins: yeah, a finger on the pulse of the [00:37:00] internet so they could do that with us or they could do that with y- Nux.
Nux would be great. Nux would’ve immediately- Nux would
Simone Collins: be great ...
Malcolm Collins: Nux is probably gonna clown on this himself. He’s probably gonna be like, “Can you believe the ADL would say something this f*****g stupid?”
Simone Collins: Nux or Asmongold or, well, I mean, Asmongold. I mean, who can afford him, right?
Malcolm Collins: But- Yeah, who can afford Asmongold?
Yeah, keep in mind, if you hire Nux, you’re hiring a Jew, so that’s gonna cost you a bit more, right? Come with us. We’re cheap. We’re white trash over here, right?
Simone Collins: Mm.
Malcolm Collins: Rednecks like us, we c- we come d- we, we... You don’t even need to... You just pay us whatever you want and I’ll review this stuff for you, right?
But yeah, like this-
Simone Collins: Honestly, they would, yeah. I don’t know, I don’t w- I don’t even wanna name how low of a price you’d be like, “
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.” Yeah, sure. I think increasingly companies need to have mechanisms. And if you’re somebody who’s watching this and you’re either at a non-profit or you are in an HR department or something like that, and you are looking for somebody who can vet the way the Internet’s gonna react to [00:38:00] something we’ve played the Internet like a fiddle for a decade at this point, right?
Like, we, we’re fairly good at this particular game. Every outrage cycle we’ve ridden to our advantage, right? Like, there hasn’t been one that significantly did not move us forwards on us. You wanna play the game? Come to us, and we’ll help you as much as we can, right? Like, we- Mm-hmm ... we are hirable for this.
We even have an org for this. Yeah
Simone Collins: Yeah. But it’s I hope they figure themselves out because it’s it’s sad to see this level of incompetence at play. Not to insult them, but There must be something at play here, like some donor, maybe one of their largest donors, this became their pet project.
They’re like, “This whole goy slop thing, th- they’re making, you know, th- this is just antisemitic,” and then they f- foisted it upon the ADL’s team. [00:39:00]
Malcolm Collins: No, I’ll tell you what happened, and I’m fairly sure I can, I can model what happened. Okay. Some urban monoculture Karen who doesn’t really understand the internet saw some meme about unhealthy food, because MAHA is part of Ma- MAGA now, right?
So, like MAGA’s talking about goy slop. MAHA. MAHA.
Simone Collins: MAHA,
Malcolm Collins: MAHA. You know, Wizard Kennedy and everything like that. Like, we’re talking about like the additives in food, the negative stuff about food. And there’s been some viral videos of Jews being like, “You guys, non-Jews, need to stop eating goy slop.”
Speaker 7: It’s no wonder that the goyim want the kosher food. Cheese swirl? Go back to Wisconsin. This is the holy food. Look at the kosher food. . Do you know why I made it to 86? ‘Cause I ate rotisserie chicken and Manischewitz borscht. This is chosen food for the chosen people.
I shouldn’t be telling you this, but I am. Do you wanna help the goyim get off the goy slop and come to our side?
Malcolm Collins: Like that, I think the most viral videos on this were done by like old Jewish guys that sounded very Jewish, right?
Mm-hmm. Being like, “You need to start eating this other type [00:40:00] of food,” right? Like, and they s- they might have seen something like this, and they, they immediately think, “Well, this is anti-Jewish,” right? Because it is in any way could be taken as a criticism of the Jewish people, therefore we have a right to just shut it down.
Because anything anti-Jewish can just be shut down whenever we feel like shutting it down. Because it could for a while. Like this, the, the fact that they were able to de-platform that guy for pointing out a real known problem within this Orthodox community that nobody disputes. The ADL didn’t be like, “This isn’t a major problem.
This fraud isn’t a major problem.” So yeah, I, I guess, I, what I think we need to move more towards, and we even have a company already set up for this anti, anti-bigotry, right? What, what do we call it? DEI Remediation. Deiremediation.com I think we have. So, we have a whole corp for doing this. We got a whole brand for doing this.
You let us know, and we will help you because this stuff is gonna f*****g destroy you. It’s bad. It’s [00:41:00] bad. Because right now what the ADL just initiated was an entire internet news cycle of clowning on Jewish people, and that further normalizes it for the next time this happens. Because everybody knows they’re gonna say stuff in response to this, and everybody’s gonna think it’s f*****g hilarious, and everybody’s gonna go along with it.
Because 95% of the people this time either approved of it, 90% approved of it, 50% didn’t care, and then you got the, the 5% who are against it. And, and frankly I think it’s, it’s probably lower than that Yeah ... if you... But yeah, just be aware culture is shifting, and that cultural shift is making it upwind, upwind, upwind, upwind.
And frankly, this is why figures like Nux are so important to the Jewish community right now. He is in, in the actual culture war that matters. Your [00:42:00] only or primary champion by, like, orders of magnitude like nobody listens, for example, to Ben Shapiro anymore. Like, you guys have had people in the right in the past, I, that had a lot of influence, but they captured institutional positions that don’t matter anymore
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Nux still has cultural relevance. So maybe work a bit more to help him or work with him because he’s your guy’s, like, shot right now at not having the entire online right turn antisemitic. I mean, I guess we’re useful in that as well because we generally argue in favor of, of Jewish interests.
But yeah, y- you guys don’t have ... And have as many like, fallbacks. I, I guess this just needs to be thought through more. Jews are, are s- are smarter than this. Like, Jews should have more both awareness of the cultural game that’s being played and more interest in communicating with that cultural game in a way that [00:43:00] prevents it from going in an antisemitic direction.
And I mean truly antisemitic direction, not calling out goyslop
Also, hold on. Really... Also Jews need to really work, like another, another thing that’s really gonna trigger people going forwards, and I’ve noticed this more and more, and this, they may not see this as that, so I just wanna note this before we h- Saying something is a conspiracy theory that is a blatant and observable fact Really makes people hate you
Simone Collins: Ah
Hmm
Malcolm Collins: Like if somebody says, “Jews control Hollywood” You can quibble about that, but it’s true.
They have a disproportionate level of control in Hollywood and have for genera- since its inception. [00:44:00] That’s not a conspiracy, but when you say that’s an anti-Semitic conspiracy, people are like, “Wow.” Like, “Are we, are we... Like, you’re gaslighting me now? Like, you’re pretending...” Jews control AI. Jews do disproportionately control AI.
Jewish spies manipulate world politics. Mossad has done a spectacular job manipulating world politics. Secret cabals of Jews have disproportionate power in both business, politics, and entertainment. Obviously this is true. We’ve caught one. I, I, others are probably less nefarious. And some of them are even institutionalized.
Well, what do you call Chabad if not institutionalized organization with disproportionate level of control in American politics? That’s [00:45:00] not... That, that just infuriates people. And like, get, just get better at dealing with that and this will likely go down a bit. The swelling will go down. But for now, where do I see things going?
I mean, I see things sort of spiraling in a direction where if filio-Semitic as we want to be, we need to, even internally in our communication, better describe the Jews as a separate people with potentially aligned interests- Mm-hmm ... that are in a good position to work with, but extremely distinct from whatever we are.
And that, that is, I, I think the best way to sort of psychologically handle this in terms of handling this in a way that’s gonna, gonna go in any sort of productive direction. The idea [00:46:00] of a Judeo-Christian singular group I think has shattered. And I, and I think it’s shattered to such an extent that Christians who bet on it have, have had their careers destroyed, Mm
in the past. Like, before they were aware of this. Like Ted Cruz. Ted Cruz bet on this idea, and I think it has destroyed his credibility
Simone Collins: Yeah, I could see that. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: The other thing that’s been very interesting that I’ve seen recede over time is the support for rebuilding the temple among evangelicals.
Really? Which was something... Well, so if you look historically in the United States, there was this big movement because they thought that it would bring about the, the end times.
Simone Collins: Right.
Malcolm Collins: But apocalyptic forms of evangelical Protestantism of, of that- Are they on
Simone Collins: the outs? ...
Malcolm Collins: type yeah, they’re kind of on the outs right now.
Simone Collins: [00:47:00] Huh. Yeah, I guess, you know, I haven’t heard a whole lot about it. People are talking about it being a thing, but I’m not hearing from the people who think it’s a thing, if that makes sense.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. I’m not hearing from them. I, I don’t see them in my conservative circles. I don’t see them in when we’re doing campaigning.
I don’t see them... you know who I do see increasingly in the conservative circles is groups that are much closer to what I, I’d call, like, techno-puritan, like, framing. Like, our framing of, like, Christianity slash science is incredibly and increasingly common among the youths. Mm-hmm. This sort of practical, skeptical, conspiratorial, but ultimately very scientific ex- understanding of Christianity is the one that is really replacing the panicked we, we’ve gotta protect...
And I think the, the Jews losing that have lost a major point for them that could have taken flak for them in this [00:48:00] current sort of online battle.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: Which has also been bad, right? I mean, you go out and you defend this. Like, suppose Ted Cruz went out there and defend this, he’d get clowned on to no end
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Any final thoughts, Simone?
Simone Collins: Just don’t know. I don’t know what to think anymore. I feel like we all, we all just need to do our own things for a while, you know? Stop policing other people’s opinions. Just let them go out there. Like, c- can we just bring back trash talk without the policing?
Malcolm Collins: Well, no. This is the interesting thing.
We, our side, our cultural movement, this online right movement, has effectively policed the ADL’s talking points. Which is to say not just we’re not gonna listen to you, but it is actively [00:49:00] negative for you to be saying this, and you’re hurting your community, and the people who said this are likely dealing with internal blowback or donor blowback at this point.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: So we still police, it’s just on the opposite side. It’s the anti-policing police
Don’t even try to police or it will blow up in your face. It, it, this wasn’t a neutral thing that happened. It’s not like they tried and nothing happened. They tried and a rake hit their face.
Simone Collins: That all just sounds so exhausting. But yeah, I get it. And I, I mean, I’m glad that there is pushback. It is important that there is pushback.
So- Yeah ... I guess it’s fine.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, yeah, I mean, I’m, I’m, I’m getting sick of every- everyone’s sick of, oh, the w- you know, whatever, r- replacement immigration, right? Th- that’s a, a, a conspiracy, right? Like, all these things that they said are conspiracies, it’s like, then why does your side say it in Spain and cheer when it’s happening, right?
Like, why, [00:50:00] why can’t we have these conversations without everything being a conspiracy? When, when all of us can see the statistics and what your side is communicating internally.
Hmm.
Anyway, love you
Simone Collins: I love you too
Speaker 13: What we doing? Well, we’re playing hide and seek and playing ring
Where is
Titan? Who knows? I don’t know where Titan is. Is that Titan?
Are you a crazy girl? Yeah. What do you wanna be when you grow up? Well, I wanna be a shark princess.
What are you gonna do when you’re a shark princess? Well, I will swim in the water really [00:51:00] fast while
Speaker 14: I’m eating some fish that are not pink or purple. So you don’t wanna eat pink or purple fish? Only gray fish and yellow fish and green fish, but not pink and purple fish. And I jump the gray fish and the green fish, and they well, people just do not like meat on their shoulders like that, then sharks will eat them, and that will be really bad, so do not put shoulders on your arms like that, then I will eat you like a shark princess.
So do not go in the water and with meat on your wrist, then a shark will eat you. Then a shark
Speaker 13: will eat you?
Speaker 14: No, you.
Speaker 13: Oh, me? Yeah, [00:52:00]
Speaker 14: if you have meat on your wrist
Well, you found me,
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Are video games the most efficient sin? Malcolm and Simone Collins rank modern sins by their real-world damage — from video games and sports gambling to shopping addictions, plastic surgery, skydiving, OnlyFans, kinks, and more. They break down how to evaluate sins by time cost, financial drain, health risks, negative externalities, addiction potential, and alignment with long-term flourishing.
This episode offers a practical, first-principles framework for thinking about hedonism, temptation, family traditions, and moral trade-offs in the modern world. Topics include gambling vs. heroin, why some “harmless” hobbies are more destructive than others, rechanneling vices into virtues, the value of different lives, and techno-puritan views on self-defense.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to have an interesting conversation around ranking the severity of various modern sins so that we can understand which ones are worse for an individual in, terms of, well, just broad effects they have on your life.
Like, as I’ve pointed out in other episodes, sins are basically a list of things, you know, like don’t cheat on your wife, don’t be mean to people, don’t murder people, like listen to your parents. Stuff that’s just gonna F up your life if you don’t follow it i- in a, in a general format. It’s like a big list of don’t piss on the electric fence and then a- some humans are just like, “But if I just goon all day every day, that’ll feel fantastic, right?”
And it’s like, no, it won’t. Maybe for like a half a day you get to year two of that and you’re living the life of Anna Valen. See our episode on what happened to her life, right? Like going through her [00:01:00] private diaries in our Life of the Sinabyte episode.
Speaker 5: you were an interesting study. Must, greed, deception, fertile ground, but rather mundane.
Speaker 6: Doors to the pleasures of heaven nor hell. I didn’t care, which I thought I’d gone to the limits I hadn’t. The center bytes gave me an experience beyond the limits pain and pleasure.
Indivisible.
Malcolm Collins: it is not happiness at the end of the hedonism maxing tunnel.
As I often point out, if you look at the people in our society who have access to everything they could possibly want, your movie star, your music star, when they indulge in that, when they indulge in the, you know, endless chain of, of women and drugs and everything like that, they often crash out as some of the least happy and satisfied humans alive.
Whereas people who often do not have much, and I’m sure many of you, you know these individuals pious [00:02:00] individuals who just work to give back to the community they’re often some of the most fulfilled people you will ever meet.
And so this is, this is paid off to us, but whatever religious teaching you’re using, and I’m gonna try to keep this, while this is one of the track series, I’m gonna try to keep it useful to not just Christians or Orthodox Jews or anyone, but just broadly anyone because- the, the set of laws that, like, Christians follow seems to generally be useful for other people as well.
That’s why they seem to perfectly overlay with, like, the Noahide laws when Jews are like, “Well, I just want everyone to follow the Noahide laws.” And it’s like, all observant Christians already follow all of those. Like, why are you making this a separate thing? It’s just good rules for life and, and being a member of a community.
But we’re going to start, because where this came up was in a fan call which we have for our paid fans who get [00:03:00] our extra weekend episodes. If you don’t know about that, that, that’s a thing. And they somebody was talking about the relative sinfulness of video games, right? And we’ll be using the Romans quote that’s in here, which is like anything you don’t do for God is sin.
Basically anything you don’t do that you can’t be like, “This is something I am doing for...” whatever for God means to you. Like, for goodness, to, to, to promote humanity, the, you know, moving forwards. Whatever you wanna, you talk, it’s, it’s, it’s something that’s an object to that. Like, purely selfish action, right?
And they were like, video games is a very, very expedient sin. Like, of, of the various sinful things you can do. And, and to give an example of what I mean for this, let, let’s contrast two things, okay, here. Let’s contrast the relative sinfulness of video games versus watching sports, right? Like, both of these things are things you’re fundamentally doing for yourself, for your own self-gratification.
But they have [00:04:00] different impacts or potential impacts on your life. Now, obviously you can engage with either too much in a way that just completely destroys your life. We all know the person who crashed out on Warhammer for five years and then came out of a hole one day and was like, “Ugh.” World
Simone Collins: of Warcraft, not Warhammer.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, War- World of Warcraft. World of Warcraft. That was like a thing- Yeah ... that if you lived through that- In a- ... a bunch of us nerds-
Simone Collins: In a college dorm, like in a certain period of time, there was at least one kid.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Or, and, and, and here I’ll add another one here. Magic: The Gathering card collecting.
Or, or, or no, no, well, let’s just say, yeah card collecting more general. So like non-playable card collecting. No, we’ll use Magic: The Gathering ‘cause it allows us to talk about a, a, a variety of things together. If you are really into, let’s say s- sports, and so you have to, you wanna watch the games the moment they come out.
Now, that already makes it relatively more bad than a video game that you can play at any time, day or night, right? [00:05:00] Because now you’re having to, even if you’re spending the same amount of time on it, that time is not variable, and therefore is going to be more intrusive on your ability to do things that are actually like a net benefit for society or God or whatever, right?
Like you’re, you’re, you’re going to have to maybe not go to the thing with your kids, or not go to the things that you can slot in at any time, day or night. The, the flexibility of a sin is really important to that sin. Then you have the cost, the relative cost. But this is where something like trading cards can get really big because the relative cost of entertainment hour per dollar spend is of, of just about anything you can be into I think the lowest on video games.
Now this is assuming that you are into single player video games rather than either loot box type games, which can be incorporated in single player video games if you are [00:06:00] susceptible to loot boxes. Now note, not everyone is susceptible to loot boxes. Some people can play a game with loot boxes forever and never spend on them.
I think that this is something that you have to ask yourself and, and, and from your own historic behavior. If you know you are susceptible to loot boxes don’t, don’t engage with them. Right? Like d- d- don’t engage with any game that has them. And I’m sorry if that’s like taking things out for you, but one of the most dangerous you know, of all the various things we’re warned not to do, gambling is I think one of the most dangerous.
And the reason why gambling is w- I, I put gambling above something like heroin. Oh
Simone Collins: yeah. It’s just so quickly and easily ruinous.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. It’s- While heroin can kill you in a day, it’s much less likely to, like even, even if it does kill you, like your assets are still inherited by other people, right? Like [00:07:00] i- i- it, when gambling ruins your life, it typically, one, it can ruin multi-generations of life savings just like that.
But two, the people who have an issue with it often borrow against other people when they do it. And the happiness you get from it doesn’t feel very long-term satisfying. It’s like not a good... Like this is the other thing I’ll keep into account when we’re like rating sins is how good is the happiness you get out of it?
The happiness that you get out of gambling is
Incredibly low-grade, superficial most basal of hungers. There isn’t any sort of deep satisfaction like you may get out of beating a really hard video game or something like that, right? And so that’s where keep in mind is the pastime that like when you’re judging the potential sin of a pastime, what other sins come attached to this pastime?
So if you look at something like being into [00:08:00] sports gambling is very commonly attached to being into sports.
Simone Collins: Oh, so what, what, what is also the constellation of related things that you might get into?
Malcolm Collins: Right. So like this is when it comes to something like hur- Yeah,
Simone Collins: like if you really like going, like clubbing, the odds of you getting a drug habit, non-trivial, right?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, explode. Yeah. Which is
Simone Collins: like- Or like developing alcoholism ...
Malcolm Collins: if you go into a bar- Yeah ... this is why we would aga- tr- even if it’s the same amount of time- Mm ... even if it’s the same amount of cost to both go to a bar or go to a nightclub, the nightclub has a much higher probability of leading to an escalatory cycle that is going to do more deleterious impact to your life.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Gosh
Malcolm Collins: But also, but by the way, so an interesting, but I find this to be an interesting, like, broader conversation here. Yeah because it’s something that, that’s, that’s not often thought about, but the moment you begin to frame things like this, you can be like, “Oh, this is a good way for me to think through.”
Also, like, whether you want to engage with something to begin with.
Simone Collins: You’re [00:09:00] also looking at, like, uniquely male habits too. I think that,
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, let’s, let’s elevate some
Simone Collins: female habits ... travel could be one of them for women. Plastic surgery is one of them for women. Wait, what did
Malcolm Collins: you, what was the first one you said for women?
Simone Collins: Travel, plastic surgery, and shopping are, are- Travel, plastic surgery- ... very big ... and, and shopping. Absolutely
Malcolm Collins: Very
Simone Collins: big. Because plastic surgery is an incredibly, for many women, addictive thing. And it is an endless money hole. Also, like, you get to a point where after you have a certain number of procedures done, you have to keep doing more procedures to either fix or maintain procedures.
And that is incredibly expensive. Plus, you just start to look terrible, so that’s not good.
Malcolm Collins: And if, if we’re putting out any sort of teachings around jewelry, I would strongly suggest that individuals treat jewelry the way I did with my wife. Which basically, when you get married, you ask her and you lay out, what is all of the jewelry you want in your, your life?
You know, be greedy. If you, if you had the maximum look, what does that look look like? It is X many pearl [00:10:00] necklaces. It’s X many earrings of these various sizes and styles. It’s X many rings. You create that list for all of the variable ways you could piece together jewelry, and you say, “Okay now with this list, this is where, like, I’m gonna be getting you presents from this list for X many years, and when we get to the end of this list, that’s it.
No more jewelry.” Right? Like, this is all of the jewelry you could ever imagine yourself wanting.
Simone Collins: Yeah, like, you, you can’t develop a, like, “I’m a jewelry collector.” Like, that, that is an incredibly sinful hobby, right? You, this- ‘Cause that is an endless money
Malcolm Collins: hole ... there’s this point where you’re just spending money on more jewelry for the emotional state you get when you spend the money on jewelry.
And like-
Simone Collins: And we, we say this ‘cause we, we know people who’ve had this habit who literally have, for their retirement, owned, like, a condo that they, it was supposed to be part of their retirement portfolio, and they sold it to buy jewelry. Like, this is... So you know, we talk about men’s gambling addictions a lot, I think.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah
Simone Collins: But I don’t think we talk [00:11:00] enough about some problems that women have, I, I’m not really sure why. Maybe it’s, it’s
Malcolm Collins: harder to detect Well, I think that society’s changing more, ‘cause, “Oh, how dare you put rules on women?” But let’s, let’s do th- let’s go through. Like, I think that the same thing that goes with jewelry can go with travel, right?
Like lu- Oh,
Simone Collins: yeah, luxury, and luxury travel is an endless... Like, just one business class flight can send you back... Well, n- sorry, the last time I tried to look at business class flights just ‘cause I was curious was well before oil went crazy with the Iran war. This was like maybe two years ago. Yeah, but, but let’s, let’s talk about- And, like, one flight across an ocean was $20,000 for one person
a
Malcolm Collins: good way to handle travel, right? Because it is an endless money pit, as you say.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: If you are the type of person who goes on the same vacation every year assuming that’s not, like, a drive from your house or something like that, right? There’s likely no point to that. You are not picking up any new additional information on trip number 10 to Hawaii that you didn’t get on trip number one to Hawaii.
You’re not getting any new perspective. You’re not getting any new... this is [00:12:00] purely a hedonistic thing to do and an extremely expensive hedonistic
Simone Collins: thing to do. I mean, I think there’s, there’s something to be said for cultural family traditions. Like, some families, like, every year will all gather at this one place, and that’s a big part of their culture.
Well,
Malcolm Collins: and as I was saying, the important thing about cultural family traditions is that they are not pointlessly orders of magnitude more expensive than an equivalent tradition the family could do. Oh. So, by this what I mean is our family could every year go to Hawaii, or we could every year go to a lake house Airbnb a couple hours from here.
Or we could every year go to the Jersey Shore and rent a place, or even buy a place and have it there, right? As an, as an asset. If we make the active decision to do the thing, like marginally how much better is Hawaii than the Jersey Shore, yet it costs orders of magnitude more. [00:13:00]
Simone Collins: Yeah. No, that’s fair.
Yeah, and even just like food in Hawaii costs so much more that it’s, you have to consider that.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and if you’re like, “Oh, the Jersey Shore is gross,” okay, drive a bit further to Connecticut. I think Connecticut is strictly better than Hawaii. Like the ocean, ocean side- Oh
Simone Collins: my gosh. Yeah, hands down.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah,
Simone Collins: Or Rhode Island.
I mean, if you wanna be fancy, you know, you could do the Hamptons. You could do... Well, not the Hamptons, ‘cause that’s ridiculous. That’s Hawaii level. But maybe like Martha’s Vineyard or Cape Cod or something. Cape Cod’s great. You could go camping in Cape Cod.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And this is what I’m talking about.
What I’m talking about, like I do think that people need some degree of hedonism. You know, the, the, the family traditions you have, the things that you do to entertain yourself. I think if you remove all of those, while some people can live that way, I think Simone essentially lives that way I do not think everyone can live that way and still be an efficient human being.
I, I know I personally can’t. Mm-hmm. And so I do engage with things like video games. But when it comes to something like gambling, it falls into [00:14:00] that category. When we were listing out like really big sins, the trying something just to see if you like it, gambling is probably the biggest red flag.
Simone Collins: Oh my gosh, yeah.
There’s
Malcolm Collins: no reason you need to know if you like gambling. No- That’s
Simone Collins: so true ... appropriate reason. Yeah, it’s like, “Hey, I should try this extremely addictive narcotic. Let’s see if, how it goes. Maybe I’ll like it.” Do you think you’ll like it?
Malcolm Collins: Well, and when you know you do have a problem with something, and this is where I you know, people know I take naltrexone, which is an opioid agonist, which is just fantastic for helping curb the types of addictive impulses that you may have, whether it’s alcohol or masturbation or anything like this, right?
Like, an, i- i- a... The place that it had the biggest impact on my life that I didn’t expect was checking the news every morning when I first woke up, and then checking my Facebook feed and checking the latest comics and checking the, That behavior just went away, Oh ... after I started taking it. And a lot of people can say, “Well, you shouldn’t be removing the sins from yourself like, the temptation from the sins.”
And I’m like, “Bro, like, Jesus was literally the guy who was like, [00:15:00] ‘If your eye leads you to sin, tear it out.’ Like, ‘If your arm leads you to sin, cut it off.’” Like, he obviously didn’t mean exactly that in context, but if you’re going with the vibe of the message naltrexone would fit perfectly in this. Now, obviously this doesn’t work for Catholics because Catholics know that the church actually had to once rule on priests who were castrating themselves to not be tempted by sin.
And the church ruled against doing that, which seems very weird to me in the line with, you know, the Bible’s teaching, but whatever, right? You know.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: The point here being you don’t need to expose yourself to something. Like, we have the technology, and as technology advances, I think one of the areas I want to see it advance the most is on the mitigation of sinful impulses.
Like, imagine a society where people don’t feel these impulses to the same degree anymore. You know, you literally cut out the eyes, right, of society moving forwards. And we’re beginning to see that with stuff like Ozempic, right? Like, is, is Ozempic not a, a category there that we’re seeing? And this is where something like gluttony can be extra [00:16:00] bad because when we’re looking at sins, another thing we need to keep in mind in sort of the grand ranking of sins is the probability that it’s going to kill you.
Because that has enormous externalities on everyone that’s counting on you and your ability to do anything in the future, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And anything that falls into the category of actively leading to your death which can happen in two categories. One can be something like gluttony. Another can be where it’s, like, just literally unhealthy or something like orgies, right?
Where you may get diseases and stuff like that and you need to be- Yeah,
Simone Collins: or like before I met Malcolm, I liked BASE jumping. I liked
Malcolm Collins: skydiving. I liked- Well, I’m, I’m gonna put that in the second category.
Simone Collins: Oh, okay.
Malcolm Collins: So these are things that are just actively unhealthful. Yeah. Then there’s things that come with a risk of severe injury or death.
Simone Collins: Oh, okay. So there’s sort of the chronic bad health, which I would also include, like, habits of just staying up incredibly late and not getting enough sleep. That’s really bad for you.
Malcolm Collins: Yes, ‘cause you’re trying to push me to work less right now.
Simone Collins: Yeah, Malcolm, duh.
Malcolm Collins: No, but I, I agree with that. You can [00:17:00] be indulgent in your work, and I need to be aware of that because- Yeah, your sin,
Simone Collins: you
Malcolm Collins: are sinning
it is killing me and dying.
Simone Collins: Yes.
Malcolm Collins: Which it could really at this point when you look at how much I work.
Simone Collins: Yes
Malcolm Collins: Hey, but look at how much RFAB has improved.
Simone Collins: Guys, tell him to go to sleep, please. Ugh. Anyway, go on.
Malcolm Collins: Gluttony, where was I, where were they going was, was gluttony
Simone Collins: There’s the
Malcolm Collins: two categories Gluttony.
Simone Collins: Oh, yeah, yeah There’s the one
Malcolm Collins: that’s chronically bad- But then there’s the category of- ...
Simone Collins: and
Malcolm Collins: then
Simone Collins: there’s the one that’s acutely bad ... the risk
Malcolm Collins: of death or severe injury. Yes. And this really matters when it comes to, like suppose you’re in school and you’re choosing your sport.
Something that you should be very aware of in that choice is what is the chance that this could give you a life-changing injury? So, if you’re considering between extremely high injury sports like, say, crew or cheerleading- Wait, crew? Crew has incredibly high... Because you can catch crabs, which basically means your, your row hits the water at the wrong moment vis-a-vis everyone else moving forwards.
Yeah. So the forwards motion of your boat catches your oar and throws it into your [00:18:00] face.
Simone Collins: Oh.
Malcolm Collins: Um, With all of the momentum of everyone on the boat- Oh ... and the speed of the boat.
Simone Collins: God. I didn’t know that. That’s horrible.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Easy, easy to become paralyzed and stuff like that. Oh.
Simone Collins: Dude, okay, guys, if you wanna do, just do outrigger canoe racing.
Really fun and you don’t have- but yeah, outrigger canoe racing, really great. If you like crew but you don’t wanna die- ... outrigger canoe racing, I mean, your boat might flip, ‘cause, you know, they do that And
Malcolm Collins: this is what we’re talking about here.
With any of these, there are variable things where you could get an equal amount of pleasure or whatever satisfaction you’re getting- Yeah ... that don’t come with the same negative externalities.
Simone Collins: Totally. And
Malcolm Collins: in the categories of sins, actively choosing not to look this stuff up falls in the same category.
Mm. You
Simone Collins: should,
Malcolm Collins: you should, before you sign up for an extracurricular, look up the risk of death or serious injury from that extracurricular.
Simone Collins: Yeah, for real. Like, in high [00:19:00] school, I was on an outrigger canoe racing team, and then I looked at joining crew in college. At no point did I have any idea, ‘cause I almost joined GW’s crew team.
I didn’t know that could happen. The only reason I backed out was I was like, “Oh, I will have no life if I join this team,” because it’s so-
Malcolm Collins: Well, and that’s the other thing, is how much of your life does it consume? Like, that is-
Simone Collins: Totally,
Malcolm Collins: yeah ... you are almost certainly... And this is the thing. Even if you’re doing sin for hedonism, there are some times where you’re just doing a sin that is absolutely pointless- Yeah
in terms of the amount of hedonism it’s getting you. Yeah. Like, going to Disneyland is f*****g pointless. There is no way that that was the best use of that money.
Simone Collins: No, fair. Yeah, and one, I think one thing that we discovered too when we took our kids to places before we were, like, really thoughtful about it and taking a first principle’s approach, was like, “Well, okay, what are our kids actually obsessed with?”
And it’s never, like, the concept of Disney or the concept of whatever it is that’s happening. It’s like they hyper-fixate on, like, “I like to throw rocks in this thing,” and that might [00:20:00] not even be what they’re supposed to do, right? And so you can just replicate that most likely at home. And you know, that’s-
Malcolm Collins: Right.
Like, consider the alternative, like what I do with the kids, right? Is I get a little inflatable boat with a small motor, and we drive around the lakes around here, and we go around the water, and we catch crayfish and little fish and throw rocks, and they build dams.
Speaker 16: Hey, where are you guys going?
Malcolm Collins: And that is almost certainly for kids their age as fun as waiting in lines, ‘cause that’s what Disneyland really is, is a, it’s a line simulator.
Speaker 8: so then there’s lines for fast pass. You stand in line to get a take it to stand in line later. Then there’s lines for the bathrooms, lines for the drinks, lines for can, and [00:21:00] cans.
Malcolm Collins: A- and you could be like, “Well, what about the novelty?” Okay, well, even if it’s about the novelty, there’s going to be a local park to you that’s going to have about the equivalent of Disneyland, maybe 20% less or something like that. Oh,
Simone Collins: you mean like an actual theme park.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Like Hershey Park for us or something. Like
Malcolm Collins: Hershey Park or something, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: It’s gonna be strictly personally, I don’t think it’s any worse, but i- i- you know, assuming, like even if you go to Disneyland, I still think Universal’s a better studio.
Simone Collins: Yes.
Malcolm Collins: But, but what I’m saying here is, is to apply all of this with a degree of intentionality.
And then to look at this with the risk of injury, also risk of any other sort of long-term negative effect on your life. So like if there is a Magic: The Gathering’s a good example of this, right? Okay. If you end up getting addicted to card collecting, which a lot of these people do, Magic: The Gathering can just siphon money from you endlessly.
You c- you can never have enough decks. You never have enough cards. You [00:22:00] never have enough, you know, much more so than something like getting really into, to Dark Souls or something like that. And then the next thing we need to consider and, and obviously the highest category of sin within these activities is anything that could just kill you.
Like, in terms of BASE jumping, parachuting out of an airplane, hand gliding hot air ballooning a lot of these things are just like Oh, personal plane flying. Like is there really not some other activity that you could get the same amount of marginal enjoyment from that doesn’t run the risk of just killing you?
And also isn’t worth tons of money. All of those are also enormously expensive hobbies.
Simone Collins: Yeah, there’s that. Yeah.
Actually, just recently I think eight people died in a skydiving plane accident. They’re rickety planes, so it doesn’t surprise me. I remember thinking when I sky dove for the first time, the only time, [00:23:00] like, “Oh, th- this is probably how I’ll die.”
It was- ... like held together with tape. So.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. No, but these things, like just recognizing, because I, I think a lot of religious traditions, ‘cause people in the past didn’t randomly do stuff for fun that could get them killed for no reason. This is like a modern invention of sinfulness that we just invented out of the ethos.
An- anyone historically would be like, “Why would you do something that could just get you killed?” Right? Mm-hmm. Like, we invented an entirely new category of sinfulness that the Bible didn’t even know it needed to warn us about. Therefore, that’s why I’m, I’m doing this. That’s why I’m putting this together.
Speaker 20: Now I need to be clear here. This isn’t out of line with passages from the Bible. You know, if you look at something like Proverbs 22:3, “The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty.” Or Proverbs 14:16, “One who is wise is cautious and turns away from evil, but the fool is reckless [00:24:00] and careless.”
Or Ecclesiastes 7:17, “Do not be over wicked and do not be a fool. Why die before your time?” , And, and so you can see this isn’t out of line with what the Bible is teaching, but it just never explicitly says, because I don’t think anyone around the time any of the biblical books was written would randomly risk their lives over simple thrills.
, People back then simply weren’t that indulgent and stupid, so it didn’t need to be laid out like this
Malcolm Collins: But now I wanna go into, to the next category. That cruising
Simone Collins: is crazy.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Ugh.
Malcolm Collins: Is thinking through the negative externalities of the type of sin that you are engaged in. So a good example of here could come down to something like corn, right? If you were going to rank, because obviously if you’re masturbating, well, I don’t think it’s like enormously sinful when contrasted with other things that you might do.
It’s still clearly not something you’re doing for God, which makes it [00:25:00] sinful, right? If you are now considering the various ways that you can engage with not-safe-for-work material I think obviously the highest form of negative is hiring a prostitute to cheat on your wife, right? Like, that, that’s where you get it the highest level of, of, of negativity.
Or I guess also- Because
Simone Collins: of the money spent or what?
Malcolm Collins: Well, because it has money spent on something that’s completely pointless from a f- family perspective. Two, you are creating a negative externality for the woman you’re paying, not just for your wife, not just for your family, because you could, one, get a disease from her, which creates more of a negative externality than other ways you could go out and, and do that.
But also you have now created a profession that can ruin this woman’s life, right? Like, a lot of these women who get into this, they end up speccing into this OnlyFans build, I guess you wanna say, right? While they’re young, not building up their skills, not building up a real job record. Then they lose their looks, and now they’re [00:26:00] kind of screwed.
Although I have heard, did you know this? That older women at, like, nightclubs and strip clubs and stuff like that actually get paid more than younger women?
Simone Collins: That makes sense because I feel like they would put in more effort.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, effort, experience, and I don’t know, maybe guys. I, I don’t know the full, but apparently this is also somewhat true on some not-safe-for-works. I, I don’t, I don’t know all the mechanics of this. I, I’m not gonna go deep i- into it. But there is a point after which you’re just not gonna get anyone and you’re gonna be completely screwed and no guys wanna marry you, and so you can’t settle down.
You can’t have a family. You can’t easily... You know, it, it’s gonna be much harder after that, right?
Speaker 22: That, that chair with the garbage bag taped over it looks pretty good. Meg, you look pretty next to her.
Malcolm Collins: And so, a- and this, this matters, like, building this sort of internal ranking. Like, if you’re gonna have... Like, let’s just suppose you’re engaging with content online, right? The, the lowest category in terms of sinfulness would be purely drawn [00:27:00] or...
Well, no, AI-generated content would be the lowest because no other human was ever even engaged with that. Then the next would be drawn stuff because it, it, some woman isn’t making this her life work. Then you move into actual photos and videos of real human women. You have to shut up. You have to stop it.
Because now you are promoting an industry That creates these negative externalities. Then one step up from that is OnlyFans. Because now you are actively lowering, because remember, it, your time, like the time, effort that you could be spending on attempting to contribute to whatever you think has intrinsic value is competing not just in terms of time, but in terms of money.
Because money, in a capitalist system it, it, it can buy time, functionally speaking. Not perfectly, but, but that’s what you spend your time on. You generate the money. The money can be translated for time. That’s what we do this for, right? So when you are s- actively spending money on an OnlyFans account or something like that, especially if you’re in a [00:28:00] relationship or married, because now it’s money that should be going to your kids, should be going to your wife.
That, that puts that and yet a higher tier. And I think that this is useful to think through, right? Instead of just bucketing it all as being exactly the same. In terms of the orders of magnitude worse I would put something like OnlyFans at 10,000 times worse than AI-generated content in terms of, like, the active scale of badness.
Simone Collins: Well, yeah, because of the, especially the ROI. Like, if you put the, the, the amount you can get of value from AI token-based purchases versus what you’re getting with OnlyFans, was, which isn’t, in I would argue, 90-plus percent of cases, unless you’re going after, like, very- ... very low-ranked people you’re not interacting with the actual model anyway.
So like, so you’re paying this much to interact with someone in, like, India or Pakistan [00:29:00] or Vietnam, or I don’t know who, who knows where, right? Who’s not the woman. You’re, you’re paying a, a huge amount of cup and it’s not, you’re still affecting someone’s life, so.
Malcolm Collins: Well, and worse, you’re entering an environment that falls into the earlier sin category we were talking about, where the woman has a motivation to attempt to addict you.
Mm ... a lot of the OnlyFans pipelines are really heavily AB tested to try to get you addicted to them. That’s the point. They want you as a permanent customer. It’s the same way where, like, if you are paying money to someone for sex that person has a motivation to attempt to break up your existing relationship, right?
Like any sort of long-term stable fications for society relationship you have, they now have a motivation to disrupt that for you.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: And- I suppose Yeah, yeah. So I, I think that that is a ca- and this is worth thinking about. Like a- again, something like let’s consider categories here. Video games versus skydiving.
The, the [00:30:00] relative negative externality to your life, assuming you don’t get addicted to video game gambling is I, I might say a millionfold less bad. May- maybe more than a million. I, I might literally say it is a... No, no, I’d actually maybe a billionfold less bad to spend a night playing video games than it is to skydive or free climb or any of those things that have these giant externalities to your life.
Because there is no chance that I accidentally kill myself playing a video game, right? And when you think about all of the downstream effects of your death for something that in terms of the pleasure that you can harness from the two events I, I’d honestly be very surprised if somebody gets more acute pleasure from skydiving than they do for video games, which makes it even worse Well,
Simone Collins: I, I don’t know.
I’m incapable of garnering pleasure from- ... playing video games, as we’ve discovered, much to your-
Malcolm Collins: But you [00:31:00] gain pleasure- ... dismay ... from watching your romance shows. Do you enjoy- Yeah ... those more than skydiving? Like, it a- the f- the, the three or four hours it takes to make- So it’s- ... a full skydive ...
Simone Collins: it is, it’s hard to...
Yeah, I mean, it, like, it’s a specific high. It’s the adrenaline. Like, that’s why I like jumping off things. And it’s not, you would think, oh, well you’re only enjoying that for, like, the few seconds that you’ve jumped out of the plane. That’s actually the least interesting part because falling from the sky, as it turns out, just feels windy.
Like, if you’ve ever leaned into a heavy wind that can hold you up when you lean into it, you have experienced what it feels like to skydive. Congratulations.
Malcolm Collins: But- So is, is it literally just an addiction to a chemical reaction your body
Simone Collins: is producing? No, yeah, it’s, it’s the buildup. It’s the waiting in the hangar.
It’s the getting on the plane. It’s the going up. It’s the harnessing up. It’s the leaning out of the plane. It’s the deciding to tip out. Like, that, that is where that high comes from, and it’s unique. It’s not something you can get from a video game. The same with, like, jumping off high things, like bridges into water or-
Malcolm Collins: But
Simone Collins: does it feel-
cliffs into water ...
Malcolm Collins: good? Or does it [00:32:00] just feel different?
Simone Collins: You feel alive in a different way. Yeah, it just feels different.
Malcolm Collins: Which I think is really pointless. Like-
Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, and I think, I think what a lot of people have come to realize is that, like, you, you can get a very similar kind of high from, like, a cold plunge.
So I think when, when we’re talking about, like- ... the crew versus outrigger canoe racing, like, if you want that wind taken out of yourself, like, oh, like you, you feel alive-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ...
Simone Collins: get a bucket of ice water. Like, it’s really not that hard. Like-
Malcolm Collins: And that generally has positive health effects from what I’ve
Simone Collins: heard.
It does, yeah. Like, there seems to be, like, an evidence-based argument for cold plunges on a regular basis. It, it, and, and the, the thing is they’re unpleasant in a way that, I guess skydiving is too. Like, you’re waiting in a hot hangar. You’re paying money. Like, you know, it’s... So yeah, I think i- if you want that kind of feeling and you really need it, just get a cold plunge and enjoy the additional health [00:33:00] benefits, ‘cause it’s aligned with probably your objective function more presumably, ‘cause your objective function should probably involve being able to do a thing which you have to be alive to be able to do.
So-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ... there’s that. Well, and this is where... Because I think it’s, it’s important to think about when we hear something’s sinful, we just think, like, “Don’t do it.” And why it’s useful to create these, like... When, when we’re looking at various sins and temptations in our lives and we think about their relative negativity to us, right?
We often don’t fully think through how relatively negative they are. Yeah ... consider something like- me so let’s, let’s consider my desire to socialize, right? Mm. I, I could have that- What desire? ... exercised in, in multiple ways in my w- life, right? Like, I could go to parties, I could go to bars, I could go to cities.
And if you look at the way that Simone and I actually have ended up doing that in our lives [00:34:00] what we’ve done is we said, “Okay, what we’re gonna do is once every few months, like maybe every four months now, go to New York or DC, rent out a place, invite all our friends over and people we don’t know as well, just famous people in the area and be like, ‘Hey, you wanna come over?
You wanna come to a party?’ You know, interesting for socialization, so we’re still top of mind, everything like that.” And this prevents us from having to do a bunch of other things that may be involved in a choice like, where do you live? Like, we’re able to live in a location where it was very inexpensive to buy a house, very inexpensive to buy groceries, very inexpensive to live, and that frankly is healthier.
You know, you’re not in the city smog and everything like that. And nicer looking. I look out my window and I see a jungle every day, right? Than, than living in Manhattan or living in, in DC. But I still get the socialization because I very intentionally cluster it all. But then even more than that, if I’m just looking for...
If you’re like, “I couldn’t get away with just doing this once every four months,” there are ways [00:35:00] you can socialize that have positive externalities as well. So an example here would be my Leaflet streams. So on a Leaflet stream, I’m doing a 10-hour conversation with Leaflet typically, right? And you can find these recorded on like Twitch and Kick and everything like that if you’re interested in watching them.
But these streams often get over 20,000 views. You know, so not only am I there having a conversation with somebody and masturbating the social part of myself, right? Like, I’m doing the social thing, which does feel good to do, right, to, to, to talk with somebody who you enjoy speaking to and who shares similar interests than you, without having to get in a car, go out and interact with strangers, risk getting sick.
Keep in mind, you’re doing that every time you leave your house.
Simone Collins: Oh my
Malcolm Collins: gosh,
Simone Collins: yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Risk y- you know, it, it, you, you risk being killed when you go out. That’s the other thing to remember. If you go to like a nightclub district, people always get shot in the, you know. Well,
Simone Collins: but also like every time you get in your car, don’t forget.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. [00:36:00] Every time you get in a car, you’re risking your life. And, and that’s, that’s why I think it’s generally good to like cluster those things, and to, when you think about, like, the car you get, it’s upon you to research what is the riskiness of this car to your life. Any closing thoughts here, Simone?
Simone Collins: I don’t know. You’ve, you’ve, you’ve given me a lot to think about actually. I hadn’t thought before about Even looking at sinful behaviors and being like, “Okay, what is the thing that I’m getting out of this and how do I do it better?” I mean, we, I obviously did this, or with the help of my dad and his advice, did this with a sin of mine that was really damaging, right?
Like, I loved controlling how much I ate, but that involved dying. And so she didn’t eat anything. Yeah. Yeah. And so he’s like, “Okay, I see what you wanna do here is control and feel that form of a high. So here’s another way you can do it without dying.” And so instead we just balanced calories in and calories out, and had me weigh and measure and enter into a [00:37:00] program everything I ate.
And then suddenly I wasn’t dying anymore. And I think it’s a really good idea to take a look at things that we’re doing that are problematic, and I’m just gonna be thinking for the rest of the day today, “Okay, what am I doing now that is not good for us? What do I actually want when I’m doing that and how can I do that better?”
Ideally in a way that just helps everyone in the family, that actually contributes to us. Like, the idea- Mm-hmm ... of, of taking like a skydiving or BASE jumping addiction and turning it into a cold plunge addiction, right? You’re taking a vice and turning it into a virtue while still getting the thing, like most of the thing out of the vice that you liked.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Oh, and consider something like intermu- mural sports as a sin, for example, like in school. Your parents, the people who already have to drive you state to state for competition. Oh my gosh. You know, you’ve gotta g- go to these regular practices, which again takes up the time of the people who drive you.
They’re just enormously sinful, and we don’t think about them as sinful things. Mm-hmm. They can eat up huge amounts of your life that could be spent on self-improvement or attempting [00:38:00] to use the, the instrument you have honed yourself into to improve society for something completely indulgent.
Simone Collins: Yeah, yeah. Well and, and one person’s sin could be another person’s perfectly good thing. Like, if for example for one person, participation in a sport requires their whole family to sort of derail their lives and spend a lot of time driving, but then the other person, like, happens to live right next to, to a, like, major gymnastics gym or whatever, where all they have to do is walk over and it’s a really good place for them to be, like, then maybe it’s not.
I think everyone has to consider for themselves what the cost is and what the alignment is.
Malcolm Collins: So. Yeah, yeah, and to be honest with yourself around wh- what- Yeah ... the things that you spend your time doing on any given day, on any given week. Like, if one of your core tasks in life at that time is finding a partner, unfortunately you have to do social things.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Th- like that, that becomes one of the things that you just have to do. That was the primary reason I did anything social ever in my life, was trying to find a [00:39:00] partner.
Simone Collins: Well, that’s done. Maybe.
Malcolm Collins: No. Once, once you get a good wife, that’s the great thing about a good wife and kids, you don’t need friends anymore, right?
You can just cut all that nonsense out.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, I guess you have to still play the field in case I die, but whatever
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. I mean, I, I, I gotta know some people. I, I’m just gonna honestly reach out to fans. I’m sure there’s some fan who wants to marry me.
Simone Collins: Oh, God.
Well then, there you have it, ladies and gentlemen.
And with that, we will leave you. Well,
Malcolm Collins: especially if the fan’s like a widower, too. That would be super easy
Simone Collins: No, you would be the widower and they would be a
Malcolm Collins: widow I... No, they could be a widower too if they’re, like, still my age No,
Simone Collins: no, no. A widower, Malcolm, widower is the name for a man who lost his wife.
What
Malcolm Collins: is a
Simone Collins: woman? Widow is a woman who lost her husband Oh, a widow.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins: Unless you wanna enter a- Gay relationship ...
Malcolm Collins: gay
Simone Collins: marriage, that’s fine. The, the, the people who hate you will love that so.
Malcolm Collins: But I- It’s- But I think that this, this can be applied to sexual, like, in, in regards to, like, kinks.
‘Cause I think in our [00:40:00] society we frame kinks as being, like, hugely sinful. Whereas I would point out that a lot of kinks that you may engage with have literally no negative externality but the time you waste.
Simone Collins: Well, yeah, like- Like- ... that, and this, this came up when we were discussing Byron, Byron Nome, Christy Nome’s husband, who had the- Yeah
femmification interest. Had he just, like, found a community that would, like, exchange this stuff and talk about it or whatever, and, like, he, he got his big boobs and everything and, like, did his thing without spending tons of money, I would not have really seen it as sinful. It’s like, you do you. Like, that’s fun for you.
I get it. Go ahead. Like, have... This is great. It’s very common, okay? Like, it’s an extremely common thing. But instead he spent, I think, over $20,000, maybe even over $16,000 on just, like, one person, and that’s where, okay, like, this is, this is to your family’s detriment. This is to your financial detriment.
Like, this is money that could have kept you stable in retirement. This is money that you could have contributed towards something that’s aligned with your [00:41:00] values. ‘Cause I doubt his values were-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah ... supporting women who- and, and this is where, like, okay, so, so suppose a kink, like, we’re gonna rate kinks here ‘cause this, this is useful to, to, to, to be aware of.
If, if you’re engaging with it in an entirely fictional context, like an AI-generated whatever thing the negative externalities it can have to your life are incredibly low, especially if it’s on a local encrypted thing like RFAB or something like that.
Simone Collins: Yeah. So
Malcolm Collins: I put that at, like, the lowest category.
But if you’re talking about, like, actually acted upon things you know, at the low end you have things like, say, rope binding or something like that, right?
Simone Collins: Shibari.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, which is just whatever, right? Whereas at the, the very highest end you have things that are going to make you sterile. These are things like testicle inflation that’s become, ballmaxing it’s called now.
Oh
Simone Collins: my gosh, yeah.
Malcolm Collins: No, no, no, no, no. Or orgies or y- you know, something can be very ta- like, a choking fetish is a very tame fetish. Oh,
Simone Collins: yeah, don’t. Yeah, don’t, don’t.
Malcolm Collins: But if it can cause severe injury- Don’t do it ... don’t engage with it [00:42:00] with another human, right? Like- Don’t do it.
Simone Collins: No. No, no, no, no, come on.
Lots of people die doing it to themselves. Don’t do, don’t say
Malcolm Collins: that. Oh, to... No, I, I meant, like, use AI or something like that. Just don’t actually do
Simone Collins: it. Oh, imagine doing it. No, I think it’s one of those things where you have to feel it. Get, again, if you’re into that, get into cold plunges. Y- you know, again, just I feel like so, so many things.
A cold plunge. Do it.
Malcolm Collins: Well, yeah. With, with all of this, I don’t think we think about, we think of all depraved things as being at the same relative level of depravity often. And when we talk about the negative externality on other people, this is where something like being a PDA file, like immediately enters the highest category if, if you’re doing that with another human being.
Yeah. Whereas something like
Lo- l- like el- elcon artwork, which is a very you know, whatever topic online about whether this is immoral or not immoral because it doesn’t involve real underage people. Yeah. But I’d put it in the category of we all know it’s not the same level of immoral. Yeah. If it could tempt you down a [00:43:00] path where the end state is that, then it is extremely immoral for you.
Yeah,
Simone Collins: in the same way that you say, like, well, getting into, like, team sports can be a, a, a gateway to sports gambling, in the same way that content could be-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that it can be extremely immoral in that way.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: I guess what I would say is if any... O- one is, probably my biggest question with this is is there not something else that turns you on just as much or more?
Yeah,
Simone Collins: can’t, can’t we, yeah, can’t we go with something else? That there... Yeah ‘Cause, yeah, typically most people have a basket of things. Let’s go with something else in the basket.
Malcolm Collins: Of all of the various things that turn you on, there probably is something, but I wanna point out that how much worse is an art of this versus it happening to a real human or you consuming content- Oh
of it happening to a real human.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Malcolm Collins: yeah. I, I would say it’s, again, one billionth as bad.
Simone Collins: Well, of course.
Malcolm Collins: One, yeah, easily less than one billionth as bad probably.
Simone Collins: Yeah, which is why people are like, “Why are you [00:44:00] questioning me?” When people are like, “Look, I think that, you know, synthetic versions of this are, you know, not so bad.”
But,
Malcolm Collins: but, but- ‘Cause compared to- ... do I think that if you’re a fan of Rev Says Desu, the next day you’re gonna be into underage kids or something like that? Like, no, I don’t. Do- Yeah ... do I think that Leaflet fans, ‘cause her character looks very young. She’s very old in the lore, but it looks young. Yeah. Do I think that the next thing you’re gonna be out there- You know, elves, elves
Simone Collins: are quite old.
I guess that’s how, isn’t that how, like, anime gets around it? It’s like, well, but she’s like a 200-year-old vampire girl, so
Malcolm Collins: it’s fine. Sometimes anime doesn’t care about getting around it, I’m gonna be honest. Okay. Okay. And like Japanese people, we all have our regional temptations. Yeah. You know, it might be Mormons and cucking and Japanese and underage in, you know, my region, and I’ve talked about that before.
Yeah
Speaker: So if we’re just gonna put things next to each other in a line here, , I might say something like, , furry or anthro corn might lead you to getting into the furry community if you are susceptible to temptations like that, and then that has a high probability of making you become trans, which can have a lot [00:45:00] of negative externalities on your life.
So it can be put in a category that is strictly worse than, say, maybe non-furry content, right? , Or if you say something like, , PDA content, right? Like, , l- LCON content that we’ve been talking about here. , It would be strictly worse than the, , anthro content because, , the end state that it might tempt you towards, , being a PDA is way worse.
,
Speaker: But a lot of things in a drawn context might be morally equal to neutral corn, , outside of maybe it motivates reproduction less. So let’s say like fart content, or, , you’re into pregnant-looking chicks, or you’re into, , breeding fantasies, or you’re into,, being demeaned by people. , All of these would be...
Like there’s, th-th-there’s just not that many negative externalities that can lead from this stuff.
And while sex that is [00:46:00] purely recreational, , but done with it being understood that the person might get pregnant, in a way where they might get pregnant, and you will keep the baby if they get pregnant. Now keep in mind, it is really bad to have sex where a person might get pregnant and you would never keep the baby.
, Or even question it. That’s extremely, extremely bad. But if we’re talking about sex with kinks involved, purely for recreation, worse than sex purely for reproduction, but probably better than any category of corn, no matter how kinky it is, unless it risks killing you, like certain types of choking or something like that, right?
But when it comes to totally fictionalized content
where all of these fall in relation to something else. So if I was gonna say somebody who had never gone extreme with their temptations in any other thing in the past where I would put LCON content with them, it would be at a dramatically lower level of immorality than, , a prostitute.
Or, , I’d even say than potentially OnlyFans, because, eh, that’s having an impact on a [00:47:00] real person’s life, , whereas yours has the potential, and likely very low potential given your past, possibility of impact of having another person’s life. So it’s important just to take all of this in context with the negativity of something like this coming from the multiplied probability of, in your case, what it has on somebody else, and then that somebody else’s negative context
Speaker 26: Finally here, I’d note categories that regardless of a person’s, , susceptibility to temptation that almost never lead people to temptation. An example here would be something like, oh, what falls into this category? Oviposition, I guess. , This is being aroused by putting eggs in someone.
As far as I’m aware of, no one has ever actually been seriously, like, done this in a criminal way or in a way that has made somebody else infertile compared to something like putting hamsters [00:48:00] in someone, which apparently has tempted a lot of people. People are like, “Oh, that’s not a real thing,” and then you can look up, like, actual reports from hospitals of it happening, and they’re like, “Well, I mean, I guess it happens.”
It’s like, bro, there’s multiple hospital reports about this. This is a real thing
Malcolm Collins: but anyway.
Simone Collins: Well, I think we’ve- The- ... we’ve given people a lot to think about and I, I hope
Malcolm Collins: that they- The no, hold on. I’m gonna d- talk about a final one, which is murder. Ooh. Murder. Is all murder equally bad?
Simone Collins: Wow ...
Malcolm Collins: so here, if you believe... A- and for people who say life begins at conception, I think they intuitively, even if they believe this, I don’t know any of them who if told there’s a six-year-old child in this room, and there’s 10 just fertilized blastocysts in this room in cold storage, right?
You can either unplug the blastocysts in this room or unplug something in this room that painlessly kills the six-year-old child. I don’t think anyb- anybody, any Catholic is going to choose the [00:49:00] 10 blastocysts over the six-year-old child. Because I think we all intuit even if those are 100% human lives, it’s not the same thing as a 10...
A six-year-old or a 10-year-old, right? Like, and we need to investigate morally where does this intuition come from. And i- and it’s an intuition that I think feels incredibly strong for people, right? One is, and I think the, the first thing that, that people go is, is they’re like, “Yeah, but realistically, for me to turn those six blastocysts into a six-year-old kid with all of the emotions, experiences, connected lives that that kid has, and potentiality that kid has, requires a willing woman,” right?
Right now with the technology we have. Now, this is why I think we have a huge mandate to develop artificial wombs, but with the technology we have, there is some intermittent step which makes the blastocysts more morally equivalent to [00:50:00] 10 people on life support who have a doctor’s diagnosis of 10 days left to live, but if you spent a billion dollars, you might be able to save them, or one healthy six-year-old, right?
I think that that’s the moral equation that they’re doing in their heads. But now, now we have a moral equation here where we can say, “Oh, the life of somebody who’s about to die and on life support does not have the same value as the life of a healthy child,” right? Because the potential future of that life without external intervention of a type that you cannot afford to do yourself, is significantly lower.
And now this leads us to the second thing, which is this says, okay, now you get to choose between lives. The life of a six-year-old versus the life of a baby versus the life of a 70-year-old, okay? [00:51:00] Now, if anybody is, you know, you can, you can put $10 million down and save one of these lives, and you don’t have more money than that Or increase the probability of saving one of these lives.
The moral intuition that comes out of this I actually think is quite different than what most people would assume. I think a lot of people are gonna assume, well, baby first, then six-year-old, then elderly person, if you’re just doing a str- a straight utilitarian calculation. But the reality of mor- moral intuition is that I actually think the calculation is m- very obvious in most people’s minds.
It’s 10-year-old first, then baby, then elderly person. And the question can be, why do you put the baby below the 10-year-old, right? And the answer is, is because outside of the fact that it’s a sickly baby and probably gonna get sick again, but there are a lot of things that could randomly end up ending that baby’s life and that makes it reliant on another [00:52:00] person before it becomes that 10-year-old ready to jump off and make all of the potential impacts that they’re about to make on the world that make the baby’s life, like not, not much worse to save.
I, I’d say like 2 to 3% worse, but some degree less than the, the, Also, the, the, the 10-year-old has an awareness of what’s happening to them that the baby doesn’t have that I think makes it more horrifying, their death. But this is just my moral intuition. Again, you can take your moral intuitions differently.
And the people who wanna say everybody’s life has the same value I mean, I don’t think God thinks that, right? Like, he killed random babies all the time and like, you know, when he was killing the, the Egyptians’ firstborn sons, or when he told us to, to kill all the Amalekites or the Midianites or whatever, the, the few times when he told us to kill everyone.
And even punished Saul for not doing it. So you can’t say, “Oh, it was just the way war was done at that time.” No, that was an active decision on God. Any thoughts you have on the, the value of a life, Simone? [00:53:00] I,
Simone Collins: I think I’m with you in looking at both viability and potential impact. Because if, you know, like, I think a lot of people And I know it’s different for everyone, but what, what our objective function is, and you have to consider your objective function when making a moral calculation.
Our objective function is maximizing long-term human flourishing. And that involves focusing on, on, on saving lives that aren’t necessarily going to terminate early anyway and, and involve a lot of suffering, right? That’s, that’s not gonna contribute as much as saving a life that is more likely to live long and make the biggest impact.
Yeah. I hear you. So
Malcolm Collins: this is where,
Simone Collins: Though I think that you, that you also just don’t like babies as much as I do, so it’s- Yeah ... it’s easier for you to say that. Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: it, it, it would... I mean, indulgently you’d want to [00:54:00] save the baby, but I think, like, logically... Now this is where it gets i- in terms of human individual lives, is every individual life equally worth saving if it cost the same amount of money?
Speaker 27: I would note here in the context of the Bible, it was important to teach people things because this was not a widely understood concept before the time of Christianity. Like, don’t discriminate against a poor person versus a rich \, person. Don’t judge somebody solely off of wealth. But now society has moved too far in the opposite direction, , where we do not fully grok that some people are doing more to see God’s vision come to a reality or see what needs to happen for humanity come to reality, and other people may live lives that are purely parasitic on the system, and that we act blindly to this, and that we need to begin to, , recognize that while both of their lives may have [00:55:00] dignity, they are not equal in value in terms of if you can only save one, if you can only...
You know, you, in, in some sort of broad, vague sense, they may be equal in value, but in terms of, like, practical, I have to do something to save one, they’re very obviously not because of the long-term effects they’re going to have on other people’s lives. , And, and note here, this could be a person who’s super wealthy like the, , CEO of, , UnitedHealthcare, and their life is a negative externality, literally lower in value than, , somebody who is purely a parasite on the system.
,
Speaker 27: Or more salient modern example, Bricks and Minifigs CEO
So this isn’t like wealthy people’s lives are more valued than less wealthy people’s lives. It’s what you do with that life
Malcolm Collins: And here we’ll say a random unemployed Somalian versus Elon Musk. Now, did you know that now he’s worth the next, I think, five richest persons’ net worth combined?
Simone Collins: Yeah, in, like, certain countries he’s, he’s- ... like, [00:56:00] worth more than them. Surely there’s gonna be a more democratic way- But isn’t he, isn’t he, like, worth more than Canada or something?
Or like their GDP. I, I, I can’t remember. But yeah, it’s some- something insane. But I mean, so this, this is something that even came up with COVID, right? Because when vaccines were in short supply, the question came, like, “Well, what lives are we going to
Malcolm Collins: save?” Well, and the, and the Democratic establishment at the time, like their White House at the time suggested that it be given to those who’ve been racially disenfranch- basically give it to Black and
Simone Collins: Hispanic- Well, so it, it’s clear that people do make, at first...
Like I, I keep trying to explain to our kids there’s no such thing as fair. Because you, you have to establish, like well then what is, on what basis, you know, are you dividing a resource? And that depends on your values, and people have different values. And I think that’s the core thing. Mm. Is there is no universal like good or bad thing, or worse or better sin.
It really d- it’s all based on how you orient toward your
Malcolm Collins: objective function when it comes- But this, this is where when it comes to the value of a life, the value of Elon’s life is demonstrably- Mm ... more than the random Simoleon in this example, right? The, the reason I bring this up is his pursuit-
Simone Collins: Well, that [00:57:00] depends.
I mean, for like people who, who devalue capitalists and who value non-capitalists, he doesn’t.
Malcolm Collins: Right. But I’m talking about what we think is objectively true about reality. Mm. That our goal in life, any human’s goal in life is to move humanity forwards, right? To, to move human flourishing forward.
Simone Collins: Whoa.
That’s, that’s our goal, but I don’t get the impression that’s a universal goal.
Malcolm Collins: Right. But- A
Simone Collins: lot of people’s goals are
Malcolm Collins: very
Simone Collins: different ...
Malcolm Collins: this is a track. This is about what’s religiously
Simone Collins: true. Oh, yeah. Okay, yes, yes. For us, yes.
Malcolm Collins: So you can say for them, whatever. I don’t f-ing care what they think. Yeah, okay, okay.
They can go in the blender for all I care. I
Simone Collins: didn’t know we were talking about just our view.
Malcolm Collins: In our worldview, and I believe the worldview of the majority of our fans, the prospective impact of Elon going forwards is enormous when you look at the things that he’s accomplished for the human race so far.
Broke wokeism through the acquisition of X, on top of what he’s done for the environment with Tesla, the way he’s moved forward technology with Tesla, SpaceX, X, that he’s dedicated the company’s entire mission to a [00:58:00] Mars colony, right? The like, how cool is that? And the positive externality of a Mars colony, it means even if an asteroid does come that could kill all of humanity or we get a Gray Goo scenario or we get some sort of AI foaming scenario, we get...
We have the backup. The backups matter, people.
Simone Collins: Okay, but you’re going way off the rails. Going back to murder, and I, I, I did, I... One of our listeners, at least one of our w- listeners pointed out, like, how do you reconcile thou shalt not kill with the fact that there’s a lot of killing in-
Malcolm Collins: In the Bible, yeah
Simone Collins: yeah. So how do you
Malcolm Collins: personally- Because thou shalt not kill does not translate to thou shall not kill in the Bible. It translates to thou shall not murder, which in Jewish law at the time was a very, very specific type of premeditated murder.
Simone Collins: Okay, so tell me more. Like, h- how do I know if I’m doing a, a bad per the Old Testament, per the Ten Commandments?
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, in the Old Testament we see people killing people all the time on behalf of God. [00:59:00] Yeah. It’s basically if the person is an enemy of your people, you have free range on them. That’s, that’s the general... And your people, I think, you know, we can, we can I, I would say, like, any of the saved people, any of the people of God would fall into the our people category here.
But if they are creating negative externalities for your people, the Bible’s pretty carte blanche, do what you want. No, not even what you want. You, you have a commandment to deal with the problem. Multiple times throughout the Bible.
Simone Collins: Huh. Yeah, I, I would love to learn more about this specific definition of Judaism.
Like, per Judaism you say? Uh-huh. Like, of what murder is.
Malcolm Collins: Within Judaism, the context is what’s good for the Jewish people, right? And God was very okay with this context throughout the Old Testament, okay? The idea that he doesn’t want us to... And I, and I think that this is the, the line that is twisted the most.
To translate it to thou shall not kill is just lying, ‘cause that’s not what it [01:00:00] says. And I don’t, I... Th- this is the one thing I really get annoyed with, with nux when he goes over this all the time. When we end up in a scenario where the other side is blatantly stealing elections, like, let’s suppose.
And y- and, and, and your vote doesn’t matter anymore, and you have nowhere to run anymore, and now it’s prima nocta on your daughters right? You have a mandate to fight back Right? Especially when things get tyrannical. Like, I would want our people to be one of the first when things do go full Nazi to actually fight back against that.
Real Nazi. You know, like taking away our rights that we’re seeing now, right? To live life the way you want, to breed the way you want, to have children the way you want, to engage with genetic technology the way you want. I think, you know, when these rights are infringed upon, that I think are some of the most important rights that any human can have the, the lengths to which I think we are mandated to go is extreme insofar as it [01:01:00] doesn’t bring down negative externalities on our community, which is a pretty big and so
Simone Collins: Right, because as soon as you make yourself an existential threat to another group, that group has a mandate themselves to of course take you out.
Mm-hmm. And that’s I think a, a very important calculation.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And this is where all, because Leaflet wanted to talk about this, you know, on... An individual within the techno-puritan phase has a mandate to stay armed with the highest degree of lethality armament for your level of technology, ‘cause you know, you don’t wanna get stuck like the Sikhs do with stupid knives that is practical for your context.
So for example, if you’re on a spaceship, you probably don’t want something that’s n- accidentally gonna crack through the hull of the spaceship, right? But you do still want something that is lethal. And this came from the Sikh context, right? Like anybody who looks at techno-puritanism at this point can tell [01:02:00] this is a real religion, right?
Like this is obviously like a sincerely held religion, and this tract explains our views on you know, you should not... They really say don’t just go out and, and, and kill random negative externalities in society, ‘cause that makes our community into a negative externality for other communities that don’t have these views.
So that is where it makes sense to not go out there and make a, a, a jerk of yourself. But clearly these are our real religious views. And so within any government system, I think they have to respect this if they’re respecting it for Sikhs. And I’ve, and I’ve now explained logically why we have these views and why we believe we have a mandate for self-protection, because if you go into public without self-protection, you are putting yourself and your family at risk.
And so if you are over the age 18 you have a mandate for self-protection at all times. Because it, it’s up to you to not just protect yourself, but all of the other people who could be killed or have their lives removed in any sort of negative [01:03:00] externality event like a live su- shooter situation for example.
Now you are a positive externality because you can end that.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Speaker 3: And note here, this is not me telling you this for funsies. If you take a literal interpretation of the Christian Bible, this is what we are commanded to do. So if you look at something like Luke 22:35-38: Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you without purse, bag, or sandals, did you lack for anything?”
“Nothing,” they answered. He then said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. It is written, ‘And he who was numbered with the transgressors,’ and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, that which is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.”
The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are your two swords.” “That’s enough,” he replied. So a few notes here. In the Greek, most modern interpretations take this to mean that there were only two swords among all of the disciples. , However, it doesn’t exclusively mean that in Greek. It [01:04:00] could mean they all had two swords or he alone had two swords.
, So what I take this to mean is that you don’t need to arm yourself with more than two, , lethal, , close-range, , weapons. , And the way that I would generally handle this speaking is that you need to be armed with at least one, because he does say you, you need a sword more than the cloak on your back, right?
, And that for the other, I would use something that is faster disabling, like a taser or something like that, , because that falls into... within the category of him. Back then, they wouldn’t have had something like that, so the idea , is first you arm yourself with something lethal, then you arm yourself with something quick.
, And this is if you are taking what we are going to call the
Oath of preservation, which is to say that you take responsibility of your own life to yourself, and if you allow yourself to die because you went out in public and you were killed by somebody who you should have been able to defend yourself against, but you weren’t because you did not take the oath of preservation, , that’s your responsibility
Morally speaking, that rests on your soul, [01:05:00] morally speaking
Speaker 3: in the same way an unaliving is, in the same way self-harm is, in the same way, , a skydiving accident is, , which we consider quite sinful.
and I wanna really focus on the words here so we can understand what Jesus is saying in this context. He’s basically saying, “When we were doing our preaching, when I was doing my preaching with you guys, , we were doing it in a pacifistic way, and in a way that was monastic.”
You know, where you don’t have a - coin purse, et cetera. , He’s like, “And now that we’re moving into the next era, you know, after my death,” which this is one of the last teachings he gave us. , “After my death, it will not be monastic. You are demanded to not go into the monastic lifestyle, to go out there, to be industrious, to have the coin purse.
And secondarily, to be armed, and to expect persecution, and thus be armed.” , So even if you’re looking at the, , the swords in this context and you do think, “Oh, it meant two swords for the entire group,” he’s still not even talking about this context. He’s talking about [01:06:00] the context for after he’s dead, where everyone is expected to always be armed at all times. And note here, some people will then say, “
Didn’t Jesus say something like, “Live by the sword, die by the sword,” as an abnomation of armed conflict?
Speaker 3: , And if you hear-- would then say something like, “Well, what about, you know, when, ...”
Jesus says in Matthew when one of his companions takes a sword and chops the ear off of somebody who’s trying to arrest Jesus,, “For all of those who draw the sword will die by the sword. , Do you not think you can call on my Father, and he will put at disposal more than 12 legions of angels? But how then would the scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?”
, So note here, he’s not saying broadly. He’s, he’s very explicitly not saying in a general context all who live by the sword die by the sword. He’s saying all who live by the sword in opposition to God’s plan, and right now he’s saying it is God’s plan that I am supposed to die in just the near future.
, And, You, you also see this because the same scene is recorded in, in John [01:07:00] 18:10. , “Put your sword away. Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me?” , So the reason he says to not use a sword in this context is because, , he is trying to fulfill a prophecy here, and he’s beginning to interfere with the prophecy.
, So his previous commandment, which one of his last, that you are supposed to be armed at all times, and if you don’t have a sword, you should have... And keep in mind, sword in context changes, , in modern context. We are all, not just techno-puritans, all Christians supposed to always be armed Because we have responsibility for our lives and the lives of those around us.
And note here, this, this is not a particularly weird thing for Jews in this time period. Almost all Jews were armed most of the time
This is why when they were like, here are two swords, Jesus, is that enough? I don’t think they meant for all of them together, as that would have been an absurdly low number of swords for Jews to have during that time period. It seems much more likely they mean, is two swords enough now that you’re telling me that I need swords?
That, in context, [01:08:00] appears a much more likely, even if it’s not what the mainstream Christian denominations want you to understand and will fight against, interpretation of what’s being said here in a literalist context.
So here you can see something like Nehemiah 4:16-18. , “The officers posted themselves behind all the people of Judea who were building the wall. Those who carried materials did their work with one hand and held a weapon in the other, and each of the builders wore his sword on the side as he worked.” , Nehemiah 4:14, “Don’t be afraid of them.
Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your brothers and sons and daughters, your wives, your home.” , Basically talking about arming oneself as being a duty within the community and it being normal within the community. In Samuel 25:13, “David said to his men, ‘Each of you strap on your sword.’
So each of them strapped on his sword, and David strapped on his as well,” implying that all the men had swords ready to strap on. , In Psalms 14:4-1, “Praise be to the Lord my rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers [01:09:00] for battle.” , Again, showing that the Lord does want war. He does want battle. That is part of what is expected of us when we are faced with evil.
Speaker 28: also have Nehemiah 4:13. They stationed arms by families with swords and spears and bows.
We have
Speaker 29: Psalms.
Speaker 28: 14:41, “Praise be to the Lord my mo- rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.”
Speaker 29: . Basically, it’s all over the Bible. Wherever you look at the Old Testament, , people are expected to fight for their own people
Speaker 4: So officially, how does this work within techno puritanism? , There are two potential oaths that you can take, the oath of self-preservation, which is taking responsibility for your life and the lives of those around you, And the secondary oath of self-preservation, which is a more maximal form of this.
Once you have taken one of these oaths, going forwards, you are expected to undergo what is mandated by that oath. After the first oath of self-preservation in any context where you might encounter [01:10:00] somebody who is also armed with a lethal weapon, it is upon you or your responsibility to also be armed with a lethal weapon.
, This means that if in a context like, say, a plane flight or something like that, actually there is no chance that even a Sikh is gonna be on that plane with a lethal weapon, you don’t have to have a le-lethal weapon. But if you’re just, like, walking around town, absolutely you have to have a lethal weapon on you.’
, So it has one small caveat, which is if one of the types of places where no one can have a lethal weapon is in your way of a secondary location where some people might have a lethal weapon, but you will be in for a short period of time, you are not mandated to have a lethal weapon.
So this would mean if you have taken the oaths , of preservation, , and you are going on a vacation somewhere, you don’t need to then buy a sword when you get to that location if you were not able to carry yours in your luggage, right? , So this is the first oath of preservation. The secondary oath of preservation is to take this more [01:11:00] maximally because, , frankly, just a lethal weapon, , which implies generally a short-range weapon, is not going to be everything you need to protect yourself from most of the dangers of this world.
And so the secondary oath of self-preservation is more maximalist and says... While the first one says you can have up to two, ,, the second one says you are mandated to have a short-range lethal or disabling weapon and a long-range lethal weapon, , with the long-range one being lethal.
So this would mandate both, , something short-range and something long-ranged. And generally, you would take the first oath about six months to a year before you take the second oath. , While it is generally advised that most techno-puritans take the first oath at around the age of eighteen going forwards.
It is not a mandate to be a follower of our religion
And it is not advised if you are in an environment where it may prevent you from
Speaker 4: doing business or [01:12:00] advocating the interests of our people more broadly, , because it could within certain cultural contexts. , And , the secondary oath is only for people who want to maximally dedicate themselves to this and requires regular training in whatever that long-range weapon is
Speaker 15: Final note on this oath is, and you are responsible for recognizing this in yourself or having this imposed on you by your community, but if you ever reach a state of mind where you are now a danger to those around you or you are too aggressive in the way you might use something like this, ,
It, it is a moral necessity for you to either for that period not be armed, , or period, period not be armed for the rest of your life. So if you have something like dementia, you would not be armed during that period. If you are drinking, , heavily, you would have a mandate to not be armed during that period or on any sort of mind-altering chemical
Malcolm Collins: And never, as [01:13:00] a techno-puritan, broadly speaking never do like a, a mass shooting or something like that. There is just no point to it. It doesn’t achieve our ends. There, there are ways that lethality can be handled that do not hurt innocent individuals.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Speaker 12: Basically, we just expect you to be dramatically more cunning as a techno-puritan than the type of people who would do something so witless. You know, if you want to mass effect action, use a gene drive or something like that.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And, and this means to be demonstrably sure of the guilt of an individual even in scenarios like say somebody is out there saying, you know, “My group needs to go out and murder people.” Like they’re, even if they’re not doing it themselves, they’re out preaching this every day. Like murder innocent people, grape children, something like that.
If this is being preached do you have a moral license to do something about this? Absolutely within this faith system. But, but this is only if, if what they are [01:14:00] preaching is manifold worse and being acted upon by people. If they’re like a crazy person on the street, that’s doesn’t matter. If you’re in an environment where people are being killed regularly I think that we have a moral mandate to intervene in this so yeah, that’s a, a, a broader understanding of, of morality, sinfulness, where to engage with stuff.
The final thing I wanted to note here, which comes downstream of one of the questions somebody had on the, the stream about, like, the actual ruling in this on techno-paganism, if you’re a follower Is what is the ruling on techno-puritanism around if you feel that you are able to develop more emotional control long stream by emotionally venting in the short term?
Now first I would note here, I think the research demonstrably shows that it- you lose self-control the more you indulge in it. If y- if you feel that you have a better ability to deal with your grief by crying and letting it out, and this is something that you’ve experienced [01:15:00] and you know yourself, sure.
But know you’re in dangerous territory if you’re doing that. Because for most of us, what happens is the things that make us sad in life are the things where, Like I didn’t really feel that sad when my mom died because I knew I had done everything I could to be a good son to her and to give her a good life within reason throughout her entire life.
I’d always been there for her, and so I was like, “I don’t really have any regrets on any interaction I’ve had with her. I have regrets that she won’t be able to see my kids, but like, that’s not something that I have control over, so there’s no reason to feel sad about this.” But there have been times when I have done things that I feel deep regret about, and there is this emotion that you feel.
Like if you feel grief in that moment, if you cry, if you blame yourself, if you hit something, the responsibility, your self-responsibility, your anger at yourself can deservedly be lesser. And I think we all sort of feel this voice in our heads. And what I’m [01:16:00] talking about is not giving into that voice, because that voice is lying to you.
It doesn’t lower your culpability. Instead what you should do is instead of giving into that voice saying, “No, I need to learn from this. Okay, I wasn’t there for my mom as much as I needed to be. Is my dad still alive? Is anyone else in my life still alive? Are, are my family members that are estranged still alive that I should reconnect with?”
It should flip a switch for you in regards to all of that. The final thing is I’ll note that this entire ethical subset that we’ve discussed here also applies to interpersonal relationships. If an interpersonal relationship is purely masturbatory, you get nothing from it, it doesn’t enrich you, it doesn’t help you understand the world better.
Like when I talk with Leaflet, I often come away with entirely new framings of society. So true. A great one she gave that I’m gonna put it in the track here because it’s gotta go on a track somewhere, is I was talking about as humans genetically engineer themselves, we’re likely gonna [01:17:00] see different groups with different preferences begin to look very differently, where you might see techno-puritans end up looking like space marines one day, right?
Like giant super intelligent, super, you know, two hearts, everything like that. Adonis type figures. You might see another group, like let’s say Jews spec- ... spec into like a high agility build. And no, this isn’t a commandment for techno-pyrogenethums. You guys need to find out what works, what’s, what’s the correct build to spec into.
Spec into an agility build. You know, they become the cat people of the far future or something like this. And I was talking about how this makes diversity even more valuable when you have a real groups with differential strengths. And what Leaflet said is she goes, “Look, if this is confusing to you, think about this.”
You’re putting together your space boarding party. This is like, you know, y- your crew for a spaceship. This is like you putting together- ... your adventuring guild, right? You, you want, you know, yeah, your Orkan warrior and your, you know, dwarven workshop guy, and your [01:18:00] elven mage, and your, you know, y- you, you want all of the different builds in there, right?
That is how you build the best party. You would be stupid to make your entire party, you know, human or dwarf. Or y- you, you can do it for some sort of novelty reason, but we genuinely benefit from working alongside other groups. Even if the dwarves and the elves sometimes screw each other over, a party’s still better off having a dwarf and an elf in it.
And I think that that’s an important thing to think about. But the reason I was saying that this matters with friendships is I think we all know that there are friendships that we engage in in our lives, or relationships we engage in, that do nothing but drain from us. Those are directly sinful to have, and if you’re afraid that you’re a bad person for abandoning this person because oh, well, if you weren’t there for them, who would be?
If you don’t have a moral mandate to that individual, like they’re a parent of yours or something and even then this is tentative, if they are draining resources that could otherwise be going to the next [01:19:00] generation cut ‘em off. This also goes for parents. A parent who is draining resources that should be going to the next generation and isn’t contributing, cut ‘em off.
Because the next generation, the younger generation matters more than the older generation. And, and, and cut ‘em off can mean pull the plug. And this is also true of ourselves if we ever become drains to our families.
Simone Collins: Yeah, we hold to that.
Malcolm Collins: Anyway. If you’re gonna be like, “Oh, God says all life has value,” then why did he tell people to randomly kill people sometimes?
Why did he tell you to, to, to... Why did he punish Saul? It’s because that’s clearly not what God wants. God wants what’s best for society. That’s why he has guided, and the groups that have followed him have always lived- ... the, in the most flourishing of societies, the most prosperous of societies. Because that’s the downstream effect.
That’s why all the sins that we get as Christians generally make your life better. But they need to also generally make society better, and so we’re extrapolating from that. Anyway, thoughts, Simone?
Simone Collins: I probably agree. Yes. [01:20:00] Yeah. And I think it’s important al- to, also to note that a lot of the more, le- less sinful things you’ve pointed out would be seen as very sinful things to do per today’s standards, and just going with what feels socially comfortable is not necessarily
Malcolm Collins: the right thing. Yeah. And note here when it comes to weapons, you also have a duty to secure them, a, a religious duty to secure them, because an unsecured weapon can end a child’s life at any moment.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, and that’s most gun deaths in America, right? It’s tragic, so yeah. Any, anyway, it
Malcolm Collins: also- But even if you, even if you hate our religion, if you want the right to carry a weapon, techno-puritanism is the way to go.
Speaker 9: And note, in terms of what the weapons look like, you can go in generally a few directions for the traditional weapons. One is to go with something that represents your ancestral group or that has ancestral ties to the Technopuritan tradition. Since we personally take [01:21:00] a lot from our own Scottish ancestry and we lean a lot into Roman ancestry, that could be a dirk or a gladius.
Or something that is inconspicuous if you think that that is the most efficient, like a belt buckle knife or something like that. It really depends on, one, your own heritage and identity and how you wish to honor that, and two, what works within your existing social context. With the understanding also always being that if everyone else is banned from having a weapon, then there’s no risk of you being killed in that situation or needing to protect someone, so you also don’t need a weapon.
But if any other religious group is allowed a weapon, because Jesus told us that we have to do this, and I know a lot of other Christian groups and denominations have pussied out of this in one way or another, but we are not them. And more is expected of us in terms of protecting ourselves and our communities than most of them expect from themselves.
Most of them live incredibly indolent, self-centered, [01:22:00] and efficaciousless lives. Why should we part our moral standards to theirs?
Simone Collins: There you go. Love it. All right, well, I will go start your dinner, and I love you very much.
Malcolm Collins: Aw, thank you so much. I really appreciate it. Good tract, I think.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Interesting stuff, and I, yeah, sins are under-discussed, so I’m glad we’re going back into them.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Love you. Bye.
Simone Collins: Recording. We are here. We are back. It is happening.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, people, people like the medieval shirt on the leaflet call, so I decided I... It was okay to wear it on our-
Simone Collins: It’s good. It’s good. It’s, Mm ... the stuff that really signals BDSM is leather straps.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that’s what I
Simone Collins: was worried it appeared it looked- They ruin leather straps.
Yes, I mean- That’s why we didn’t buy anything with leather straps, yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: instead of [01:23:00] medieval. ‘Cause what I’m going for is Ren Fair man, because everybody says I make my wife dress like she’s from the past, so why don’t I dress like I’m from the past? And I go, “I don’t make my wife dress that way,” but, you
Simone Collins: know.
I chose this outfit. This is not, like, something you made me... I was like, I showed up one day wearing this stuff, and Malcolm’s like, “Well, okay.”
Malcolm Collins: Okay. I guess this is what we’re doing. All right. What are we doing for dinner tonight, by the way?
Simone Collins: I’m gonna make some kind of pasta dish for the kids. It might be macaroni and cheese.
It might not. I don’t know. Is it gonna have, like,
Malcolm Collins: a meat sauce or a... What, what type of sauce?
Simone Collins: I... Probably a macaroni and cheese sauce or possibly just Parmesan cheese. Okay. I, I don’t know yet. It sort of depends on what the kids want, what mood they’re in. I’m okay with mac
Malcolm Collins: and cheese tonight
Simone Collins: if- Mac and cheese?
Malcolm Collins: if you’re doing that, yeah.
Simone Collins: It suits their, their cheesy fancy. It might suit your cheesy fancy, too.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, no. I can do a reheated potato tonight.
Simone Collins: Yeah, you can with cheddar? Do a reheated
Malcolm Collins: potato with cheese.
Simone Collins: Okay. Cheesu. [01:24:00] Like cheddar, right? Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and then some of those meat patty things, the pork ones. Yeah,
Simone Collins: bon cha, or whatever they’re called.
I don’t know.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. Pork bon cha. They’re really good. They go really well with cheesy baked potato, I’ll tell you what.
Simone Collins: That makes a lot of sense. With some pepper on it, yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: And this time I’m gonna try to make, what, slices and just air fry them and see what happens.
Malcolm Collins: Let’s try it.
Simone Collins: What could possibly go wrong?
It better be better, because it’s gonna get crispier when you air fry it. In theory. We don’t know. If it’s an already baked potato, it might be pretty much like... Potatoes are very strange in, like, w- the starch doing things that I don’t understand, ‘cause I don’t know potato science. I’m not a potato scientist.
Speaker 30: Let’s unpack everything right here, okay? All right. Yeah. W- now let’s get this mask out right here. I get this out right here. You can’t wait to start using them, huh? Yeah, I just can’t wait.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Kirsche joins Based Camp for an in-depth conversation on her journey from TERA PvP gamer to one of the most influential conservative VTubers. She discusses surviving a major cancellation attempt by Vice, her deep research exposing “Bridge” (the successor to DEI initiatives), why boycotts alone aren’t enough, and how the VTuber community helped turn the cultural tide.
Malcolm and Simone Collins dive into tactics for defeating woke capture in gaming and corporations, the power of parallel institutions, AI tools for creators, building alternative economies, and why nerdy weirdos are winning the culture war. Topics include abortion radicalization stories, pronatalism, free speech, and practical ways conservatives can create better systems.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: it Hello, everyone. I am so excited to be here with you today. Today, we actually are doing a collab with Kirsche, which is so exciting, ‘cause I’ve wanted to do this one forever. It’s like everything’s coming in at once. And the context on Kirsche, if you are not familiar with who she is or her cultural relevance, because it’s m- hugely outsized, I think.
My entire life within nerdy cultural niches, we had the wokes and the proto-wokes come in, whether it was video games, whether it was, you know, cons, whether it was trading cards, whether it was y- you know, anime. They’d come in, and they would screw it all up, and they would take it over, and they’d push us out.
And every time it happened, it just felt like th- there was this endless tide, and it was gonna forever happen to everything I ever had an interest in. And then one fateful day, a sort of the [00:01:00] last wave, this happened in the VTuber community. And it happened specifically targeted at Kirsche. And when this happened, we did a number of videos on it.
And Kirsche, unlike every other person before her, h- held her ground and held it in a way where they actually holistically retreated. And they retreated to such an extent that post this, a conservative VTuber scene has begun to grow. And I mean, it was there beforehand, but now it feels much livelier and much more like a core part of the wider conservative movement, and it’s been beginning to regain crowd.
So, like, after your attempted cancellation, you then had the guy who tried to do this to the horror space in, in favor of shadows. I don’t know if you remember this whole controversy. I do. But he tried to claim the horror space, and he got absolutely eviscerated immediately. Yes. Absolutely thrown out i- i- immediately.[00:02:00]
And so her being in this, it felt very much like
Speaker: And then we’ll know how to beat them. One day it will all be over, and everyone will forget that this was the moment. This is when it turned. And it wasn’t the mighty
Daily Wire
Speaker: , it wasn’t
Some fancy
Heritage Foundation report
Speaker: There’s a
Speaker 4: Vtuber
Speaker: named
Speaker 4: Kirsche
Speaker: Do
Speaker 2: now! Yeah.
Good job,
Speaker 4: Reporter.
Speaker 3: Thank you, sir. That would be
Speaker 4: fox girl
Speaker 3: , sir.
Speaker 2: Carry on, .
Speaker: Yes, sir.
Malcolm Collins: or,
Malcolm Collins: But, but after this point while... And, and this is something w- I, I wanna talk about. While culturally we seem to be winning more, like, our ability to do something like boycott Harley Davidson or [00:03:00] Tractor Supply...
By the way, they’re super woke, Simone. I don’t know if you know this. Oh, yeah. To the extent that they’ve actually changed their policies has not been effective. But in the spaces we’ve been closer to, like the video game space, like the Ubisoft boycotts basically we learned we have to put these companies out of business.
Mm-hmm. And so I wanna talk with you about that experience, like you getting into this space before the, the big cancellation attempt How you thought about and managed that and how the culture has changed post that
Kirsche: All right. Okay. So I guess the starting point is, like, how, how did I feel during the cancellation?
No,
Malcolm Collins: no, how’d you get into VTub- Like, when you got into VTubing, did you intend to be a political Vtuber?
Kirsche: No, not really. I mean, I first got into VTubing back in, like, 2018, and I w- I wasn’t even, like, a Vtuber proper then. I was just, like, a PNGTuber. I or- originally started, like, without even a microphone.
Like, two weeks of streaming, [00:04:00] no microphone, no nothing ‘cause I had just quit my job at an insurance company after an elongated period of my anxiety being incredibly bad. And so at this point in time I was hopped up on, like, three different anxiety medications and I was just like, “Well, I don’t wanna just sit around and do nothing all day.
I feel like I should at least try to do something that could help my anxiety get better.” Well, my name is pretty well-known in the Tera community, so if I started streaming I would already have, like, a small audience of people who would be there, and then I could use that as, like, I’m gonna interact with people more frequently.
I’m gonna, you know, get a bit out of my safe bubble of, like, I only wanna do text communications. And so, like, eventually, you know, obviously I started using my microphone. I got a PNG. So, so basically- I d- got a, like, animated GIF
Malcolm Collins: How did you know the Tera community? What, what, w- w- what was your, your experience there?
Kirsche: I was one of the best PVPers on the server for many, many years. I was frequently rank one on the rank board whenever like, Fraywin Canyon would have its, like, [00:05:00] rollovers. I didn’t do threes as often, but I absolutely loved Fraywin Canyon and I loved doing like, guild PVP and whatnot. Like, it, it was really weird, like, coming into a streamer scene and seeing people like Lakari, who I had healed for, like, years before, already being huge streamers, right?
I was just like, “What the heck?” Zenosas Vex, I, I played with him in, like, Final Fantasy XIV raiding as well. So, like, to see all these people who, like, had been in, like, raid groups or PVP groups before in different games with me, I was like, “Oh. I was streaming. Streaming’s got pretty robust, is it not?”
So it
Malcolm Collins: was like a- ‘Cause, like,
Kirsche: previously I never paid attention to it ... social thing.
Malcolm Collins: It, it was like an alternative to what people used to do. Like, I’m, I’m gonna get out there and, and build a social life. It was like-
Kirsche: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: that... Okay, so that’s fascinating. Okay, so now describe how you go from there to, like, what radicali- what, what got you on the I’m actually gonna start talking, because we didn’t start talking about politics either.
We, we had no interest in that to start. A- in fact, we started with pretty progressive political beliefs, Ooh ... getting into the space and everything. So what w- what hap- [00:06:00] was it that you were a conservative during this time or you had conservative-like beliefs, or were these beliefs that you developed over time in the space, or you just felt more comfortable talking about over time?
Kirsche: I would say I was probably already on the conservative path at this point. For the 2016 election I had been registered independent basically since I could register to vote, and for the 2016 election I changed my registration from independent to Republican so that I could vote for Trump in the primary And I, I guess I had been talking about, like, the nonsense with transgender targeting children probably since about 2011, 2012 or so.
Oh, that was impossible back then. Like, just in my personal life. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that was like- And I- ... you’d get canceled, fired for talking about that- Yeah ... like, 2011.
Kirsche: Yeah. And, and I, I’d post about it, like, on my Facebook, you know, which I didn’t have many p- friends on Facebook, ‘cause I’m not a huge social media person.
So I would just, like, post about it occasionally there. And so when I started streaming when my friend who would come and voice chat with me, my [00:07:00] old head moderator, Tangerine, he he would get our groups together. So he would either put us in Duty Finder and we would wait for ages, or he would, like, put it up in an LFG and we’d get other human beings.
While he was doing that, I would just read articles on stream. And so sometimes I would get through, like, a paragraph. Sometimes I’d get through, like, half of it. Sometimes I would have enough time to finish it. But it was like I would read that in between, like, waiting for dungeons because I just, I enjoyed reading the news in my off time.
Mm-hmm. And I didn’t have anybody in, like, real life to talk about the news with because they were all, like, either apolitical or like, “Yeah, I just don’t care. I just... It doesn’t matter to me.” So it was nice to like, you know, talk to this few people in my audience then who were also interested, like, in what was going on politically in America.
And it kind of shifted once a lot more of, I guess, leftist policy kind of stuff started being her- heralded in the VTuber community as apolitical. And so it’s like you could see all of the leftist rot coming in like it did to comics, like it did to video games- Yeah ... like it did to other things, and everyone being like, [00:08:00] “Well, that’s not political, but Kirsche is political.”
And it’s like, you know what? Let’s talk politics even more now because I don’t want what happened to all of my other favorite things to happen to VTubing.
Malcolm Collins: That’s fascinating. So, one story I’ve heard from some other VTubers we’ve talked to about this is there was like, there was a big shift after the release of the Harry Potter game.
Mm-hmm. Because a bunch of people hadn’t realized how captured the space had become-
Kirsche: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: until they just tried to stream what they thought of as a fairly innocuous game. But it sounds like you broke the seal even before that based on, and I think a lot of people don’t realize this about a part of American culture because I, because I talk about this with, with very specific groups often, where I’m like, when you are calling out a group for something that feels very justified to you and then they start yelling at you saying, “Oh, that’s, you know, anti-Mormon or anti-Jewish or anti,” you know, whatever.
And I’m like, no, this is like a reasonable thing. I think a lot of just like a culturally American thing to do is to double down on it. Be like, you [00:09:00] can’t police me for something that’s a perfectly reasonable thing to say. I’m gonna double down because you attempted to do that. And that’s sort of what drove you into this.
Kirsche: Yeah. And, and it’s like, and people, people like to be like VTuber purists, and I think that’s fine, where they’re just like VTubers will only play games, they’ll only do like cute girl doing cute things, like idle activities. And I think it’s fine to be a VTubing purist. Obviously, I’m very much outside of the typical idle culture since I do talk politics.
Yeah. And it’s like I feel like once, once we start making more gains and we stop having like the colonization of our spaces, then I can kind of finally be like, okay, I still enjoy talking politics, but I can actually go back to playing more games like I used to instead of having to talk about politics all the time
Malcolm Collins: Well, you do a very good job, and for people who haven’t watched her stuff, I often describe her as the top of the funnel for our sort of intellectual ecosystem.
Which is to say you often do the original research, which then drips out of all the various taps [00:10:00] who watch all of whatever’s trending right now. ?
Speaker 5: Federal scientists are working around the clock to probe its secrets. Once we understand the bug, we will defeat
it
Malcolm Collins: When did you begin to get into the deep research? ‘Cause that must take a ton of time ...
Kirsche: for the Bridge stuff specifically, man, I, I don’t have a ton of time to watch content creators like I used to, just ‘cause I’m a creator myself now.
Yeah But I used to watch a ton of videos and stuff from, like, ItsAGundam and Tim Pool and The Quartering. Yeah. And I originally even started watching Tim Pool way back in the day because he was, he was, like, firmly on the left. And I was like- Yeah ... this is a guy that, like, has some things in common with me, but I disagree with a lot of other things.
Let’s watch him, because that’s a great way to expose myself to, you know, the other side of ideas, and sort of solidify how I feel based on his arguments, you know? So it was, it was really nice. And then over time, obviously, he became more center and left a lot [00:11:00] of the left-leaning stuff behind. But The Quartering had made a video, and he had a sponsor, and I can’t even remember what the sponsor was for, but it basically, like, told you how woke a, a, a company was-
by using it. So you could, like, scan an item and it would give you, like, a woke score for the company. And they were like, “Here’s the top 10 most woke companies of, like, 2023,” I think it was or something. And Campbell’s was in there, and I was like, “The soup company? I like their soup. I li- I like their chicken pot pie pub style soup.
That’s good.” And I hadn’t, I’d never heard of anything about Campbell’s, even in all of my, like, going through other basic DEI stuff. Yeah,
Simone Collins: yeah.
Kirsche: And I, I looked them up, and one of the first things I found was that Campbell’s was spearhead funding a project called Bridge. And I was like, “Oh. Well, what’s Bridge?”
And I found out that there are, like, two different Bridges. There’s one set up by Social Impact, and then there’s the one that I’ve been digging into by Sharyl Attkisson. And I thought at first when I first found them that they had something to do with each other, because Social Impact was [00:12:00] called, like, Bridge Project 2.0, and Sharyl Attkisson had referred to her project as, like, a, a 2.0 of DEI before.
So I was like, “Maybe,” but I couldn’t find any solid connections between those two specifically.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Kirsche: But going through Sharyl Attkisson’s was like- Wow. And I, I literally could only contribute or attribute it to having watched that, the quartering video. If I’d never watched that, I would have never looked into Campbell’s.
Simone Collins: Wait, what, what does, what does Bridge do? I’m out of the loop.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Simone, Simone’s not in this, this conspiracy also. I didn’t
Simone Collins: know.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So John, shock her in our audience.
Simone Collins: Please.
Kirsche: So a lot of people when I try bringing up Bridge, they’re just like, “Oh, this is just another renaming of DEI, like Jedi or whatever.”
And it’s like, well, no, it’s not. Bridge is a company that is working with tons of other very, very strong, huge corporations. And they have a ton of these corporations who are signed on to like their board of directors or their other like actual, like willing to be publicly associated with Bridge page.
Simone Collins: Huh.
Kirsche: But a lot of companies who aren’t even on Bridge, they follow the [00:13:00] same exact trajectory of hiding the DEI. And there was an interview with a, a lady who runs a podcast called like DEI After Five, and she was talking to another DEI acolyte saying that a lot of people don’t realize how good DEI is for them.
And so you have to hide the DEI vegetables- Oh my God ... in order to get people to eat them to realize that they’re good for them. It’s like the entire purpose for like for years before we started seeing it, Bridge was informing companies on how to obscure DEI, how to make it less public. The entire point of having like a DEI team after 2020 was to obviously showcase like, “Hey, we’re woke.
We’re doing the Marxist thing.”
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Kirsche: Bridge comes in and says, “This is gonna be a problem. You need to dissolve those DEI teams, and you need to embed those DEI acolytes in other parts of the company.” Whoa. Because if people see the like DEI outright, that’s gonna be an attackable vector. That’s gonna be a way to get yourself in legal trouble for discrimination.
100%.
Simone Collins: Oh,
Kirsche: whoa.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. Whoa. Like [00:14:00] first, so there’s this implicit recognition that it is discrimination, and it is gonna get caught, and it is gonna get stopped, but then that’s so interesting ‘cause I listen to still so many leftist outlets. And of course- Mm-hmm ... there’s always the, I mean, just as there were accusations of greenwashing when environmentalism was at its zenith, then there’s the accusations
Malcolm Collins: of like- I, I’m so frustrated
Simone Collins: DEI
Malcolm Collins: washing My, my brother retired from Doge recently, and that I, I, I should have sent him this, been like, “Hey, just tear-” Oh ... “tear into this.”
Simone Collins: Doge did not go far enough. It did not. Oh my gosh. That is insane.
Malcolm Collins: But so one of the things that you frequently talk about, and I think it’s an interesting meta conversation to have.
Actually, no, we’re gonna wait. I’m gonna be disciplined. Before we get into this- Discipline ... I do wanna get the full history. Oh, yes ... of how, how... Okay, so you began going into the Bridge stuff, w- you, so you got into the Bridge stuff before the Anna Vale thing?
Kirsche: Yeah. That was, I started the Bridge like research, I wanna say the end of 2023, and then my first posts about it were beginning of 2024 [00:15:00]
Malcolm Collins: Wow.
Okay, so that’s when you begin to get into the, the sort of intellectual deep dive. And she does this not just with research on companies, which you do a lot of, of, of great stuff on, but also research on, like if you wanna know about like Joe Money, like go watch her episode about that, right? Like- Yeah
she’ll go, we’ll do an hour long episode. You’ll have like three hours going into it, right? Oh my gosh. Like really deep stuff.
Kirsche: And I, I super appreciate my audience as well, because it’s like when I do this Bridge deep dive stuff and I, I wanna like show what I’m looking at so nobody can be like, “Oh, she’s just making it up,” it’s like, no, you can see how I found it while I’m live.
Hmm. But it, it is a lot of corpo speak. It is a lot of like dry, “Hey, this is really good information. They’re telling us what they’re gonna do. They’re telling us how they’re going to subvert us,” but it’s very dry, very boring language
Malcolm Collins: Wow. Wow. This, and then this is when, So, so in this part of the timeline, now we’re at the Anna- and the Anna Valen thing was a complete sea change for a lot of people, one, because I think it validated the VTube community for the wider [00:16:00] conservative movement that before it was unsure, like Fox Girl, right?
Like, “What? Ugh, I don’t know. That looks weird. That’s like a furry- Yeah ... thing or something,” right? You know? And we see the outlets that were used to sort of affirming, “Oh, you can trust this,” because they’re mad at it, and then all of a sudden I think a bunch of people were like, “Oh, okay. Okay. I’ll, I’ll take a, I’ll take a look at this.”
Because the story did so well. I, I don’t know if, if y- so on our video on this, I don’t know if you ever, have you ever dove over Anna Valen’s personal diaries?
Kirsche: I don’t know what the personal diaries are, but yeah. We, we found quite a bit on their degenerate interests, I guess you could say.
Malcolm Collins: They’re, they’re really sad. Like, basically- ... their, their life falls apart. That’s our episode where we, we call them a cenobite. I don’t know if you know cenobites from Hellraiser.
Kirsche: Yes.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. They’re like the life of a cenobite. This is what happens.
Kirsche: That’s a, that’s a good word to use.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. We, we, we, we had, like, AI videos where we have, like, cenobites doing book readings with kids and, like-
“Why, why are you having trouble with this?” You know, like, chittering [00:17:00] their teeth. Ah. Yeah, right.
Simone Collins: But,
Malcolm Collins: Then, then post this a really interesting thing happened which was in a huge part because of the, the Vtuber community. W- we go into this deeper in some other episodes, but the Vtuber community is intrinsically more nerdy than other parts of the right.
Like Tim Pool, I, I used to be a big Tim Pool fan myself. I, I don’t find his new stuff as interesting as his older stuff, but he you know, he’s still, like, a n- a normal not nerd guy, right? Yeah. But the Vtuber community, almost intrinsic in its identity, is not gonna crash out on anime, like Matt Walsh or something like that.
Yeah. It’s not gonna crash out on girls in bikinis.
Kirsche: Michael Knowles interviewed a furry recently, so it’s not yet over for me. Maybe I should reach out again
Simone Collins: as well.
Malcolm Collins: Wait. Who, who interviewed a furry?
Kirsche: Michael Knowles. Michael Knowles. He’s part of the- Oh, what furry
Simone Collins: did he interview?
Kirsche: I have no idea. I just saw some-
some video of him on Twitter with, like, a guy in a fur suit in an interview setting, and I was like, “What the hell?”
Simone Collins: [00:18:00] Glass ceilings broken.
Malcolm Collins: Cra- crazy lore on us. We were supposed to be on the last episode of Tucker Carlson. Oh,
Kirsche: wow ...
Malcolm Collins: but he was canceled. Yeah, his booking team and everything. That’s crazy.
We set up a date and everything like that, and then he got canceled. F*****g S- so angry about that. I mean, I wouldn’t wanna be on Tucker Carlson now. I wouldn’t care as much, but I mean, I still would. He’s big enough, I still would.
Simone Collins: Yes, you would. Come on. Yeah.
Kirsche: I have no idea what happened to Tucker Carlson.
I just know that I like his soundbite of, like, “Y- you’ve been a bad girl, and you’re gonna get a vigorous spanking.” What? Why did you say that? Why did you say that? Oh,
Malcolm Collins: we gotta, we
Kirsche: gotta
Malcolm Collins: drop you in on our conspiracies here. So this is one of our biggest conspiracies. It is and I, I don’t know, like, I say it as a joke, but, like, also I wouldn’t put it past him.
It’s that whenever somebody starts being mildly critical of Israel, Mossad poisons them so they go crazy. And then, like, three years later, they’re, like, gibbering insanity. This happened to Tucker Carlson. This happened to Candace Owens. This happened to Nick Fuentes. Like, they all start just m- being mildly critical.
Three years later, crazy.
Kirsche: So it’s like this is the prototype [00:19:00] of the mind control chip, but if you have it in you for too long you just go crazy?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yeah, oh yeah, that, that’s probably it. Oh, like in The Fall Out where they, they turn it on too much and their heads explode.
Kirsche: Yeah, the technology just isn’t there yet.
They only get a good couple of years.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. I know we’re laughing at this, but it did turn out that the Southern Poverty Law Center was the KKK’s major donor. I
Kirsche: mean- So like- It was crazy to find out ...
Malcolm Collins: yeah. They definitely-
Kirsche: There’s so little right-wing extremism, the left has to fund it.
Simone Collins: Yep.
Malcolm Collins: ‘Cause there’s just no- Someone’s gotta do it
really any extremists anymore. There’s no- Yeah. But it ended up pushing this sort of like nerd version of right-wing culture, which I think has, has done a lot to create this sense of community. And it’s one of the things that we’ve noticed as well, where when we started as like right-wing content creators and actually I’d be interested in your thoughts on this all of a sudden because of the VTuber community, we’ve gotten into like this community where like we interact with other people a lot more, which didn’t happen in our early days.
But I guess you never were in that, right? Like, you [00:20:00] always have been interacting with people. Or did it like feel to you like this wider fringe group began to appear all of a sudden? Or
Kirsche: was that only true of me? It definitely, it definitely began to feel like a wider fringe group began to appear. I always kinda kept to myself.
Like, there were only like a few handful of people that I would collab with, especially regularly. I just like, I don’t know, didn’t, didn’t really like reaching out to people too often, and especially once I started going in a more political direction. I was just like-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ...
Kirsche: well, a lot of people just wanna, you know, play games and, and do, do normal stuff, and I don’t wanna have like the effect of, well, their audience is gonna revolt and cause issues for them.
And so like I you- it’s just not, it s- it sounds like a headache, right? Yeah. So I just, I just didn’t do that all that much. And it’s also interesting, I agree with you definitely that the, the Vice situation blew things too outside of the VTuber sphere because in 2024 I was supposed to be on a panel at OffKai, and I got told that [00:21:00] I can’t be on panels because I make volunteers feel unsafe.
And they showed me a handful of tweets like making a joke about Sam Hyde entering a woman’s weightlifting competition or explaining the difference between the LGBTQ extra long acronym between Canada and America, ‘cause we have two different really long acronyms. And apparently me explaining that to people is problematic.
And also like me telling Tim Poole that he was wrong about the Charlemagne clip when, when he was saying Charlemagne wants DEI gone. It’s like, that’s not what he said, Tim. Right, they had, they had a handful of like posts and clips, like my, my pronouns on Discord being burger queen. Mm-hmm. They’re like, “This is why you make people feel unsafe.”
Malcolm Collins: And this is why they feel unsafe. Yeah. No, I mean, these are the tactics they use to control organizations, right? Like-
Kirsche: Yeah. And I mean, I- ... I’ve shown proof of, of like OffKai not only playing these kind of political games where they’re like, “You don’t believe in the things we do, you can’t have a panel here, but we’re gonna have identity politics panel about like being Black and Vtubing.”
Malcolm Collins: Oh my
Kirsche: God. “And we’re gonna actively sabotage people like in Phase Connect on their, on their stage [00:22:00] debuts.” And it’s like, no, people were just like, “Well, Kirsa should have just kept her mouth shut. Kirsa shouldn’t have caused any of this drama. Kirsa shouldn’t have said anything.” Right? Like, this is causing a huge issue for something that like everyone likes going to and it’s like, why do you wanna give money to people that hate you?
Like, yeah, you wanna support your Oshi, yeah, you wanna do things, but shouldn’t you demand like a change in the venue, the people who run the venue? Mm. Because they clearly dislike you. Why would you give them money?
Malcolm Collins: Yes. Well, I wanna, I wanna I’m gonna say this for the end, the, the, the, the going into how we actually fight and win-
Simone Collins: Mm
Malcolm Collins: and where we fought and then not won, and the tactics that we use and the tactics that they use at work. But one interesting tidbit that I thought you’d find fun remember how I said we started this podcast much more progressive? One of the first guests we had on this podcast, I, I doubt you’d be surpri- you, you’d ever be on the same podcast as this person, but was Aella.
Oh,
Kirsche: the f*****g sex lady.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. We had
Kirsche: a- Oh my God ...
Malcolm Collins: an early podcast with her on how to do a consensual non-consent orgy
Kirsche: Didn’t [00:23:00] they just have a tweet recently where, like, somebody got pregnant at a consensual non-consent orgy? Okay, so, yeah, Romy- Like, I
Simone Collins: don’t- Romy- Yeah ... who helped organize her gang bang birthday met her now f- I think future husband also father of her first kid as a fluffer at the p- at the party. And they
Kirsche: moved on to- That is a story you literally cannot tell people.
That is so disgusting.
Simone Collins: Romy, no, in the Bay Area, in the Bay Area, I, I grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area. In the Bay Area,
Malcolm Collins: that’s romantic.
Simone Collins: It is, it is so normative. But- Like, I- you just think that BDSM equipment is part of people’s everyday furniture, and I’m not kidding about that. Like, it’s just- She grew up in San
Malcolm Collins: Francisco, so
Kirsche: yeah.
Yeah, but, like, imagine their kid being like, “Oh, you were the f*****g orgy baby. Do you even know who your real dad is?”
Malcolm Collins: Hold on, we gotta the, the, the funnier thing about all of this is in a recent episode of our show, Romy, the girl who you’re talking about, who met the father of her child at a gang bang, wrote a piece against abortion that radicalized my [00:24:00] wife, Simone, against early stage abortion, like, last week.
Kirsche: That is crazy.
Simone Collins: I was previously against, like, after week 12. So basically when you develop neural tissue and you’re capable of feeling pain. Yeah. Like, no, we’re not doing this. Then it’s about a conversation about euthanasia if, like, you’re gonna die painfully anyway. But, like, before that, whatever, who cares?
I th- I didn’t have any understanding that there was anything wrong with misoprostol or anything like that. And then she writes this incredibly articulate Substack about her experience trying, like, going through a chemical abortion, early stage abortion, and it’s so horrifying. And she develops- It, it, probably, like, postpartum psychosis. Oh, wow. And it’s horrifying. And then she, like, when she talks about it with other people, other women, ‘cause of course this happens a lot in the Bay Area. Like my mother didn’t think that she’d be able to get pregnant around the time she was trying to have me because she had had abortions and they had, I think, been complicated and other things like that.
So I[00:25:00]
I- apparently a lot of women were like, “Oh yeah, I’ve had that terrible, harrowing experience as well trying to, like, get a kind of- When you
Malcolm Collins: talk about harrowing, the piece includes eating babies. If, if we just wanna talk about like- What?
Simone Collins: No, well, not eating bab- Like, a- another woman had passed her, her baby, like, after taking it, like a- after taking misoprostol, and passed the baby in, like, the, the like a dive bar bathroom.
And was like, “There it is.” And then she’s just like, “Well, I have to eat it now.” And she- No you don’t. What the f**k? But like, Rosie’s like, “I completely understand.” And, like, unfortunately I’m so ... I get it too. I’m like, yeah, I ... Like, where are you gonna put it, in the toilet? Like, you have to reintegrate it.
I don’t know. But, like, it’s so heartbreaking and, like, when you actually think about, like, even though this is a very early life, it’s still a life, and it’s still this thing that you’re destroying. And it’s-
Malcolm Collins: Talk about radicalizing. You should read the piece, by the way. It’s radicalizing. You should read it.
Simone Collins: Yeah. It’s- Can I, can
Kirsche: I- Like, I think, I think my, like, least conservative opinion is I’m still on the, like- it, sa- safe, [00:26:00] rare, whatever the f**k it was. Like, or the original reason- Yeah ... for abortion. It’s, like, very early on, very rare, in, like, certain circumstances, like incest, rape. Like, I’m, I’m okay with those kinds of things.
Like, in the case of motherless- That’s how I feel ... the baby is not viable, right? Like, it’s, it’s not- Yes ... going to survive to term.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Kirsche: That makes sense to me. Mm-hmm. But, like, if, if I was in a position where I was getting a chemical abortion, which is obviously, like, you don’t have to go into the doctor for that.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Kirsche: I’m not gonna go out to, like, dive bars or other... I’m like, “I’m gonna stay home as much as possible,” right? ‘Cause, like, why the, why the f**k would I take that risk? Yeah. That’s insane to me.
Simone Collins: Yeah. The,
Malcolm Collins: the, the piece starts with a, an abortion party, right? Just to sort of highlight how little she thought of this at the beginning, but I think it shows, like, people are getting radicalized.
Like- Yeah ... like, even the people you wouldn’t expect.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Kirsche: Yeah, there shouldn’t ever be something called an abortion party. What the f**k is wrong with people? Holy Christ.
Malcolm Collins: Oh.
Simone Collins: And [00:27:00] yeah, I mean, it’s, we’re getting to this point where I think people are now, like, ironically, even if they’re really in far progressive culture, making fun of it from within it like, sort of realizing how sick it is, but then not fully internalizing that until they come face to face with it in some personal way.
And then they’re like, “Oh, wait this really isn’t working out.” And hopefully that will happen before too much damage is done to, to more of society, but we’ll see.
Malcolm Collins: Society’s been pretty damaged, Simone.
Kirsche: Yeah. Yeah, I’m gonna have to agree with that one.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Okay, so, the, the, the direction I wanna go with this is now let’s talk about, like, tactics.
So one of the things that you keep putting, pointing out is that we have these warriors out, like Robbie Starbucks, right? Who will go out and do a piece on a company and be like, “Ah, you see, I exposed them for being woke.” And then a bunch of newspaper articles will come out saying they’re, they said they won’t be woke anymore, and, and they don’t even say that.
And then people on the right just, like, believe it, right? Yeah. And everything goes back to normal, largely speaking. And the policies don’t change. Because once you, you get these [00:28:00] people into companies, it’s very, very hard to cut them out. And in fact, there is only one instance I am aware of, of them being effectively cut out and that was the Twitter acquisition.
Yep. And that required a, what was it? Like 89% reduction in staff.
Kirsche: Yeah, it was a huge reduction, and that, that is the only way to cut them out, is to fire them. Because again, Bridge has been informing companies, like, this should not be a siloed approach. You cannot have DEI just in your marketing or just in your HR team.
Any kind of, like, DEI consultants or DEI teams within your company need to be dissolved, for one, to protect your company from lawsuits against conservative activists like America First Legal. Yeah. And two, because this needs to be a company whole approach. This needs to be completely holistic. All of your employees need to be on board with the DEI work.
And eventually they will just naturally take it home and bring it to their communities and bring it to their dinner tables. This is, this is the ultimate goal. And so whenever these like DEI teams are being dissolved and Robbie [00:29:00] Starbuck was like, “Yeah, we’re winning. We did this.” Even in their press releases they’re like, “We are committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion.”
And it’s like, why can’t anybody read? Just, just like I’m not a genius here, I just have eyeballs. They barely work and I can still read. Like,
Malcolm Collins: So, so let’s, let’s, think through. So the, and I had mentioned before we started recording, like the one instance where like we’ve really successfully won against DEI is in the video games industry.
And that is not, a- and, and we need to talk about like how radical some of these win cases were. We had video games that people were spending like $400 million on that had like a top player count of like a few hundred people.
Kirsche: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Or like 20 people pl- playing a couple weeks post-launch. And this didn’t happen once.
This happened like, it’s still happening today. Like this has been happening for years, it’s still happening today, and it’s like the entire industry. And I think that what I take away [00:30:00] from what happened to the video game industry is boycotts alone will never convince a company that’s infected with DEI to remove the DEI.
Kirsche: Yeah. I-
Malcolm Collins: if, if you couldn’t, I mean, keep in mind when L- Ubisoft like fails, that’s like real people losing hundreds of millions of dollars. Mm-hmm. Right? Like this isn’t like a small thing. When these giant Sony games fail, this is like real hu- And the, even they can’t wake up enough. And so let’s try to think through, why can’t they wake up enough?
Because the people at the very, very top, I don’t feel that they’re actually... I think they think going after DEI, “Well, what if somebody says I’m a racist?” And, and being called a racist in today’s soci- even still, even after all the work we’ve done is still this absolutely toxic thing, when it, when it’s like, even when it’s like not true, right?
That can get you fired, that can lose you LPs. I mean, that happened with us. We were in the private equity space, right? Like [00:31:00] that’s Simone and my background in this sort of thing. We can’t get hired at a major mi- private equity firm now. So it’s wielding that against... What are, what are your thoughts?
I, I’d love to hear your thoughts before I ramble more.
Kirsche: I think that a lot of it is the people in charge of these companies, they understand the maliciousness in their lies, but they are people who believe like once the cultural transformation takes place, we will be positioned in part of the like elite class.
We’re not gonna be like the plebs down there on the bottom. We’ll be in a good position because we have ownership of these companies. People will want us to promote their messages. We’re gonna be part of the ruling class. And then all of the little people who work on the video games who are like, “Yes, DEI is necessary.
You just hate games with women and Black people in them,” they’re like the true believer useful idiot types where they actually believe that they’re doing something good that’s going to have a good effect and is going to help them reach the like utopia that they’re dreaming of in this regard. And so, like, one thing I’ve always been saying ever since I discovered [00:32:00] Bridge was that they are basically foregoing short-term profit for long-term cultural dominance.
So- Still, yeah ... even though we see all of these, all these games and companies losing money, and it’s great, and it’s a win, and I love to see it, definitely keep voting with your wallet, they’ve planned for this. They, they know that they’re going to be losing money because the modern audience doesn’t exist yet.
The modern audience is what they’re striving to create. By transforming all these IPs into something horrendous with Marxism and all this DEI nonsense, the younger generations will mostly have the exposure to these remakes, to these retellings, and to these other stories that are being made right now that we all make fun of and don’t buy.
And that is where the problem lies. Yes, some of us will go to libraries. Some of us have our own, like, VHS or DVD collections. Some of us are smart enough to be like, “We don’t wanna show our children that. We’re gonna only show them the original IPs.” That... You have to think like the average normie. The average normie- Yeah
isn’t gonna be hunting down the classics. They’re gonna be showing their kids whatever [00:33:00] slop exists, which is why we have an entire generation of iPad children in the first place, because that made it much easier to just offload your child to TV.
Malcolm Collins: And so it’s very- Can you imagine how fucked we would be if they were actually competent?
Like-
Kirsche: Yes ...
Malcolm Collins: if, if they could actually make good games or tell good stories, right? Like, we, we actually have an episode on this called the, The Wachowski Effect, which is why do trans people’s ability to tell good stories seem to ch- like, just tank after they transition?
Kirsche: That’s a great question ...
Malcolm Collins: because, like, Dragon Age: Veilguard, the writers for it were the same writers as Mass Effect 2.
Mass Effect 2 was awesome. Wachowsk- the, the Veilguard was terrible, you know? Mm-hmm. And w- I mean, we... It, it could be any number of things. We, we go over a few hypotheses in this. But yeah, we’ve... The, the... And I think this is a core to our eventual victory, is that there... It turns out they’re, like, really bad at their jobs.
Like, once they stuff these companies with DEI people, they are comically inept. M- I mean, we’ve seen this from the [00:34:00] games that they’re making and stuff like that. These are not particularly impressive games. And look at, like, Har- Harley Davidson. What innovation has Harley Davidson made since it, since it w- w- what, what new interesting thing?
What has Campbell’s done? What has... They, they win by capturing institutions, and we can only subvert them by creating counter institutions that are strictly better than the captured institutions. Mm. And I think that this is partially why we have this huge freak-out around AI because AI is allowing for that.
You know, if you look at something like The Skybrow Cinematic Universe. Like, in terms of like the music I listen to on a day-to-day basis, you know, it, it, it includes something like Skybrows or Holy Ball or, you know, any of the, the creators that are directly downstream of our ecosystem. Because the songs that they’re creating are as good as any other song I’m getting out there right now.
And I think with AI in programming hopefully we can see, and I’d really [00:35:00] like to see this in our space, it’s something I’m beginning to work on, is people in our space making video games. And then eventually hopefully we can move to making products. Like, Leaflet had to move to making her own plushies and making plushies for other VTubers because the plushie company wouldn’t work with her because she’s a conservative.
What, what are your
Kirsche: thoughts? I, I would also, I would also say, like, M-Make- Makeship dropping conservative creators was really interesting to me, and throughout my cancellation campaign I was, I was talking to, like, YouTube’s people. They were completely fine working with me again. I just did another plush with them.
So like there are still companies that are like, “You know, we don’t care about the cancel mob. We’re, we’re going to work with people that we think are decent people
Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm. But does that not, I mean, do you... O- okay, so a, a side question before this because there was something you said at the beginning that I was a little confused by.
Do you think the people who actually run these large companies, not the people who run, like, the DEI firms, like Bridge and stuff like that, but the large companies, are they actually committed to the DEI mission, or are they just not thinking? Are they just [00:36:00] sort of like the scare tactics are working against them?
Kirsche: I, I think it’s probably a little bit of both. Depend- it depends on the company, but some of them definitely will have the, like, CEOs who are like, “Yeah, this is all b******t, but I’m gonna push it anyways because it will position me as, you know, a, a person in the ruling class rather than to be ruled over like the other little pleb useful idiots.”
And then there’s also gonna be the people who are like, “Well, I’m terrified of people making a stink, so we should just capitulate to them.” And when, when you encounter one of those, like, “We’re terrified of them making a stink,” you just have to make sure that the counter stink is worse than the initial cancel stink, right?
If companies are more afraid of the backlash that they will get from cutting creators or cutting people from a regular job for just no f*****g reason because everyone’s like, “I hate them. They’re a big meanie pooh-head.” Yeah. As long as companies fear the result that happens after that, then they’ll stop doing it.
At least the ones that are just afraid of that cancel mob anyway.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, we, we did see [00:37:00] a change in company policy if we talk about the victories we’ve had around overly woke advertising after the Dylan Mulvaney thing. Yeah. Like, I have not seen things that bad in advertising since then, but they’re still within the company.
They’re still preventing who can be hired.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: Right? Like, the statistic that came out about the gaming industry, what was it? There, there was, like 45% of, like, new hires in the gaming space over the last year were LGBT. That’s crazy. It’s like that’s, you know, active and aggressive discrimination, right?
You know? Yeah. And w- I mean, once you get that in there, you can’t fight back without creating lateral institutions. Now you’ve mentioned still wanting to work with people if they just cancel s- like, have you thought about what... Yeah, what’s y- what’s your battle plan? You’re, you’re the chief here.
You’ve been at this for longer. You’ve y- you’ve been doing this. What’s, what’s the battle plan here? How do we actually win?
Kirsche: That, that is a great question. In my opinion, what needs to happen in order to get the DEI rot out of companies is either you starve [00:38:00] them for money for so long, like Ubisoft, that they just have to fire everyone and they end up closing down, which, I mean, they haven’t yet, but they might be.
And other than that, it, it’s just like you have to make sure everyone gets fired who’s involved in pushing DEI stuff. And that should be easy to tell based on what their roles used to be at the company, what they did in their positions, the kind of materials they would push, right? Like, you just have to make sure those people cannot be there.
And that’s why, like, colleges, when colleges would be like, “Oh, we’re getting rid of our DEI department,” and then they would just reassign their, like, DEI people to other places. I’m like, they didn’t do anything. They did what Bridge told them to do. They, they reassigned people to embed them elsewhere so it’s less noticeable what they’re doing.
The DEI is still there, and you can’t believe them that it’s not there until they fire these people
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Okay, so how best to starve them? So one of the things that, that I’m seeing so this is a trend we’ve noted among conservative women in our circles. And this happened [00:39:00] after we learned that Leaflet buys from the same f- clothing manufacturer Simone does which is we’ve learned that a lot of conservative women are just buying, like, medieval clothes on Etsy.
Kirsche: Yeah, pretty much. Yeah, yeah, actually.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, God.
Simone Collins: They work. They’re good.
Kirsche: Yeah, they, they are.
Malcolm Collins: But I think that across brands we’re in a world where we can do that now, right? Like, if a stuffy company isn’t good enough, a, a, a single VTuber like Leaflet can figure out how to make it herself. If a- Mm-hmm ... a clothing brand, they’re annoying, we can build our own supply chains.
And with AI, increasingly we can make our own products. So I was talking to you before the stream, but, like, if you look at the AI system that we’ve built, ‘cause we’re just constantly building new systems, we’ve built best chatbots on the market. We’ve built best AI both not safe for work video and image generation on the market that uses every mainstream model.
VTuber creation, recipe creation, an auto stalker and,
Kirsche: I think it’s also really funny how, like, the people on the left have gone from, “Ha ha, no one wants to work [00:40:00] with you, you stupid chud” to, “Ha ha, you have to use AI because no one will work with you, you stupid chud.”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And it’s like, but AI is awesome.
I like
Simone Collins: the AI stuff. And also, yeah, like, ha ha, I will never use AI, and then their lunch is eaten by all the people who are just building better companies. It’s like-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. The, the product we’re working on now that’ll hopefully be done in, like, a week or something like that is we also have a vibe coding software that we’ve built, but is gonna be an integration for, like, email and Discord and WhatsApp, and all of the places where people reach out to you just because of us as, like, famous content creators, and I’m like, “I only want this in one place.”
Mm-hmm. And then complete automation for that. And I’m like, I’m really annoyed that no one has done that very well yet, so I just decided to do it myself. But, like, people in our space can just build stuff, like build games, build s- And I wanna really encourage that, ‘cause I think that that’s the only way for us to realistically eat at their money.
Like, if somebody- Mm-hmm ... in our space starts creating motorcycles, I bet they would be much better motorcycles than Harley motorcycles. And I think it’s probably doable. I [00:41:00]
Kirsche: mean, there’s definitely a barrier of entry to doing stuff like that, especially whereas, I mean, it, it’s starting to get a bit better, and I know some companies that I’ve worked with are looking to get more manufacturing back onto the American side instead of having to use China for everything, which is great.
I love that. Yeah. I would love more, like, American-made products, especially to offer to my audience. And, and so it’s like there, there is a barrier of entry to, like, making physical stuff like that. But yeah, I agree. If, if somebody has the wherewithal to do that, like, absolutely set up a competing company.
Try to... Like, you, you’re probably not even gonna have to try too hard to get business away from a company that people have to begrudgingly buy for, from because there’s, like, not- Not really m- much else to go for, right? Like, a company- Yeah ... Nas- usually, like they control so much, you know?
Malcolm Collins: Well, people hate these companies now, and, and, and they are increasingly...
I mean, if they become increasingly inefficient and when I talk about them being inefficient, look at the cost of, of food these days. Look at the cost of the things- Mm-hmm ... you buy out there these days. Mm-hmm. The cost of the raw components have not gone [00:42:00] up that much. What you’re paying for is corporate incompetence.
That, that’s been the primary point of inflation. You, you talk about this on your show but like, if you look at the education system in terms of like putting money into public schools, and you look at a graph of like increasing costs over time, the amount of money that’s going for teachers over like the past 20 years has been about the same.
Mm-hmm. The amount of money going to administration has increased like 20x.
Kirsche: Yeah, the useless daycare jobs.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And so, it’s, it’s... I, I guess burn this stuff down, but also on the right, r- we need super doge. I think you’re right about that. That’s what I want from the next president is super doge.
Kirsche: Yes.
Malcolm Collins: I
Simone Collins: don’t know.
I don’t, I really don’t know if that’s possible. Part of me is just like let these systems... I mean, they are financially unsustainable. With demographic collapse, they will crumble. Like they, they will, they... Their days are numbered, so just let them collapse. And more important it is, it’s, it is more important now to invest in and focus on the alternate systems that we’re going to have to [00:43:00] all adopt- Mm
as those systems crumble and fall apart. Like just today, I’m so excited about Midjourney’s medical announcement that they have this new scanner that is faster and hopefully in the future less expensive than an MRI that can be integrated with like a spa experience. And it’s coming from like the company that I use to generate AI anime images.
Like it’s, it’s amazing. And it’s... I, I think that we are going to see, to your point, like we don’t necessarily have to think, well, I don’t know if we’re ever gonna see US manufacturing again. I don’t think we’re ever gonna see like armchair scientist control of medical technology again because AI is weirdly and disruptively going to make a lot possible that we didn’t think was possible.
Kirsche: I think there’s also something to be said for like building your own ecosystem and getting together with other people to help build them things as
Simone Collins: well. Absolutely. Yeah.
Kirsche: But not just like waiting for the old giants to fall apart. This is, this is the point where it’s like you have to be aggressive in at the bare minimum being like, “Don’t buy [00:44:00] products from these people and here’s why.”
Like not doing the same preachy thing that leftists do where it’s just like, “If you buy these things, you’re an evil Hitler.” But it’s like you wanna get that information out so people know like, “This is what this company is doing. This is what they’re gonna continue to do. They’re lying to you, and they’re trying to subvert you.”
Malcolm Collins: Absolutely. Well, and I think, and I think for my audience, this is... I, I, I... One thing I like about this space is, like, you obviously were a big motivation for, like, Sky Browse to do some of his early videos and stuff like that, right? Like-
Kirsche: His videos are so freaking good, man.
Malcolm Collins: Aren’t they? They’re fantastic.
Amazing. Have you seen it all, by the way?
Simone Collins: Oh.
Kirsche: I’ve seen- Yeah ... a good chunk and I’ve, I’ve left some to play while I’m working. They’re like-
Malcolm Collins: Our kid sings them all the time. Now our kid is, is singing the, the, the Mormon one, the, the Bricks and Mini Pigs. Cool. You know, like...
Kirsche: I haven’t even gotten into that situation.
I had a few people in my chat tell me about it, and I was like, “Oh, I should look into it.” But then so much information kept coming out about it, I was like, “How am I going to- You- ... digest this?”
Malcolm Collins: It’s, it’s incred- It will, it will [00:45:00] piss you off so much. Like, like so many times, and I think that this is, is, is, is important w- more widely in our community, is be like, look, I like Mormons, I want Mormons on, on the in, but, like, we do need to get in some sort of intra community policing, right?
Like, we, we, we sometimes go into this with, like, I’m a big fan of Jews, right? But like everyone’s always like, “Malcolm, Greater Israel,” and I’m like, I don’t much care about the countries around Israel. Like, okay, Greater Israel, f- whatever. But, I’m
Kirsche: kind of just like, that’s not my sand, not my problem.
I don’t care about anything that exists- Yeah ... in the sandbox. I just don’t want American people or American money going to any wars over there.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, absolutely. We, we need to cut off funding for Israel. And I, and I was like, I don’t understand why we don’t just do that. It’d be such a win for the Trump administration.
It-
Kirsche: I would love to cut off aid from everywhere. Like, holy s**t. At least, like, I understand if we wanna maintain our position as, like, a super world power that nobody can f**k with. Like, occasionally we’ll have to just, like, throw money at some p- places. But for the [00:46:00] most part, I think we should cut that off entirely.
Cool. Like, zero aid to anywhere for at least a little while.
Simone Collins: Well, and it’s really, it’s not even our aid that matters. It’s, it’s our supply chains and buying power. Right. So, like, we don’t even need to provide aid. We can just change small incentives here and there with where things are shipped- Well, and see-
and how things are shipped ...
Malcolm Collins: w- I think we’ve gotta be aware of the consequences of cutting all aid. Like, look, when US aid was cut, the, the, the thing was cut look at all the elections of Latin America since then. Rightists keep getting elected.
Kirsche: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Like, clear- clearly this has had a huge- Not enough
huge impact on these countries.
Kirsche: Clearly ...
Malcolm Collins: some of, some of them are putting people in jail and, and now have lower rates of homicide than they’ve ever had before.
Kirsche: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Some of them are cutting major social programs. Th- this is horrifying.
Kirsche: Horrifying for whom?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, right. I love that Trump and Argentina are, they get along so well now that they’re like, “Hey, let’s, let’s hand back those islands from the UK,” right?
Like- Oh
Simone Collins: my
Kirsche: gosh. And everyone was just like, “Oh, I thought people on the right wanted foreign aid cut. What about all this money he gave Argentina?” It’s like, well, [00:47:00] Argentina paid it back after, like, six months or some s**t, so...
Malcolm Collins: that’s true. That’s also awesome that like the in, in Latin America we are seeing a lot of projects work.
Like what’s happening in El Salvador is amazing.
Kirsche: It is. And I, I wish we could do like El Salvador and just start arresting activist judges who keep f*****g things up. I wish we could just do that.
Malcolm Collins: And the El Salvador prison system is apparently like really, really cool and good. They really focus on like, getting people jobs and stuff like that, and like- Huh.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, they’re, they’re nice. They have, you know, they have the nice prisons and they have the less nice prisons. But the nice ones are super nice. Well, the, for
Malcolm Collins: the kids anyway. Yeah. You just, you know, I, I, I don’t mind the, the, the Trump policy of just like instead of prison, just like e- the, the sending migrants just like where- wherever they can.
Like when they- Make public bathrooms great again ... when they can’t send them back to their own country, they’ll just be like, “Ah, we’ll send them to Haiti or whatever.”
Simone Collins: Yeah. Just-
Malcolm Collins: But I, no, I mean, I think the point I was making earlier is if you’re a fan of this show- [00:48:00] With AI and stuff like that. I’m not saying go out and white label some existing product and make it conservative or something like that, right?
I’m saying and, and AI can really help you with this. Figure out how to buy beans from a local farmer somewhere and ship them in a means that’s cost efficient. If you can do that using a network of AIs, you can get a cheaper product on the sale shelf than Campbell has, and a better product on the shelf than Campbell has, right?
Like, this is true of all of the products all the way down. With AI, we can just do things better now. I, I know with something like, okay, putting together a motorcycle. Yes, I’d love if you do it in the United States, but you know, you talk to the right shops across like China and Shen- Shenzhen and stuff like that, you can get the parts made inexpensively enough, stress test them, then have them constructed in the United States to get over the tax and, th- like, I, I want...
I think for so long we’ve been trapped in this life of you go to college, which doesn’t help people anymore and is one of the core sources [00:49:00] of rot- Yeah ... and you then get a day job. And I think what I wanna radicalize people into doing is like at least look into the alternatives. And I love Leafly’s music video about this, like don’t go to college.
Like, like put that money into trying to start a job because you’ll learn more in the-
Kirsche: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But yeah. W- there’s, there’s so many opportunities out there now. But anyway, so- g- continue to go on. I, I don’t mean to-
Kirsche: No, no, you’re fine. I tangent all the time. It’s great. And it’s like I, I agree with you as well, like we should be setting up our own-
like parallel systems if we can, but it, it’s harder in certain areas than, than in others. Like, when, when Stream Elements announced that they might be shutting down or they’re being bought out by nobody knows yet, but when Stream Elements announced that, a lot of us went, “Wait a minute, what are we gonna do now?”
That was like the- What are Stream Elements gonna do? ... the link to use to like get donations without YouTube or Twitch or anywhere else taking a cut. And now what are we supposed to use? What, what else is there?
Malcolm Collins: It’s, it’s a donation platform. Well- I mean, okay, so [00:50:00]
Kirsche: it’s a donation platform ... basic- basically, it’s a donation platform, and what they do is they have it so you can pay with PayPal, and obviously you can use, like, a credit card and PayPal or whatever, and that’ll go to your PayPal, but it obscures, like, your personal information.
And then they also have something called SE Pay, where if the person doesn’t wanna use PayPal, there’s a lot of people in my community especially who are like, “Screw PayPal, I don’t wanna use them. You need to have an option to dono that doesn’t use PayPal or require a login.”
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Kirsche: So SE has SE Pay, and so you can just use your card or, like, a prepaid card or whatever to, to pay through SE Pay, and it bypasses...
It has nothing to do with PayPal whatsoever. And so it was nice to have this, like, donation link-
Malcolm Collins: I could build you
Kirsche: that ... that did that and obscured, obscured your information so nobody got your name, nobody got your address, nothing like that.
Malcolm Collins: I, I, I can probably build you that in a week or so.
Kirsche: Yeah, that’s...
So, like, that was, that was something where people were just like, “Well, what am I gonna do?” And, like, there’s Streamlabs, but Streamlabs had a problem years ago where they tried, like, infringing on OBS, where, like, [00:51:00] OBS was like, “We don’t care. Everybody can use our, our code and everything.” But Streamlabs was trying to be like, “Well, we made this.
This is ours,” and everything was just, like, copy-pasted from OBS
Malcolm Collins: No, I’m, I’m being serious Is there an
Simone Collins: alternative now? Like, what are people using instead? Yeah.
Kirsche: No, everyone’s still on either Streamlabs or Stream Elements- Yeah ... because that’s, that’s what there is. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But yeah, I can build this for you. That
Kirsche: would be crazy. And so many VTubers would use it ... I can
Malcolm Collins: build this for you. Yeah, so- I just
Simone Collins: feel like there’s spe- like what your, what your m- m- most important and, like, desired things are. No, hold on- ‘Cause if you do
Malcolm Collins: that- Hold on, hold on, Simone. I, I need to explain something.
So the way... The big challenge in putting something like this together is that the credit card companies will try to get to you, because the credit card companies are very aggressive. Yeah. Yeah. But, essentially what we do is you donate to our nonprofit. And- ... if you use your correct email address, it then accredits points to a separate site- Hmm ... sort of behind the scenes. Interesting. And so the payment providers don’t see this. So- Mm-hmm ... we would still lose any margin that we lost on the payment provider, and then we’d probably add some [00:52:00] small, like, one or 2% margin on this.
And then the- ‘
Kirsche: Cause I was gonna say, I think when it comes to Stream Elements, the SE pay, the only percentage taken out is the processing fee from the card companies, which is why everybody uses it.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, okay. Well, I mean, I could do it without taking out any money as a good favor, but... If people mention our site.
Okay, so I’ll do it without taking out any money. Yeah ... so we’ll just take out the, the card processing fees and just have it go directly to whoever the streamer is. I- in terms of obscuring user information, all of that will obviously be captured by the payment provider. Mm-hmm. But I can obscure it on our end, if that makes you feel better.
Kirsche: Yeah, I mean, if you haven’t used Stream Elements before, I can always, like, take some screenshots and, like, show you what the dashboard and stuff looks like internally.
Simone Collins: That would be really
Malcolm Collins: helpful. How do they make money if they’re not taking any
Kirsche: The way that Stream Elements made money is Stream Elements was, first and foremost, before they came out with SE pay, a sponsorship platform.
Yeah, yeah. So they would go and find sponsorships, and they would post them on their website, and then streamers could go and sign up for them. And when you got big enough, you would have, like, a Stream Elements representative who would personally contact you and be like, [00:53:00] “Hey, we have these sponsors available.
There’s this many seats. We wanted to reach out to you. Do you wanna do these?” And so they would make their money from the sponsorships, because, you know, they’re probably taking a cut from those before we get paid out.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, okay. Another thing to note is the company that does all this is actually a nonprofit, so people can donate to it as a tax deduction as well.
So- Oh ... I’ll, I’ll try to get this set up for you.
Kirsche: No, that would be interesting. I’m sure a lot of people would be very nice to have something. ‘Cause, like, when, when Stream Elements announced that, like, we don’t know who’s buying them yet still. But it’s like- Yeah ... I can only imagine all of us are just like Well, is it gonna work the same way?
Like, we don’t know who’s buying it, so we don’t know how they might f**k it up. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Very exciting. Okay. Yeah, sure. Just send me what you want and... But this is what I’m talking about, right? Like, if, if somebody’s leaving the space and they’re being a jerk, I’m like, “Okay. I, I can build this for, for...
Operate it for free in exchange for a promotion for our site,” right? Like, Yeah ... that’s, that’s an easy thing for me to do. And it’ll work for as long as it doesn’t explode and get big. I mean, obviously our platform is very [00:54:00] chud, so all the progressive VTubers are still gonna be on it. Great. B- because, yeah, we have... Like, one of the features that we have is a feature that searches every not safe for work image gallery at the same time. What the heck? ... just to annoy the, the the people who, who freak out about that stuff. But yeah, that’s really cool. What other bottlenecks do you have? I, I built the VTuber automated creation system because Leaflet said that people would appreciate that.
Mm-hmm. What, what other issues do you have?
Kirsche: I mean, me personally, I have issues with artists being reliable. Like the illustration artists I’ve worked with, they’re amazing. I love them, love every single one of them I’ve worked with. But model artists I’ve basically been waiting on my main model to be finished since 2020.
It was supposed to be finished in 2020. I have another model that’s been being worked on for several years now as well. It’s like my, my riggers or my artists just kinda disappear or don’t finish their work, and then I’m out thousands of dollars.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah. So we have a system that can get you a new... So I, I’ve got to improve it.
Like we’ve obviously got to improve the end-to-end system. We don’t [00:55:00] have hand movement yet. I’m still working on boob physics. But you, you... I’ll send it to you and you can, you can try the beginning of it. But it works for a low-quality model now, and I can get it working for a high-quality model with...
Like what you would probably wanna do is generate something with our system, then hire a rigger to refine it. And with the refinement and an artist to refine it, like- Mm-hmm ... refine the eyes and stuff like this in a few areas. And I, I think you can get a model that’s as high quality as the model you have now with just a few additions to what we have.
Kirsche: This, this was given to me by a community member, Fumetsu no Tora. He makes things very fluffy. He has a very distinct art style. I like it. And he, he made this as like a gift for me, and I’ve had a few of these gift models because people in my community have just gotten like, just so- Annoyed ... frustrated.
And, and it’s, I, I appreciate that they get frustrated on my behalf because it’s like I, I can’t even show the extent of frustration I feel for how long some of this stuff has taken. Like I understand that being an artist is not, you know, a traditional job, but if you’re making your money off [00:56:00] of it, you should be treating it professionally in my opinion.
And in the VTuber sphere it’s kind of, taboo to call out artists. Like even if an artist has like taken your money and fled- ... you are still considered the one starting drama by bringing- The riggers,
Malcolm Collins: man. So this is something I’d like a callout in my audience for because it’s something that I don’t have the time to make my skill and it would really help make this an end-to-end cycle is the RFAB VTuber creation system.
If anybody wants to specialize on post-output improvement of our models because it gets most of the way there I’d be happy to intro you to people who need that service and even advertise you on the website if that’s something that you wanted to, to build as a skill set if you’re like, “I need a Some- but, but no being flaky.
We’re gonna be pretty strict about, like, actually getting things done within short time windows.
Simone Collins: We’re also actually pretty good at being go-betweens between commissioners and artists, ‘cause that was literally our first startup as a married couple. [00:57:00] Oh.
Kirsche: See, that is, that’s incredibly... That’s pretty much what VGen is.
And I, I like VGen as opposed to SKEB, because with SKEB, like, you’re not allowed to contact the artist at all. And so if you get given something and you’re, like, missing something you’re basically up s**t creek. Whereas on VGen, you, you can message them and be like, “Hey, you forgot this file,” or, “Hey, you didn’t make the background on this transparent.”
And it’s like I’ve, I’ve never really liked SKEB, and I used them once. And the one time I used them I had asked for, like, transparent backgrounds so that I could use the stuff I’m paying for in streaming, and I wasn’t given the transparent backgrounds, and obviously I can’t contact them, so I can’t get it fixed.
Oh, my gosh. And there wasn’t any way to get rid of the entire background, so it just looked really s**t with trying to, like, edit the background out myself. And so I, I could never use those things that I got.
Simone Collins: That’s so
Malcolm Collins: frustrating. That is incredibly frustrating.
Simone Collins: Yeah, what we used to do was we had a platform that had artists and then clients, and we would match them.
And we would do all the communication. So, like, a client would say [00:58:00] something really, that would really make an artist, like, sad and not wanna work on it anymore. And then we’d, like, say it in the nicest possible way and be like, “They love it so much. There’s just this one adjustment that they realize would make it
Kirsche: so
Simone Collins: much better.”
See, like, I
Kirsche: need... ‘Cause, like, cucking the artist is terrifying to me now, ‘cause it’s like-
Simone Collins: Yeah ...
Kirsche: I don’t, I don’t want, I don’t wanna be that client that’s just, “Oh, you need to fix a million things.” And I, I- Yeah ... haven’t been thus far, thankfully. But it’s also, like, I’ve had so many issues that I just I just don’t like talking to artists much anymore.
Simone Collins: Yeah, like you just want someone to, like handle it and make sure the thing comes out good, and we did that. It’s just that there wasn’t a market for it, so it wasn’t a business that could survive on its own. But like, I totally get it, and yeah, it all came from- It’s so weird ... Malcolm, Malcolm proposed to me on Reddit using commissioned art.
Aw. And then he experienced like how hard it was to work with artists, ‘cause he tried to commission, I think he commissioned like 21 pieces- Oh my God ... and discovered, like firsthand, “Oh, this is really hard.” It
Kirsche: is really hard.
Simone Collins: Artists are super unstable.
Kirsche: They are. I mean, I guess [00:59:00] you have to have some kind of instability to be like super creative and bring out like images from your brain.
That makes sense, but like, have, have the kind of volatility that makes it so you still get work done.
Malcolm Collins: Well, it’s, it’s so funny that people are like, “AI replaced all of the things we didn’t want replaced first,” like art and music and everything like that, and I’m like, no, what AI did is it made it so that average jackoffs like myself can be good at art and music, right?
Like, it democratized
Simone Collins: art. Yeah, like they’re doing... We’re, we’re using AI to make art that artists just refuse to make for us. They’re like, “Oh, I’m busy. I can’t do it.” Yeah, it’s like- Like, how dare you take our jobs? ... artists are
Kirsche: refusing. We’re not even, like, taking work away from artists, right? It’s like-
Simone Collins: Yeah, they weren’t t-
they didn’t do- They weren’t accepting our requests. Yes. I mean, they were busy. I, I, we’re making
Malcolm Collins: a VTuber model of Muhammad, right? Who am I gonna get to do that, right? Like, I almost did that. I, I do- Oh,
Simone Collins: come on. It’s not even that. I mean, ‘cause I had to deal, of course, with our, our, our commissioning platform for like all the excuses from artists if like something didn’t happen, and we would, you know, refund our clients.
Like, the money wouldn’t disappear ‘cause it was being held- Yeah ... in escrow by us. Excuses I got included, “Oh, I [01:00:00] can’t take this on, I’m pet sitting for the next month.” Like-
Kirsche: What the heck? ...
Simone Collins: how is watching someone’s cat going to prevent you from drawing a very simple anime line drawing? Like, there’s This doesn’t make
Kirsche: sense.
It doesn’t. It really doesn’t.
Simone Collins: The- these are-
Kirsche: And it’s like I’ve, I’ve had a problem with an artist before where I was like, “Hey, it’s been like a year and a half, and I see that you consistently reopen your commissions and take on new projects, and you finish those new projects before mine. If you don’t wanna work on my project, please just let me know so I can find another artist who can.”
And they’d be like, “No, no, I wanna do it.” It’s like, it’s like they wanted, I guess like, maybe clout from like working with a bigger person, but then like never finishing it. So it’s like, what, what am I suppo- like... And when they’re delayed this much, I lose opportunities. Yeah. I lose ability to do certain things.
Yeah. If I had like stuff planned out, I can’t do any of that. And so like I’ve stopped planning anything around models because I just can’t find artists to finish them.
Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s really frustrating.
Malcolm Collins: Well then, okay, I’ll get back to-
Simone Collins: Malcolm, make it better. Make it better.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. I’ll, I’ll work on the [01:01:00] VTuber thing.
I’ll send you some of the models that we’ve made already so you can get an idea of like how high quality they are. Mm-hmm ... they’re, they’re decent enough. And I’ll, I’ll continue to improve on the rigging system and everything like that. But what I really need is somebody who’s just like a specialist in this.
So any of our audience who wants to take the time to do this, it’s, it’s... The problem with this versus everything else on the website is I need to go through with every algorithmic change and then load up, add the textures on the model, which all happens automatically but takes time. Mm-hmm. Then load it into VTuber Studio and test if the ears wiggle right.
And if the ears don’t... And, and I have to have different wiggles for animal ears, and elf ears, and human ears. Mm-hmm. By the way, all of this is handled algorithmically. We have a different way of handling snouts- Mm ... so like furry models work and, you know, the, the-
Kirsche: That’s really cool ... I,
Malcolm Collins: I spend way too much time trying to get this right.
Yeah. Well, because I want people to have something that they can use, but,
Kirsche: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: it’s, it’s with, with all of these fields, we can make something better. There’s nothing that prevents us from [01:02:00] creating the, the better version of these various things. And after this we’ll wrap things up. After this with you do we have like an open chat on like Discord, or where, where do you talk to people?
Where, where do you
Kirsche: like- Dis- Discord is the best way to get in touch with me. Like I’m still, I have like probably 40 DMs unchecked right now, but it’s still the best way to get in touch with me. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Are we, are we friends on there?
Kirsche: Yeah. Yeah, what she said.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: C-H.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And I will build you this thing that you need. It ju- it just was sent to you. Okay ... and, and, I mean, it’s basically nothing to build. It’s literally just a payment sub-system that goes to you, so really all it needs is like- Yeah, with attribution
a way to manage the payment to you. So I, I can handle that.
Simone Collins: That’s very- It’s
Kirsche: just
Malcolm Collins: no one else in the world will do it for free, but I guess I’ll do it for free for clout, ‘cause,
Kirsche: That’s, that’s what, that’s what Stream Elements had. I’m like, I’m, I’m guessing, right? I’m guessing the way they made money is, like, when companies would approach them, like Raid Shadow Legends, and they’re like, “Hey, we have 500 slots for this kind of sponsor thing,” I’m assuming [01:03:00] they would pay Stream Elements before Stream Elements, like, pushed out that sponsor to the rest of us.
‘Cause, like, we never get sponsor money taken out. Whatever we make from a sponsor, like, we keep that under Stream Elements. Oh. So, like, the o- the only thing I could figure is, like, companies pay them for the advertising. That’s the only thing I could think of the way that they were making money.
Malcolm Collins: Wait, hold on.
Here’s what I don’t understand. Why don’t you guys just set up a payment processor that goes directly to you?
Kirsche: I asked. I have guys who work on my websites, like Kirsche.com, and I asked them about adding a page that has, you know, kinda like what Stream Elements did, where it’s just a donation link that obscures all of my, my personal information from, like, PayPal or whatever.
And they were like, “Well, that could be done, but then it gets a little dicey because then we’re holding on to all of that money for you until you withdraw it. And for tax time, that could make things a little weird as well.”
Malcolm Collins: I guess that’s true
Kirsche: I mean, I don’t know. I’ve never set up a payment processor. I don’t care about how the money- I’m, I’m just relaying what I’ve been told
Malcolm Collins: goes through at all. Yeah. I, I, I don’t care [01:04:00] about that. We already handle really complicated taxes for the nonprofit, so whatever. If something can be used... What? You handle it, Simone. I’m sorry. I d- I saw that- Yeah,
Simone Collins: I just... No problem That
Kirsche: face
Simone Collins: of- As the man who has not touched a single receipt related to this entire thing.
We have no accountant. It’s just me over here. No problem. Ooh. But it’s just accounting. Oh, that
Kirsche: made me remember. During my GamerSupps merch drop last year they had a separate gifting website where people could, like, buy my merch items- Oh, cool ... and they would, like, be floating around in the ether that people could claim as, like, a gift.
And you, you had, like, a limit obviously. Like, s- no- no one could claim, like, every single thing. But, like, my community has been asking for that for my website, and I asked my website guys, and they were just like, “That would cost so much to host.” I don’t, I don’t know what it would cost to host. I... My community has really wanted something like that.
Malcolm Collins: Wait, explain the feature to me again. Explain the feature?
Kirsche: I’ll have to go find screenshots, ‘cause I took screenshots of it when I had it. But basically it was a, [01:05:00] an adjacent site to the official GamerSupps website, and it was, like, a gifting platform. And so you, like, you logged in via, I think, Twitch, and they were talking about maybe integrating, like, YouTube or whatever with it later, but it was just Twitch integration for now.
And so, like, people could go to the website and buy, like, a Kirsche cup or a Kirsche desk mat, and they could either pick a person on Twitch to specifically claim it- Oh ... so it’d be, like, tagged to that person’s Twitch name, and that person could go and claim it. Or if they just wanted to buy, like, 20 cups and have, like, anyone redeem them, they would buy, like, 20 Kirsche cups, and those would be floating around in the ether, and you could go to the gift page, and you could hit claim cup, and then you would put in your shipping information, and you’d have to pay for shipping.
But everything is given to, you know, different people. That
Simone Collins: sounds like so much fun. I like the
Malcolm Collins: idea.
Kirsche: Yeah. I c- Everyone loved it. And I like the idea. I wanna do that. Yeah, I like the idea because, like, there, there are some community members who, like, you know, they might be in a bad financial place. They might want something to support the creator, but they, they don’t have the money to do so.
Malcolm Collins: It’s a great idea.
Kirsche: And then the giga whales come in and they’re just like, “Here, my children. Have the gifts. I am Santa,” you know? Yeah. [01:06:00]
Malcolm Collins: I can build this. I can build this. I got... Yeah, d- br- just when you have things you want, come to me in the future, and I’ll just
Kirsche: give you what you want. Oh, hell f*****g yeah.
Hell yeah. Yeah, I- And I’ll try,
Malcolm Collins: I’ll try to make some of the screenshots for you ... remember there was a, there was a LeetBit stream where we had people come in on the stream and they were like, “I want an AI DM for, like, dungeon, dungeon master that, like, handles that.” And I was like, “I’ll make it. It’s done.”
The, the the, the stalker feature I made for Simone. She goes, “I wanna stalk people more easily online.” I was like, “Okay, I’ll, I’ll build that for you.”
Simone Collins: Call it Super stalk and then The recipe maker
Malcolm Collins: I, I put together based on the
Simone Collins: Yeah, but no,
Kirsche: but this is exciting. I love hearing that, like, you wanna get in the nitty-gritty and, like, build these kind of platforms that either only exist in, like, tiny little bubbles or we’re excluded from because we’re chuddy buddies.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, chuddy buddies. The chuddiest of platforms, right? You know, everybody comes in and... No, no, I love doing it because it annoys the leftists, okay? If I can make a good- How
Kirsche: dare you build your own things.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, if I can make a good VTuber rig [01:07:00] system, and then a bunch of VTubers start using it and the leftists will witch hunt their own, Yeah
infinitely, “Are you using the chud VTuber system? Are you using- Did you get chud
Kirsche: rigging?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. It’s hilarious.
Kirsche: And so I’ve, I’ve been told by a couple illustration artists I’ve worked with as well, like, they’ve, they’ve had large VTubers come to them and be like, “You can’t work with Kirsche. You have to reject her if she ever comes and tries to get artwork from you.”
And they’re just like, “Well, why? Like, I want money. I don’t care.”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Well, I mean, one of the funniest things is AI, and I don’t know how much you use AI on a daily basis anymore. How, how much do you use AI?
Kirsche: I really don’t use AI much at all for anything. My, my head moderator uses AI a lot to, like, double check things or get more sources if I need them or whatnot.
Yeah. And he’s, he’s been great with AI. He makes my thumbnails with AI just because it would, you know, take forever to get an artist to finish- Works great ... different thumbnails as often as I like to change them. But I mean, I’d be willing to use AI [01:08:00] for most things. I think my, my hard stop at the moment is, like, when I’m selling merchandise, I want the artwork on that merchandise to be from a real person that I paid money to.
Yeah. I would feel weird, like, putting AI art on merch. And so for everything that I sell, I, I try to find an artist that kind of matches up with, like, the head image that I have. Because, like, I also would not want to go to an artist and be like, “Hey, change your entire style. Make it this way.” So I try to find an artist that matches with, like, the vision that I have.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, but with AI, this is one of the big areas where we have a huge advantage against the corpos and the average leftist is it’s like the leftists are trying to fight us without beautiful women and without AI, right? Like, th- we should have no trouble cleaning up against this.
Kirsche: Oh, I just thought of something as well.
Your, your, like, VTuber model creation thing is also going to fix another issue some VTubers have fallen into. So back in the day you guys know who Project Melody is, right?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. [01:09:00]
Kirsche: So Project Melody her model artist DMCA’d a lot of her videos and was trying to strong arm her to pay him more money to use her model that she already paid for- Oh
because she didn’t have a contract saying that she had, like, full IP rights to the model from him. And so there have been a, a couple of other, I think, smaller VTubers who had a similar issue, but it’s like- Oh, okay. Oh my ... whenever, whenever you get your model, like, you need to have an airtight legal contract just in case, just in case that artist decides, “Well, now you’re huge.
I made your model when you had, like 500 viewers, but now you have, like, 5,000, and I want more money,” right? So, like, so they can’t harm you after the fact.
Malcolm Collins: That’s very frustrating. Yeah. Well, anyway, it’s been absolutely great to have you on. I- Sorry if
Kirsche: I ran just a bit over your time.
Malcolm Collins: No, I, I love this.
I love this. This is great. And I’m happy to do, you know, if you wanna come on again, if you want o- one of us on ever. I mean, usually it’s just me ‘cause Simone can’t handle weird times. But
Kirsche: This is true. Under- I mean, she has a baby, you [01:10:00] know? So,
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: It makes it tough, you know?
Malcolm Collins: We got, we have five-
Kirsche: I can imagine.
Simone Collins: Yeah, with five it’s complicated.
Malcolm Collins: Trying to replace them. Yeah. That’s, that’s our goal. We have a, a live, laugh, love poster in our house that says, “We will replace you,” i- in, in live, laugh, love style.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: So when the reporters come over- Beautiful ... they always get really freaked out. They’re like, “What?”
Kirsche: I, I got...
When I had my PO box, which I, I shut it down because a lot of stuff was just getting kicked back return to sender, like my mail wasn’t being delivered for some reason. Yeah. But one of the things that got delivered was a like Korean flag with Kim Jong Un on it, and it said, “Live, laugh, love.” That’s so
Simone Collins: good.
Oh my gosh. Where do we get one of those? That is amazing. I
Kirsche: have no idea, but I saw that, I was like, “Who sent this? What the heck?” Yeah.
Simone Collins: Thank you, kind stranger. Yeah. Thank you.
Kirsche: That’s a beautiful gift. I love this. Wow.
Malcolm Collins: Oh,
Simone Collins: we
Malcolm Collins: should do something like that, Simone.
Simone Collins: That sounds legit amazing. He’s a very
Malcolm Collins: creative little dreamer or whatever.
Yeah. And also I, the main reason I wanna connect with you on, on, on Discord is just to build, because the stuff that you, you say you need built is not difficult for me to build. It might be difficult for my wife to handle the [01:11:00] accounting on.
Simone Collins: It’s just accountable. I, I think I can figure it out as long as, yeah, the, the reporting.
I mean, the reporting has to be clear for each creator to see what they’ve gotten. So as long as I can see it and keep track of it, it’s okay.
Malcolm Collins: All right. Well, fantastic. Thank you so much for coming on the show. Yeah. And it’s completely amazing. Thank you guys. It
Simone Collins: was
Kirsche: fun.
Malcolm Collins: You’re, you’re amazing. No, I mean, I, I- it’s fun, but also just, like, you’re such a legend.
Aw ... you are really the, the buck at which the cultural tide began to turn. It really
Kirsche: broke- I don’t know if I would say, like, legend, but I, I am very happy that I kind of, I guess, held a stronghold door and made other creators feel more comfortable about coming out and talking about things that they care about, that they believe.
Yeah. And seeing, seeing me... Like, I’ve had so many people say, like, seeing me stand up the way that I did to something like Vice, it made them all feel like maybe we can actually have an effect on something. It is true. And so that, that makes me happy. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: You didn’t just stand up. You clowned on them. You [01:12:00] crushed them.
It was a complete retreat to the extent that I don’t think, like, Vice even has an audience anymore, right? Like, not, not because of you, but I think that these institutions- Mm ... that we grew up thinking of as important, like Vice, we’ve realized that Vice versus Fox Girl- ... Vice is toothless. They have- I
Kirsche: love how some of them tried downplaying it like, “Oh, this can’t be real.
Like, she wrote it so unprofessional.” And I had a lawyer, man, come on,
Simone Collins: dude. Oh my gosh.
Kirsche: I just treated Vice the exact way that they should be treated.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And it worked. And ever since then, there has not been a single, that I’m aware of, successful cancellation of a right-wing internet figure th- that- that was, that was the last of it.
That was
Simone Collins: the last- It was the turning point. It was the turning point. It was, it was
Malcolm Collins: huge Like it, it never ha- do you know how f*****g crazy that is? Like, obviously Elon buying Twitter had a huge effect on this, right?
Kirsche: And I, I also love, like, the, the wave of encouragement that came after [01:13:00] that. Yeah Like, as we’ve seen with like Advanced GG dropping Rev and Straub.
Any time Advanced GG tries to post something- ... everyone just inundates them with like, “Why would anyone work with you when you just drop your creators in the face of a cancel mob, and you keep on other people who harass others, like, objectively?”
Malcolm Collins: And I love wh- when you look at individuals like Rev and Straub, that’s the other thing I really love about the culture that’s come out of this.
And how it’s affected right-wing culture is I think for a while we weren’t sure whether the new version of right-wing culture was actually accepting of people who are, like, different and weird as long as they ch- are, are, are part of our larger... And then, you know, I think Anna Valens affirmed, you know, you and Leaflet for the mainstream wife right audience.
And then GamerSupps affirms Rev. Like, Rev genuine- I think for a long time a lot of people on the right were like, “I don’t know, it’s like an anime, vampire- Well, Gamer- ... all these” GamerSupps
Kirsche: is different from Advanced GG.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, wait, sorry. Advanced GG. Sorry. I know that
Kirsche: they’re all pretty weird and stuff. Yeah.
Advanced [01:14:00] GG were the ones who dropped, who dropped Rev and Straub just for no reason.
Malcolm Collins: To, but they, they, the, the backlash to that I think really affirmed the, the Rev and Straub for a while. The
Kirsche: change, yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And now it’s like we’re all, like, just, like, nerdy weirdos, right? Like, the, the nerdy weir- And that’s the other thing about the nerdy weirdos, the, the nerd scene.
It’s not even weird. We’re nerds. We’re just f*****g nerds. Is, is, is we are winning this for the right. Like, we don’t have internal fighting with each other. We don’t have any real scandals. We don’t get married in front of the Pope and then randomly- ... cheat on our husband a bunch of times.
Kirsche: Yeah, right?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, like, we are, like, the wholesome part. And we- Mm ... and it’s like, no sh- they’re, the only shots fired I’m aware of is, like, a year ago Rev was annoyed at Knucks about something and then got over it, right? Like, but generally speaking, it’s like none of us ever attack each other. And I really love that wholesome feeling to this.
As well as creators like you [01:15:00] who are significantly larger than us, creators like Knucks who are significantly larger than us doing collabs. It’s such a wholesome feel to a community.
Kirsche: It’s, it’s really nice and I, I, I enjoy that there’s not as much infighting and I wish that Especially when it comes to Bridge stuff.
Like, even, even if other larger right-wing creators don’t wanna talk to me because I’m anime, I wish they would at least showcase the research that I’ve done. Because I think it’s a very important conversation, and it’s very important to show more people.
Malcolm Collins: Okay, so here’s, here’s what I have. So any of our fans who either work at the White House or have connections at the White House I think getting...
Where would you tell them to go for the, the biggest condensed, your research?
Kirsche: My pinned tweet on my Twitter profile is an article of every single source of everything I’ve found researching into Bridge since 2024. The only thing not posted there, because I’m not a journalist, so I don’t know how to go about doing it, is I’ve recorded the monthly meetings Bridge has had, or one of my moderators has when I can’t, [01:16:00] for the last two and a half years.
And I have all of these videos of them saying exactly what they’re gonna be doing, exactly what their plans are, the companies they’re specifically working with, the CEOs and the CMOs and the CFOs that come to these meetings from places like even McCormick, the freaking spice company. Like, I have all of these recordings, and I just, I don’t know what to do with them because I don’t wanna go afoul of, like- Okay, so-
some recording laws- Yeah ... or whatever.
Malcolm Collins: We can also... So I tell our fans, send that to anyone you know. Simone we’ve been, we’ve been asked to speak at the White House before, so we’ve, we’ve done that. And- Oh ... we should reach out to our contact there, Simone, just as a task item. We should reach out to our contact there about this to see if we can get them to look into this at all.
Because it could be an interesting win for them.
I’m connected with them.
Simone Collins: Well, I know,
Kirsche: yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah, it’s- And they’re very big, and they’re often very overwhelmed, so maybe they just need to hear about it from our angle, so we should. Let
Kirsche: me... Maybe, yeah. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: So I think, I think get Heritage Foundation in front of Bridge. We have connections at, like, Claremont and stuff like that, right?
Like we could- Mm-hmm ... reach out.
Kirsche: Yeah, that would be great. I would love to. Like, anybody who’s willing to talk, just give them my Discord. Give me, like, a hundred- Yeah, ‘
Malcolm Collins: cause I, [01:17:00] I remember talking- ... people to contact me ... with Dustin about starting, like, a, a nerd right or new right, like, institutional, like, fund similar to Heritage- Mm-hmm
or something like that, and he’s just like, “I don’t see what benefit.” But at the very least, we should be handing this sort of information to people.
Simone Collins: Well, yeah, because you’ve done, like, reams of research on this. Yeah. Which is invaluable. And so that, like, they could take that and run with it. ‘Cause they have the lawyers, and you did the research, and they can just plug and play.
It’s like, “Oh, look, I can start here, here, and here.” Like, that much- Yeah, exactly ... time.
Kirsche: And, and especially- Do you know who- ... more so that, like, obviously everything in my, my Twitter article is for public consumption, but, like, the, the videos of these internal meetings where they speak freely because they believe no one who doesn’t believe other than them is watching- Yeah
it, it’s insane some of the stuff that they say.
Simone Collins: Gosh.
Malcolm Collins: Oh. Who do we... Who else do we know that could, I, like, I’m thinking who’d be interested in going deep on this. You know, Louise Perry talking with you could be pretty good. She’s got a decent audience. And I think she’d be interested Do, do you know Louise Perry?
Kirsche: I do not.
Simone Collins: She’s based in the UK. [01:18:00] She is one of those, like, I- canaries in the coal
Malcolm Collins: mine She’s, she’s really big. She is in the UK. So, you know, we’re known as like the pronatalist couple. Mm-hmm. Whatever we are to Elon- Mm ... JK Rowling. Yeah. In the same way that like JK Rowling can’t spend all day railing against trans people online, Louise Perry can’t
Does that for her, right? You know? Yeah, yeah. She also goes really deep on a lot of stuff and former leftist and everything like that. Yeah. I mean, a, a lot of our government connections are in the UK because like we’ve been better at infiltrating governments there. Which is- I don’t know why that’s the case.
There’s just, I, I guess, a larger nerd government faction in the UK.
Kirsche: I guess maybe. Yeah. I, I moved back to, like, where I’m from, so I’m back in New England, and I’ve, I’ve been meeting with a lot of like libertarian party and free state party people in New Hampshire, and that gives me, that gives me great, great hope for the future, at least out here.
That’s so wonderful. Which
Malcolm Collins: usually I’m like a doomsday party and hope for the best, but- Oh, I used to live in New Hampshire. I love, I love that stuff. Yeah, we, we’ve done we’ve done speaking at [01:19:00] some of that, and we’ve been asked to come speak at something in New Hampshire. Do you know what it is, Simone, the group?
They wanna fly us out.
Simone Collins: H- have you spoken with them? Like, some new s- society and they reached out on X, and I can’t remember the name. I can look it up really fast, but like... yeah. I know there are a lot of, like, free state related societies that it’s like a membership based private society.
Kirsche: Heck yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But yeah, awesome. This has been so great. And I’m gonna get building those things, and hopefully I can have them done in a couple weeks.
Kirsche: And I will try to get screenshots of the SE backend and the GamerSupps gifting platform.
Great,
Malcolm Collins: great. Amazing. I’ll try to mimic, I’ll try to mimic them. Just so you know our system runs on Stripe, so that would be the payment processor.
Kirsche: That makes sense. That makes sense. I think God, what’s it called? Sidescrollers plus Locals, I think they also run on Stripe.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, oh, a- also important for you to know, the reason I use Stripe is because you can use Stripe with Privacy.
Mm-hmm. Privacy is a app that you can sign into that creates- Mm ... a fake one-time use credit card using your credit card that [01:20:00] uses a fake name and address. That’s pretty cool. So if people wanna be, like, totally anonymous, even to me, that can be done.
Kirsche: That’s pretty neat.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. All right. Well- Well,
Kirsche: all right
Malcolm Collins: spectacular. Have a wonderful day.
Kirsche: You too. Thank you again for having me on, and bye bye.
Speaker 6: Okay, so you wanted to show the fans the toys that you bought?
Yeah
All of the places that are, that are trying to destroy the United States of America, or just trying to, or just trying to shoot a nuclear bomb at, at America. Okay? So Iran, for sure, right? Iran. What about China or Europe? Who do you, who do you dislike more?[01:21:00]
So you’re going to handle both China and Europe?
Octavian Collins: And, and on, and on both islands there will be Chinook helicopters drop, dropping snipers to shoot people- ... very fiercely and, and very invisible. Wait, only, only the bad people or the civilians too? Oh, only the bad military people. Or- But the civilians-
Speaker 6: And what are you gonna do with the civilians after you get rid of the military people?
Oh, so you’ll, you’ll bring freedom to China and [01:22:00] Europe?
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Malcolm Collins breaks down the Iran conflict and the Trump administration’s surprising diplomatic masterstroke that most pundits on both left and right completely misunderstood. Instead of “giving away money” or weakness, the deal creates powerful economic incentives and on-the-ground leverage from Iran’s angry neighbors (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, etc.) that makes cheating far more dangerous than the weak Obama deal.
We also discuss why boots-on-the-ground predictions failed, Israel’s role, the collapse of Iran’s military and leadership, and the long-term strategic wins for America. Later in the episode, Malcolm makes a provocative case for allowing Sharia law applied specifically to Muslim communities in the West as a way to reduce crime, create a forcing function on integration, and let communities see the real preferences of high-fertility Islamic subgroups.
A raw, high-signal conversation that challenges mainstream narratives on both foreign policy and domestic cultural issues.
Show Notes
Headlines on June 17th
https://drudgereport.com/
OBAMA DEAL BETTER?
TRUMP HUMILIATION
MAGA HAWK MUTINY
TEXT LEAKS
NY Times Above the Fold on Iran:
Live Updates: Trump Speaks at G7 Sumit After Renewing Threats on Iran https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/06/17/world/g7-summit-trump-france
Stars of Israel’s TV Channel for Bibi Fans Turn on Trump https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/17/world/middleeast/israel-channel-14-trump-criticism.html
You have to click through on NY Times to get any “what’s going on with negotiations” update, and the headline is: What to Know About the U.S.-Iran Framework Agreement: The full text of the deal that could pave the way to ending the war has not been published. Initial details suggest that it defers the most contentious issues.
Generally, from only scanning headlines, one gets the impression that Iran may be reaching some sort of conclusion, but it’s one unflattering to the Trump administration.
What has happened as of June 17th
A preliminary framework agreement (memorandum of understanding or MoU) was reached and virtually signed around June 14–15, 2026, between the US and Iran to pause the ongoing conflict.
Key elements (based on public statements and reports; the full text has not been widely released yet):
* Immediate ceasefire extension: Halts military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon. This builds on earlier shaky ceasefires (e.g., from April).
* Reopening the Strait of Hormuz: Iran agrees to clear restrictions/mines; the US lifts its naval blockade of Iranian ports. Shipping has begun resuming, contributing to falling oil prices.
* 60-day negotiation window: For broader issues, primarily Iran’s nuclear program (e.g., enrichment freeze or limits, sanctions relief). A formal signing ceremony is planned for June 19 in Switzerland (or possibly another venue).
* Other reported aspects (with some conflicting claims): Possible phased sanctions relief, asset unfreezing, and a reconstruction fund (potentially $300 billion, mostly from Gulf states/private sources rather than direct US payments).
The key point per Malcolm: The powers surrounding Iran being directly invested in its recovery and improvement, and Iran’s stable future being contingent on not pissing them off.
Primarily Gulf Arab states (Iran’s key neighbors across the Persian Gulf), through a proposed private ~$300 billion Reconstruction and Development Fund, will be involved in Iran’s reconstructed and therefore directly invested in Iran going forward
Details from the Framework Agreement
* The fund is not direct US government money or reparations but a private investment vehicle designed to attract capital for Iran’s postwar recovery (infrastructure, energy, logistics, manufacturing, etc.).
* Gulf states (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, and others in the GCC) are positioned as primary backers or facilitators (”Gulf Coast Coalition”). They were attacked by Iran during the conflict and have a strong incentive for regional stability. Contributions could include loans, credit lines, or direct investments.
* Why these neighbors?
* Economic interdependence: Rebuilding Iran reduces future conflict risks, secures energy routes (e.g., Strait of Hormuz), and opens markets.
* Mediation role: Qatar and Oman played key diplomatic roles; broader GCC involvement aligns with their security and economic goals.
* Already committed: Over half the fund has pledges from companies in Gulf states, Asia, US, etc.
Other international private investors (Asia, Europe, Africa, South America) are involved, but Gulf neighbors are emphasized for their direct stake and proximity.
The fund unlocks only if Iran complies with nuclear limits, inspections, sanctions relief phases, and other terms. Full details await formal signing (expected ~June 19) and implementation. This structure gives neighbors leverage and investment upside in a stable Iran.
What remains pending:
* Israel getting on board: Netanyahu has indicated Israeli forces will not fully withdraw from Lebanon, creating friction.
* How to work out sanctions and rule enforcement going forward: Loose ends on nuclear talks, sanctions, regional proxies, and enforcement. Trump has noted dissatisfaction could lead to resumed action.
* Iran’s future armament: Iran’s nuclear capabilities, ballistic missiles, and broader regional influence are deferred.
Is Iran Less of a Threat Today?
Yes.
Various ways Iran is nerfed:
* Nuclear Program Setbacks:
* US/Israeli strikes heavily damaged key enrichment facilities
* (Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan) and related infrastructure.
* While Iran retains some highly enriched uranium stockpiles and knowledge (underground elements were hard to fully destroy), its ability to rapidly advance toward a weapon has been delayed by months to a year or more.
* The framework agreement includes commitments to non-proliferation and further talks on limits, reducing near-term breakout risk.
* Ballistic Missiles and Conventional Forces:
* Large portions of Iran’s missile launchers, production facilities, air defenses, naval assets, and drone capabilities were destroyed or degraded.
* This limits its ability to project power, threaten US assets/bases, or sustain prolonged attacks.
* Proxy responses (e.g., from Hezbollah, Houthis) were limited and ineffective in shifting the balance.
* Economic and Logistical Pressure:
* The conflict devastated Iran’s economy and defense industrial base. The recent agreement reopens the Strait of Hormuz (previously restricted by Iran, causing global oil disruptions) and lifts the US naval blockade, but under monitored terms with sanctions relief tied to compliance. This reduces Iran’s leverage via energy chokepoints while exposing it to ongoing oversight.
* Leadership and Regime Strain:
* Strikes targeted senior figures, command structures, and internal security (e.g., Basij bases), contributing to morale issues, desertions, and recruitment problems.
* The regime survived but is in a more defensive, weakened posture.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today, and this is one of those days where I just need to be like- Everybody doesn’t seem to understand what happened at all, and I’m talking about on both the left and the right with this current deal with Iran, which is actually one of the more brilliant negotiated deals that I’ve seen maybe in the past 100 years in terms of us getting pretty much everything that we really want.
And it’s shocking to me that you keep hearing, well, outright false claims that we’re giving them money, which we’re not. But money is involved, but in a way that really, really matters, and in a way that has a lot more teeth than the Obama deal did which is another thing that people are getting really wrong.
So a bit of context, because I- I don’t even know if you fully understand, and I’m gonna get the, the gist of this out of the gate. The big problem we have with Iran and wanting to pull out of the war, right, is that Iran, due to something called a Mosaic Defense Force, [00:01:00] essentially split into independent warlords who don’t exactly follow what’s coming from the top.
We know this because there was one instance where the president said that he apologized for all the strikes on other countries that are their allies presumably, and then the, a few days later he was like, “I, I, I didn’t say... I didn’t mean that. We’re not even doing that.” You know, which implied that one, they’re not listening to him, and two, the independent warlords have more power than he does in this arrangement, because he had to back down from this position.
So this has led to a scenario where even when we do negotiate with people at the top, right? They can then th- they need to be able to, and in a, in a strong and forceful way, have a reason to tell all the people below, “Follow along and stay in line.” Right? And then we have the secondary problem with Iran, which is even if you make a deal with them like Obama did, they basically just ignore it, like they did with the Obama deal.
Because the enforcement of that deal was that you know, the [00:02:00] UN or whatever would send its inspectors in, and Iran just wouldn’t show the inspectors the, the places where this is at, freaking obviously, right? Like we’re, how are they gonna figure that out, right? So that creates a huge negative incentive.
Speaker: Mr. Eel, I was supposed to be allowed to inspect your palace today, and your guards won’t let me into certain areas. Hans, Hans, Hans, we’ve been through this a dozen times. I don’t have any weapons of mass destruction..
I’m sorry, but the UN must be firm with you. Let me see your whole palace or else.
Speaker 2: Or else what?
Speaker: Or else we will be very, very angry with you, and we will write you a letter telling you how angry we are.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. So functionally, what Trump created was a scenario in which and Iran helped him do this. They made a number of enormous miscalculations that made this deal possible that is just so bad for Iran and people don’t get it at all. So, [00:03:00] the miscalculation, the big one that they made that is almost baffling unless you understand that there were rogue actors within the country o- operating this Mosaic Defense Force and just basically trying to The, the, the reason why they were sending more missiles at, like, Qatar and the UAE and Saudi Arabia and, like, their, their freaking allies than even Oman, who’s been one of their closest allies forever, than Israel, is because that didn’t get you scorecards in the, in the battleship of the dictators, right?
And so this led them to attack. A- and keep in mind, by the way, what the, the right grifters who lie to you all the time, like the anti-Israel right grifters and the leftist said it this word, they said, “This is gonna end up with boots on the ground, huge, hundreds of thousands of American soldiers dying in Iran, that the stock markets are gonna crash,” highest they’ve ever been.
That oil is gonna go to $200 a barrel. Did not happen. You know, and, and when I came out here with all of this, and I told you where I thought this war was gonna go, I’ve been pretty much exactly accurate. Okay? Yeah. So keep this in mind when you’re thinking of your [00:04:00] sources and where you take, like, interest- like, your information from, right?
Right. Because some people are manipulating you and playing you for stupid. But anyway, so it ended up with a scenario where- A lot of these countries have historically ... Well, they were in conflict. Like, Saudi Arabia’s not Iran’s ally. Like, they, they do hate each other. But other players like Qatar was.
Qatar is where, like, Al Jazeera is, which is basically Iran’s global mouthpiece. Yeah ... the reason why Qatar is so close with Iran is because they share the gas field that is the basis of all of Qatar’s wealth. This is the natural gas field. And Iran and Qatar have to get along otherwise they end up fighting in a way that would be mutually destructive.
But now even Qatar doesn’t like them because Iran bombed the main refining facility of Qatar. So- Okay ... all of these other Middle Eastern countries really hate, hate Iran’s guts now. And what they’re saying under the table is, “We want what Israel wants. We want Iran a failed state or functionally eradicated,” okay?
Simone Collins: Right,
Malcolm Collins: yeah. Trump doesn’t want this. This would cause a major refugee [00:05:00] crisis and it has- Yeah, yeah ... some other negative externalities. Israel, this is Israel’s endgame, I think. But, you know, Israel is at the moment partially serving us. They’re doing some stuff with Hezbollah. I think Trump secretly approves it.
We’ll get to that in a second. But- Okay ... so Iran closes down the strai- the strait. We’ve said if, in terms of large geopolitical players, we point out that that basically only helps the United States. While it may hurt us economically in the short term, like, like, in an absolute sense, in a relative sense against all other parts of the world no country on Earth is helped more than the United States by a shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz.
Because we produce all of the stuff that comes out of there, and are exporters of it, and just basically captured Venezuela, which is one of the other major exporters of it. And so, like, that just makes the value of all that stuff that we own and export and is a major part of our economy go up. And so the people who get hurt by that, as I’ve said, are Europe and China primarily, China the most.
And, and some other East Asian countries. But nobody gets hurt by this [00:06:00] more than who, Simone? Who gets hurt the most by a closure of the Strait of Hormuz?
Simone Collins: Europe, the EU, right? No. China.
Malcolm Collins: It closes ... uAE- Russia ... Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.
Simone Collins: Because- Oh, for this, their oil sales ...
Malcolm Collins: they can’t export their main product if that strait is closed.
And Saudi Arabia has some other ports they can use, but, but minor stuff there. Okay? So all of these people, one, hate Iran’s guts right now. They want Iran functionally eliminated long-term. And th- because keep in mind they’re, it, most of them are a different branch of Islam and the, nobody hates each other more than the two branches of Islam, right?
Those are the two big... y- you think they hate the Jews, you know, they’re, they’re, they’re, they’re chomping at the bit to g- go at each other. But anyway, so, they, Iran pretty isolated, right? And this is why Iran, in terms of how they built out their global power projection, had to do it through terrorist networks rather than through alliances with states like the Saudi Arabians did.
So, we [00:07:00] wanna get this strait open, but there’s this Mosaic Defense Force saying, “And we don’t really care that much.” Like, we don’t want the US to put a bunch of money in getting this open. Okay?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: So who is most motivated to get the strait open? The other powers in the Middle East right now. So what did the deal functionally do?
It did two things simultaneously that have people pissed off. Both of them are kind of irrelevant. One is releasing Iran’s frozen funds. For people who act like this is us giving Iran money, you guys have the mentality of Josh of Bricks and Minifigs thinking he’s giving the guy a big gift by giving him his Legos back.
It’s like, no, you f*****g seized those Legos. You’re not doing some big f*****g favor by giving them their own Legos back. You just seized them because they had diplomatic sanctions on them. Right? So that’s really irrelevant, and it wasn’t even that much money. It’s like $20 billion or something like that
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: The $300 billion deal [00:08:00] is what everybody is talking about.
Simone Collins: Yes.
Malcolm Collins: This has nothing to do with US assets. No- nobody in the US is involved in this deal. Okay. So what is actually happening with this deal? What this does is it allows for up to 300 million, which by the way a lot of people... Billion. A lot of people are leaving the up to out of investment.
Keep in mind this is not like a donation. This is not for infrastructure. This is for direct investment by all of these countries that Iran just pissed off inside of Iran. All right? So you’ve gotta keep in mind what that functionally means is going to happen in Iran. All right? So a bunch of countries now that want Iran gone in the long term wouldn’t want something like this again, and would want to be able to act against Iran with more force if this happened again, now basically have a blank slate to build up private operations with private militias, [00:09:00] private everything like that all throughout Iran.
And not just all throughout Iran, but at every key economic node of Iran, because what are these powers going to be investing in? If the UAE, if Saudi Arabia just got a bunch of billions of dollars to invest in Iran, what are they gonna be investing sprucing up? What are they gonna b- be buying? Oil.
Yeah. Oil creation assets, oil creation facilities. And they have a lot of experience in making these very defensible once they get them in place, right? Sure. This actually puts Iran in a terrible position long term, but it’s worse than that for Iran. Because now what they’re saying is, “Okay, I know that you have this Mosaic Defense Force which is going to want to, like, show off and just randomly attack ships and blah blah blah blah blah,” right?
But, this is such a potential boon to the future of Iran because it is still money flowing in, it is still dollars going to [00:10:00] Iranians at the end of the day who will be employed at these facilities, right? That there’s a reason to say, “Hey, we actually lose something very big, this continued investment, if we continue to act bad.”
So now they have an active reason to not do the bad thing with assets on the ground. Now this gets very, very different than the deal that Obama put into place. Because the deal that Obama put into place was sort of like, “We’ll have bureaucrats go there and check your numbers and see whatever,” right?
The, and the bureaucrats don’t really even have a vested interest in making sure Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons. Now under the Trump deal, which is interesting because the Trump deal on its surface feels like it has a lot fewer fangs in it. But because it’s directly tied to these new assets within Iran owned by all of these countries around Iran, right?
Mm. It is way harder for Iran to do two things. One, attempt to nationalize this [00:11:00] stuff. If Iran attempts to nationalize this stuff, they’ve now pissed off every country around them, and given countries that for a long time have wanted to seriously kick butt on Iran a casus belli for a war. And a casus belli for a war that even if the United States doesn’t enter, Israel certainly will, because Israel’s been waiting to do this forever.
And they now know that Israel versus Iran looks really bad on the Iranian side.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: So functionally in terms of, like, the actual motivations that Iran has in terms of moving forwards, this is a pretty powerful deal. Now, this isn’t to say that, you know, Iran could be so much of a failed state at this point that they just can’t control their military, that their military decides to go out there, strike random ships, whatever.
At that point, we’ll see what ends up happening. I’m not saying that that won’t end up happening, because that could happen. The other big hitch in this is that Hezbollah s- is still sending missiles at Israel. So Israel decides you know, because they’re trying to, [00:12:00] to provoke Israel, basically. They don’t, they don’t want this to end, right?
Like, a lot of, a lot of these other Iran state actors don’t want this to end. This, these are the, the guys in Lebanon. By the way, if you’re like, “Oh, w- w- killing innocents in Lebanon, how could this happen?” I wanna give you a a just, just a, an overview of Lebanon’s history for people who aren’t aware of it.
So, if you go back to the 1895 census that we have, okay? Okay ... lebanon was 80% Christian. They were, by 1930- Holy,
Simone Collins: wait, what kind of Christian? Catholic?
Malcolm Collins: I think Catholic. Or they might’ve been an Eastern Orthodox branch.
Oh. Or 79% Christian. Okay?
Simone Collins: Whoa.
Speaker 3: They were Catholics, it turns out, which makes all of the de-sucking that the Pope did and Vatican II did not long after this look particularly ghoulish
Malcolm Collins: You go to today what, what is, what is Lebanon today?
28% Christian. You wanna know what happened to, to, to their Christian population?
Simone Collins: What?
Malcolm Collins: Well, mass [00:13:00] murdered. So, specifically we have things like the Damascus massacres, where 5,000 to 12,000 Christians were, like, just pulled out of churches and monasteries and murdered in the streets. And then you have the Lebanon Civil War.
Simone Collins: By whom? Like, what is, what, what contingent was so anti-Christian?
Malcolm Collins: Muslims
Simone Collins: Okay, great. Great, great. Okay,
Malcolm Collins: Muslims. Yeah, I think people, like, when people are like, “But a Jew spit on a nun once.” And it’s like, bro, it’s a completely different scale. A Jew - besmirched a statue of Jesus. It’s like, what, what are you, what are you on about?
Speaker 5: The one that always gets me when people are like, “Did you know that Israel bombed a, a church in Gaza?” And I’m like, “Okay, how many people were attending that church?” It’s like, “Well, there was like three or four.” And it’s like, “Uh-huh, and there used to be hundreds. What happened to them? What happened to them?”
Oh, you, you, you, you, are you willingly unaware or are you just like you like cucking yourself? Because these people, like it’s, it’s worse than being cucked. [00:14:00] It’s like you’re actively out there seeing somebody murder your countrymen, your children, your wife, and you’re like stanning them
Speaker 6: I am fairly confident that these people have some weird NTR fetish and that we’re gonna find out one day when Nick’s, , folder leaks that that was his thing all along
Speaker 4: And for those who are unaware, , if you’re like, “Well, but Jews I guess functionally do the same thing because they vote Democrat,” it’s like actually Orthodox Jews, the ones having kids, the ones who will be represented in the future, the ones we’ll be partnered with long-term in Israel, , they vote Republican overwhelmingly.
So much so that they are one of the key reasons we win the swing state of Florida and have moved that into the easy area to win for the Republican Party
Malcolm Collins: And note here, there are decent Muslims, right? But a lot of them, and the Muslims that have cultural power in Lebanon right now are not [00:15:00] that group. Okay? Specifically Hezbollah, which is essentially holding the country hostage. For 40 years, Israel has told the, the government in Lebanon, “Stop these people on your borders just shind- sending missiles into our country.”
They haven’t done it, so Israel says, “Okay, we’re gonna handle it. We’re gonna, we’re gonna get this. We have greater Israel. Let’s, let’s...” You know? If, if they get rid of the Christians in Lebanon, you know what? Greater Israel all the way. Make it Jewish. I don’t care, right? But Iran wants to include a protection for Hezbollah, or Lebanon in their minds in this because they don’t wanna lose the last state asset that they really have, which is really in tatters anyway at this point because of the pager bombings and stuff like this.
But Israel is saying to Trump, “We’re not gonna do this.” And they go in and they attack Damascus. Which I under- I mean, from their interests, they really don’t want this to happen. They, there have been right-wing Israeli pundits that you can find just railing about the peace deal. Because again, Israel’s best interest is the complete destruction of the [00:16:00] Iranian state.
Simone Collins: Uh-huh.
Malcolm Collins: They do not care long term-
Simone Collins: Scorched earth, nothing there, yeah. Which is-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ... yeah Destroy all their economic assets. Not
Simone Collins: great. I mean-
Malcolm Collins: Anything like that.
Simone Collins: Yeah. No. That’s not what we want. No.
Malcolm Collins: And that’s generally not what America wants. No. So, so you could say, okay, so why is Trump not being harder on Israel, just saying they’re being stupid, basically?
I think it’s because he wants them to do this. So the important thing to remember with the deal-
Simone Collins: Okay ...
Malcolm Collins: is that you need to make it look like you’re doing a lot in terms of your part of the deal. Sure. If Trump can go and talk Israel down and get Israel to get out-
Simone Collins: Oh ...
Malcolm Collins: while this is completely- He
Simone Collins: has more leverage
Malcolm Collins: active. Yeah, he has way more leverage in the negotiations. It’s like, “Look, they don’t wanna do this. I’m trying to get them to do this,” right? It’s, it’s really a
Simone Collins: lot- It’s good cop, bad cop. I- yeah. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So by the way, is this at what you understood of what was happening, or were you just completely with me?
Simone Collins: No, no. My understanding was allegedly there are [00:17:00] talks but this doesn’t do anything to stop any long-term nuclear threat from Iran. Like, yes, we’ve decimated their nuclear capacity, but within a year they could be back up and running. Yes, we’ve ruined, you know, their lower tech ballistic missiles and stuff, but sure, they could just buy new ones.
And this- ... this alleged a- agreement or plans for an agreement, they’re just plans. W- no one has seen the full written agreement. Nothing has been agreed to formally. And by the way, Israel doesn’t wanna back out of Lebanon and who knows what’s gonna happen with Iran? It’s all fragmented. You can’t even get it to agree in the first place.
So basically, if you look at what, I think, the surface of mainstream media and general reporting tells you, nothing is happening. This war is terrible. We’ve wasted money. We’re no better off than we used to be, and-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, so that’s just basically- ... Trump
Simone Collins: is embarrassed ...
Malcolm Collins: completely wrong at every single point.
So first of all, remember how I said that, like, we [00:18:00] can’t get Iran to stop making nukes by sending bureaucrats in? Yeah. You know what, what,
Simone Collins: and- Yeah. No, that’s, it’s, it’s like telling, it’s like telling our kids, like, “Don’t do this. It’s against the rules. You’ll get a timeout.”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: And you just have, you have to change the incentives.
Everything’s incentives, not punishments.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So you- You it, a, well, no, punishments matter too. What, Iran functionally and finally got punished for decades of flagrantly ignoring our they almost have a nuke freak-out, right? By this lore. And people were like, “Oh, it’s always been they almost have a nuke.”
And it’s like, yeah, and they almost got it multiple times. And then we did Stuxnet, and Iran, Israel did Stuxnet, which was really clever, by the way. Again, Jews and their sneak stat. They’re just like speccing into a race with like a plus 25 to sneak. Like, the Hezbollah bombings were crazy. Stuxnet, if you’re not familiar with this, it was a completely offline centrifuge, and they ended up tricking somebody [00:19:00] into taking a USB drive, putting it into the completely offline device, and then destroying this super expensive centrifuge automatically.
Like, the mechanical parts of it. That is the wildest thing I’ve ever heard of in terms of... That’s, that’s some, that’s some Jewery right there. That’s,
Simone Collins: that’s- Next, next level ...
Malcolm Collins: cucking Jew. But anyway, so, Stuxnet set them way back. Like, over and over again, they get set back. They get set back. They get set back.
And now They almost had it finally. And they were basically telling us that. They go, “We have enough to make, I think it was, what? 25 nukes within two months they said, or something like that. Like, like basically they’re just like, “Yeah, we’ve pre-refined it.” There’s no, there’s no reason to have it refined to this amount other than military-grade weapons, and it only takes a few weeks to get it from the amount of refinement they had to nuclear grade and then use it, right?
Mm-hmm. So they’re basically saying, “Yeah, we, we have the capability to nuke.” They’re a country that regularly trans- death to America at political events. This is not a controversial statement there. That’s the party line. [00:20:00] That’s, that’s in the national charter. And that’s obviously a threat to America, right?
Especially given that they have even recently funded you know, the killings of 250 Marines at one of our embassies through, through Hezbollah, right? Like, they, they are willing to nuke American assets, right? Like, they’d probably start with the Jews, but, but you know, we’d, you know, be on the list.
In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if they tried to do an Israel America at the same time sort of thing, just as like a big show of force and how great they are and try to... and of course, Hasan Piker and all the leftists at universities, even if it was Manhattan being nuked, would still be doing these big parades, ‘cause that’s how they are these days.
But, so they almost get the n- the, this material, and it’s like what can we do at this point, right? The only thing we can really do is bomb their military into the Stone Age, and you look at what we were able to achieve with this. We destroyed basically all of their military assets. Their entire navy, which was, by the way, I think four exercises of British Navy,
Simone Collins: Was it really?
Oh, I don’t remember- Yeah, yeah, yeah ... hearing about a big navy.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Wow. Well, it’s more that Britain has a super small navy [00:21:00] now.
Simone Collins: There’s that.
Malcolm Collins: Super small and incompetent. But anyway that’s at the bottom, that’s at the bottom of the, the, the ocean now or the, the sea there. But anyway, so we got rid of their navy, we got rid of a lot of their land assets.
We really hurt them in terms of their ordinance stockpiles that they have access to. And but, yes, they can restock, but in the meantime, we also did a lot of physical destruction to nuclear facilities that, that we’re aware of. But more than all of that, we really up the country’s leadership organization.
Like we basically killed Two generations of leadership. Well, not we. They, the Israelis are way better at the targeted killing stuff. We helped, okay? We, we threw a few bombs in there, but they, If you look at the, the, the level of the destruction that happened within the leadership of Iran it’s, it’s genuinely astonishing, and it’s gonna be very hard for them to bounce back from this.
Mm-hmm ... w- when you consider that, as well as the asset damage. And anything that looks like, [00:22:00] from the perspective of other Middle Easterners, re-arming themselves is gonna be bad, and I think that they, they... because they, they’ll withdraw the money. And this is where it gets really good, because the thing that I think that we’ve learned in the United States more broadly, and I think this is what we should learn in the UK, I think this is something that we need to, to come away with, is there was a, the, the, the one of the heads of Qatar, he’s got this speech where he’s talking about how the United States and Europe, he specifically, he was calling out here Europe, he goes, “We’re gonna have to deal with, in the next generation, many a Muslim extremist attacks,” because Europe is not dealing with its Muslim extremists, right?
Like, they are, as we’ve seen in recent episodes, there’ll be, like, a gang rape, and the, the kid, the minors who did it, so they can say, “Oh, it’s not a big deal,” they, they got fines of, like, community service. They didn’t even get jail time for it. They posted it on Snapchat live. Like, the, the level of degradation, and with the new files, which we’re not gonna cover, by the way, of all the grooming gangs, was so much worse than anyone thought.
And they were [00:23:00] 98% Muslim, turns out. So much worse than anyone thought that, that, And these also, these groups target Muslim communities as well. Like, keep that in mind, right? Like, Absolutely horrifying that this has been al- allowed to metastasize. And the, the guy in Qatar’s like, “You and America need to d- need to deal with this.
You and y- Europe need to deal with this.” And when they say deal with it in Qatar, what they mean is drag them out in the street and chop their heads off. Okay? And this is where I’m gonna say something a little controversial. I think we should allow for Sharia law in the UK and in the US applied to Muslim communities.
Oh. So, so here how this works. Okay. I think that we should still be subject to all of the other laws of our country, but in addition to the other laws of the country, if Sharia law would ever have a harsher punishment than the country’s laws, then the Sharia law punishment is applied to any practicing Muslim.
And this is done at the level of local Muslim councils. So for [00:24:00] example, what would happen to these men under Sharia law? The smallest fine that they would’ve had to pay, the smallest thing that may have happened to them as an unmarried man involved in a grape is 100 whip lashes from a whip.
If you’re unfamiliar with what 100... That’s, that’s what Johnny Rico was given for accidentally leading to one of his teammates being killed in a a live fire exercise in Starship Trooper. That is a brutal thing to do to someone.
Speaker 8: I was wrong. The Johnny Rico scene is only 10 lashes for an example of how extreme Sharia law is compared to other, , legal systems. , Just in case you’re wondering how many lashes is generally considered fatal, in ancient Roman and Jewish tradition, 40 lashes was often seen as the point where death became likely, hence the common practice of limiting it to 39 lashes to avoid accidentally killing.
In British military flogging, ,. A famous case in 1846 involved a soldier dying after 150 lashes. Sentences were later reduced to 50 or fewer. A Russian knout, , far [00:25:00] deadlier.
100 lashes were typically fatal. The heavy wire-reinforced tool could break bones in the spine, with some deaths reported as few as 20 strokes. , Modern judicial flogging in the Middle East, sentences of 50 to 100 lashes are common and often survived without serious injury, though deaths occur
, examples include a boy dying after 85 lashes due to a mishit
Speaker 7: recruit trainee John Rico is sentenced to administrative punishment Ten lashes Carry out the sentence
Speaker 9: So if we had Sharia law implemented for Muslims in the West, , and you had something like this gang rape and then they posted on, , you know, X or whatever, , we know it was a Snapchat, you know, you would have ended up with maybe a quarter of these kids just being whipped to death in public. And I [00:26:00] think that would be a very strong deterrent, , both to importing more, , Muslims who want this to be the punishment for everyone and for the Muslim population in these countries.
Speaker 10: Just a few logistical points if you’re confused as to, “Oh, well, how do you determine who’s a Muslim?” Right? The, the answer is easy. It’s by, , mosque,
Records. , Basically you are, , if you go to a mosque and that mosque, , ascribes to Sharia law, then you are put on the records as being a Muslim who ascribes to Sharia law, right? Like, it would be very, very simple. And if you are a kid under 18, , somebody who goes to one of the mosques, then you are counted as on those records
Speaker 11: And if you’re like, “Oh, but that’s so inhumane,” you understand that this is what will become the law of the land in these countries if we allow current demographics to play out. , If you look at the United States, , the Center of Security Policy poll, , found that fifty-one percent of [00:27:00] American Muslims thought that Sharia courts should be allowed in the United States.
, A twenty-twenty-four Heritage Foundation -- poll found thirty-nine percent of Muslims in the United States thought that Sharia law should be the law of the land. Um, in the UK, we have polls ranging from, , forty-three percent., There was a two-thousand-and-sixteen poll, Policy Exchange IMC, , forty-one percent showed it.
In twenty-twenty-four, Henry Jackson Society showed thirty-two percent wanting it. And you can be like, “Well, this isn’t the majority,” or, “It’s only the edge majority in some cases,” but the ones who want it are having vastly more kids than the ones who don’t want it, so they will be the majority of the population in the future.
If you’re like, “Oh, this is... How could you do this? This is mon-” You’ve gotta understand, if you do nothing, if you just allow things to play out, this is the way people of the future will be tried in these countries. So you are, through not allowing this to be engaged with, causing it to be engaged with at a much larger level in the future based on current statistical [00:28:00] trends.
Speaker 13: And again, I have nothing against Muslims or Islam or anything like that. , I just think that there is a version of Islam that is leading to much higher birth rates within certain parts of the community, , that I do find distasteful, the same way I find certain versions of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community that are extremely unproductive, , distasteful.
, And I think that when we look at this version being the high fertility version, this version being the version that’s been resistant to the low fertility aspects of Western culture, , and is, is not integrating, , because the ones who do integrate don’t have as many kids, , that, , , we see many people in the West not understand what the real long-term implications is if they become a majority anywhere.
, And I think that through changing the law system to the one that they want, the one that they’re asking for, for the members on their mosque rolls, , that could help people grok that when they say they want these sorts of punishments, they’re serious about it.
Malcolm Collins: On the high end, depending on which version of Sharia law you’re, you’re looking at, that would be a [00:29:00] public crucifixion.
Now you wanna see gang grape stop really quickly in Muslim neighborhoods? Start having teenagers being publicly crucified in those neighborhoods in Britain, and it’s gonna stop mighty fast.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: A- and better- Well,
Simone Collins: you make a fair point that, like, maybe there’s a lack of Sharia law at play among communities
Malcolm Collins: that are- These people co-evolved with these incredibly harsh punishments, right?
Right. Like, we, we point out that, like, m- different people evolved alongside different social norms, and when you take them and put them in a completely different set of social norms their behavior... Like evolution affects personality, behavior, how you relate to things, and humans have undergone an enormous amount of recent sociological evolutionary pressure.
Mm-hmm ... and if you take somebody who’s used to these incredibly strict rules that they use in places like the UAE, and Qatar, and, and Iran, and Saudi Arabia, right? Like, all of these countries have incredibly harsh punishments. Whenever you have a Muslim country that actually has a degree of [00:30:00] law and order- it’s because they are applying these punishments as they should be applied.
So I’m coming up that I’m for Sharia law going forward, just only applied to the Muslim community. And, and they can’t say, “Well, this Muslim did something and it doesn’t violate Sharia law.” If secular law ever give the punishment worse than Sharia law, then the secular law punishment a- applies.
Simone Collins: Well, I mean, I’m in, I’m in favor of any religion’s laws being properly enforced.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I know, but they’re, you’re not even legally... I mean, the, the other thing, if it’s a married man who, who grapes someone in Sharia law, that, that’s just a stoning anywhere. That’s the minimum you can get. They don’t even allow us to stone Muslims in, in the United States or the UK. Like, it’s their own law that they should be stoned.
Let’s f- let their people stone them, you know? And I think, the second thing I think, is I think that pretty soon once we kill-
Simone Collins: Well, okay, sorry. Just to, to- criticize this approach, then you’re also saying that honor killings are okay of young women who have been assaulted. And that’s-
Malcolm Collins: That’s actually not Sharia law
super not
Simone Collins: [00:31:00] cool, right?
Malcolm Collins: That’s not... That’s explicitly in violation of Sharia law.
Simone Collins: It is?
Malcolm Collins: It is. It is. In Sharia law, the woman who is raped, it... Now, there have been local customs where this has been applied. Okay. But Sharia law itself is very explicit that the woman is innocent.
Simone Collins: What about a woman who’s just being slutty, let’s say, by their standards?
Oh,
Malcolm Collins: well, you know, maybe we can let them handle... Maybe we could create some negative externalities for that behavior as well. Okay. But what I think is there’s the secondary benefit to this. One, Muslims
Simone Collins: believe- Now, we, we spend all this time around, like, very progressive people, so I’m just hearing them say, “So Malcolm, you believe that a young lady who chooses to be sexually intimate with someone, possibly someone who emotionally manipulated her at a time in which she’s very emotionally vulnerable and immature, that she should be stoned to death if she chooses to become sexually active before getting married as a teenager?”
Malcolm Collins: Absolutely.
Simone Collins: Are you saying that?
Malcolm Collins: Because there are- Oh, my God ... a number of positive effects of this for society. Okay. The first, we give the [00:32:00] Muslims what they want. The ma- majority of Muslims in the UK want Sharia law- Mm-hmm ... at this point, right? Mm-hmm. In the United States, I think it’s 36% of Muslims. So many Muslim communities want this, right?
Simone Collins: That’s a minority, but okay.
Malcolm Collins: No, in the, in the UK it’s a majority.
, I went through the statistics above listing the polls, but actually in one poll it’s the majority in the US as well
Speaker 12: And as I said, it’s also somewhat irrelevant because the ones who believe this are the ones who have demonstrably more kids, probably about double the rate of kids. And so they are the ones who will be represented in future populations
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: And in the US it might be a majority. Now, I need to double check, but yeah.
Simone Collins: I feel like this needs to be opt-in. You know, you have to, like, waive your- No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Not
Malcolm Collins: an opt-in for the Muslim communities who have their own mosque and everything like that.
Okay, so, so now you have two-
Simone Collins: How would this be practically enforced? Like, let’s say-
Malcolm Collins: It would be,
Simone Collins: Enforced by Sharia law ... my parents were Muslim, but I’m not. Like, I’m an, I’m an atheist wiccan whose parents are Muslim. What laws apply? I ha- I’ve chosen- So, so- ... to not opt into that
Malcolm Collins: culture ... so it is applied...
First of all, if you’re an atheist wiccan whose parents [00:33:00] are Muslim, you’re an apostate and Sharia law says you should be killed.
Simone Collins: Oh, my God. So,
Malcolm Collins: That, by the way... So let’s talk about why this is such a positive thing, why this would
Simone Collins: be such a positive thing to allow. Yes. Why is this such a positive thing?
Malcolm Collins: First, you give the Muslims what they want. Second, the Muslims who don’t want this would now have a very strong reason to deconvert, right? So what you say is basically you have the right to deconvert from Islam, and the state will protect you after the age of 18. If at the age of 18 you want to deconvert you can deconvert from Islam, and you no longer need to play in this system, and the state will protect you and maybe even open up shelters for people who are doing this specifically.
I, I’d be okay with state funding that, okay? The-
Simone Collins: Oh, for like shelters of a minor who wants to escape?
Malcolm Collins: I said 18 If you’re a minor, in Islamic law, the parents kill you if you leave Islam, okay?
Simone Collins: Oh my God. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: But the secondary benefit to this, I think minors should have to follow the laws and religion of their parents.
Absolutely. If their parents are paying to support them, [00:34:00] they’re n- the state’s not paying to support them. I mean, in a lot of these Muslim cases they are, let’s be honest, but let’s just say the parents, right? So the second thing, okay, is that visibly, now all of a sudden people in the UK, the leftists in the UK, the, the leftists in America have to visually see that the group that they’re bringing into their country doesn’t want the, the world that they want.
When they see the gay guy being stoned in the street to death, some gay, some, some twinky teen literally being hit with stones until he’s dead, crumpling to the ground in the middle of the street in Manhattan or something like this where they sanction this off or their Sharia law stoning, real quick they’re gonna want these people out of the country.
Yeah. Real quick we’re gonna get immigration,
Simone Collins: Bans in place. Oh, so you’re just saying it’s, it’s a forcing function thing.
Malcolm Collins: It’s a forcing function. We give them what they want.
Simone Collins: And people see what, what... Like, okay, right. Because I guess your broader argument is people are not willing [00:35:00] to intellectually wrap their heads around what many Muslim communities actually for really, like, for real really want.
And if we accelerate that and just give them a preview of where things are headed and say, “This is literally what you’re gonna get,” then this can be staved off from happening. So either it happens at, like, a 10% level now if we make it happen, or it happens at a 100% level 50 years from now-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, when they vote
Simone Collins: it into national law
thereby ruining countries. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Which is what they want. They want this to be the national law. Yeah. So
Malcolm Collins: let’s make this the
Simone Collins: law- And you’re just making it a 10% thing I think ... and
Malcolm Collins: then the final externality is you know how quickly the Muslim grape gangs are gonna die out when this gets implemented? You know how quickly a lot of this negative behavior we see, oh, y- w- let’s see, what’s the punishment for, for stealing in Sharia law?
We gonna get some hands lopped off here or something? l- we’ll see what the f- punishment for sluttiness is okay, so for a woman who sleeps with somebody out of wedlock it’s 100 lashes. So it’s the same as a man graping someone, which you know what?
I’m okay with [00:36:00] that. Stoning to death is if, if the woman is married, which I’m also okay with. For stealing, it’s the amputation of the right hand. I am 100% okay with that. Yeah, as for male and female thieves, cut off their hands. So yeah, you, you know how quickly the, the Muslim crime waves we’ve been dealing with are gonna stop when we start cutting off their fricking hands?
Real fast. And the great thing is, is this won’t be done by conservatives. This’ll be done by Muslims of their own communities, which will make their communities less externalities to other groups, and I bet conservatives might be able to get along with Muslims right fast when they start enacting their own punishments on their own group, right?
Like, I could... I’m, I’m being totally honest here. If Muslim communities were allowed to punish their own members in these incredibly strict and severe ways in, like, Canada, in the United States, in the UK, in Germany, a, a conservative like me, I, I honestly think... Because right now the Muslim community, like, why do I have a beef with the Muslim community?
They keep [00:37:00] graping my people, and then it gets covered up by the local police forces. Because they keep going out there and stealing from my people, right, from our government, right? From, from the local stores, from the... They create these enormous the, you know, thief games. They have your externalities when you look at, at, at, at, at, at rates of, of, of being involved in crime.
You see really high rates. If all of that dropped off a cliff, I’d have no f*****g problem. I’d have no problem with Muslims, right? Like, if, if, if, if... And I think it would drop off a cliff if we let them enact Sharia law.
Simone Collins: Well, I guess what you’re saying a lot, is a lot of this is downstream of our broader- At least personally st- very strongly held rule of we are cool with any cultural group that does its own thing, so long as it does not curtail on the rights or liberties or property of other groups.
And the problem- Right, like ... is that you’re saying this particular group is infringing upon the freedom, rights, liberty, and property of other groups that it sh- you know, has [00:38:00] no right to do. So they, they have become in a, or, and/or are becoming an increasingly existential threat to non-Muslim groups, and therefore- And I, and
Malcolm Collins: I wanna be clear here.
Your average Muslim in Britain, like, the, the average, the, the Muslim who wants Sharia law, your religiously observant Muslim, they do not like that these grooming gangs are happening.
Simone Collins: Sure. Of course not. No ...
Malcolm Collins: they,
Simone Collins: they, they want these- They’re, they’re horrible bad actors ...
Malcolm Collins: people punished because it makes them look bad and they want Sharia law in Britain, which may be antagonistic to our goals, but they don’t just, like, want every bad actor out there doing every bad thing, right?
Simone Collins: Like- Well, and I d- I do like, I do like the reframing of Sharia law. Like, I’m just a law and order citizen. Like is that so bad? Yeah. Like, in, in this era- Maximal law and order ... when I think about, like, one of the big sort of Asmongold points of, of our day and age is, hey, wouldn’t it be great if we actually enforced our laws?
That is a- ... it’s an interesting take and an angle that I hadn’t thought about before. What if we just... Like, is, is [00:39:00] Sharia law so bad in an era in which one of our biggest problems is a refusal, a, a broad, a refusal to in- impose laws that we have established and agreed upon as a, a base of citizens? Th- that we want these laws.
They should be here. But no. Yeah. No.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And well, and I, I think, I mean, even conservative Americans, if it ends up working and ha- having the Muslim community become positive actors in our countries, I think many Americans, you know, they, they see the guys, the thieves’ hands being chopped off instead of being released back on the street over and over again, they’re probably gonna be like I didn’t think I liked Islam that much, but I mean, if it’s only Muslims this is happening to, I’m fine.
I mean, that works for me, right?
Simone Collins: Well, I don’t know. But I’ve, I’ve listened to so many horrific stories of the mistreatment of especially children and women within this culture. But that’s
Malcolm Collins: common i- within
Simone Collins: Islamic countries. The problem though is, is well, the, it’s, and, and that it’s happening now without Sharia law.
In, and to your point I guess in many cases in [00:40:00] violation of Sharia law. So in, I think in a sense because they’re in these gray zones where they’re outside nations with Sharia law, nations that wouldn’t even take them as, for example, as, as refugees in some cases that are also sort of accommodating them and, and turning a blind eye to bad, bad actors and crimes being committed.
Perhaps there are, there’s an argument to be made, it’s possible that there are more atrocities committed against even Muslim, practicing Muslim women and children without Sharia law and with the law of the governing country turning a blind eye toward those communities and being like, “I’m not gonna look at this, la, la, la, la, la.”
Like, and, “It would be racist for me to notice anything,” which is screwed up. Yeah, and in a way that- Because even within those communities they’re like, “No, this is not okay,” and yet we have been defanged of the tools that we would use to police this among [00:41:00] people.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Islam has the tools baked into it to police Muslims.
Simone Collins: Right. But then of course those tools are illegal within, for example, the United Kingdom, so the United Kingdom refuses to impose its own laws on many of these groups for fear of being accused of racism or bias, but then these own groups don’t have the tools they require to enforce those laws themselves if they were to just do it without the UK.
So okay, I see your point. My goal, I mean, so obviously, like my number one goal is, you know, promote longterm human flourishing. Our general ideology is, hey, any group should be allowed to do its thing as long as they’re not- An existential threat to other group or impinging on the ability of another group to pursue its, its, you know, prerogative and, you know, have its stuff and do its thing.
But then, like, number three, I really, I don’t like people being harmed. I, I don’t, especially kids.
Malcolm Collins: But, but hold on. I mean, I think that, that you, you frame this in a way that confuses people [00:42:00] sometimes.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: I am totally okay with a group cucking with another group when that other group is net less productive than the group who’s f*****g with them less moral than the group who’s f*****g with them.
Because if, if you have a, a negative bad actor on, on your doorstep that’s constantly messing with you, right? Because a lot of people would take the things that you’re saying and saying, “Oh, when Israel defends itself against Hezbollah, that’s, that’s Jews being a negative externality for another
Simone Collins: group.” No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Because we per our morality at least, if another group is infringing upon your ability to do your sovereign thing within your own borders, y- you have every right to bop them, as we would say, to, like, retaliate. Because they are not allowing you to, within your own house, do your own thing. Mm. So that, I, I agree with you on that
Malcolm Collins: So, I mean, I just wanna end this with a, you know all those people who said we’re gonna have tons of boots on the ground in Iran?
I’ve always said I’m okay with Karg [00:43:00] Island. I’m okay with Karg Island as, as a limited military thing, but boots on the ground in Iran is stupid and Trump’s not gonna do that, and he didn’t do that. And people lied to you. Now, or they didn’t lie to you, they just have no f*****g idea how the world works and they’ve got a bu- an audience of third-worlders who’s totally captured them into these stupid anti-Semitic positions that are just not useful in terms of long-term human flourishing when we’re thinking about, like, useful allies.
‘Cause right now, Europe’s not a long-term useful ally for us. They are, they are incredibly cucked, and Israel actually goes out there, and when somebody acts a fool, they handle it. And I think that we in the United States, in Europe, need to take a l- a line from Israel’s book going forwards. And that that is why I’m totally okay with building this stronger alliance with them and seeing where things are going.
Right, right now I think Israel is actually acting with tacit approval of Trump to help in the negotiations. We can see how this ends up turning out or leaks that come out of the future. But broadly speaking, no, the stock market didn’t crash, the economy’s doing better than ever. No, oil [00:44:00] didn’t hit $200.
No, all of the, no, they, they said that all of the countries in the Middle East would start hating us, when the exact opposite has happened. All of the countries in the Middle East started hating Iran more, started liking us more. There, there has never been a PR campaign so successful for America in the Middle East as Iran deciding to randomly bomb its former allies.
Simone Collins: Right, but you are, you are one small voice whispering within a mosh pit of raging-
Malcolm Collins: Idiots ...
Simone Collins: people.
Malcolm Collins: Idiots. No
Simone Collins: one- The world is just raging ... no one is going to understand this. The message everyone’s gonna come away with is, “I can’t travel this summer because airline prices are insane. My gas prices are higher.
My food is more expensive. People in Europe have even higher prices.” And everyone else is just like, “Oh, and Trump has humiliated himself,” blah, blah, blah. So, like, I think even a lot of Republicans are gonna come away feeling like this was a net loss. No,
Malcolm Collins: I mean, a lot of Republicans have been incepted by these idiots who, like Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, who have giant third-worlder audiences, who have a...
I mean, that’s why, that’s why [00:45:00] Tucker Carlson’s moving to Qatar, right? Like, th- this is, this is where his, his, his butter is backed, by the way. Th- this is the position- His
Simone Collins: bread is buttered.
Malcolm Collins: His bread is buttered. They’ve got these giant audiences. As we pointed out in our episode, this changed everything, but the, the internet became significantly majority third world over the past 10 years.
The third world, this is why they stopped caring about, this is why the left stopped caring about, like, American blacks and, and, and the environment. The third-worlders don’t care about those things. And they all got- caught up in these idiot cycles, and they completely believe them. And when you look at rightist influencers, you would get the opinion that people are, are falling for this.
But when you look at the actual right, like MAGA MAGA, MAGA’s 9- 90% pro this war since the beginning, right? Like, MAGA has always been about this. It was never fooled by the captured parts of the influencer class that are acting on behalf of leftists and honestly anti-American interests. And it, it’s, it’s like do people step back and think, “Oh, they, they were just...”
They, [00:46:00] they don’t. They don’t remember. You were like... Like, I was talking to Simone in the car about this in the morning. I go, “Will anybody take a step back and be like, ‘Nick Fuentes had no f-ing idea what he was talking about when this war started.’?” And who was right? People like Nux and Malcolm who, who actually was right about where things were going.
And that maybe- Yeah,
Simone Collins: but what’s, what’s... I just, I’m just trying to say, like, what’s really frustrating is that you guys were right, but that’s not going to change the narrative of how this is gonna work. Like, the people writing the
Malcolm Collins: history of this- No, I, I think, I think we on the right need to be harsher both in terms of our time and our views of the anti-American voices on the right which have been growing.
And I think, I mean, Nick Fuentes isn’t on the right. He’s a Democrat now. He says he’s a Democrat now, just people are so stupid they think that he’s like a right-wing, which he’s not. He’s just a Democrat. But Tucker Carlson still claims to be on the right, right? L- these people... A- and there’s these people with, th- th- you, you see them over, over, who was it?
There was some b- w- Republican influencer who’s all mad about this deal and is saying who’s got a thing on Russian state [00:47:00] TV
Laura Southern is who I was thinking of here. I saw it on nux
Malcolm Collins: like literally paid by the Russians, you know, to try to... And as we pointed out, the Russians, behind BLM, see our episode on that if you are unaware of this they funded a...
Nine out of every ten dollars that went to influencing US politics, one would go to, to quote-unquote pro-Trump stuff, nine would go to b- pro-BLM stuff. Russia has been the party that’s just like we need to f- with Americans. Like, sow division, everything like that. You guys don’t need to do that, right?
Like, when we work with Jews, we get things done, okay? Like, this was pretty cool. You know, actually winning a war. Actually getting what we wanted to, which was a degradation of their military resources to the extent that they’re not gonna be able to move forward, and more eyes and ears in their country by people who don’t want them to develop nuclear weapons.
And those people having a vested interest to continue to invest into the country and own more assets in the country, which makes it harder for Iran to operate independently of the interests of these other Middle Eastern countries. Mm. Which is, again, in our interest because [00:48:00] these guys are our...
They’re, they’re actually pretty useful allies. They can, I mean, like Saudi Arabia, 9/11, right? Like, they can, Be backstabby, certainly more than the Jews. But recently at least, Saudi Arabia’s been pretty good. And so, you know, will that work forever into the future? Hey, all we need to do is keep developing technology, because it’s not coming out of these regions, and the future is all AI, okay?
So the more automated drone swarms we get, the less we need to worry about these people’s opinions. And so in the meantime, let’s let them handle their own, and that’s something we need to be doing more of when it comes to dealing with, I think, Muslim populations. So you heard it here first, base camp, we need sharia law.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Oh, my
Malcolm Collins: God. Yeah, this, is this where you thought I was gonna go with this?
Simone Collins: No. This is not where I thought you were gonna go, but I love that you always surprise me. After all these years together, you never cease to shock and surprise. I love you, Malcolm.
Malcolm Collins: I love you, [00:49:00] too. I’m really excited to see this direction.
Obviously, things could still blow up. I mean, Iran is, as I’ve said, a bunch of rogue actors, and if any of them decide to act basically all the central government can do is to either call in outside assistance or go scorched earth on the rogue actors. Unless the rogue actor’s action gives him more political influence, and then it becomes this whole...
So, you know, so we’ll see.
Simone Collins: Yeah. But I, I do... I would feel a lot more comfortable just personally, like, all right, how soon is it gonna be until Iran, you know, uses its continued tacit knowledge, or at least, like, documented internal knowledge of, like, developing nuclear weapons to just get back where it was.
And if there’s some sort of way to align incentives in such a way where, like, they just really wouldn’t wanna do that because they are better served by not, then I would feel more comfortable. I don’t care what the treaties are. I don’t care what the agreements are. I care about the infrastructure that’s going to be set up after this conflict that would dissuade them from doing that.
So the fact that there [00:50:00] may be some of that from what you said has me excited. Hopefully, that’s what happens.
Malcolm Collins: Yep, hopefully that’s what happens. I don’t see where we’re gonna get a better carrot that we don’t have to pay for than this. So fantastic scenario.
Simone Collins: All
Malcolm Collins: right. Thank you, and to our audience do something to improve yourself today.
Yeah, snap that in. You have to learn to use a new AI product or something.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Do it.
Malcolm Collins: All right, bye.
Simone Collins: .
We’re so close to getting those new mics. Just, just waiting for a potential discount. Just bear with me. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Well, and we’ve gotta get personal audio
Simone Collins: for you guys. Yeah, no, I’m, I’m excited for this conversation because again, I, I looked... Like I thought I was crazy, you know, when I was talking with you in the car this morning, but then I look at the like Drudge this morning “Obama deal better, Trump humiliation, MAGA hot- MA- MAGA hawk mutiny, text leaks.”
Like it just sounds horrible and then I go to The New York Times, their front page
Speaker 15: No, Indy. No, Indy. No, [00:51:00] Indy. It says area closed Remember, Toasty, yesterday you saw pictures of lily pads and, and flowers? Now you’re seeing them in real life
Speaker 16: Well, some plants grow in water. They’re aquatic plants Mommy. Yeah? Why do-
Birds like water too, don’t they?
Oh no, that’s what they like to eat Well, what if the alligator’s gotta eat something? You eat birds, toaster, you eat chicken nuggets. Yeah Yeah. That says area temporarily closed. We could just go in there ‘cause alligators don’t eat kids. What does temporarily mean? What does temporarily mean? Uh, you look yummy to alligators,
Speaker 14: Titan.
No. What does temporarily mean?
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Dive into the controversy surrounding the Los Angeles mayoral election with Malcolm and Simone Collins on Based Camp. Spencer Pratt appeared to be on track for a runoff spot but was suddenly overtaken by a third Democratic candidate amid massive late mail-in ballot surges. Was this organic voting patterns, or something more suspicious?
The Collinses review claims of election irregularities, including the puzzling vote count updates that showed zero votes for Pratt in one batch, Skid Row vote harvesting (with residents allegedly paid in cigarettes and cash), ballot collection practices, and the broader issues of mail-in voting in deep-blue LA. They explore both the mainstream counter-narratives and on-the-ground reports while discussing voter ID, election integrity, and why local races matter.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be discussing the latest LA election and the shenanigans that- that may or may not have occurred around that.
Shenanigans.
A couple of our fans were like, “This is the most blatant cheating I have ever seen in an American election,” and they wanted us to look into it.
And I will say that this is an interesting thing for me to look into, because I really don’t know... Like, obviously, if there was election fraud that happened The New York Times, NPR, all the major leftist sources are not going to admit it, because they didn’t want Pratt to win, right?
Simone Collins: Well, and what I did hear from my broad leftist news sources was
Malcolm Collins: Yeah,
Simone Collins: you gotta go, buddy.
What I heard from my broad leftist news sources was something along the lines of the Republicans are butt-hurting because Pen- Spencer Pratt didn’t even come close to winning, but he never would because he’s a Republican running in LA, and that seems totally reasonable, so I didn’t think to look further.
How can this be a [00:01:00] thing? I, I don’t understand why there could be any weirdness-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and then the, the secondary thing is obviously, and I, I, you know, I hate to say this about our side, but our side, like if he if, if there was actual election fraud, they would all be saying that regardless. So we don’t actually gain any new information from what they say there.
But we don’t gain a lot of new information from our side because obviously no matter what happened, if he legitimately lost at the last second our side would of course come out and say there’s election fraud, right? So that doesn’t exactly give me additional information
so what we’re going to do is we are going to review from both sides pieces on this particular alleged fraud.
And
Simone Collins: then we’re going to- Wait, so the fraud ‘cause you had told me earlier that you thought that the issue was... I mean, it’s inevitable that a Democrat’s gonna win in Los Angeles.
Malcolm Collins: No. It’s not so it’s kind of fraud. So there was a, a two-tiered runoff, okay? Okay. This is the gist of it, right? So there’s this runoff system, it’s called, like, a jungle primary where they decide who’s gonna run, and it means- Okay
you can have multiple Dems running against each other- Sure ... or a Dem versus a [00:02:00] Republican. Yeah. The leading candidate was this terrible Dem candidate. The, the Black woman, whatever her name is. Anyway she, she was coming in first. Then Pratt was coming in, and then there was a third Democrat that had about half the votes that Pratt had- Okay
in terms of sentiment polling, in terms of what they were able to measure, in terms of, like, at the ballots, bold, voter exit polling. And then at the very last moment, all of a sudden this flips. Mm. And all of a sudden- Mm ... Pratt’s getting no more votes- Uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh ... and all the votes are going to the third candidate.
This is something that the, the narrative of I have laid it out is the narrative that even the left disagree with. Everyone agrees Pratt was demonstrably in the lead i- in terms of spot number two. And then now was he ever gonna win the full election? I, probably not. But the having him i- be in the final runoff was scaring people, right?
So Pratt was demonstrably in [00:03:00] the lead, then all of a sudden this socialist candidate flips it up, right? And-
Simone Collins: Doesn’t it have to do more with the fact that mail-in voting was very heavy in the Los Angeles election, that ballots could be posted quite late, and that it could be that this particular third candidate had a really heavy and also late mail-in voting campaign push?
Malcolm Collins: Well, that is the only plausible thing, except from at least my reading of this, they didn’t have a heavy and late mail-in voting push. So the explanation that leftists have been using
Okay. The explanation that leftists have been using for this is that, okay, yes, she didn’t have a coordinated mail in voting campaign that could explain this, but mail in voters are overwhelmingly Democratic in nature, right?
And so if the mail in voters are overwhelmingly Democratic in nature-
I don’t even remember what I was saying.
Simone Collins: So I had asked you it, [00:04:00] my, what I had heard was, oh, the Republicans are butt hurting about Spencer Pratt being in a minority lead for a little bit and then losing a bunch of ground all of a sudden seemingly. But what they’re missing is that Republicans are heavy with in-person voting, Democrats are heavy with mail-in voting, and in Los Angeles and in California in general I think even postmarked- Ooh
maybe even possibly up to the day of the election you can still submit mail-in ballots, and that what is happening is that possibly this third candidate or Democrats in general were just doing their last minute thing and sending in their mail-in ballots- Yes ...
Malcolm Collins: and that’s what was
Simone Collins: happening.
Malcolm Collins: So we will explore this theory, but there’s- Okay
a problem with it.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: The problem goes that in this last minute push that happened all of a sudden for this Democratic candidate, the votes should have, right, like if it had been like a normal election, should have continued to go disproportionately to the Democrat who looked like they were going to win the first place, right?
The voting [00:05:00] shouldn’t have shifted between Democratic candidates late in the process like this. That doesn’t make mathematical or narrative sense. So we’re going to get it- Because, yeah, it could just be that a bunch of Dem votes came in at the last minute, right? But then those votes would presumably proportionally still be for the person who won top ticket first, and then for the person who ended up beating out Pratt second, not almost all exclusively for the person who edged out Pratt.
So we’re gonna look into both of these explanations because there are, you know, plausibles and then it’s like, okay, yeah, but what’s really happening here?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Like, my, my standing plausible theory is that whatever that third candidate that got a surge after, you know, the, the, then overtook Spencer Pratt was just one who heavily focused on last minute mail-in ballot-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah
voting. So we’re gonna see if that’s true, and we’re also going to go into what the leftist counter-narrative is. So I’m gonna start with the leftist counter-narrative, okay? The leftist counter-narrative goes like this. And [00:06:00] I’ll be reading from a piece, How a Misreading of Data Fueled False Claims About LA Mayoral Vote Count.
Okay?
Late on election night, an update of vote counts in Los Angeles mayor’s election appeared on electoral results pages of various media outlets, including the Los Angeles Times. It showed leading Democrats Mayor Karen Bass and Council Member Neda Rahman receiving tens of thousands of new votes, and leading Republican former reality TV star Pen- Spencer Pratt from receiving no new votes.
So basically, on the screen, there was this big, like, huge number of votes to these two Democrats, and then literally zero votes for Spencer Pratt. Some voter, observers of the vote tally immediately took the screenshots with some shouting fraud. I mean, that looks a lot like fraud. Others ran statistical analysis that showed it would be impossible for a candidate such as Pratt running second in the race to receive zero votes in such a large batch of bal- ballots.
In fact, the update that showed zero Pratt votes was [00:07:00] followed one minute later by another update that showed tens of thousands of votes for Pratt and none for Bass or Rahman. There was no batch of votes that included zero votes for any candidate, and LA County’s own data shows that plainly. But the claim’s fit was the broader false narrative being pushed relentlessly by Trump and other Republicans in recent days that California Democrats were cheating.
Voter data pushed out by the Associated Press came as two separate updates one minute apart, with Bass and Rahman’s votes in the first and Pratt’s in the second. The AP vote count receives updates as provided by election officials and adds them to our vote count. What happened in this case is that there was some log in an automated update, such as that one candidate’s votes were added in an update, and the other candidates were followed about a minute later, the Associated Press told The Times.
Specifically, an elec- electronic update from the Los Angeles County website pulled in votes from only one cro- group of candidates, including Karen Bass and N- Rahman. [00:08:00] Exactly one minute later, the electra- the electronic update picked up votes from another group of candidates, including Spencer Pratt.
Taken together, the updates included the 21,000 votes for Pratt, the 12,000, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Okay. Does that sound plausible to you?
Simone Collins: I don’t know with this election stuff. Like, the way stuff is counted and the way stuff is reported to me feels very opaque even though it’s designed to allegedly be trackable and, and transparent.
And I know that there’s a ton of shady stuff, and also very inconsistent stuff that comes with mail in ballots. For example, we just voted in the Republican primary election in our local area, right? And we had requested due to sometimes unexpected travel to have mail in ballots. You received your mail in ballot.
I did not even though I requested mine. And I know that I had requested one because- Well, there’s been a
Malcolm Collins: lot of it. When you say I received, you didn’t receive your mail in ballot, what we’ve seen, and somebody might have voted under your name by the way just so you [00:09:00] know what’s been a common form of voter fraud recently is going around houses and taking the mail in ballots as they come in-
Simone Collins: Yeah
Malcolm Collins: and then using them to vote. And people have been filmed doing this. This isn’t a conspiracy.
Speaker 20: On Tuesday just before midnight, David Sprouse’s surveillance cameras captured this man stealing not just his mail but his neighbor’s as well. It was a younger-looking man, uh, happened to come down the sidewalk. He was wearing a ball cap, face mask, gloves. Uh, carefully opened up our mailbox, took out all of our mail.
Simone Collins: Yeah, and yeah. It’s, this is, this is entirely possible because in the last election your ballot was missing. Remember when you had to fill out the provisional? ‘Cause I, then I went to the polling station this year.
I had to go to to
Malcolm Collins: vote. Yeah, I did not, and all these replies-
Simone Collins: And I was like, “Well, okay, maybe I forgot to request my mail in ballot. Maybe it was my mistake so I’ll just go and vote.” So I go and vote. They’re like, “Well, you requested a mail in ballot so now you have to fill in a provisional ballot instead.”
And so I did that. And remember last time we voted you had to do that because your mail in ballot went mysteriously missing. So e- if you and I are [00:10:00] experiencing this,
Malcolm Collins: but the point being is that it, it’s happened in multiple election cycles with our house, which makes it to me seem highly plausible that we are looking at systemic election fraud happening in this way in our area.
I- given that the, the, their systems all show the vote went out, right? Like, that’s why we’re having to fill in these provisional ballots. It’s not, like, a mistake that we made or something like that, and it’s happened multiple times. Mm. So- Yeah. And, and we do know that the, the, the wider Philadelphia area is one of the areas where, th- that has had serious allegations of this.
It has? And note now for the people who are like, “Election fraud never happens,” we now have videos... What? Oh, the kids. We now have videos of people stuffing the ballot boxes and stuff like that in some past recent American elections.
Speaker 16: This surveillance video, showing a supporter of Mayor Joe Ganim and a City Hall employee stuffing envelopes into the dropbox outside the Bridgeport Government Center. Now, the other [00:11:00] investigation will look into the use, distribution, and possession of absentee ballots at the Fireside Apartments, which is a senior and disabled public housing here in the Park City.
The Commission says even before last Tuesday’s primary, there was a significant attention in allegations of ballot abuse.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Mm. Have you seen these, Simone? They’re crazy.
Simone Collins: No. And also, like, these days I don’t know what’s fake and what’s real, and-
Malcolm Collins: Well, it, it becomes, it
Simone Collins: becomes a blur of real
I, I mean, like, when, when I ran, when I ran for office here- Like- ... remember, like, I, I spoke with a lot of people who were super involved in elections- Mm ... who were getting out the vote, who were trying to help the... In, in my case, of course, since I was a Republican candidate, I was talking with people doing the Republican stuff.
And they were talking about their experiences watching elections, watching the votes come in, and then seeing these strange and sudden changes in vote count and jumps in favor of a different candidate at the last minute. But again, like- I don’t know. You know, in the end, like
Malcolm Collins: there’s- But no, Simone, what I’m telling you, is there have been confirmed videos- Mm
of people stuffing [00:12:00] vote mailboxes. This is not a maybe it’s AI generated or something like that. This is a, this is coming from police who have gone through security videos that have shown people showing up in the middle of the night with big bundles of ballots, looking really shady both ways, stuffing them in the box, then coming back 30 minutes later and doing it again.
Jesus.
Simone Collins: Oh,
Malcolm Collins: my ... th- th- there, there have been elections in the United States where this has happened. We know from the Texas issues that there were I think it was, what was it? At least like 50,000, 100,000 fake votes. And, and this is just in Texas that were confirmed. So like we know that this is happening in the United States.
Like, these are questions. The idea that you should never question an election, I think as soon as Trump won again, that went out the window because then all the Democrats started saying-
Simone Collins: Well, hey, that’s... See, Trump is just doing God’s work, all right? He’s getting them to be critical of election integrity.
They sh- I mean, again, like it’s, it’s so funny. I grow up thinking like, “Of course vote by mail is fine. Of course we don’t [00:13:00] need voter ID.” And now I’m like, wait a second, like this is actually super shady. Like, I, I even don’t like the idea that... Again, like when I went to the polling station to do my provisional ballot this year, I I w- I was like, “Oh crap, I don’t have my ID with me.”
Like, it... Of course I assumed as any, like, normal person that if I’m going to vote in an election, and if this is something where it’s like, oh, you know, I verified this, verified that, like they’re gonna ask me for my ID. And yet, no, it’s just like your, your name and a signature or something.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So the, the biggest coun- counter to this piece is that it doesn’t focus on the core instance of election fraud that Republicans are claiming, right?
It doesn’t explain either of the... It basically focuses on one glitch that would make anyone suspicious, right? Why, why were the two Democratic candidates in one grouping and the Republican candidate in a different grouping in the way that they were handling the ballots in the first [00:14:00] place, right? Like, presumably they would all have their own groupings if that’s the way it was being done, where they would be updated individually, not in groupings like that.
That makes very little sense. I can see why people were suspicious of that. But then it doesn’t even mention the other claims that people are talking about- Mm ... with the Skid Row vote harvesting. So we’re gonna get into that in a second, but I also wanted to, before I go further- Skid- oh, they’re
Simone Collins: going to, like, vagrants living in tents and stuff and getting them to vote?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and paying them to vote
Simone Collins: Ah.
Malcolm Collins: And there have been, lots of people have reported on this. There’s been a lot of on the ground reporters who have gone and asked the people in-
Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s just the, the sort of thing that would be great for YouTube views. I could totally s- yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and they’re, they’re, they’re, it’s, they’re all saying like, “Oh yeah, of course.
Like I got cigarettes for voting this year. I got, I got $2 for voting this year.” You know? Or for filling out these forms. You know, and people have been saying in the comments and stuff like this, that this is actually a very old practice in LA County that they use. Specifically things like [00:15:00] teachers unions and stuff like that use it whenever they wanna get something through, you know, like, the, the, it’s, it’s like... Well, what’s wrong, buddy?
Simone Collins: Friend? Friend? Whoa. Okay, here we go Friend, did we... We’re not missing any threads. I think he just, like, deep throated a thread and then it came out and ignited his gag reflex. You okay now, buddy?
Malcolm Collins: He wants it back immediately now that he’s choked on it
Simone Collins: Oh,
Malcolm Collins: God. Going straight at it again. Okay. Oh, God.
Simone Collins: Okay. Yeah. Tripping on voter fraud.
Malcolm Collins: So what we’re gonna go, and, and I will put some of these videos in here
Simone Collins: Yeah ... for you people. I, yeah, I, I would, yes. I wanna-
Malcolm Collins: But the problem with this is, like, nobody cares. And it’s been interesting, Jimmy, because we can [00:16:00] see this vote buying happening.
Everybody knows that Democrat, like, on the ground people would do this. It doesn’t even need to be institutionalized. But this wouldn’t explain the last minute change in mail-in voting, right? Because the Skid Row voters are not the mail in voters. You, you don’t have a lot of mail in voters who are homeless people, right?
The homeless people who are being paid to vote are coming and voting in person likely. So that doesn’t really fit the broader narrative here. But let’s go into this. Here we have a piece called Spencer Pratt Pack uncovers disturbing new mystery in Skid Row. Okay? And this is from the New York Post. A Spencer Pratt volunteer team has claimed they found lots of ballots that were sent out to Skid Row, but few were actually voted in the mayoral l- race.
The California Post joined four members of the Pratt pack on Sunday as they spent hours touring the rundown neighborhood. Former California State Senate candidate Susan Collins, interviews a resident on Skid [00:17:00] Row. They asked dozens of local about voter registration, mail in ballots, and the petition gatherers who had worked in the district for years trying to get them to vote.
It comes just a week after Pratt was dumped out of the race for mayor after Karen Bass won and Nayan Ramak received a huge pile of mail in ballots that saw her dramatically overtake him. Susan Collins, a former California State Senate candidate, who was part of the Pratt pack on Sunday, told the Post, “We’re finding a lot of people being registered to vote, a lot of ballots being sent out, and nobody actually voted.”
Oh, so that would explain how they did it Okay, so, so this is what basically is being alleged, Simone. It’s that they are going in and paying these people to register to vote, and then basically keeping their information, and because these people are homeless anyway, like, the vote’s not gonna go to their house.
They just send it to their own houses and then mail on behalf of these people. I think the... [00:18:00] No one can hear you. You’re muted. You’re muted.
Simone Collins: Okay, so I am me, whatever, right? I, and I care about getting X candidate registered, so I just walk along Skid Row and I’m like, “Hey, can I, can I register you? You can just use my address,” and they don’t even necessarily know what I-
Yeah
and then I give them a pack of cigarettes, probably just a cigarette, maybe three. I don’t know. Whatever. And then I just get their, their thing. I, w- I, I, I forge their signa- I mean, they, they do this weird thing where, like, the signatures are supposed to match, so how do, how do you think that would work?
Malcolm Collins: You just- I don’t think they check or care if it’s a Democratic candidate. I mean, come on. They’re not, they’re not really checking right now. The thing that people keep asking for, Republicans keep pushing for, is the voter rolls. And- Mm-hmm ... the fact that they are not releasing the voter rolls, like, I can understand if they believe that there is fraudulent voting going on- Yeah
Why they wouldn’t release these voter rolls, right? Because it would look really bad for them to do.
Yeah.
And I’d point out here, you, you’re like, “Yeah, LA is heavily Democrat leaning,” which [00:19:00] is true, but Pratt’s campaign was astonishingly good, and Democrats have done an astonishingly bad job running LA for a while at this point.
Simone Collins: People are getting pretty fed up.
Speaker 11: Please, I’m begging you. There’s homeless drug addicts in front of the schools. My children aren’t safe. Look, if you were a transgender migrant, I could get you a free pussy. Let’s move the drug addicts closer. Bass already solved crime. I endorse her. Next!
Speaker 14: I just wanna rebuild my home. It’s been over a year.[00:20:00]
Speaker 15: This is a machine. If we wanna burn this town to the ground
Feels so close to you right now You can do it, Spencer!
Simone Collins: I’m, there, there was, there was a lot of of smear campaignage to try to make Pratt look bad, of course, as well But yeah, sure
Malcolm Collins: Also to your question of whether she did some big [00:21:00] genius last-minute mail in campaign what AI said is, no, she didn’t. It said the most realistic answer is Rama is a sitting council member who is well-known among progressive LAs.
Her base, younger, more liberal urban Democrats, is much more likely to vote by mail closer to the deadline.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: The problem, again, is why did they switch from voting from the front runner to her all of a sudden the moment it looked like the front runner was going to beat Pratt?
Simone Collins: Maybe because once you know they’re gonna win, why give them pity votes when you could show support for an underdog that you really like?
Malcolm Collins: That’s a good possible explanation. They’re
Simone Collins: waiting. Like, I, I could see myself doing that as a young Los Angeles voter trying to... I, I guess she gets nothing out of it, but she has a less- ... a less embarrassing loss. And, and certainly getting more votes, it could be a starting point to future campaigns. You know, it shows future campaign donors that she has the capability of gaining traction even when running up against [00:22:00] better funded, more famous opponents, right?
So-
Malcolm Collins: Yes. So to go back into what’s f- f- fuddy here. Okay A review of public records identified more than 7,600 registered voters linked to shelters, supportive housing projects, addiction to their treatment centers, and social services agencies, including one of 160 registrants contacted to the Midnight Mission in Skid Row.
One longtime local told volunteers on Sunday he personally knew the Mariana Del Rey woman recently charged by federal prosecutors was paying homeless people to register to vote. Brendan Lee Brown Armstrong, also known as Annika, was charged in May with paying another person to register to vote. So people have been charged over this as well.
This isn’t just a conspiracy theory. The question is, are they still doing it? According to federal prosecutors, Armstrong worked for years as a paid petition circulator collecting signatures for California ballot measures, and has agreed to plead guilty. Wow. “She was right on this corner,” they said. This was her area,” Titus Brown told volunteers.
Brown [00:23:00] claimed people were routinely offered money or cigarettes to sign forms. “She gives them $3 to $5. Some of the cheap people she’d give $2 and a cigarette,” he alleged. But Brown told LA Times- Dude, that’s
Simone Collins: so little
Malcolm Collins: Our elections are being sold for very little. But you know, they pay more per vote if you’re talking about, like, the main elections in the United States.
Simone Collins: Yeah. For sure. That’s crazy.
Malcolm Collins: Throughout the years residents remembered registering to vote. They remember petition gatherers. What many didn’t remember was actually casting a ballot which is interesting. They, they remember people coming around and trying to get them to register. They just don’t remember then voting.
Speaker 3: Videos posted online by LA Needs Spencer Pratt shows multiple Skid Row residents claiming they received around $2 in exchange for voting in the recent Los Angeles election. Karen Bass, yeah? Yeah. Or, or Nithya Raman? Uh, Karen.
Speaker 5: Karen. They told you to vote for Karen? Yeah. They had to sign the little thing. That’s, uh, and how much they pay you? It’s, like, two bucks. [00:24:00] Two bucks? Oh, to sign off on a, on a thing to vote for her? Yeah. And so they do this for everybody out here? Yeah, they come out here all the time. Several residents made similar claims.
Speaker 3: One man alleged he was not registered to vote in Los Angeles County but was still encouraged to complete paperwork. I’m not in this county. I’m in San Bernardino County, but they just said, “Who cares?” They gave me a name to, to write. They gave you a name to sign? They gave me everything to sign. They gave me a whole paper of, like, who, what to write and who to sign and everything, so.
Another resident alleged people were sometimes instructed how to complete voter paperwork and ballots. But we know that they gotta answer to somebody by what they said, so it ‘cause it’s not authentic. I don’t wanna have to scratch it out. And don’t let your signature look like the other signature. Can you use your other hand, or can you write with your foot or your nose?
Speaker 7: I’m serious. They ask you to do that? Yeah. For ballots? And I was doing it just so I could get the money.
Malcolm Collins: The volunteers moved through the tents, shelters, and service centers, sidewalk encampments, interviewing people, residents about their experiences with the drives. “A [00:25:00] lot of people never voted,” Brown said. “They did register, but they just wanted the names.” That’s interesting. For Collins, a- and ap- apparently this was still happening in this election, and they know people have been arrested for doing this in past elections, so it sounds like it’s still operational.
For Collins, who had spent the year raising concerns about ballot collection practices, the most striking part of Sunday’s visit was hearing the same story repeated block after block. “So what I’ve been hearing from a lot of people is that they’re registered to vote,” Collins says. “I’ve not found anyone, anyone who has actually voted.”
Simone Collins: Wow.
Malcolm Collins: The big question is what happened to all those ballots? People remember getting them. They don’t remember voting. So where did they go? And Julio, who was visiting Skid Row for the first time, described that experience as eye-opening and said it strengthened her determination to be involved rather than watch from afar.
“It was really intense,” Juliano said. “We saw a guy chasing another guy with a shovel and attack him.” Juliano said she came to sh- Skid Row looking for answers and convinced there was more to the election story than the voters were being told. Wow. “I guess I was part of [00:26:00] trying to figure out what happened.
The numbers just don’t make sense. That’s why I’m digging deeper into the sidelines. One thing I would like to say is I think this election fraud has forever changed Los Angeles,” she said. “At least that’s my hope, that people will feel empower- empowered to talk about the truth and keep looking for the truth.”
And there have been other reporting on different types ... So from a different New York Post piece, bombshell photo unveils damning Nithan Raman link with homeless voters as fury erupts over LA vote count. Thousands of homeless voters are registered to vote in LA shelters, and Sprint Sir Pret was eliminated by Nithan Raman.
So they, they, they then did a review here. And it said the ... so here they’re looking to see, Yeah, this seems to be, it, it seems to be the same thing. They’re just going over video evidence of this that they found. So here’s where I come at the end of this. Like, what, what do I think on all of this?
Did Democrats do this in the past? Yes, we know they did, and they’ve been charged for it in the past. Is it the [00:27:00] type of thing that Democrats would do? Like, consider the size of, like, Antifa and stuff in LA. You’re not asking, did the Democrats organize this from the top down? Right. You’re asking, was there any rogue group of Democrats, extremist leftists in LA with motivation and means and opportunity to do this?
There was definitely manifold of those.
Simone Collins: Well, okay. Here’s where I’m gonna push back, right? So the person who got the surge in votes was someone who wasn’t going to win anyway, and it was very clear that they weren’t going to win, correct?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: And then suddenly these votes appeared. When you do pay someone to buy you votes, right, illegally, sure, this person, you know, people like this are paying one or two cigarettes, three bucks per person.
Mm-hmm. But they in turn are charging probably quite a lot per voter because of the legal liability to which they’re [00:28:00] subject, as is shown by the convictions we see here, right? Mm-hmm. People are doing time. People are really paying a lot in terms of when you get caught. So when they’re weighing the odds of getting caught they’re, they’re ultimately gonna charge a lot more.
So why would this one particular candidate or people supporting this one candidate pay that much for votes that weren’t going to help them win anyway? That doesn’t make sense to me. I’m more likely to believe a conspiracy theory- What do you mean votes
Malcolm Collins: that did help them win? I’m confused.
Simone Collins: My understanding...
Oh, sorry. It’s the fragility company.
Malcolm Collins: So anyway, what was the point you were making? Why, why do you not believe that there... You, you said the amount it costs- So my understanding was that
Simone Collins: the surge of votes that came in, that were presumably bought, were for a candidate that was never going to win in the first place, that was not the Democratic front-runner, right?
Malcolm Collins: Right. It
Simone Collins: was- So why would someone pay the non-trivial cost to buy voters? Because what you’re paying, you know, the people to commit a, a crime is pretty high. Like, the premium [00:29:00] is high.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but what you are forgetting is the, the crime was already committed either way. So, presumably, the way that this works, given the various points that we’ve heard, is I, a Democrat, go and I ask homeless people to sign up to vote.
And I give them my address, right?
Simone Collins: Okay, so it’s, it’s like a subscription. It’s like I, I have on offer every single voting cycle, these are my homeless people. Would you like my homeless people this
Malcolm Collins: year? Yes, every single voting cycle- Would you like my homeless people? ... I have on offer a list of votes that I can choose how they go.
Simone Collins: And then who, who knows how it’s administered, right? It could be like I’m this one person, this crime boss of Democratic politics or whatever polit- like, who knows? And it could be apolitical, who’s just like, “I’m gonna decide how I deal with these votes.” It could even be someone who’s not paying someone else.
It could be a totally third party who’s like, “Who do I want to have my votes go toward?” Yeah. This is my little kingdom. So
Malcolm Collins: the crime would have already been done. Uh-huh. They would’ve been sitting on votes that they have to cast either
Simone Collins: way. Yes. They’re like, “How do I want my votes to go?” [00:30:00] They could have decided, “Well, I know that the, the, their...
We don’t have to worry about Spencer Pratt. This Democratic front-runner’s gonna win. I want to place this, this up-and-coming Democratic candidate.”
Malcolm Collins: Well, the wording would be, “I wanna make sure that Spencer Pratt isn’t in the final election,” ‘cause that’s what would’ve happened otherwise.
Simone Collins: Oh. Oh, I’m sorry. I totally missed that.
So if he had not been surpassed by this other Democrat, he would’ve been on the,
Malcolm Collins: the- Yeah, he would’ve been on the ballot for the
Simone Collins: final then Oh, and then there actually was, he ha- would actually have a shot, instead of just two Democrats.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Oh, okay. Well then, okay, yeah. The, the incentives are more clear then.
Okay, thank you. Now I know. Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: so now you understand the incentives, yeah. Yeah. So, basically I’m in a position of the people who are saying, like, basically at this point we’re at a point where I say demonstrably we know that voter fraud happened. Mm-hmm. The question is the scale of the voter fraud.
Simone Collins: Correct.
Malcolm Collins: And the, the, it, it really bothers me [00:31:00] that like we’re seeing mainstream Democratic outlets that are supposed to be like out there searching for truths completely uninterested in this. De- despite the overwhelming, I mean, we’ve got a conviction already, right? Like,
Simone Collins: the- Right. Well, the problem is all sides do it.
I mean, even arguably sides that people who don’t have a side. Mm. People who are just making money because this is a way to make money are doing it. Like, it, it’s one of those things where-
Malcolm Collins: I’ve never- ... I
Simone Collins: think a lot of people are- It’s all sides ... are concerned. Also, journalists are, journalists in mainstream media have this, there’s, like, there are two tiers, right?
Mm. Of like, is this a good story? Will this perform well? But also they have this whole, like, you know, I, I need to decide what the people can handle or not, right? Like, I’m not going to touch this conspiracy theory because it might incite racism or conspiracy thinking or- I was
Malcolm Collins: talking to the other day, one of our friends couldn’t believe the conspiracy theory that Michelle Obama was a man.
Simone Collins: Yeah. It’s
Malcolm Collins: like, and Simone, I’m like, “Simone, there’s a lot of evidence. You gotta,
Simone Collins: you gotta believe.” There’s not. There’s that, that, that, that dance... There, there’s nothing in her pants. You guys don’t [00:32:00] know female slacks. I’m sorry, but, like, women’s pants are
Malcolm Collins: weird. There, there is something hitting her pants from behind.
Simone Collins: There’s nothing hitting her pants from behind. There’s nothing. Not, it’s, it’s the way they crease. There is, there
Malcolm Collins: is-
Simone Collins: You don’t know what flowy pants... Men don’t wear pants like that. They don’t understand how they...
Speaker: Michelle
Simone Collins: mm, mm. Anyway, anyway, so I feel like this isn’t necessarily people trying to cover something up.
I think that there’s this journalistic, like, “I decide what the public can and cannot handle, and I believe that the public cannot handle this. Therefore, I’m not going to cover it because the, the nuance will be lost, and they’ll just, you know, it will undermine democracy, and I’m not gonna play a part in that.”
And I think that a lot of people see us as being irresponsible for feeding into the conspiracy theories when it, like, is, there are really [00:33:00] serious issues of voter fraud. But I also see the point of journalists who are like, “I’m not gonna bother co- cover- covering this,” because what are you gonna do, Malcolm?
Like, we can’t uncover these people. Like, we can’t find them. This is a lot harder to uncover than, like, daycare fraud, you know? Like, th- this is much more hidden, much more insidious. People have been trying to find this forever. It’s really difficult to uncover because of the way the systems work, because there’s no voter ID, because you can just take a ballot out of a, a, a thing.
And like, it, like, even if, even if every signature is checked for a match, you can easily find what someone’s signature looks like. Like, it, this is one of those very difficult situations, you know?
Malcolm Collins: N- I don’t, I don’t think it is. I, I think we’re dealing with a scenario where, I mean, I understand w- why they’re doing what they’re doing.
Like, every, I think, sane American knows that even if there was demonstrable and large voter fraud, they wouldn’t cover it. Because it goes against their political interest, right? Like, we haven’t really seen them cover many things that go against their political interests.
Simone Collins: Well, no, no. I mean, it goes in their political interest when it’s about, [00:34:00] like, a, a Republican candidate winning.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah, a Republican candidate, yeah. But the point being is you’re like, I, both sides are d- I don’t think in LA Spencer Pratt or even the LA Republican Party has enough institution to commit voter fraud at this size.
Simone Collins: Right. Right. But I mean, I’m, I’m sure there’s Republican voter fraud in other areas.
Look, it’s, it’s,
Malcolm Collins: this is
Simone Collins: a system they do it.
Malcolm Collins: I doubt it’s at the same scale. Highly
Simone Collins: I don’t know.
Malcolm Collins: I don’t know I mean, it- it’s, it’s there. It’s just when we look at... And, and the reason why I doubt so strongly it’s at the same scale- Hmm ... is if you look at the Republican apparatus, because we’ve been involved in it at, like, the grassroots level, right?
They are fighting rabidly for stricter observation and oversight to prevent voter fraud. If they were the ones-
Simone Collins: Oh ...
Malcolm Collins: still committing voter fraud, they wouldn’t be doing that. And the- That’s
Simone Collins: pretty damning. That’s pretty
Malcolm Collins: damning ... the louder damning thing is that the left has been fighting [00:35:00] rabidly against investigation of voter fraud.
Simone Collins: That is moderately susp- okay, more than moderately suspicious. That’s a really good point.
Malcolm Collins: Okay, that should get- Yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: not just that, but
Simone Collins: with the
Malcolm Collins: Save Our Country Act or whatever, the,
Simone Collins: we’re, we’re- That’s someone who’s like, “Hey, let’s be more careful,” and the other side being like, “No, what do you mean careful?”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. If, if I have one team out there who’s like, “We should have ID, in-person only voting,” and then another group out there that’s like, “That would be a end of American freedom,” right? Like, I’m like- Okay ... “What are you talking about?”
Simone Collins: When you put it that way, the look is not good. It’s a, it’s a bad look.
Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, so, my general takeaway from this is it’s happening. It’s probably pretty big. There isn’t a lot you can do once they capture a region. Just based on the evidence that we have access to, I mean, it seems that, like, everyone who’s involved is saying, “It’s happening, just what’s the scale,” right?
And I think the scale is probably pretty big. If you look at the, And, and here I’m not even looking at, like, the observed statistics. I’m just thinking about the number of radical leftist groups in LA that [00:36:00] don’t care a damn about the law and would have motive, means, opportunity, and time to do something like this.
If they have time to, like, stage these giant protests, somebody in the org has time to do something like this. And then I think what we learn about this is you can’t let them win, ever, right? This is the thing with, like, Nick Fuentes’ dumb strategy of like, let, g- let’s let the left win and then the right will get angry enough that it ri- Generally, when the other side l- wins, our side moderates.
That’s how it works. If you want our side to become more extreme, what you need us to do is win a number of times in a row, not lose. Because the average Republican voter doesn’t then say, “I guess we need to be more extreme.” The average Republican voter says, “I guess we need to be more moderate to pick up some of those swing voters,” right?
So, but it’s not just that. It’s that once we lose an area, when you look at the map, and I’m gonna put the two maps here,
of states where you are allowed to vote without an ID and states where Democrats [00:37:00] win or won in the last election it’s like one for one at this point, right? I think that we’re entering a place where we cannot give an inch of ground because they’re realizing that the demographics are shifting against their favor.
And there will be a point, you know, once we have the 2030 redistricting, where it essentially becomes impossible for them to win going into the future. And after that, what do you do, right? When you look at the the higher fertility rate among Republicans and we look that people vote like their parents vote, when we look at the shifting right-wing vote in the youth of these days, you know, if these trends continue this is, it’s over.
It’s game over for the left. And I think that they’re behaving in a way that seems rational to them and, and ethical to them because they believe that the right are literally Nazis. That’s why it’s important that they define it that way because it gives them what’s called a psychological license to do whatever they want to combat it[00:38:00]
Simone Collins: Yeah, okay. I, I, yes. You, you’ve also changed my view on this. It is worth covering this because it is worth to explain why it’s very important to push for voter ID laws.
Malcolm Collins: Voter ID laws, they’re never backing down. No, no election is unimportant. Not your local elections, not your national elections, every election matters.
Yeah. And if you, if you vote by mail like us to try to make it easy, just keep in mind you’re gonna have the person drive by and steal your ballot.
Simone Collins: Not great. Not great.
Malcolm Collins: But that’s, that’s you know, just, just the state of America right now and why we need to be so overwhelming in the legitimate votes that we’re putting out there.
Simone Collins: Well, friends, be careful and make sure your ID is current.
Malcolm Collins: Anyway love you, Simone. Have a fun day at the dentist, and thank you for your time
Simone Collins: Love you [00:39:00] You’re beautiful. But that should come as no surprise.
Nice one, Tex. Nice one Okay
Camera is- Mary,
Malcolm Collins: can you hear me okay?
Simone Collins: I can. However, I need a moment
Malcolm Collins: to find where my camera is.
Okay.
Here we are. Found it. Oh, no, no, no, no, you don’t. Don’t even think of it. I
do feel- I do- ... good being able to do this with you again today.
Simone Collins: I know. I, I miss it, and that’s, you know, why I -
Malcolm Collins: Oh, we got a close-up of a baby.
Simone Collins: Oh, no.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, no.
Simone Collins: Frank.
Malcolm Collins: All the women out there now need babies. [00:40:00]
Simone Collins: I don’t know. I don’t know if close-ups help or hurt.
Malcolm Collins: Got me in my pirate shirt today.
Simone Collins: No, actually-
Malcolm Collins: New, new Evil Maxx
Simone Collins: aimed ... I meant to get a proper, like, Mr. Darcy shirt. Rawr, rawr, rawr, rawr, rawr. God, Tex, I’m so sorry. Someday you’ll look back on this fondly, or not, Mr. Demaison.
Malcolm Collins: I don’t know. I, like, either I’m still with you, or the thought of losing you has destroyed me someday.
Simone Collins: What do you mean?
Malcolm Collins: Well, I wouldn’t look back on this, because I will just go talk to you.
Speaker 25: First one, actually, I’ll just light it for you
Speaker 26: Back, back. Here, Torsten.
Speaker 25: Hold it away from me so you don’t get hurt. All right, Tagan, come back. Go, go play over there. It’s gonna fall. Do not do that, Torsten. Octavian, come back here[00:41:00]
What happens if- If you w-, if you, do not let that touch anyone or it’ll hurt them Why is it going down the thing?
Titan, do not let that touch anyone or you will never get to play with these again Toasty, why are you putting it on the deck? Why? You’re burning the deck. That’s bad, Torsten. You have to hold it up in the air. It says that it might burn me. Octavian, come here. That’s why there’s the metal part at the bottom.
Speaker 28: There you go. See, look, it stops at the end right there. Can, can I try it again? All right. Go play, Octavian. When you’re done you can give it to me. What? Just never put it on the deck. It’s not burning. Oh, it’s empty. No, we’re done. We’re done? Mm-hmm. Oh, Octavian, you got yours.
What do you think, Professor?
Speaker 26: How do I know? How do I know?
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Malcolm and Simone Collins discuss a surprising realization about why many leftists accuse pronatalists of having a “breeding kink.” They explore how some in the trans community appear to structure major life decisions around arousal patterns and identity fulfillment, leading to projection onto families who have many children (often via IVF).
Topics include: why breeding kinks don’t actually drive real family-building, the difference between fantasy and daily life, identity-maxxing vs. objective function living, Techno-Puritan sins, power dynamics in kinks, furries, Lia Thomas, and much more.
This episode dives deep into psychology, sexuality, culture wars, and how different worldviews shape behavior.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. Today we are going to be talking about basically a very weird phenomenon that has happened to us repeatedly, and I didn’t understand it until today, and I had this, like, shocking realization when I was just thinking through this today, and I was like, “This explains so much of a leftist mindset that I didn’t fully understand before.”
Which is when we initially would go viral people would say, “Oh, like, why do they have to, like, bring us into their weird breeding kink?” You know, and this was a common... I, I’d say it’s, like, 1/5 or 1/8 of comments whenever we used to go viral.
We, we had a journalist come to our house recently, so, like, a trans individual who’s a journalist, and he was interviewing us or she, whatever. I, I, I never know with these people. She was interviewing us over, And by the way, if, if you’re trans and annoyed by that, just know how annoying it is for the rest of us when we can’t tell, we don’t care, and you act like it’s the biggest effing deal in the world, [00:01:00] and yet you dress and act in a way that intentionally makes it hard to tell, right?
Like, I would gender you right if it was obvious to me, right? I’m not, I’m not, like, out there actively trying to be a... But you are intentionally dressing in a way to make it difficult for me to know, right? So why am I supposed to... You’re just being a jerk to people. You have made your existence a jerky existence to other people.
But anyway, so the, the, she comes here and she gives us an interview, and in the interview she asks us something along the lines of, like... And, and this was the thesis of the interview. Like, is this all really just a kink? Like, is there a kink that’s motivating you guys to want to have lots of kids?
And I was just, like, sitting there like, does, do they really believe that, like, I would have five kids because of a kink, right? Like, the amount of my life I would have to dedicate [00:02:00] to something as simple as, like, something you masturbate to, right? Like, a, a simple arousal pattern would be genuinely astonishing to invest so much that I have five kids over it.
And I, I was just thinking today, like, do they really think that I’m doing all this? ‘Cause I was, I was, like, playing with my kids. I’m like, do they really think I have kids over a kink?
Simone Collins: Well, and then they get super, super shocked when they discover that we’ve produced all of our kids with IVF.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that we produced all of our kids with IVF.
They’re like, “Oh, that... Well, that undermines the entire thesis.” But- They they, th- which they were very confused about, right? Like it, is it... And, and, and then today I had this realization. Oh my God, I assumed that they just didn’t understand, or they were trying to cast aspersions on us, or they were trying to be edgy in some way about this.
[00:03:00] But then when I started to think about it more, I was like, but wait a second, this is a trans person. If they’re trans over a kink, which a good portion of the trans community appears to be in their own stated things. They’re like you- if you go to the, you know, trans Reddit and stuff like that, they’re like, “Well, of course, like arousal is part of this,” and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Now they have tried to define it as not a kink, tried to define it, but if you look at the actual written experiences of trans people going through gender transition many of them talk about it as something that is partially arousing to them. This is incredibly well documented in trans people talking about their own lives, right?
And in addition to this, we have entire trans communities where when you ‘cause I actually read like the Transmaxer Manifesto, right? Trying to get people to Transmax. And this is clearly a, a, a gender transition modification transformation kink in, in, in even the way it’s structured. It’s like, wouldn’t it be so hot if X, Y, and Z, and D, right?
You know. So [00:04:00] I read through these things a- and I’m like, if this person transitioned over partially an arousal pattern, yeah, that’s actually how they live, right? They really are living their entire life, their entire reproductive future, which I guess to me, I think of as like one of the core impacts you have with your life, was decided potentially downstream of an arousal pattern.
And I saw this and I was like... I had just never considered to take what they were saying at face value. It just seemed so insane to me that an individual could say all of this, that it didn’t enter my mind as, no, they might actually mean this. And I think once we accept that yes, they do actually mean that, you can begin to understand so many other things about modern [00:05:00] leftist philosophy.
Thoughts before I go further, Simone?
Simone Collins: No, although I am curious if this ties in with your concept of the techno-puritan sin of, of living to fulfill an identity versus living to maximize an objective function.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, I think it’s, it’s both. I mean, transness is obviously it breaks, like, all of our sins.
I mean, one, they’re living to fulfill an identity and other people’s perception of them, which I see the fundamentally fai- vain way to live. You can just, you know, choose to live however you wanna live, right? And, and say, “What matters is my effect on the world, not whether or not I appear a certain way in other people’s minds.”
Like, obsessing over that, we argue is sinful, where sinfulness are just things that f**k up your life in the long run. But second it’s sinful in that it’s... And, and I think that it- it- it’s, it’s living your entire life after an arousal pattern. Like, we don’t even, we don’t even put into our sins living your whole life in the pursuit of [00:06:00] happiness because we say happiness is a choice, right?
So you don’t need to pursue it. It’s something that you should sort of grab and subdue. You choose how you interpret the things around you in life. And when you realize that this sort of, like, higher form of happiness, like am I content with myself, am I moving forward, that it’s a choice, well, then the only sorts of happiness you have are the basal forms of happiness.
You know, this is, like, eating whatever food you want all day, every day, right? Or just having constant orgies or engaging in huge life-changing behavior to fulfill arousal patterns, right? Which are just a, a basal sort of breeding thing in the background of all human biology that really shouldn’t affect any sort of a daily choice.
And this is where it all got really interesting for me. Because if I am listing, like, my unusual arousal patterns or kinks or anything like that and I have argued in the past that a breeding fetish is about the only thing in the world that is not actually a fetish.
Simone Collins: Right.
Malcolm Collins: [00:07:00] It’s what the entire arousal system is built to get you to do.
About anything else that arouses you is ancillary and something misfiring.
Simone Collins: All non-procreative sex is a fetish. Or some kind of weird kink, I guess.
Malcolm Collins: But anyway, of my list of, like, things that really turn me on, the wider category of breeding fetish content is actually one of those things for me. It’s not my top thing but it’s probably number two.
But with
Simone Collins: that being- Well, based on its popularity, like, if you look at just sort of top ranked tags and stuff in erotic material, for men specifically, that’s kind of the thing. In women, I just don’t see it that much, actually, for, like, female content, which is interesting.
Malcolm Collins: And do you not see it a lot in female content?
Mm. I mean, sort of being forced to breed you see in female content, like, Not
Simone Collins: really,
Malcolm Collins: actually ... in The Handmaid’s Tale and stuff like that, like the-
Simone Collins: No. Because even then if you actually look at the [00:08:00] books most or most if not many of the men are themselves infertile, so-
Malcolm Collins: Oh, really?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, like, there are issues with, like, some of the doctors being like, “Well, I will.
I will inseminate you ‘cause I know for a fact this guy is infertile and he doesn’t know it. But, you know, you should just therefore let me F you,” and then, yeah. So it’s, it’s a whole thing, actually. Wait, but
Malcolm Collins: isn’t that a kink in itself? Isn’t that part of the breeding kink?
Simone Collins: No, I don’t think so. Yeah, anyway, I, I don’t- Does,
Malcolm Collins: does, does she go with
Simone Collins: the doctor?
Does she- In Handmaid’s Tale I just don’t think that... I haven’t read the books. I, I only know from, like, some summaries and stuff that I’ve heard.
Malcolm Collins: Of what?
Simone Collins: But, like, there’s not a lot of actually getting pregnant going on. Like, some, some of the ancillary characters go through pregnancies and stuff, but-
Malcolm Collins: I guess it, it, it, like, once you get pregnant and have a kid, all of the sexy stuff after that
Simone Collins: begins to- Pregnancy is, yeah, that’s, that, that is where for m- m- maybe a majority of women, I don’t know, like, sort of arousal and, and, like, stuff being sexy just dies with [00:09:00] pregnancy and with newborns being around.
So typically with female erotic material, it is, there are-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but especially if it’s, like, multi-books ... no
Simone Collins: children around.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Like, if she gets pregnant in book one and now in book two she’s raising a newborn, like, all of the other sexy stuff starts to get weird.
Simone Collins: Well, and you have to keep in mind pregnancy is while a beautiful thing, often very uncomfortable.
Like, you’re not aroused when you want to vomit. You’re not aroused when you have intense nerve pain. You are not aroused when you feel incredibly large and when your- Right ... legs are swollen and when you look like, you know, a, a watermelon, right? Like, noth- there’s nothing. Like, now first, I’m sure there’s always exceptions, right?
I’m sure there’s some women who feel incredibly sexy and have really high sex drive and everything when they’re pregnant and when they have newborns and whatever, right? Like, all these things are possible. However no. Like, and I’ve, I’m, I’ve c- I’ve consumed, like, so much erotic material both targeted at men and targeted at women.
Women, it’s power dynamics. It’s getting high-powered men. It’s high-status men. It’s and, and, [00:10:00] and a lot of, like, just the more general focus i- like, really hot men, Yeah ... men who’ve always had a crush on them, men who really like pleasuring them. It’s never, “I’m going to get you pregnant.” Like, that actually if anything could possibly be on average a turn-off for women, which is really interesting.
Yeah. Yeah, so- but yeah, I, I do not, like, it’s super common in male-oriented stuff, not in female-oriented stuff.
Malcolm Collins: That, that makes sense. That makes sense. So the, point I was getting to here is even as somebody who like would just admit if you consider the idea of impregnation being hot a kink, right? Or your partner being pregnant a kink, right?
Like, I, I always think she looks better when she’s pregnant. If you consider that a kink and I’m saying me, even as somebody who would have both of those things being in like my kink category, they have never activated around my actual children’s birth, right? Like-
Simone Collins: That’s true, yeah.
Malcolm Collins: They, they have [00:11:00] never, because I don’t like, even
Simone Collins: me- Well, no, and then I, I will point out, and this is maybe getting a little bit too TMI, but like even before we realized we had to do IVF and we were just, you know, timing and trying to get pregnant naturally- Yeah
like it actually felt kind of unsexy to, when we were actually trying to get pregnant- Oh, oh ... ‘cause it was like, oh God, this is like the ovulatory window, like we have to do it now. And
Malcolm Collins: like- I, no, I completely agree. It was- Yeah ... really unsexy. Like-
Simone Collins: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: having sex to conceive is like-
Simone Collins: Stressful and not sexy
Malcolm Collins: yes, you’re on a schedule.
Simone Collins: Super
Malcolm Collins: not sexy. You’ve gotta work it into unusual times.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: You’ve gotta like, it is, it is
Simone Collins: actively- It’s typically like women aggressively like when men aren’t ready for it, being like, “I need you to like come inside me now,” and like just getting really intense about it. And like I, you, you, like even I remember your, m- again, not TMI, but like I remember your dad at a steakhouse being like, “Yeah, like it was really stressful when your mom was trying to conceive ‘cause she’d just be like call me up and be like, ‘You have to come home from work now.’”
And like, just like it’s not [00:12:00] fun for the men. Like it’s very clearly not fun for anyone involved.
Malcolm Collins: It’s, it’s not. But I’m, the point I’m making here is even with somebody with all of the layered kinks that could be associated with a breeding kink, right? Mm-hmm. Never was that process unusually arousing for me.
Mm. If anything, it went in the exact opposite direction. Because-
Simone Collins: Ironically ...
Malcolm Collins: it, it fell into, and this might have been a competing like anti-kink I have of, of the long procedures and everything like that- ... and a lot of you know-
Simone Collins: Anti-kink ...
Malcolm Collins: but whatever the point being is it never- Yeah ... influenced me or wanting to have kids.
Even though I may feel like my wife looks even more beautiful when she’s pregnant-
Simone Collins: Aw ...
Malcolm Collins: right? That would never, ever in a billion years factor into my decision to get her pregnant. Because that’s just like a minor modification into how attractive I find her. Maybe like a I find her 10, 20% more attractive for nine months, and then- She has [00:13:00] a child I need to raise for the rest of my life.
Simone Collins: Right. Like, and then, and then 18 years and she-
Malcolm Collins: That would be f*****g insane.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
And just to hammer this home further, even though I find her more physically attractive when she is heavily pregnant, I do not have sex. We do not have sex when she is heavily pregnant. And people can be like, “Oh, it’s totally safe for the baby,” whatever. I’m like, “Mm, actually, there have been cases where baby has, have died or suffered injuries during it.”
It is incredibly rare, but it is absolutely possible. Um, and I would never in a million years forgive myself. In a million years. Imagine you knew that. Like, I, I’m not going to do something where I might have to live with the fact for the rest of my life that I know I killed one of my kids because I wanted to get off, and she couldn’t even get pregnant that day.
What are you talking about? That’s so disgusting. Um, I, I know some people are like, “Well, I just wouldn’t have sex if I [00:14:00] couldn’t have sex with my wife all the time when she’s preg-” Whatever. Okay? I’m just pointing out here that it’s actually instances in which I cannot have sex with her because I’m worried about the safety of my children.
Even if it’s a one point zero zero zero one thing, I’m not taking that chance
Malcolm Collins: That would be absolutely insane.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: But then weirder than, and I, and I actually, like, I want to communicate this to these people, and I w- I, when I originally was thinking through this, I was like, well, think of it this way.
Like, even if you have like some BDSM related kinks. Personally I’m aroused by being in a dominant position when I’m with my partner. We’re like getting a list of kinks I have today. Oh,
Simone Collins: boy. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: I’m aroused. I have never been aroused by being a boss, right? I have never been aroused by having to fire someone.
I have never been aroused- ... by being in a real world position of authority over someone.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: For the vast majority of kinks, to activate them, you need to engage in scenarios that are so [00:15:00] divorced from anything that actually happens in real life that they’re not gonna accidentally activate during normal daily stuff.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: And I think a, a lot of people would get this, right? Like, when I talk about the BDSM thing, most people, I think most people probably have some level of arousal to submission or dominance.
Simone Collins: Yeah. I mean, that, in, in our research, that was just so- Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: like
Simone Collins: the
Malcolm Collins: vast- ... pervasive. So if you’re one of our followers and you’re aroused by submission or dominance, have you ever actually been aroused by, like, being someone else’s employee-
or being someone else’s boss? Yeah, someone’s
Simone Collins: like, “Go clean the toilets.” Oh, yes. Say that again, slowly.
Malcolm Collins: Y- you’re like a f- yeah I mean, surely somebody is. But I realized- Yes ... what’s different for me in them-
Simone Collins: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: is there are ways that some people with submission fetishes or dominance f- fetishes relate to being an employee or boss that [00:16:00] is sexualized.
Like, we do see people engaging in relationships with their boss where, like, that’s clearly a component to it. No,
Simone Collins: but that’s, it, it’s the power dynamic. It’s not the bossing, it’s the, the fact that he is the boss and I’m the secretary. And there are definitely plenty of female fantasies around that in terms of, like, the material that’s popular.
That is certainly common in female- Or- ... or in general erotic material ... you see this in the
Malcolm Collins: case of, like, teacher-student, right? Like, where a teacher is in a relationship.
Simone Collins: Yeah, no, teacher-student, boss, and... Well, and, and you see it w- with male erotic materials, too. A common one, of course, is nurse, right? It’s, it’s one of those places where it’s acceptable for a man- Well, no,
Malcolm Collins: but that,
Simone Collins: the,
Malcolm Collins: the point I’m making is I’m not talking about in erotic material, I’m talking about in real life stuff.
Simone Collins: Oh, sure. Or- Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But what I realized is that these people who are actually aroused because of this position they have relative to somebody who they are the boss of- Hmm ... or who are in a submissive position because they’re [00:17:00] somebody’s employee, they relate to their daily duties in a way that is totally foreign to the way I relate to my daily duties.
Simone Collins: Oh, sure.
Malcolm Collins: It would never accidentally arouse me to be somebody’s teacher, right? I would never mistake that for this other type of relationship.
Simone Collins: Yeah, good point.
Malcolm Collins: And then I realized, oh my God, it’s not just in those instances. It’s also likely in the instances of how these people like the whole trans thing, the, the idea that, like- Oh, well you couldn’t possibly just do something every day all day that’s primarily intended to arouse you, right?
The idea of transition itself as being in that category, right? It’s like this is why they do all this weird fetishy stuff all the time that I have found so confusing, right? Mm-hmm. Like, I’ve always been like why, why, why do we have, Who is the, the, the swimmer? [00:18:00] The trans swimmer? Lia
Simone Collins: Thomas.
Malcolm Collins: Lia Thomas.
I always talk about Lia Thomas. I’m like, why did the trans community support her flashing male genitals at girls in the girls’ locker room when neither male or female locker rooms is it normal to fully undress yourself, and it hasn’t been for the past 20 years. It wasn’t when I was in school. It’s definitely not today, and we’ve been drifting further in that direction.
So that means that this is somebody who is intentionally flashing people. I was like, why did the trans community make this person a role model for the community, stand this individual, make them the figurehead when they were clearly acting in a way that I would think is a bad action? And then I realized I didn’t understand it.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: Lia Thomas made every moment about what aroused her. Walking into the locker room and being like, “I am gonna make my entire life a sexualized reframing,” is actually very, very normal to people with this mindset [00:19:00] And I’ll note here, I think we see this in the conservative side as well. In the conservatives who are just doing this conservative LARP and don’t seem to have actual, like, values.
They’re just like, “I’m the most conservative person out there.” And that’s why when people try to, like, front on you with this stuff, like, “Oh, I’m more conservative ‘cause I’m more...” whatever thing they wanna push on you. Like, “I hate the gays more, the Jews more,” the, you know. And it’s like, come on, the communists did that stuff, too.
You’re bad at being a conservative. You’re an idiot conservative. But the, the the conservatives who, who go with that, “I’m a more trad version of a Christian. You’re just, like, really involved in being a scripture nerd. So, like, what are you? Some nerd about study- the trying to get the exact right words in a way that makes sense?
Why can’t you just believe whatever I was told Christianity was when I was growing up?” And I’m like, “Well, because I actually wanna believe what’s true.” And they’re not interested in what’s true. They’re interested in what fits this theming, and then we see it affect in their actions. [00:20:00] Like the couple, the famous conservative couple where their marriage was blessed by the Pope and she was cheating with her boss the whole time, right?
Simone Collins: Blessed by the Pope.
Malcolm Collins: Blessed by
Simone Collins: the Pope. Apparently, though, there, it’s... What, what happened actually in that case is apparently you can, like, show up in a certain place when you get married, like, at, at, at, in the Va- in Vatican City, and the Pope will be there and, like, bless a bunch of people all at once.
So it’s not like they made some kind of special appointment with him. They like- Well,
Malcolm Collins: right, but
Simone Collins: it
Malcolm Collins: was
Simone Collins: still a very performative- ... showed up. It’s like showing up at a Mardi Gras parade and getting Mardi Gras beads thrown at you. Just, just to, like, put that in context for
Malcolm Collins: our listeners. No, no, no, no. I, I, I...
Look, and again, I wouldn’t even... As much as I might be anti-Catholic, I’m not gonna besmirch the Pope for accidentally blessing somebody who wasn’t true to their belief system, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: He had
Simone Collins: no way of knowing. Well, plus with the Catholic Church there’s always redemption, so don’t worry about it.
Malcolm Collins: Right, right.
But I’m just saying even, even if it was personally organized, I would still... That, that’s not... But the point is is it was still a big show of, “Look at [00:21:00] how X I am.” Mm. And what I realize is that actually when you live your life based around maximizing an identity rather than a consequentialist value system, you can be aroused by these sorts of positions even if you’re a conservative, right?
Mm. The reason why a teacher may be aroused by being in the role of a teacher relative to a student or the role of a boss relative to their employee is because they are maximizing and they identify as teacher. That’s what they’re doing. I’m trying to be the most teachery teacher right now. And so that allows me to, if, if that’s what’s hitting the arousal pathway, then that hits it for me, right?
But if I’m going out there and as a boss, as I’ve always done as a boss, my job is to make money for my investors, right? Like, never, and, and, and not screw over customers and not screw over my employees, but like that’s always the calculation running in my head. It’s [00:22:00] never, “I’m a boss.” I, I can do the, you know, I’m a, I’m a boss song here.
Speaker 9: Direct workflow. Like a boss. My own bathroom. Like a boss. Micromanage. Like a boss. Promote synergy. Like a boss.
Malcolm Collins: But like I, yeah, I’m never thinking like, “I’m the bossiest boss.”
Speaker 2: Hey, I’m Buddy. I’m the boss.
That’s my sister, Grace. She’s not the boss. I’m the boss.
Malcolm Collins: I’m the boss.” But anyway, for making, about making cakes. But anyway it, it’s never how I perceive myself in those moments. I’m just a tool of trying to achieve a specific outcome.
And I realize that I think many progressives, so there’s sort of two people here who get sucked into this in ways that were, one, before foreign to me, but now make a lot more sense. One is the progressives who just like intentionally are pleasure maxing their lives.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And, and I think you see this sometimes as conservatives, but it’s fairly rare.
Just like the [00:23:00] only thing I live for is what arouses me and what makes me feel good. Yeah. And if, if, and these people can fall into various categories. Obviously if they are most impacted by arousal systems, they may go down the trans pathway, they may go down some other lifestyle pathway, like the furry pathway or something like that.
Simone Collins: The furry pathway.
Malcolm Collins: Or they may go down, you know, all these various things that they could go down. And actually this is an interesting point to me, which is really important for me in terms of how I see something like furries. When people tried to, the left tried to take Lola Bunny and make Lola Bunny less sexy, there was a big online outrage that predominantly happened on the right.
And what that showed me is A lot of people find anthro characters attractive, right? Like apparently this is normalized enough that like right-wing influencers were like, “How dare you desexualize Lola Bunny?”
Simone Collins: Is this true? I mean, it just... They, they made a humanoid character sexy. Like, [00:24:00] how is that... A sexy character- Well, so the point I’m making here-
that’s humanoid is sexy. Like I, how is that... It’s not like people are into animals
Malcolm Collins: The point I’m making... Well, yeah, they dr- that’s what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to make the character activate the part of your brain, for at least people without very strict counter systems look like a slightly modified version of a human.
Yeah. And because people like diversity in sexual partners, which we’ve actually seen from genetic selection events that happened in environments where mate selection was really important, like in Northern Europe. We have another episode where we go more into this, like are redheads monster girls.
But like, in
Simone Collins: these- Forgot about
Malcolm Collins: that ... in these environments you begin to have these really unusual dimorphic traits, like bright red hair and different eye colors. Which by the way you don’t have in most of the world. You do not have varying hair colors, you do not have varying eye colors. You only have these in these very explicit Northern European environments.
Mm-hmm. And because of that, or that just shows me that, you know, [00:25:00] historically, at least within populations that I’m related to liking somebody who looked in some way novel. Like a ginger looks very novel. Mm-hmm. You know, to, to a, a Roman, you bring a red-headed ginger in and th- they wouldn’t look any more different from the average human woman than a, a girl with horns or elf ears.
In fact they probably would’ve looked more different from the average human woman to a Roman who captured a red-headed slave with, with, that was a ginger than your average elf in fantasy fiction looks to your average human in fantasy fiction. But the point I was making here is that there is something very different from just saying like, “Oh, something’s arousing to me.”
Like, that’s a category of like anthro figures is arousing to me, and being a furry. Because it’s how you’re relating to this arousal pathway. Mm-hmm.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: When you’re a furry you’re saying, “This is going to be my identity. I’m gonna go to cons around this, I’m gonna invest a ton of money in this, I’m gonna incorporate [00:26:00] this thing that arouses me into my core idea of who I am.”
And I would say of, of the list of techno-puritan sins, let’s definitely add this one as, like, one of the higher sins you can commit of, of trying to incorporate a, an arousal pathway. Well,
Simone Collins: no, I think trying to incorporate any emotional pathway into your identity is- Right.
Malcolm Collins: True ...
Simone Collins: toxic. It- that’s not the point.
Your identity should be something that is meant to maximize your objective function. That’s it.
Malcolm Collins: Yes. But there are two, ... Well, by the way, for people, when she talks about objective function, that means the things that you believe have intrinsic value. Mm-hmm. Like a weighted list of things you think are good for humanity or that you’re commanded to do by God or, you know, whatever else, right?
Like, you have a, a, a thing that you as a human are made to do, and you believe that, right? Mm-hmm. And even, even if you think the thing that you’re meant to do as a human is maximize your own pleasure- Pursuing [00:27:00] pleasure in the way that these communities do rarely maximizes your own pleasure. Actually, like let’s look at furries as an example of this.
If you look at the suicidality risk you look at the unaliving risk among furries, it’s incredibly high. You look at the depression risk, it’s incredibly high. When you do this form of hedonism maxing, it ends up eating away at your actual contentedness because it’s just not how humans were designed to live.
Mm-hmm. It’s like even if I enjoy candy, if I do nothing but eat candy every day for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, I am going to feel much worse. You know, like pleasure maxing, even though candy make me feel good, candy not route to long-term pleasure maxing.
Simone Collins: Well, in fact, when it, when we discussed like is there a cure for gay in The Pragmatist’s Guide to Sexuality, from what we could see in the research, the only way you could really make someone not want [00:28:00] to indulge in any same-sex activity is to just inundate them so much with gay sex that they like just can’t take anymore.
Malcolm Collins: No, no now obviously same sex attracted people can suppress this arousal pathway. Yeah. Right? Like, there’s arousal pathways I suppress all the time, but the, the point I’m making here is we’re, we’re building out three categories. So category one is the people who are captured by an identity, and this identity can be tied to an arousal pathway or not.
Mm-hmm. But I think even if you don’t go into it as tied to an arousal pathway, like the Christian influencer who saw himself as like a boss or a superior to this person, and like the big tough Christian influencer guy, he became captured by this identity in a way that ended up trow- triggering arousal pathways that made him move against his core moral thesis, right?
Or his objective function as we would say. But then the second category is the true I’m gonna eat candy every day person, and this is, this is where you get, you know, the, [00:29:00] the haze influencer. This is where you get the healthy at every size people. This is where you get the ex- the, the trans extremists, right?
Where it’s just I’m gonna live my entire life based around whatever can make me... This is where you get the people crashing out on Twitter because the government won’t give them, Pre, pre... We had a whole episode. It was one of our craziest- Oh, PrEP. PrEP, yeah. We learned about how much the government pays on PrEP, which is only useful if you’re having orgies.
Like if you have a, a monogamous partner, because of how good anti-AIDS medication is now, but PrEP’s just largely
Simone Collins: irrelevant. Well, yeah. So not, not exactly orgies, but more specifically, like, a lot of one-off partners, new partners who you can’t really vet who you can’t necessarily trust to say, “Yeah, I’m taking the correct medication,” et cetera.
Yeah. Then that’s what PrEP is for. Yeah, it’s for, like, the most unsafe and irresponsible form of sex that you could have, regardless of your orientation. And the fact that the government’s paying for that is somewhat annoying.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, no, government isn’t paying for it, you’re [00:30:00] paying for it. You, the viewer of Base Camp, are paying for it.
Simone Collins: Well, if you live in the United States, yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I think most of Europe gives PrEP too, for free. You
Simone Collins: think? Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: You know. Thanks. De- definitely need to cut PrEP. And people are like, “Well, the, these people can’t control them. They should be able to control themselves.” And then they’re like, “And what if they get AIDS?
And we shouldn’t pay for that either, then they can die,” right? Like, w- w- whatever can happen to consequences, right? Like, don’t do X thing because it can lead to Y thing, right? Like, that should be on them to know, “Oh, gee, I shouldn’t have the orgy. I should just step back from the orgy,” right? Like, a little less orgying.
But yeah thoughts, Simone?
Simone Collins: Yeah. I, I’m, I’m trying to reconcile this in my head with the stated purpose of becoming trans, which is, you know, you feel like you’re born in the wrong body, and you’re just trying to resolve severe body [00:31:00] dysmorphia. The, the mainstream opinion on the left, as I understand it, is that this has nothing to do with your sexuality and it has everything to do with who you feel you are, which I guess we would probably say is a misnomer.
Like, your identity doesn’t matter anyway. It doesn’t matter who you are. You should just make the most of whatever you’ve been dealt and optimize it around your objective function. And if you’re suddenly born tomorrow, or, like, you wake up tomorrow and you’re totally different, it’s not like, “Okay, well, I need to fix, fix this to, to how I feel.
I need to just live,” like, and, “Okay, this is my body now,” like, “Okay, now I’m a rabbit person. Okay, then I’ll just do that.” In fact, I think you could argue that everyone has to do this throughout their lives, because one day you’re gonna wake up and you’re gonna be 40. And I think a lot of people are, like, trans young, right?
Like, they’re 40, and they act like they’re 12. And that’s just not, not ideal. You know, they should be leveraging the identity that they’ve woken up [00:32:00] in, in an optimal way. And I think- Nevertheless what the argument is with identity and, and being trans is that they feel like they’re in the body of someone with a different n- natal sex, and they have to fix that.
That it has nothing to do with sex. And I’m
Malcolm Collins: trying to- Yeah, nobody ever, like, the, the, it’s, it’s like, it, it’s very normal to not feel like you’re an adult, right? Like, this is a normal thing. Just because I don’t feel like- Yeah,
Simone Collins: or to not want to be an adult. Like, I mean, all the women who are getting elective cosmetic procedures to look younger are trans young.
You know? They, they are also getting gender affirming surgery and, and youth affirming surgery.
Malcolm Collins: Well, and identity affirming surgery,
Simone Collins: right? Uh-huh, exactly, which again, we would say is sinful. But I don’t, I, for, for women, I, m- many would, you could argue, oh, they’re doing it for sex ‘cause they wanna attract partners.
I don’t think they’re doing it for sex. I, so I don’t know if, if the trans thing is really about sex. I mean, so I’m trying to parse that out. ‘Cause also there’s this very common thing in, in, like, trans [00:33:00] discourse to say, “No, being trans is not expressing autogynephilia. They’re totally different things.”
There’s almost this, like, disavowal of people with autogynephilia. Like, it’s not a sex thing.
Malcolm Collins: There, there is not at all a disavowal in the actual trans community. So, this is something that they, that they signal very loudly to outsiders. But to insiders, it’s widely accepted.
Simone Collins: Okay, but you don’t deny that it’s signaled loudly to outsiders.
Malcolm Collins: No, it is signaled loudly to outsiders, but if you actually hang out on their forums, they’ll talk about this arousing them all the time. In fact, there was even a giant fight within the trans community like 10, 20 years ago, so, like even before it blew up between the the people who said, “Being trans is about gender dysphoria,” and these were called true scum, and the people who said, “No, being trans is about whatever I want,” which is the people who are called the two Qs.
And the whatever I want, while it often wasn’t explicitly laid out, was generally autogynephilia. Or some [00:34:00] form of kink or arousal pathway, right? Like, if they, that, that was well understood if you look at the leaders of the whatever I want community and the stuff that they were caught with, whenever they had leaks or anything like that, right?
You know. But yeah. What was the point you were making around this? I mean, my, my point is, like, the, the community- That
Simone Collins: it’s not about sex. That you’re saying, well, a breed- people who have a lot of kids don’t have a breeding kink. But people who are trans have a kink that they’re exercising every day, which is why they think that people who have a lot of kids have a, a breeding kink.
And I’m trying to push back and say, “I don’t know. I don’t know if people who are trans think it’s very sexual at all either.” In fact, I would argue that especially people who are- Read the forums ... male to female trans are, if anything, experiencing a significant drop in sexual arousal because it’s testosterone- They, we just read a thread about this yesterday
that’s the huge sex driver, and they’re, like, trying to kind of nuke that out. Have
Malcolm Collins: you read, have you read or spent any time reading, like, the trans subreddit or any community which would- Not
Simone Collins: in a very long time, to be fair ... talk to other
Malcolm Collins: [00:35:00] trans
Simone Collins: people? Not for a
Malcolm Collins: long time.
Simone Collins: It’s,
Malcolm Collins: it’s very common to talk about this in those communities, and they are not shamed for talking about this in those communities.
Simone Collins: Mm.
Malcolm Collins: It is seen as a normal part of transition, and people would say it’s very wrong to shame somebody for being aroused due to something tied to their transition. And they’ll always say, “Well, like, of course we don’t signal this to outsiders, but within the community, we know what’s up.” Right? Like, I think that to, to over-buy into this externalized like the too cute versus true scum war obviously happened.
If you do a, an internet search, it obviously happened. It’s, it, it, it’s one of the biggest parts or cultural fights within the growth of modern leftism and the movement that came out of Tumblr, right? And pretty much no one denies that the, the true scum lost. True scum now are seen as adjacent to TERFs, right?
Like, they’re, they’re seen as sort of similar in the same way that, like, [00:36:00] TERFs were sloughed off by the feminist movement as the wrong kind of feminists, the true scum were sloughed off by the trans movement as the wrong kind of trans. So I, I think that y- yeah, they’re aware that this is for them, and this actually even came up in the conversation with the journalist.
And I was like, “You know, obviously I wouldn’t wanna live my entire life just to maximize the amount of pleasure I, I, I s- feel.” And they said something along the lines of, “Well, you know, speak for yourself,” implying that, like, this is actually how they structure their life.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: So even in that context, Simone, you saw the individual doing this.
Simone Collins: That’s fair. That is fair. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: So I think that the, the, the thing is, is even if, or the, the wider context here, even if somebody has all of the fetishes around th- that presumably this lifestyle should be activating, it doesn’t work to activate them. It’s a very ineffective way. If you out there as an individual are [00:37:00] thinking, “I wanna have a lot of kids because of a fetish,” there’s places for that.
There’s, like known sperm dono networks appear to be primarily fetishes from what I’ve seen.
Simone Collins: Oh. Yeah, that’s true. That is true. Yeah, the people who just make themselves available for sperm donation. Totally.
Malcolm Collins: That seems to be about a breeding kink. I like Elon. What he’s doing seems to be partially potentially motivated by a breeding kink.
Just the way that he’s doing it. Instead of doing it all with one woman and surrogates, which he could do if he wanted to he does it with lots of women who he treats as disposable, which is often part of a breeding kink, right? So that looks like... I- I know he doesn’t treat all of them as dispo- but some of them he clearly does.
Like, it’s like I hit up a girl on Twitter, she’s interested, I impregnate her. There’s other ways he could achieve the same scale with significantly less legal liability with the money that he has, right? So there’s something motivating this outside of just logic. That said, maybe he’s, like, ideologically [00:38:00] against using using w- w- what’s the word?
Simone Collins: Surrogates?
Malcolm Collins: Surrogates. Yeah, ideologically against surrogates. No. No? Okay. So, yeah. ‘
Simone Collins: Cause he’s known to have used surrogates, so.
Speaker: Like if I had Elon level money, I would have a, uh, uh, like a facility in some third world country, like in India, I don’t know, South America, Brazil, something like that. Um, that’d be like Ender’s Game, raising like 50 kids per year, , in the best conditions I could afford for them, but at scale. , Which is obviously very different than the path Elon has taken
Malcolm Collins: Or maybe it allows him to operate at a scale that, like, even we’re unaware of that would make this make sense. I don’t know. But the point I’m making here is- is that the- the breeding kink is generally not tied to and then you raise a family of like 10 kids.
Very
Simone Collins: true. And
Malcolm Collins: I, and I, and I’d actually point this out to the trans community, like the trans community that is watching this and crashing out over me saying this. You kn- you kn- like, breeding kinks are common in the trans community. Like for example, Ana Valens had a, a [00:39:00] breeding kink. Remember? She wanted to like, she, she- There were,
Simone Collins: there were so many.
There were so many things ...
Malcolm Collins: This is a writer who w- dunked on Leaflet and Kirschner. But anyway, so Ana Valens was like, “Oh, I have this fantasy where I free use women and impregnate them.” Like, that means just having sex with lots of women and impregnating them. Oh. And then tran- trans women should have free access to cis women to just use them and impregnate them.
Now, this is clearly a breeding kink, but it is antithetical to and then I raise those kids. It’s, it’s the exact opposite of that. Breeding kinks are, at least from what I’ve seen in terms of like what’s out there, almost always tied to and then I move on.
Simone Collins: It’s almost more a correlated with sneaky copulation than it is Like anything you do with a partner, a long-term partner, pure bond partner Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Where that stuff is often much more motivated by “I really like kids and let’s make the kids,” right? Like that’s, [00:40:00] that’s the point of the sex, and then the sex is all schedules and everything like that. And as we’ve said, then you, then you basically get to a point where, you know, having a nanny is just like a prostitute by proxy, right?
Because- Yeah.
Simone Collins: It, it might be different for religious couples who are just open to having kids, meaning that like every time you have sex, you’re not necessarily trying to have kids. You know, God chooses, right? Jesus takes the wheel on that front, and then it’s not stressful in that way because you’re not trying to make it happen.
You’re just open to it happening when it’s meant to happen.
Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm.
Simone Collins: In which case perhaps then it’s- More s- of a turn-on for the... I don’t know. Because I b- they also like, people who are you know, open, open to having kids and, and having families in that sort of very natural way tend to also not talk about what arouses them and their sex lives.
So who knows what’s going on in their heads, right? Like-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well- ...
Simone Collins: who knows if they find it a turn-on or not. But I [00:41:00] think what, when you also look at just sort of how it’s described biblically, like becoming one, which really just means, like, as we interpret it, combining your genetics with someone and basically taking what feels like to us shards of our soul and, and, like, seeing them in children combined.
You know, really you see yourself, both of yourselves in one person after you have a kid, in that person. You do become one in that kid. I think that’s more, like, where you see the expression of love. It’s not really in the sex act itself or the sex act itself- Well, I also know here where- ... has more to do with sort of increasing-
a
Malcolm Collins: trans person may push back and say, “Well, it’s not just breeding kinks.” You know, you say that the breeding kink is never associated with a wanting to raise a child, right? And they’re like, “Well, what about, like, daddy dom little girl stuff,” right? You know, that’s tied to wanting to raise a child, and I push back super hard on that.
I, I would bet even, even people maybe we could get Shu on head sometime because we know that she was into this kink for a [00:42:00] while and now has a kid. I would bet to anybody who’s ever been into that kink, th- this is not one of the kinks I’m into but for anybody who’s ever been into that kink, having their own kids has never been arousing to them.
Like interacting- Yeah ... with their own kids. A, a, a one, the western mark effect is super strong. That’s the thing that makes you unaroused by anyone who sort of is growing up around you at certain developmental milestones. But in addition to the western mark effect which is usually with siblings, but also affects parents, because I mean, there, there, there is something that tells you and needs to tell you from a biological perspective people can have hot daughters.
Like, people can have daughters that are just objectively attractive, and you need to know at some sort of internal level, “Oh, I shouldn’t be procreating with this thing that happens to be
Simone Collins: my daughter.” That system doesn’t seem to work in everyone.
Malcolm Collins: And when you... Well, no. Where people end up with their daughters most frequently, it’s because you’re also more attracted to people you’re genetically related to, is when the father didn’t raise the daughter.
Oh. And this one we actually see [00:43:00] quite frequently is when a daughter raised by
Simone Collins: a dad gets called. Yeah. And, and when, when you have people raised separately because they both have the same, like, father through IVF ‘cause their, their father is a prolific sperm donor.
Malcolm Collins: Right. But, but even more than that is when the dad, like, divorced the mom young or something like that anyway.
Simone Collins: Sure. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: We’re not gonna talk about that right now. The point I’m making here is the daddy dom little girl fetish is very obviously to me in the category of fetishes of power exchange. This would be the ex- same as, like, a nurse fetish or a teacher fetish or, like, a I’m in control over you in some other way fetish and you have less control than me.
This is about signaling submission and dominance, which is not actually something you do with your kids very frequently. I, I think that people would be surprised about that. Signals of dominance are just not a part of n- normal interaction you have with your kids because there’s almost this, like, intuitive understanding with children, until they’re teenagers at least, and that’s, you know, that’s a whole other thing, right?
[00:44:00] That the, the parent is in the authoritative position that it doesn’t need to be signaled. It’s not, it’s
Simone Collins: not part of your relationship. Well, it, basically if you have to signal it, that means you’ve, you’ve failed already, right? Like, you know, the, it’s a show, don’t tell kind of thing.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yeah. So, that, that was sort of my wider thought.
It, it just made me realize, like, oh my God, they actually see the world this way, and I had just always bro- brushed it off as, like, a-
Simone Collins: Yeah, very confusing. Yeah. Genuinely ...
Malcolm Collins: it was either confusing or, like, they didn’t... And, and they’re, oh, you know they’ll clip this and see, like, he admits it, that, you know, the whole breeding fetish thing is something that, that turns him on.
I mean, yeah, of course. It’s what the entire arousal system is meant for. But I also have been very clear, and I think we’ll get other people in the comments who will mention this around whatever fetish they’ve experienced, that there is a big deal difference between something that is a conceptual fetish and something that’s [00:45:00] going to be accidentally activated by your daily life.
Mm-hmm ... and I doubt... I, I, w- w- I mean, one of the easy ones, ‘cause this is even... Anyone who’s into, like, the daddy dom thing ever accidentally been aroused by that with one of their kids, right? Like, presumably it should, if it, that’s the actual system you’re trying to activate. But I don’t think it is. It’s the authority figure non-authority figure system, which isn’t really the relationship you have with your kids.
The relationship I have with my kids is nothing like the relationship I’d have with, like, a pupil or something like that.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. No. That’s, it’s a good point. I’m, I’m glad you brought it up, ‘cause that, that has always kind of befuddled me, and I’m just like, I don’t know, I don’t know what to say. I just, it’s not.
But this was worth going into. I love you. Anyway,
Malcolm Collins: love you, Simone.
Speaker 13: He’s really good at alligators[00:46:00]
What do you think, buddy?
Thanks, friend
Speaker 11: Yeah, you know to push with your knuckles, right? Yeah. Why? So you don’t get your fingers dirty, because you eat with your fingers
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this episode of Based Camp, Simone and Malcolm Collins dive into the viral meme: “I’m just a normal person from 1995.” They explore how mainstream 1990s views — including those from Bill and Hillary Clinton on immigration, welfare reform, and borders — are now branded as “far-right extremism.”
Using data from Cremieux’s Substack analysis of the General Social Survey, Pew Research polarization graphs, and cultural shifts, they discuss the leftward drift on race, gender, sexuality, institutions, and more. They argue that what was once normal (family values, personal responsibility, evidence-based thinking) is now demonized, while the modern Right has become the side of data, science, realism, and genuine societal progress.
Topics include: the Overton window shift, trans issues and science, immigration realities, political tolerance, why many 1990s Democrats would be “MAGA” today, and the divorce between “progressivism” and actual improvement. Plus lighter moments on Hunter Biden, AI waifus, and mashed potatoes.
Show Notes
To set the scene, here are some quotes:
* From our xenophobic, far-right president, saying: “I want to talk with you about the problem of illegal immigration. It’s a problem our administration inherited, and it’s a very serious one. It costs the taxpayers of the United States a lot of money, and it’s unfair to Americans who are working every day to pay their own bills... Our immigration policy is focused in four areas: first, strengthening border control; second, protecting American jobs by enforcing laws against illegal immigrants at the workplace; third, deporting criminal and deportable aliens; fourth, giving assistance to States who need it and denying illegal aliens benefits for public services or welfare.”
* Or this from our capitalistic first lady, advocating for a “welfare reform plan that will dramatically change the nation’s welfare system into one that requires work in exchange for time-limited assistance.”
What do they all have in common? They come from left-leaning public figures in the 1990s.
* Bill Clinton
* Hillary Clinton
The Rabbit Hole on X posted “Far right is often just a propaganda term for normal person” alongside a cartoon of a woman and man in a car, with the woman saying: “Why are you so far right politically” and the man saying “I’m just a normal person from 1995.”
Andy Hatfield posted another meme that reads: “Recognize the warning signs of a far-right extremist:
* Full time employment
* Literacy
* Loves his family and country
* Common sense
* Obeys the law”
Inspired by the meme, Cremieux wrote A Normal Person 30 Years Ago A normal guy in 1995 probably believes a lot of things that are unacceptable now on Substack and his post about it—plus the resulting discourse—became a trending topic du jour on X.
Cremieux’s Observations
In his Substack article, Cremieux broke from the sentiment-based memes and looked at the data.
“I opened up the General Social Survey and had a look around. To get started, I defined a few sets of political views: Institutional Confidence, Criminal Justice & Guns, Political Tolerance, Economic/Pro-Government, Racial Liberalism/Civil Rights, Gender-Role Egalitarianism, and Sexual & Moral Liberalism, and then I outlined a set of important social views.”
The data shows that:
* “People have become less confident in America’s institutions over time.”
* “When it comes to criminal justice and firearms, more people think courts are too harsh on criminals, more people oppose the death penalty, and fewer people think we ought to requires permits to buy guns. The last of these didn’t change that much.”
* “Political tolerance has somewhat increased since the 1970s, but it’s somewhat down since the 1990s. This general trend masks something interesting: more acceptance of gays and atheists, less acceptance of racists and militarists.”
* “Movement on economically left-wing views has been generally pretty flat, which is roughly what we also see for economically right-wing views.”
* “When it comes to racial liberalism, people have shifted far to the left. People have become more likely to ascribe Black-White gaps to discrimination and less to a lack of effort, among other things.”
* “When it comes to gender roles, egalitarianism has greatly increased.”
* Diana Fleischman recently made an interesting observation on that front vis a vis male postpartum depression
* “Finally, when it comes to sexual and moral liberalism, views on sex education, divorce, marijuana legality, and so on have, in some cases, quite radically shifted towards left-ward positions. Abortion legality for serious defects is the only exception among the bunch.”
He concludes that “the nation has moved considerably, but not overwhelmingly, to the left.”
His editorialization is thoughtful: “What can we say about the normal person from 1995? In many ways, he was much like us. In other ways, he was what most people would now regard as kind of a dick. He didn’t like interracial marriage and he wasn’t too keen on gays either. These social views aren’t alone: plenty of things now considered taboo were, at the time, wholly acceptable, even in polite society, and sometimes these were the majority view.
Right or wrong, I don’t think appealing to normal people in the world 30 years ago is likely to make many friends after realizing the sorts of things people used to believe.”
I largely agree but also think he is not extrapolating sufficiently from the data. “Let a racist speak” has gone down in the General Social Survey, but also the definition of “racist” has changed significantly, from something that is, we would argue, blatantly racist, to someone who, for example, believes genes dictate skin color and other traits.
In short, I think he was looking at the wrong thing to measure change.
Additional Observations Shared on X
NC Phycicist observed that “Pew Research illustrates this nicely. What the left calls the “far right” is just the left moving further left.” sharing a pretty illustrative graph showing diverging median democrats and median republicans in 1994 vs 2017:
HF responded that: “Society always changes and moves on. By definition, a progressive (someone on the left) is either ahead of, or keeping up with those changes. A conservative (someone on the right) wants things to stay the same and not change.
Society always changes and moves on. By definition, a progressive (someone on the left) is either ahead of, or keeping up with those changes. A conservative (someone on the right) wants things to stay the same and not change.”
But Charles Pontificates pointed out that “It’s mostly leftists who want deindustrialization and the stagnation of energy production, and that’s hardly progress.” sharing a graph of electricity and income per capita that makes it clear there’s no such thing as a low-energy rich country.
People also tried to make slippery slope arguments:
* Rikki Schlott: “How far do we wanna go back on this one though? I’m just a normal guy from 1960? From 1850?”
* Posterior Malone: “Yeah it’s certainly true to some degree, but 30 years is a very long time…imagine saying in 1995: ‘I’m not far right, I’m just a normal person from 1965’”
* Martin Stepan: “I’m just a normal person from 1895.”
There’s some pondering to be done about progress and time fixing everything versus toxic ideologies spreading.
Episode Transcript
Simone Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Malcolm. I’m excited to be speaking with you today. I want to set the scene with some quotes. Let’s start with one from our xenophobic far-right president saying, “I wanna talk with you about the problem of illegal immigration.
It’s a problem our administration inherited and it’s a very serious one. It costs the taxpayers of the United States a lot of money, and it’s unfair to Americans who are working every day to pay their own bills. Our immigration policy is focused on four areas. First, strengthening border control. Second, protecting American jobs by enforcing laws against illegal immigrants at the workplace.
Third, deporting criminal and dep- deportable Americans. Fourth, giving assistance to the states who need it in denying illegal aliens benefits for the public services or welfare.” And then here’s, and just another one from our capitalistic first lady advocating for, “A welfare reform plan that will dramatically change the nation’s welfare system into one that [00:01:00] requires work in exchange for time-limited assistance.”
Oh, but crap. I used the wrong accents ‘cause, because I was actually quoting our different president and first lady from the 1990s, Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton. And that’s kind of the whole thing that’s been bubbling up on X recently. I think
Malcolm Collins: we saw this meme that’s like, “I’m just a normal- Yeah, the, the-
person from 1990” Yeah, the, the
Simone Collins: Rabbit Hole on X specifically posted this on X. Far right is just often a propaganda term for normal sent alongside a cartoon of a woman and man in a car with this woman saying, “Why are you so far right politically?” And the man saying, “I’m just a normal person from 1995.”
Speaker: We’re just normal men What do you mean normal men? We’re just innocent men. Eh?
Simone Collins: And Andy Hatfield also posted another meme under that that, that reads, “Recognize the warning signs of a far right extremist. Full-time employment, literacy, [00:02:00] loves his family and country, common sense, and obeys the law.” And,
Malcolm Collins: There, there was actually videos that were put together at one point.
Oh,
Simone Collins: really?
Malcolm Collins: I’m probably gonna be too lazy to look for them.
Speaker 3: Your son is not just lifting weights. He’s lifting the crushing weight of toxic masculinity. This is not fitness. It’s a silent scream for self-worth.
Malcolm Collins: But this became a thing where they were leftists- We’re creating warning signs if your son was being radicalized by the far right.
Simone Collins: Oh, are you serious? Like, that this is drifting off the thing? And it was stuff
Malcolm Collins: like... Yeah, it was stuff like, “Has he been working out more recently?
Has he started cleaning his room more?
Malcolm Collins: Has he-” Oh,
Simone Collins: no. No, no, no, no. No.
Malcolm Collins: I- I- yeah, no, actually it was like, “Has he started consuming less pornography? Has he started-”
Simone Collins: You’ve got to be kidding me ...
Malcolm Collins: Has he started playing less video games and working more? He might be being- No ... radicalized by the far right.” Oh, my God. Has he started... No, another thing that was cited was, like eating [00:03:00] healthy.
Like that was a, a warning sign. Like,
Simone Collins: I did... Oh.
Malcolm Collins: No, but the irony is, is that these are all actually pretty good warning signs-
Simone Collins: They are, they are legit good warning
Malcolm Collins: signs ... that a young man is being radicalized by the far right, right? You know. Oh, my God, Malcolm. He, he, they, if I, if I was a leftist and I saw my kid start exercising, I’d be like- No,
Simone Collins: then you know.
That’s how you know. It’s true. It’s, it’s actually true. That is, that is the funny part. Anyway though, Cremieux, who we love to follow think he’s a cool guy- just saw this post and decided to write a Substack article. He, in this, he broke from the sentiment-based memes around this subject and looked at the data.
Per his article, quote, “I opened up the general social survey and had a look around. To get started, I defined a few sets of political views: institutional confidence, criminal justice and guns, political tolerance, economic, pro-government, radical liberalism/civil rights, gender role egalitarianism, and sexual and moral liberalism,” and then I outlined a set of important soc- [00:04:00] social views.
I sent you, Malcolm, the graphs. I’m gonna put all the graphs and I’m gonna link to everything I’m talking about in the show notes for this on Patreon and Substack. But this is what he generally shows.
Malcolm Collins: I love Cremieux. He’s like a meme. A b- a friend of ours, by the way. I love him. You know, follow him on X.
A great, great right-wing tweeter. And he’s like, “Let’s break down the data. Let’s, let’s-” Yeah. Let’s look at
Simone Collins: it. But also, you know, his take is gonna be different from what I think a lot of people, even when you look at the discourse on X, ‘cause this ended up as one of sort of the trending topics that got surfaced as something on X, I think even just this morning as, as our time of recording.
What a lot of people assumed he was gonna be saying is not actually the conclusion that he reached after looking at the data, and I actually think he, he was missing important things in terms of the data he looked at. But anyway. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: oh, ooh.
Simone Collins: So the data shows that, and I’m just gonna quote his findings vis-a-vis all these things, but you, it’s better for you to look at the graphs, I think.
They, they really help to sort of hammer it home. And again, just go to Patreon and Substack. The data [00:05:00] shows that, quote, “People have become less comf-” Oh, my God, the screaming. quote, “
People have become less confident in America’s institutions over time. When it comes to criminal justice and firearms, people think courts are too harsh on criminals.
More people oppose the death penalty, and fewer people think they ought to require, Wait, and fewer people think we ought to require permits to buy guns. The last of these three didn’t change that much. Political tolerance has somewhat increased since the 1970s, but it’s somewhat down since the 1990s.
This general trend masks something interesting. More acceptance of gays and atheists, less acceptance of racists and militarists. Movement on economically left-wing views have been generally pretty flat, which is roughly what we see economically for right-wing views. And when it comes to racial liberalism, people have shifted far to the left.
People have become more likely to ascribe Black-white gaps to discrimination and less to a lack of effort, [00:06:00] among other things. And when it comes to gender roles, egalitarianism has greatly increased.” On this front, by the way our friend Diana Fleischman on X shared an interesting comment vis-a-vis this article that came out on, On postpartum depression for dads.
Specifically like a lot of people on X were like, “Oh, dads can’t have postpartum depression.” Like, that’s super screwed up, and like sort of gatekeeping around postpartum depression. And what she observed, and I think this is actually really astute, is that probably there’s a rise in postpartum depression specifically because while women have this sort of insane hormonal thing they go through-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah
Simone Collins: when babies are born, that, and I’ve, I’ve witnessed this, like actually makes them pretty tolerant of all the sleep deprivation and not super stressed about getting... ‘Cause I was super phobic about waking up in the middle of the night, for example before I ever had a kid, and in my, in my un- unparented life.
And now it means nothing to me to like get up at 1:00 AM, 3:00 AM, [00:07:00] like whatever. I don’t care. Like, I’m really not stressed about it, and I’m sleeping a lot less now. But I’m, it super doesn’t bother me. And when I sleep, I sleep more deeply. Men don’t have the same kind of hormonal balance or shift. Yeah.
And yet, these days, especially in, in like sort of educated progressive families, men are expected to like get up and, and, and feed babies in the middle of the night the same amount, or like be there for their wives when their wives are up and breastfeeding. In many cases, obviously not in all, but when they take a gender egalitarian approach to newborn care, men who did not go through this hor- whole hormonal revolution, who, you know, have not experienced this bodily change that has given them the ability to be more flexible in these ways, and it’s well documented that women’s brains go through a lot of changes and their bodies too, obviously hormonally as well that probably allow for this to be tolerable.
And again, I’ve experienced it personally and I didn’t believe it could be possible. Is it any surprise that men are getting depressed when they’re like thrown into like this situation that they’re not [00:08:00] equipped to handle? So anyway, I thought that was interesting. And then he writes finally, when it comes to sexual and moral liberalism, views on sex education, divorce, marijuana legality and so on have in some cases quite radically shifted towards leftward positions.
Abortion legality for serious defects is the only exception among the bunch. So he clu- he concludes however-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah So hold on, hold on.
Simone Collins: He concludes, and this is what’s most interesting that, that the nation has moved considerably but not overwhelmingly to the left. His editorialization on the issue is what can we say about the normal person from 1995?
In many ways he was much like us. In other ways, he was what most people now regard as kind of a dick. He didn’t like interracial marriage and he wasn’t too keen on gays either. These social views aren’t alone. Plenty of things now considered taboo were, at the time, wholly acceptable even in polite society, and sometimes these were the majority view.
Right or wrong, I don’t think appealing to normal people in the world 30 years [00:09:00] ago is likely to make many friends after realizing the sorts of things people used to believe. So I somewhat agree with him, but I also think that he’s not extrapolating sufficiently from the data. So when you look at one of the graphs about like sort of racial views let a racist speak has gone down in the general social survey.
But also the definition of racist has changed significantly, and that’s not gonna get picked up in this survey. So like it changed- Right ... in the ‘90s from something that like we would genuinely even today argue is blatantly racist to-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ...
Simone Collins: like let a racist speak means let, let someone admit that like genetic differences might lead to a difference in skin tone as you personally, Malcolm, experienced when being interviewed by an MSNBC journalist last year.
Like that’s what- Yeah ... racism is now, and that’s not gonna get picked up by this general social survey. So what I think Krimuw is missing is that he doesn’t understand that you can’t look at the general social survey and take this data-focused approach to this [00:10:00] issue, though I love the premise, because the definition of the words have changed rendering the survey data inadmissible.
What I think was more compelling was what NC Physicist observed which is I think a much more compelling graph which I’ll also send you on X to look at, and I’m also gonna post in the show notes of course. So this Pew graph I think is a lot better at illustrating what has happened. What NC Physicist observed and wrote was, “What the left calls far right is just the left moving further left.”
Sharing a pretty illustrative graph showing a diverging median Democrats and median Republicans in 1994 to 2017. For those who are just listening, basically 1994, there’s a median Democrat and a median Republican basically-
Malcolm Collins: High degree of overlap ...
Simone Collins: shown.
Yeah, they’re very close. Like, the medians are like this.
And then when you go to 2017, the medians suddenly diverge significantly. They’re quite far apart. And the, the graph goes from looking like two mountains [00:11:00] almost next to each other to, like, two quite different mountains with a very significant valley in between the two of them. Mm-hmm. And I think that that’s, that’s more what has happened.
Malcolm Collins: Well, here’s what I’ve begun to notice. And I think that this ... When I talk to your average, like, older boomer progressive about most of my beliefs, they don’t see them as particularly extreme, right? They’re like, “Oh, those are really normal things to believe.” Until I get to something like, you know, my beliefs on trans people or something like that, and they’re like, “Well, you know, what, what, what about, like, their rights?”
And I’m like, “Well, what about the rights of, like, religious people or people who dis- disagree with this,” right? And they’re like, “Well, yeah, that’s not, like, an extremist position to take.” What they don’t realize is functionally this average person from 1995 is today in the eyes of the normal progressive an absolute radical, an absolute extremist.
And [00:12:00] I think what we on the right do not fully realize is how many people who vote Democrat would actually support us if you could just get through ... Like, as I pointed out, when the thing I was shocked about was only sorry, that 40% of Democrats think that gender transition is immoral, right?
Like, like, like, that is astonishing to me, right? Like, when, when you talk about those numbers there, right? It, the left ... And yet, and yet you could be fired from saying that from a mainstream job too, right? Like, that it’s one, both such an unpopular opinion among the masses, but two, that it’s seen as labeling you as an extremist, right?
And I think a lot of the conversation is about waking people up to this reality, right? You know, that-
That th- that everyone who is really still sane is on the [00:13:00] right at this point. There, there is not... Like, the, the leftist factions that, that control what’s left of, of the left, when they go out there at their protest and say, “Shoot a Nazi,” and then, and this is a frequent mainstream talking point on the left- No,
Simone Collins: the, the, it’s punch, punch a Nazi.
But yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Punch a Nazi. Assault a Nazi. Okay, great. This is a normal mainstream talking point on the left. It’s also a normal mainstream t- talking point that if you sit at a table with a Nazi, you’re also a Nazi. And it’s also a mainstream talking point that MAGA is Nazi, which by the way, over half of America’s voted for.
They, it is... W- when you take these together and you ask, why are there so many leftist mass shootings these days it, it becomes immediately obvious. It is normal for them to believe they have a license to kill the vast majority of Americans for different belief systems. And the moment you wake up a leftist often, often, like one of these sort of sleeping boomer leftists, this is what their party is [00:14:00] now.
I, I think a lot of them are like, “Oh, I guess I, I guess I’m MAGA.” But then they’re like, “But if anyone ever found that out, I’d, I’d lose my job, I’d lose my friends, I’d lose my...” ‘Cause that’s the way that the left operates at this point, right?
Simone Collins: Well, one thing I thought was also interesting from this discourse and some of the, the discussion that people had, is this tension between the idea of progress and people shifting cultural views in the face of just better evidence, like learning, getting better, just the idea of progressivism being a concept of society progressing and improving.
And, and, well, this tension of that with like, to- I wanna say toxic culture and messages that actually isn’t making society better. So, HF responded in this general, like, about this subject, “Society always changes and moves on. By definition, a progressive, someone on the left, is either ahead of or keeping up with those changes.
A conservative, someone on the right, wants things to stay the same and not change. Society always changes [00:15:00] and moves on. By definition, a progressive, someone on the left, is either ahead of keeping up with those changes. A conservative, someone on the right, wants things to stay the same and not change.” But Charles Pontificates pointed out that, quote, “It’s mostly leftists who want deindustrialization and the stagnation of energy production, and that’s hardly progress.”
And he shared a graph of electricity and income per capita that makes it super clear that there’s no such thing as a low energy rich country. And where I felt like there’s this tension is I mean, a lot of people are trying to argue in response to this whole like, “Oh, well, they’re just reasonable people.”
Malcolm Collins: Well, I, I think that that’s just fundamentally not what the left-right divide is anymore. Uh-huh. And I think that saying that conservatives... If you go to a conservative and you ask them, like let’s say the trans stuff. My opinion on transition was changed predominantly by changes in the scientific evidence.
Simone Collins: Oh, okay. That’s a really- like- Yeah, that’s a good example of like where the left isn’t progressing with modern science and [00:16:00] understanding. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Right. Yeah, like with modern science it looks like the left should be- Or like
Simone Collins: climate change, right? Like, we learn different things about cli- But- And population is a good one, right?
Climate change, population. There was a belief
Malcolm Collins: that
Simone Collins: there were gonna be too many people, and now we know that we’re okay with a higher level of population. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: The right now is the side of data and statistics- Mm ... and, and c- climate realism and genetical re- realism, right? Like, we are the side that is engaging with information, and the left has just stopped doing that.
Simone Collins: Right. It- So this argument that it’s just that the left is the, is the, is the party of data and reality, and the right is, and conservatives are... I guess, and that’s maybe why we don’t call the it, the new conservatives. We call it the new right because-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, because it’s not small C conservatives.
Simone Collins: Uh-huh. There are often- It’s not just go back to the old ways
y-
Malcolm Collins: quite radical people who are often open to a large diversity of ways of potentially fixing things.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And-
Simone Collins: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: the reason why it’s not just like go back to the old ways or don’t change is there isn’t just [00:17:00] like one unified image of the past that we’re fighting for anymore. It’s a better future that we’re fighting for.
And, and that obviously involves a lot of things. Like right now the right is a pro-AI party. The left is the anti-AI party. The right is the pro-nuclear party. The left is the anti-nuclear party. The right is the pro-genetics party. The left is the anti-genetics party. On almost every meaningful scientific i- issue
The, the right is the people coming to the, to the table with statistics. And when I talk about, like, with the trans stuff, it’s like, you know, if you follow the WPATH leaks or the data that the Travis Stark Clinic was hiding that you know, putting people on puberty blockers was increasing their unaliving risk, and now that it’s been banned in the UK, we haven’t seen any increase in unalivings in the UK, even within the trans community.
We now know that, like, the, the, those things are not true. And so now that we have that information, we can say, “Oh, we were wrong,” right? Like, the data that we were looking at was coming out of clinics that were making the majority of their money off of gender transition, which we’ve seen all of the pro-trans studies were.
[00:18:00] They had somebody involved whose life depended, life, livelihood depended on this being normalized, and that those institutions were covering up the data that was showing this wasn’t working. And we have historic evidence where a real... This happened in the past too, with Joe Money, right? Like, this is a repeated phenomenon, and when the phenomenon comes to light, you update your opinions, right?
We have changed our opinion significantly on a, you know, immigration because now if we look at the numbers, even three generations in,
Hispanic immigrants are over 50% on welfare, right? You know, you can’t support that, right? That eventually that ends up breaking the, the welfare system. They do not assimilate, right?
And with that being the case, and it’s, and it’s funny because, like, the leftists will even say, “Well, the goal isn’t assimilation.” If the goal isn’t assimilation, like, if you see that as a bad thing, them losing their heritage or, you know, culture, then we will become like the countries that they’re coming from, right?
Like, the, presumably the reason we don’t is it’s not that we have magic soil or something, it’s that [00:19:00] we see and perceive reality and ethics differently, and when they come to this perception, then they become productive like us, even if you are a blank slates. If you’re throwing that out the window, then we’re...
What, what conversation are we even having here?
Simone Collins: Yeah, this is really helpful for me because I, like I grew up just loving like the West Wing Democrat. Like this like we are patriotic, we love our country, we, we want everyone to thrive, we believe in science. That, that, like that’s the Democrat to which I anchored,
Malcolm Collins: And that’s what the right is now.
Simone Collins: I know. And, but like, but then I think there’s still a lot of people who remain Democrats today who still think that they’re West Wing Democrats, but they don’t... They hate America- ... and they won’t listen to science. And I’m, I, gets so confusing to me sometimes because we’re, I think we’re often confused of, or, or we’re, we’re being accused of being so something that we’re not.
When I think I’m, I’m certainly not the only person who is now on the right who [00:20:00] like grew up obsessed with West Wing Democrats because they’re wonderful. I love that show.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean-
Simone Collins: So that’s helpful. But, because I mean, what people kept saying is like, “Oh yeah? Yeah? Like well I’m just a normal person from the 1830s.”
Like do, is that where you, is that what you want? Is that what you want? Like you want Jim Crow? Is that what you want? And like, y- it, it just didn’t sit right with me.
Malcolm Collins: But this helps- Well, the reason why- ... sort of reframe it
Simone Collins: for me ...
Malcolm Collins: people say, “I’m just a normal person from 1995,” and it hits so hard for people in a way that
Simone Collins: these- 1995.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. When these people say, “Oh, I’m from the 1930s,” or whatever, is pretty much everyone agrees society, or at least America and Western countries, were demonstrably better in 1995, right? Like things were working better. There was less actual racism in our society, there was less you know, of the conflicts that we’re dealing with now as a society.
So when a person presents to you, “I am an average person from 1995,” m- people who hear that, the reason it’s effective is they’re like, “Yeah, let’s [00:21:00] go back to something that worked,” because this, what y- what we’re doing now, the left isn’t working.
Simone Collins: That Disney pastime is yeah. I, I really just need to wear my bonnet more. He’s going for it. But yeah, I that, th- this has been really helpful for me then because it’s, it’s helping me actually come to terms with this cognitive dissonance I’ve had around like the right being framed so readily as anti-progress, and even Cremieux being like- Yeah, the
Malcolm Collins: Cremieux-
Simone Collins: “Oh, the left hasn’t really changed” ... he’s a
Malcolm Collins: right-wing scientist. What’s he doing?
Simone Collins: Well, so this was a timed post, so I think maybe he was like, “I don’t know. Let’s see if the data backs it up.” And per the data he chose for this particular thing,
Malcolm Collins: Oh, he does that stupid timed writing
Simone Collins: thing ... that US general survey.
Yeah, I mean, like, ‘cause when that other person on X looked up the Pew results, like it’s very clear that there’s been a change. I think a lot of this comes down to definitions, but I think in that also is something interesting in that like it’s not necessarily that, [00:22:00] like, people’s reported views haven’t actually changed that much, and I think that’s meaningful.
It’s more that like maybe, maybe the radicalization is, is in definitions, is in like the way that people... The, the way that people have been radicalized, like the, the, the lobster or frog being boiled phenomenon had more to do with like not, not radicalizing people, but fundamentally and subtly changing definitions of like let’s just redefine you know, mental health as this, of of harm as no longer like physical assault, but of, you know, triggering someone, making someone feel bad.
You know, let’s, let’s r- reframe body positivity as not like, “Hey, you know, you don’t have to be perfect,” to like, “Oh, it’s okay to be morbidly obese and like deeply unhealthy.” Like maybe that’s where the, the societal harm or like the radicalization has taken place, and of course in certain measurement [00:23:00] formats that’s just not gonna show up.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I just think his entire framing is wrong about what, what, what conservatism is in a, in a modern context, like what the right is in a modern context. Because it’s, it’s, it’s not just like, wrong. It’s an inversion of reality.
Simone Collins: I think you’re right. Yeah, it, it’s still interesting. And I, I mean, I keep hearing that whole, like, 1995 Democrat thing bandied about. It is so striking to see these quotes from Bill Clinton that are like, “Hey,” like, “Let’s, let’s control our borders and, you know, curtail social services for, you know, immigrants in our, in our cities.”
And, and that being, like, just the same simple stance that our current president has, and yet such a different view of how they’re categorized even today. It’s, it’s wild.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, I think the left back in the day was having a conversation where [00:24:00] the left and right had different values, right? But they both still wanted the best interest of the country, right?
And its people. And I think that now, very openly, the left is antagonistic towards the count- whatever country it’s in and its people. And this is, this is a fund- That means the conversation’s fundamentally different. They’re asking, “How can I destroy you?” We’re asking, “How can we build you up?”
Simone Collins: Yeah, maybe it’s connected to that, that sort of communist or, like, socialist Americans association plan that you de- outlined in a separate episode where they were like, “Okay, we’re gonna, you know, get people to collectively think that they’re super mentally unwell.”
You know, foment a- a- encourage the development of hideous art. Like, all these things. Maybe that’s kind of also it’s what’s happened is this collective plan since at least the ‘70s to basically make Americans hate America and be miserable, has also seeped in and taken over in a way that has been incredibly damaging.[00:25:00]
But I don’t know. You know- That’s, that’s more, what more or less what I wanted to discuss. This is, this is a short one, but,
Malcolm Collins: It’s a short one. Well, I mean, I think the thing that we need to get away from is the perception that we are... because in a way, yes, it is that we are 1995 Democrats, and that we are fighting with a collection of widely diverse people against the culturally dominant force, which at that time was the Judeo-Christian community.
And now it’s the urban monoculture. But I, I think outside of that, n- n- the, the two things don’t share that much in common. Like, the wider political ideology of, like, staffing the White House with a bunch of entrepreneurs and like, like, Founders Fund people and you know, actually cleaning things up, and I guess it’s...
But, like, everybody always kind of wanted the government to be and be doing who wanted a better future.
Simone Collins: But is it- I think actually Clinton had a, an effort similar [00:26:00] to DOGE.
Malcolm Collins: Oh yeah, he did. It
Simone Collins: was executed quite differently, but again, like, the similarities are insane. Plus, Trump at that very same time was a Democrat and openly known for being, like, a liberal Democrat public media figure.
So, like, I, I don’t know. I don’t know. I,
Malcolm Collins: I, by the way, fun, fun aside here, People have been talking about, and I, and I think that they’re right about this, about what was his name? Who, who’s the last president? Joe Bi- Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden running for office in a few years.
Simone Collins: Like- Oh, he’s on his comeback tour.
Yeah, I mean, I think the odds are long
Malcolm Collins: for anyone- He’s on his comeback tour. You know what? He could, he could I think do pretty well in terms of bipartisan support.
Simone Collins: Another glass ceiling. Yeah, you know?
Malcolm Collins: I mean, he’s a crazy crackhead, but he, he does it so he really captures the, what... Like, Gavin Newsom tried to do the Trump irreverent thing- Mm-hmm
and it didn’t work at all. Like, it looked so fake. When you know, Hunter Biden on, like, the Democrats’ main website has one [00:27:00] of his photos
with a crack pipe in his mouth- ... like, that is f*****g hilarious. That’s like, I’m not a Democrat, and I’m like, “That is hilarious that on the list of, like, who’s supporting who, you’ve got a, Hunter Biden with a crack pipe.”
Speaker 5: Here’s Hunter Biden reacting to this image. “ I know it may sound petty, but I can’t stand it when people Photoshop a meth pipe in my mouth. A crack pipe doesn’t have that little bowl at the end. This is why you can’t trust AI. Please make the appropriate edit. Thank you for your attention to the matter.”
Simone Collins: Well, in an age in which we’re just so fed up with inauthenticity, I think it’s one of the reasons why Trump did so well, is, like, Trump is exactly who- ... you think he is. He does not hide or try to obscure anything. Yeah. I mean, like, what- He’s proud of who he is, hides nothing. Hunter Biden is like, “Yeah, I did this.”
Like, it, it, like, the stories he told when he interviewed with Candace Owens were insane. And- Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Well, people are like, “Why, why aren’t you in, why aren’t you in jail?” And he’s like, “Well, my dad got me pardoned.”
Simone Collins: Yeah. Duh. Like-
Malcolm Collins: Like, what, what-
Simone Collins: Yeah, it, it’s super... And, and that’s, that’s, [00:28:00] that’s all we needed to hear.
You know, that just he’s not trying to virtue signal. He’s like, “Yep, that’s what happened.” Yeah, and then- And like, look at all this other crazy stuff. And I think especially, you know, in, with all the blowback that, that is arising in the face of, like, the Epstein revelations not being what we expected and all these things just not playing out the way we expected he’s got a lot going for him.
So yeah, if I- They should, yeah, they should just run him 20... I mean, it would be a tough run. Honestly- Yeah, running would be a tough run ... if it were Hunter Biden versus any of the... I mean, certainly, like Marco Rubio, there’s no way. There’s no way.
Malcolm Collins: Marco Rubio would struggle against Hunter Biden.
Simone Collins: Yeah, because Marco Rubio is all polished and perfect, and he looks like he’s hiding something.
He represents establishment. Yeah, I don’t, I don’t
Malcolm Collins: say, I don’t think Marco Rubio is a good candidate to run at all. Like, he comes across as very- I
Simone Collins: know, but people keep talking about him. I’m just
Malcolm Collins: saying ... people keep talking about him, but he just doesn’t, he comes off as so inauthentic c- compared- Yeah ... to, like, JD Vance.
Simone Collins: Right. But not everyone... Look, there are still many people who [00:29:00] weirdly want the inauthentic. They’re like, “Just give me my inauthentic politician and they have the authentic.” No,
Malcolm Collins: I just get that they have the opinion of Marco Rubio based on the things that he’s done in the administration, which I appreciate.
Simone Collins: Mm.
Malcolm Collins: And they have the opinion of JD Vance based on his history. I used to hate JD Vance for his whole Hillbilly Elegy and all that, and all his NPR-
Simone Collins: You didn’t even read it.
Malcolm Collins: No, but I saw his NPR apology tour. It was gross.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: okay. But when I listen to his speeches now and I see him talking now, and I know, “Oh, this is a guy who watches Asmongold.
This is a guy who knows Hasan Shocks his dog. This is a guy who is eviscerating the UK for, like, what’s happening there in angry social media posts.” And the UK’s are like, “We, how dare you say that the UK is a garbage country and, like, the people should revolt.” But, like, I don’t see that from Marco Rubio.
I’ve never seen a speech where, like, afterwards I was like, I wanted to cheer for him, or I felt, like, a connection with him. Mm. But, you know, that, that, that’s- We shall
Simone Collins: see. We shall see. But no, you’ve... Th- this has been an important conversation for us because at least [00:30:00] now I understand That there’s been a divorce between, from the concept of progressivism and actual societal progress, which requires a reconciliation with inconvenient scientific truths and, and just, like, realities.
Plus just a- adapting with science. A- and adopting science, to your point. AI shifts in our understanding of how to best contend with climate change just realities of, of genetic differences realities of gender transition not being what we thought it was. Yeah, all these things are a divorce from what the natural, like, progress of history is going to be.
Malcolm Collins: It turned out that, like, sleeping with whoever you want whenever you want doesn’t lead to positive outcomes,
Simone Collins: right?
Malcolm Collins: You
Simone Collins: know? Right. Right, right. And I actually think, like, yeah, truly a true progressive has to, by definition, change their mind because we are going to try new things as society evolves, and some of those things we’re gonna try out to not be so good.
Like, they’re gonna turn out to be kinda damaging. And it’s like, okay, well look, we tried that. It, [00:31:00] that, that is, like, the scientific method, right? You, like, hypothesis, and then you do an experiment, and then you see if your hypothesis is null or if, if the... You’re like, “Oh, okay, I was right. I was wrong.” Like, okay, now we need to adapt.
We need further research. And then you, you, you, you, you refine, you iterate. And a true progressive society must be iterative, and the left has become a lot less iterative. Whereas on the right what you actually see is what feels like a modern version of a much more broad and distributed academic framework of, like, different schools of thought actively competing and seeing how their experiments turn out.
It’s super cool. It’s like a bunch of people, like, all trying to cure cancer and being like, “Well, I’m gonna try this weird form of gene therapy.” “Well, I’m gonna try this weird mushroom derivative.” And, “I’m gonna try, like, this targeted, like, weird bacteria.” And, like, all these different groups are trying and seeing what works best, and then when a group discovers that, like, “Oh, my weird mushroom solution actually causes the cancer to grow significantly more,” guess what?
[00:32:00] They drop it. And then on the other hand, we have, like, this one group that’s like, “I only do this one therapy. This one therapy is perfect.” And then it turns out the therapy’s, like, totally killing people. But who cares? No, we only do this one therapy, and how dare you suggest anything else? Anyway, I’m going to go.
Assuming it would be good for you, ‘cause I know you’re not feeling really great, I was gonna make heavy, creamy, smooth mashed potatoes, but I need to go now.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, that would be great for today, yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Okay, well then...
Malcolm Collins: Just mashed potatoes.
Simone Collins: Just mashed potatoes. I’m okay with that because the amount of cream and butter in them is, like, a little bit of protein plus a lot of, of fats, so I’m like, okay, fine.
I
Malcolm Collins: don’t eat that much. You know that, Simone,
Simone Collins: right? I know. But especially on days where you’re not feeling so well, I feel like creamy mashed potatoes. Like, I w- I want... I’m envisioning, it’s not gonna turn out this way, but I’m envisioning the kind that you get on the instant mashed potatoes- box where it looks like a snowy mountain at sunrise with a pat of butter slowly sliding down a beautifully whipped- I think with
Malcolm Collins: AI you’re gonna be able to make [00:33:00] great mashed potatoes.
Simone Collins: I, I pulled up a, a recipe and I... it looks good, so... with AI, of course.
Malcolm Collins: Remember to use rfab.ai recipe generator or-
Simone Collins: Yeah, it even creates really... Like, the images are also great motivation, ‘cause it shows you what you can get. And, and, like, pretty good, ‘cause you’re using Nana Banana for the images, and Nana Banana is, is the accurate AI image generator, whereas Grok is, like, the sexy, fun AI image generator.
So I like it.
Speaker 6: Or as a crazier feature, , and this one just came out, so it’s gonna be undergoing lots of updates. It’s got some stability issues now, but it’s a feature that allows you to search every not safe for work site that doesn’t have real humans on it, because I think that’s immoral, , at once. , So all of the, , not safe for work drawing sites can be searched simultaneously, and not just searched simultaneously, but from them you can, , download entire galleries with just a click, , without having to go through each individually with some, , useful [00:34:00] time-saving buttons like the no homo button, which just immediately removes all of the gay or male related tags from the search.
Or the, , English button, which instead of just searching for English, it searches for other languages, so you also get things without any, , language attached to them
Simone Collins: Yeah. Anyway.
Malcolm Collins: I love you.
Simone Collins: Off to potato land I go. God
Malcolm Collins: willing. Off to potato land I go soon enough.
Simone Collins: Hopefully. Yeah. We’ll see.
Malcolm Collins: All right. Bye.
Simone Collins: Bye. lap. He’s, he does this thing where he likes
Malcolm Collins: to- Okay. Roseanne
Simone Collins: Yes.
Malcolm Collins: We gotta make the AI waifu a, a thing. I think, I, I really wanna go harder with this. Like, the idea- Oh my God ... of, I, I, I wanna make it, like, even a meme on the right. I, I think it would be fun of you know, y- you, you can still... Being on the right doesn’t mean you can’t be, like, when I make sexy pictures of my AI waifu, which is just my wife done in, like, a Puritan AI anime style,
Simone Collins: You mean when you make AI pictures of [00:35:00] your wife waifu- Ah
not your actual
Malcolm Collins: fake wife. Yeah, yeah. Like, I do not understand, like, the people have gotten... It’s my wife, okay? Like, this is my property, okay? There is n- And it’s not like she’s semi-closed in these or something. It’s not like she’s you know, showing off some sort of sexualized asset like breasts or something.
You know, it’s literally my wife drawn in a way that is appealing enough to you, the watcher, you know, with, with yandere face or whatever, where you’re like, “Oh that, that, that’s, that’s We’re have- like, we need to be the side of fun, not the side of curmudgeonliness, okay? And I wanna put m- m- more pictures of myself.
I, I did some Duke of the North ones of, of me.
Simone Collins: Yeah, I wanna see those. Give me more of those.
Malcolm Collins: More of Otherworld Malcolm. More,
Simone Collins: more Malcolm fan art. That’s what I’m here for. Well,
Malcolm Collins: they had the, the fur on them, and I w- we were thinking about that
Simone Collins: before. Yeah, and I keep sending you those outfits, [00:36:00] and you just never wanna choose them.
You- Let’s
Malcolm Collins: get one. Let’s get one. I’ma b- make a note right now. No, you can’t. I will stay up late to find fur.
Simone Collins: No. D- you are going to bed tonight. You’re going to bed early, or you might discover that key electronics in your room have just started to disappear randomly.
Malcolm Collins: This is the way you treat our kids.
Simone Collins: It’s true, actually.
Malcolm Collins: But I mean, I mean, I wanna make it, like, a... I want it to be not just us, but I, like, want the wider community to... Because I think, you know, we did this with Emilia to an extent, right? But the problem with Emilia is if you’re an older woman, like, let’s say 40 or something like that, and you’re dressing like Emilia, or 35, 36, and you’re dressing like Emilia you’re gonna look like a creep or a, a loser, right?
Like, that, that looks try-hard and empathetic. Yeah,
Simone Collins: it’s so tried, yeah. Women need to dress their age. Let’s bring it back, people.
Malcolm Collins: We need to show that being a Christian mom is not uncool or unsexy. And, like, if [00:37:00] you were Jewish- you- Y- you could draw,
Simone Collins: like- They don’t have to be sexy. Let’s be clear. They can just be cool.
No,
Malcolm Collins: but th- women want to be desirable, and we do not have an archetype of a desirable woman with, like, five or six kids who tries to live a moral life. But there’s no reason we... We can fight asymmetrical warfare with the left because we can have sexy women and anime, right? So let’s buckle in and start fighting this.
You know, if y- if you’re Jewish, you can do, like, hot Hasidic women, right? You know, you can do the, the hot Hasidic family. Oh. The, you know, if, if you’re- And if you’re Christian, you know, post, post the, the, the, your, your wife. And I think that making it of, you know- Your wife ... your wife or, or your ideal wife if you don’t have a wife is, is also a fun way because you know it’s going to trigger the leftists soaking hard.
When they see- Yeah. Let’s do this ... us having fun, that’s gonna trigger them. Don’t let it trigger you, okay? We gotta, we gotta win this.
Simone Collins: All right. [00:38:00] Okay. As long as I get more Malcolm fan art, I’m down with it.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins: I like, I like the Malcolm fan art you create for me. I mean, obviously I should be creating it too, I just don’t...
There’s no time for fun. There’s no time for anything. Gotta... Anyway, shall I start?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, let’s get started.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Are the apples wet? They, they have a lot. All apples
No, no, apples are just naturally a bit wet, Toasty. Washed them in the sink to wash off the dust- Come on, Toasty ... that you’re always so worried about, right?
Torsten, eat an apple. What are you doing?
She didn’t lick them all
I want it back to zoo. It’s true I know it’s true. I, I promise you she- Jackson, you were-[00:39:00]
See, Tyne didn’t. That would be a really long thing for her to do, Josie You make her too much fun. We went in the-
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this episode of Bricks and Minifigs 2, Malcolm and Simone Collins break down the Coffeezilla investigation into the Bricks & Minifigs Lego controversy. They explain what Coffeezilla allegedly got wrong—especially around accounts payable, business acquisitions, liabilities, and ownership of consignment inventory.
Malcolm and Simone (experienced business buyers/sellers) dive into why the previous owner wasn’t being shady, how stock purchases transfer liabilities, why the “missing Legos” narrative misses the bigger picture, and the legal realities of taking over a business with existing obligations. They also discuss the broader saga, corporate responses, Brian Mansell’s history with the company, and why the focus should now be on properly resolving things with investigator Ben.
A must-watch for anyone following the Bricks & Minifigs drama, Lego collectors, business ethics enthusiasts, or fans of deep-dive investigations. What do you think—did Coffeezilla miss key business 101 details?
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] you had watched the Coffeezilla piece and were convinced by it on Bricks and Minifigs. And- I mean- Oh my God, I thought that you with your business background would immediately see what he was getting wrong.
Simone Collins: What was he getting wrong?
Malcolm Collins: So there were two big things he got wrong. Okay. The, the really big glaring one is when he said the previous owner sold some of the sets without sending the money to the guy, right?
And yet we see from her own words when they’re doing the transition of ownership, she goes, “You’re going to-” Yeah,
Simone Collins: I’m worried about... Yeah. “
Malcolm Collins: You’re
Simone Collins: gonna close out-” And they, they’re like, “We’re gonna have some- That’s gonna get handled by someone else.”
Malcolm Collins: That’s what I heard. No, no, no. But she wasn’t worried about the inventory.
Mm-hmm. She, she was worried more about closing out the accounts.
Speaker 2: These are ones that haven’t-- he has not been paid his percentage yet, and if I don’t have the tickets, I won’t know how much I need to pay him. That, that’s a business thing and not necessarily yours. If, if taking on the business, he takes on all that comes on that [00:01:00] part.
Speaker 3: What’s extremely funny about this piece in retrospect is you can see that the person, if not the CEO, at least somebody at Bricks & Minifigs properly understood the law that when you buy a business, you take on accounts payable
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. What that means in business speak is she knew part of the money that was meant to go to him had been unpaid. Oh. And she’s like, “I need to go over my notes.” She even specifically says, “I need to go over my notes to see those amounts.” And then they say, “No, we’ll take on that responsibility.”
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: This is a normal thing in business. Yeah. This isn’t her being shady. It’s not like-
Simone Collins: Well, that’s... When you acquire a company if it is not- an asset acquisition. If it’s a stock acquisition, you also acquire their liabilities
Malcolm Collins: Liabilities.
Simone Collins: And that, one of the liabilities- You acquire their liabilities
is your accounts payable, and that is accounts payable. Yeah. Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: that’s, that’s accounts... Th- this is the most 101 thing in business, and you were like, “Oh, there weren’t that many Legos in the store because she had sold some before,” and it’s like, n- that doesn’t, that doesn’t matter. And then the second thing- No,
Simone Collins: what, what Coffeezilla said is that, that I [00:02:00] thought was most notable was that the amount that’s sort of pending was much smaller than people thought.
It’s more, like, in the $20,000 range. That’s
Malcolm Collins: because he wasn’t inc- including the accounts payable in the amount pending.
Simone Collins: I thought that’s what the amount was, that the accounts payable- No ... oh.
Malcolm Collins: He was talking about the physical sets that were still in the store, because he didn’t seem to understand accounts payable.
Simone Collins: Hmm, I... Th- that can’t be. That’s too obvious.
Malcolm Collins: No, it’s obvious to you because you’re a business person. He very clearly, if you watch the piece, and he was calculating the amount of money that he said Bricks and Minifigs owed the , the guy, he just did an addition of all of the sets he could find in their inventory.
He didn’t- Oh ... include accounts payable, which would have, from what we’re hearing, maybe doubled that amount. So that was the first thing that really annoyed me.
Simone Collins: I just figured if that was the case, then they would have included, featured prominently in that particular investigative episode, Coffeezilla, I mean.
Like, i- she would say, “And the accounts payable amount was, like, $34,000.” She
Malcolm Collins: [00:03:00] literally says that. She goes, “I need to check my records so I can settle accounts with the people who have order-”
Simone Collins: Yeah, in, in... I know, from the recorded clip, but she doesn’t say how much that was. In the, in the subsequent interview that she had- Why?
In
Malcolm Collins: the subsequent... Because she’s being an idiot ...
Simone Collins: with Coffeezilla, she would have stated that amount. ‘
Malcolm Collins: Cause she’s being an idiot. But in the, i- when she’s having the store taken over, she literally says, “I need to settle the accounts,” implying there’s a large amount of accounts payable specifically to him.
Because, the,
Simone Collins: Then why has no one stated that amount?
Malcolm Collins: When we did our first episode, people were like, “Malcolm, it’s crazy that you saw things in this case that I just didn’t understand.” I think a lot of people are just ‘tards, Simone. That’s, that’s the, the- Well,
Simone Collins: no, but I mean, it, it, at the very le- oh, I guess the Brian, the original owner would not know the amounts because he wouldn’t have been aware, aware of what was sold and not.
Do you
Malcolm Collins: think Ben or Brian understands what accounts payable is? The, the, these-
Simone Collins: Yes, I, I imagine they do. But I also imagine they couldn’t know. Like, ‘cause i- if I’ve, if I’ve given something to a shop for consignment, I don’t know at any given day what [00:04:00] has sold and what hasn’t. Yeah. Like, there’s not... That’s just for us to know.
Malcolm Collins: Yes, which is why she said, “I need to check my records.” Okay. So that really annoyed me.
Speaker 4: Just so you understand why the law works this way, imagine if the law didn’t work this way and accounts payable magically disappeared or was transferred to the old owner of a business, , whenever the business changed hands. Now keep in mind, the owner of a business can be a business, , or not a specific individual.
So suppose, , one individual, , , , accrues a large amount of accounts payable in a business, , and they just then transfer that business to themselves for like a one dollar sale, right? , And they say, “Oh, all the money that I owed people with this business...” , N-no, or let’s not say themselves. Let’s say their brother.
, They say, “All the money this business owed immediately disappears because it transferred hands.” , That would be completely stupid. , Th- that would be like the easiest business trickeroo in the world. Like, it’s very obvious why n- you cannot have the law work this way
Malcolm Collins: And then the second thing that really annoyed me- ... that we can go further on-
Simone Collins: Oh,
Malcolm Collins: [00:05:00] God. Crap ... is they keep focusing on whether or not she, she had the right to enter into the consignment deal, which is just totally irrelevant to any of the facts of the case.
Whether or not she had that... So think of it this way, Simone. Uh-huh. Suppose I own a garage right? Or let, let’s, let’s make this different. I’m leasing a garage from somebody else, okay? To make this even clearer. And then I use the garage I’m leasing in violation of the terms of my lease to do what, what do you what do you call that where you, like, pay somebody to s- park your car for you at, like, restaurants?
Well, I d- I don’t know the term. You pay somebody at a restaurant to park your-
Simone Collins: Valet ...
Malcolm Collins: valet. Okay, yes. So I use it for valet storage in violation of the agreement, right?
Simone Collins: Oh.
Malcolm Collins: Then the owner comes back and they go, “You didn’t have the right to run valet service here.” So then what they do is they take possession of...
Because I’m only subleasing the asset, right? They [00:06:00] retake possession of the garage, and then they turn around and start selling all of the cars that I had been- Yeah,
Simone Collins: like you parked a Ferrari and they’re like, “So this is mine now.”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, they’re like, “This is m-”. That is not remotely how the law works.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: You don’t take possession of an asset- Mm
, Just because it’s in a location that you took possession of.
Speaker 5: Again, to understand why it would be comical for the law to work this way, suppose I owned a, , storage locker that I rented to someone, and then the moment they moved in all their stuff, I then went to, , my brother, and I sold the storage locker to my brother. And then he now said, “Now I own everything in the storage locker.”
Or I own a, a hotel, and I wait until a bunch of really rich people come there for a trip, and then I sell it to somebody, and, , now they own everything. All you would need to do to ste- legally steal stuff from somebody is to own something where you expected something of high value to go across, and then [00:07:00] immediately sell it to somebody who you’re close with the moment the person with high value walks across a w- five-foot square of land that you own
Simone Collins: Yeah, I wonder how the law works with that. Like, if someone puts stolen goods or, like, someone else’s goods
Malcolm Collins: in your home. No, it’s, it’s, no, it’s not how the law... It’s the clear... Okay, so m- suppose I walk into a building and I set a, a, a diamond ring I own on a table in the building.
Yeah. And then that building sells. The person who buys the building doesn’t own my diamond ring. There’s
Simone Collins: no finders keepers law?
Malcolm Collins: Y- that’s not remotely how it works. That wasn’t included in the assets of the purchase. It wasn’t neg- And this is all laid out when you make a purchase of a company.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But yeah, sorry, that really gets me as well, but it continues.
Simone Collins: How does US law work with ownership of lost items? For example, if I lose a diamond ring at a restaurant and someone picks it up Are they legally in trouble for not giving it back to me if I [00:08:00] return to the restaurant and say, “It was mine”? What does that
Malcolm Collins: have to do with anything?
Simone Collins: I’m just curious about it.
‘Cause now I’m just curious about finders keepers law. It’s not a law. It’s not a law. I’m just wondering like-
Malcolm Collins: This is the... I mean, it’s clearly how the Bricks & Minifigs guy think the law works
The, the, the principle of finders keepers
Simone Collins: So b- basically property is yours unless you abandon it. A finder- Yeah ... generally has a right to possess an item that is good against everyone except the true owner. Okay, so there is kind of a finders keepers. But they have to give it back to the true owner if the owner can prove owners- so there kind of is a s- a finders keepers law.
Malcolm Collins: No, if the owner can prove ownership. Mm-hmm. Which the original contract proves that the person that they
Simone Collins: took the property from- Yes. No, 100%, yeah. W- yeah, with, with bricks and minifigs, of course. That’s, that’s obvious ...
Malcolm Collins: didn’t have ownership
Simone Collins: Yeah, and then it’s a civil issue if you refuse to give it back. Interesting Mm. Many systems distinguish lost from [00:09:00] mislaid, AKA, like, deliberately set down or forgotten. Property left on the premises is often treated as mislaid. Huh. Law is so interesting. I totally can understand why that one famous housewife women write to work, like, female equality... What was her name?
She has a, a difficult to pronounce, unflattering style name who became a lawyer.
Speaker 6: Note here, , while I say I w- don’t hold it against, , Coffeezilla for not understanding accounts payable, , maybe he did understand it and it just slipped his mind in this case because he has done really complex financial stuff into some of his other videos. So it’s, it’s almost sort of baffling to me that this wasn’t just like immediately top of mind for him.
But maybe -- he knows what accounts payable is, he just doesn’t know what happens with accounts payable during a business transaction, ,
Like even if she was being shady, even if the accounts payable she had had accrued for a year or two years, it would still transfer to Bricks and Minifigs. , It’s, it, it’s [00:10:00] irrelevant.
Although it appears very clearly that she wasn’t being shady because she specifically asked for her books before being kicked out to ensure that she did make the payments to him
Speaker 2: These are ones that haven’t-- he has not been paid his percentage yet, and if I don’t have the tickets, I won’t know how much I need to pay him. That, that’s a business thing and not necessarily yours. If, if taking on the business, he takes on all that comes on that part.
Speaker 6: because very few people... Simone and I have bought businesses before. That was our job in the past, to buy and sell businesses, which is why this is so incredibly salient for us and just seems like the simplest thing in the world.
, Which it should have been for the Bricks and Minifigs corporation. , And it seems to have been, because when the guy was making the transaction, he explained to her accurately, “When you do a acquisition, we take on the accounts payable.” , “That’s a business thing,” as he said. You know, that’s a, you know, simple understanding.
, Second here is, i-it’s not that Coffeezilla did nothing in their video. They did some really cool work. It was really cool when they showed the guy that he had all [00:11:00] this stuff in his own corporate records from his own corporate Google Drive, and the guy was like, “What?” And then, oh my God, that’s so cool, the, , U-Haul thing was really neat
Speaker 9: See the window, but the problem is it’s night outside, so you can’t see. And so I’m looking at everything I can, and there’s just nothing, you know? And I have this alternate angle, I’m looking at that. And then wait a minute. Zoom in on that photo. Bring up the brightness of this photo a little bit and my gosh, there’s a U-Haul in the parking lot right outside of the store the night of November 14th, 2024.
This is something that Matt said he had seen footage of, and it couldn’t be true. And again, I, I believe I have seen footage from that night that shows clearly out into the parking lot, and there’s no U-Haul. After seeing this, I said, “I really have to make a call.” And that’s when the story changed. So last night I talked with Matt McNeff.
I brought up this question of the U-Haul. He told me [00:12:00] emphatically there was no U-Haul. Y’all came to me this morning. You said, “Hey, we looked into it. There actually was a U-Haul there that night.” Can you clear up what that’s about?
Simone Collins: Actually, it, it is a good idea to do the, the Lego mini fig one, just to give people an update on what everyone’s missing, because that’s actually what everyone’s missing.
Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: I was, I was so annoyed by the Coffeezilla piece on it. I was like, it, it did- they’re obviously talking about keeping accounts payable, and the other company, you take on accounts payable. That is normal when you acquire a business. That is like Business 101
Simone Collins: If you do a stock purchase, the question is,
Malcolm Collins: we- we- If you do a hostile takeover of a store, you obviously take on that asset.
You, you take on liabilities and assets. If y- during a hostile takeover, you absolutely do.
Simone Collins: Yeah, I don’t know. I don’t know how it legally works with franchise agreements, like, how the corporate entities are related
Malcolm Collins: or not. Here’s another way to put it, Simone. It doesn’t matter how you took over a company.
If that company had a bunch of stolen [00:13:00] goods, goods that were legally not theirs in a storeroom- Yeah ... you don’t all of a sudden own all of those stolen goods just because you own the company now. Mm. That is functionally what the company did. They said, “Your paper only proves that the woman who we took over the store from didn’t own it.”
It’s like, no, it proves that you don’t own it because you only acquired her assets. Mm-hmm. You didn’t acquire other people’s assets simply because they happened to be around. That is the wildest thing ever. Like, I ... To think that you o- like, when you think about it with the stolen stuff, I think it becomes so much more clear.
To think that, “Oh, I bought a warehouse full of stolen goods, now I own all of the stolen goods,” everyone would be like, “W- no.” Or even worse, right? Somebody was renting a, a, a storage locker from me and stole a bunch of goods, and they defaulted on their payment so I took all of those goods. It’s like, th- that’s not how this works [00:14:00] at all.
And you’re like, “But it was illegal for them to have the goods there in the first place.” And I’m like, “That does nothing to help your case.”
Simone Collins: So you think for proper resolution, the accounts payable just needs to be paid out to this guy?
Malcolm Collins: Well, no. But the framing of the Coffeezilla where he tried to make it seem like it was over a very small amount of money, and that’s the- Yeah, I
Simone Collins: guess his framing, if I recall correctly, was just, like, the, the big thing is where are the missing Legos?
They either were stolen by a disgruntled employee or
Malcolm Collins: one of these- No, that’s literally not the thing, and that’s what I’m trying to explain. No, no,
Simone Collins: no. I, what I’m, what I’m trying to do is recap what his argument was, and I think that’s what his argument
Malcolm Collins: was, right? And it’s a stupid argument. We know where the missing Legos are, functionally speaking.
They were either sold in those early books, or they were inherited by the store. What he uncovered is that the vast majority of the money to be paid for this guy may not have been in the Legos in the store, but in accounts payable. Mm. That doesn’t mean the [00:15:00] previous owners did anything wrong. The, w- basically we know where they were.
They were sold. And we know the previous owners didn’t do anything wrong because we have the video where she explicitly says, “I need the books to settle my accounts.” Settling your accounts means paying out accounts payable. That’s what that means. They said, “No, don’t settle your accounts. We will manage it.”
That, that is, that was literally them. And then somebody could say, “Oh, that’s a low-level employee saying that,” or something like that. That low a level, even if it was a low-level employee, when they took custody of the books which managed what had gone out and what hadn’t gone out without going through with her, as you always do during a biggest acquisition, and she was trying to be nice in those videos and stuff like that.
Like, she was literally like, “Hey, let’s get on the same page about the accounts payable, about the the, the co- consignment stuff.” And they’re like, “No, I don’t want to get on the same page with you.” Mm. Because they knew, I think functionally what happened is they knew that the way they were shutting down the store was very immoral- Mm
and they felt really uncomfortable about it. So
Simone Collins: they- [00:16:00] Oh, like, “I’ve been told to do this. I’m just doing my job. This is corporate.” Yeah. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. They basically knew corporate had sent them to do something absolutely demonstrably immoral. And so even though she was willing to, and we see in the videos, obviously willing to talk them through everything they didn’t want to be talked through everything, right?
And that, that is on them. If I since, so like, if they’re like, “Oh, that’s a low-level employee. He doesn’t represent corporate or anything like that,” it’s not even the fact that he affirmed to her, “Oh, I know what’s in these books.” Corporate at any point could have gone back to her to get better accounting, and it appears that they never tried, right?
And it appears that she wanted to give them the better accounting. What corporate does, if I send let’s say I send an employee, and the employee is the one who actually shuts down the storage locker that’s full of stolen goods, right? That doesn’t mean that I, of a [00:17:00] company, am now not legally responsible for the fact that those goods are stolen and need to get back to their rightful owner.
Even if it’s an employee who shuts down the garage that’s full of cars that somebody had you park for them, right? That, that doesn’t absolve corporate from the basic financial accounting responsibility of determining the ownership of the assets of the property, especially when multiple people are telling you these assets are not what, you know...
Speaker 14: And a day or so ago, corporate released a, their timeline of events, and their timeline of events clearly shows that from nearly the very beginning, they were very aware of this consignment Lego set. So they can’t say, “We were unaware that she didn’t own this.”
Malcolm Collins: and the thing that always gets me is they keep saying, “We tried to give Brian Mansell all of this in the past.” Mm. Why can’t they provide proof of that? That would be very easy to provide proof of. Presumably it’s in an email, right? Emails are easily recorded. So [00:18:00] if they don’t have that email, then I don’t believe that.
And I don’t understand why they haven’t presented that email of them trying to give them back in the past. It seems like an obvious lie. But also one thing
Simone Collins: that- There’s, the, there’s disorganized stuff on both ends. Like, why did the original franchise owner s- provide spreadsheets of records so late as well.
I don’t know.
Malcolm Collins: Well, so the other thing that we’ve learned since the, the co- well, this was before the Coffeezilla piece, but he didn’t include it, is the way that Brian Mandzel originally acquired Bricks & Minifigs was through, in a really scammy way, suing his father for control of a company that his father had built.
And it appears that pretty much since day one, Bricks & Minifigs has been bleeding money. So he basically- Oh ... stole his father’s assets and used that to build his pet project company that he has never been able to get financially stable, truly. And that might also explain why they cared so much about such a small amount of money.
One, they’re just not good at their jobs, and then two, they feel [00:19:00] really pinched on money.
Simone Collins: Right. They, they actually- When you, when you- ... don’t have the money.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, like when you look at his house, when you see, you know, his, it, it doesn’t look like a house with someone with that much money, right? So it, it may have been that’s why he felt pressured to steal this stuff, but it’s still stealing.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. Well, and I mean, also, if the company’s not immensely profitable- You know, it, it probably isn’t run well. They don’t have good records, like all that kind of thing. You know, like it’s not... It’s just kind of falling apart, so. That, that makes sense.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Poor things.
Malcolm Collins: Anyway r- I mean, not poor th- th- the CEO’s not a poor thing.
He seems like a truly evil person. The, the way that he’s acting and the way that he’s responding, that he still has Ben under a gag order, you know, that’s why I have to release this episode. Mm-hmm. Maybe, maybe you can let Ben talk, right? This isn’t a normal thing to do in the world of YouTube, and I think he thought talking down to a YouTuber, he didn’t realize in the world of the actual world today, YouTubers are significantly more powerful than these big CEOs who think [00:20:00] they can talk-
Simone Collins: No, that’s why he did that.
He did that because he was getting severe amounts of harassment because
Malcolm Collins: of everyone getting his talk. Well, yeah, but cutting down the YouTuber only makes it worse. He needs to basically get on his hands and knees and beg the YouTuber. He
Simone Collins: can- Well, he doesn’t seem to understand that ...
Malcolm Collins: you know, he made- He thinks he
Simone Collins: can shut it down
Malcolm Collins: Brian, like everything with Brian. It’s like it’s not Brian you need to settle this with anymore. It’s Ben you need to... It’s Ben who you need to prostrate yourself to. And I know that that hurts your ego, but fundamentally, that’s the only way this gets right. But
Simone Collins: anyway. Sorry. No, no, no, it’s not Ben. It’s Brian.
Malcolm Collins: No, it’s Ben. It’s Ben. It’s the YouTuber that the CEO needs to be prostrating himself to, not the old man. He thinks he can make this right with the old man because it’s no longer about bricks and minifigs. The core issue now- Oh,
Simone Collins: it’s, it’s about the cover-up ... is
Malcolm Collins: about- It’s destroying
Simone Collins: FanTheFacts ...
Malcolm Collins: the way that he tried to stifle Ben’s investigation and Ben’s honest efforts to try to get this, and then tried to destroy Ben’s life through jail time, through these court [00:21:00] cases.
These are targeted, personalized court cases, right?
Simone Collins: That’s true. He
Malcolm Collins: could choose not to do this, but he didn’t. So, no, absolutely. It is... And this is what he’s getting wrong. He needs to get Ben to accept his apology to even begin to get anywhere with this, not Brian. Ben is his problem here. Ben- Mm-hmm
is not some kid anymore. Ben is the victim in everyone’s mind, and the core victim in everyone’s mind.
Simone Collins: Well, especially the way he filmed that I can’t talk anymore video against this dark hostage style background. But anyway- Yeah ... I have to go get the kids. I love you so much.
Speaker 12: What needs to be done next? What does that say? It’s saying we gotta use the wrong screwdriver to do it. Oh, no. It’s okay. Where did the wrong screwdriver go? I see a screwdriver right there. I’m [00:22:00] talking about the wrong one. See? There’s a Phillips head and a flathead. Do you know the difference between the two?
Speaker 13: What? One has an X at the end and the other one has a line at the end. I don’t- The one with the red handle- Oh, here’s, here- That’s a wrench. Oh. Oh, here’s, here
Speaker 12: you go, Tayn. This is the thing. Wait. Yeah, Octavian, it’s true that screwdrivers and wrenches are easier. No. Like, if you use that to turn- No, I don’t ... the screw in. Hey
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Malcolm & Simone Collins sit down with Nux Taku for an epic, wide-ranging conversation on the evolution of the online right, anime-to-politics pipeline, faith, culture war, and building a better future. From hentai reviews to biblical literalism, technopuritanism, abortion, consent morality, AI, demographics, and why the right feels like the “fun side” — this is one of the most unfiltered and insightful collabs in the nerd/tech right space.
Topics include:
* The journey from 4chan/anime degen culture to political commentary
* Why repentance & forgiveness are biblical traits that define the right
* Critiques of consent-only morality, abortion, and leftist degeneration
* Optimism, family, pronatalism, and raising based kids
* Conspiracy theories, Candace Owens lore, and truth-seeking
* AI, progress, and performative subversion on the right
If you enjoy Based Camp, Nux Taku, or discussions blending anime, theology, and red-pilled culture — hit like, subscribe, and share!
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone and Nux. This is the collab that was promised 3,000 years ago. We are so excited to be here with you. And what I wanna go into with Nux is exploring the evolution of this sort of new online culture that we share that has become, I don’t know, the nerd right, the tech right, the new right, whatever people wanna call it.
Because if you were to go to me five years ago, right? E- even five years ago, I mean, imagine 10 years ago, and you’re like, “Okay, so who are, like, the right-wing thought leaders on the internet?” And it’s like, “Well, the one we’ve got on now is a, a Jewish VTuber who used to do hentai reviews.” “... And then we’ve got fox girls.
We’ve got, like, five fox girls.” And I’d be like, “Are they furries?” And they’d be like, “No, they’re not furries, but they are fox girls. And then we’ve got, like, this slime girl, but it’s very important that you know that she’s a chimera slime. Then we’ve got Commie Mommy,” and people would say- Elf
Simone Collins: slime. Yes.
Malcolm Collins: Simone, am I not coming through?
Simone Collins: No, no. Just elf and slime girl. Like, it’s
Malcolm Collins: chimera. Oh, elf and... Oh yes, I’ve [00:01:00] got to get it right. Yeah. So Commie Mommy, and then people would be like, “Well, she, she can’t actually be, like, a socialist.” No, she’s actually a socialist, and she’s well-liked within our community.” And then it’s like, and then you got the top of the, the, the pack, and it’s this guy who, who lives like a homeless guy.
And I’d say to myself, like I’d be like, “Lives like a homeless guy? How does he not have any money?” It’s like, “Oh, no, he has tremendous amounts of money. Tremendous amounts.” But it’s so weird, this sort of world, and it’s a path that is not... Like, we, we in the past have tried to trace it from, like, the early online atheist communities to, like, the anti-feminist communities, then to, like, the anti-woke communities, and then to the modern right, and then it sort of, like, combined with parts of the red pill.
But you represent a different strand which comes out of the anime degen 4chan world, which we also come from as well. And I wanted to take this to sort of explore this journey, you as one of the leading content creators who sort of lived it, [00:02:00] and how your mind changed and the various points you had major inflections.
Nux Taku: Yeah, no, it’s de- it’s definitely a weird a weird area on the internet, for sure. I, I don’t know. For me it was, for me it was like, “Wow, I, I like making fun of retards and most of the retards are in politics. We have to start doing that.” I mean, that was the, that was kind of the thought process. Among other things, for sure.
I mean, I have to say, one of my biggest inspirations was Hasan Piker shocking his dog. That was, that was huge for me personally. Like, I, I’m like, this guy, he’s very well accepted in like the, the streamer world. You know, the, the pop culture. And I’m like, you know what? I, I want it to be as uncomfortable for radical leftists as for radical right-wingers.
Mm-hmm. And that’s what I did. I dedicated... And now no one wants to collab with Hasan. You know? Hasan was on The Ben Shapiro Podcast and no one wants to touch him anymore. You know, they got obliterated for it.
Malcolm Collins: You, you did a great job nuke- I mean, the JD Vance was like, “Oh yeah, of course. You know, the dog shocking guy, right?”
Like. It’s [00:03:00]
Nux Taku: cinema. It’s amazing. Yeah. The we-
Malcolm Collins: I actually
Nux Taku: think- I, I think- Okay,
Malcolm Collins: take it ...
Nux Taku: no, I think putting, making the face of the left like, you know, dog shocking, you know, womanizing, brothel enthusiast, terrorist supporter, that’s like the face of the left and it’s like, you wanna be on that side? So like you mentioned- You have, and I
Malcolm Collins: love that like on our side you have Asmongold, who literally, I don’t know any other human who would do this, doesn’t kill a cockroach growing, crawling on him, picks it up.
Who is that nice to a cockroach? Who is that pathologically nice? All right. And then leads it outside, right? And Hasan’s shocking his dog. But I think-
Nux Taku: Okay, I think, I think you’re taking the, the Asmongold thing like, a, a... It’s like, loves cockroaches, supports like late term abortions, right? That, that’s Asmongold.
You know? It’s-
Malcolm Collins: He still-
Nux Taku: You got a lot of interesting characters out
Malcolm Collins: here ... does Asmongold support late term abortion?
Nux Taku: Asmongold, he supports abortion a moment before birth. He supports it.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, really? I did not know that. We- Yeah. It’s interesting ... we have changed our views on abortion significantly recently.
There, there was a recent video on that.
Nux Taku: Really?
Malcolm Collins: People [00:04:00] should watch because it was the craziest video ever. It starts with a gang bang where like people got together
Simone Collins: and then- It starts with a, yeah, basically you know about Aila’s birthday gang bang, right?
Nux Taku: Who?
Simone Collins: Oh my God. So Ayla, a very famous sex researcher for her birthday one year in like 2024, so a bit ago I think decided to have a, a gang bang for her birthday because that’s how one celebrates in certain circles in the Bay Area with 42 men.
And one of her friends who helped to organize her organize it met her now future husband and, and father of her child at this gang bang. She was a fluffer. But, but, but
Malcolm Collins: in
Simone Collins: between- But she had this really terrible,
Nux Taku: Wait, y- you called her a sexual researcher?
Simone Collins: She is. Is that like a nice way to say a w***e?
She possesses some of the world’s best- Like, I’m trying to figure
Nux Taku: this out.
Simone Collins: No, so she, she has probably
Malcolm Collins: the world’s best data set. If you’ve ever seen those data sets of kinks and what they correlate to and like how they c- cross correlate, the trans community hates her ‘cause she always just says whatever she thinks is true. Yeah. We’re not promoting her lifestyle. But anyway, in between, in between this party [00:05:00] and her friend getting married she had this horrible abortion experience that she wrote about that radicalized a lot of people like us, because before I was like, “Well, u- up until they have neurons I’m okay with it.”
And now I’m like, “No, not even then.”
Simone Collins: Yeah, it’s,
Nux Taku: Look so- You should check it out ... so one thing, I, I hear you guys discuss a lot, like, your philosophy. I, I don’t remember. You have, like, a name for it.
Malcolm Collins: Hmm.
Nux Taku: It’s, like, about having lots of peers. Technopuritanism.
Malcolm Collins: Like, Evan- It’s
Nux Taku: our- Technopuritanism ... it’s
Malcolm Collins: our crazy religion.
Nux Taku: Okay. All right. Could, could you describe it in a few sentences, and then I’ll, I’ll let you know my... Like, i- if this is still part of the previous conversation.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Well, okay, okay, I’ll, I’ll, I’ll, I’ll say it before we go on with this, ‘cause one thread I wanna pick up on what you said earlier, and then I’ll get into this really quickly is you were saying you liked making fun of retards on the internet.
And I think in reality- Passion ... this was what was the through line between these various communities. If you go back to the very early days, where you had the people who are now, like, right-wing influencers who back then were, like, atheist influencers or whatever, right? [00:06:00] They just liked dunking on anyone they could see as, as stupid, and then they started to feel like the Christians aren’t as fun to dunk on as the feminists.
And then they started to be like, “Oh, the wokies are the most fun to dunk on,” or the Tum- the Tumblr people are. And it drove sort of this political chain. But as for us and our theological beliefs, the quickest version is we think that the... We have a biblically literalist reading of the Bible that is materialist and monist.
Meaning that we a, a, we think that when the Bible says in the distant future humans are gonna be raised again that it’s talking about like, a, a, a super advanced entity in the distant future that is all-benevolent because humanity keeps evolving a billion years from now. And wants to give everybody who lived a virtuous life as long of a good life as possible, so it resurrects them.
And we try to go through. And we’re literalist, too. Like, we try to take the, the, go through all the translations and show how it could mean this. It’s crazy, I know.
Simone Collins: I think more succinctly, it’s, it’s an accelerationist tech-forward, [00:07:00] descendant worship religion that is based on a literal interpretation of the Bible
Nux Taku: Interesting.
Wow. Okay. So I, I thought it was a lot more like materialist focused, right? Like, you know, we want- It is ... humanity to survive, so therefore... No, no, I obvious- so I think that if you follow the Bible, it’ll have the best outcome for your life anyway, right? So- Yeah ... even if you were, like, the ultimate atheist, you know, utilitarian, you should still follow the Bible because it’ll give you the best lifestyle regardless.
Malcolm Collins: Th- that’s one of the things that we, we did a video recently when I was like, being an adult is recognizing that sins are just, like, a list of things that will F up your life. It’s basically like God gave us a list of like, you know, don’t, don’t cheat on your wife. You know, don’t, don’t have gang bangs.
Don’t-
Nux Taku: Okay, so-
Malcolm Collins: you know, ... I
Nux Taku: don’t wanna, I don’t wanna- ... murder ... correct you here or anything. I don’t, I don’t mean to cor- there is no Bible verse saying don’t cheat on your wife.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, okay. No, th- there isn’t because in- I, I’m just saying ... early Judaism you could have multiple wives, and we talk about that.
[00:08:00] Correct. You’re absolutely right. But, Correct ... I’m sure there’s some line you could take to mean that. But the point
Nux Taku: being is that- Yeah. You know, don’t be, don’t be adulterous. I mean, I guess you could, you could read into that.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. I, and I actually agree with you on this. We point, we have whole episodes on the Bi- the, the when monogamy became a norm in Judaism.
But I don’t wanna... Th- that’s a, that’s a tangent. But the point being is, like, it’s just a bunch of stuff that’s gonna make your life worse. And it, it, as an adult as a kid I always felt like, oh, sins are things that are tempting, right? And it’s like humanity was given a list of like, don’t piss on the electric fence, and then immediately, like, a big portion of us just went immediately and pissed on the electric fence.
Because, I don’t know, we’re, we’re not supposed to do it or something
Nux Taku: Yeah, I suppose. But yeah, no, I, I agree with that. I actually think that morals come from there actually, you know. And, and in regards to Asmongold, like, I think Asmongold’s a really honest guy. So when, when I discuss the whole abortion thing, why my view has never changed really on abortion is ‘cause it says thou shalt not murder in the [00:09:00] Bible.
All right? So regardless, if, if a fetus is a human life, then killing it is murder, so therefore it’s bad, you know? So- And, and... Yeah? Sorry. No,
Malcolm Collins: so you’ve always had these views? Like all the way back to your early
Nux Taku: days or did you- Okay, so even in my early days, yeah, I had these views for sure. I, I definitely fleshed them out, my faith got a lot stronger.
But you know, basic stuff like don’t murder and don’t steal are pre- pretty consistent I think.
Malcolm Collins: Well, no, it’s, it’s very interesting because what I’m realizing from this conversation is a big part of the online transition has been people not coming to views they didn’t have historically, but feeling comfortable talking about them.
Nux Taku: Exactly. Exactly. A-
Malcolm Collins: actually, the irony is that you were less at risk of being canceled talking about pure degeneracy, like Metamorphosis or something like this- Absolutely ... than saying you shouldn’t have abortions.
Nux Taku: 100%. That, that, that’s the thing. The entire online space, be- it became super comfortable to hate God.
And it became super comfortable to follow, you [00:10:00] know, if you look at like leftist policy, it’s like a checklist of what Satan would tell you to do. You know? It’s like, you know, abort your babies and groom children and castrate them and, you know- Well- ... take money from people that earn it and give it to people that don’t.
I- that’s the list.
Malcolm Collins: And look at the toll that it leaves on these people. It’s not like they’re... I- if you look at like GDC and you see the people screaming at the sky, right? Like, that’s not a normal response. Like, that is somebody who’s had everything good taken from them in their life, and it’s
Nux Taku: really- Okay, but define normal.
Define normal. Sure. Y- your, the, your barometer only operates ‘cause you have a belief system. See, I define normal and morality based on God. All right? But, but if you view things as, well, I just want a good outcome for the most people, what does that even mean? What is good in that case?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, I think the, the, the morality thing that you’re talking about here is, is interesting because by the definitions of society right now, you and us are weird because we don’t follow the, the normative cultural ethical set, which seems to be highly [00:11:00] deleterious to people living, like, fulfilling lives.
Nux Taku: I, I agree with you. I, I think that if you ask your average, like, liberal, enlightened liberal what, what morality is, it’s just basically if there’s consenting adults, it’s fine. That- that’s their only tenet- Yeah ... basically, because they don’t want bad things to happen to themselves. It’s selfish inherently.
They wanna be able to live whatever debaucherous lifestyle they could come up with, and they don’t want anyone to step on them. So therefore, their belief system based on this preference is, “Oh, if everyone consents, it’s fine.”
Malcolm Collins: Well, I think it, it... W- I, I really like that you’re drawing attention to this because you can see from this view of consent being the core of morality, where we keep seeing leftists get in hot water ideologically.
W- one of the episodes we have, we go over communist regimes and how many of them tried to lower the age of consent to, like, super low ages, like 11 or 12 or something like that. And- Yeah ... some socialist parties did. And, and the reason is, is because in reality, the reason we don’t sleep with children isn’t about consent.
Like, we [00:12:00] allow mentally disabled people to have sex. We allow elderly people to have sex. If you’re talking about a 15-year-old or something like that, they have a mental i- intelligence that’s higher than a, a nine-year-old. N- nobody has a problem when a nine-year-old has sex. It’s not about consent. It’s about what it does to that person and the effects it has on their life, right?
And I think that w- we see the famous Ch- Chuck clip where he’s like, “I don’t see anything wrong with having sex with an animal if you were like the one in...” Do you... Are you... Have you seen this clip? Sure.
Nux Taku: Go ahead. Yeah, I love that clip. You re- you mean to tell me that the inbred Islamist thinks that you can have sex with animals?
Weird. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Funny
Nux Taku: coincidence.
Malcolm Collins: No, you don’t have sex with animals ‘cause of the negative effects that has on your life, and, like, the diseases and all of the other negative effects. See,
Nux Taku: but you know what? Y- you, you bring us to a fantastic point because if you forget God for a second. Mm-hmm. Try to explain to me under a liberal worldview why you should not have sex with an animal
Malcolm Collins: You, there, there isn’t a good explanation.
That’s what these people are realizing. They just know-
Nux Taku: Because [00:13:00] they, because they can’t consent? Is that it? No, obviously not- That’s, no ... ‘cause you can eat meat. You could literally kill it- Yeah ... and eat it.
Simone Collins: Yeah, but
Nux Taku: then- So consent
Simone Collins: is not the issue Most of them don’t eat meat. Like true-
Malcolm Collins: No, they eat- ... true vegans don’t
Nux Taku: eat
chunks,
Malcolm Collins: freaking veals, Simone Chunk does. Chunk eats meat They torture babies cows. This is business. And even if they’re m-
Nux Taku: not
Malcolm Collins: m-
Nux Taku: And even, even if they didn’t eat meat ... if they’re eating dairy ... it, it’s irrelevant. If it’s all consent based, then what’s wrong with having sex with a corpse? It’s dead. It can’t consent.
What’s the difference?
Malcolm Collins: That’s a good point. And- That is a
Nux Taku: good
Malcolm Collins: point. I, it- There is
Nux Taku: no reason- It’s, it’s not ...
Malcolm Collins: as a progressive.
Nux Taku: Isn’t it illegal to have
Simone Collins: sex with corpses? But from a
Nux Taku: progressive mindset, they’re... I don’t think so. But why? Why not? Like, they, th- there’s no consent required. Okay, why is incest immoral according to the leftist worldview?
Why is it immoral to have s- y- you consent and your sibling consents. Really true.
Malcolm Collins: That makes sense. I hadn’t thought about all of the things this breaks, but it breaks a
Simone Collins: lot. Yeah, but, but it is, I think it’s immoral-
Nux Taku: It does ...
Simone Collins: because it- Because- ... it’s, it’s rural coded, and rural coded is conservative coded, and if it’s conservative it’s bad.
So incest- Okay, well- ... has to be bad.
Nux Taku: Okay, to be fair, incest happens [00:14:00] mostly in like Muslim countries, which is left wing at this point. So like, I don’t know.
Simone Collins: Right. But no, no, no. Like, in, in the leftist mind no one thinks about the life of someone in a Muslim or Islamic country. They only think in terms of the United States, and then if someone is Muslim or other, they’re just good.
They’re just good. Oh. Trust me. I
Nux Taku: forgot
Simone Collins: about that. Yeah. So like, like I don’t know who they are. They’re better than I am. Their culture is enlightened. Mine is bad. And my extra bad people are the hicks in the countryside who screw their cousins, so you know.
Nux Taku: But, but the point I’m making though is from their logical standpoint that as long as everyone consents it’s fine.
There is nothing wrong with this.
Malcolm Collins: Absolutely.
Nux Taku: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well,
Nux Taku: that- And, and that’s, and, and that’s the degradation of every value and... Look, I think that it’s bad to have sex with your sibling ‘cause it says in the Bible not to have sex with your sibling. God said it actually.
Malcolm Collins: The It’s actually
Nux Taku: pretty simple
Malcolm Collins: the it, one thing I found pretty interesting that Simone said there is how leftists are not allowed to look at the reality of what it’s like in many of these countries, and I think we see an embodiment of that was Greta Thunberg [00:15:00] when she wouldn’t watch the voto- the, the video that like literally Hamas film- October 7th
Nux Taku: video.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Just like I don’t want to see reality because that interferes with the fantasy that I’m living in That was one
Nux Taku: I completely agree. If, I think, okay, so I mean, there’s a, a Bible verse, right? Torah Emet in Hebrew, right? That, Right ... the Torah is truth and or the Bible, the Torah is the Old Testament.
So essentially my, my perspective is if you are gonna continue going on your like anti-God path, you are going to consistently have an issue with truth. Reality is a major issue if you’re a leftist. You know, men could be women- Yeah ... and words don’t actually mean anything. And and Islamic countries are really actually based and good to gay people.
And you know, hon- and you don’t even need to live in reality at this point. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Nux Taku: Because reality is bigoted.
Malcolm Collins: So when did you first feel comfortable? Like explain, was there a moment when you first felt comfortable saying this stuff or like [00:16:00] voicing this and
Nux Taku: what
Malcolm Collins: changed?
Nux Taku: So I, I, I feel like I’ve always tried to be honest.
I’ve just decided on things that I’d rather not get into because, you know, why... Like if I’m making anime videos, I’m not gonna start talking about abortion, you know? Like why divide my, my audience in half by, you know, talking about something that’s completely irrelevant to whatever content I’m making is.
But as time went on and I started talking about like internet drama and Hasan Piker, you know, advocates for me to get killed by Hamas terrorists ‘cause he says I’m, I’m an Israeli Nazi even though not. But anyway, so a- as time went on, now that I’m talking about politics and things, I’m, I feel a lot more comfortable saying the things.
I’ve been backstabbed by enough people that I don’t, I don’t really care if you disagree with me. That’s your American God-given right, you know? So
Malcolm Collins: yeah. So if you were gonna like, how much of it was the people attacking you for saying things that you thought was reasonable that radicalized you to want to say more of that stuff?
Nux Taku: To be honest, it’s not that they attack me that makes me wanna say it, it’s that it’s considered [00:17:00] inappropriate to say. Like it is super inappropriate in public in American like- Yeah ... probably not in like houses and closed doors ‘cause everyone would pro- like a lot of people would agree with this, but if I say that gay sex is degenerate, that is considered like a, a super taboo in American online culture.
That is very true,
Malcolm Collins: yeah.
Nux Taku: Right? Because it’s two consenting adults, so what’s the problem, right? That’s the, that’s the through line. But but so I don’t really care if people come after me for my opinions. It’s, it’s- So, so for you- ... just that it’s not acceptable to say
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Oh, that is, that is really fascinating.
I mean, it’s, it’s very different from us. We sort of got radicalized by the left or, or radicalized by your channel. But like, ... it was like us originally going viral over just being like, “Hey, birth rates are low.” And then people freaked out about that, and they’re like, “Well, then you must be a racist.”
Nux Taku: Yeah. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And then-
Nux Taku: Because you can’t live in reality ...
Malcolm Collins: the thing that changed me the most was, like, the first time I started hanging out in [00:18:00] right-wing spaces or going to right-wing conferences, and I went and I was, you know, we’re... You know, you’re, you’re, you’re not... I, I don’t think you’ve done, like, a big face reveal or anything, so, so you don’t get noticed at conferences and stuff like that.
But like, going to conferences, having beliefs that I know are really outside of a lot of mainstream conservative norms, and I was afraid that I would be sort of grilled on them or made to feel like I wasn’t welcome or made to feel like an outsider, and instead I have felt the exact opposite, where when we were in leftist spaces, and we even did, like, leftist campaigning, politics, everything like that, it was a constant litmus test.
And I don’t think people on the right realize how much our side benefits from being nice to people who did things in the past that they regret now or are, w- in the process of changing and still being accepting of them
Nux Taku: So do you know my opinion on why that happens among right-wing people but not left-wing people?
Malcolm Collins: I, yeah give me your opinion. That’s
Nux Taku: [00:19:00] Because I think repentance is inherently a biblical trait. And forgiveness and repentance only exists if you could believe in God. Hmm. And if you are on the other side where it’s all about, you know, we’re all just a whole, a clump of atoms that are whizzing through a point, a purposeless space, then why ever repent?
Why ever do better? Why would I assume that you regret your mistakes and become a better person? I wouldn’t. It’s so much easier- Yeah ... to just throw you in the box. Whereas on the other side which, and more right-wing politics, obviously it’s not, not nearly conservative enough. Not, man, I wish Trump was the guy that the left thought he was, you know?
But- Yeah, right ... yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Actually, this is an interesting point in terms of making the lived sort of right-wing parties more conservative. One of the things that I think a lot of people a little, in our wider faction are annoyed with is in UK, you know, how progressive even parties like Reform or the AD- or A- A FDR in Germany or you know, MAGA in the United States and how do [00:20:00] you realistically shift the Overton window of what’s normal?
Like, what’s, what’s your thesis?
Nux Taku: That... So I, so ultimately every- all change takes time. Like, every time I see, like, the the accelerationists being like, “Oh, we have to vote for leftists so they can rape our country, and then- ... and then we’ll swing the other way,” it’s like, no, no, no. No, no. Trump is the swing, okay?
He is the swing the other way, and Trump is kind of a ‘90s liberal, you know?
Malcolm Collins: Like- He’s a very ‘90s liberal. He holds the- Yeah, we were
Simone Collins: just talking about this yesterday. He 100%
Malcolm Collins: is. It’s not just that he’s a ‘90s li- liberal, it’s that every one of his, like, top lieutenants was an anti-Trump leftist the first time he ran for office, whether it’s- Yeah
J.D. Vance or Elon or RFK- These-
Nux Taku: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: th- were all anti l- anti-Trump leftists, and now
Nux Taku: they’re all- And they, and they were all, they were all Democrats, and so d- you know, Joe Rogan was a Democrat, he endorsed him, you know. So I agree with you, and I think it’s mostly ‘cause the left completely went insane that you know, what, what was considered a [00:21:00] left of center person from the ‘90s is considered, like, the far right fascist today.
But I, I- Yeah ... think this stuff takes time, you know? I think that the, especially our generation is a lot more right wing than, you know, the boomers that are in Congress. So I think it takes time, you know? You keep electing more and more radical people as time goes on. You see someone betrays the, the tenets and, you know, you just get, get rid of them.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Get them out. Well, I mean, we, we are seeing this at rallies. I mean, obviously the famous saying, and I think you’ve covered this, is you go to the Biden rallies, the Su- No Kings rallies, and it’s a bunch of old people. Yeah ... and I, I hear this from our Israeli fans as well. They’re like, “All of the liberal parties in Israel are just like their parades are all super old people.”
Yeah ... a- and-
Nux Taku: Mostly women ...
Malcolm Collins: what, outbreeding them works. And in the- True ... United States we actually have a fairly decent fertility rate. This is, this is actually one of my biggest consternations about Nux, is you said that you were gonna stop streaming when you have a kid. And I was like, “I really want you to have a kid, but I don’t want you to stop streaming.”
Nux Taku: Well, when I said stop streaming, I [00:22:00] meant, like, live streaming. I would still be making videos probably. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: okay, okay ...
Nux Taku: it’s just, you know, when you’re live y- you wanna play with your kid, you know? You wanna, you wanna be there. So if you’re live streaming, you’re gonna be there for f- four hours in a row streaming.
You don’t wanna stop, you know. I’m not gonna pause, say, “Oh, sorry, gotta go play with my kid.” I’ll... So yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
It’s, it’s awesome,
Nux Taku: man ... so whatever.
Malcolm Collins: But anyway, I, we gotta, What would be the, a, a, a, a good place? Well, another thing I wanted to ask you about is your thoughts on the sort of online right being as ideologically diverse as it is. Mm. Like when you, you look at somebody like Asam Gold and his beliefs on abortion, or Shoe0nHead and her beliefs in communism or socialism and stuff like this, w- why do you think that we are this intellectually diverse?
Nux Taku: Again because I think to some extent repentance exists. You know, obviously I think that Asmongold’s takes on abortion are terrible. I think She Want Head’s takes on communism are terrible. You know, Asmongold because of thou shall not murder and you know, She Want Head ‘cause of thou shalt not steal.
But, Yeah ... [00:23:00] that said, I have faith. I have faith they’ll see the light because on the right you’re a truth seeker. You know? And that’s why- Yeah ... you have all the crazy conspiracy theories, ‘cause ultimately these people wanna figure out the truth.
Malcolm Collins: That’s
Nux Taku: a, I never thought about that ... they might get lost along the way, but on the left the truth doesn’t matter.
Men can be women on the left. N-
Malcolm Collins: The point that you made there that I’ve never thought about before is I’ve often joked to people when I first started going to, like, conservative conventions, the thing that shocked me the most is, like, everyone would just stop me and hand me, like, a printout of their private conspiracy theory.
It was like a conspiracy theory- ... like share lot. And I was like, “W- why are conspiracy theories so big?” And a lot of them turned out to be true, mind you. A lot. Like, a stupid amount that- They can be ... Caleb Tate was being funded by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Nux Taku: I could not... That was crazy.
Malcolm Collins: That just-
Nux Taku: Oh, my G- Worth, worth electing Trump just for that.
Malcolm Collins: That just- Really ... like happened and went and we don’t talk about it anymore.
Nux Taku: Yeah. Oh, my God. It’s insane. Insane.
Malcolm Collins: That, but- Like,
Nux Taku: there was so little racism that they had to pay for it. Unreal.
Malcolm Collins: They I, well, and I think [00:24:00] that it’s important, I mean, this is something we always fight for in our video, that like, yes, like racial groups, there may be reasons to have animosity or ethnic pride or pride in your culture, but if we make the right a space where other people don’t feel comfortable, then we’re not gonna win elections.
And I think it’s really important to- Also true ... counter those sorts of narratives. But fortunately we’ve done a good job. I mean, we pushed Nick Fuentes out of the party, right? Like, he’s a Democrat now. So that’s... No, he said, “I’m a moderate Democrat.” Yeah. Do you see that?
Nux Taku: Yeah, I saw that. And then he said that if the left ever wins I have to flee the country ‘cause they’re gonna kill me.
So, you know, whatever. I, I-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. All liberals ... a lot, a lot of
Nux Taku: what he says is hyperbole anyway, so you know.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Actually, how do you think about this? Because one of the things that I see the most in your channel, that I also see in his channel, is really sort of high, positive, happy energy. Is this something you do intentionally?
Is it just the way you are 24/7?
Nux Taku: I, I am generally a positive guy. I have faith, okay? I have faith [00:25:00] it’ll... It, it’s all part of the plan. You know, even, even the bad news is, like, secretly part of the good news. We just didn’t figure that out yet. So, no, I, I have a lot of faith that things are actually looking up.
I am generally an optimistic guy, and again, it says in the Bible to be happy. It’s like-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, the thing that I’m most surprised about on this stream that I was not aware of, of you is one, just how much you’ve always held these beliefs, and two, that these beliefs are all downstream. I don’t want to say like a, a, a, a, a wind-up Jew, but like they are what...
If you just followed all of the stuff that it said, all the stuff the religion said, it’s where you would come ideologically.
Nux Taku: I, I am a Pentateuch extremist. You had such a cool name for your ideology, I had to come up with one.
Malcolm Collins: But, Yeah. Make one up and con- convert people. Give it... I mean, our ideology is very heretical to the right, so you know, we’ll see.
But we got, we got followers now, too, so that’s, that’s cool.
Nux Taku: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: I mean, I belie- Look, I... If you go back, Jewish teachings, they often talk about heaven as a place in the future. They talk about, like, the sons of [00:26:00] man. Why would you need to talk about the sons of man? That’s a weird word, unless we were destined to colonize space one day and have different genetic variants of humanity.
Anyhow, I get too... but-
Nux Taku: I love this stuff. I could nerd out on this for sure. Yeah. Yeah. I, I have theories. I, I do too. I’m with you. If you think-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Oh, what, what’s your craziest theory? I w- c- let’s go craziest Bible theory.
Nux Taku: Craziest theory? I don’t think I have a craziest theory. What’s
Simone Collins: like any theory?
Any theory.
Malcolm Collins: Oh,
Nux Taku: a like Bible theory? The, dude, I, I’ll come up with one, I’ll tell you
Malcolm Collins: I’ll give you my Adam and Eve crazy
Nux Taku: theory.
Malcolm Collins: Sorry? I’ll give you, I’ll give you my Adam and Eve crazy theory, okay? All right,
Nux Taku: go for it. So,
Malcolm Collins: In Adam-
Nux Taku: All right, and then I’ll, I’ll give you one. I thought of one. I thought of one of mine.
Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Go for it. In Adam and Eve when I first started becoming, like, religious again and rereading these stories, I wanted to go to the ones that seemed on the face I didn’t understand it. I didn’t understand why God would punish man for wanting knowledge of good and evil. That didn’t sit right with me.
So then I went to the story, and I looked at what actually happened in the story, and we know that the first thing that man did when he got the knowledge of good and evil [00:27:00] was to clothe himself, yet I don’t think anyone thinks it’s sinful to be naked in front of God and your wife. So, and we know that God allowed him to be naked in the garden as well, so it, it said that he had the type of knowledge of good and evil that God had.
So clearly that’s not exactly what it meant. And then I thought about, oh, what is the idea of, like, shame around nudity around your wife and God? That’s man making up his own rules about what’s good and evil in opposition to God. And then I noticed that actually up until that point, man only had one rule, which was don’t eat from that one tree, and it said that he like, the, the, the, he, basically the curse sort of applied to him the moment he reached for the tree.
That’s when he gained the knowledge, not when he ate from it, because that was the moment he decided to disobey God and decided that man knows more about what good and evil is than God does. That’s my-
Nux Taku: That’s a good theory. I like it. That’s cool. No, that’s really cool. That’s a good- so, I mean, kind of on a tangent on, on yours though, before I, before I tell you my really kooky one.
Good [00:28:00] and evil is free will.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Nux Taku: Because if, if there would be no such thing as evil then, you know, we wouldn’t have some sort of- Oh, that’s a good way to put it ... evil inclination telling, telling us to do bad things all the time. We would just do the good things all the time. We wouldn’t even have the will to do bad things.
So evil, the existence of evil is the existence of free will. Hmm. And the reason why we exist at all in this world, like if you think about it, why, why did God need to create us at all? Like, what, what’s cool about us to exist? I’ll tie it into my cool, my other theory. If God- Tie it
Malcolm Collins: in. I’m interested to hear
Nux Taku: if God is everything, right? ‘Cause Go- God is, he fills all things, he surrounds all things, you know, he is everything, right? So that means technically we are all part of God as well. He’s everything. Now, he, he hides himself from us so that we have free will, but we’re also s- we’re still part of God to some extent.
So y- you ever hear like the the, like the God paradoxes? Like, okay, so if God could do anything, could God repent? Could God get better at things? And it’s like, no God’s perfect. I,
Malcolm Collins: I’ve heard these- But wouldn’t repenting- ... but I don’t [00:29:00] find them very compelling.
Nux Taku: Well, I, I, I have a way to... All right. So I’ll, I’ll finish my, my thing.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Nux Taku: If we are part of God, then us repenting is the part of God that could repent. So we are part of the perfection of God due to us being imperfect.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, that’s really clever.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: That’s really clever. That’s really clever. You should be proud of that one. I also have never heard that one in my life.
Simone Collins: Never, yeah.
Nor have I.
Malcolm Collins: That’s a good... Damn. Y-
Nux Taku: That, that, that one’s like a bit- That’s a good- It’s a bit of a mind f**k. Like if... Th- the issue with this one is like I feel like it sounds almost heretical. What, would you perfect God? It’s like, no, no, I don’t perfect God. God’s perfect. And all of his creations are exactly what he wanted them to be.
So all of his- Yeah ... creations are pa- part of God’s perfectness. And so our imperfection is part of God’s perfectness
Malcolm Collins: Wow. Okay, so here’s a, here’s a side question, right? You, in the early days, were into [00:30:00] stuff like anime and the, you know... I mean, you’re still into it. You watch Adventure Time. Adventure Time’s great, by the way.
Have you not actually watched all of Adventure Time?
Nux Taku: Yeah, it’s great. No, I haven’t. I haven’t.
Malcolm Collins: You gotta-
Nux Taku: I’m working on it. I’m working on it.
Malcolm Collins: When you have kids, you should watch that with your kids. I
Nux Taku: will.
Simone Collins: Our kids really like Adventure Time, but they also, I think they have, like, or ‘90s and ‘80s cartoons more, if we’re being honest here, so.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, we basically- Yeah ... only play ‘90 and ‘80s cartoons for our kids, like G.I. Joes and stuff. Makes sense. So they get the- Everything else is,
Nux Taku: like, gay.
Malcolm Collins: Truly though. They, they literally, like we’ll show them a globe and we’re like, “This is China,” and they’re like, “Okay, well maybe one day we should, we should take China and make them fight for us,” he said.
Nux Taku: Yes. Dude, kids are awesome.
Malcolm Collins: They really are. Awesome. Okay. Like,
Nux Taku: you ask a kid, “Should you win wars?” And your kids will be like, “Duh, of course you should win wars.” And then you ask, like, some UN politician, “Should you win wars?” “No.” Winning wars- For real ... is terrible. For
Simone Collins: real. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But, like, what drew you into the sort of antimate- anime and performatively subversive [00:31:00] world?
Nux Taku: Originally YouTube was a hobby. Like, you know, I liked anime and I, I needed an outlet. And and I started making videos on it, and I liked it. And then I started making fun of retards, like, in the anime world. And that evolved into, like, actually we could broaden our horizons. There’s a lot of retards.
, And, and here we are. But, but originally it was just a hobby. Like, I never expected to make money off this or anything.
Malcolm Collins: So it’s just like... Yeah, we have a, a larger theory on this. I don’t know if you’ve ever heard our theory on, like, what happened here, but if you go back to the ‘90s in the United States the conservative faction had two key cultural groups.
There was the the, the... What were the, what were the Southern people again called, Simone?
Simone Collins: Cavaliers.
Malcolm Collins: The Cavaliers which was a, a Deep South sort of aristocratic culture. And then you had the greater Appalachia region, which was the backwoods people, which had sort of an anti-aristocratic culture.
And when we look at, like, what this represented in the ‘90s, this is what we call truck nut conservatives or something like that, right? Like, the guy who’s obviously a conservative but puts, like, sexy women on mud flaps on his trucker, right? You know. He had this sort of performative subversion to him.
And what we’ve seen, we [00:32:00] can even see this in voting patterns, is that the right has moved more to this truck nut conservative type. And the reason is, is that the left- I have a theory ... the, the, yeah, the urban monoculture as we call it, ended up figuring out it could control people by saying, you know, “This is degenerate,” or bad or harmful to society.
And then as soon as you said, “Well, I’m not gonna do the things that are, you know, bad,” right, they can just grab that and constantly expand that category. So the only way that we as a movement were able to subvert that and even signal to other people within the movement, “No, I’m chill, bro,” is through su- subversion of, of cultural norms that are not inherently actually bad.
A, a good examp- You could... You were gonna say something?
Nux Taku: I, yeah, I, I think that, I, I thought what you were gonna get to is, like, it’s so weird how, like, you have all these, like, you know, trucker guys and, you know, they like sexy women and stuff, and it’s like they’re conservatives. Like, you’d think that they would [00:33:00] be, like, prudish.
I thought that’s what you were getting to.
Malcolm Collins: Well, no, there’s always been a part of American culture that was conservative in an anti-a- authority sort of way, at a, an anti-aristocratic sort of way, a way where-
Nux Taku: I think masculinity is inherently right wing.
Malcolm Collins: W- I agree. R- r- I agree with that. But I think that there there, there was sort of this fear of anyone, because the left uses this so powerfully, of anyone being able to call rank on us, you know?
I have the X degree. I have the X qualifications. I decide what’s right. I have
Nux Taku: X chromosomes.
Malcolm Collins: Right, yeah. And to fight that, we had to be subversive so that people would understand that we weren’t... Like, you don’t, Asmongold does anywhere in any of his videos, anywhere in your videos, do you signal that you think you’re better than other people.
And-
Nux Taku: I don’t think I’m better than other people. Yeah ... I think that everyone was created in the image of God. But I think some cultures suck s**t and we don’t need to import them here.
Malcolm Collins: That is true.
Nux Taku: And it’s not, you know, that, that is not, like, a [00:34:00] contradiction.
Malcolm Collins: But this is- Yeah ... super common on the left.
Like, Hasan’s outfits, if you look at the cost of, like, his basic outfit, his dog being the most expensive dog breed in the world. Right. Right?
Nux Taku: W- which he electrocutes, by the way. Don’t
Malcolm Collins: forget. Which he electrocutes, yeah. And it’s caused really interesting phenomenon that have given us a cultural edge in the current landscape.
One really big one is the left somehow became the anti-AI party and the right’s, like, a super pro-AI party. And we’re the ones that g- have our sky brows and our, all of these AI music videos- Yeah, yeah ... and stuff.
Nux Taku: Again, I, I think, I think, I feel like so many of these things are, like, the same issue just repackaged.
It’s because the right realizes that reality is real. AI is not leaving, okay? So yeah, artists are gonna lose their jobs, and that sucks for them, but that’s called progress, and I’m sorry that happened, but life moves on. You know, a lot of seamstresses lost their jobs when sewing machines were invented.
Yeah. Does that mean we should not have sewing machines? And the left, [00:35:00] because the left has decided that you know, they, they basically, you know, have become the party of the, you know, anti-reality retards. All right? They, they hate AI because they would like to still make believe that AI is not happening, and that’s not real life.
True.
Malcolm Collins: No, and, and that’s, I mean, that’s a strong argument for AI. There’s just nothing we can do about it. And if we do do something about it, then we become like Europe and we drop off the, the global economy- Yeah ... and China ends up crushing us.
Nux Taku: Yeah, absolutely. AI’s here. It’s here to stay. It’s not going anywhere.
People are gonna use it. Make the most of it. Yeah. Don’t be a victim.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I, I think that there’s also sort of the, this sort of also performative, performative subversion that we see in AI, like Skybrow’s Cream of the Slop, this idea of like, yeah, okay, it’s AI slop. Whatever. It’s still fun. And-
Nux Taku: There’s a self-awareness there
Malcolm Collins: yeah. Well, I mean, it’s become the part... It reminds me of the scene in Madagascar, a children’s cartoon. I don’t know if you’ve seen it where they- I’ve seen it ... th- th- you’ve seen it? Mm. Yeah. Where they, they divide a, a, an island into the fun side and the not fun side. And in the [00:36:00] not fun side- ... he’s just sad about being trapped there, and his sign collapses to say, “Hell.”
And in the fun side, they’re all having fun, right? Like they’re, they’ve made a little tiki hut. They’re drinking their fake drinks, spitting them out afterwards, of course, ‘cause it’s all seawater. You know, none- everything isn’t actually perfect, but they get to have fun and pretend like it. And coming to the right, for me, felt like coming to the fun side.
Like, y- yeah, you know?
Nux Taku: Yeah. You know, you don’t have to t- not everything is super serious. I mean, like, on the left they think mental illnesses are superpowers, you know? So th- they’ll sit there and collect mental illnesses like they’re Pokemon and and you’re gonna be surprised that these are, like, the most miserable people on the planet?
Malcolm Collins: A- a- admittedly, Candace Owens probably does too, right? You know. But we- You
Nux Taku: assume she’s right-wing ...
Malcolm Collins: Fair. Very, very fair. Yeah, she has a lot of leftist positions. Yeah. But I would s- I, it
Nux Taku: w- She, she used to run a website called Social Autopsy. Did you hear about this? Y- you
Malcolm Collins: know, that- [00:37:00] Yeah ... she, she, was it, like, anti-bullying?
Go, go into, go into the lore.
Nux Taku: Yeah. So, so anti, Social Autopsy was, like, this website to basically dox right-wing people. Like, you know, of course, this is the classic leftist tactic. It’s like, oh, right-wing people that believe in literally anything, oh, they must be bullies, so we have to destroy them and ruin their lives.
And she was a leftist, like one of these crazy radical leftists that would actually dox people until she realized that the grift was better to be, like, the, the Black woman against BLM, you know? And and that was her new grift, et cetera. Y-
Malcolm Collins: you know she thinks Charlie Kirk was a time traveler
Nux Taku: Well, she does think that Israel and E- Egypt are working together with Sumerian time travel technology to kill Charlie Kirk ‘cause he was an X-Man.
Simone Collins: Someone’s got to.
Nux Taku: Yeah. Yeah, I guess.
Malcolm Collins: We have an episode on this, Psychosis Maxxing, if you guys wanna watch it. It’s f*****g crazy-
Simone Collins: Oh, that should be so great ... her world perspective. But no, truly, like her unholstered schizophrenia has actually been very profitable. I mean, unfortunately she is a case in which some form of, I don’t know what it is, but it’s working for her, like really [00:38:00] well.
God. Whenever we criticize her- Yeah ... like people are coming into our comments being like, “Well, but I love it.”
Nux Taku: I
Simone Collins: get those too ... “She’s got some great points.”
Nux Taku: And, and then I, then I had to make like a whole like hour and a half long video just piecing apart all of her... She says that the Jews invented dinosaurs to trick Christians into thinking God isn’t real.
Malcolm Collins: That-
Nux Taku: There are so many layers to that one sentence- Jews invented dinosaurs ... it’s
Malcolm Collins: unreal ... it’s unbelievable. Like what? All that-
Simone Collins: That is a yes and. The only response to that is yes, and. Come on. To give
Malcolm Collins: her credit, she doesn’t just rehash old conspiracy theories. Her world is almost like Tolkien’s world, where like she invented a totally new world of conspiracy theories.
Yeah.
Nux Taku: Okay. You are giving her way too much credit. She takes every old conspiracy in the book and then just blames the Jews for it. Okay? Actually, it’s the oldest style conspiracy theory.
Malcolm Collins: That is an
Simone Collins: interesting twist. It adds color. It’s more fun with Jews, though. I mean, let’s, it’s, it
Nux Taku: just- Yeah, Jews, they’re great.
Simone Collins: It’s like adding salt to a dish. Jews. Like you need it. It’s, it’s the MSG of, of lore, you know? It’s just-
Nux Taku: Sure, sure.
Malcolm Collins: I mean, but [00:39:00] realistically- Great ... this, I mean, this is where we are on our channel on this, and everyone’s always like, ‘cause we get some people on our channel who are like anti-Jew or whatever.
I’m like, bro, the only people who matter in the future are the people who have lots of kids and still have technology. Some groups have a lot of kids and they do it by give, give, not having technology or not being economically productive. There’s only two groups on earth that have that right now, and one of them is the Jews, and they’re even beating us at fertility rates, right?
So, we’ve gotta take that seriously, right? Like the, the, being partnered with them is a lot better than being on their bad side, or that becomes the new human war, US versus Israel. But-
Nux Taku: I mean, I, I feel like there is a reason why there are so many foreign governments that are doing everything in their power to kind of be like, “Oh my God, do you, do you believe Israel is, you know, killing terrorists that are trying to kill them?”
It’s like, what? You know? And you know, doing everything. Like you have Russia promoting Candace Owens and, and Tucker Carlson, and you, k- Tucker Carlson’s buying a house in Qatar. I love America so much. I’m buying a house in Qatar . [00:40:00] You know? It’s like, all right, dude. Crazy. Yeah, sure. Right? Well, I gotta- And so many of these
Malcolm Collins: I think a part of it is and we have an episode where we go over this, is that the internet has shifted of who the primary viewer is over the past 10 years, and now your average internet viewer is a third worlder.
And a lot of these people don’t realize, like, they’re... W- why, why, like why all the, the weird Indian hate in, in the United States? Like, yes, there’s problems with them and jobs and everything like that, but they’re not as big a problem as the people, like, murdering us on the streets and stuff like that, right?
And it’s like, well, because this matters to third worlders. Jews matter to third worlders. Like all these, you know, M- Middle Eastern countries, the, the Jews is what they think about every day. And so I think some online influencers don’t realize that they have really just captured a third world audience.
Nux Taku: Don’t realize or don’t care?
Malcolm Collins: Don’t care. You’re right. I mean- I mean,
Nux Taku: you have someone with the million views. Yeah, it’s from packing-
Malcolm Collins: Sneako, right? Hey. Sneako just, just speed running that.
Nux Taku: Bro, Sneako, he’s like, actually [00:41:00] retarded. It’s amazing.
Malcolm Collins: He’s like, “I wa- I wanna be s-” Oh my God ... specifically make all of my content maximally appealing to third worlders.
Nux Taku: He, he’s amazing. He’s amazing. I- Sneako’s incredible. It’s a, it’s train wreck in slow motion. You know, bro goes out there to piss off the Christians and he’s like, “Oh, Jesus wasn’t white. Oh, Jesus was a Jew from Palestine.” Yeah, I’m sure he was. I’m sure he was. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: You’re, you’re,
Nux Taku: So you mean to tell me that the Jews are indigenous to Palestine, Sneako?
Malcolm Collins: “No, no, what do you mean?” That, that’s wild. Yeah, no, I... Your, your video on him, this, this was one of the fun things for me recently is, i- you were looking at his numbers and you’re like, “Look at how terrible these numbers are,” and I was like We’re, we’re not that much bigger. But I’m like, “But I guess he’s in decline.”
And then when I heard that he- Okay,
Nux Taku: hold up, hold up. Th- that’s not fair. First of all, you cannot compare. Sneako has millions of subscribers, he’s well-known, people talk about him, he’s like public, he- p- in the public discourse, he was on every big show. You know- True ... he was col- he collabed with every big guy on the planet.
Adin Ross, and Andrew [00:42:00] Tate, and Nick Fuentes, and he was on Piers Morgan, and he hung out with- True ... Kanye West. He was with all the big guys, and no one wants to watch his slop.
Malcolm Collins: That is true. Which is stupid as f**k ... but the thing that gave me heart recently was learning that you didn’t get to 100,000 views until your fourth year of doing this, and we’re only at year three now.
That’s true. So we’re, we’re- Yeah ... on track to hit your numbers if we just never stop.
Nux Taku: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: which is okay.
Nux Taku: Look numbers are ... l- it was definitely a big trade-off when I decided, you know what, I’m gonna be I’m just gonna say all the things that I like instead of just become, be generic normie slop.
Like, at some point I was just like, “I’ll just do all the YouTube drama. I won’t, like, have any edgy opinions.” And I was like, “Why? F**k that s**t, dude.” I want, I want the world to be better for my kids, you know?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. No, I mean, the, it, it’s fas- when we first came, even with our reboot in this channel our entire, like, theme with the channel and goal with the channel was just, like, basically, like, effective altruist philosophy, right?
Like, r- r- r- really basic leftist high-minded philosophy, because back then I still had this desire to be [00:43:00] seen as, like, this intellectual, and I think shedding that desire and realizing that I wanted to be seen for who I was and, and, and as a culture warrior it was something that I was only able to do.
And again, I really want to just emphasize this to people on the right, because when we started to make those transitions, people on the right supported us and they were nice to us even though we had only just begun to transition. And well, I mean, look at you coming on our show, for example, and you’re so much bigger than us.
You have no reason to do this other than just being completely magnanimous, right? It, it, it-
Nux Taku: It’s
Malcolm Collins: really
Nux Taku: nice of you ...
Malcolm Collins: it only- No, it’s
Nux Taku: purely selfish. I just think you guys are cool and, Oh ... I wanted to do this.
Malcolm Collins: But I want to... Actually, what I wanna talk about before we close this out, because this is something I talked a, a little bit about, and we can see if we can get fans involved if they’re interested in this.
But I’ve been thinking about setting up some form of formal sort of political organization for the- wider sort of cultural movement that we represent. Because, you know, when I go to my friends at like the Heritage Foundation or whatever, and [00:44:00] I’m talking to them about like, “You know, like I, I don’t think like censoring furries is gonna play well among a lot of right-wing people.”
And they’re like, “What are you talking about?” I’m like, “Well, you know all the fox girl VTubers.” And they’re like, “What are you talking about?” And I’m like like maybe we need like- ... some, some form of i- even, even an outreach group.” So I was thinking like, what if we try to set something up and get some buy-in from the various big name voices in the movement so that they can guide.
Because I don’t want something where like I’m guiding policy. Something like a, a Turning Point USA, but that’s focused on this sort of nerd right faction. What are your thoughts on putting something like that together and even the utility of something like that?
Nux Taku: It sounds really cool. I, I, I wonder what the major purpose is, and I, and I’ll explain what I mean.
Turning Point USA is successful and incredible because frankly it’s an alternative to the college slop.
Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm.
Nux Taku: Right? You know, you go into- Mm ... the college system, and you’re literally, th- they put the, the, [00:45:00] you know, the, the hypnosis screen in front of you and they, they just replay images of whatever the f**k they want to in- you know, install in your mind.
So I think Turning Point USA is an alternative. It’s like, “Hey, you could follow that path and be an incredibly unhappy cat woman with debt at the age of 60. Or you could follow our path, and you could like have a family and be successful.” And it’s like, wait a second. That makes- Hold up. You know?
Actually, I, I- So Turning Point USA is really effective there. When it comes to I, I guess our movement or the, the new right, the online right, I, I don’t know if it needs a grass gr- grassroots idea.
Malcolm Collins: That’s actually a really good point. I, I think you just need to- Those things are... Now that I think about it, you’re right.
They’re sort of over and useless now. We, we actually were going over how if you look at Ben Shapiro, he appears to just be buying everything now or buying ads on things. Yep. And treating... His organization is just like a fundraising organization that pretends to be able to influence policy. And this reminds me, one of the anecdotes I say is when the new administration was being [00:46:00] staffed, this version of the Trump administration, the network they were tapping was the Founders Fund network and not like the Heritage Foundation and stuff like that.
Like, we had to make the intros for the Heritage Foundation people. And what I realized is I think even like the ins- the, the true MAGA, like who are staffing things, they’re like, “We’re not staffing. We’re not allowing these people to influence our policy anymore. We’re just taking like based Doge kids.”
By the way, you know, my brother worked at Doge.
Nux Taku: No way.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah,
Nux Taku: yeah. Dude, that’s awesome.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Huh. That was,
Nux Taku: I’m a big fan of Doge. I wish they would’ve been like even more successful.
Simone Collins: Same.
Malcolm Collins: They, they did some really cool stuff. Now
Nux Taku: to something
Malcolm Collins: completely different.
Nux Taku: But that’s where like
Simone Collins: I’m hesitant- They, they shut down-
about policy in general. I, I, I have my doubts that like- Any, any sort of policy change is gonna make a, a difference at this point or like going into politics matters I
Nux Taku: mean, I think we, we need to get rid of the government. Okay? I
Simone Collins: only
Nux Taku: want the government- That’s, that’s my only conclusion here ... to exist for law and order.
I just want law and order. Arrest the criminals, [00:47:00] close the border, win wars if you need to fight them. Other than that, I really don’t wanna hear about you guys
Simone Collins: Well, and the writing is kind of on the wall. Like what we talk about a lot is demographic collapse, and when you look at just how tax bases are going to crumble, how social services won’t be able to be supported anymore, how our government’s basically going to start printing currency in really unsustainable ways- Yeah
until it no longer matters like there, there will be a point at which there is going to be actually very significant various forms of turnover in the government. So I’m kind of like, well, I guess I’m just gonna- So
Malcolm Collins: like Social Security, how long till it goes broke?
Simone Collins: I think 2032. 2030 something.
Yeah, 2032. Well, my concern is, like there’s two ways it can go. Either at, at that year the trust fund’s gonna run out to the point where y- the existing senior citizens receiving Social Security payments will have like 32 or something percent less of their monthly checks. So they’re gonna be super pissed while like Gen Z and Gen Alpha and millennials and everyone else is still paying into it knowing that they’re not gonna get anything, and the people who are getting their money are mad about it and resentful.
So everyone’s [00:48:00] gonna be really angry about it. Or they’re gonna do something where they just totally throw the rules out the window and they’re like, “Oh, never mind, everyone gets to keep their money,” and they just kind of print it out of nowhere. And- It’s
Nux Taku: almost like Social Security is a form of communism that doesn’t really work.
Simone Collins: Yeah. We live in a huge, like just in terms of social services, like we are in such a socialist state now. If you are at or near the poverty level, the amount of support that you get from your state and the federal government is, is kind of humbling, and we didn’t realize this until we looked into it. But like in most cases especially if you ca- have kids, food assistance home assistance, free childcare, i- like really in- intense levels of support that are, are, are...
Oh free healthcare, which is like huge. So you kind of do live in a socialist utopia if you are at or near the poverty level. We
Malcolm Collins: offer many times the social services cost adjusted than China does.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Like in China- Which is another- ... public school isn’t free. In
Nux Taku: fact, our, our social services, I’m pretty sure they, they out...
Like th- if you combine the military budget and the foreign aid budget, it’s still [00:49:00] dwarfed by the social services.
Malcolm Collins: Oh,
Simone Collins: yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And then of course pensions and then of course like debt servicing. Like it just- I mean, the true
Malcolm Collins: enemy of civilization-
Nux Taku: Again, I, I mention I am a, a Pentateuch extremist, okay?
All right? Like the- Yeah ... it, there are, there is no communism in the Bible. None of it, actually, you know? That’s unfair. You give whatever-
Simone Collins: What is your point? ...
Nux Taku: 10% to charity, okay? Charity, whatever, whatever you wanna define as charity. And other than that, what you make is yours. From the sweat of your brow you should eat bread.
Simone Collins: There you go.
Nux Taku: And that’s it. And I’m tired of it. The, one, one of the first chapters in the Bible is like Abraham, he goes to Ephron to buy a, a plot of land where he could bury his wife. And he’s like, “Hey, I would like to buy the land.” And Ephron’s like, “No, no, you don’t need to buy the land. Just bury your wife here.”
And he’s like, “No, no, no, I’m buying the land. We’re not, we’re not getting into this.” This like, “Oopsie whoopsie.” And he’s like, “Okay, it’ll cost X amount.” And and he bought it, and it was his. And you know what? We still know where that land is exactly in Hebron. We know where it is. We know that you know, all the patriarchs and matriarchs are buried [00:50:00] there et cetera, et cetera.
And it’s like it’s still there, you know? There’s no, no repossessing- Yes ... you know, redistributing. I-
Simone Collins: And in,
Malcolm Collins: I did not know that that was still known or wasn’t. The the I- I mean we also know from, you know, Adam and Eve and everything like that, that like we are supposed to live with having to, to work the land.
Like, we’re supposed to have to work to support ourselves, and it
Nux Taku: makes- And so do you wanna hear another theory?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, o- ca- continue.
Nux Taku: Yes. Another theory. So God, all right, th- this is the same topic. God cursed both Adam and Eve when they ate from the tree of knowledge, right? Mm-hmm. So Adam’s curse was the sweat of, from the sweat of your brow you shall eat bread, all right?
Meaning you have to work to eat, as opposed to just, you know, God’ll just give you all the things for free. And Eve’s punishment was, you know, men will rule over you and it, you know, it’ll be painful. The child birthing process will be painful, right? So that was Eve’s punishment. Now I would argue not only, first of all, obviously true, right?
Yeah. That, that actually did happen to humans for, since then. That’s one. But [00:51:00] two, it’s necessary. It’s part of our psyche to feel fulfilled as people to exist in a system where the man works and where women are ultimately respecting men.
Malcolm Collins: We- and we actually, this is another one of our spicy takes, but we, yeah, we argue that as well, that like God was not being capriciously cruel to humanity by giving what we interpreted as curses, but giving us a way of living that is fulfilling, and that as we have shaken off this way of living, we realize that this was more like training wheels than a genuine punishment.
Simone Collins: Yeah. And things
Nux Taku: like, And now you have, and now everyone’s depressed. Yeah. Like, the men don’t work and they’re depressed. Now the women don’t have kids and they’re depressed, and it’s like-
Malcolm Collins: And they’re not a little- Yeah, yeah ... depressed. Right now the average kid at school, during COVID it was one in four, now it’s one in five, the average girl makes a plan to un-alive herself on any given year.
That is how sa- that is how-
Simone Collins: Well, the weird thing is, is- Damn ... women in the absence of pain crave pain
Malcolm Collins: This
Simone Collins: is CDC
Malcolm Collins: stats, by the way. Not,
Simone Collins: like, a,
Malcolm Collins: a right-wing conspiracy
Simone Collins: Yeah, [00:52:00] but I mean, if you look at just anecdotally, women in the absence of pain crave pain. When women live in... Like, if, if you look at spoonies, they’re majority affluent teen girls who basically have no other pain in their lives, and they’re like, “I’ve been developed-” Well, look at, look at women’s books
“This mysterious disease” It’s all, like, dystopian futures where they, they live in- Yeah. Yeah, women growing up in, in peaceful times with no conflict love to read dystopian teen novels. I’m reading Lena Dunham, L- Lena Dunham, Dunham’s fame sick biography now, and, like, she had horrible partners who would do violent, awful things to her ‘cause she grew up in a, like, loving family that always supported her.
Like, there’s... It’s kind of sick how people respond when, yeah, they grow up in sort of the absence- ... of pain and strife. It, it is one of those things where like, yeah And if, if you
Nux Taku: ever wanna get radicalized, you go into, like, a Barnes & Noble women’s section-
Simone Collins: Yeah ...
Nux Taku: and it’s like, yo- Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: we
Nux Taku: talk about
Malcolm Collins: that. I get
Nux Taku: so- We- You know, woman was raped by a werewolf billionaire and fell in love with him.
I, I- It’s like-
Simone Collins: Living the dream
Malcolm Collins: We, we get so annoyed by... Because there’s some right-wing influencer, women especially, who are like, “Oh, it’s all of this [00:53:00] male porn that, like, radicalized men.” I’m like, “Men didn’t make 50 Shades of Gray a bestseller.” Yeah. Men didn’t make The Monster at Barnes & Noble, right? Like-
Simone Collins: No, l- legit, men don’t wanna do that on average because it’s too much effort.
This is definitely a female fantasy. Men are like, “I don’t have... I don’t, no.” I
Nux Taku: mean, I, I think also because men, men are mostly stimulated by, I guess, superficial attributes, I would say. You know? Mm-hmm. A sexy woman, and that’s it. Men, he’s good. You know, you see some curvy piece of driftwood and, you know-
men are like, “We can figure this out.” But for women-
Simone Collins: No, no, like literally- ... I think a lot, a lot of it’s- ... Malcolm and I had a conversation last night ...
Nux Taku: you have to get emotionally
Simone Collins: invested, you know? Yeah. We were... I, I... Like, Malcolm walked up to me last night and I was like, “Malcolm, how do... With sex dolls, how do they deal with, like, the off-gassing scent?
Like, doesn’t that really... Like, there must be some way.” Malcolm’s like, “No, Simone, they don’t care. Like, it looks like a woman.” Like, I’m talking about for real dolls, like, the, the life-sized ones. Yeah. And I’m, like, thinking about how, like, well, it must smell too much like plastic. Like, how do you deal with that?
And he’s like-
Nux Taku: Men do [00:54:00] not care. Men do not care.
Simone Collins: Oh, well. Anyway.
Nux Taku: You know- So I think w- a- get- the Monster F****r Island Barnes & Noble, that’s just as porn as any male porn. Oh,
Simone Collins: it- Oh, yeah. Yeah. Like- Yeah ... but not, not even that, just, like, all, all the erotic materials. Women consume way more erotic materials, period, than men.
And pay way more for it. And the, and the industry’s bigger. It’s, it’s more, there’s more money there. There’s more time there. And women are just openly reading it like, in public. It’s just no shame. They’re, they’re learned women. It’s book talk. It’s great. They, they talk about
Nux Taku: it. The whoreification of society.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. True. True. Well, it has been great. I do not want to take up too much of the time of, of Nux. I want to have a channel where you can reach out to us whenever. One thing I want to end with, with people, because I think the, what one of our goals should be to make people’s lives better, and that’s, you know, if, if you’re watching this, go out and try to learn something new.
You know, learn how to use AI in a new way. Learn how to use some tool in a new way. Society right now is changing faster than [00:55:00] anyone could imagine, and we’re seeing it in our community to an extent that astonishes me, because I get so excited when I see, like, Sky Browse and stuff like this, or Holy Ball.
You know, when I see these, these content creators who are pioneering entirely new ways of doing stuff and you, you can be that. Any of you can be that in, in, in new ways. And look for a sp- a s- a spouse, a partner. Try harder.
Nux Taku: Yeah, that, that’s what I was gonna say. You know? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, get married, have babies.
It’s awesome.
Simone Collins: Totally.
Malcolm Collins: Really makes life awesome. Well, spectacular. I’m gonna turn the recording off and, Oh, anything you wanna say at the end? Any-
Simone Collins: Yeah, anything you want people to go to, check out,
Nux Taku: whatever. I’m, I’m good, I’m good.
Malcolm Collins: Everybody knows who you are. I’m
Nux Taku: the Blue Jew. I wander over YouTube.
Malcolm Collins: Right there. Like, we have, like, you’re, like, our fifth most over subscribed channel, so just... End recording? Oh,
Nux Taku: hell yeah.
Simone Collins: Oh. I’m trying to get Tex to eat, and I, I took a little video ‘cause the one thing that he actually does wanna put in his mouth, ‘cause I, I keep giving him stuff obviously he immediately just, you know, like they fall out of his mouth, right?
That’s what... [00:56:00] It always happens, right? They look kind of,
Malcolm Collins: afraid,
Simone Collins: and then it falls out of their mouth. And the, the one thing that he likes that I’ve noticed he chews on is veggie straws. So I’ve, you know, let him chew on like the odd veggie straw here or there, and he was chewing on them this morning, and I was taking this video of him, and he just starts-
Malcolm Collins: Octavian thought it was the funniest thing ever.
He came in. He had to tell me. He goes, “Mommy was filming.”
Simone Collins: I thought, “Oh, let’s capture his first moments eating.” I don’t want our kids to, like, think that... You know how there’s the trope of, like, the first kid has, like, a billion photos. You get bored after the first few? Yeah, okay. Yeah, like, yeah, like second kid, no photos of anything, you know?
And I don’t wanna be that mom, and I’m trying to capture these precious moments. And what does Tex do? What does Tex do when I try to capture a precious moment? He’s like... Immense amounts- I’m sorry you had to deal with that ... of liquid. He, he doesn’t like drinking that much, so I don’t know where it’s coming from.
Malcolm Collins: I am very sorry you had to deal with this.
Simone Collins: It’s a pleasure
Yeah, see, [00:57:00] he doesn’t wanna drink. You have no interest in drinking. You just wanna wave your hands and grab my headphones.
Oh, he’s here. Hey. Oh my gosh, that’s a good background. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: we got an American flag in the background. That’s fantastic.
Simone Collins: That’s perfect.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins: Okay. Can we hear him? Yeah, I was thinking,
Nux Taku: like- Go ahead ... do, do I put an Israeli flag in the... No, I’m kidding. Yeah.
Simone Collins: Oh. That would’ve been-
Malcolm Collins: I would, I would troll people
wonderful. They’re gonna get some, Yeah ... spicy comments from that. Oh. For
Simone Collins: real.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Nux Taku: Yeah. I’m
Malcolm Collins: gonna dive right in. Well, it’s such a
Nux Taku: pleasure to meet you guys.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah,
Simone Collins: likewise. It’s really good to meet you, too.
Malcolm Collins: It’s, it’s so huge to be doing something, because we’ve done, like, peers. We’ve done bigger people before, but I’ve never done anyone who I watch as much as you.
Yeah. So,
Simone Collins: like- No, you’re, like, liter- like, literally part of, like, the wallpaper- ... of, of our every... I mean, you know how it is. Like, you, you’re just, you’re always on. So we hear your voice all the time, and it’s, it’s really weird. Wow. It’s one of those things- That’s crazy ... I think we haven’t even thought to do
Malcolm Collins: that.
E- even today you helped me win an argument with my wife. Yeah, it’s true. Because she got big mad- Let’s go ... about a title card that I made today. Yeah. And she’s like, “That implies that Black people, there’s a portion of Black Americans that want [00:58:00] white Americans dead.” And I’m like, “It’s true.” And then you said the same thing in your title, and I was like, “See, Simone?”
Simone Collins: Yeah. I was like, “Well, if Nux says it, okay.” But also, yeah,
Nux Taku: I mean- Listen, I’m not, I’m not an authority here, but what other interpretation would there be to these guys crashing out that Carmelo Anthony’s going to jail? Like-
Malcolm Collins: That-
Simone Collins: Yeah ... is there another explanation? I hadn’t seen that footage, and now I have.
And now I’m very alarmed. I know.
Malcolm Collins: I mean, I, I do, I think that they think that they should be treated differently by the law. I think that that’s, like... W- we’ll get into that later.
Speaker: Yeah, I think he likes it. Oh, he’s still figuring out how to swallow solid foods after he chews them. See? He’s kinda going through it. He doesn’t really know how to swallow food. Oh, it d- oh, okay. Oh, dear. Well, you know.
Speaker 2: He threw up. Oh, boy. There it goes. He threw up. Oh, God.
You think it’s so freaking funny. [00:59:00] You don’t have to clean it up.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Malcolm and Simone Collins break down the growing public anger over glaring double standards in interracial violence, media coverage, and the justice system. They dive deep into the Kamelo Anthony case (the stabbing of Austin Metcalf at a Texas track meet), European migrant crime incidents, fundraising scandals, jury selection disparities, crime statistics, and the disturbing normalization of anti-white violence.
This episode explores why many feel the law is applied unequally, the oppressor/oppressed worldview driving it, immigration realities, and what a realistic path forward looks like — including building a broad, accountable coalition rather than narrow racial politics. A raw, data-heavy discussion on race, crime, culture, and civilization in 2026.
Watch the full Based Camp episode for unfiltered analysis.
Show Notes
The Flash Point Cases
2026 Karmelo Anthony Murder Judgment
* On June 9, 2026, a Texas jury found 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony guilty of murder for fatally stabbing 17-year-old track athlete Austin Metcalf at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas, on April 2, 2025.
* Anthony was subsequently sentenced to 35 years in prison
2025 Dublin case
* A 20-something illegal migrant from believed to be from Africa (with prior deportation orders) allegedly sexually assaulted a 10-year-old Irish girl in state care at a hotel housing asylum seekers
* This triggered riots, vehicle burnings, and clashes
June 2026 Belfast Knife Attack
* On 40-something white Stephen Ogilvy by Hadi Alodid, a Sudanese refugee granted status in 2023
* Hadi Alodid was charged with attempted murder (but there was immediate unrest over immigration)
What people are saying online
Media angles (echoed on social): “Is the far right exploiting the attack by a refugee?” with focus on disorder rather than root causes like vetting. (e.g. FRANCE 24 - Europe posted: “Is the far right exploiting the ‘sickening’ attack by a refugee in Belfast?”
Depa wrote: Kristallnacht in #Belfast begins:
Masked thugs smash windows of houses of black& brown people after Sudanese immigrant tries to kill (Scottish?) man in a brutal knife attack
Houses were also torched, mobs attacked POC in Glasgow after far right influencers called for protests..
iResist wrote: Anti-immigrant far right thugs in the city of Belfast in the UK have torched vehicles and buildings after a Sudanese man was arrested over a knife attack that left one person with serious injuries.
Masked men are hunting immigrants in the city.
April 2026 Belgium Kortrijk gang rape
* Nine migrant minors (from various non-Western backgrounds) gang-raped a 14-year-old Belgian schoolgirl (”loaned out“ among them).
* “The abuse took place during the Easter holidays in April 2024 in the Kabouterbos, a wooded area in Kortrijk. The victim was 14 at the time, while the suspects were aged between 11 and 16” (ReMix News)
* She was lured into the woods by her then-16-year-old boyfriend
* They filmed her rape and posted videos to snapchat
* All were found guilty but received no prison
* Instead, they got probation/community service (30 hours max).
* Their lenient treatment was criticized as emblematic of soft juvenile justice for migrant offenders
What people are saying online
Critics of outrage call it disproportionate or ignoring similar intra-native cases.
Per Al Jazeera, Sikh/Muslim/immigrant advocacy groups are distancing themselves from the perpetrator while documenting rising hate incidents.
December 2025 Henry Nowak Stabbing Case
* 18-year-old White university student Henry Nowak was stabbed to death (multiple times with an 8-inch Sikh ceremonial dagger/kirpan) by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa (Sikh).
* Digwa and his brother falsely claimed to police that Nowak had racially attacked him (grabbing turban, slurs).
* Police initially handcuffed the dying Nowak based on this.
* Digwa was convicted of murder in 2026; the judge called the racism claim a “wicked lie.”
* It sparked major outrage, questions from PM Keir Starmer about how racism accusations influenced police, and reviews of policing. Critics argued initial response prioritized the false hate claim over the victim’s life
What people said online
Hebb Rule is Enough fir AGI/A Creative I - Jayan wrote: “The Sikh man and his family are not walking around looking to stab people. Henry Nowak was a drunk racist abusing the Punjabi and got what he deserved. The police correctly identified the drunk aggressor and just didn’t realise he was stabbed.”
Bakara Amuri wrote:
🚨😳SIKS ARE FIGHTING BACK…. UNPRECEDENTED MOVES🇬🇧
Innocent Sikhs have been targeted, while the elderly and vulnerable are
being urged to stay indoors, following the sentencing of Vickrum Digwa.
Amarjeet Singh, from Hounslow in west London, has launched a website for Sikhs across the country to report incidents of hate crime.
The site has received numerous reports in the past five days, with many respondents believing the abuse they experienced was linked to Digwa’s conviction.
Will you report any anti sikhs “crimes”?
The British Sikh Report 2025 found:
49% of British Sikhs were already worried about rising anti‑Sikh sentiment.
Many reported being mistaken for Muslims or targeted simply for wearing a turban.
according to the report here is the reason why:
“far‑right mobilisation”
Is There Really a Policing Double Standard?
The standard understanding is that there is a double standard, but it’s in favor of whites and to the detriment of non-whites.
Per organizations like The Sentencing Project: Evidence from policing, sentencing, and media coverage shows racial double standards do exist—but they do not take the form of “non‑white offenders being treated more leniently on average.” Instead, the consistent pattern in U.S. research is harsher treatment of Black and other non‑white suspects/defendants, especially when victims are white, and more sympathetic social treatment of white offenders.
A 2021 study of co‑offending partners found that Black offenders were significantly more likely than white co‑offenders to be arrested for the same incident, especially in assault cases. That is, when a Black and a white suspect commit an offense together, police are more likely to formally arrest the Black suspect, indicating differential enforcement rather than equal treatment.
Interracial Crime Realities
One thing people are discussing online is the reality of mixed-race attacks/crimes
First: Most violent crime in the U.S. is intraracial: people tend to victimize members of their own racial group. In 2020, about 69% of violent incidents against white victims and 66% against Black victims involved an offender of the same race or ethnicity. That means “white‑on‑Black” or “Black‑on‑white” crimes are a relatively small subset of overall violence, not the dominant pattern (as reported by the US Department of Justice)
Per a 2024 Department of Justice Report, which provides counts and percentages of violent incidents by the race/Hispanic origin of victims and offenders, based on victims’ perceptions:
* White‑on‑non‑white* (white offenders, non‑white victims):
* White‑on‑black: 57,370
* White‑on‑Hispanic: 334,770
* White‑on‑“other”: 217,140
* Total white‑on‑non‑white ≈ 609,000 incidents.
* Non‑white‑on‑white (non‑white offenders, white victims):
* Black‑on‑white: 536,120
* Hispanic‑on‑white: 271,410
* “Other”‑on‑white: 262,120
* Total non‑white‑on‑white ≈ 1,070,000 incidents.
*Here “non‑white” = black, Hispanic, and “other” race categories.
These tallies exclude incidents where offender race is unknown or mixed‑race groups that the table pushes into “other”; they are best understood as approximate patterns rather than precise totals of “all interracial incidents”.
General Findings:
* The authors highlight that the share of violent incidents with white offenders (47%) is smaller than whites’ share of the population (60%).
* They also note that the share of incidents with black offenders (28%) is more than double blacks’ share of the population (12%).
* Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islander persons are underrepresented as both victims and offenders relative to their population share.
Key interracial/intraracial findings in their terms
From table 13 (incidents by victim and offender race/Hispanic origin):
* White victims experienced about 3.42 million violent incidents in 2024.
* Of these, about 1.71 million incidents involved white offenders (intra‑racial), while about 0.54 million involved black offenders and about 0.27 million involved Hispanic offenders.
* Black victims experienced about 0.77 million violent incidents.
* Of these, about 0.40 million involved black offenders (intra‑racial), vs about 0.06 million with white offenders and about 0.12 million with Hispanic offenders.
* Hispanic victims experienced about 1.16 million violent incidents, with roughly 0.27 million involving Hispanic offenders, and substantial numbers involving white or black offenders.
These joint victim–offender counts allow you to identify which victim–offender race pairings are more common in terms of incident counts but still are not presented as “rates of interracial crime” in the report’s framing.
Key incident counts from Table 13 (2024 NCVS legacy)
All numbers below are counts of violent incidents, based on victims’ perception of offender race/Hispanic origin.
* Total violent incidents involving white victims: 3,421,720.
* White offender: 1,706,750
* Black offender: 536,120
* Hispanic offender: 271,410
* “Other” race offender: 262,120
* Offender race unknown: 645,320
* Total violent incidents involving black victims: 773,420.
* White offender: 57,370
* Black offender: 402,960
* Hispanic offender: 121,880 (flagged “interpret with caution”)
* “Other” race offender: 54,360 (caution)
* Offender race unknown: 136,850
* Total violent incidents involving Hispanic victims: 1,160,980.
* White offender: 334,770
* Black offender: 288,130
* Hispanic offender: 274,230
* “Other” race offender: 36,930 (caution)
* Offender race unknown: 226,920
* Total violent incidents involving “other” (Asian, NHPI, AIAN, multiracial) victims: 719,720.
* White offender: 217,140
* Black offender: 144,420
* Hispanic offender: 128,240 (caution)
* “Other” race offender: 106,310 (caution)
* Offender race unknown: 123,600
Limitations of the report
* The NCVS relies on victim self-report and perceived offender race, so all offender race numbers are based on perception, not official records.
* It does not publish a simple table that directly says “X% of white victims were victimized by non‑white offenders” or “rate of interracial victimization per 1,000 by victim race”; you would need to derive that from the incident table and separate population denominators.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] hello, Simone. Crazy times we live in. It seems like we’re heading right into one of these.
Speaker 2: It seems to be a survival guide of some kind. Survival of what? From the looks of it, a contagion outbreak of the worst kind.
Speaker 4: Oh my God.
Malcolm Collins: But we are right now, and what we’re going to take this episode to go over is a sea change in public opinion around racial relationships, and I think the beginning of a realization that a portion of America and the wider Western world simply did not at all care when white people died. And, and this is kind of shocking to say, but we right now had a situation where basically being a white American was beginning to feel like this
Speaker 10: This is about protecting people, ,
Speaker 9: something’s wrong.
Speaker 10: Look [00:01:00] out! You did what you had to. You’re a hero. That may be true, but I’ll have to live with this the rest of my life, even though I’ll be walking around a free man.
Hey, wait a minute. This kid
Isn’t just white
Is a Mormon with a large Lego company
Speaker 10: Wait, what?
Speaker 9: Guilty.
Malcolm Collins: My God. A- and, and when people are like, oh... Because you see on a lot of the conservative bloggers, and I’m, I’m not gonna rehash all this, have shown you the protesters outside of the Anthony trial.
Speaker 19: What do you want us to do? That’s right. What, what do you want us to do at this point? What? I, I, I’m, I’m lost for word. I don’t know what to do. I got five boys. I don’t know what, I ain’t got nothing to tell them no more.
Speaker 21: play out since then and what we’re watch happening now is because
Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm. Which we’ll go over which was very, very open-and-shut case and really i- [00:02:00] insane.
They ended up raising $600,000 for the case moving into a $900,000 house and then-
Simone Collins: Wait ... the- The family of the attacker?
Malcolm Collins: Yes. Then he had to be, he had to s- s- basically sue the court and say, “I’m, I’m destitute,” and be repor- like supported by a public defendant. Yeah.
Simone Collins: Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. So wh- Oh, okay.
The attacker’s family raised a ton of money but said they were destitute?
Malcolm Collins: Y- basically, they raised a ton of money. Uh-huh. They spent all of the money on personal things- Oh ... and then they said they didn’t have- And then they couldn’t afford- ... enough money to get like a defender. Oh. And they have personally reported to the media, “Oh, we didn’t do that.”
And so like Snopes will say like, “Oh, this isn’t true,” but it’s one of those things where Snopes is so ideologically captured at this point, if you just... Then why is he [00:03:00] using a public defendant if he raised $600,000? Why do they have a new house? W- like, a- and why are, do they admit they have a new house in their own social media postings?
There, there, there was a, a incorrect accusation at one point that they had done this, which is the funny thing, is basically the right accused them of doing this before they actually did it. Oh, and they
Simone Collins: were like, “That’s a great idea.”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but they’re like, “Yeah, we can prove we haven’t withdrawn the money yet.”
And then like literally just weeks later, “Now we withdrew the money and bought a new house.” Oh,
Simone Collins: huh.
Malcolm Collins: But anyway, so, we have people like Cardi B saying I don’t know if you saw... Like, so it’s not just the crazy people outside of this place, like, a- and, and saying that he got a new car by the way.
Simone Collins: Oh, no.
Malcolm Collins: Where
Simone Collins: is- Is, so is this his brother? Because just to be, to be clear, I know, and most people have heard about this, but what happened was in December of 2025, a, an 18-year-old white university student named Henry Noak was stabbed to death multiple times with an [00:04:00] eight-inch Sikh ceremonial dagger.
So this was also like specifically a- What are we
Malcolm Collins: talking about? That’s, that’s not what we’re talking about right now. We’re talking about the Anthony- Wait,
Simone Collins: which case are you talking about?
Malcolm Collins: The Anthony case.
Simone Collins: Okay, sorry. The- There are so many. Who is, who is, where-
what, who, Anth-
Malcolm Collins: sorry. I- We’re talking about the Anthony case, the Black guy who stabbed a white track star to death.
Simone Collins: Oh, God. I didn’t even come across that. I have all these other cases that I looked at. This is becoming way too much of a pattern Wait, do
Malcolm Collins: you even, there are so many random killings of white people
Simone Collins: Yeah, no.
So there’s the 2025 Dublin case where a, a 20-something illegal immigrant believed to be from Africa allegedly assaulted a 10-year-old Irish girl, and then that triggered a bunch of riots. And then there’s a, the June 2026 Belfast knife attack
Malcolm Collins: where
Simone Collins: a 40, a 40-something white, Stephen O’Gifley, and, and was, was stabbed by a Sudanese refugee who was granted status in 2023, and then he was charged with attempted murder.
But after, immediately [00:05:00] after that stabbing took place, obviously there was a lot of unrest over immigration. And then there was the April 2026 Belgian case of group unplanned surprise sex in a forest. H- I don’t know how else to put this. Basically nine migrant minors from various non-Western backgrounds gang- the prize sex attacked a 14-year-old Belgian schoolgirl who they filmed a- attacking in a forest after she was lured there by her 16-year-old boyfriend.
And then posted it on Snapchat. And they were, they were found guilty, but they didn’t receive any prison sentences. They, they got 30 hours max of community service.
Malcolm Collins: No prison sentences?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Just, you know, clean the f- clean the highway for 30 hours and we’re good. We’re-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. You’re not even finding the ones that I’m finding.
Like, did you- Yeah.
Simone Collins: Then, then there’s the, the, the Henry Nowek case, which, which I’ve been hearing about the most on social media-
Malcolm Collins: That’s the most famous- With the, this huge- But we’ll go over that later ‘cause everyone’s aware of the [00:06:00] details of it ...
Simone Collins: dagger. And then there’s w- well, wait, so who, who’s this tracker?
Wait,
Malcolm Collins: hold
Simone Collins: on. I’ve never even heard of
Malcolm Collins: this- You didn’t even find the Sudanese guy who just yesterday attacked- No ... a mentally disabled man in Ireland?
Simone Collins: No, and I look at the headlines every single morning. I look at X, I look at Drudge, I look at New York Times- Or
Malcolm Collins: the four- I look at Twitchy ... Iraqi guys who did a drive-by, killed a 14-year-old girl, in I wanna say Germany.
No. They then moved her body off the road. The police lied to the girl’s mom, saying that it was a German who did it.
Simone Collins: And- Oh, for the love ...
Malcolm Collins: and then when the mom basically found out and did an investigation, she found out that none of the men even served any jail time. They, they said, “Oh, it’s a, it’s a regular hit and run,” even though they knew that they had moved her body off the road.
Oh, for the- Right? Like, they, they are actively covering this up.
Simone Collins: Yeah, not e- not even a hit and run, a hit and hide.
Malcolm Collins: My God. So what I’m talking about, this is happening so frequently in our society now, like
Simone Collins: we, we even- Like, the, the news cycle can’t even keep up with it. It’s like, I don’t know.” No, news cycle can’t keep up with it.
It’s, it’s, now, now it’s like that South Park episode on school shootings of like, “Wait, you [00:07:00] got an F on your math test?”
Speaker 34: Stanley, well, do you want to tell your father about what happened at school today?
Speaker 35: I flunked my math quiz.
Speaker 34: No, the other thing.
Speaker 36: What other thing?
Speaker 35: Oh, the school shooting? Yes, the school shooting! Oh yeah, some kids shot up the school.
Speaker 36: Was it you?
Speaker 35: No.
Speaker 36: Did you get shot?
Speaker 35: No.
Speaker 36: Oh. Well, what’s this about failing a math quiz?
Malcolm Collins: Well, and the expectation that there will be no repercussions if you kill a white person- Mm ... has gotten so extreme that you will even have not just these crazies, like, outside a courtroom, but Cardi B tweeted, “Wow, just wow.
Disgusting. This is not justice. This is trying to make an example.”
, So we’ll go over the case of, of the Anthony case, which a lot of people are talking about now, and you’ll get to hear about for the first time, Simone.
Simone Collins: Yes, tell me about this track star?
Malcolm Collins: No, the core thing that everybody’s whining about with the Anthony case, like the other side, is they [00:08:00] go, “There were no Black jurors.”
Here’s the problem. Only three Black people showed up for jury selection in this case. Oh, dear. That we are aware of.
Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s-
Malcolm Collins: Black people, it turns out, show up for jury selection at an extremely low rate. They show
Simone Collins: up- Oh, like even disproportionate to their share of the US population?
Malcolm Collins: Yes. So 44% of the time, Black people are non-responsive to jury summons.
While this is a-
Simone Collins: Well, I think also they dis- disproportionately may serve in jobs that are, like, hourly, and it’s really hard to get time off. You lose shifts, you lose your job. Like- It
Malcolm Collins: could be. I mean, it, it could also be less a sense of civic duty. Like, we don’t know, right? But they, they don’t show up for jury nearly as much as...
What, whites show up, they only have a no-show rate of 12%. Okay Extremely low.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: And the three Blacks that did show up were dismissed for normal reasons, which is they were educators. And in cases involving minors, it is normal to dismiss educators. That’s just a normal part- Why is that? What?
Simone Collins: Why would that [00:09:00] be?
Malcolm Collins: Because they’re seen as being overly sympathetic to minors.
Simone Collins: Oh, I thought they’d be overly prejudicial. It’s like, “I’m fed up with these kids. Put them in jail.” Like, minors are now This is my chance to fight back. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: okay. Well, and another thing I wanna talk about that we’ll get to in the end here is all this sort of performative racism we’re seeing from the conservative side, where it’s, like, obvious they’re not real racists.
It’s like, on our channel, us pretending to be racist, and I’m gonna do that whitest kids you know skit- Oh, God. Not again ...
Speaker 12: all right. Guess I’m just gonna have to come out and say it. Now, don’t be mad, but I’m a little bit of a racist.
Speaker 11: Oh, really? You’re a racist?
Speaker 12: Yep.
Speaker 11: No, you’re not.
Speaker 12: What?
Speaker 11: No, you’re not.
Speaker 12: I am. I’m racist every day, all the time.
Speaker 11: Well, call me the N-word.
Speaker 12: What? Why?
Speaker 11: Call me the N-word.[00:10:00]
Speaker 12: I, I would. I love slaves.
Speaker 11: You love slaves? -
Speaker 12: ery I love slavery.
Speaker 11: And what is it exactly that you love about slavery?
Speaker 12: I, I think it’s awesome that you people... Not you people. Yes, you people have to work for free all the time.
Simone Collins: Which I forget on cue again. Oh, yay.
Malcolm Collins: But let’s go over the, It, it, oh, I’ll, I’ll, I’ll quickly go over the, the money and the fundraising. So they raised 634, 4K. What it appears happened is first they were accused of buying luxury things with it before they actually withdrew it.
Then they withdrew it, hired a lawyer, right? Who was a real lawyer who they did use for a period. But then after that period was over, and it seems that, like, through most of the middle of the trial, while they were able to retain him, they don’t [00:11:00] appear to be able to have kept him on board throughout the entire trial as the main lawyer.
This is Mike Howard. And then they had a state defendant. So it is, it is, there’s no way that could happen other than spending the money. Because they would need to prove to the courts that they don’t have enough money to continue to hire a lawyer. Oh,
Simone Collins: that’s true. Yeah. That they just don’t... Right?
Yeah, so I believe- Or I, I think, I think, can’t anyone request a, a public defendant? Let me quickly check that, ‘cause it could just be even not based on
Malcolm Collins: financial- Yeah, they need to prove something called, Resisting public despite the fundrai- in indigent status and indigent status means... I mean, it’s very similar to the Black Lives Matter scam where they, they bought mansions and stuff like that with the money that was meant for Black Lives Matter and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
It, it, it, it, it designates an individual as impoverished
Simone Collins: but verify. We’re, we’re, we’re peer reviewing this. You ask Grok, I’m asking Perplexity. Like, as Mingold does. In the US, you only get a court-appointed public [00:12:00] defender if, one, you are facing a charge that can lead to jail or prison. Oh, that’s this person. Or two, the court finds you cannot afford to hire your own lawyer.
You are indigent under the jurisdiction’s rules. So no, this, this person was facing a charge that could lead to jail or prison. Presumably then they could choose to have a public defender. Well,
Malcolm Collins: th- whatever. They claimed were indigent. They claim to be impoverished. That’s th- th- they- They
Simone Collins: really, like, that’s, that’s, that is attested.
It is, it is- That
Malcolm Collins: is what’s attested by them, is they don’t have any money left. And I get really annoyed that even Snopes now is, like, going to bat for them when, like, the fact, why would you hire a court-appointed attorney if you still had the money? And they had the money at one point. So where did
Simone Collins: the money go?
That is true. That is true. Regardless of what they’re saying, it- if they’re choosing to not spend this money... I mean, I, I, if I’m really trying to steel man this, maybe they had a, a falling out or they lost faith in the lawyer and were like, “Look, I just, we have to keep going. There’s an- another hearing. We can’t miss it.
We don’t have time to [00:13:00] find another lawyer. You know, no one’s willing to work with us. We gotta use a d- public defendant.”
Malcolm Collins: No, they could have hired another lawyer. They had plenty of time. They didn’t have the money. Oh.
Simone Collins: Wow.
Malcolm Collins: S- anyway, to the points of the case, and, and, and, and this is where-
Simone Collins: Here’s, here’s another thing, though.
And ‘cause I was th- when I thought you were describing the Sikh family, but it could just be a case of a family cutting their losses. Like, “Look, I know that my kid- We- we’re just gonna write this kid off? The best thing we can do is, like, raise money for the rest of our family and do the best we can
Malcolm Collins: and- Well, and the family’s raising money again now after the conviction, by the way.
So they’re like, “Oh, the great way to raise a bunch of money.”
Simone Collins: Look, you know, if you have a fail son, and your fail son’s gonna get locked away for life-
Malcolm Collins: That’s generational wealth right there.
Simone Collins: I mean, the reparations. It’s... I don’t know. Like, maybe there’s some psychology to it all.
Malcolm Collins: Anyway, to continue on April 2nd, 2025, at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas during a rainstorm, 17-year-old Kamiller [00:14:00] Anthony from Centennial High sought shelter under the tent of Memorial High School’s team.
Austin Metcalf, 17, and others told Anthony to leave. It was their team’s tent. Words were exchanged. Anthony reportedly said something like, “Touch me and see what happens,” while reaching into his bag.
Simone Collins: Oh, boy.
Malcolm Collins: Metcalf pushed or grabbed Anthony to remove him, so he intentionally tried to physically try to remove him.
And note it’s been attested that they asked him to leave something like 20 or 30 times-
Simone Collins: Oh ...
Malcolm Collins: beforehand, and it w- he clearly wasn’t supposed to be there. It was not his tent.
Simone Collins: Okay ...
Malcolm Collins: and while they, note, they didn’t hit, they didn’t beat him, they, they merely tried to- They just tried
Simone Collins: to, like, pick him up and-
Malcolm Collins: to physically remove
Simone Collins: him,
Malcolm Collins: yes, from their property, right? Mm. A- Anthony pulls out a folding knife and stabbed Metcalf in the chest, then fled. Metcalf died from the wound. But note, note, Anthony did say, “Is he okay?” at some point after fleeing. So- Oh ... he, he’s capable of experiencing s- s- remorse that something may happen to him?
Like, I [00:15:00] can’t even... I cannot believe- Mm ... like, the one Black lady who’s like, “He, he said that.
Well, you don’t know that he’s not just interested in his own...” Like, they, they... It shows that she thinks that if you are Black and you kill a white person and you express remorse- You feel bad
Simone Collins: about it. ...
Malcolm Collins: That you shouldn’t be punished Which is astonishing.
It w- the court case was so bad and biased that there was apparently a moment when the jury gasped- Ooh ... because the person defending the guy tried to suggest that the guy stabbed himself accidentally while pushing him out of the tent.
Simone Collins: Oh, that, that the victim stabbed him- Yeah. The public defender tried to argue that?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I, I mean, I love that, like, the courtroom actually gasped upon hearing this.
Simone Collins: Mm.
Malcolm Collins: Now, as to why everybody considers this such an open-and-shut case for self-defense law, which is what they tried to say, which is the wildest thing ever. You can’t go onto somebody else’s property and then claim self-defense when they’ve repeatedly [00:16:00] asked you to leave.
Simone Collins: Oh, isn’t that kinda how states that don’t have stand-your-ground... A- actually, isn’t that even kinda how stand-your-ground rules-
Malcolm Collins: This, this was a stand-your-ground state.
Simone Collins: Oh, okay.
Malcolm Collins: So for a stand-your-ground state, a reasonable belief of imminent unlawful force or deadly harm, which obviously wasn’t the case here.
Yeah. The response must be proportional and involve provocation by defender. Obviously the court clearly- So they
Simone Collins: should each be trying to pick each other up here.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah, okay.
Malcolm Collins: No duty to retreat from some situations, but you can’t escalate or bring a weapon into a minor dispute. Again, like, he fails at literally every level of what you need for a stand-your-ground law to, to work.
Anthony , had the knife ready and issued a threat. Like, he basically brought a knife and issued a threat, right? Like, you can’t do that with stand your ground. Witnesses said he reached into his bag and warned, “Touch me and see what happens,” before physical contact.
This looks like premeditated escalation rather than pure reaction. He didn’t just happen to have the pocketknife with him. A pole is not a deadly threat. And we have multiple consistent with [00:17:00] witnesses.
So to go over some other cases that have looked like this where we sort of see the opposite reaction of this you know, instead of, like, the person of color automatically you know, having to face any repercussions that I think created the assumption of no repercussions.
You have Tamar, 14, from Marken, this is near Amsterdam, oh, so it was in Germany left home at night after an argument with her parents about going to bed. She was walking along a dark road. She was struck by a gray Mazda car, but her body was found dragged to the side of the road just, like, dragged into a ditch after murdered, a 14-year-old kid.
The car contained four Iraqi men one of whom was the driver. And they were seeking asylum status. In Germany with German plates. Police initially told the m- mother of the, of, of, of the girl that it was a German driver, even though they knew that it wasn’t. When asked why they had deliberately lied to the parents of a dead and grieving girl, they said, “Oh, it was we didn’t want the Wilders effect.”
That is a politician, Geert [00:18:00] Wilders. That’s like saying we don’t want to boost Trump or MAGA, like a mainstream political movement. It’s not even, like, racism. We are afraid of it helping a mainstream politician in the Netherlands, and they just never got any repercussions for doing this. You know what the Iraqis had to pay?
A single 1,500 pound euro fine now-
Simone Collins: That, that can’t be in, in like concurrence with law in Germany, right? Like, that’s not what happens. That’s not what’s supposed to happen with males. Well, it’s
Malcolm Collins: not what happens to Germans, but... And this is what I’m talking about, where it’s actually gotten to the point where the law is just being applied completely separately.
If you see our episode in the... I mean, and, and especially when you look at all of this and then you look at, at instances where the law is, you know, protecting rich white people. Oh, oh, they’re fine. Like, look at the bricks and minifigs situation, right? You know? But when you look at the, the way that it’s being applied to like average people.
When we had the case of you know, the guy trying to defend someone [00:19:00] on the subway and ends up killing the guy, right? And everyone was just like, “How could you do that? How could you defend yourself? You’re just supposed to lie down and take it.” And what I want to sort of go through in this episode is just sort of normalize how far we’ve come as a society.
That you are just supposed to let yourself be stabbed at this point. And th- this is what some communities have normalized to. And it’s leading to really bad action in mass. You know, we have instances, like during the Black Lives Matter protests, that we now know that people were burned alive in that protest, right?
You know, bodies have been found in, in some of the stories. I, I know at least one, I think more than one.
Speaker 23: Yeah, , a man, , Oscar Lee Stewart, had his store looted and was locked inside, and it was deliberately lit on fire, and he was burned alive. , And so i-if, if you didn’t hear about this, this, this is huge. 19 to 25 people were killed in the riots. N- nobody talks about it. Nobody cares about it. It’s insane
Malcolm Collins: You know, they, they... we... And this wasn’t widely report- like, this wasn’t something that [00:20:00] the progressive media covered, right? Like we- Yeah,
Simone Collins: this is my first time hearing about that. That’s terrifying.
Malcolm Collins: We have allowed society to enter a degree of just pure degeneracy that cannot be allowed to stand. And in Europe, there’s not even really parties attempting to fight this in a big way. Like, w- when you talk about the mainstream, like the Wilder party or Reform in the UK or the AFD, these keep being called fringe movements.
They frame centrist rightism, like the AFD run by a lesbian in an interracial marriage with kids you know, as a, a, a far-right party is, is, is comical. They, they’re like, “Well, they’re far right because they want to get rid of immigrants.” And it’s like, how could you not want to get rid of immigrants if this is the case?
If they’re making up... In some of these countries, I’ll, I’ll read after this, but I think it’s like 80% of rapes in some of these countries, right?
Speaker 24: A Lund University 21-year study showed that of grape convictions, only 37% had Swedish parents. If you look [00:21:00] at a country like Germany, despite being only 10% of the population, immigrants account for 40% of SAs. And we see this all over the place throughout Europe. It’s just horrible.
Malcolm Collins: You know, and we do need to, in the United States, even with the Native American Black population you know, we do need to get more realistic in how we’re having these conversations.
They make up a rate of homicides that 6x their population, right? They-
Simone Collins: Yeah, so if you look... Like, this is something people are discussing a lot in this discourse. Like, especially for this one 2024 Department of Justice report that gives counts on percentages of violent incidents by the race- Of origin of victims and offenders based on, based on victims’ perceptions, so that’s a caveat there.
But it reports 57,370 white-on-black incidents, but then 536,120 black-on-white incidents. [00:22:00] That is-
Malcolm Collins: And did you see the rates? The rate stats were almost comical when they came out. Mm-hmm. Where it showed that there wasn’t, in the year of recording, a single instance of white-on-black rape in the United States during that year.
This was the National Crime Victimization Survey, a mainstream nonpartisan crime survey
Malcolm Collins: I’m gonna find those statistics to read them, because it’s just, it, that’s where it just gets comical, right? Like, oh, so this is really a unidirectional violence that we’re dealing with here.
Simone Collins: But I also, I, rather than, I, I wanna make sure that we don’t just straw man the other side while you’re looking at those stats.
Malcolm Collins: Well, no, hold on. If you look at- So- This is, this is from Penn, an Ivy League university in the United States. There was also a Harvard study that showed this, but I’ll just go into the Penn one. Mm-hmm. Regardless of socioeconomic status, Black communities face higher gun homicides. Well, and it
Simone Collins: says- Yeah.
And to be clear, like 60, in the 60s for both whites and Blacks and, and other groups, 60%-ish, or, like between 60% and 70% are, of crimes are race-on-race. Like white-on-white, Black-on-Black. Like the crimes are, are typically [00:23:00] concentrated in your own group.
Malcolm Collins: Right. But the point I’m making here is that these are higher rates even when you’re...
So you can’t be like, “Oh, it’s because of historic discrimination,” or something like that. It, it is- No ... because of... And, and why not? If, if you are a Black person and you’re growing up, like, and you see everyone in your community being like, “Of course a kid shouldn’t go to jail for stabbing a kid when he was asked to be re- like multiple times to be removed from the property and they had to eventually physically remove him.
That’s a totally normal thing for someone of our community to do.” When they act with shock at this they, they then for young Black kids, they grow up and they think, “This is a type of thing I do. This is a type of thing that’s normal for me to do.”
Speaker 15: Webster defines a
Speaker 15: moment as a moment when ignorance overwhelms the mind of an otherwise logical
Speaker 15: male.
Speaker 14: What did you say, b***h ?
Speaker 14: Hey, squeeze it, .
Speaker 15: Causing him to act in an illogical, [00:24:00] self-destructive manner, i.e.,
like a .
Speaker 15: But they all end up bad. If they had their own category,
Speaker 15: moments would be the third leading killer of Black men behind pork chops and FEMA. It’s a fact.
Every
Speaker 15: moment begins with a .
Speaker 15: Without that key element, all you’re left with is peace and quiet
Malcolm Collins: And it’s, it’s true within the immigrant community, it’s true within these, these Sikh communities with these Muslim communities that are immigrating into these countries.
When they see these communities have these protests about like, “We should be able to do this,” which we’ve actually seen counter-protests. When people have gone out there to protest, like the, the guy the, we’ll talk about this case now. The white kid who was stabbed and then the, the Sikh kid’s family tried to hide the wea- the weapon.
His mom hid the wea- weapon. His, his brothers were complicit in this. The police believed him even though he told them multiple times, “I, I’ve been stabbed, I’m dying.” And we now see these anti-discrimination procedures that they have to go through, [00:25:00] and what the anti-discrimination procedures basically say is you need to always presume the white person is at fault.
Well, it
Simone Collins: would explain why what happened happened. I, I don’t know if you’ve seen footage from that particular incident, but like Yeah, it, it, it does kind of feel like they’re acting on procedure of like... That, plus also it genuinely seemed like they didn’t believe the white kid. Like, they were like, “Yeah, sure you have been.”
Like, “I don’t see anything.” Like, whining.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, well, I mean, police in the UK are awful, generally speaking. Like my- I haven’t
Simone Collins: had any encounters with them, so I don’t know.
Malcolm Collins: My experience is they’re like, well this is what happens when you take away their guns and you put them in the far left environment of the UK, is they begin to act like ultra Karens.
Simone Collins: Well, I wouldn’t wanna be a police officer in the UK. I mean, to be a police officer without a gun, I’d be terrified. Yeah. But what, it, it is, like that is, I think in terms of the, the social media posts that were made online that I’ve seen, the worst are around that case. Like, this one guy on X posted, “The Sikh man and his family are not walking around looking to [00:26:00] stab people.
Henry Nowak was a drunk racist abusing the Punjabi and got what he deserved. The police correctly identified the drunk aggressor and just didn’t realize he was stabbed.” Like, that is not
Malcolm Collins: good. This, again, what I’m saying here is they genuinely... We need to move, because I think it can sound like people are being hyperbolic.
And I, and I wanna go through some articles where, where people talk about, like, the, they’re so concerned about the rise in reportings of these crimes. And like, The Guardian of course has a piece, panicked that these crimes are being reported at higher rates now. And we need to go from the they want you dead isn’t hyperbolic.
It’s what they when, every time they cheer when they say... Because historically this is how it started. It’s like, oh, the number of you know, whites will no longer be a majority in the country. White populations are going down. And you would see at leftist rallies they would cheer. This really happened, right?
We would see them cheer. Eh, that means, [00:27:00] oh, this is exciting for us. Like, we are getting rid of this population. H- A, a generation raised singing that and normalizing for that is of course not going to mind as much when they see white people being killed, and is going to react absolutely in panic when they see white people defending themselves, which is what we repeatedly see.
Of a continuous post here.
Simone Collins: So an- another response that’s really common with, like, this specific Si- Sikh stabbing incident is, “Sikhs are fighting back. Unprecedented moves.” This is from Baakara Amri. “Innocent Sikhs have been targeted while the elderly and vulnerable are being urged to stay indoors following the sentencing of Bikram Dhingra.
Amrit Singh from Hounslow and Mas- “west London has launched a website for Sikhs across the country to report incidents of hate crime. The site has received numerous reports in the past five days, with many respondents believing the abuse they experienced was linked to Dhingra’s conviction.
‘Will you report any anti-Sikhs crimes?’ The British Sikhs 2025 [00:28:00] report found 40 thou- 49% of British Sikhs were already worried about rising anti-Sikh sentiment. Many reported being mistaken for Muslims or targeted simply for wearing a turban, according to the report. Here is the reason why. Far-right mobilization.”
So what, what... And this is a really common pattern across most of these incidents, which is instead of respond to the actual crime or to condemn the actual aggressors- Mm-hmm. Yeah ... in these crimes, they’re like, “You know what? This is just the right trying to use this to radicalize people.” And instead of having a real conversation about what’s going on of, like, this is not acceptable.
We have to punish these people. They cannot be lenient punishments. We need to reconsider deportations. We need to reconsider immigration. Instead it’s like, “No, no, no. You’re just, you’re just hating on people.” And that, I think, is where I feel like the conversation is just people screaming across the bow to each other, is that there has, from what I can tell, actually been a policing double [00:29:00] standard in favor of white populations in majority white countries, and to the disfavor of non-whites.
Like per organizations like The Sentencing Project, evidence from policing and sentencing and media coverage shows a true racial double standards, at least historically, have existed. They just happen to be, you know, a- against, you know, the favor of-
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, we can, we can... So one-
Simone Collins: I think what’s happening, though, what I’m trying to say- We know that this happened-
is maybe right now people are over-correcting for hysteric- sorry, historical favoritism toward white people, historical bias, and they’re going too far. And now what needs to happen is a market correction. But one side, the progressives, people on the left, are just so, like, stuck in the there is discrimination.
There is discrimination that they can’t see that maybe they’ve over-corrected at this point. And then on the right, they’re just so angry that the left isn’t even listening to them that they’re getting more and more extreme and shouting louder and louder.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and that, the entire point I’m making is I think that that is the [00:30:00] wrong takeaway from all of this.
Simone Collins: Really? Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Yes. Yes. I think that for a long time that has been my position. My position has been this is just marginal over-correction. But when I look at the posts and the people, when I look at how incensed they were that Anthony was charged, when I look at them saying, “Oh, it’s good that the Sikh killed this kid in the street and that the police let him die,” what I’m seeing, when you see mainstream figures, not just online crazies, like Cardi B saying that this is disgusting, that, you know, justice was carried out, what we are seeing here is a m- a large part of the left, and especially these minority communities, genuinely believe that The law should not apply to their communities.
They, they, they, their communities should be allowed to kill this other group with impunity because this other group is so beneath them, so beneath in, in the long for- This is why we [00:31:00] saw, and I think we should have assumed this, when we saw the people having the parties for the October 11th attacks, you know, before the IDF did anything in response or anything like that, on college campuses around the United States they really believe, and watch our video on Zoran Mandani where we break the psychology and politics of this that the world exists in two classes: the oppressor and the oppressed.
And anyone who’s in oppressed class, even if they functionally have societal power which they do today if they’re in the oppressed class, they can do anything they want to the oppressor, and it is never immoral. So when they go and, you know, Hamas is dragging girls away from a peace protest, right, which was what it was, the big concert that they had, and gang raping them and murdering them in horrific ways, this isn’t bad because girl was of oppressor class, the other side was of the oppressed class.
And I think that this is hidden from a lot of, a lot of people under the mindset that you are going right now, which is just [00:32:00] like, “Oh, we over-corrected.” This isn’t over-corrected. This is cheering when people are brutally graped or murdered and things alike, like the police actively lying to a girl’s parents about the ethnicity of who just killed a 14-year-old girl.
That isn’t like,
Simone Collins: Yeah, no, that, that is, that is something that’s atrocious That’s
Malcolm Collins: like the height of like Jim Crow South and stuff like that when I went through-
Simone Collins: Yeah, oh, and also correction, I completely mixed up in my head Nicki Minaj and Cardi B. Cardi B is very anti-Trump. Nicki Minaj is the person who, like, showed up s- with some support for Trump, and people on the left defenestrated her for that, of course.
So it’s Nicki Minaj who’s being boycotted.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, when you have something like a teenage girl being gang graped in the woods and, and, and no one is sent to jail for this.
Simone Collins: I mean, to be fair, they were like age 11 to 16, so it might just be about like minor offenses, but I think there are plenty of cases- That’s not a
Octavian Collins: minor offense.
Simone Collins: No, no, no, but [00:33:00] they are minors, and they are offe- They murdered a girl. They are a threat. I n- Malcolm, they are minors. They are below the age of 18. Yeah, I
Malcolm Collins: know. They should still go to jail. They’re clearly a threat to their community.
Simone Collins: Right. I mean, there are certainly exceptions in which minors are tried as adults.
I just don’t know
Malcolm Collins: You don’t need to be tried as adult. There’s prisons for minors. What are you talking about?
Simone Collins: Oh, well, I, I mean, who knows how it works in other countries. I, I mean-
Malcolm Collins: No, you can go to jail as a minor. There,
Simone Collins: there’s entire prison- They’re extremely
Malcolm Collins: lenient in many European countries And you don’t get to just murder or grape someone because you’re a minor.
And the mindset it shows to not only video... This is what I’m talking about when I say
Simone Collins: they think about- No, it’s so sick, and it’s, it’s truly sick. It’s, it’s, it’s horrific. It, yeah ... to video it,
Malcolm Collins: put it on Snapchat. To do that shows you don’t believe you’re going to be punished.
Simone Collins: Yeah, they, they, they expected some level of impunity, and they got it.
And- I mean, like, they weren’t wrong to do that ... and then they got it. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: This is the thing that’s changing. When you’re like, “It’s a m- it’s a minor change”- Yeah,
Simone Collins: I guess if we live in a society in which young [00:34:00] teens believe that they can do such a thing, post it to Snapchat, and, and not be that at high risk and actually get caught, and then only get 30 hours community service shows how bad it is, I guess.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And I think that w- I think the wrong takeaway from this, right? Which I think some of the right is going to have, is that this means that we need to exclude all members of these communities from our faction. And that, that is a huge mistake, because you don’t have enough white people to win elections.
The, in, in, in fact, a lot of this mindset, while it is prevalent in some of these minority communities, is coming downstream of, of white women. Okay? You don’t have the votes to win if you try to take a racialist perspective, like, say, a Nick Fuentes does. If you want to win, you need to get on our team- P- people who want their group to behave respectably and want their [00:35:00] group to be held accountable.
That, that, once you get that, then, then it works. It’s okay. Bring them over, right? But that’s the world we need to move to if, if we’re gonna win, realistically. And then with everyone else, I think we need to get dramatically harsher. And I think that we are seeing a model of the way that the West or the United States at least, should reorient the way it sees people who...
And, and, and groups that are acting bad. I think Israel is sort of modeling the direction we need to go. And I think that that’s one reason why they make such a natural and strong ally right now, is some people are like, “Well, you know, Jews see themselves as a distinct group,” and yes, they have, you know...
I can go to Israel and have a great life. Like I’ve, I’ve, I’ve been to Israel before. It’s a really nice place. You don’t face... At, at least when I was there, I never got any sense of any discrimination. It’s not that there aren’t parts of Israel you can’t go where you will face discrimination but that’s true of anywhere, right?
You know, there are white communities where you’ll face discrimination in the United States. There’s Black [00:36:00] communities where you’ll face discrimination in the United States. But the, the overall, they’ve created a multi-ethnic society in Israel and a multicultural society. But it is still a society where there is a, a ethnic identity and cultural identity and religious identity sort of recognized.
And I think that that is the direction that we can go in the United States that will be sane. And we actually see, like a lot of people can think, “Oh, you’re not gonna peel off, you know, Black voters.” We actually have a significant Black fan base, first of all, for people who are unaware of that. And in addition to that when the left tries to do all these crazy things like de- go, defund the police and stuff like this, on average Black people, when I talk about like wh- whites don’t have enough money not enough votes to win on their own on average, Black voters were more anti-defund the police than the average white voter.
Note here, I’m not talking about like Republican white voters. I’m talking about the average white voter. That means you can peel off people easier [00:37:00] from the Black side than the white side on this particular issue. And the a- answer is, is because when you recognize, oh, this community is more violent, because as Simone said, they are disproportionately the subject of that violence And you say, “Okay, this means we need to act in a different way when engaging with this community,” the, the, the, the people who benefit from that the most are the people from that community.
That’s why Blacks didn’t want the police defunded, right? Like, a- and if you, if you look at... Well, I mean, you’ve, you’ve obviously got different portions of these communities, but the Blacks who still have healthy families and are having lots of kids are, from what I’ve seen, universally in this conservative camp.
It is, a- a- and note, there are a lot of, you know, raised without dad stuff in the Black community. The, the rate is astonishingly high. But I don’t think that that is going to continue to be a problem going [00:38:00] forwards, because we’ve seen the Black fertility rate drop below the white fertility rate in the United States.
If you’re not aware of that, that, that happened. Not controlling for income, just raw numbers dropped below the white fertility rate. I, I remember when I mentioned that on the stream, people were, like, confused. They thought it was like... Watch our episode on it. Like, we go over all the data. Like, like, if you look at native-born Blacks, they have a desperately low fertility rate in the United States.
Most of the Black fertility rate is pumped up by immigrants. Native Blacks mainly have a fertility rate of, like, 1.3 at this point. And so, what, what basically what I’m saying is this is a community we can eventually get on team.
Speaker 22: Reverend Jordan Wells. I’m a Black man, proud conservative, and a follower of Jesus Christ. When I see protesters outside the Collin County Courthouse chanting, “F**k white lives,” after Karmelo Anthony’s sentencing for murdering Austin Metcalf, my soul grieves. This isn’t justice. This isn’t community. This is a demonic hatred, plain and simple.
All lives are made in the image of God, every single one, Black, white, brown, doesn’t matter. Celebrating the loss... This is, this is [00:39:00] true. Celebrating the loss of any innocent life or cheering on evil because of skin color is straight from the pit of hell. And here’s the truth they don’t want to say out loud.
When Black conservatives, Christians, or truth tellers like me call this out, we get labeled as traitors, Uncle Toms, or betrayers of the community. It’s true. Let them talk. I’d rather be disliked by some in my own community than stand before a holy God and be found guilty of excusing evil, hating my neighbor, or twisting justice for racial points.
My allegiance is to Christ first, not color, not tribe, not political pressure. Woe to those who call evil g- good and good evil, Isaiah 5:20. I ch- I choose truth over tribe, light over darkness, God over man. Who else is tired of the hate? Drop a prayer hands if you stand for real justice, not skin color
Malcolm Collins: You know, reacting with hostility to everyone in the community.
But when it comes to the people who are doing things like protesting the Anthony ver- verdict or stuff like that, you know, the people [00:40:00] who we see, you know, the Cardi B’s and stuff like that, the level of anonymity we need to have to these people should be as if, you know, th- like, like they have genocidal intentions.
The people who cheer when the white population is falling, they’re doing that because they want to get rid of this population. In every other context we call that genocide, and they have violent genocidal intentions. And that’s the way we need to reframe how we see who we are up against. We need to be the side of true and genuine diverse groups working together to win and preserve civilization against the racist spastics.
And the left has become the team of racists. I mean, you’ve got Nick Fuentes on the left now saying he’s a moderate Democrat, voting leftists since forever. You’ve got the Islamists there. You’ve got the, the the gay extremists there. Watching the Islamists and the gays fight over pride was hilarious.
But the point being is every one of the mainstream racist factions, like David Duke went to the left, right? Like the, the, the head of the KKK [00:41:00] went to the left, right? Every one of the major racist factions in the United States has naturally drifted to the left because the left has become a coalition of supremacist groups that are simply living in denial about the fact that they’re not at the top of that particular coalition, or that think that once they knock society down, their side will rise from the ashes.
And th- this is what we’re seeing. Like, obviously the gays know that the Islamists want them, you know... I think it’s, what? 35% of American Muslims, and these are the ones who are having the majority of kids in Muslim communities, want Sharia law. Like, that’s literally want them dead. That’s not like a, a figurative thing or something like that.
But they, they are aware of this. And same, like Nick Fuentes is aware of this as well, right? Like David Duke’s aware of this as well. But they just think that, oh, well, once they knock things down, once they, they, they don’t wanna be in a faction that allows Indians in. They don’t wanna be in a faction that allows Jews in when they’re willing to play ball, right?
But we need those groups to win, right? D- even [00:42:00] just, like outside of the morality of this and everything like that, we need them to win because the right is the side of the honest conversation. And if the honest conversation says w- we are going to create a society where you are treated, you know, in, in, in a way that is demonstrably unfair or something like that then they’re gonna be like, “Well, I don’t, I don’t wanna be a part of that coalition,” right?
Whereas the left, they can have these conversations where one minute they say something Islamist and the next minute they go to Pride, right? Because it, there’s no inter- it doesn’t matter whether they’re being logical or, or not. But as long as we are the logical conversation, we can’t play that game, and we need to push back against people who are performatively racist not to show
Because there’s, like, the jokey performative racism, which a, a lot of people on the right do to sort of show in group where they’re not truly being spiteful about a group, right? But they’re saying something that’s edgy, and so you know, “Okay, yeah, he’s one of us,” right? Like I can, I can take [00:43:00] what he’s saying seriously.
An, an example of this, Leaflet actually had a really funny joke, is she was looking at all the protesters outside the Anthony trial, and she said that she should start a stand for you know, that juice-soaked pineapple trend. Have you not seen the juice-soaked pineapple trend?
Simone Collins: I heard there’s something about pineapples and Kool-Aid and the CIA that’s floating about the internet, but not this.
Black people
Malcolm Collins: apparently, like, invented this thing where they sort of pickle a pineapple in heavily sugared juice.
And it’s an extremely high calorie thing, and there’s videos of, like, fat Black woman eating it, and then Asmongold tried it, and he said it’s disgusting. But it’s become, like, the, the joke, the Black thing, right?
And, and so she said that’s not genuinely being mean to that group or anything like that. It’s just being edgy. Like- It’s like the, I don’t know, the, the w- w- with the watermelons of our generation or something like that. Oh. Or the fried chicken of our generation. It’s like,
Simone Collins: if you- Well, isn’t it kind of like making fun of [00:44:00] a basic white b***h for liking pumpkin spice lattes?
Malcolm Collins: Yes. It’s exactly like a, a basic white b***h l- And, and it’s so weird that for a while in our society you could say, “Oh, pumpkin spice latte,” like, as a joke about white women, right? And everyone would laugh. And you say fried chicken, why, why, why is that a problem to say? Like, fried chicken’s a tasty thing, right?
Like, it’s not like- Really good ... disparaging a community to say that they like fried chicken. It’s not like saying they like
Simone Collins: being- It’s a testament to good taste. Now all I want is Wing Bucket. No.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, like if, if, if, if you were talking about, like, okay, maybe if you say that, like, Indians smell like curry or something.
I mean, I generally think curry smells good, but, like, I could see that being disparaging. But saying you like fried chicken is just like- Saying you have to- Duh ... is disproportionately true in the community. It’s like a known- Yeah ... bla, bla, bla. But we as- Yeah, yeah, yeah ... a society just, like, acted like, “Oh my God, you can’t do that,” which shows one thing- Yeah, I
Simone Collins: guess it’s-
exactly ... maybe there’s an episode in that on its own. I’d kind of like to explore, [00:45:00] like, why kind of teasing a, a racial, national, or ethnic group about food sometimes is okay and sometimes not. Like, if someone’s like, “Oh, those natto-eating Japanese,” like, I don’t really know anyone who eats natto who’s not Japanese.
And it’s really- What the heck is natto? I think it’s really gross. Most people, even, like, a lot of Japanese people think it’s really gross, but, like, talking about it isn’t gonna make it get me in trouble, whereas, like- What is natto? Natto is a very, very healthy but kinda st- like, really, like, mucusy fermented soybean.
Really good for you, like incredibly healthy food. But-
Malcolm Collins: Okay ...
Simone Collins: yeah, I’m, I’m not for it
Malcolm Collins: Are you workshop slurs here? Natto eaters, is that too much of a-
Simone Collins: Na- natto, N-A-T-T-O, natto. People
Malcolm Collins: aren’t even gonna be able to pronounce this. This is ridiculous. You’re- Well, anyway- You’re
Simone Collins: not even- I, I don’t get it.
Like, it’s, it’s one of those things of, like, can, can you not? Like, like, I know that... Like, I stayed with a Japanese family once where, like, one, one family member would eat it every morning for breakfast. He was a doctor. He knew how good it was for you, and it’s like a [00:46:00] very traditional Japanese, like, breakfast food over rice.
And, like, the rest of the family was like, “That’s nasty.” But, like, but but then I’m sure there are lots of people per this, like, pineapple dish you’re describing, within communities where it’s popular who are like, “That’s nasty.” And I think that there are lots of people in the white community who are like, “I am not ever going to touch a pumpkin spice latte.
I, I am, I’m a purist. I only drink espresso from the specially sourced coffee bean.” Right? Like- Right ... why is it weird to... Anyway, we’re getting off topic. Well, because it’s weird because
Malcolm Collins: we created a racial caste system. That is what happened. It was a caste system where different social norms applied to different groups.
This is historically what we called racism where one group had specific social norms around their behavior that was expected to be followed, and they got, they, they got used to it being the case that they couldn’t be criticized as a group.
Simone Collins: Oh, Germans and krauts. So there, there was that against white people, and doughboys.
Well,
Malcolm Collins: potato [00:47:00] eaters, you know,
Simone Collins: I don’t... Was potato eaters this? I’ve never heard potato eaters. I’ve heard krauts. I’ve heard doughboys. This is for the Irish Well, yeah, but I’ve never heard someone say that. I’ve heard people say krauts. I’ve heard people say-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but it, th- those terms are horrible.
But the point being is imagine when you’re trying to understand how somebody could, like, be like, “Oh, it’s disgusting that this person was tried for a crime they obviously committed,” right? How you end up with that mindset is you first have to live a life where your group is never responsible for the things it does, and this is genuinely the world they lived in.
When you could not talk about Black crime statistics without being yelled at for being a racist, that means that they grew up without hearing that at equivalent rates of incomes, Black have significantly higher rates of homicides, right? Like a, a, a per- when... Because that wasn’t part of the conversation, it warped their brains.
Because they grew up seeing, like, “Oh, I can just Snapchat myself graping someone, and I get off scot-free,” right? Like, it warped their perception, and it’s funny that the left [00:48:00] n- normalize this term, but when you grow up with privilege being treated equally feels like persecution. And we as a society, even on the right, even you, a sane person, I think didn’t realize how much privilege many of these people grew up with.
The feeling that whenever they are... And we see this in our society. Whenever they you know, suppose they, like, run a scam on a place and they get caught. Now all of a sudden they can scream racism, right? You know, with, with, with bricks and minifigs being like, “Oh, this is anti-Mormon bigotry,” right?
You know, getting so used to claiming this group status means that you personally, maybe your entire life, never really felt what responsibility feels like because it was always the other person’s fault because you were always taught to make it the other person’s fault. And that allowed you to violently escalate like this.
And I think that we, like, when you talk about how do you, and every, every, [00:49:00] I think, like, Black person or a Muslim who actually cares about the future of their communities. Well, Muslims are a bit different because they have a different long-term goal, but Black person at least in the United States. When they think about how they wanna fix their community, they know step one is responsibility.
Like, when they’re being... Because you can’t begin to teach anything else until you can teach responsibility. And if you watch older Black content, this was the core thing that they were trying to teach. They were like, “This is the direction we need to go as a people.” And it was something that was even core to Black culture, as we point out.
In the 1950s, Blacks had half the rate of out-of-wedlock births that the white population had. But anyway, thoughts, Simona. Am I, am I going too far here?
Simone Collins: I still feel like there’s something missing in the discourse. Like, there’s something missing in How, like what, these people who are posting like, “Well [00:50:00] good, I’m glad that this person did this.”
‘Cause what, what they’re saying is, I think what I worry about is that we’re just seeing an increased escalation where it’s like a Chinese finger trap, right? Where like one side is like really, really mad and then the other side starts pulling away too, and then like we just keep doing this and it gets tighter.
No, no,
Malcolm Collins: no, no, no, no, no, no. You’re completely misinterpreting what you, what, what you’re seeing. What you saw was one side that secretly had really, really atrocious, abhorrent, evil perspectives, opinions, and goals, but that didn’t publicly voice it. And the other side now being like, “Wait, you’re not actually saying it’s okay to just stab a white kid, right?
Like, and it’s, you don’t actually think he should face... You don’t actually think that you should be able to kill a white girl then have the police cover for you, right?” And the other side being like, “No, that is our position.” And you hearing them say, “No, that is our position,” [00:51:00] your confusion comes from the fact that you feel like they have reactively backed into this position when that’s not what happened.
This is just their revealed preferences for a long time finally being forced to be put on the table
That’s, that’s... And I, I think if you think about these positions, if you look at the writings of Dorhan Montani, the way they talk about colonizers versus colonized the way that they, they talk about any of this, right? Like you even talked to me about this where you, there’s this phenomenon of white progressive women feeling like they have to go ask people for permission to have children ‘cause they do not want to accidentally increase the white population, right?
Like, that is an, a racial underclass when you’re at that, that point. And I think that we as a society overly tried to think of them as just sort of like a more extreme position of like whatever Democrats were in the ‘90s or whatever, and that’s not what we’re seeing here, okay? We’re seeing a political ideology [00:52:00] that needs to be responded to with, I think, a level of force that we in the United States are not used to needing to use.
But it, it-
Simone Collins: So explicitly then, what is your proposed solution?
Malcolm Collins: As I’ve said, I think the politics of right-wing I- Israel is the politics the right-wing United States needs to move towards. I think that that is the, the realistic... Like basically a lot of people are gonna have to be deported. A lot of people are gonna have to be deported, and it’s not gonna look nice.
But we need to stop sympathizing with obvious bad actors and understand that the enablers of the bad actors are as bad as the bad actors themselves because they prevent punishment from being handed out. If you’re the person who lets go of the grapist, right, like the gang grapist and then they go out and do that to somebody else, you’re as responsible as they are for that, and we need [00:53:00] to be applying that responsibility throughout society.
To people like Cardi B, to people like the people who are tweeting this, to The Guardian, to these leftist organizations and politicians. While ensuring that we do not normalize an environment where people of different backgrounds do not feel comfortable because they can help us, right? They can be our biggest enforcers.
And the, you know, the Sikhs, like, yeah, we, yeah, we need to get rid of the bad actors in the Sikh community. We need to get rid of these immigrants who are coming here, taking all the... That’s a person who you can get to vote for you, and now you can win, you can win elections, right? Or you can have run on your side and win an election, right?
Like, I know you may not like it. You may have to hold your nose now that you’ve developed some sort of like racial consciousness, but your racial conscious ideals will never win in an environment where you act as an eth- an a, an antagonistic ethno-nationalist rather than a team [00:54:00] player.
Simone Collins: Yikes.
Malcolm Collins: And I feel strongly about this ‘cause we can never do anything about the bad actors as long as we enable the bad actors on our side that prevent us from winning the big tent.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, no, that’s true because, well, they’re, they’re the primary blocker of genuinely moving forward as long as they, they get to, like, represent the movement or become, at least be accused of being a face of it even if they’re not.
‘Cause that’s the, I think the big problem is all these people on the left are refusing to even engage with any critical thinking because a single person who is genuinely racist is showing up in the protests, right? And then, like, that, the presence of that one person- And
Malcolm Collins: that allows them... Th- I mean, think about what the left’s saying.
They say if one racist person comes, we can just kill them. Yeah,
Simone Collins: it renders everyone else’s opinions entirely moot. They, they don’t count. But remember,
Malcolm Collins: it’s that it renders everyone else, because they say, you know, kill a [00:55:00] Nazi, right? E- everyone else now, because anyone who goes into a room with a Nazi is a Nazi, as they say.
So if one bad actor shows up at a protest, and remember they’re considered, like, just MAGA Nazis at this point which is more than 50% of the American population they, they consider everyone there a target to be murdered, right? Like, as we’ve seen from their repost. And I think that we on the right just need to wake up and realize that.
They’re not just saying it. It is, it is, they’re doing it, right? Like, it’s, it’s, it’s, it, th- they’re cheering for it. You have to stand up in a way that can allow you to win. Yeah. And the way that... And that’s the other thing. I just get so angry. I have as much anger at an individual like Nick Fuentes as I do against one of these people because he is functionally protecting them through his politics.
And I think you should view him with as much disgust as somebody like Cardi B.
Simone Collins: Does he express racist,
Malcolm Collins: like- He won’t build partnerships with, like, Indians or [00:56:00] people in interracial relationships like JD Vance.
Simone Collins: You know? Oh, right, I forgot. Right, even that was too far for him.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, so- Okay ... you’re never gonna win.
You’re never gonna win in the United States with those views. So it’s stupid and it prevents us from actually creating an accountable country Anyway Love you. Hopefully I- This is depressing because I
Simone Collins: don’t see this resolving anytime soon.
Malcolm Collins: I love we had a, w- I’ve been posting instead of just the boring gear, I was like, “Oh, let’s post some RFAB images,” right?
And I’ve been posting images of my wife, and somebody thought they were a sexualized Catholic nun, and I’m
Simone Collins: like- Two, two people thought that they were nuns and as- Did you respond
Malcolm Collins: to them?
Simone Collins: I did. Th- that is disappointing because nuns and Puritans do not dress the same at all. Like, there’s a very big difference between a habit and a bonnet, but-
Malcolm Collins: No, a habit and a bonnet look nothing alike.
Your outfit looks nothing
Simone Collins: like a nun. Well, there, there are many different types of habits with different forms of cowls or no [00:57:00] cowls, and some, some habits I know of some orders do look quite minimal, but they never look like bonnets, but I don’t know. I mean, what are you gonna do? Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: you can tell by your outfit.
It had a clear Protestant church behind it in multiple of the images, right? You know, a, y- your, your outfit is incredibly distinct. You dress like a medieval woman. Which by the way, we want to make more of a thing. When I learned that Leaflet in real life dresses this way, and, like, a bunch of other people dress this way-
Simone Collins: Yeah, it seems like other people in the, the base camp world also have wives who dress this way.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, we
Simone Collins: need to make this, like, the, the conservative womanly- Or themselves dress this way ...
Malcolm Collins: way of dressing going forward. I, it’s fun. I like it. It’s you know, it’s, it, it’s cool and aspirational, and doesn’t, like, try hard to, like- Try hard ... be a goth or something like that.
Simone Collins: Well, the argument I was making to Malcolm is that it’s I think there’s this point of peak enshittification of modern clothing.
At which people are going to have to just have this reckoning of either they are going to admit that they’re wearing the equivalent of hospital gowns, of, like, just Kleenex that’s going to fall apart after a couple wears that they have to keep rebuying or [00:58:00] they’re going to declare bankruptcy and, and take a totally different approach to clothing.
And one of those approaches is just to go back and, like, you know, I’m just gonna wear a chemise and a skirt and cinch it in with stays or a girdle or a belt. And, like, that works, because it, it fits all sizes. It changes as your size fluctuates. It’s great in all weathers. It’s just so useful.
Especially if you get more durable natural fiber fabrics of higher quality. So let’s make it a thing. Yes.
Malcolm Collins: I love it and agree, but yeah, I, I, I, I was, like, personally offended that they watch you every day and they, th- that wasn’t immediately... She has big circular glasses, a Puritan outfit, and wears a bonnet, which Simone wears on occasion.
Anyway, the... But I wanted to, the reason I’m posting her, by the way, is I’m like, “Look, we on the right can be cool and sexy and alluring. That’s not the same as being promiscuous.”
Simone Collins: Maybe not. I don’t think everyone-
Malcolm Collins: No ...
Simone Collins: thinks that deranged looking Puritan woman is cool and sexy. [00:59:00]
Malcolm Collins: I, I think fun anime girls is, is part of how we win this.
AI anime girls is a weapon the left doesn’t have. So let’s have fun. Let’s be the side of the party, and stop policing everything, and stop yelling- about everything because if we make our side not fun, we’re not gonna be able to pull people over. There is a difference between degeneracy and a fully clothed long sleeve AI of your wife with a yandere face.
You know? That, that, those two things are as far apart as possible, and I think we need to reflectively not attack things that are not actually in any way immoral or bad. Getting people on board with the idea that Christianity can be fun and alluring is, is the... Even the Catholic Church made an anime girl, right?
You know? Something we should do. Anyway, have fun, Simone. Love you to death.
Simone Collins: Love you too, Malcolm Okay. Hello, Simone. You
Malcolm Collins: look beautiful today.
Simone Collins: So do you. You look sharp- Yeah ... even though I know [01:00:00] you need to sleep. Did you sleep today? Did you sleep? I did.
Malcolm Collins: I slept for like an hour and a half.
Simone Collins: Oh, yeah. I did. Yeah. Even though you, like, woke up at 2:00 AM. That’s not gonna help you. ‘Cause you stayed up later than I did, pretty sure.
I think your light was still on when I went to sleep. Ugh
Malcolm Collins: Well, there’s so much to do. I, I know- Yeah, but what happens if you, I mean, I’m
Simone Collins: dead or if you die or get dementia, like, what good are you to any of that work, right?
Malcolm Collins: Well, I’ve gotten everything I needed to done.
Simone Collins: So you’re gonna go to sleep super early tonight?
Because you were staying up way too late. You need to start chilling earlier so you can be relaxed
Malcolm Collins: and up for sleep. Well, guess what we have working on the site now, is better not safe for work image-to-image model systems.
Simone Collins: Well, thank you. That’s what I
Malcolm Collins: was killing myself over, is
Simone Collins: getting those- Now people can goon more efficiently.
Thank you.
Malcolm Collins: We need money.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Well.
Malcolm Collins: You know, and this is what people pay for, okay? The, the, that is the world we live in. Yes, Jerome ... and so if, if I can, I will make money doing that. It’s RFAB, by the way, dot AI, for people who wanna try it. The, I mean, the main thing that people use [01:01:00] it for is narrative storytelling, like a choose-your-own-adventure type story.
It’s where you can build your own narrative engine and play through them with any frontier model you want.
Simone Collins: And I primarily use it for vibe- Image ... any vibe coding I’ve ever done has been on RFAB, and then I, lots of image generation. It has such a good image generator.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: And recipe generation now.
Malcolm Collins: And we charge a- across the board, a 50% flat margin on any model that you’re using which is, like, way less than almost any other site.
Most it’s 5X margin. It’s enormous. Well,
Simone Collins: the best thing about it is its latest video tutorials, which I don’t think you’ve brought live yet. I, I wanna be able to post them next to- No, they’re all live. Video tutorials are all- Did you upload them to the folder that I can use to post them elsewhere online, because
Malcolm Collins: they- Do you like how angry I look in them?
Simone Collins: They’re, they’re very angry tutorials. Like, he’ll be like, “Okay, and how to use our recipe tool. Actually, never mind. If you can’t figure that out yourself, you’re mentally deficient.” He’ll, like, go through steps and be like, “You know what? Just figure it out.” Like, it’s, it’s, it’s great. I agree. And they’re actually helpful.
To be clear, these [01:02:00] are very helpful. They walk you through the process. They’ve made things that I’m like, “I don’t wanna try this. I don’t know how to do it.” Like, I don’t, oh, and there’s... ‘Cause he- The VTube- ... he puts in a lot of options. It can be kind of overwhelming to look at the screen. I think the video tutorials are genuinely useful.
I just also find the delivery extremely entertaining because he’s so irritable about it. So-
Malcolm Collins: Because I have tooltips explaining
Simone Collins: this to people. I know, it’s just I’m so used to, like, very tedious tutorials. You know, it’s like, “Da-na-na, next you do this,” and here it’s, like, actually both funny and useful, so thank you.
Malcolm Collins: So yeah, on the on the, This is for the VTubers where we have the, the biggest tutorial. We also have one for ImageGen, and we have one for, Oh. What’s the other one for? We have one for the new AIDubber. That’s the one thing that doesn’t c- take a 50% margin. It’s just, it’s so expensive to dev full anime episodes.
It’s, like, 10 bucks or something. So for that reason we only take a 20% margin on that.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Because I wanna be magnanimous or whatever.
Simone Collins: Well, you wanna be practical. I mean, anime [01:03:00] watchers need their time or money for merch tables at anime cons
Octavian Collins: Mommy, I running, I ran downstairs and I fell b- before.
I was trying to place in the stairs, and now I need a replacement.
Simone Collins: Well, I will give you a replacement after we’re done recording. But now you can just leave that here, and I’ll fix it when I’m done recording, okay?
Octavian Collins: Okay. You can let me use one of the pins from that
Simone Collins: like- That is exactly what- Yeah ... I’m gonna be doing.
Octavian Collins: Yeah, you can get, like, another of these, like, from the other finger thing.
Simone Collins: Yeah, just leave it on your desk, okay?
Octavian Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins: Thank you, love. Have fun. Be safe.
Speaker 26: A ravine A ravine? Yeah. That’s scary. Do you want the kids to survive? Yeah. Do you want the evil hacker to survive? Yeah. Oh, well, let’s see what happens. Uh-oh. Doesn’t look good for him, does it? I don’t think- You don’t like him very much? Where’s the ravine? The ravine? Well, he’s kind of in it now
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this Based Camp episode, Simone and Malcolm Collins explore an expanded framework for personal morality and “modern sins” designed to maximize mental health, personal efficacy, and long-term human flourishing. Framed through a Christian and Techno-Puritan lens, they discuss how biblical morality has iteratively improved over time and why we need updated rules for today’s world.
Topics include: avoiding busywork and performative suffering, rejecting pride and status signaling, the dangers of inaction and moral absolutism, self-flagellation, empty words, corrupted mercy, and living with aplomb. They emphasize consequentialist ethics focused on future human (and post-human) flourishing through science, technology, and disciplined living.
A practical guide to building a better life, overcoming common traps, and aligning daily actions with higher purpose. Applicable to Christians, secular listeners, and anyone seeking a high-agency value system.
Techno-Puritan Sins, Summarized
Sin, per Techno-Puritanism, is any pattern of behavior—mental, emotional, or practical—that wastes your capacity or undermines long-term flourishing for yourself or humanity.
All Techno-Puritan sins are derived from a single principle:
* Maximize long-term human flourishing and effectiveness
* Minimize:
* Wasted effort
* Short-term thinking
* Self-indulgent or performative behavior
1. Acting from social expectation (performative living)
It is sinful to:
* Do things just because they’re expected (e.g., ceremonies, reunions).
* Especially when they don’t align with your goals or values.
Why? Obligation without purpose is wasted life energy.
2. Pride as social comparison (“proving others wrong”)
It is sinful to motivate yourself primarily by:
* Showing others you’re better than them.
* Seeking validation through superiority.
Why? External validation distorts decision-making. Seeking it may produce shallow or misaligned decisions.
3. Living to fit an image or archetype
It is sinful to:
* Make decisions to match a role (e.g., “ideal Christian,” “alpha male,” “tradwife”).
* Prioritize appearance of virtue over actual outcomes.
Why? Doing so drives one to “perform goodness” instead of doing good and leads to inefficient or even harmful choices.
4. Wasted effort / misaligned roles
It is sinful to do things that:
* Don’t actually help others
* Aren’t valued by those they’re meant to serve (e.g. Performing “ideal spouse” behaviors that your partner doesn’t need or want.)
Why? Effort without impact is morally wasteful.
5. Busywork (major emphasis)
It is sinful to:
* Spend time on on tasks that feel productive but aren’t meaningful (e.g. Working 12 hours but accomplishing less than 2 focused hours.)
* This Includes:
* Overwork without output
* Performative productivity
* Inefficient labor
Why it’s considered especially bad:
* Reduces overall effectiveness
* Crowds out meaningful work
* Worse than leisure because it gives no recovery or benefit
6. Pure indulgence without purpose
It is sinful to
* Do things solely for personal pleasure with no broader benefit (e.g. indulging in excess entertainment or sexual behavior detached from long-term outcomes)
Nuance:
* Some indulgence is tolerated if it supports long-term function (rest, motivation).
7. Performative suffering / overwork signaling
It is sinful to:
* Show off stress, exhaustion, or hardship as a badge of honor.
* This includes:
* Bragging about long hours
* Glorifying burnout
Why? Suffering is not inherently virtuous—only meaningful outcomes are.
8. Emotional indulgence (lack of “aplomb”)
It is sinful to adopt unproductive emotional states, such as:
* Self-pity
* Anger
* Excessive grief expression
* Cynicism or snark
Why?
* Emotions are (to a degree) controllable and reinforce themselves.
* Indulging in negative emotions:
* Harms others
* Weakens self-control
* Reduces effectiveness
* Conversely, maintaining calm, forward-moving resilience, especially in hardship, imparts strength to oneself and others
9. Self-deception about morality
It is sinful to convince yourself that:
* You’re being virtuous when you’re not
* Busywork or image-performance equals goodness
Why? Mislabeling behavior prevents improvement.
10. Failure to pursue meaningful contribution
It is sinful to not direct effort toward:
* Long-term human progress
* Knowledge, science, or societal development
Why? Immediate charity often distracts from long-term impact and can actively run counter to efforts that would maximize long-term human flourishing.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be discussing personal re- morality as it relates to, one, this is going to focus on just general advice for living a good life. Hmm. And a good way to structure your life to overcome many of the challenges that people face.
So this would be applicable to people of Christian perspective, non-Christian perspective, techno-Puritan perspective. But I’m gonna be couching it within the framing of I’m talking to Christians here. Okay? And the reason I’m couching it in that is because when we look at something like the Bible, people often get hung up.
They’re like, “Wait, so I read all these parts about morality and, like, the seven deadly sins in the Bible and the Commandments, and then I read stuff like, ‘If a man sells his daughter as a slave, she is not to go free as male slaves do. If she does not please the master who selected her for himself, he must let her be redeemed.
He has no right to sell her to other foreigners because he has broken faith with [00:01:00] her. If he selects her for his sons, he must grant her the rights of a daughter. If he marries her to another woman, he must not deprive the first one of food, clothing, or marital rights. If he does not provide her with these things, she is to go free without any payment of money.’”
And people are like, “Wait, is that a bunch of rules about how to sell your daughter into slavery and then treat her afterwards?” You know, like, they do seem like nice rules about selling your daughter into slavery, but it would seem like it might have been better to just not do that, to just be like, if you’re thinking of selling your daughter into slavery, and, like, pretty clearly because it, it talks about potentially marrying her sex slavery is what we would call that today don’t do it.
And the way that Christians and Jews get around this is they go, “Well, iteratively, that was a more moral way of dealing with slavery than other common traditions of this period.” Hmm. And we have a whole episode where we go through that. And if you look at our last tract where we also went into morality at the societal level, we talk about the [00:02:00] many...
Like, you, you remember me going over them. It was a number of them, places in the Bible where God commands people to kill infants, and lots of infants. Like, the number of infants is very, very high, right?
Speaker 7: If you want to go through that, check out the episode, “Christianity Was Never a Religion of Peace” that we released, last week. It’s a great episode. , We cite all the verses where this happens, , and it’s a pretty frequent thing throughout the Old Testament
Malcolm Collins: And so people are like, “Okay, well,” he told people to do that because those societies were practicing child sacrifice.”
And I was like, “That’s not a very moral answer.” That’s like saying, “Oh, we rescued a bunch of children from Epstein’s island, so we killed them all?” Like, presumably if you’re saving the children who might be child sacrifice, right? Like, you don’t kill the... And note here the term used in some of these instances.
You can’t be like, “Oh, he’s only talking about toddlers who has absorbed the culture.” They use terms meaning, like, breastfeeding infant, like suckling infants, right? Like, [00:03:00] very young. So it’s like, okay What’s going on here, right? Was this just like iteratively more moral than what came before it? Do these types of things still hold?
And how does this hold at like a personal level? And what I’ll note here is what we see, if you take the stance that God said all of this because it was iteratively better than the way things used to be done before he laid those things out, then presumably it’s been a pretty long time since the New Testament was written.
More is expected of us or a more advanced understanding of morality is expected from us than what- Yeah ... was laid out in the New Testament
So what are those things? And that’s what we’re gonna go into today, is basically a new and expanded understanding of sins that will help you be like, “Hmm, if I just make a personal commitment to never do this list of [00:04:00] things, I will be both a much more mentally healthy person, I will be a much more efficacious person, and I will be able to do a lot more to push human civilization forwards.”
And note here when we talk about pushing human civilization forwards, obviously this is a wider, like, technopuri- puritan track series, but it’s, we try to make them more applicable to general Christians now as well. One of the fun things that you see in regards to us talking about the sons of man, which you also see all over the Bible.
You know, by the way, I didn’t make up the term the sons of man. That’s all over the Old Testament. Very weird way to talk about people. Why would you talk about people as the sons of man, right? Like, that’s a... W- why in
Simone Collins: the world- Yeah, why not just, you know, humans or people?
Malcolm Collins: Why not just man, right? Well, suppose that these rules were supposed to apply to not just the humans we have today, but when we become a space-faring species, when we take our manifest destiny among the stars, we’re going to need to use genetic technology.
You basically have to. You can’t easily have people live their entire lives in zero G without some [00:05:00] form of gene editing, and most other planets are gonna require some gene editing to live on. And how extensive that goes could be bigger than that. You’re gonna eventually have some humans that are AI integrations.
You’re gonna have some humans... we’re gonna have AI working alongside us. So we take the sons of man to mean all of the intelligences which are downstream of humanity be those AI intelligences, uplifted animals, human intelligences of the far future that are genetically modified and stuff like that, and that’s why it says the sons of man.
I like that fun little, like, weird prediction of the applicability that that would have to have, but it tracks with the way society looks like it’s going. So if we’re looking at that and we’re asking, okay, so if God’s sort of broader moral framework and at least how it’s expressed seems to shift over time how can we find out what he really wanted with those frameworks?
Like, what was the point of the frameworks as they were laid out? And it appears [00:06:00] fairly clear, because we can look at the effects that these frameworks had on individuals and society at large. Okay. Which is an increased amount of human flourishing, right? This is human technological, civilizational flourishing, right?
The reason why you would want to create more humane rules around the selling of your daughter into slavery
Speaker 3: I was on a stream with Leaflet and somebody was asking, “What are sins?” ‘Cause we were talking about them more broadly, and I was like, “When you boil it down, sins are just a list of things that will up your life.”
Some of them may seem like a good idea in the short term,. In the same way eating candy every morning for breakfast might.
Speaker 6: What’s going on? Maybe it’s all this stuff that you both eat. Oh, you get off that? No, honestly, it’s true. Okay. Moss, what did you have for breakfast this morning? Smarty Cereal. Oh my God. I didn’t even know Smarty made a [00:07:00] cereal. They don’t. It’s just smarties and a bowl with milk.
Speaker 3: But in the long term, you’re going to suffer from it. It’s basically a long list of... And we saw this in one of the recent episodes we did on, , you know, rampant consumerization of human sexuality leading to the normalization of things like abortion and this destroying people’s lives, right?
, The, the sin that they were committing, , ended up having this absolutely huge deleterious negative impact on them. The women who go out and w***e themselves when they’re younger, the effect that this is gonna happen when they hit the wall, and then nobody wants them anymore, and then, , you know, you see this with pride, lying.
, Look at what’s going on with the Bricks & Minifigs CEO right now, right? , There is no sin, there’s no, like, rule that we’re given that isn’t long term in our own best interest. Sins are just a really [00:08:00] long list of, “Don’t piss on the electric fence.” , And so if we are increasing the number of sins or expanding our understanding of sin, , it’s basically expanding this.
Good rules to live by, good things to look out for. And when I pointed this out on, on stream, some people were like, “Well, no, you know, sins need to be, like, this really difficult thing to deal with. This really, like...” And it’s like they are insofar that anything you do purely for your own self-interest is a sin.
, EG playing video games or something like that. , And e- and even those things can eventually have negative effects on you. , But in terms of the more, like, explicitly labeled sins, , for example, sleeping with another dude’s wife, right? Like, it may feel good in the moment, but not even... Y- you don’t even need to say, like, civilizationally this is a bad idea to normalize.
It’s just obviously gonna come back and cause you more pain in the, in the long term.
And I would also [00:09:00] note that this seems to be a core thing that differentiates Christianity from other Abrahamic traditions. Like, I don’t think there’s anything actually negative, at least within a modern context, , where like a Muslim can’t eat pork, right? Like, I don’t think pork actually has any negative externalities in a modern context.
Or where a Jew cannot mix, you know, linen and flax in a single outfit. but in Christianity, I am unaware of any Christian sins where I’m like, “This is just an obscure thing that was totally unique to a specific era.”
Malcolm Collins: Sorry, what, what does he want?
Simone Collins: He wants to tell the viewers what he learned.
Octavian Collins: Like Germs can go in your body and some- they’re, they’re like tiny little dots, they can multiply. Multiply. Wait.
Malcolm Collins: So germs
Octavian Collins: get into you- White blood cells kind of have like mouth thingies that eat the [00:10:00] like germs that are like the other things I was talking about recently, the green things.
Simone Collins: Smart. Smart
Malcolm Collins: so first, how do you determine , , and the fact that the way that God expresses his morality has changed over time shows that the intentionality of God on humanity through these systems as they have evolved is that is, it’s consequentialist in its framing, right?
Like it, it, it is based on some outcome, right?
Simone Collins: Well, and as you framed it in a different conversation when you discussed morality on the societal level, you argue that the New Testament was made for a point- At which human civilization had become much more globalized already, and you had different cultures interacting more, and you needed to begin to mask the brutality of Christianity to appear to be symbiotic so as to not become an existential threat to other cultures and obligate those cultures to completely [00:11:00] take out Christianity.
Malcolm Collins: Exactly. But it, but even, I mean, during the early period when they enter it ended the period where that was necessary. When they began to take over the, the Roman Empire they did not forget how brutal their religious teachings actually are. Mm. They just that, that only became sublimated later.
That only... I- in like the last 100 years, I wanna say, is really when the, all those parts of the Bible were forgotten. But to continue here. Except by some groups like the Quakers who, they annoy me, and the Anabaptists who I generally like. But anyway, to continue here. So what’s a good way to build your life in terms of like moral rules and everything like that?
So first, and you can see how to do this in The Pragmatist’s Guide to Life, is build an objective function. That is, think through whatever it is, whether it’s because God, you know, you’re coming at this from a Christian perspective or you’re coming at this from a completely secular perspective the collection of things that you think is of intrinsic good to maximize with your life.[00:12:00]
And then build a set of functions around that. By that what I mean is it might be like, well, within my life, maybe some of these things will be purely indulgent. I think I need X level of happiness, and once that’s satisfied, then I will put all of my effort into X or Y. You know, that’s the way functions are constructed.
Like 50% into doing this, 50% into doing this. Now if you’re a techno-puritan, you’re just gonna have one framing coming from what I was talking about here, which is what is God’s plan? God’s plan is continued human flourishing, so it’s probably some level of comfort. And then once you reach that level of comfort that’s needed for, you know, maximum personal efficacy and not distraction then focus on maximizing future human flourishing.
And this is often best done through scientific advancement, which we’re gonna get to in a bit, right? Which is to say, generally speaking there are many places where you could, for example give money to the poor, right? And over, in 100 years, [00:13:00] in 200 years, because God doesn’t love somebody in 200 years and I don’t care less about somebody in 200 years than I care about a human today which is going to help more aggregate people?
Almost always things that help the civilization continue developing are going to have a bigger impact. And, and note that’s not just technology. That’s things that help it economically develop. That’s things that help it develop in terms of its moral systems how it deals with outside or parasitic groups that are exploiting systems.
So we’ll get into all of that. And also note here this line I think highlights what I think is expected In terms of dedicating yourself to an extent to continued scientific progress. When we did our episode on Genesis not being incompatible with science one of the things we, we, we kept getting in the comments is, like, people forgot that, like, all of the early scientific advancements were made by people who were trying to understand God better.
Yeah. Right? Like, they, they... And, and even the Bible, like, goes into this. So, if you look at lines like, “ It is the glory of God [00:14:00] to conceal a matter. To search out a matter is the glory of kings.” Mm. Which is to say you, the best of you, the best of humanity your greatest endeavor is the search of knowledge of things that God has not made immediately obvious, right?
Mm. So when somebody’s like, “Oh, well, you know, God didn’t exactly and very cleanly lay out evolution in the Bible,” why didn’t he do that, right? Why, why wasn’t that done? It’s like, oh, it’s the glory of God to conceal a matter, and to search out a matter is the glory of kings. Which is to say that if you take a approach to everything that does not update post Jesus’ time perspective on our understanding of nature and the world, you’re literally acting in rebellion to what the Bible is telling you to do.
Simone Collins: Right.
Malcolm Collins: All right. So- If you’re just inventing a religion for, like, savages, telling them, like, “Don’t give yourself to lust, don’t give yourself to gluttony, don’t give yourself...” You know, like, seven deadly sins, stuff like that. Original Ten [00:15:00] Commandments. Very easy rules. But there are so many deleterious things that trap humans today at a significantly more socially and morally developed standpoint.
I think it’s worth laying out additional sins so that you can easily categorize these in your head. So let’s jump right into these.
Speaker 4: Note, , I think the majority of the additional sins I’m gonna be laying out are things that we are warned against at some point or another in the New Testament. , It’s just that the warnings are often not as explicit or salient in the way that the New Testament is often taught today.
, So if I give one of these out and you’re like, “Oh, actually, , this line here could be used to mean that,” yeah, I know
Malcolm Collins: And do try to keep track as we’re going, Simone, so you can add any that you think I miss here. Okay. ‘Cause we now have, like, actual people who follow our religion. I’m like, well, if we’re doing that, we should do more to help them live a good life,
Simone Collins: right?
Well, we need to make our... I mean, we’re gonna be following these rules, too. We’ve been discussing this all week, so we need to have our own internal... [00:16:00] Well, we need a list we can publish somewhere. Yeah. Well, this
Malcolm Collins: actually came up with me this week, where I was like, should I go to my high school reunion, or should I not go to my high school reunion?
And it would have been, like, a 24-hour car ride, right? And I was like, one, no, that is against my objective function. It is cleanly against my objective function. It is purely indulgent, but it’s not even an indulgence that will make me happy. And this here comes to the first sin of modernity, which is doing a thing because of societal expectation.
Simone Collins: Mm.
Malcolm Collins: You... Anytime you do a thing just because you think that it is what’s expected of you, like a graduation ceremony. How did the graduation ceremony actually help you, right? Or is it just a waste of time? Now, if you are doing it because your parents paid for you to go to college, and they’ll be proud, and that’s why you’re going, fine.
But if your parents aren’t showing up, why are you? Right? That is time that you could be [00:17:00] spending on doing something productive that moves yourself forward, educating yourself more, or moves human civilization forward. A second one here, which I’m really, this comes to the graduation thing. I wanna go to the graduation and I wanna show all these people, look at, look at me.
Look, look at how great I am these days, right? I’m doing so much better than you. I have a Wikipedia page. I have all these followers. A that, that makes me amazing, and look at you and your sad lives th- that aren’t doing anything, right? That-
Simone Collins: Which, and this, this is a big motivational factor for many people.
Malcolm Collins: It is. Is what, what the Bible was trying to warn us about was pride. But I think people have recontextualized it. People motivate themselves, and I motivated myself when I was younger in a big way by owning the people who thought they were better than me. And this is a unique, I think even genetically baked in problem with people of the backwards tradition.
Yeah. Is we just love, get deep satisfaction of owning people who think they’re better than us. And I’m not [00:18:00] saying you should never indulge in that satisfaction if you can use it to motivate efficacious and moral behavior. However I am saying that you shouldn’t do it if it’s leading you to do something which is purely indulgent.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: This is the same way where, like, feeling good during sex isn’t bad if you’re using it for procreation, obviously, right? ‘
Simone Collins: Cause that’s the point. That’s what is, it was evolved to motivate.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but it can still pull you down a path of evil, right? If you approach it the wrong way. All right, so, tho- f- first two sins laid out there.
Next, living to maximize your image in somebody else’s eyes. I have noticed many people-
Simone Collins: You mean to look good to other people?
Malcolm Collins: No
Simone Collins: Maximize your image. What does that mean?
Malcolm Collins: They build their heuristics for making decisions. We have an episode where we talk about Honza, who is an example of somebody who does [00:19:00] this, where we notice that this m- male thought leading influencer in, like, the red pill-ish diaspora community was basically saying when he was making major life decisions, like, what decision is the more mannish decision to make?
What decision is the more masculine decision to make? He is optimizing his major life decisions around fitting some image that he thinks is the image that he needs to be living. Not towards- Mm-hmm ... the effect that that image will have on society, not towards the effect that image is gonna have on other people, not towards anything that’s efficacious, but entirely based on an image.
Simone Collins: Right. So, okay, the, the, the distinction here is, is that it’s, it’s about an archetype, fitting an archetype, and that being really not, not cool. Yeah. Don’t live your life to try to fit an archetype, like the sexy woman, the desirable man, the tough guy, the, the saintly caretaker, if that’s just what you’re trying to satisfy without understanding the moral [00:20:00] fundamentals, the, the values that you’re working to serve.
Malcolm Collins: Yes.
So, and, and where this can become really dangerous for people who otherwise would frame themselves as good Christians is they attempt to fit the image of a good Christian. They abandon actual morality for a social role in maximizing that social role
Simone Collins: Okay, yeah
Malcolm Collins: This can be a big problem for like trad wives,
like, if it’s the self-image of a tradwife, if it’s the self-image of a tradhusband, if it’s the self-image of a good Christian woman, for example. And people can say, why is that a bad thing to do if it’s a positive self-image? And it’s because attempting to maximize positive self-images is something that can lead to immorality.
So let’s- Well,
Simone Collins: I think what’s worse is, like, let’s say that your goal is to serve God, and then the way you think you can moor to that is by [00:21:00] invoking in your mind the image of the most holy, saintly person, and if I just sort of cosplay maximally well as that caricature, then presumably I- I’ve got my bases covered.
The problem is then you will think that you are actually doing morally good things, when instead you are just putting on the costume of someone who does morally good things and congratulating yourself for it and, and assuming that it’s all working out just fine when it’s really not.
Malcolm Collins: Exactly. And, and to, to, to give examples of how this can, for example, destroy a marriage.
If one person is, rather than being a good wife because they want to serve humanity and society by serving their children and their husband, for example they can say, “Well, these are the strict roles and things that a tradwife is supposed to do, and you as a husband are supposed to make all of these things doable for me,” right?
And so then the family ends up in a scenario where they may, for a child’s medical bills, require a second [00:22:00] income or something like that. Mm-hmm. And the woman doesn’t end up doing that, and it causes the man bitterness, and then they end up fighting with each other. The woman doesn’t under- Like, the, the, the things that she’s doing aren’t even really appreciated by the husband.
Like, the reason you’re supposed to do all these tradwifey things are because it is for the behalf of the husband, right? Like, they, presumably they like these things. What if they don’t even value these things, right, and they would prefer you did something else that is difficult for you to do? Now it’s just completely wasted effort.
And waste-
Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s a really good point. What a lot of tradwife influencers are things that, like, women want to do for themselves and that men don’t really care about.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And, and wasted effort is inherently sinful because every amount of effort that you waste is time you could have spent on something else.
Mm-hmm. Here I guess I’ll just go into the next sin which is busywork busywork is as sin as doing something that is [00:23:00] directly immoral without societal externalities. Hmm. So I, I guess e- examples here, right? I think anything you do that’s, like, personally indulgent and doesn’t move society forwards is sinful because we see from Romans, Okay, so
Simone Collins: that could just be, like, doing a spa day instead of working toward something you value.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Anything you don’t do for God or anything you cannot say to be doing for God is a sin, and if God’s goal is the long-term flourishing of humanity, anything that’s not contributing to that is sinful. Now, we are all sinners. You shouldn’t expect to live a sinf- sinless life.
Simone Collins: Sure.
Malcolm Collins: However, many people confuse themselves and lie to themselves by acting as if they are doing something less sinful by doing pointless busywork than by doing something like playing video games or masturbating,
Simone Collins: right?
Well, yeah, I think something uniquely common in the United States, where you see a lot of performative suffering and performative exhaustion, is people... And actually, this, I think, happens a lot in Asia too, where you see, like, the six-day workweeks and people who work extra long, and the norms [00:24:00] of you can’t leave your office in Japan until your boss leaves, and your boss stays way long that, well, if you’re suffering and if you’re not happy and it’s really not fun, then you’re working really hard and you’re doing good things, when really, like, okay, great, you’re miserable and you’ve just wasted a ton of time.
And why-
Malcolm Collins: Like,
Simone Collins: that
Malcolm Collins: is- Yeah, why busywork is strictly a higher form of sin than- Hmm ... pure indulgence
Simone Collins: than- Yeah, like you should have just played a video game for- Yeah ... three hours that day, spent one hour actually doing meaningful work instead of being so sleep deprived and stressed out that you could only do 15 minutes of actually productive work that day.
Malcolm Collins: Exactly,
Simone Collins: because it lowers- Even though you’re in an office for, like, 12 hours ...
Malcolm Collins: it lowers your overall efficiency, right? Yeah. Like, at least f- forms of indulgence can help you stay sane- Yeah ... feel rewarded, feel motivated. Busywork does not do that, right?
Simone Collins: That’s a really good point.
Malcolm Collins: A- and so it is a worse sin and more of a sin to call out in your partner, in yourself than other forms of, of [00:25:00] sin.
It is, it is truly a- This is
Simone Collins: for sure my biggest, like, I, I struggle with this. It’s
Malcolm Collins: your biggest sin by far. Yeah. It’s your only sin, really. I don’t see you d- sin in any other way than busywork.
Simone Collins: Well, I think it’s... And but this is where I need advice on this sin is I feel like often I lack the judgment in really understanding where I should be putting my time and focus.
I mean, that’s
Malcolm Collins: my- I think that you know perfectly well when you’re doing something that doesn’t actually need to be done as frequently as you’re doing it, but you do it as an indulgence in the same way that I play video games as an indulgence because you feel that you won’t be able to hear yourself think, as you say, if you don’t do it.
The question is, are you on, being honest with yourself about how much of that busywork you need to do to hear yourself think and how much of it is just performative?
Simone Collins: Hmm.
So- Well, I guess what we do is I check in with you a lot. I should check in with you more on, like, help me balance this out and sanity check this.
And probably having a third party. It could be a person, ideally, you know, like your spouse or something, but it could [00:26:00] also probably be an AI- ... if you’re operating independently.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah,
Simone Collins: busywork. Just evaluating it. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Which I, which I... And one of the things was, like, that’s not in the Bible. Like, the Bible, they didn’t have busywork at the time of Jesus.
It just wasn’t a sin that he needed to warn people about, right?
Speaker 10: So Simone’s gonna mention a passage that could be taken to mean this, which I love that there are passages, and then in addition to that passage, you could also take the parable of talents from Matthew’s to be about this, or you could take Luke 10:38-42, Martha and Mary, to mean this. , And this is just really cool.
But, but, but you do actually see this in parts of the Bible with
but Martha was distracted with much serving, and she went to him and said, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone? To her then to help me.” But the Lord answered her, “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled by many things, but one thing is necessary. Marsha has chosen the good portion, [00:27:00] which cannot be taken away from her.”
But again, even if this is a parable against busy work, it’s often not in a salient context when I’m in like a church. Have I-- And I used to go to church every week. , Did I ever come away thinking, “Busy work is a sin. Gotta make sure not to do that”?
Simone Collins: No, I think the... There was a passage you read when we talked about societal morality about not suffering publicly.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, not suffering performatively.
Simone Collins: That is an extreme vice in the United States. Again, like bragging about sleep deprivation.
Malcolm Collins: Well, this is, this is not in the busy work category of sin. This is in the I’d say- No ... a plum sin.
Simone Collins: No, because people brag about the hours. They go, “Oh, I work 60-hour weeks, blah,
Malcolm Collins: blah, blah.” Right, but this isn’t, this isn’t that. This sin is very different. So this is the aplum sin which means not acting with aplum is sinful.
I’m sorry,
Simone Collins: we’ve moved on to a new one.
Malcolm Collins: Yes. Okay, [00:28:00] yeah. So this covers a number of emotional states which are adopted for purely indulgent reasons- Mm-hmm ... and don’t actually help you.
Simone Collins: Oh, like acting exasperated or-
Malcolm Collins: Yes ... snarky. You are taking on a negative emotional state- Uh-huh ... which causes negative externalities for everyone around you.
Mm-hmm. It causes your children, your spouse, your coworkers to be less happy, to be less productive. It causes you to be less happy and less productive, when at the end of the day, emotions are generally a choice. You can choose how you contextualize. You know, you get fired from a job, for example. You can say, “Oh, woe is me,” right?
Or you can say, “Oh, well, this is exciting. Now I get to try to look for something new. Now I get a change of pace. Now I get a new challenge.” And people are like, “Well, what if something truly bad happens? Like, what if Simone died,” right? Then it is extra upon me to not act with sadness and with grief.
Because if I do [00:29:00] that, who suffers? Who suffers from that?
The people who are going to suffer the most are going to be my kids, and they just lost a mom Okay?
Simone Collins: Yeah That- Do they also want to have a, an absent, emotionally ruined, angry, grieving, sad, bereft father? Like, you don’t wanna lose two parents, you know?
Malcolm Collins: The, the implication of this sin is proportional to the severity of the loss that you have undergone.
Right. It’s the severity, the time when you need to act with the most aplomb. And note this isn’t generic happiness aplomb. Th- this is, you know, acting with plucky continued diligence and move forwardness like a happy soldier. Those are the times when it is the bleakest for you. Yeah. When can you least afford to have self-pity is when you just got fired and have a family to support.
Simone Collins: Exactly.
Malcolm Collins: When can you least afford to act [00:30:00] with these other forms of indulgence, it is when you most feel them, right? And so don’t wait until something really bad happens to adopt this. And I’ve, I’ve noted here, I’ve watched some Mormon influencers, and they complain that Mormons are told to do this, right?
That they’re
Simone Collins: told- Oh, yeah. El- Alyssa Grenfell explicitly goes on about how it’s really messed up that there’s sort of a limited amount of grieving that is considered socially acceptable within the LDS church. And like per, like traditions and the way that funerals go and memorial services. Yeah, and it’s really interesting to hear her talk about that when w- we would see that as such a s- like a huge, huge sign of the church’s good taste.
There are other moral rules- Right ... that we’ve been talking about internally that we’re like, “Man, this backfired.” Like, they, they completely did this the wrong way. Like setting certain standards, either contemporarily or historically, that just are being completely misconstrued or have been outsized to [00:31:00] out- sorry, outsourced to outside authorities.
Like saying, “Oh, we don’t watch rated R movies,” but then having this completely unassociated non-Mormon body determine what the R rating is based on. You know? This is,
Malcolm Collins: this is actually where this, this today’s sort of tract because we, we don’t number the tracts anymore. Mm-hmm. This is technically a techno-puritan tract, but it’s applicable to all Christians or people more broadly came from, which is we were talking about the words of wisdom, which is where, like, don’t do this stuff is laid out by Joseph Smith.
And some of this is useful, like the be happy thing. Other of it is just wasteful. Like, don’t drink hot liquids, like coffee and stuff like that. Like, at the time, they thought that it had, like, negative health effects, but we now know that it doesn’t. It actually has positive health effects, and it’s been very well studied.
So it’s like, oh, like, we should have a techno-puritan words of wisdom. We should have something where I try to go through and future-proof these, so I can try to-
Simone Collins: Well, yeah, I don’t, I don’t know if it was negative health effects. M- it might have been that it was recognized that caffeine was addictive, or that it was- Right
un- an unnecessary expense That didn’t yield, you know, caloric [00:32:00] benefit. But for whatever reason, now even if, like, caffeine is the thing to be avoided which from a health perspective doesn’t make sense because it’s, it’s broadly seen as having health benefits on the aggregate aside from being addictive, though it is quite addictive.
Now you have all these Mormons drinking heavily caffeinated, often dirty sodas, you know, very high in calories, not helpful calories and, and not drinking coffee, like a zero calorie m- you know, moderately healthy drink if you don’t put a ton of stuff in it. It, it’s clearly something that’s not being optimally construed as a word of wisdom.
Malcolm Collins: Absolutely, yeah. So we’re like, “Let’s, let’s build these, but try to make them better and future-proof.” So also you guys can warn me if I ever do something in a track and you’re like, “That could have really long-term negative ramifications.”
Simone Collins: Yeah, we wanna know ...
Malcolm Collins: if, if the community becomes, like, really big and fanatic, ‘cause I always try to think, “How is a fanatic gonna operate on this,” right?
Mm-hmm. Like, if, if [00:33:00] somebody goes down that pathway 200 years from now, right? And that’s also why the tracks take so long to produce, is because I need to go through, you know, everything I’m saying and think, “How could a fanatic twist this?” But the happiest thing I just see is... And for people who aren’t aware of this, they can be like, “Well, isn’t it, like, a part it’s, like, useful to grieve?
It’s useful to experience negative things. It’s useful to experience anger and sadness.” And it’s like, it’s strictly not. Mm. We know from studies that, like, if you punch a wall when you’re angry, you have a harder time in the future controlling your anger. If you, if let yourself cry, like just have a cry when you’re sad, you’re going to cry at lower thresholds in the future.
The reason for this is when you stop yourself from these forms of emotional indulgence is you are activating the inhibitory pathway in your prefrontal cortex, which gets stronger with each activation. If you have not frequently activated it, you are incredibly susceptible to intrusive thoughts and intrusive emotional states.
Mm-hmm. Which [00:34:00] puts you... Like, it’s just, this isn’t even just a for your family thing, it’s just worse for you. Because presumably being sad or being stressed or going over about how hard you’re working these days I probably... Would you say I work harder than anyone you know, or in terms of
Simone Collins: like- yeah.
You absolutely work harder than anyone I know. You wake up at 2:00 AM in the morning to start working, and you work through every moment of the day that I ever see you. Like-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I mean, people could
Simone Collins: see- ... you might take an hour every day to chill, and I mean, th- this is also, like, it’s not that you have some kind of period where you’re unwinding while, like, making dinner, ‘cause I do that.
Like, you have almost zero wind-down time unless you’re, like, hauling out trash or hauling in groceries for the family. So- Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: So, but do you ever see me complain about how overworked I am or how
Simone Collins: stressed I am? No, never. Nev- Or- I’ve never heard you talk about being overworked.
Malcolm Collins: Whistle while you work, right?
I work with happiness. I work constantly and I work with happiness, and that’s an [00:35:00] easy thing to do. Because there is no moment in your entire life will you were- ever feel as good Is when you are s- suffering and sacrificing for a well-thought-through value system. Yeah. That is the greatest happiness that any human has access to, and the people who chase directly after hedonism- Mm
even when they have all of the resources they could ever want, as I’ve pointed out, they live the most tortured lives. Who are the people I have met who live the most tortured lives? They are the famous actors and actresses. Mm. You know, they’re, they, they have everything they want- For
Simone Collins: people who live pure lives of leisure it’s-
Malcolm Collins: All the fame-
very scary ... all the hedonism, all the sex, all the partners, all the respect, and yet they are mentally destroyed, and they often die of drug overdoses and stuff like that, and are seeing a thousand therapists, and are living states of mental terror. They are terrorized by their own mind because of this, because they went down a pathway that was not based on sacrificing through hard work and with a [00:36:00] plum for attempting to make the world better.
And when you see actors who clearly do live by that, you typically see them live very happy, fulfilled lives. Consider, like Mr. Rogers, for example. Like, he wasn’t like... He, he clearly had, like a moral value system, and he attempted- Yeah ... to push it through his show to advance human society. Mm. And you didn’t see him, like, get addicted to drugs and crash out in a, a parking lot somewhere, right?
We are rewarded for making these sacrifices and exhibiting this self-control, and you will be rewarded for fighting sin, even within this expanded category.
Speaker 5: So a lot of people, we did a video recently about people who did like gang bangs and the horror shows that their lives can descend into, and people wanted us to be like angrier or speak about them with more disgust. And it’s like this is-- Oh, it’s not something I’m drawn to. It’s not a sin that I’m tempted [00:37:00] by, thankfully.
, But in addition to that, like their lives compared to the lives that Simone and I and my kids live are literal hellscapes. Like I know some of these people and even my friends in this group, I know the mental torture they go through being like, “How am I gonna make this work?
How am I gonna have a family? How am I gonna...” And I want to help them, and I can offer them guidance, but there’s only so much I can do. And so I think, you know, when you see the end state of what happens to these people and what it’s like to be them, , it’s a lot harder to be-- to, to look at them with so much anger
When you accept that the additional rules that we live by are not arbitrary restrictions that make our lives harder and are just meant to make society a better place or something, but actively improve our own lives, it’s a lot harder to hate somebody for breaking those rules, for being a sinner.
Malcolm Collins: So next. Moral absolutism [00:38:00] is the next sin.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: This is allowing primitive- ... or overtly extreme signs of acting moral to override what is actually moral, right?
This is where the Vatican says, “Oh, just bring in endless immigrants-” “... because the Bible said you should feed foreigners and you should feed the poor, and so we’re gonna maximize that line out of context. And through that, we’re gonna bring in endless foreigners and- ... who cares what long-term impact this is gonna have on the people we’re bringing into the country, right?
Who cares what long-term impact- ... this is gonna have on their family when the citizens get pissed off and they decide to deport them and they have kids in the country- ... and all the kids are separated from their parents, and that all could’ve been avoided if you just hadn’t brought them in in the first place.
Or you leave them in the country and they end up overtaxing the social safety net, and then pensioners don’t get their pensions, and people who relied on Social Security in the country don’t get their Social Security and they starve to [00:39:00] death like there are negative externalities from this. And this sort of moral absolutism you see whether it’s coming from the Vatican, because it’s often very indulgent, right?
It is, it is moral hedonism as we’ve defined it. It’s saying, “Oh, I’m the good guy here,” right? Like, “I’m doing the good thing,” without considering the consequences. It’s saying I have some deontological... This is why I always crash out about the deontologists, because what deontology really does is push the cost of your moral purity onto outsiders.
When you say, “I won’t ever kill,” and then an intruder breaks into your house and rapes one of your kids because you wouldn’t fight back. And this, like functionally really happened when there, like pirates happened in in, around Philadelphia, and the Quakers wouldn’t, wouldn’t send forces
Simone Collins: to deal with them.
Oh, yeah. A long, historically,
Malcolm Collins: yes. And people were terrorized and brutalized because a- at the cost of their moral purity, right? That is functionally evil, right? Because, a- and they [00:40:00] are as responsible or more responsible for those atrocities than the pirates themselves.
Speaker 12: And there, there are ways of approaching
non-consequentialist frameworks that prevent the extremes, like Thomism, which I’m not particularly against. It just feels like a weasel out for me. It feels like a way of framing morality where you don’t have to deal with the potential extremes of either consequentialist or non-consequentialist world perspectives.
And I guess that’s good in that it doesn’t have the extreme negatives, but I also feel like it doesn’t accept the full moral weight that is important to accept of a moral framing. It just uses a bunch of rules to carve off the extremes
And the rules feel arbitrary and non-morally weighty to me. I think any real and good moral system is going to push you to positions that a normal person would be mortified by because I, I think real moral [00:41:00] conviction looks like that. It looks like something where other people say, “Oh my God, like, why?
Why, why are you doing this?” And it’s like this, this, then this. , If something removes through whatever amount of thing any choice that goes against a person’s intuitions, , I, I think it’s removing moral complexity
And I think we can see in the Bible that God’s clearly not a Thomist when he punishes someone like Saul for not killing literally everyone and their animals of the enemy tribe. That’s not within the bounds of Thomas ethics. Yes, self-defense is, but something like that isn’t
Malcolm Collins: Because they said and note here people had asked on a call, so I should lay this out here.
There are times when a group having these beliefs, these moral absolutist beliefs, exerts a negative externality on society and times when they don’t. And the difference between the two is whether or not they are power hungry and why they are exerting the moral absolutism. Mm. So a good [00:42:00] differentiation here is Amish pacifism does not exert an externality on society because Amish don’t seek power for themselves.
They almost never hold elected office, and they often don’t even vote unless they’re actively being victimized as they have been in the most recent few election cycles. Whereas Mur- Quakers disproportionately historically held positions of power. And so they’re able to say even though it’s not Quakers who the police would be intervening on behalf of, “Oh, don’t, don’t go do that.”
And we see this not just from the Vatican, we see this from wokes all the time, you know, with this- Mm ... this, “Oh, I’m doing the more moral thing,” because on a surface level it looks more moral and I’m just maximizing these surface level rules. Or we can even see it on a when people go and spam racism or antisemitism in ways that isn’t like, this is where we need to be asking some serious questions about Israel, but where they’re trying to show off, right?
This is a very smoothed brain thing to do because these are groups that we’re going to have to work with in the future, right? Like [00:43:00] clearly if you look at their fertility rate, their level of influence you’re going to need to find a way to work with places like Israel and the Jews long-term, whatever cultural group you are.
And there is a big difference between just spamming something like, “Oh, I’d go to war with them in a second if I could.” The dumbest thing America could, could do, but some conservative influencers have actually said that. I’m like, “You idiot.” Like, d- think about the long-term implications of that. Yeah.
Simone Collins: Not smart ...
Malcolm Collins: yeah, it’s, it’s extremely stupid. And you could, oh, even if you what, purged... W- what’s your real end game? Even if you purged every Jew, right? Do you know what happens when you purge every Jew from a country, right? They go to other countries. And do you know what those other countries do with those now angry Jews?
They build atomic weapons. That’s what we did, okay? When we look at leaders historically, what they have said is, “Yes, the Jews might be an outside group. Yes, they might not always be aligned with us, but there are ways that I can utilize that community for my long-term benefit,” [00:44:00] which we saw with people like Oliver Cromwell bringing the Jews back to England to better fight the expansion of Romanism.
And I think that that shows, like, whe- how, how to think about this stuff without, even if you have an outside group, even if you have a group that has at times victimized you is worth considering. Okay, with all of that being true, what’s actually the best long-term path going forward for me to signal?
Octavian Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: Next, inaccurate. Inaction is a massive sin in the modern age, and very, very important to note. It’s when you say, “I will do,” and this is the most common form of it, “I will do X thing after I’ve accomplished Y thing,” when Y thing is not a necessary prerequisite for X thing. This is very different from traditional sloth.
Mm-hmm. Because when you think about traditional sloth, you’re not doing it because [00:45:00] you’re lazy. Inaction is something like saying, “Well, once I have the right body, like once I’m skinny enough and hot enough-
Simone Collins: Mm. Mm-hmm ...
Malcolm Collins: then I’m gonna start dating.”
Simone Collins: Or, once I’m certain that no one’s going to make fun of me if I do this, or that I’m 100% certain that I’m right.
Like, we’re not certain about anything. We’re, we’re just trying to move in the least incorrect direction possible, but we believe that it’s sinful to not move forward at all. Mm. Whereas a lot of people are like, “Well, if I’m not absolutely certain that I can move forward in the morally perfect way, I’m not going to move forward.”
And we think that that is, that is worse.
Malcolm Collins: That is that PA form of inaction, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah. You know, even if we’re moving forward in, like, a slightly wrong direction, in the end we’re gonna be closer to the morally good thing than you are if you’ve not moved at all.
Malcolm Collins: If you are like, “But I don’t have the information yet,” right?
Like if you’re in a state like the one that’s going... Come up with what test do you need to run to get that information?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: [00:46:00] Not having enough information should never be a reason to not move forward anymore. If you’re a boss, you’ve had the employee who you come to them, you gave them a task, and they go, “Oh, sorry, I stopped like 20 minutes into the task when I realized I didn’t know how to do, like, stage two or something, or stage three.”
And you’re like, “What the f- is wrong with you,” right? Like genuinely I feel this way sometimes. I’m like, “You should have either immediately come to me when you stopped, right, and I would’ve told you what to do next, or figured it out.” But we are all- No,
Simone Collins: he’s talking about me. He’s, he’s just talking about me.
Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, you have done that a few times recently. Mm-hmm. I’m not... I actually wasn’t thinking of you, but it is
a-
Simone Collins: Yeah, you were. It’s okay ...
Malcolm Collins: massive because it, it’s something that you... I, I wasn’t. I was thinking of other employees. But you have done this a few times recently, and it’s a massive sin when done to yourself, because ultimately we’re all our own bosses.
And if you ever reach something and you’re just like, “I’m not sure,” then develop a heuristic for how you get to the next step when you’re not sure. It can be as simple as asking your favorite AI model.
Simone Collins: [00:47:00] Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Just go to your favorite AI model and say, or two out of three models. Go to Reality Fabricator that’s our AI site, and type in, “Hey, we have some that run, like, multiple models on a thing, X or Y, and it will run multiple models, and it’ll cross-check the answer for you for the best answer, right? Like, that’s a fun way to approach this, and you can do that, right? Like, we have the technology that you should never, ever be stuck on any question.
And this is where I’ve got annoyed at Simone when I, like, came back to her and I was like, “Okay, so where are you on X task?” And she’s like, “I got stuck at, like, stage three.” And I’m like, “Well, then go to an AI, right? Because I’m just gonna go to an AI when you kick this back to me, so why don’t you go to an AI, right?”
But oh well. This was on getting the RFAB component ready for Apple computers, which she had to do. Mm-hmm. And now it works, by the way, for Apple, for people who wanna use it for, like, coding on Apple and stuff.
Simone Collins: And to be fair, the, our third stage of doing this, I did finally get around to just doing that and not giving it back to you until it was done- [00:48:00] Yeah
no matter how many times it failed.
Malcolm Collins: But A- So ... but this is, and this is why I’m expanding the list of sins. This form of inaction is functionally as bad as sloth, and is more of a temptation for most people than sloth.
Simone Collins: Well, and, and again, like, it, I think the big theme that differentiates your sins is that you have this extra prejudice, justified, toward virtue signaling sins.
Well- Anything that, you know,
Malcolm Collins: people- The Bible had that in it. If you read the freaking New Testament like we did in the last chapter-
Simone Collins: Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: Jesus was like, “Yeah, make sure when you’re giving money, you don’t do it in a way that is overly performative. Make sure when you’re fasting, you don’t fast in a way where other people can tell that you’re fasting.”
Mm-hmm. “Because that’s overly performative. Make sure when you’re praying, you don’t do it in a way that’s overly performative, because that’s really bad.” Like, this is made cl- this is in the spirit of what’s listed out there. It’s just not explicitly listed out so people have-
Simone Collins: Well, yeah, [00:49:00] I think it’s maybe people missed it because it’s not so explicit.
It’s more just like, “Hey, don’t be flashy when you do, when you engage in self-deprivation or, like, active acts of piety.” It doesn’t have an explicit proactive prohibition on general virtue signaling.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: It’s just like, “Oh, when you do these things, be, be subtle about it.” Which of course, people miss that too, but this is a whole different level of stuff.
Malcolm Collins: Next sin, self-flagellation. This is when you are hard on yourself or allow yourself to experience negative emotions when in the past you acted either... It, there’s, there’s two types of self-flagellation, justified and unjustified self-flagellation. I think even justified self-flagellation is a sin, but we’ll get to how in a second, okay?
Mm. So if within any moment of your life you made a decision based on the information you had available [00:50:00] to you, and in a way that was directed towards long-term human flourishing or the good of the individual you were doing it for, like it could be how you’re raising your kids, how you’re treating your wife, anything like that, right?
And it leads to some negative outcome, right? To feel bad about that is enormously sinful, because it’s indulgence. It’s, it, it, now this is one of the hardest sins to avoid And just knowing that it is a sin, like just laying it out as a sin and talking about puritanism, I think will help people better categorize these emotions and compartmentalize these emotions so they do not overwhelm you, and the, the weighted emotion of them doesn’t overwhelm you.
But when, when is it actually justified to feel bad? When you acted in a way historically where you’ve had full access to information or with the information you had at the time, and you acted in a way that was not in accordance with that information or that was designed not [00:51:00] for long-term human flourishing, but for some personal benefit.
This is where, you know, you knew you probably shouldn’t have gotten that fancy car when finances were tight, but you really wanted to show off to people, so you got the car even though it had no functional utility to your family. And now your family’s suffering for that You have permission to take time to meditate on those past failings so you don’t do them in the future, but to not overindulge.
This should not be more than 10 minutes of emotion, okay? You need to move past this, and- Yeah ... since you have created a scenario for yourself, all you can do is move forwards. The only iteration of yourself that you can do good for are iterations of yourself that have yet to come to exist. And you are suffering or living a life of rewards for the actions of past iterations of yourself.
And this is how Simone [00:52:00] sees sort of actions. Like we’re a constantly changing and new person with every moment, with every second of the day, and you’re constantly paying it forward to the future you.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, and are you... Is, is this iteration of you that is acting right now, that you’re consciously experiencing going to be, going to go down in history as like a war criminal in your massive army of instances, or a hero that did something good, that moved you all in a good direction?
Yeah. You have a chance to be a hero. You have a chance to be, you know, a mutineer. What are you gonna do? And then
Malcolm Collins: the next one here is a fun one. The indulgence of sin. The indulgence- Whoa ... of sin is the sin of for no reason other than to test yourself or because you think you are honing yourself and making yourself stronger you needlessly expose yourself to temptation.
So an example of this would be... Now, this isn’t [00:53:00] normal, daily sorts of temptations. Like TV, erotic images, all of these things, they’re going to be all around you in modern society. You do have to be able to resist them to live a normal life, right? To not crash out. The people who crash out at the slightest exposure to one of these things, when people are like, “What if my kid sees X online?”
And I’m like, bro, if, if your kid loses it to like something that every kid is going to see within 10 minutes of opening the internet your kid’s probably in a pretty bad place in terms of how you structured their value system and the rules that you laid out for them. So, a- a good example of this for someone like myself could be you don’t have the same temptations that I have.
You don’t live with the same temptations that I live with. But naltrexone, an opioid agonist I take daily which prevents me from feeling my opioid pathways, which makes it much harder for addictive things to get their hooks into me. I could, if I wanted to, just be like... And, and some Christians are like this.
They’re like, “Oh, [00:54:00] don’t, you know, blunt yourself to the temptation,” right? Like, “That’s a bad thing.” And it’s like, why not? Like, when I have the technology to do this, I should do it. If a person knows that they heavily struggle with alcohol in a way that’s gonna cause them to die or something like that having a fully stocked liquor cabinet is not a moral necessity for them.
Yet in terms of the temptations that Christians expose themselves to, I have noticed some think it’s, like, cool or something to do this, right? It’s not cool. It leads to long-term negative consequences. The only types of exposure that you need to make sure you’re okay with is the types of exposure that you’re going to experience anyway.
And, and that can be tied to recreational sins that you’ve accepted. So an example of this can be, I believe playing video games is sinful in that it is an indulgence that doesn’t move human society forwards, but I [00:55:00] think I would, like, mentally break down if I didn’t have any recreational time.
So, and note I often play video games while I’m working. My normal way to play video games is while I have an episode running so that I’m editing it, right? You know, so I even try to do it, like, while I’m doing something else. Or when I watch anime, I’m often vibe coding, right? Like, I try to... But these are still sinful.
I could be more focused, for example.
Simone Collins: So I- That’s about balancing your efficacious pursuit of your values with whatever it is that keeps you happy and motivated and productive. And sometimes our long-term values when we pursue them are so abstracted and sort of built on delayed gratification that the bodies we’ve evolved to live in can’t really keep us motivated.
Like, we have to create mini games- Right ... to like, to trick our bodies into keep going.
Malcolm Collins: Video games are a sin that I’m like, I will take that sin because I know that it doesn’t like consume my entire life, right? Like video games and [00:56:00] anime do not consume my entire life and so I am able to engage with them in a way that I can’t engage with, for example, alcohol when I’m off naltrexone.
And I think many people can relate to pornography in this way. Some people can engage with pornography in a way that’s just totally like, oh, a once a week thing or something like that, right? Whereas other people it’s like, they see it and now it’s all they can think about, right? If you’re the type of person where you see it and now it’s all you can think about, maybe don’t put horny pictures of women all over your house, right?
Like, if you’re the type of person that struggles with gambling, maybe don’t live right next to a casino, right? , And as Luna’s pointed out, it’s gotten a lot harder with these online betting sites and stuff like that. I, I think of all of the sins of modern society, gambling is the worst. So be aware of that if you have it.
The reason why I think it’s the worst is it is one of the only sins that can destroy your life and the life of everyone around you in like 10 minutes. Very few sins even like a heroin addiction typically takes, I don’t know, six months or [00:57:00] something, right? Like, but gambling, that’s like just over.
Generational wealth can be gone. So it’s something that I think that people should never engage with. Gambling is one of those things where it’s one of the, the things where it’s like, “Okay, when I’m choosing the sins that I choose to indulge in, which one should I just not do?” Gambling is like the easiest one.
Okay?
Speaker 6: One I’d add here that actually came from a recent episode when, , I was talking to Simone and we were like, “Well, they didn’t even end up enjoying the gang bang that they went to.” And she goes, “Well, you know, maybe they went just to see if they would like going.” And I said, “But I don’t wanna know whether or not I like gang bangs.”
Like, I can tell as an outsider I don’t. I do not like seeing other men naked, , or having... It’s eh. But if, if I was genuinely uncertain, I still would not want to know because even if I was a completely indulgent person who just, you know, did things like gang bangs recreationally, they still take a lot of effort, carry a lot of risk, everything like that.
And so I think we should [00:58:00] also just outline as a sin going out and doing something just to see if you like it when
It would be a net negative to your life to find out you like that thing. , This includes things like skydiving, free climbing, gang bangs, , gambling is an easy one here. N- you know, never be like, “Oh, well, I went to gamble to see if I enjoyed it.” You know, “I tried heroin to see if I enjoyed it.” Just don’t do it
Malcolm Collins: Next, empty words. So empty words, the sin of empty words, is when a person is trying to engage, or you’re trying to engage, because sins, our own sins are the ones that matter the most. When you’re trying to engage somebody else in c- a conversation that doesn’t either entertain them or move their ideas forwards or share information with them, or develop your and their understanding of the world, morality, science, et cetera.
All [00:59:00] conversations and all words should have some purpose. Now, it could be to make them happy. It could be a joke or something like that. But when you come to somebody and you say something like, “Here are the things I did today,” and that’s not relevant to them, you have stolen a portion of their, their life.
You have fracturally murdered that person. Worse are empty words that are designed to try to bring another person down to your negative emotional state. This is like compounding, where you come to a person and you tell them about something negative that happened to you to try to pass on- Like venting,
Simone Collins: complaining, trauma dumping
Malcolm Collins: All of that is horrible, a horrible sin.
You are trying to offload your trauma, your pain to another person. You can say, “Well, what if you need to talk about a trauma to get over it?” It’s like, you don’t need to. If you just don’t contextualize it as traumatic, the studies have shown you won’t experience it as traumatic. We always talk about this study, but there’s a famous study where they looked over people’s [01:00:00] experiences of trauma in youth, and they correlated their stated experiences of trauma in youth correlated with their negative behavioral patterns as an adult, their m- mental stress as an adult, everything like that.
But when they went over the court records to see who really experienced trauma and who didn’t, completely dis-correlated from anything as an adult. People who experienced demonstrable trauma, like I would be someone like that. If you look at my childhood, it was horrifying. Like we’re actually talking with a, a, a team that’s like doing research on us, and I’m going through my childhood, and they were like, “Wait, that sounds horr- f- like why aren’t you more focused on that as a traumatic event?”
And I say, “Because how does that help me to be?” There would be a pure negative externality to everyone around me Next. And, and this is a big one, and I really encourage people to, one, look for it in themselves and look for it in their partners, right? If you, if you’re in a techno-puritan relationship, work on this, right?
Next, unnecessary status signaling. Easy, I [01:01:00] probably shouldn’t even need to say it but all status signaling is sinful, right? Except for when it is necessary for, like, a job or something like that. And be very careful you don’t use lies about what you say is necessary to indulge in status signaling that isn’t actually necessary.
You, for almost no job do you actually need anything other than a bare bones car, right? For example. And yet many people buy... And, and a used bare bones car. Will buy fancy things that they simply do not need. In the same category as status signaling is the sin of in-group signaling. This is signaling how punk you are, how goth you are, how whatever in-group you want to accept you.
Even how techno-puritan you are to other techno-puritans. It is when you engage in this signaling in a way that hurts your long-term goals and ability to affect society. So an example might be a face tattoo or something like that. Even if there was a techno-puritan [01:02:00] face tattoo you could get, it would be strictly sinful to get it because it would lower your efficaciousness in society
Speaker: I talked it over with Simone to think if there’s any sins that we’re missing here, and we came up with a few more. First is the sin of entitlement. This is to believe that you are owed anything by either other people or reality itself. Be that dignity, a good life, healthcare, being treated with respect.
No one is owed anything, and to believe you are is a grave sin. Second is the sin of indulgent nostalgia. This is allowing nostalgia to indulge rumoration rather than focusing on trying to recreate those sorts of experiences for the next generation in which case it can be good.
The final is rumination more broadly, just the sin of rumoration. This is overly [01:03:00] focusing or giving weight to any emotion that you are feeling that you didn’t choose to feel. This, like as Simone put it when we were walking this morning, she goes, “Today people will be like, ‘I’m sad. That means I should do something about it.
I should take pills or something,’ when really it’s just not particularly relevant how you feel. It’s usually not particularly relevant to what you need to accomplish or what you need to do
The final one I’d include here is one of the biggest potential sins, is risking a human’s life for happiness or a thrill or for some emotional subset. , This could be, you know, recreational sex is one thing that could cause a human life to come into existence, and then you feel put in a position where abortion makes sense to you.
But this also includes things like skydiving, bungee jumping, free climbing, anything where you are putting your own life at risk meaninglessly for just a thrill
Malcolm Collins: Next, corrupted [01:04:00] mercy.
And this is the biggest, and we can get to this another day because it goes long, this section. We’re gonna be talking about the Bible in a place where I’m just gonna say the Bible needs to be updated on this point. There are many places in the Bible where it explicitly says “Give food to the poor.
Yes, even foreigners. Yes, don’t let that trouble you.” And I think that that made sense morally as we talk about, like, things in the Bible, the Bible in the past said, “Sell your daughter. This is how you sell your daughter into sex slavery. This is how, you know, you treat your slaves. This is h- how- how you act when you conquer a people and have to slaughter all their infants,” right?
You know, all of those things, right? Those th- those parts of biblical morality have changed as society has changed,
Speaker 13: And this isn’t because the underlying morality of the Bible has changed. The goals of all of these have always been the same. The iterative change to human civilization they’ve made have always been the [01:05:00] same. , But it’s because humanity and the way that we live has changed, and that has changed the rules that are best to live by to live a virtuous life within the social norms of your era
Malcolm Collins: and I think that this is one area where we need to look at what’s in the Bible, and I’d actually say we... There’s no way around this. There’s no linguistic way around this. We just need to accept that in the time of Jesus and in the time of the Old Testaments, there was not enough charity in the world to the extent that people were suffering, and so the Bible had to signal boost charity.
But today, we live in a time where charity has reached such an extreme that it is leading to more aggregate suffering. Oh. And we will get to that next. Oh, that might actually make a whole other tract. We’ll do a whole other tract on that.
Simone Collins: Oh, that’s a good idea. Well, useful stuff. We need to write this down in,
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, he can try it for an hour now. Won’t that be fun?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: I, I mean, remember, while the Bible tells you to be merciful, it also says, “Be merciful just as your father is merciful.” [01:06:00] And keep in mind that God did punish a guy by taking away his title as king because he didn’t kill literally everyone in a settlement, even though he did kill all the babies.
He did that part. Didn’t kill everyone. So, whatever is meant by mercy here is not the standard definition of mercy, and that’s worth meditating on as we go into this next section. Love ya, Simone.
Simone Collins: I love you, too
Speaker 16: What do you think? Look, a dinosaur. It’s a dinosaur. Are the kids going to survive? I don’t know. What is gonna happen, Indy?
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
Is Vatican II the result of a “gay Jew infiltrating the Catholic Church”? Malcolm and Simone Collins dive deep into the shocking story of Gregory Baum — a matrilineal Jew, former Catholic priest, and openly gay man who authored the first draft of Nostra Aetate, one of the most controversial documents of the Second Vatican Council.
In this episode, they explore:
• Baum’s background, conversion, active homosexuality while writing key Church documents, and later life
• The content and lasting impact of Nostra Aetate on Catholic teaching regarding Jews, other religions, and interfaith dialogue
• Why many traditional Catholics view Vatican II with deep suspicion
• The broader implications for Church authority, doctrine, and demographics
A wild, uncomfortable, and thought-provoking discussion on faith, identity, institutional capture, and theology. What do you think — infiltration, urban monoculture influence, or something else?
Watch until the end for Malcolm & Simone’s unfiltered reactions.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. If you clicked on this video and are wondering, is this a clickbait title? It is so much crazier than you think, right? So I saw a title going through on a Redeem Zoomer video. We’ve had him on the show. I think he’s a great content creator, but he’s a pretty small C conservative content creator.
Doesn’t really lean into c- clickbait. Generally tries to dig into the meat and bones of religious history, Christian history, and theology. And it was the, the gay Jew who infiltrated Catholicism or the Vatican or something like that. Anyway, I read this and I was like, “Wh- this isn’t normal Redeem Zoomer content,” right?
It mu- it can’t possibly be true, Malcolm. I start listening to the video. I get to the end of it and I’m like, “Oh, my God, I have to know more.” So I need to clarify a few things about this particular individual and the influence they have had on Catholicism. [00:01:00] First of all is this somebody who was just, like, same sex attracted or, you know, not, not actually sleeping with men?
Or maybe they, long after writing the documents that became important parts of Vatican II Nostra A- aetera m- they, they maybe long after had gay sex or started doing gay activism or something like that. They were, while they were a priest, during the time period they wrote these documents, having active gay sex with men Yeah and
Simone Collins (2): then it’s like- Wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, hold, hold on.
You, how can you be a Catholic priest and a, I mean, I guess you could be a ma- a matrilineal Jew And that’s the other, right, so here’s
Malcolm Collins: another thing. I was like, maybe they’re just ethnically Jewish or something like that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. No, they’re probably not actually a
Simone Collins (2): Jew. They’re just matrilineally, ooh, matrilineally Jewish, and that’s it, right?
Yeah, so- And then that would be-
Malcolm Collins: He is, by the way, matrilineally [00:02:00] Jewish. His, one of the things he fought hardest to normalize within the Vatican and Catholicism as a policy is that it is immoral to attempt to proselytize to and convert Jews to Christianity. Does that sound a lot like somebody who actually deconverted from Judaism?
That makes no sense if you actually believe Christian principles, right? Like, you would... I’m, I’m saying this, I’m trying to be, like, as... I have, I have tackled this particular conundrum every way I can in my head, and the only way, because then, like, wouldn’t he convert back to Judaism?
But the only way I can get it to make sense when I piece together his various writings, and then it does make sense, is he thinks that, that the [00:03:00] Jews are still under the first covenant. And that as such, you can have a b- believe that the Jewish worldview is both 100% correct and accurate, and the Christian worldview is simultaneously 100% correct and accurate. Because the first covenant stands and you have the second covenant. And so he basically, I mean, if this is true, it means that he 100% believed in, even if he was telling the truth about being a Catholic, Catholicism and Judaism.
Or a form of Catholicism that’s heavily different from other forms of Catholicism, because now we’re gonna get to, what did he write? So he wrote Nostra Aetate. This is an official declaration of the Second Vatican Council. It was overwhelmingly approved with a final vote of 2,021 in favor and only 88 against, and it was promulgated or officially issued by Pope Paul VI on October [00:04:00] 28th, 1965.
What that means in terms of Catholic doctrine is that’s not the same thing as a papal bull, right? Like, it doesn’t mean that it directly came from God. But what it does mean, according to the catechism of the Catholic Church, or, like, their official documents about what all Catholics have to do, is Catholics, quote-unquote, “owe it religious assent or a sincere submission of intellect and will.”
See CCC 892 to 893. It is not optional. And I will read through that, the, like, official Catholic doctrine on these types of policies. But what it said and what it introduced to Catholicism as a concept is that other religions, including religions outside of the Abrahamic tree, like Hinduism and Buddhism, have a ray of divine truth to them.
And it’s even written ... It can be interpreted, like now, [00:05:00] after I went over this document, I understand now why so many of our Catholic friends hate Vatican II. ‘Cause I’m reading this and I’m like, “Whoazers.” Like, this is pretty wild. And it, it goes through and sort of praises things about other major religions and sort of creates commandments, essentially, for Catholics around getting along with them rather than necessarily trying to convert them.
That’s crazy. Very
convenient if a Jew had entered the, the, the Catholic Church. Okay. By the way, other final crazy thing is he also deconverted- Oh ... from
Simone Collins (2): Catholicism. So he, like, came in, vandalized church policy, and then- Vandalized church
Malcolm Collins: policy in a very d- and note, when I say he wrote the Nostra E- Eleata this document- It’s not like he co-wrote it or something like that.
He wrote the entirety, as far as church history and anyone is aware- Okay ... of the first [00:06:00] draft of this document. How- Yes, it was heavily edited after its first draft and before it entered the sort of church law and stuff like that. And actually, it seemed to have gotten even worse in future edits. In his original writing of it, it was really just focused on Jews and Christians getting along and Judaism being partially true.
Okay. And all of the, like, Hinduism and Buddhism stuff was added by other people afterwards. Oh, wow. So, like the his, his group of buddies- It was the ‘60s. It was the time. Yeah but the reason he left was also crazy. So within the church and during his time in the church, he was a well-known LGBT activist.
Oh. And he left the church, and we’ll go into that because as he said the, the, the, the church’s stance on gays. Which is odd because one he... If- he was a priest. He’s not, in C- Catholic terms at least, it’s, that, that doesn’t [00:07:00] just mean you can’t sleep with women. You can’t sleep with anyone as a Catholic priest.
Yeah. Right? Like- Yeah ... their stance on gays had nothing to do with the fact that he couldn’t sleep with men. Yeah, it’s, it’s about
Simone Collins (2): celibacy. It’s not about selective celibacy.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, although he was doing that anyway. Well. He ends up, by the way, long-term dating another Catholic priest who is gay or former Catholic priest who is gay.
Simone Collins (2): Oh, I just, no, I just want the yaoi manga version of this. After leaving- It sounds fantastic.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Y- you know how G- oh, you wanna get even more manga? Do you know who he’s married to today?
Simone Collins (2): Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Malcolm Collins: I don’t know. Who? What? An ex-Catholic nun.
Simone Collins (2): God, you said that and my, my computer just, like, demonically shut off. It, it was like- ... it wasn’t used to process that. No, it was
Malcolm Collins: an
ex-Catholic nun who he’s married to now. Oh my. Well,
Simone Collins (2): a very
Malcolm Collins: mannish
Simone Collins (2): nun perhaps.
Malcolm Collins: No, no. They don’t have any [00:08:00] sexual relationship. I think it’s so that he can more easily have both a long-term pr- relationship, which is something he’s always wanted, and practice casual sex with gay men in, in potentially large numbers.
So okay. I’ve set the scene, I think. This is absolutely crazy. I now understand why, like, all of the sane Catholics who, like, are, are our friends are all like, “Yeah, I’m not, like, a big fan of Vatican II. That... Some w- some fishy stuff went on with that,” right? And l- let’s, let’s just go into this, okay?
‘Cause it gets... , so he knew he was attracted to men in his teenage years but remained celibate during his time as a priest. Ordained in the 1950s, left the priesthood in 1974. A- and note his conversion into Catholicism is also pretty fishy. So we’ll get into that as well. In his 2016 autobiography, The Oil Has Not Run Dry, he publicly came out. He described falling in love with men [00:09:00] emotionally in his younger years. The joy mixed with pain because it couldn’t be reciprocated due to his vows. His first gay experience was at the age of 40 around 1963. This was around the age that he wrote this document which he described as exciting but ultimately disappointing because he wanted a committed partner.
After leaving the priesthood, he married Shirley Flynn, a former nun, in 1978. They lived together platonically until her death in 2007. He described continuing to explore his sexuality in other, quote-unquote, “non-conformist ways.” In 8- 1986 after moving to Montreal, he fell in love with a former priest, a male partner, and remained committed to that relationship.
Now, this is also pretty interesting because that’s a huge age gap relationship there
Simone Collins (2): on the bright side, I mean, we’ve got gay romance, we got the costumes, we got the age gap. This is just perfect manga [00:10:00] fodder for some kind of priest yaoi series.
So- Yeah, this is- At
Malcolm Collins: least there’s that ... this is one of the things where if you come to the conclusion that I do in this and, and you’re watching this, that he just never stopped being Jewish I’m not getting the Jewishness in any of this, though. I... Where is, where
Simone Collins (2): is the Jew coming in? We haven’t, we haven’t gotten to that yet.
Okay. Because I, I’m not... None of this feels like someone who’s very Jewish. It just, it just feels like someone who’s kind of trolling the church,
Malcolm Collins: having fun. But if you, if you... No, suppose you are an actual Jew, right? Now- Okay ... keep in mind, Jews aren’t supposed to be gay either, so, like, he’s not good at being a Jew in that
Simone Collins (2): respect.
Well, like, again, to my point. Now, this doesn’t sound like a Jew. This sounds like m- maybe someone a little bit ur- ur- early urban monoculture or someone very 1960s-ish, just like, “Free love. Everything is real. God comes in many forms.” That kind of person. [00:11:00] There’s nothing particularly Jewish about that.
That has to do with a loss of culture, a loss of tradition. Mm-hmm
Malcolm Collins: No, but imagine you’re, you’re Jewish, right? Even a bad Jew. I, I, I still think even as a bad Jew, even with that level of sin- God, Jew ... this is one of those, like, sneak stat things where I often joke that, that Jews are just specced into, like, way too high a sneak stat.
They, they, it’s not just they come off as sneaky, it’s the fact that, that Mossad has been able to pull off these insane things like getting terrorists to pay them for pagers to blow- I love that,
Simone Collins (2): yeah. And most recently there’s been this big scare with Mossad being a little bit too socially connected with a lot of high-ranking Trump officials, and they’re sending all this intel back on what internally the US government is talking about vis-a-vis the Iran war.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but imagine the civilization level sneak stat that is to sneak your way into- Into everything ... the core council which decides [00:12:00] what is religiously true for Catholics.
Simone Collins (2): Okay, okay. So he’s, he’s Mossad-ing the Catholic Church is what you’re trying to say. Infecting
Malcolm Collins: it with documentation that says you’re not allowed to go against the Jews.
That’s not even, like... That’s not even, like... I’m just like, “
Simone Collins (2): Damn.” Really? Isn’t that just, isn’t that what he wrote more just, like, let’s try to be more cooperative and kind vis-a-vis other religions? Or is it- no,
Malcolm Collins: it basically affirms Judaism is, is partially true and worshiping the same god. Well, it is the sa- I mean, they, they share the Old Testament.
Yeah, but m- most Catholics before Vatican II did not think Jews were worshiping the same god. That is... E- even the concept of that is really a post-Vatican II concept. Well, Jews worship
Simone Collins (2): the God of the Old Testament and
Malcolm Collins: Christians worship the God of the Old Testament. I know that makes sense to you as a techno-puritan because we believe the same thing.
Okay. I am just saying that most Christians don’t believe that. [00:13:00] They do believe- I guess someone’s
Simone Collins (2): gonna explain this to me in the comments, so yeah. Okay. Fine. I’ll take, I’ll take your word for it and then go to the comments.
Speaker: So I decided to look more into this to see how popes after it was out related to it, and it looks like they’ve just built on it since then. , You have Pope Paul VI, who was the one who
, Put the whatever on it, the, the, the seal on it. Then you’ve got Pope John Paul II, who frequently referenced and built upon it. Examples include addresses at an anniversary, specifically his 20th address in 1985, his 1986 visit to the Rome Synagogue, and multiple statements on Jewish-Christian relations.
Um, then you have , Pope Benedict XVI, who wrote a letter for the 40th anniversary in 2005, praising it for opening a new era. So he explicitly praised it in relation with Jews and overcoming prejudices. As both cardinal and pope, he affirmed its role while noting some limitations, e.g.
[00:14:00] it focuses positively on religion, but should address the sick and distorted forms of those religions. Okay, whatever. , Pope Francis marked the 50th anniversary, 2015, in a general audience, calling the message, quote unquote, “always timely,” and quoting sections on Judaism and Islam, and emphasized practical dialogue, friendship, and cooperation in the document.
Then we have Pope Leo XIV, who recently gave an address to a general audience for the 60th anniversary, highlighting its ongoing urgency for Jewish-Catholic relationships. So, , what I’ll note here is, yes, none of these are like papal bulls or anything like that, but for half a century at this point, well over half a century at this point, , every single pope has reaffirmed and built on this document.
, This inception was deep and thorough
Malcolm Collins: It looks like the age gap might’ve been around, like, 25 years for one of his relationships. Ooh.
Simone Collins: Well, I mean, you know, they’re very common these [00:15:00] days, so.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So we’ll start with his sexuality stuff, then we’ll get into the Jew stuff.
But that is, that is fas- ... And it makes me understand more why we see so many of the Catholics who do not think the church is, is, as it exists right now, is something that they can follow.
Mm.
And they’ve gone for other versions or sort of past iterations of what the church taught. And it’s always fascinating to me that they don’t consider themselves schismatic.
Although, what’s really funny is a lot of the, like, most famous schismatics, like Martin Luther, also didn’t want to consider themselves a schismatic.
Speaker 22: Other individuals who didn’t consider themselves schismatic were John Calvin and
Henry VIII and John Wycliffe. I personally don’t understand this. You know, now that Protestantism is large, maybe it’s just twisted my brain on this issue,
Malcolm Collins: So, like, th- that’s just a common thing that happens to people, where you have this sort of trans-schismatic take, where it’s like, “I don’t define myself as schismatic, and I’m just looking at the guy in a wig.”
And I’m like, “But [00:16:00] you’re, you’re clearly just a guy in a wig,” right? Like, you’re ignoring the church’s teachings, right? You know, that seems ... But anyway, to continue here. And, and I think that at the end of the day, whether or not you’re schismatic or not does actually come from whether or not you define yourself as schismatic.
I actually buy into the, the trend thing of schism- schismatism, because you at the end of the day get to decide, you know, what your heart thinks, right? So even if I as an outsider would be like, “This looks schismatic to me,” they as, those insiders wouldn’t, right? So to continue there. He knew he was attracted to men in his teenage years but remained celibate during that time as a priest, and he used priesthood to sort of, this was part of what seemed to motivate him to become a priest, the ability to live a celibate lifestyle and, and not be drawn to this. In his 2016 autobiography, The Oil Has Not Run Dry, so keep in mind this stuff about who he’s sleeping with and when he’s sleeping with them is not coming from outside hostile sources.
This is from his own mouth. Talk about this. Oh, sorry, we just ... Wait, wait, did we just go through [00:17:00] this? Yeah, we went through his first sexual experience and stuff like that. He described wanting to explore se- his, his sexuality in non-conformist ways. So anyway, th- this is where it gets interesting, right?
So, remember I mentioned wh- when his sexual experience was, right? So, that would’ve happened when he was 40 years old, okay? Oh. So the document by the pope, right? With officially promulgated, that means this is when the pope, you know, basically affirmed this document, when he was 42 years old.
He apparently wrote the first draft of the document when he was 38 years old, and would have been working on the inter-drafting process during this time when he was having se- gay, gay sex.
Right? Mm.
So to get some quotes from him “Looking back, I begin to realize my vow of celibacy had not been a meaningful religious commitment, but simply a promise to bracket my homosexuality, to refuse to [00:18:00] explore its meaning and power.”
He decided to leave the priesthood since, quote, “Since I no longer agreed with the church’s official sexual ethics and was exploring my sexuality in non-conformist ways.” Oh, no. A- again, wait, you left the church to explore your sexuality in non-conformist ways? My brother, straight men don’t get to do that either.
Like, the level of this guy’s commitment to the church, not high. You know? That is
Simone Collins (2): a little... Yeah. Ugh.
Malcolm Collins: And this is actually something really weird about Catholicism that I’m beginning to notice. And I notice this from his writings on Catholicism, the way he re- relates to Catholic theology, is a lot of people who are at, like, controlling levels within the Catholic Church and Catholic religious orders are significantly less religiously faithful than I’d say, like, the average lay Catholic that I know.
Mm. And that’s been very, very surprising to [00:19:00] me. And I- Well,
Simone Collins (2): there’s also such this... It is a little something that I struggle with with the c- the Catholic Church is the lifestyle, the day, just the day-to-day routine of someone who is in the clergy is so different from the day-to-day routine of a layperson who’s really deeply engaged in all the sacraments, right?
‘Cause you’re looking at one life that has possibly a lot of solitude, you know, a lot of sort of communal living sort of like a university style living if you are, you know, in a group, or more isolated living, very independent. Versus, you know, a teeming family, lots of young kids running around, lots of...
I mean, obviously priests work closely with their community too. It’s just, it, it worries me that... And what I like about the LDS church, for example, is that the people who are involved in policy are people who are, they came from the church. They raised families. They, they’ve done the whole thing. They’re living the LDS life, or they lived the [00:20:00] LDS life and now they’re older and senior and, and now influencing it and trying to make it sustainable and good, presumably.
Yeah. But if you’re a Catholic priest, you’ve never done that. Like, you haven’t had the family. You haven’t raised the kids. You don’t know the challenges of raising a kid in the church in the modern day. Well, then why
Malcolm Collins: do you think, like, Catholics have such low fertility rates when contrasted with other groups?
Simone Collins (2): I mean, it’s, it can’t help. There, there are so many factors, but yeah. I, it... So when, when you say, you know, you, you don’t see such great adherence from The clergy, well, can you be surprised when the clergy don’t really live the life of the layperson? They can’t, because they can’t be married. They can’t have kids.
They can’t raise children within the church. Yeah, but is it- They instead... It’s kind of like how, something I’ve noticed, and this, like in a very different world, there’s a lot of childless women who worked as nannies or as teachers. Mm. And they’re like, “Well,” you know. And they, they sort of act like they know really well.
Like, “I know how a child should be raised. I know [00:21:00] all these things.” But they, they never really have lived it, right? They’ve only been, like, paid staff who work with children under certain conditions. But they don’t know the full experience of it, and then they’re very judgmental around, like, parents and parenting and how a child should be raised, even though they don’t know what it’s like to be on the hook 24/7.
And I think there might be a similar dynamic that takes place with, like, a full-time clergy who’s not allowed to engage in the sacrament of having kids and getting married because they’re viewing it from a limited perspective that makes them think like they fully understand the experience when they really can’t.
Does that
Malcolm Collins: make sense? Well, it’s also one of the things that was increasingly clear to me as I studied this guy’s life is he seemed to do very little for, like, actually... Like, if you look at his writings and stuff like that they predominantly seem tied to gay activism, right? Like- Mm ... it almost seems like he was living off of Catholic tithings while spending his day and nights promoting, like, because he just had, you know, you have time to think in free time when you’re doing something like this [00:22:00] promoting gay stuff.
Hmm.
And that seems to be a, a big way that, like, the, the sort of gayness became more normalized within the church was specifically downstream of him. But to continue here. And, and gayness is super normalized in the Catholic Church to the extent that we’ve pointed out, there’s even an article on, like, the gayness of Catholic priests where it’s argued between 25, from surveys, 25 and 50% of gay, Catholic priests are same-sex attracted.
Which isn’t a, a ding on them. I mean, we often say this is actually kind of a, an ethical way for society to deal with same-sex attraction. Absolutely. If it, if, if you know, it’s saying you can’t participate in it, you know, at least use these people like ethically sourced eunuchs so you can get people without as much nepotism to have positions of authority within your religious institutions, right?
Like, but that’s also gonna make them, like, way more open to these ideas and in an environment where people are skirting around these ideas. And I think that this might be where the normalization- Mm ... especially in the heart of the [00:23:00] Catholic Church, of trying to cover up the child, the ev- everybody knows what scandal I’m talking about.
I guess I’ll put a line from South Park here.
Speaker 2: Why would he put anything in your butts? We don’t know. That’s what we’re trying to figure out. Hmm.
Hmm. Hello there, children. Chef, why would a priest want to stick up my butt? Goodbye.
Speaker 7: Now I want to be clear that the Catholic institution, , was committing these SA attempts at lower rates than other large institutions like the US public school system, , by pretty significant margins. , But that doesn’t explain why they tried to cover it up, like up to the highest levels of the church, and put people in positions where they could continue to do this even after the coverup.
Like, if you’re gonna do a coverup for reputation, at least keep the people away from kids afterwards
Speaker 23: It was almost as if, or at least in terms of how they were acting, that they thought the mere fact that people were [00:24:00] upset , at them for sleeping with children was the problem. , And I think we even see how the sentiment could potentially arrive through individuals like Milo Yiannopoulos, where he originally said that this was like a sexual awakening for him, , when a, a priest, , hooked up with him as a kid.
, And that others may feel that way as well, and like the outside world just doesn’t understand. It’s, I don’t know, one potential perspective?
Speaker 24: Like, okay, so bear with me here, but suppose you’re like Milo, and you were molested as a young person, but you felt it very affirming for whatever reason, Stockholm Syndrome, whatever, or even j- you actually did feel it affirming. It was like an important awakening for you. And then other, you see other people doing the same thing to other children, and you then, , see them being punished for it, and you would think, “Oh, well this doesn’t make sense.”
Look, just, I as an outsider am trying to find any logical reason why a good [00:25:00] person would do this, and maybe Catholics can chime in and explain why they think that the church may have been covering this up in the way that they were covering it up, where it allowed the people who were doing it to keep doing it
Speaker 16: This year, we’re taking the boys on a weekend boat trip to discuss Jesus’ role as the navigator of our lives. That sounds pretty fun.
Speaker 17: A Catholic boat trip?
Speaker 18: The Catholic boat’s gonna be heading on out today. The Catholic boat, get some hot Christian action that’ll take you-
Malcolm Collins: but uh
The, the, it’s always really perplexed me, like why did they not, why, why were they trying to protect these priests, right? When, when they were like moving around the priests that they knew were the issues instead of dealing with them. Like it- I, I always thought like there must be some form of normalization that [00:26:00] I’m not aware of.
Then I read this guy’s writings in daily life and I’m like, “Oh, if there are a bunch of priests like this guy, that explains it.” There, there’s basically a What do you call it? A gay cult that has infiltrated the upper rings of the Catholic Church, the Vatican, right? Like,
Speaker 4: No, to keep their mouths shut. Right. Yep. Right. And so... W- wait a minute. What? Yes, but we’ve got to find out why these children are suddenly finding it necessary to report that they’re being molested. Stop the problem at its source. Yes
Malcolm Collins: what, that’s, that’s what. Yeah, everyone he’s married to and having sex with after he left was a former priest.
Mm.
Simone Collins (2): It doesn’t look great that that happened, yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins (2): And- Or, or it just means that when people realize they can’t adhere to the values and rules of the church, they leave, which could be a sign that those who remain are being pretty good. I don’t, I’m, I don’t know, just maybe, maybe. Right? That could be...
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So, and note here, this episode, people might be like, “Malcolm, like, this seems [00:27:00] like an area where you could really dunk on Catholicism. Like, why aren’t you taking the shots here, bro? Like, we all know you want to.” And this is one of those, oh, no, no, no, no, no. Like, this is too bad even for me. Like, I’m like, I feel bad about this.
I would like, learning this history, it wasn’t like... It was almost like a curse to knowledge for me because like, oh. Like, this is, this is not fun to know happened to your religion, right? Like, this is, this is too much of a, this is like, you know, you don’t like the other team, but then you see them do so bad in a particular game that they just get completely owned.
Mm ... and they’re, they’re walking off the field and you’re just like, “I’m, I’m, I’m sorry that happened to you guys. That was painful to watch.” Which is what learning the story of this guy has been in terms of, like, my thoughts on the Vatican.
Mm.
But to continue here a- and note here, I’m not saying this ‘cause I’m anti-Jewish or anti-gay.
Like, everybody if this guy was secretly a Jew, right, [00:28:00] like, dang. Right? Like I’m, I’m just sort of, like we all should be advocating for our own group. This is, this is where, you know, when somebody sees a Jew say something like, “Well, you know, I support Israel over the United States.” And people are like, “Oh, can you believe they...”
I’m like, I mean, they’re Jewish. Y- yeah, like I support America over any other country, but I’m, I’m an American, right? You know? That’s like the core of my identity, my genetic history, my cultural history. And if I lived in, for example, Britain, I would never move to supporting Britain over America just ‘cause I had a job there.
Speaker 6: I should clarify, this is very different from supporting your own in a way that creates negative externalities, like the Jews did where the ADL ended up supporting, , in trying to de-platform that content creator who rightfully was calling out Orthodox Jewish communities for running welfare fraud, or Chabad did in getting that guy who killed a bunch of people off, or the Mormon sort of [00:29:00] cabal did around the bricks and minifigs.
Yeah, , that’s, that creates problems. But in terms of just being pro-Mormon if you’re Mormon, , and you know, saying, “Oh, I’ll hire a Mormon over a non-Mormon,” like f- of course. Of course. Why would, why would we not want... That’s presumably what we all want
I mean, in this respect, sometimes we’ll have like Jewish fans or Catholic fans who will be like, “Oh, well, I’d support America over Israel,” or, “I’d support America over the Vatican.” And I’m like, It doesn’t... I mean, I support America because I’m an American , , and my religious and cultural history is American.
If your plan is to eventually become fully American, that will eventu- I mean, intergenerationally lead to a break from your past identity. It’s not a flex to not care about protecting your people. , Your people are different from our people, and if you deny that, [00:30:00] you can. America does integrate people, but full integration, eventually means some form of true and permanent separation from whatever your original group is.
, And I think that we’re actually seeing that within portions of the American Catholic population and their relation with the Vatican right now. , It’s just w- when is this fully accepted? And, and as well as with the American, portions of the American Jewish population
Like the Jew who tells me, as some Jews have, that they would support American interests over the interests of Jews more broadly, I don’t hear that and think, “Oh, that’s super cool.” Or the, the Catholic who’s like, “I would support American interests over the Vatican interests.” I don’t hear, hear that and I’m like, “Oh, oh, oh yeah, you’re so cool.”
Like any more than like if I moved to another country, even if, even if I spent 50 or 60 years there, I wouldn’t support that country over America. And some people can move to America and become fully American. Like I think Leaflet’s a good example of [00:31:00] this. But, you know, I don’t expect that from everyone.
It’s just that when it’s clear that a person isn’t moving here for that reason, there’s probably another place where they would be better suited
Malcolm Collins: You know, that’s, it, the, the guy was playing on Team Jew, you know? His, his goal was it, you know, in- inje- inject Catholic doctrine with protect the Jews, right? And, and he achieved that. So to continue here. He also thought gays had, like, a special position in, in God’s design even when he was religious.
So here’s another quote from him. “I have asked myself, is there a special meaning in the homosexual condition? God creates the great majority of humans heterosexual and only a small minority homosexual. Is there a special task associated with the condition of this latter?” By the way, there is. It’s, it’s self-control.
But that doesn’t occur to him. An, an additional opportunity to [00:32:00] exercise self-control and an additional challenge. “Since they are an oppressed minority, aware of the hypocrisy of society and the damage done by the dominant culture, I have suggested that gays and lesbians are intended to extend solidarity to all marginalized groups and demand greater justice.
Because homosexuals are largely invisible in society, their prophetic vocation will have a cultural impact and support the struggle for human emancipation.” So, like, keep in mind that this is what this guy thought his spiritual mission to do with, like, the tithings that were supporting him. So, Simone, before I go further
Simone Collins (2): I’m just so flat.
Like, this is so Maybe this doesn’t have more people talking about it because it’s so hard to process that it actually could happen, I guess. Like, it just... Like, if you were to see a flying saucer land right in front of you, or, like, you were to [00:33:00] drive by one in a parking lot, you’d be like, “Well, I definitely didn’t see that,” ‘cause that would, that could never happen.
And so- Yeah, no, I
Malcolm Collins: actually f- y- people know me. Like, come on, this is Malcolm. He’s gonna have an anti-Catholic conspiracy rant. Like, that- Yeah, but I- ... that could work. That, that should go like butter for me.” But it’s just, like, too blatant, right? Like, it’s like you spend your whole life on alien- Yeah, like how could
Simone Collins (2): this...
My brain can’t process it. It doesn’t make sense.
Malcolm Collins: I mean, it’s, it’s like you spend your whole life on alien conspiracies, and then aliens land in your front yard with a flying saucer. They come out, and Elvis is hanging out with them, and he starts doing, like, an Elvis dance in front of you. And you’re like- Yeah, and you’re like, “
Simone Collins (2): I, I don’t know what to do with this.”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, you’re just like, “What? What? What?” That’s, that’s not even, like, an interesting... Like, gay Jew infiltrates the Vatican and infects them with weird ideology that inverts their prior religious principles? What? No, [00:34:00] no, Malcolm. Bad Malcolm. Th- th- d- Oh, my God. But we’re gonna pull on this thread, okay? And this is also why for me and, and, a- and I’ve always said, like, this is why I really personally, when people always wonder, “Well, what’s your source of authority,” right?
Ever having a source of authority that, like, is living and not dead for me is always really difficult, because it can always just decide to disagree with you, right? Mm. Like, this isn’t just something that Catholics face. Like, suppose I’m a true believing Mormon and I truly believe everything I believe, right?
Like, and, and just like- Mm ... tomorrow the church can come out and say, “Your beliefs are officially wrong now. Update them or you’re no longer a correct Mormon.” I’d just be like, “But I really believed all of that,” right? Like, “You taught me all of that, and then I really believed it. And now all of a sudden black skin wasn’t a punishment?”
Right? Like, what, what do you mean? Right? Like, that, that [00:35:00] was- Oh, God ... that was the, the war, right? They were the people who sat out the war in heaven between Jesus and Satan, right? We, th- we, we, we, we’ve alwa- I, that, that’s not, like, tangential to my worldview. That’s a core part of my reality, right? But to continue here.
And then so I f- I, I think that the way that a lot of American Catholics have gotten around this is they sort of I think branched with, well, what the Vatican is doing largely around the second council, and now they practice something that’s, like, a- a- adjacent and may, may one day recapture the Church.
But, like, the You know. And, and if you look at current demographics, you know, th- they might... The question is, is how far does the church go before they recapture it, right? Mm. Okay. That’s another quote’s from him, ‘cause I wanna, I wanna get in his mind here, okay? “The definition of human nature tends to reflect the self-understanding of the cultural elite.”
S- So here what he’s talking about is whether or not I think [00:36:00] gayness is normal, right? And he’s trying to- Okay ... and because he believes that, like, white straight males are the cultural elite with, like, their heteronormative ideas he’s trying to argue that, like, gayness isn’t, quote-unquote, “unnatural.”
Because I w- I was trying to understand his, like, theology on this, ‘cause, like, the Bible’s pretty clear on gayness, right? And, and so therefore calling gay love unnatural is a cultural statement, is what he’s trying to argue here. Not an absolute moral one. He challenged the traditional natural law that homosexuality is inherently disordered.
So let’s, let’s go into, to what, what he, what I think he means by this. Basically when he reads in the parts of the Bible where gayness is seen as negative, he would say, “Well, that was just those cultures at that time.” And that’s where he got, you know, that’s, that’s where he’s like, “So I don’t need to follow what, what, you know, those cultures did because our church’s theology and [00:37:00] motivation has evolved since then.”
And what’s interesting is you can sort of tell under what does he think that it evolved into, it evolved into the goals of the urban monoculture. This sort of, you know, endless helping of the society’s, quote-unquote, “oppressed classes,” which, which doesn’t necessarily map onto real oppressed people, as we’ve talked about in the press.
It’s, it’s more like an urban monocultural distinction of, like, ethnically superior groups in their mind. But let’s go into the quote on what he said about Catholics and Jews, because you might think I am overstating him saying, “You’re the Catholic, you shouldn’t try to convert Jews.” He said, “After Auschwitz, the Christian churches no longer wanted to convert the Jews.
While they may not be sure of the theological grounds that dispense them from that mission, the churches have become aware that asking Jews to become Christian , is a spiritual way of blotting out their existence, and thus only reinforces the effects of the Holocaust.”
Simone Collins (2): Hold on.
[00:38:00] What? Hmm. Th- that, that, like, undermines- All of Jesus’
Malcolm Collins: teachings? All of Jesus’ stuff, yeah.
Simone Collins (2): Okay, okay. I’m not... This is like, this is, again, this is why I can’t process this. Like, how did he get this through? Like, this, it boggles the mind. Okay, well, keep going. Maybe it will start making
Malcolm Collins: sense. No, that part wasn’t in the official document, but that was something that he said in an official capacity.
Okay. We’ll get to the stuff in the document in a
bit. Okay.
Let’s talk about his conversion. So when did he convert to Catholicism? Okay. Formerly, you know, living in a, a Jewish household. He had one parent who wasn’t Jewish, though, his dad. Oh, okay. He converted at the age of 23 That is very suspicious age to convert.
Simone Collins (2): Why? I mean, isn’t that... You’re, you’re almost fully myelinated. Like, you could argue that’s your time of [00:39:00] intellectual maturity. It’s the time to really reevaluate- No, it is true- ... some of your mental religion ... most people
Malcolm Collins: convert, if they are gonna convert to a different religion, between the age of 13 and 23.
But this is also an age where if I was a Jew and sitting down and thinking like, “How could I have the most positive impact with my life for my whiter people?” Like, what’s the moonshot of moonshots, right? Like, if I could incept a group with converting Jews as equivalent to the Holocaust, and you should from a religious standpoint get along with Jews it would be the, the Vatican, right?
That, that’s, that’s the, I mean, I, I think of religious orders on Earth, it might be the largest single religious order. Because, you know, with like Islam, there’s not like, even, even if you could, there’s so many different factions. So even if you could somehow . inception.
Speaker 26: We create and perceive our world simultaneously, and our mind does this so well that we don’t even know it’s happening. That allows us to get [00:40:00] right in the middle of that process. How? By taking over the creating part. Now, this is where I need you.
Malcolm Collins: In- incep- do an inception on like a, one of the Muslim faiths, you still wouldn’t affect as many people. So just be like, “Oh, at 23 I converted.” And he said he converted after a friend gave him a copy of St. Augustine’s Confessions.
That’s a weird reason to convert. Like when people generally convert, it’s either because they’re on a mission, like actively s- seeking what they think is true. Or you know, something profound happens to them, or they see something that they think can only be described as miraculous. Like for us, or for me, the thing that really made me so fanatical in my belief was when, like literally happening through this podcast and on this podcast, is me going back to stories of the Bible that everyone in my childhood had told me they said one thing, and then I read them and they say something that is one, both completely [00:41:00] different and completely implausible that people at that period in Biblical history could have known.
D- see our Adam and Eve episode or our Genesis Confirms the Bible episode, or any, like just more broadly, I’ve been broadly shocked by how little... And so that had me sort of be like, “Okay it is miraculous to me that I could grow up next to these stories and not realize h- how sort of- correlatory they were to reality as I understood it, right?
You know, how much sense they made, the things that I thought felt unethical, like the Adam and Eve story, actually weren’t when I reread them. And that, for me, was very... That, that’s like the way a normal person converts. I read St. Augustine’s Confessions and I converted. That sounds like the type of poetic nonsense that a Catholic would buy, but I don’t really buy it myself.
But anyway what was his early work? So what were some of the first things that he started writing as soon as he got, like, officially into the Catholic [00:42:00] Church as a full-time, like, staffer, right? In 1961, he published The Jews and the Gospel, later reissued Is the New Testament Anti-Semitic. He emphasized God’s covenant with the Jewish people as valid and irrevocable, drawing from Romans 11:29, “The gifts and the call of God are irrevocable.”
The church is, quote-unquote, “incomplete without Israel” and Judaism continues as a source of divine grace, he believed. Okay, so first let’s do a, a broad g- overview of, of Nostra Aetate and then we’ll go into the various points in it. So broadly speaking, it promotes a more positive view of non-Christian religions, e.g.,
positive remarks on Hinduism, Buddhism, esteem for Muslims, stating they adore the one God. Strongly condemns antisemitism and rejects charging, quote-unquote, “all the Jews with responsibility for Christ’s passion.” Affirms God’s ongoing special relationship with the Jewish people, quote, “God holds the Jews most dear...”. So yeah [00:43:00] To keep going here, let’s get into specific authority.
And so first I wanna go into, like, how much a- a- authority does this have for Catholics, okay? It’s considered an authoritative teaching of the church. Catholics are expected to accept it with r- religious assent, the same level as most consular or papal teachings that are not defined as infallible dogma.
So, and if this isn’t infallible, but that doesn’t mean that Catholics aren’t supposed to accept it. We’ll get to the official teaching on that. It is not a dogmatic definition. Like some statements on Legent, Gitmen, and earlier councils it is as a pastoral and declarative document addressing the church’s relationships with non-Christian religions.
Catholics owe it a, quote-unquote, “religious assent or sub- sincere submission of intellect and will.” So the part of the catechism of the Catholic church, which is, like, the official things on documents of this type, by the way it says, “Divine assistance is also given to the successors of the apostates teaching in communion with the successor of Pete and in particular the way- The apostles or apostates?
Simone Collins (2): Sorry, I’m trying to keep up ... [00:44:00]
Malcolm Collins: A- apostles. Did I say apostates? Yeah. That’s quite a Freudian tip there. The, the apostles teaching in communion with the successor of Pete, and in particular way to the bishop of Rome, pastor of the whole church, when, without arriving at an infallible definition and without pronouncing an in- definable manner, they propose in the exercise of the ordinary magisterium a teaching that leads to a better understanding of Revelation in matters of faith and morals.
To this ordinary teaching and faithful are to adhere with religious assent. So this falls into the category of, to this ordinary teaching and faithful are to adhere with religious a- assent.
Mm. Which,
though distinct from the assent of faith, is nonetheless an extension of it. Because Catholics are also like, “Well, it, it, it’s not exactly like you have to assent with faith,” and it’s like that’s true, but the, this is the actual teachings of the church on this.
Mm-hmm. ‘Cause I wanted to double-check on this, ‘cause people are always like, “Oh, well, that’s, like, just a vague suggestion from the church,” and it’s like, it’s not a vague suggestion. That is not official Catholic [00:45:00] doctrine. That is a, this schismatic belief. But it’s okay, right? Like, it’s, a, a, you know, if, if you, if you believe that the church is wrong in this document too, then they’re just wrong in all the documents, right?
So, you know, we can go back to the older councils.
Speaker 21: This actually gets to me, , and I think it helps me explain to myself what’s going on better. In the same way that I get really confused when I talk to a Jew and they’re like, “Your children are Jewish,” and I’m like, “They’re like one-sixteenths Jewish.” Like, , that makes no sense to me, right? Like, I’m like, “I-- Yeah, I mean, matrilineally they’re Jewish, but they’re not...”
You know, no other culture on Earth would think of them as Jewish. But a Jew will think, an Orthodox Jew at least, “No, they are 100% Jewish.” And I just can’t understand that ‘cause I’m from a different cultural perspective. , It’s the same with Catholics, where a Catholic will be like, “Well, I’m not schismatic.”
And it’s like, “Well, you, you do disagree with the Magisterium on these issues.” And it’s like, “Well, I don’t identify as schismatic, therefore I’m not schismatic.” And I’m like, “Well, that’s not really...” And then I’m like, “Oh, I just need to see this from their [00:46:00] perspective.” And it’s not just their perspe-- it’s also the perspective of the people at the Vatican.
They also don’t see these people as schismatic. , And it’s just that I’m never gonna be able to understand what it’s like to perceive the world in this way
Malcolm Collins: Yes. Okay. So, this is also rooted... So if you wanna go to where this comes from, it comes from Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium 25, which the CCC quotes to build this out, but the quote from that is, “This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman pontiff, even when it’s not speaking ex cathedra, that it must be shown in a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence.
The judgements made by him are sincerely adhered to according to his manifest mind and will.” So again, religious submission of mind and will. Okay. So now let’s get into the stuff that was updated by this document, the new parts. Okay. Yes. Thought, Simone, before we go further.
Simone Collins: Keep going. I,
Simone Collins (2): I wanna, I wanna see what the updates are.
Malcolm Collins: [00:47:00] Okay, great. Yeah. So this is in relation to Hinduism, Buddhism Muslims, et cetera. Okay? Okay. “The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reve- reverence those ways of conduct and life, that precepts and teachings which, though different in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless offer and reflect a ray of that truth which enlightens all men.”
Hmm.
That’s crazy Um That’s, that’s completely crazy. And, and, and note here if you contrast this with previous councils, right? So we have the Council of Florence, Conte Dominio 1441, what did it say in relation to these sorts of stuff? It af- firmly believes professors and proclaims that those [00:48:00] not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews, and heretics, and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart into everlasting fire, which was prepared for the devil and his angels.
Unless- Okay ... before the end of the same have been added to the flock. That, that seems like uncertainly a, a, a very different teaching.
Simone Collins (2): Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: The, at a, at a very different perspective, right? And I think a lot of Catholics still want to hold to that perspective. And so I, I can see why it’s becoming so popular, these sort of pseudo-schismatic branches.
So what did the document say about various specific religions, right? ‘Cause it also, like, even went so far as to start glazing individual religions. On Hinduism it says, “Thus in Hinduism, men contemplate the divine mystery and express it through inexhaustible abundance of myth and through searching philosophical in- inquiry.
They seek freedom from the anguish of [00:49:00] our human condition either through ascetical practices or profound mediation or flight to God with love and trust.” On Buddhism, “Again, Buddhism in its various forms realizes the radical insufficiency of this changeable world. It teaches in a way by which men in a devout and confident spirit may either to acquire the state of perfect liberation or attain by their own efforts or through higher help, supreme illumination.”
Simone Collins (2): No. The... I don’t know. So in the, in the Primer’s Guide to Crafting Religion, you make it pretty clear there are basically two types of religions. You can have two types of approaches to what it is required to be saved, and one is limited to atonement. You, you, you can’t save everyone, you know? Not... There are some people who are just not gonna make it, and these are kind of, in some ways, not very nice religions because they accept that you [00:50:00] can’t save everyone and some people are damned, whatever that might mean.
The two core religions which
Malcolm Collins: have this perspective are the Calvinist denominations of Protestantism of which we are one-
Simone Collins (2): Mm-hmm ...
Malcolm Collins: and the
Simone Collins (2): Jews. And then there’s the other which is a more domineering religion which believes that everyone can and should be saved. And in this way the religion is a bit unpleasant because it basically would entail, if you really wanna save everyone, coercing people to convert against their will.
And what this is trying to do is be neither. Like, it’s not like, “Well, no- no one, no one can be saved,” but it- Also, it’s not trying to save anyone. It’s just like, “Well, everyone’s kind of right,” which is kind of the worst thing. Like- Yeah ... I don’t care, do what you wanna do. It’s the absence of religion.
It’s the antithesis of Catholicism and, and any organized religion. I, I just can’t believe they... This has to- You know what I- Like, maybe someone’s gonna chime in in the comments and be like, “Oh, this is some obscure piece of writing that’s not official in any real capacity.” I, I [00:51:00] mean, could that be? Is that what’s going on here?
This was affirmed by one of the major councils and the Pope. Yeah, but is this the equivalent of, like, someone hearting something on X, you know, h- adding a heart to a post on X and not realizing- No, that’s why I
Malcolm Collins: went through the other documents that, specifically the, the Ca- catechism documents and stuff like that, so you could read before we get into this exactly the way that Catholics per previous rulings that were seen as coming directly from God- Yeah
are supposed to relate to teachings within this category, submitting
to them.
Mm. It’s, it’s not the same as having faith in, in them.
Speaker 28: By the way, I put Simone’s concerns into an AI to see what the AI would say, and it says, “Simone’s skepticism is understandable as a layperson reacting to something that feels like a massive shift, but it’s not accurate. Nostra Aetate is not some obscure low authority footnote. It’s a formal declaration of the Second Vatican Council as an [00:52:00] ecumenical council, overwhelmingly approved two thousand two hundred and twenty-one to eighty-eight, and officially promulgated by Pope Paul VI
catholic teaching, as outlined in the - Catechism of the Catholic Church, , eight nine two to eight nine three, and rooted in Lumen Gentium twenty-five, requires religious assent, a sincere submission of intellect and will to teachings from the ordinary magisterium of the ecumenical council, even when they are not infallible dogmas.
This is distinct from full assent of faith from infallible documents, but is still binding and not optional or dismissible as just a suggestion
Malcolm Collins: So this isn’t
Simone Collins (2): someone passively endorsing something without sufficiently paying attention to it or, I don’t know- Yeah ... someone just being like, “Here’s an interesting idea.
Sure, we’ll publish it,” but like, you know how The Huffington Post- No, this is- ... used to be. You know, they’d be like, “Yeah, we’ll accept your blog submission,” and they wouldn’t really, like...
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, this is very, very, very different than, say, [00:53:00] like, the Vatican wrote something in an official paper or something like that, right?
Keep in mind th- ths had to be of, of the declaration of the Second Vatican Council, so that’s a, a Vatican council, mind you. Right. This had to be voted on by the bishops, right? Who knew? Okay, wow. So
of the vote- Yeah ... of the vote 2,221 voted for it and only 88 voted against it. So it was also overwhelmingly approved. Then it was promulgated, that’s an official issue. That means review an official issue by Pope Paul VI.
I mean I, o- obviously I, I, I think that there’s a, I mean, Catholics, I, I feel like Want to say, like, and- and w- well, you know, we don’t, the real Catholics don’t take this sort of thing, and the way that those documents say you’re supposed to relate to this stuff is actually corrupted as well, and this stuff shouldn’t actually fall under that.
And I think [00:54:00] the Catholics actually have a number of outs here. There’s been a number of things in recent papal elections that could be s- considered outright fraudulent. I may do a whole episode on that at some point.
Simone Collins (2): Whoa, really? Ar- What do you mean outright? Can you g- what do you mean by outright fraudulent?
Malcolm Collins: They did some things, the Jesuits did, in how they held... It wasn’t the pope of this pope, but it was one of the previous popes, I think. Okay. Where they pulled some shenanigans that sort of prevented people from voting. Like the, the block that was against them from being there to vote. Oh, wow
Yeah. It, it was w- I, I, I can’t remember the specifics. A Catholic was the one who would, because obviously they were most invested in this when he was crashing out on me about the Jesuits and, and, and blackpilling me on the Jesuits and making me sort of see Catholicism as this fight of, like, the good guys, the Opus Dei versus the Jesuits for, like, the heart of what it becomes.
But this, the way I sort of see this right now, like a- as I’m looking at it from an outsider, is I historically, as a kid was of all the sci-fi franchises, and I was a big sci-fi nerd the one [00:55:00] sci-fi franchise I didn’t really like was Star Wars. I, I- Hmm ... I liked Star Trek over Star Wars.
Starship Troopers obviously love. SG-1- Sure ... love. Gotta do a whole video on how they canceled the SG-1 reboot because- Oh my gosh ... it treated the military too well. Oh, no. Fans might like it. It did- it didn’t make the tribals, like, better. People might like
Simone Collins (2): the military, yeah. Wait, and by the way, Stargate did not universally portray the military well.
In fact, some of the most annoying episodes were ones where they, I guess r- fairly, you know, well, not realistically, but- No, US politicians- ... give a realistic depiction of how military bureaucracy can really gunk things up sometimes.
Malcolm Collins: No, no, no, that was, those, almost every one of the episodes you’re thinking of was tied to the US Senate or Congress.
Yeah. And the military was the good guy. Oh, yeah,
Simone Collins (2): yeah,
Malcolm Collins: yeah. Okay, you’re right, you’re right. So- No, I feel like they were
Simone Collins (2): even not realistic. You know, they’re like, “What? There are some problems that the military faces.” The, the point
Malcolm Collins: here being is despite me not being a Star Wars fan- Okay ... watching Disney buy Star Wars and then start to just write, like, “We hate you” in [00:56:00] poo all over the walls of the property made me genuinely sad, right?
Reading this feels a bit like watching the new Disney Star Wars where it’s like- Hmm ... yeah, I might not have been the biggest fan of that property, but like, why’d you have to do them that dirty, right? Like, and, and as a Star Wars fan, I feel it’s, it’s probably pretty similar to being, like, a Catholic today, where it’s like, well, you know- None of the real fans actually take those new ones and consider them canon, right?
We’re still all about legends over here. What, what are you talking about? Yeah, we’re, we’re
Simone Collins (2): in this for the long run. It’ll, it’ll come around
Malcolm Collins: again. Yeah, we’re, we’re... Everybody knows Disney’s eventually gonna realize this didn’t work, as I’ve heard rumors that they’re thinking about doing an, and retconning it.
So we’re, we’re gonna get a, a Vatican II retcon. Just like go , go back
Simone Collins (2): but anyway. But they can. That’s the cool thing, is they can. They can say, “Look, that was a mistake. I don’t know what happened. It’s over now. Undo.” There’s...
Malcolm Collins: Catholics ki-kind... How could you retcon [00:57:00] Vatican II? Could it be done? I guess the best way to- Delete.
Delete.
Simone Collins (2): Undo. We’re sorry, we were wrong. It, how, what
Malcolm Collins: the... The Catholic Church has
Simone Collins (2): made lots of weird-
Speaker 29: I asked an AI how you could retcon Vatican II, , with this context, and basically what it said is full deletion is extremely unlikely. It would require admitting a major error in a council guided by the Holy Spirit, which undermines everything the church claims about itself
Simone Collins (2): The, I mean, I think the most real
Malcolm Collins: way to do it was to assert that they didn’t have official power when they put it out, and that something had g- that’s, that’s... I mean, like, obviously there’s been instances in the past where there have been, like, multiple popes at the same time.
And then a council came together and decided, “Okay, now we have another new pope,” that decides, you know, gets... You know, clearly you gotta have a, a, a, a chain of, what do they call that? The chain of whatever. , They got together, they decided this new pope, and then the new pope comes in and, and immediately says, “Actually, popes rule over councils.” And the council was like, “But we brought you here saying you wouldn’t do that,” right? Mm. So like, yeah. They’ve, they’ve done a bit of this in the [00:58:00] past.
But I don’t think any of that was as, like, written down as Vatican II was. I don’t think that that i- it counted as the same l- category of stuff that can’t easily be retconned. But I mean, clearly it retconned something else. So like, Catholics can chime in here. So let’s go what they said about Islam.
Okay? “The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems.” Th-this is what they... Is- Islam. “They adore the one God, living and subsisting in himself, merciful and all-powerful, the creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men. They take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even his inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham...”
Dot, dot, dot, submitted to God. “Though they do
Not
Malcolm Collins: acknowledge Jesus as God,
they revere him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, his virgin mother.” Dot, dot, dot. “In addition, they await the day of judgment” dot, dot, dot. “Finally, they value the moral life and worship God, especially through prayer, almsing, and fasting.”[00:59:00]
Hmm.
Yeah. Which is interesting here. When you take our, our view or, or contrast it with our view on all of this I mean, at least we take the stance of like, well, we do say that Jews and Muslims are worshiping derivations of what appear to be the same god. Like Hindis and Buddhists are certainly not.
Like I- pff, that was, that was wild.
“As the sacred synod searches into the mysteries of the church, it remembers the bond,” this is about the Jews that spiritually ties the people of the new covenant to Abraham’s stock... The Church, therefore, cannot forget that she received the revelation of the Old Testament through the people with whom,” the Jews, “the people with whom God in his inexpressible mercy concluded the ancient covenant.”
And then they cite here, “On account of their fathers, this people remains most dear to God, for God does not repent of the gifts he makes nor the calls he issues,” Rome [01:00:00] 11:28-29. And so this directly quotes Romans. And then further they say, “Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as this follows from the Holy Scriptures.”
And then on collective guilt, this is from Nostra aetate again, “True, the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead presented for the death of Christ. Still, what happened in his Christ passion cannot be charged against all Jews with distinction then alive nor against the Jews of today.”
Right. “It offered to cry his hatred, persecutions, displays of antisemitism directed against Jews at any time by anyone.”
Okay. But yeah, I had no idea. That is really sad. That is, that is, I mean, a potentially near God tier play by an individual Jew. And if not that, at least a heavy infestation by the urban monoculture, ‘cause he was already living, you know, at the, the very least in the lifestyle of the urban monoculture.
You know, [01:01:00] sex with men while, you know, writing this stuff down. If you see his wider philosophy, it’s very clearly more tied to the urban monoculture theology than anything that could historically could have been considered Catholic values or
Simone Collins (2): theology. Yeah, not even close.
Malcolm Collins: So very crazy, crazy conspiracy.
And you guys- Well,
Simone Collins (2): conspiracy, yeah, I guess the, the, the larger question though this doesn’t appear to be documented from what you found, who let this happen? Like, y- you’re talking about this guy going through, publishing all this stuff, but th- all these people that voted for it, all these people that added to it- Yeah
to your point, right? Like- Who let this
Malcolm Collins: happen? Like, if you want to know how co- when people act like... And this is the other thing that got me, is I had this impression as an outsider that, like, when people are like, “Oh, we’ll retake control of the Vatican. We’ll retake control of church infrastructure. We’ll...”
I hear that and I get this impression that, like, oh, well, maybe they’ve recently been able to get their hooks into the Vatican. [01:02:00] Maybe there’s, like, this ideological divide in the Vatican. 2,201 of the bishops approved this with only 88 against this. This is not, like, two power factions or something like that, or an infiltration of the Vatican.
If this is an infiltration of the Vatican, it’s... What, what percent is that?
Simone Collins (2): Yeah, I guess I don’t know how the voting structure is set up. I don’t know if this is, like, people around the world or a bunch of people concentrated in- Yeah, so-
Vatican City ...
Speaker 30: So, , again here I decided to ask the AI to find out who are these bishops? Are they just randos or are they actually the people who run the Catholic Church? , And it said, , the bishops who voted for Nostra Aetate as well as all Vatican II documents are the actual power structure of the Catholic Church, not randoms.
They are called the council fathers, the highest level church governments in an ecumenical council. , They included all diocesan bishops, head of dioceses around the world, archbishops, cardinals, [01:03:00] Eastern Catholic patriarchs, head of major religious orders with voting rights. It was the largest gathering of Catholic bishops in history, deliberately global for the first time.
Bishops came from Europe, North, South America, Africa, Asia, et cetera, and not just Vatican insiders and Europeans
This is why Malcolm and Simone noted that in an extremely lopsided vote, only 3.8% against, it shows nearly universal buy-in from the worldwide, , episcopate at the time, not just a small clique of Vatican insiders
Malcolm Collins: so 3.8% of the bishops voted against this
3.8%. And that was in 1965. So, like, not recently either. Like, when I talk about this institutional capture having been in the Vatican for a very, very long time at this point, I’m not like, that isn’t me being a conspiracy theorist or something. I’m just trying to, like, lay out, like, what I’m seeing as an outsider.
And so, the [01:04:00] best thing that you can do, I guess, if you wanna recapture it, is just breed. And yeah. Get involved.
Simone Collins (2): I, I mean, yeah. This shows things can change, and things can also change quite violently. But this means that I think that there’s hope they can change violently in a different direction.
Malcolm Collins: Are you actually... I love Simone as an outsider. Went from, like, your standard progressive whatever and now she’s like, “The Catholic Church needs a civil war. They must take out the Vatican.”
Simone Collins (2): Well, this is I don’t know. It, it’s like someone trying to change t- they’re like marching into an anime convention and they’re like, “No, this is a Star Trek convention now.”
Like, fine, but go to a Star Trek convention. Like, leave the anime nerds alone. This is about anime. So I don’t, I don’t... Like autistically, I don’t like the, [01:05:00] the, the diluting and confusing of the categories. I need Catholics
Malcolm Collins: to be Catholics. Yeah, like at the very least, I think if something was written by somebody who deconverted, it should be taken out of official church teachings Like that should be, that should be the thing that invalidates it
Simone Collins (2): Yeah, that’s, yeah.
May- I mean, I think until pretty recent history, people just didn’t deconvert, so there is not yet a cultural technology to address that, and this is exactly the point you make among many others, of course, in The Prophet is Patched Against Religion. And it wasn’t even like he deconverted
Malcolm Collins: for like a good reason.
It was just like he wanted to have sex with strangers. Like that seems to be the reason he deconverted.
Simone Collins (2): Again, I think there’s an argument to be made for that being then the system working as intended. That the bigger problem would be if active and especially policy-wise influential people in the Catholic clergy were like, “I wanna have gay sex and I’m gonna just stay and continue to generate policy and do, have it all.”
[01:06:00] So I don’t see the deconversion as the bad sign, but I do see statements that seem to nullify pretty definitional or, or foundational concepts, at least as I as an outsider understand them about Catholicism. And that’s throwing me for a loop. But even from pretty devout Catholics, we hear about these like, well, there was this conspiracy and this particular faction was trying to mess with things, and I feel like there’s A non-trivial amount of politicking, infighting, and influence campaigns that are influencing what’s happening in Vatican City, and to a, a great extent, the most devout, active, practicing Catholics that we know have an attitude of, “Look, at the parish level, we are going to thrive.
We’re going to follow kind of a pre-Vatican II version of [01:07:00] the, of the Catholic Church and pretend that this stuff didn’t happen. We are going to leverage the infrastructure of the Catholic Church and of bishops and everything else when we need it,” like if we need a, a Catholic school to be spun up. They will lean on the formal church when they need to, but for the most part, they’re just like, “Look, what we’re creating is what’s going to last.
We’re the ones having kids. We’re just gonna ride this out, and eventually they’re gonna find their way back to sanity.” But I don’t know if that’s gonna happen.
Malcolm Collins: So just so you get an idea
Of like what level of authority this teaching would hold. It would hold the same level of authority as something like the theology of the body which actually I think holds a little bit less because it wasn’t also affirmed by a religious council. So that, that sort of gives you an idea of like the level of import...
And theology of body is pretty important Catholic teaching. Mm. So yeah. [01:08:00] Anyway love you Simone. That’s a crazy episode. And it- Understatement, yeah. It, it feels a bit like, is this a simulation? Because like if there was something this big, why was I unaware of it?
Yeah.
Yeah. Like, it seems like one of the first things you would mention if you were a Protestant talking about this stuff
Simone Collins (2): You would think that.
Y- yes. But again, I think it’s one of those things where it’s so outlandish, it’s so hard to believe, that it just doesn’t process. Yeah. And again, I, I have... I think there’s at least a good 30% chance that someone, a Catholic in the comments chimes in and is like, “This means nothing. You’re doing the equivalent of s- you know, saying, well, you know, Person [01:09:00] X responded to Person Y’s comment on YouTube, and that doesn’t mean that’s an endorsement of Person Y’s com- you know-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that’s not-
reputation or commentary ... an official endorsement. Yeah. Or that there’s different ways of relating to the councils, or there’s different ways of relating to the bishops. Yeah,
Simone Collins (2): so I feel, I t- I, I just, we have to be missing something. It has to be something like this. The bishops who
Malcolm Collins: voted on this, the thing that I c- is, is le- less than 4% voted against this.
Like, that to me shows that, like, the quest, even if that’s true, for retaking the Vatican, is an astronomically uphill battle.
Yeah.
That’s like when my loading bar’s at 96%, that’s like when I am in my- Yeah, it’s, you’re functionally there, yeah.
Simone Collins (2): Mm-hmm. It,
Malcolm Collins: it, it’s like there. It’s done, right? Like, it’s cooked.
Mm-hmm. But they do have, fortunately, current demographics on their side.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins (2): We’ll see. We’ll see. Thanks for sharing that with me, [01:10:00] though. That was a wild ride. All right, have a good
Malcolm Collins: one.
Simone Collins (2): You too.
Malcolm Collins: What are we doing for dinner?
Simone Collins (2): You’re having the rendang either with french fries- All right ... or on a Hawaiian bun.
Malcolm Collins: Fries.
Simone Collins (2): Okay. Fancy Korean fries or normal fries?
Malcolm Collins: Fancy Korean fries.
Simone Collins (2): Oh, if we have any. I’ll make sure we have some. If not, normal fries. If we don’t have those, then we can
Malcolm Collins: do curly fries.
Simone Collins (2): Oh, I thought you didn’t like the curly fries. You
Malcolm Collins: did like them? They’re great. We just gotta cook them a bit longer.
Simone Collins (2): Okay. All right.
Simone Collins: thought I was a
prude. No Yeah, people were
Malcolm Collins: mad at us for like
Not being aggressively mean.
Simone Collins: Yeah. What on earth? Like, hello.
Malcolm Collins: Like when we give me, I think this is something that the wider conservative community doesn’t get about Aila’s relationship to the community. We’re talking about the episode , from yesterday about how somebody from Aila’s circle actually made us against early stage abortion, which we were not before through a very well argued piece.
But it starts, the story [01:11:00] starts with a birthday gang bang. Well, no,
Simone Collins (2): her, her essay doesn’t, but like our discussion of her does because she recently talked about her experience meeting her future husband, I think, I think they’re engaged to be married and they have a kid to- together now, at Aila’s famous birthday gang bang.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And I, because people generally in the conservative movement who aren’t on like the nerd tech side, they’re unaware that Aila in terms of gravity and orbit has been pretty useful to the right. In that because she tries to always say what she believes is true means that she is constantly pissing off the trans community.
A- and constant- Is she? Oh, yeah. She’s, sh- sh- the trans- well, because you, you can’t really talk about the science around transness anymore without just incensing trans people. And because of that, she’s actually sort of broke the egg for a lot of people’s- God ... transition into [01:12:00] more and more conservative ideas.
And I think- Mm ... for a lot of people, the trans issue is their first step on that pipeline.
Simone Collins (2): And so- She, I mean, her sex survey does have, or big kink survey has one of the best samples of at least self-reported trans individuals of probably m- maybe any research done, just given her sample size. So I don’t know if she’s said anything that’s like disturbing, but, or that like makes them look bad, has, she does have very good sample data.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, she’s the one who did the study when we did the trans one showing that transness is linked to violent fetishes. Oh, yeah. We used her data. That’s from her- That’s right ... that’s from her study. That’s true. That that comes from. .
Simone Collins (2): But, but what I mean is
Malcolm Collins: while I may think her actions are immoral, and more immoral today now that I understand the potential negative consequences of sex, and I’ve become dramatically less sex...
Like, I’m kink positive, sex negative now. I just think that n- non-procreative sex is bad. Until [01:13:00] we have better forms of- I guess I just- ... birth control ..., but in the net she pushes people towards our movement. And, and advances, like, the number of conservative donors, voters.
Well, she’s not encouraging anyone
Simone Collins (2): to live her lifestyle. Like, I, I... Sometimes I feel like I get this insinuation from people of, like, that she’s selling something to them. She’s not. No, she, she said that she didn’t like
Malcolm Collins: the gang bang. She tried a gang bang and did not enjoy it. Everybody- Yeah ... like, that seems like a pretty good indication of, like, don’t do this, people.
Simone Collins (2): Well, but more, ugh, Tex is so into pulling on everything. She’s not trying to fob her lifestyle onto anyone. And just like we aren’t either. Like, we’re not... A lot of people like to accuse us. They’re like, “You’re trying to convince all these people who aren’t equipped to have children to have kids.” Like, that’s something someone just today was accusing us of.
And that we... No, we absolutely don’t do that. So I think people like to misattribute this. Really? Were they
Malcolm Collins: accusing us on our comments or on, like, Twitter or something? On X,
Simone Collins (2): yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, okay. So, like, somebody has [01:14:00] no idea what we’re about.
Simone Collins (2): Yeah. But a lot of people have no idea what Aila’s all about, so you know, like, it’s...
I just think it’s stupid. It’s very annoying.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, the, the informational sphere, I guess just when somebody’s aligning with us on anything that puts them on the outs with progressives and they are also helping the whiter project, I’m generally, like, pro them. Like, that’s the way I operate.
Simone Collins (2): I’m generally pro when someone is thoughtful and takes a first principles approach to what they believe and what they’re doing and why, and that’s Aila. Yeah, but
Malcolm Collins: sometimes those people can still be antagonistic to us or, or our efforts. And I, I think that, you know, in th- those instances we need to..
[01:15:00]
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
One of the experiences we treasure most involves our minds being changed on an issue. If we’re wrong about something, we’d prefer to be nudged in a less wrong direction.
We did NOT expect to have one of these experiences when clicking through to learn about a truly modern meet-cute: When Romy Holland met her future husband—and the father of her now-young child—at Aella’s famous birthday gangbang, which she both helped to organize and supported as a fluffer.
Anyway, you’ll see for yourself in today’s episode of Based Camp. Happy Monday! Make sure you read Romy’s full essay—the one that ultimately changed our views on misoprostol, which we had previously seen as pretty innocuous; she’s an eloquent and moving writer.
Show Notes
One of the fluffers at Aella’s birthday gangbangs paired up and ultimately had a child with one of the guests/participants
Crazier than that, this young woman radicalized me on early-term abortion!
The Gist: Romy Holland, a friend of Aella’s, recently went on Slate’s podcast, Death, Sex & Money, to talk about her experience meeting a guy at Aella’s birthday gang bang and eventually falling in love with him. This story was originally covered in the San Francisco Standard. In her
What Happened
* Romy helped organize the famous 42-man gangbang birthday party in 2024
* She also acted as a fluffer at this event
* In this capacity, she met a programmer she had previously noticed online
* They subsequently began dating, had a kid together, and are now engage and—for the time being at least—monogamous
Underrated: Romy blackpilled me on the abortion pill
An underrated element of Romy’s narrative arc thus far is her experience with abortion—something she articulated so beautifully and powerfully that it has totally radicalized me on misoprostol.
Her one substack article (as of June 2026), titled What Nobody Told Me About Abortion, describes her harrowing experience attempting an abortion.
She describes blithe comfort in the face of lies told to us
“On the sort of afternoon full of ripe summer fruit, my new boyfriend and I—still flush with sweat and limerence after some midday sex—stared at an ovulation test strip and realized we’d misread an earlier test.
“Uh oh,” I said, lightly amused as a thousand rom com moments flashed through my mind. Cue the clueless horror movie protagonist who fails to notice the axe murderer behind the bedroom door, mistaken about the genre of the story unfolding.
We listened to music and I swiveled back and forth in an office chair while narrating ChatGPT’s damning answers to my questions about fertile windows and test strip line darkness. My boyfriend kissed me on the cheek each time he walked past. We riffed about games we could play at our abortion party.
Our decision calculus was numerical, emotions an afterthought. There is a 1 in 4 chance of conception each month, so deciding not to take Plan B would result in a 25% risk of needing an abortion. Plan B costs $50 and an abortion costs $500, but with only a 25% chance of conception the expected value of that option is $125. Plan B and early stage abortion seemed physically pretty similar—nothing to consider there.
“If you get pregnant, we’d both know we’re fertile,” my boyfriend pointed out.
“True, why would anyone pay for fertility testing with such a thrilling alternative available?” I quipped back.
In the end, my sense that failing to take Plan B seemed plainly stupid led us to swing by CVS on our way to an under-the-sea-themed party in San Francisco. I was wearing a black and gold ballgown, he, a shimmery jacket that made him look like an undiscovered mer-creature dredged up into the fluorescently lit family planning aisle. Later at the party, I recounted our ill-fated afternoon with punchlines as I pried open the clamshell package and unceremoniously swallowed the Plan B in my friends’ cozy kitchen.”
Then she describes how it goes south
* She got a positive pregnancy test nine days later
* She was fully determined to not see it
* “Ignoring the mounting hum of my instinctual self, I walked across Berkeley on a chilly August evening to pick up abortion pills from the sort of friend who people think of when they say they know a guy.”
“Nobody talks about the hell that is misoprostol, the abortion pill. I suspect that, in its politicization, no one wants to mention that the drug in question is a sledgehammer—on its quest to destroy the fetus, it also obliterates the mother. On Thursday afternoon I unceremoniously took the first of three doses: four little white pills shoved into my vagina as far up as I could wedge them. Tiny bombs placed quietly beside the cradle where my unsuspecting baby slept.
I waited, fever rising, for the bleeding that should have started after an hour or two. The second dose came and went. By dose three I could barely move. I took the stairs one at a time, weakly gripping the railing, my joints aching with each step, the inside of my mouth painfully raw. Curled in bed, I whispered for more and more blankets, shivering and only dimly aware of my boyfriend there beside me searching the internet for answers about my racing heart and shallow, rapid breathing.
In the morning I felt drained, but the fever and pain were gone. The large maxi pad, which the internet warned I may soak through as often as once per hour, was entirely dry.”
* She goes on to observe that “Misoprostol as an abortion protocol is 85% effective. As the 24 hour time point neared and I felt not even the slightest cramping, it became clear that I was among the unlucky 15% of women for whom a second attempt would be necessary.”
* “In taking the first dose of pills, I’d started down an inescapable path and had no choice but to march to its end. As a friend would later say, the correct number of abortions is either zero or as many as it takes.”
* She ultimately had to do four rounds
* She went to Planned Parenthood in San Francisco
* “Desperation welled inside of me. I wanted to grip her bony shoulders, to look her in the eye and ask her what she would have me do with this broken beautiful thing inside of me that had survived six doses of poison and was now fated to die.”
* “More abortion pills, more waiting, more shivering in a ball of feverish torment. Still no blood.”
“My memories of the surgical D&C procedure four days later come to me in fragments that feel sharp in my chest. I remember a cold wand pushed into me searching for a smudge of evidence of my baby. And then a room with a chair and an iPad video that soothingly warned of hysterectomy risk. Finally, a room that smelled of chemicals where I sat on crisp paper and stared at a tray strewn with ominous medical instruments. Panic.”
…
“Through this, I did not move. Tears gathered in my eyes at the inevitability of the situation, at my overwhelming helplessness. I presented my arm to the pretty young nurse who would administer the fentanyl and sedatives. I lay down and spread my legs for the kind practitioner there to vacuum out my stubborn baby. What’s a mother to do in a moment like this, but carry her child gently to the executioner’s arms?”
Romy Meets Other People Who Were Scarred
“I recently had coffee with a friend who became very still when I mentioned my abortion. Tears sprang to her eyes as she told me that she’d once had an abortion too, and although it was seven years ago and although she never wanted the baby, never even wanted to be a mother, it still makes her cry every time she remembers it. She’d taken the abortion pills and two days later, in a grungy dive bar bathroom with music thrumming through the door, she’d found her clot of a baby in her bloody pad.
“I knew I had to eat it,” she told me. And then, as though suddenly realizing that this might sound absurd, she tried to explain. “I mean, I couldn’t just leave it in that dirty bathroom, it was my baby. What was I going to do, throw it in the trash?
I stopped her, shaking my head “no, no, it makes perfect sense to me. It really does, of course you had to eat it, it was your baby.” The maternal logic of this was unassailable. Anyone who has been a mother for any stretch of time would not question such a primordial urge. The animal mother knows what to do, and your judgements are not what carried evolution billions of years to this moment.
“So what did you do?” I asked her.
“I ate it.” She said it wide eyed.””
Romy Experiences the Mental Fallout
“I was not permitted to eat my baby, nor bring it home in a little vial to bury it, or put it on the mantel, or inspect it under a microscope for a tail. Perhaps if I had been, the cataclysmic crash of hormones that awaited me would have taken a gentler shape.
Instead, in the days that followed, I began to experience borderline psychotic episodes.
These hours-long periods would begin with a vague sense of unease and build until the world around me became twisted and surreal, like a haunted house. Sometimes, anger at my boyfriend would inexplicably swell inside of me, sharp and alienating, distancing me from the one person who might understand my pain. Often, I was consumed with an urgent need to go find my missing baby.
My thoughts would enter obsessive, frenzied spirals about this desire, running through the sequence of events that had led to my baby’s departure from my womb where it clearly belonged. My memories of the D&C churned with an ominous bent. The kindness of the nurses suddenly felt coercive, like they had conspired to place me under a spell so that they could use strange and powerful devices to remove a precious, integral part of me.”
* She tried to deal with it by stapling the test to the temple at Burning Man
* “Before I was a mother, I was a woman who belonged entirely to herself. I finally understood then that my baby was gone, and that I was once again alone.”
“It turns out that while full-blown postpartum psychosis is rare, subclinical psychotic thoughts are common, affecting 15-30% of women who give birth, and, less commonly, following abortion and miscarriage. Critically, people experiencing these thoughts retain insight into the fact that their thoughts are distorted, though such knowledge does not immunize them to suffering.”
“It’s strange to me that, given the prevalence of postpartum depression and abortion, I haven’t heard anyone talk openly about either. My concept of abortion was shaped instead through divisive political narratives, which leave me feeling trapped between absolutes in how I am allowed to talk about it, forced to hedge every statement.”
The grief sticks with her
“My grief has settled into a shape small enough to carry around the world. It goes out with me to dinner, and seems to like it when we take evening walks around the neighborhood. Sometimes, when I know it won’t cause too much trouble, I take it out and marvel at it. It’s heavier than it looks, the weight of it on my chest enough to knock the breath out of me if I’m not prepared. Many nights, my grief unfurls and wraps its long tendrils around me. I wake sweating and tangled in my blankets, planets still bright in the sky. Soon enough, it will learn to sleep through the night.”
Romy’s story adds weight to our techno-puritan sense that the damage lies at the action-based inflection point, not some definition of life
“I’ve never quite understood regret. Should the butterfly regret a flap of its wings upon learning of the resulting tornado? Still, as the shadow of loss looms over my days, I have started to think I probably would have been happier in this alternate timeline in which my grief would be balanced by purpose. Whether this will feel true five years from now is harder to say—perhaps one should wait to see what is built from the tornado’s wreckage before declaring regret. I find myself trying to calculate this likelihood, but quickly stop. I know now that some arithmetic belongs to older gods than reason.”
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] m- my wife was actually radicalized by somebody who met their husband, who they ended up having a child with, at a gang bang against early stage abortion. Yep. , , and not slightly radicalized. I got radicalized after hearing this story.
Traumatized and
radicalized. And
this has a lot of crying. It’s emotionally a, more of a rollercoaster than you likely think, so buckle in, guys
Speaker 17: America, get your uteruses tarp.
Speaker 19: I’m a baby killer. Baby killer makes me horny.
Speaker 18: Get that fetus, kill that fetus.
Speaker 19: Down face, b*****s in my cross face. No, I’ma have abortions always.
Would you like to know more?
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Malcolm. I’m excited to be speaking with you today because romance isn’t dead. It turns out, I didn’t know this, but one of the fluffers at Aella’s birthday gang bang has gone on to date one of the gentlemen attending and [00:01:00] participating in the party. And they have a kid together now, and they’re getting married, and, you know, it’s so wholesome.
It’s wonderful.
But- That wholesome and wonderful... No, I love all the other conservatives are talking about there’s this, like, slutty woman who’s using her gang bangs t- to, like, “Oh, I’m gonna have a gang bang for, like, my,” what was it? Like, her kid’s birth or, like, a birth shower or try to get pregnant at a gang bang.
You, you’ve, you’ve seen this, right? Oh,
no, no, no. You’re, you’re referring ab- to Bonnie Blue, her golden baby shower. Yes, golden
baby sho- oh, God.
Speaker 5: Definitely pregnant That is a baby Turn my baby shower into a golden shower. Pregnancy is a big for a lot of people, so I’m gonna make the most of it. Biggest live stream of a birth
Malcolm Collins: This is so gross. Yeah, that’s- No, Bonnie, no.
You, we do not... Bonnie Blue and Aella and her circle, completely different. Like, I can’t even- Yeah, they, they, they are completely- Like, I think people think-
blindedly ... and, and respect for Bonnie Blue and what she does. Like, she is her own extreme sports kind of person. But [00:02:00] the, the Aella cinematic universe is one of, and I think it’s very misunderstood, it, it is one of the most a circle of the most intelligent, articulate educated, informed, and intellectually curious people in the world.
They put 99.9% of post-graduate university students to shame. I would say 95% of professors to complete shame. These are some of the most intellectual people that I’ve ever encountered. They have amazing writing. We’ll get into some of that. But what I love most about this, though and this is where the twist comes, actually, Malcolm, is- Ooh
not only am I, like, this is really sweet, right? We’ve gone from, like, gang bang to marriage, and it, it, there’s something to be said there about kind of the way that life goes and also that, you know, maybe we, we shouldn’t fully judge debauched lifestyles of a little bit of, a bit of fun and hedonism. And also that it’s a kind of a really common life [00:03:00] progression, and another reason why many male base campers should not be discounting progressive women and writing them off, which we see happening all the time.
But-
Oh yeah, people- Romy ... people are like, “Oh, you shouldn’t date someone to change them,” or whatever. People were so mad at my Leaflet video when I was like no, that’s, like, what... I’m just saying realistically, that is your pool of women these days.” Here’s what’s
really, really d- crazy though, is Romy Holland, this woman who went on to get married, you know, gang bang organizer Bay Area intelligent sex positive woman, has completely radicalized me on misoprostol and early term abortion.
Like, I’m complete, like, sea change for me against it. I, I used to be like, hey, basically until you get signs of, like, you know, a, a, a, a human life that is capable of experiencing pain, you know, like around, like week 12 you don’t really have, like, a, the beginnings of a brain, [00:04:00] I guess I’m okay with abortion.
You know, and especially, you know, just taking misoprostol if you need to ‘cause you’re super, super not ready. I have changed my view on this, and it, it wasn’t, it wasn’t our Catholic friends, it wasn’t our, our friends at the Heritage Foundation, it wasn’t anyone else. You got
ri- radicalized on abortion by a gang bang woman.
By, by yeah. By a, by a slapper at a gang bang. Well, she did, right? I mean, I was just
looking her up and the first thing that comes up with her is a bunch of magazine articles saying, “This heartbreaking what nobody told me about abortion essay is going viral.” It’s... I’m gonna read
some quotes from it.
We’re gonna start with, though, the, the romance, ‘ cause romance is dead. I love it so much. I love the story. So for those of you not familiar, who’ve somehow been living under a rock or w- I don’t know, were in a coma in 2024 Aella, who is a, a sex researcher, a friend- She’s done
episodes with us before.
She’s awesome ... I consider her one of my close friends. Yeah. Yeah. I- Other than Leaflet, [00:05:00] she’s one of the only people I’ve ever, like, when I talk to them I felt like an immediate and deep connection. She’s a great person.
Yeah, just incredible. Incredible person. She had a birthday party, and she was like, “You know what?
I would love to have a gang bang for my birthday party.” So some of her close friends so kindly and generously, including Romy Holland, Romy helped her organize it. And this, this was a very complicated thing. They decided ultimately on, on a, a, a, a very good number, 42 men. You know, it’s perfect sort of nerd reference gang bang number.
You know- 42
men? Oh my God,
Jerome ... Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy right there. I know, 42 men. We’re a
conservative
podcast, by the way, right? We are considered radical conservatives. That’s why I have to brief people on this, okay? Just in case they don’t know about the birthday gang bang. So- No, I’m just...
I, well, we have to admit that, like, we have friends who are w****s. Like we have to admit that. Like, we’re... Gosh, if only, I think we gotta, we gotta be more like Jesus and just never talk to w****s, right? Like, that’s clearly the right answer [00:06:00] here, right? Ai,
Simone Collins: yi, yi.
Malcolm Collins: No, I mean, winning people’s hearts requires not reflexively condemning them if they are attempting...
Because I think you see with this person, and in her abortion essay and stuff like this, th- this is not a community that’s hearts are truly poisoned. They just need the truth shown to them in the, in, in the, in the right way, and then it shocks them out of it, and that’s what happened with this individual.
But continue.
I mean, I don’t know. I just feel like it’s an, I, I went from being an ardent progressive, though not exactly sex positive, to just being, you know, now a conserv- Like, it’s a very natural and common progression. But anyway, so, Romy helped organize this, and th- there was a lot of vetting in this.
I, I think I remember looking through the survey for people applying. You know, they, they’re obviously going through the kinks of these people. In an interview with, on Slate’s podcast, Death, Sex, and Money Romy talks about the The, the kind of the unique [00:07:00] kink criteria they would go for. Like, they didn’t want men who needed, like, a lot of, like, reinforcement and like, “Oh,” like, “you’re doing so great.”
Well, because, you know, it’s a gang bang. It’s supposed to be, like, consensual non-consent, right? So, like, they can’t have men who are super needy who need Aella to, like, praise them, ‘cause that’s not the look of this event. So they had to, you know, vet for that. They need to vet for a bunch of other things.
Obviously, you know, if you’re a friend or something, like, you know, you’re probably in. So there was a lot of vetting involved. And then of course on the actual day of the party, you had to work through all the logistics. You know, there’s queuing, and you wanna have everyone, you know, sufficiently hard for the moment of, of, of, of bang.
And so then y- there’s a big bowl of Viagra at the door, but then there’s also the need for arousal, and that, that is where the fluffy... Sorry, where the fluffers come in, including Romy who very generously offered to participate in a very involved way in the fluffing process preparing men to deliver their birthday present to Aella.
I- if you haven’t explored [00:08:00] the, the lore around the gang bang, you definitely should. There was a, a very viral Sankey diagram that Aella had created, because, again, she is a very intellectual, fun, playful person. I should not have been
allowed at the gang bang. Do you remember why?
Oh, yeah, because you were n- y- something about Eliezer Yudkowsky.
Some- Yeah, yeah. So, so no accelerationists. No AI acceleration people were allowed. That’s right. Yes. It was
no... Yes, I remember. It was only AI doomers. That’s like something I was like, oh yeah, you definitely wouldn’t be allowed. So Aella made this, this chart that sort of showed what happened to the various participants.
So, she had the survey. You know, the application she released had 1,604 applicants. 828 failed the auto filter, 3 twen- 328 failed the manual filter, 776 passed the auto filter, 448 passed the manual fic- filter. They contacted 251 men, 143 didn’t respond, 25 are friends, 87 of those got invited. And also 83 did an interview.
Like it went, it went, it went, it went, and then 42 showed up, so they got 42. Only [00:09:00] 37 penetrated Aella. Only 17 came inside Aella. They were wearing condoms. Only well, five came inside a fluffer. Who knows if Romy was one of them. And then 15 didn’t come. So, the the, this is the thing was- Going to an
orgy and not coming?
Well, that, that sounds like- Well,
but Malcolm, this is a 42-person gang bang. S- it’s like the waiting- Although to be honest, I think if I went to an orgy- Like, it’s like, it’s like the being at the DMV, right? Like, you’re queuing, you’re waiting. Like, it’s awkward. There’s other people there. You know a lot of them, like, ‘cause a bunch of them were Aella’s friends.
Like, these are all... I mean, I guess those people are more accustomed maybe to more group-ish sex environments. But anyway, it was in this milieu, it was in this mix at this lovely party that a- that actually wasn’t particularly fun for Aella or Romy, per their reports that Romy locked eyes with a man that she was fluffing.
She’d known him online a little bit, you know, had seen him post. This is
what I don’t understand.
Yeah.[00:10:00]
If it’s not fun, okay? And presumably she’s done gang bangs before. Well, you don’t
know it. No, I don’t think she had. That’s the thing, is I don’t think she had. And so there’s this, like, well... ‘Cause think, think about to, to safely do a gang bang, if you’re actually, like, vetting it carefully and, and doing it right.
And, and keep in mind, like, again, the, this, this type of sex positive person in the Bay Area, in the ALA cinematic universe doesn’t just do, like, consensual non- Like, “Oh, let’s just mess around. Like, everyone, like, jump in the group.” No, no, no. At her consensual non-consent parties, you’re wearing a lanyard that says what you can do to someone and what you can’t do.
There are safe words. There are safety talks. Like, this stuff, people are vetted. There, there’s the, the stuff, the, the places, the careful location selection. These are incredibly thoughtful events. So no, I don’t think she had done one before. From my understanding, she hadn’t. And so sh- like, she wanted to try.
Like, she’s an, she’s a, she’s, she believes in experimentation. And so I, I don’t think she [00:11:00] knew that she wasn’t gonna find it particularly enjoyable.
I think that I should add this to our sins episode. Trying something only to try something. Well, but she might have liked it, and she- Well, you don’t need to know everything in the world you might like.
Even if it turned out I loved gang bangs, that is a fact I would not want to know about myself.
Well, and I guess, like, are, like, yeah. D- do you like- private jet flights. I guess that’s, that’s one of the bigger issues in my view. Like, I could love flying on a private jet, but can I afford to fly on a private jet?
Like, absolutely not. So they had such- Also, I don’t think I would ...
Simone Collins: enough to know. ‘
Malcolm Collins: Cause I once had to drop a bunch of people off on a private jet. I didn’t get to go on but I, I had to drop people off. So freaking loud. Like you- Wait, we never took you on our private
jet?
No. Oh. That was- That’s terrible
I was in the post private jet days when I entered your
family. Yeah, we, I guess they- I didn’t get to- ... they stopped using it as much because it’s inconvenient. But yeah private jets suck . [00:12:00] Yeah. They, they- they are so much
worse ... loud. It’s so loud on the tarmac. And like the airports for the private jets were like- It’s not just that it’s loud
like a bus sta- There’s this like- Like a Greyhound bus station. I’m like, “What is this?” If you’re talking about- “This is not what I
expected.” ... standard private jets, like Lear jets and stuff like that, right? They are significantly smaller than you would expect on the inside, especially for like the two rows.
Mm-hmm. So like your entire flight- Oh, you even see it.
Like when the, when the Kardashians fly on their private jet, like it’s a very nicely appointed private jet, but it’s small. It’s like, it’s... I mean, you’re- Yeah, the
entire flight your head is like cocked to the side- ... because it’s like against the side of the plane.
Well, th- okay, their
private jets are bigger than that. And okay, I did see the interior of, of wom- one of the lady’s private jets as I was dropping everyone off and, and hers was very nice, but she was also very wealthy. So but like it’s just, I don’t know, it just seemed uncomfortable and meh. But anyway, my point here though is what if Aella just...
I think it’d be worse if Aella really enjoyed the gang bang because then like how is she... Like oh great, like now I’m never gonna have fun again unless I, [00:13:00] I, I, I put out a 1,000 person survey and have like 10 of my friends work carefully around the clock to vet all these people and interview them and organize them.
And you know, of course, throughout the entire process, ‘cause she didn’t wanna put the, the onus on the participants to kind of just both like consensually, non-consensually penetrate her. She’d have two people with her the whole time like kind of watching her watching the men, make sure like nothing was going wrong, making sure that she was fully lubricated, handing the men the Sharpie, ‘cause I think, remember they had like a Sharpie there doing ticks on her leg to be like, “Number this, number that.”
I think they even, they did all these like really thoughtful things too. I think maybe there was a virgin there that one day and they’re like saying like they did a thing for him or like I can’t remember. But like this was incredibly thoughtfully executed. It’s not sustainable. So that’s my thing is maybe don’t try things if, if you can’t afford to like do them regularly if it’s trying this to see if you like it kind of thing.
Like you know- Do I like luxury cars? Like, I bet I do, but I can’t afford one, so let’s not get into that. You’re a weirdo. Anyway so they, [00:14:00] she, you know, encounters this man. Like, she had seen him posting around online, but I think this is also a very common illustration of how people meet now. This is a very techno-feudal kind of meet cute where, like, you see someone posting online, they’re in your general online sort of parasocial circles, and then at some special event, at some community-based gathering, which this very much was, right?
A mixture of sort of the online universe of a person and their offline friends coming together for a special event. You meet someone in that universe. You have some, some, some in-person chemistry, which you can’t necessarily find online. You know, you can’t gauge that, and it takes off from there. So, you know, it wasn’t immediate.
It wasn’t like, you know, he asked her out mid-penetration. Because I d- she, she was also, I think, doing, like, full penetrative fluffing not like, like hand job or b*****b fluffing, from my understanding. And anyway, they, they went later on [00:15:00] a date. And then they- Yeah ... they became like more like a steady boyfriend and girlfriend.
And then they had a kid together, and now not only are they engaged to be married soon but they’re also, for the time being at least, monogamous. And here you see this classic arc. The gang banging to monogamy trend. Well, no, the thing is, like, I think people don’t realize how common this is. Like, I, I am the product of of bro- a broken polyamorous marriage.
I guess it’s just like it wasn’t really well matched. And then my mom was one of, like a secondary for my dad. But then eventually she was like, “Look, I- this isn’t for me. Like, I wanna have a kid someday. Either I’m moving to Colorado or, like, maybe you decide that you wanna be monogamous with me. And my dad decided, at actually pretty significant social cost, like per everything that, you know, the disruption that that caused to become monogamous with my mother, and I’m a result of that.[00:16:00]
But, like, even back in the ‘80s, this was happening in the Bay Area. So this is a surprisingly trad kind of arc. And I’m really happy for Romie. I’m really happy for her partner. I’m really happy for their kid. But what I did not expect from this adorable and, in my opinion, very wholesome story, was that she would radicalize me against misoprostol, which I thought was like...
Now, you know my stance has been very consistent, that, like, up until 12 weeks, I don’t care. Like, whatever, you know, y- if you wanna take a pill to end a pregnancy early, like, this is not yet a,
a, a sentient, like, conscious- So, so for people who understand why we take this position, if you’re confused by this, I d- I, I do not think that you can h- when there’s no neural tissue, like, I don’t think I lost part of my soul by losing my finger or something like that, right?
Yeah. When there’s no neural tissue, there is nothing that can produce the effect that we in our society call a soul.
Yeah ... it, it- And we, we think it’s equally sinful as [00:17:00] techno-puritans to, like, choose not to have a kid when you could. It doesn’t matter if that’s before you have sex or after you have sex or after conception.
It’s, it’s, it’s, it’s a sin. Yeah, yeah, it’s not
that we don’t think that it’s bad to abort a fetus that has no neural tissue yet. Mm-hmm. But we think it’s at the same level of evil as convincing somebody not to get IVF that was going to do IVF. Yeah. Because you have prevented a child that was going to exist from existing, and all child on that spectrum, whenever somebody goes like, “I could have made the child”- And- That’s why we took that position, but just- And then there’s,
there’s, yeah, the sort of additional, like, layer on top of that for me of like, okay, well, when are you, when are you sort of committing murder and causing, like, suffering to a thing?
And, you know, yeah, after week 12, you are causing suffering to a thing. Like, huh. So like, that, that just adds this extra, like, visceral... But now, now I’m really questioning this, and I wanna give you some, some quotes from Romie’s [00:18:00] experience going through this because I think she, this is what, this is what radicalized me, and I think it shows some lies that are told to progressives especially, but I think just to main screen, mainstream participants in the urban monoculture more broadly about About basically early term abortions.
I had no idea. I am kind of horrified. And I, I, it, it shows how we’ve basically been lied to, and that there is a ton of damage that no one talks about, and I feel like maybe f- people feel afraid to talk about. So I’ll just go ahead and read. But- No, let’s go
Simone Collins: into it.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. You can also, and I, ‘cause it’s amazing writing.
Romie’s very articulate, incredibly intelligent, like beautiful, wonderful person in general. So I recommend you read the full thing. It’s titled it’s her only Substack article too What Nobody Told Me About Abortion, and it describes her harrowing experience. So basically she she had sex with her boyfriend and got [00:19:00] pregnant.
She wrote, “On the sort of afternoon a full ripe summer fruit, my new boyfriend and I, still flush with sweat and limerence after some midday sex, started an ovulation test strip and realized we’d misread an earlier test. ‘Uh-oh,’ I said, lightly amused, and 1,000 rom-com moments flashed through my mind.” Cue the clueless horror movie protagonist who fails to notice the ax murderer behind the bedroom door, mistaken about the genre of the story unfolding.
We listened to music, and I swiveled back and forth in an office chair while narrating ChatGPT’s damning answers to my questions about fertile windows and test strip line darkness. My boyfriend kissed me on the cheek each time he walked past. We riffed about games we could play at our abortion party.
Our decision calculus was numerical, emotions an afterthought. Our abortion
Simone Collins: party? This, and this goes to show, like- I think she’s showing how radically
Malcolm Collins: her mind shifted over time ... yeah, like,
Simone Collins: the, the flippant
Malcolm Collins: jokiness that, no, that like, that urban [00:20:00] monoculture San Francisco Bay Area people are raised with around the idea of abortions, and why people are so, like, pro-abortion.
It’s like, really like it goes back to that BoJack Horseman Aquafina, like, “Get that fetus, kill that fetus.”
Speaker 17: America, get your uteruses tarp.
Speaker 19: I’m a baby killer. Baby killer makes me horny.
Speaker 18: Get that fetus, kill that fetus.
Speaker 19: Down face, b*****s in my cross face. No, I’ma have abortions always.
Speaker 18: And sometimes I do have doubts I hope and pray to God it don’t feed us as a song. Cause I want it to feel pain when I eject it from my own world.
, has the concept of women having choices gone too far?
Malcolm Collins: Like, the, this like- Yeah ... euphoric cultural, like, this is a sacred cow kind of attitude around abortion, and it’s euphoric, this idea that I have this choice, and like, we’re gonna exercise this choice and it’s gonna be funny and cool.
Speaker 2: Trans woman to have a successful uterus [00:21:00] transplant, ovaries and eggs included. And I want to be the first trans woman to have an abortion.
Speaker 3: Mrs. Garrison.
You can’t have an abortion.
Speaker 4: Don’t you tell me what I can and can’t do with my body! A woman has a right to choose!
Speaker 3: You can’t get pregnant.
Speaker 4: But I missed my period.
Speaker 3: You can’t have periods either.
Speaker 4: You mean, I’ll never know what it feels like to have a baby growing inside me and then scramble its brains and vacuum it out? This would mean I’m not really a woman, it’s, I’m just a, I’m just a guy with a mutilated penis!
Speaker 3: Basically, yes.
Speaker 4: Oh boy, do I feel like a jackass.
Malcolm Collins: I’ll continue reading. Our decision calculus was numerical, emotions an afterthought. There’s a one in four chance of conception each month, so deciding not to take Plan B would result in a 25% risk of needing an abortion. Plan B costs $50, and an abortion costs 500, but only with [00:22:00] a 25% chance of conception.
The expected value of that option is $125. Plan B and early stage abortion seemed physically pretty similar. Nothing to consider there. “If you get pregnant, we’d both know we’re fertile,” my boyfriend pointed out. “True. Why would anyone pl- pay for fertility testing with such thrilling alternative available?”
I quipped back. In the end, my sense that failing to take Plan B seemed plainly stupid led us to swing by CVS on our way to an under the sea themed party in San Francisco. I was wearing a black and gold ballgown. He, a shimmery jacket that made him look like an undiscovered mayor culture dredged up from the fluorescently lit family planning aisle.
Later at the party, I recounted our ill-fated afternoon with punchlines as I pried open the clamshell package and unceremoniously swallowed the Plan B in my friend’s cozy kitchen So she, you [00:23:00] know, is very, like, casual about the sex, about the you know, “I’m ju- I’ll just take Plan B,” right? You know, this is a very, like, expected experience for someone in the, like- Yeah
this culture. Then she describes how it goes south. So basically, she got a positive pregnancy test nine days later. And she, just, like, from the beginning, it was, like, obvious she would not be having a baby. Like, there, there was no question that, like, well, obviously. Like, we’re not, we’re not even gonna consider carrying this.
She, she wrote, “Ignoring the mounting calm of my instinctual self, I walked across Berkeley on a chilly August evening to pick up abortion pills from the sort of friend who people think of when they say they know a guy.” She continued a little bit later. I’m, I’m skipping through the article. You really should read the whole thing.
Yeah. “Nobody talks about the hell that is misoprostol, the abortion pill. I suspect that in its politicization, no one wants to mention that the drug in question is a sledgehammer. On its quest to destroy the fetus, it obliterates the mother as well. On Thursday afternoon, I [00:24:00] unceremoniously took the first of three doses.
Four little white pills shoved into my vagina as far up as I could wedge them. Tiny bombs placed quietly beside the cradle where my unsuspecting baby slept. I waited, fever rising, for the bleeding that should have started an hour, after an hour or two. The second dose came and went. By dose three, I could barely move.
I took the stairs one at a time, weakly gripping the railing, my joints aching with each step, the inside of my mouth painfully raw. Curled in bed, I whispered for more and more blankets, shivering and only dimly aware of my boyfriend there beside me, searching the internet for answers about my racing heart and shallow, rapid breathing.
In the morning, I felt drained, but the fever and pain were gone. The large maxi pad, which the internet warned I may soak as often as once per hour, was entirely dry.” So she goes on to observe that, quote, “Misoprostol as an abortion protocol is 85% effective. As the 24-hour time point neared [00:25:00] and I felt not even the slightest cramping, it became clear that I was among the unlucky 15% of women for whom a second attempt would be necessary.”
And she also writes, “In, in taking the first dose of pills, I’d started down an inescapable path and had no choice but to march to its end. As a friend would later say, the correct number of abortions is either zero or as many as it takes.” And this is, Malcolm, for me, like, reading about this is so scary, ‘cause one of my, I’ve never told you this, but one of my recurring, like, nightmares that I’ve had since childhood is, like, finding some innocent injured animal that’s in pain, and then attempting to kill it to put it out of its pain and, and failing every time and making it worse every time.
Like, this is one of my, like, deepest set fears. Like- It’s
funny, I have a, th- such different deep set fears than you. Yeah. W- I don’t know if I ever told you this one. One, one of my recurring nightmares, up until I met you, I haven’t had this dream since I met you. Oh. But it used to be a [00:26:00] big recurring nightmare for me was that I had accidentally killed someone and I needed to figure out what to do next.
Oh, no.
Simone Collins: And I was
Malcolm Collins: just like, “We gotta hide the body. We gotta like...”
Yeah. We have different nightmares. But like this is my worst nightmare. And of like if I had gone through this and I felt like I had only partially killed this, this fledgling life.
And then it humanizes it for you, and you’re like, “Oh, my God, this is my baby.
What was I doing? Why did I treat this so flippantly?” Yeah,
you, you’re... Yeah, just, just wait. So she, she ultimately had to do four rounds. She went to Planned Parenthood in San Francisco. She wrote, “Desperation welled inside me. I wanted to grip her...” Oh so basically also a protester confronted her and was like, you know, “Don’t kill your baby.”
About that she wrote, “Desperation welled inside of me. I wanted to grip her bony shoulders, to look her in the eye and ask her what she would have me do with this broken, beautiful thing inside me that had survived six doses of poison and now failed to die.” My [00:27:00] worst nightmare. You can tell I’m like so scared.
“More abortion pills, more waiting, more shivering in a ball of feverish torment. Still no blood.” Then she continued ‘cause she had to ultimately get a D&C. “My memories of the surgical D&C procedure four days later come to me in fragments that feel sharp in my chest. I remember a cold wand pushed inside me, searching for a smudge of evidence of, of the baby, and then a room with a chair and an iPad video that soothingly warned of hysterectomy risk.”
I didn’t, also, I didn’t know that. “Finally, a room that smelled of chemicals where I sat on a crisp paper and stared at a tray strewn with ominous medical instruments. Panic. Through this I did not move. Tears gathered in my eyes at the inevitability of the situation, my overwhelming helplessness. I presented my arm to the pretty young nurse who would administer the fentanyl and sedatives.
I laid down and spread my legs for the kind practitioner to vacuum out my stubborn baby. What’s a mother to do in a moment like this but carry her child gently to the executioner’s arms?” And then [00:28:00] she, She asked if she could, you know, like take the th- you know, the baby that they removed and, like, bury it in her backyard or something.
And they’re like, “No, we’re forced by California law to take them all to funeral homes?” I don’t know what they do with them there. That’s... I don’t get that. But anyway, she met, after this process happened, other people who like when she mentioned it to them were like, “Oh yeah, I have also had a traumatic experience with this.”
And I think this is one of those other things where the people- Because in
progressive circles you’re supposed to be euphoric about it. It’s supposed to be- Yeah, like you
can’t... It’s, yeah, it’s, it’s verboten to say that you had a bad experience with mifepristone. You can’t say it. But then she said, she wrote “I recently had coffee with a friend who became very still when I mentioned my abortion.
Tears sprang to her eyes as she told me that once she’d had an abortion too, and although it was seven years ago, and although she never wanted the baby, never even wanted to be a mother, it still makes her cry every time she remembers it. She’d taken the abortion [00:29:00] pills and two days later, in a grungy dive bar bathroom with music thrumming through the door, she’d found her clot of a baby in her bloody pad.”
Th- this is, I’m sorry, like, I guess trigger warning a while ago. Stop if so. Trigger warning a
while ago. No, but this is how you get people. No, no, no,
no, no, no, no. Wait, wait, wait. Well,
one way to win was the gang bang story. I know. Then you traumatize them about getting an abortion. Then, but I cry if I
talk about abortions.
What on earth? But anyway, this radi- this radicalized me. Did you ever think you would be this woman crying talking about abortions to other, to try to get women to like...
I’m not trying to do this. This really radicalized me, and her writing is really good. Anyway so she, this woman just told her, you know, she found the bloody clot in this dive bar in her pad.
She says, “ ‘I knew I had to eat it,’ she told me. And then as though suddenly realizing that this might sound absurd, she tried to explain, ‘I mean, I couldn’t just leave it in that dirty bathroom. It was my baby. What was I going to do, throw it in the trash?’ I stopped her, shaking my head. ‘No, no, it makes perfect sense [00:30:00] to me.
It really does. Of course you had to eat it. It was your baby.’ The maternal logic of this was unassailable. Anyone who’s been a mother for any stretch of time would not question such a primordial urge. The animal mother knows what to do, and your judgments are not what carried evolution billions of... Oh, and your judgments are not what carried evolution billions of years to this moment.
‘So what did you do?’ I asked her. ‘I ate it,’ she said, wide-eyed.” S- and like Malcolm, this sounds so insane, but I completely understand what they’re talking about And it makes me think of like, the hamsters that go crazy and eat their babies. There’s something that, yeah, is really, like mentally unstable about pregnancy and, and I didn’t realize that messing with it in this way like this early in pregnancies could mess women up so much.
‘Cause it gets worse. B- if you can believe it. And then- Oh my God. Our audience,
Simone Collins: did we lure them in with “Hey guys”? I’m so sorry, guys.
Malcolm Collins: I’m so... “
Simone Collins: Hey guys, gang bang. Ha ha ha.”
Hey, so funny.
Malcolm Collins: So after this she, she basically [00:31:00] had a psychotic episode. She, she wrote, and again I’m skipping around, read the whole thing, “I was not permitted to eat my baby nor bring it home in a little vial to bury it or put it on the mantle or inspect it under a microscope for a tail.
Perhaps if I’d been, the cataclysmic crash of hormones that awaited me would have taken a gentler shape. Instead, in the days that followed, I began to experience borderline psychotic episodes. These hours-long periods would begin with a vague sense of unease and build-” and build until the world around me became twisted and surreal, like a haunted house.
Sometimes anger at my boyfriend would inexplicably slow- swell inside me, sharp and alienating, distancing me from the one person who might understand my pain. Often I was consumed with an urgent need to go find my missing baby. My thoughts would enter obsessive sprent- frenzied spirals about the desire, running through the sequence of events that had led to my baby’s departure from my womb, where it clearly belonged.
My memories of the [00:32:00] D&C churned with an ominous bent. The kindness of the nurses suddenly felt coercive, like they had conspired to place me under a spell so that they could use the strange and powerful devices to remove a precious, integral part of me. And then so she, she goes to Burning Man which happens m- like, on late Memorial Day weekend in, like, the beginning of September, ‘cause this is all end of summer.
Mm-hmm. And she, she basically tried to deal with this by sort of, like, through the, the Bay Area equivalent of, like, a, a grieving ceremony. At Burning Man there’s, like, the big man that they burn, but there’s also this place called the temple where you can, like... And I’ve been to Burning Man once.
I remember going to it. It’s this, like, beautiful structure, but it’s where you kind of, like, you will have I’m vaguely remembering this like traumatic things. Like, y- you’ll burn the things that, that bother you. And so she, she tries to staple the one thing she had left of this baby, which was her positive pregnancy test strip to the temple, and then it, you know, like, having it burned, like, and hopefully that, like, will get rid of her trauma.
[00:33:00] One, one thing she wrote also that stood out to me, she wrote, “Before I was a mother, I was a woman who belonged entirely to herself. I finally understood then that my baby was gone and that I was once again alone.” Oh my gosh, what? Sorry.
Can you see that this stuff messes women up? But you may not want more babies.
It’s people who have babies, the moment you get radicalized by babies, you’re just like, “I need maximum number of babies.”
No, see, I didn’t know that you could get radicalized before the baby came out ‘cause I didn’t, I didn’t know. But something really messes with women, and this, this article shows that.
It turns out that while full-blown postpartum psych- she, here I’m reading from her writing again. “It turns out that while full-blown postpartum psychosis is rare, subclinical psychotic thoughts are common, affecting 15 to 30% of women who give birth, and less commonly following abortion and miscarriage.
Critically, people experiencing these thoughts retain insight into the fact that their thoughts are distorted, though such knowledge does not [00:34:00] immunize them to suffering. It’s strange to me that given the prevalence of postpartum depression and abortion, I haven’t heard anyone talk openly about either.
My concept of abortion was shaped instead through divisive political narratives, which leave me feeling trapped between absolutes and how I’m allowed to talk about it, forced to hedge every statement.” I mean, she still supports the, the right to choose, and there’s all these complications, but she’s trying to introduce nuance to the conversation.
And, like, even to the, to the day that she wrote this article she still is dealing with the grief of this abortion. She wrote... Oh, mister. She wrote, “My grief is- I
think this is a good article to... And I’m gonna do this for our kids. Yeah. I think around the time they go through puberty, I think this article should be part- They need to read this
of sex education and having to write an essay on this. 100%. And I would introduce this, I think at around the age of, let’s say, 14. When you
have your period. No, when you have your period. That’s when you- Yeah ... should be reading it. I’ll just- Yeah ... leave with,
What a great thing [00:35:00] just to make part...
And I, and I actually, I like this so much, I’m gonna say, like, if you’re a religious person or whatever like that, and you have, like, a religious school or something like that, can we advocate for making this a major part of the just
Simone Collins: telling- Yeah, ‘cause again, it’s not, it’s not all the... N- no,
Malcolm Collins: no Catholic or Protestant or Jew has ever convinced me, despite, like, presenting many, like, cohesive arguments of...
Like, this, this made me cry. You saw. I can’t help but cry, and this isn’t my first time reading it. You know, this isn’t, like, the initial shock. This is just me, like... And, and it had pr- pr- probably something to do with the fact that, like, I, I have been radicalized by pregnancy as well. But, like, just the, the impact this has had on her.
She, she writes “My grief has settled into a shape small enough to carry around the world. It goes with me to dinner and seems to like it when we take evening walks around the neighborhood. Sometimes when I know it won’t cause [00:36:00] too much trouble, I take it out and marvel at it. It’s heavier than it looks.
The weight of it on my chest enough to knock the breath out of me if I’m not prepared. Many nights, my grief unfurls and wraps w- its long tendrils around me. I wake sweating and tangled in my blankets, planets still bright in the sky. Soon enough it will learn to sleep through the night.” Like, she’s still suffering from it.
And I think she- Oh.
Simone Collins: Okay, okay. G, are you thirsty? Sorry, one moment here
Your bottle has disappeared.
Malcolm Collins: She, I think her story also adds weight to the techno-puritan sense that damage lies in, like, action-based inflection points, and less at, like, some definition of where life begins or where suffering begins, and this is where I, I’m also, like, moderating my views of, like, where the sin lies and where the damage is done.
She wrote, “I never quite understood regret. Should the [00:37:00] butterfly regret a flap of its wings upon learning of the resulting tornado? Still, as the shadow of loss looms over my days, I’ve started to think I probably would have been happier in this alternate lifeline, life timeline in which my grief would be balanced by purpose.
Whether this will feel true five years from now is harder to say. Perhaps one should wait to see what is built from the tornado’s wreckage before declaring regret. I find myself trying to calculate this likelihood, but quickly stop. I know now that some arithmetic belongs to older gods than reason.”
And so, She’s a really good writer
she has a kid now, right? She got... When did she give birth?
I d- I don’t know the exact date, but yeah, she has a kid, she has a kid now. She has a kid now. She’s gonna get married. She’s monogamous. This, this is a happy ending. Everything’s okay . And you’re like, “Oh my God.” I know, man.
But, like- But it’s important to remember that sex can lead to kids.
Ba- gang bangs can lead to kids, right? Like, everything that she’s participating in around something like this can [00:38:00] lead to a woman getting pregnant, and then having to well, either carry the kid to term or make a horrifying choice that could lead to this. And progressives aren’t really told, and I wasn’t really told when I was a kid, because I’m gonna be honest, Christians are cucking terrible at terrifying kids out of abortions.
They’re just like, “You’re murdering a human.” And I’m like, “It doesn’t have neurons.” Like, that is so uncompelling to somebody
who doesn’t have neurons. Yeah, I think that that’s a really, a big thing for me, too, is yeah, like, they keep being like, “It’s a human. It’s a human. It’s a human.” And I’m like, “Well, not...
Like, actually, no. Like, it’s, it, it doesn’t a brain yet. You know, like, it’s It’s like, mm, you know Like, yeah, I am
my thoughts, right? Like- Yeah ... fundamentally, I’m not really my body. I could lose any part of my body and I’m still 100% me. If I lost a part of my brain, I would be fractally me. I wouldn’t be fully me anymore. If my brain significantly changed, I would be a different version of myself.
Like, it [00:39:00] is our neurons, at least this is to me, a regular person. The reason why I’m laying this out is when you go to your kids, many of your kids are gonna think this way, and you go to your kids and you just say Abortion is bad. And, and again, even the lines they use don’t really work for them. “I knew you before you were in your mother’s womb.”
Well, that, that doesn’t imply that life begins immediately at conception. That actually implies something quite different, that either souls exist in heaven before ensoulment or God can see into the future, both of which do not imply that life begins at conception, right? You know, so, e- they would, they would imply other things, right?
And then, then, then the question becomes when does ensoulment happen and everything like that. What this has radicalized me on is it’s... There are still instances in which... And keep in mind, this is the vast minority of abortion. When people are like, “Abortion because of rape,” or something like that, is less than 1% of abortion cases.
That is not what people are fighting for. But I think it works to just [00:40:00] take that off the table. Just say, “Okay, let’s not say, ‘Okay, in the case of rape...’”
Or a, a non-viable, Or non-viable ... they... Well, I think it... So, so we have to... And, and like, think again. Things need to be parsed out, right? Like, there’s, there’s s- yeah, some of these really extreme cases.
There’s also, like, cases in which what we’re really discussing is euthanasia of a terminally ill human. It doesn’t matter, like... And this is where I’m like, I’m, I’m standing out. Oh, no, Simone loves euthanasia, and, like, I know a lot of you guys really hate the idea of euthanasia. But I, truly loving human life, human flourishing, and es- especially innocent babies personally would want the right to spare one of my children intense suffering and pain and a short life.
You know, if like, you know, hours of intense suffering and then death after carrying a pregnancy to term, like, I would rather euthanize that baby of ours. Like, personally. But I, I would say
that this has radicalized [00:41:00] me on general use of- Yeah ... of, of this. No.
No. Yeah, no. Like, before I was like, “Whatever, it’s a pill.
Like, take the pill. It’s, it’s a...” No, man. Like, I had no i- I had no idea. And, and recreational sex because- I mean, yeah, this is... People have told us, they’re like, “Oh, well, you know, misoprostol’s actually, like, a really intense medication.” And I’m like, “I don’t...” Like, yeah, but like, I know people who are like, “Ugh, I took antibiotics.
My tummy hurts.” Like, people, like, overreact. This is
what... And w- I think it’s not just on... This has radicalized me against recreational sex because this is what recreational sex leads to, right? I, I think- Yeah, like I
said, we think that non-procreative sex is a sin, and this is why. Like, well, many reasons, but this is another reason why
Yeah.
Speaker 7: Note here, I’m not talking about, , anything that couldn’t get you pregnant. For example, , oral sex or kinky sex, , where it’s just like leaning into the kink. And I think for that reason, I’m more pro that stuff than I was historically and more [00:42:00] anti-general vanilla, more boring sex. I see that as dramatically more immoral than the kinkiest of kinky stuff, , because the kinkiest of kinky stuff is just to get you off, whereas vanilla sex could accidentally get somebody pregnant
Speaker 8: And I’d even lay this down as a religious thing from our perspective, the techno Puritan perspective for those who actually follow our religion, , lean in to the kinky stuff, lean in to the erotic stuff, lean out of the generic boring sex stuff, because that’s the stuff that can lead to you accidentally having to being in a position where it might make sense for somebody to think about murdering a human being
Malcolm Collins: It is really first recreational sex doesn’t even feel that good. It’s like I, this is one of the biggest myths I wanna blow out of the table here. Look, this is apparently
my failure. It can feel very good. I guess I’m not doing my job here. Well, I have
had sex with, and again, like my backstory is I used to sleep around all the time.
I’ve had sex with well over 100 women, probably around [00:43:00] 160. If I like try to get it up, I, I think it, it, I mean, I remember I stopped counting and I think it was like 120 was the last time I did a full count, and I slept with quite a few people after that, so it must be quite a bit more than that. Did any of them ever get pregnant?
If they did, they never told me. But like I didn’t understand the, I just thought sex is sex. So again, this is not a Simone is bad thing, it’s that when you actually do it enough or you go around and sleep around enough, this isn’t a Simone... When I mentioned this on the Leaflet stream, everyone was like, in the comments, they were like, “Y- yeah, he’s right.
It’s just like not differentially that much better than masturbation.” You know, it’s, it’s, it’s fine. It’s, it’s maybe 250% better than masturbation. But like when you consider the- Oh, cost-benefit
analysis though, and that’s what’s so crazy is like there was that one section of her, her post where they’re like, well, you know, if we do like a weighted cost of plan B versus like misoprostol [00:44:00] or like an abortion, like $200 versus $50 but weighted for the odds.
Like they’re doing most of the calculation. They’re just not taking it the rest of the way there of like here’s the downside cost of having recreational sex versus, you know, like the benefit of it. Comp- contrast that to the downside cost of just masturbating. Yeah.
Yeah. This is why I’m like, this is why I’m so against people who push against masturbation.
If masturbation prevents recreational sex, masturbation is good when you consider the enormous downside of recreational sex which, which I think th- this really highlights. By the way, rfab.ai, our AI service, offers really great not safe for work image and video generation, as well as not safe for work storytelling and scenarios, so you can experience your craziest monster F her scenario, you crazy, horny women out there.
Speaker 9: So I’ve been dramatically working to improve the site’s ability to both produce not [00:45:00] safe for work art and not safe for work videos. And, , right now, it should be live, , today. , There’s still some updates we have to do on the compression, the auto compression stuff, but automatic anime dubbing, , which is kinda cool that I, I-- You know, we’re one of the first to bring that to you
Speaker 10: You talking so seriously. It seems you haven’t decided on the next place to go. How utterly ridiculous. If you’re going to worry about that, why not just make the next customer the same race, huh? Oh, I see. Not bad. Then let’s go with that. Wait, you’re hiring them? Man, we really can’t decide on anything today.
Speaker 13: Oh, welcome. Oh, welcome
Speaker 11: A golem, huh?
Speaker 14: We recently had a fan reach out to us to be like, “Wow, you guys are always [00:46:00] talking about this RFAB thing, so I finally decided to try it.” And then they were like, “Well, and I ended up spending all day on it. It was a lot of fun.” , And, ,, they then said it was too easy, like the games, the game worlds always sort of worked for them.
So if that happens to you, on the site, use the ExoTop engine. , That engine is sort of like the anti-cheat engine. I don’t like it because I like cheating. I like the narrative going in the direction I choose to l-- You know, I, I sort of impose those limits on myself when I’m playing a scenario. But for the people who don’t like to impose that, the ExoTop engine, , narrative engine is the right one.
, Oh, and the recipe generator is really cool now. The super search feature is really cool. There’s just so many fun things you can try on the website. But the wider point here being is I’m not anti-eroticism. , Or we are not anti-eroticism. We are not anti-kink. We are not anti-, you know, getting your freak on.
What we are anti is the type of sex that can lead to an abortion. [00:47:00] This is evil, and I think that by drawing this distinction as a society, it is easier to convince kids that we are not telling them this because we are being fuddy-duddies, but we are telling them it because it is something that is true
You can be as dirty as you want, but sex is sinful
Malcolm Collins: Or what a guys want. A scenario where a woman loves and cares about you.
Oh my God
You know, a scenario where you s- where, where you rizz up your favorite online celebrity. You can just create a version of them and then use the internet search version of Grok, which none of the other sites have, and you can, you can talk to them on the...
No, but like, this hasn’t radicalized me into all of the conservative positions, but certainly against this. And I think with a lot of this stuff it’s like she didn’t even like the gang bang, right? Like Ayla didn’t even like the
story. Well, but no, no, no, no, no. I mean, ultimately the gang bang, I would say has, [00:48:00] has led to the production of at least one human life, Yes
and a marriage, and to, you know, a happy couple. Like, what, what, what better gift would you want from a gang bang? It’s, it’s beautiful. So You should, you should
reach out to her to be, like, in our network. She sounds sane and intelligent and like, I think our communities could be a good place for her.
‘Cause I, I bet she’s still completely surrounded by progressives, right? She doesn’t feel like- Well, she lives
in Berkeley.
Yeah, I mean Having the thoughts that she has, you know, be like, look, there’s a lot of us, sister. Like, join our community. Not, not, not for the sad part, but for the euphoric part of building civilization, right?
Well, you don’t know she’s not. She follows us on X, so maybe she already has.
Oh yeah, maybe she’s already in our community. I mean, I’ve met other women. See our EA to sex worker pipeline, where I felt so bad for some of the women in the EA space that just had their life ruined by this because they’re just like, “I thought that this is how you were cool as a woman is recreational sex.
I thought [00:49:00] that this was cool when I was in those communities.” And they didn’t realize how much it impacted the types of men who had settled down with them, right? And I think also seeing her conversion out of this, I think shows that for a lot of these people, it’s our failure, the conservative movement’s failure to communicate to them.
It is our failure that we- Well, it’s politicized too. Like, a lot of it’s the,
the radicalization of it. The, the, one of the reasons why people aren’t discussing the, the downside risk of taking this pathway is that it is so politicized. You don’t wanna give fodder to, like, I guess, rightist extremists who are gonna be like, “Exactly.
That’s why you can’t have, like, abortions.” You know, they’re gonna be intolerable if someone admits this. It’s a very third rail thing. And I don’t think she’s conservative, like, now suddenly
because of this. But no, what I’m saying is the way that the right, the way that the right communicates with people is just wrong.
It’s bad. It’s [00:50:00] bad at communication. It’s bad at communicating why abortion is bad. The, the, the words and logic that’s used fails at step one for a woman like this, and it is our responsibility ultimately. And people can say, like, “Why are we responsible and she’s not responsible?” We are responsible and she’s not responsible because I can’t control somebody else’s actions.
But I can control my actions, so it’s always useful for me to take personal responsibility, and I can influence a movement’s actions. I’m not influencing leftists. I’m influencing rightists. So I’m saying you, to the larger right-wing space that we influence, we do a bad job at communicating why these things are moral negatives.
And it’s good for us to look at a story like this and be like, imagine if it doesn’t work, because there’s an X percent chance that it doesn’t work. How are you going to feel, right? And then you have to go through with it, because you’ve [00:51:00] already ruined that child’s life. Well, I mean, you might decide that you don’t, and that’s a whole other scenario, but you have ruined the child’s life and you’re gonna have to live with that for the rest of your life.
That’s also horrifying. But like the moment you take this, like actually think through what this means. And more so, do that for casual sex more broadly. Think through the actual benefits you get out of it, and the actual negatives that could come downstream of this, and are you willing to take on this moral responsibility?
And it is wild to me that all these, quote-unquote, “effective altruists” are doing these orgies and everything like that without fully considering what this could mean for them as individuals. And I think we just fail to communicate to them, and I- I’m gonna do better to do that in the future. I’m trying to think, like, what’s the way to like sum this up?
Yeah, I think the way to sum this up is the way that I’ll be addressing abortion in the future is, what if you take the pill and it doesn’t [00:52:00] work? Like, talk me through how that feels. And then you get a crying baby like this little b*****d. Look, he’s not even happy with his little toy. He’s trying to eat it monster.
Yeah, he’s... I, I need to f- his, his bottle rolled away. What’s he upset about? I, I think he... Well, he, he woke up hangry and I- his bottle fell and I can’t access it ‘cause I’m- Okay ... stuck to the microphone Well, I’ll let you go.
You did a spectacular job with this episode. It’s one of my favorites that we’ve done.
It’s one of my mo- It’s, it’s all
thanks to Romy. I just like, I... Well, I mean, you and I, we really like, we appreciate when our minds are changed, when we get better information. And as much as it hurt for me to, like, read this terrible experience I really, really appreciate getting information that gives me, that ma- that moves me in a slightly less wrong direction in life.
So. So you,
I love you, Malcolm
I love you too. I’m so glad that Tech survived. He was, yeah, really touch and go there, and almost died in the hospital [00:53:00] too.
Yeah.
Does he still have the big scar from where they put the thing in to help his lungs? Yeah.
Yeah. Th- you could... Yeah, it’s, I, I wonder if he’s just always gonna have that you can
see it.
I mean, even if he does, you know, quite a-
Yeah, makes you look kinda, kinda tough. Like-
Modern medicine saved me, you know? This is the world that we’re in. Let’s, let’s try to save it, okay? All of you guys, let’s try to save it. Yeah. Let’s do our best.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And this also just makes me reflect a lot more on communication.
We’ve gotta get better at communication, and delivering these messages to the right people at the right stages of their life. Mm. Not just to be a community afterwards. So let’s think about how we do that better.
Sounds good to me. All right. I’ll go start dinner. All right.
Love you, Simone.
Love you too.
Speaker 16: You gotta sneak up on him. Can you be sneaky?
I want that. You can do it, just be sneaky and patient, [00:54:00] okay? I can’t. Maybe I can help you. We’ll see. Can you help me please? Aw, thanks for asking them nicely. Let’s see what I can do to help.
Speaker 15: They love that bird that we put so much, so now they love it They do. I’m gonna see if I can hang it up, ‘cause now it’s just sitting on the ground. So look, Tex brought this string that he’s been holding onto, and we’re gonna try to use that to tie it up for them. What do you think? Yeah? Yeah, thanks, Indy.
Speaker 16: You’re gonna help me string it up, yeah? I’m trying to pull it. Okay. ‘Cause I’m pulling it up. Exactly.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this Based Camp episode, Malcolm and Simone Collins break down the rapid decline in support for Pride events and LGBT causes. From NPR reporting on corporations pulling sponsorships to Gallup polls showing consistent drops in approval for same-sex marriage and especially gender transition, they explore why public opinion has shifted so dramatically.
They discuss cultural overreach, grooming concerns in schools, transgender issues and violence, the “groomer” label’s effectiveness, and why even many Democrats are turning away. The Collinses offer a nuanced conservative perspective: supporting gay rights as a private matter while rejecting enforcement on others, and arguing why keeping competent gay conservatives in the broader movement makes strategic sense.
Plus: family moments with Octavian, the evolution of Pride from fun to corporate/ugly, birth rates and political heritability, Don’t Say Gay bill realities, and a deep dive into the Bricks & Minifigs scandal.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be talking about how corporations- Oh ... have stopped supporting sort of the wider gay and LGBT agenda, to the extent that NPR, NPR of all places, wrote an article titled, and I just have to show you the cover image on this article.
It’s hilarious.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Pride celebrations struggle as corporate sponsorships dry up.
Simone Collins: Oh
Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah, also, also
Simone Collins: in this And this coming at Pride Month when like... Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: sad ‘Cause it’s exactly who you expect.
Just like the image, the people in the image is like, oh my God, I wanna hate
Simone Collins: these people so much.
Oh, hold on, I’m looking. Oh, boy. No, if that’s what Pride is now, let’s just let it go. Sorry though, we loved the glasses. We loved the glasses, but we,
Malcolm Collins: you know. This is w- hold on, it’s not just that. This is the only other picture in the article, too.
Fat old women is, is what I guess Pride is now. Oh,
Simone Collins: no, [00:01:00] no.
It’s- No ...
Malcolm Collins: fat misshapen old women
Simone Collins: No. I will nev- the first time I ever came across, across a Pride parade, I was in Cape Cod I think it’s Provincetown, or Princetown? Provincetown. But yeah, in Cape Cod, and I didn’t, we didn’t know that there was a Pride parade. We were camping there I was camping there with a, a friend and her dad.
And then just on the main street of Provincetown just was this really cool parade, and the most beautiful women I had ever seen. And I was stunned and amazed, and I, I didn’t know why all these beauty queens were suddenly marching along this picturesque New England street. And it turns out they were just all drag queens, and that was it.
I loved, I loved it. I loved it all. I thought it was the best thing in the world. And what has it become now? I mean, like in the past 10 years it’s been like the Bank of America float, and then a bunch of like ugly people on it. Like that, what is that? Who made Pride ugly? Like, no, Pride was always hot.
Pride was always fun. Pride meant like f- [00:02:00] cool, fun, entertaining, sometimes salacious stuff, but often like more wholesome than anything else. I’m kind of glad that whatever Pride become is dying, and I think that’s kind of how everyone feels, which is why it’s plummeting in popularity.
Malcolm Collins: So we’re going to be talking about this, and the other thing we’re gonna be talking about is some recent statistics that came out that show a rapid reduction in the support of things like gay marriage across the United States.
A rapid reduction in... I mean, we’re not even, you know, talking about, like, broader trans stuff here, just, like, support for gay rights more generally in the United States. This is something that I personally find you know, is interesting for me to come to because historically I’ve always been pretty pro maintaining gay rights, even just as, like, a...
Well, most Republicans are for gay rights these days, and with the majority of Republicans being pro-gay rights, it doesn’t make sense to even, like, bring up a question of, like, should that be something that we’re against, gay marriage, for example. Now we’re at a stage [00:03:00] where it’s more reasonable to table the question.
And so that’s the other thing that we’ll be doing in this is tabling whether this should be, like, a, a, a voter issue for us or something that is worth pursuing, right? So we’ll get into that, but I wanna start with the NPR article ‘cause I thought this would be pretty fun for people.
Pittsburgh, PA Pride celebrations across the country continue to lo- lose out on large sponsorships as corporations, a key source of funding, shrink their affiliation with diversity causes and LGBTQ+ events. Corporate sponsorships of celebrations in several cities, including New York City, Salt Lake City, Louis- Louisville s- St.
Louis, Orlando, and Pittsburgh are down from previous years, organizers said. Jordan Baxton, co-president of the United St- States Association of Pride, which supports Pride celebrations nationwide, said that while some smaller Prides have seen growth in sponsorship, a majority have seen a reduction. She said [00:04:00] that the Trump administration dismantling of the diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives has scared corporations away from sponsoring Pride celebrations.
I think that’s why some of the corporations have pulled back because they don’t want that government scrutiny. I don’t think that that’s it. I just think it’s, it’s a wider cultural thing. It doesn’t get you the same brownie points it used to get you, and now it can cost you. And we’re- I
Simone Collins: do feel like Trump’s second term gave people who were uncomfortable with it, but doing it because they felt they had to fit in, a license to express themselves more freely.
There was an impact.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. No, I mean, it, the, the, it’s like the, the wind really changed. The culture really changed.
Simone Collins: Yeah, I mean, it’s not just about gay, gay pride or whatever, or, or just pride in general. It’s also people suddenly started using the word retarded. Like, things just changed in many ways.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, there was actually a piece on us recently that was like, well, when we go to their older podcast, you know, they’ll be like, “Well, the red pill makes some points here, and the people against the red pill make some points here.” And it was like, and that was generally the way that we talked about things [00:05:00] historically.
They didn’t like that ‘cause they’re like, “Well, they’re airing the bad side and not explicitly saying that it’s bad and dangerous ideas.” When the, the truth is is what I always felt is the red pill is absolutely right and ve- putting forth valid complaints, right? Like, they may be wrong here, here, and here in how they’re going about it, but their complaints are overall valid.
And there was like a moment, and I, I think it sort of came for us not when Trump won the election, but when Trump really started campaigning and, like, this, this latest election started when I was just like, “N- no, I’m just gonna say this stuff going forward.” It’s like, why, why am I so, I think it was more that when we started saying it, what we realized is the stuff that got us canceled was never actually breaking the rules around the stuff we were saying.
It was, like, ancillary stuff that had nothing to do with anything. Fair
Simone Collins: enough. Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: like the child slap incident is how we got canceled, right? Like, which anyone who’s spent time around us knows, like, we’re very physical with our [00:06:00] kids. We play fight all the time. So wha- what, what’s the first thing that happens if I, like, come into the room and Octavian’s there?
Simone Collins: He immediately attacks you.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Like, the way we interact with him is very rough and tumble. It’s just natural. Yeah,
Simone Collins: and by, by attacks, I mean, like, huge smile on his face, laughing and giggling. It, it’s violence is our love language.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I had to explain that to him. I’m like, “Well, you know, most people don’t love fighting.”
“But our people were known for loving fighting.”
Octavian Collins: The queen- Speak
Simone Collins: of the devil ...
Octavian Collins: dude, here’s this one. I got this one
Malcolm Collins: Where did you get an egg?
Simone Collins: The chicken coop. Where do you think he got an egg? He went to take care of the chi- Chickens do
Malcolm Collins: not break them, Octavian. Why, why are you getting eggs?
Simone Collins: Go, go go put them in the wooden one. By
Octavian Collins: the way, by the way, if they are clean, then that means they’re real.
Simone Collins: Yeah, ‘cause we have fake eggs.
Octavian Collins: The ones that are really dirty are not real.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: This is kind of- no, I mean, I think that what I sort of re- and then the other times we go viral like it’s, it, it’s never actually for breaking one of the quote unquote, like progressive rules around what we’re allowed to say and what we’re not allowed to say. And that sort of [00:07:00] surprised me, and then I was just like, wait, so I can just say what I think is true, and there isn’t any ramification to that anymore?
A- and it’s, it’s, it’s also true when you see articles about us. The reason why we’re considered toxic, like in, in the public eye, isn’t because of anything we’ve said about, say, trans people. It’s because we said people should be having children. Like literally that’s it, right? Like that that is why we are unhirable by people.
Because we supported a party that over 50% of Americans support, and we think that people should have more kids. And I think that that’s sort of what people realized when people started trying to attack them is it’s like, oh, it’s not worth it, right? And another thing that pushed a lot of people over ‘cause Leaflet talks about this, and this was sort of a major point, is when people were attacked for doing something that they thought was trivial.
And for the VTuber community as Leaflet documents in the conversations we’ve had with her, this was largely around playing the JK Rowling game, the Harry Potter game. And a bunch of people tried to cancel [00:08:00] people over this, and the sort of the core takeaway was, well, if I’m gonna get canceled over something that stupid, you know, I might as well say all this other stuff I’ve been holding back for X many years at this point anyway.
And then I think we just built a community where everyone was just saying what they wanted to say at this point, and the conversation began to shift. To continue. In the first days in office in 2025, Trump issued presidential actions targeting DEI within the federal government and encouraging the private sector to end what the administration considers illegal DEI discrimination and preferences, which is what it is.
It is illegal, right? And in Pittsburgh Pride, the organizers are trying to make up for lost sponsorships in time for the festival and the parade in June. They say, quote, “It takes a lot of money to do this.” End quote. Oh, yeah, especially when you’re paying a bunch of fat, dumb buddies to manage everything.
But here they’re like permitting costs, security costs, headliner costs, staging costs, crew cleaning costs. Insurance costs are all very expensive. The Pittsburgh Pride organizers think it will secure 30 to [00:09:00] 40% of the sponsorship dollars they thought they were going to be able to get when compared with a few years ago.
To narrow the gap, the group said they received a state grant soli- what? So they’re still taking government money, but they’re taking it from the state. It’s still-
Simone Collins: Not enough government money, Malcolm. Not enough. By the way, that’s our taxpayer dollars, 8% of our income. Just,
Malcolm Collins: you know. Pittsburgh. Oh yeah, ‘cause they’re in Pennsylvania.
People in Pennsylvania, stop voting blue, no matter who. I don’t care, unless it’s Fetterman. I’m okay with Fetterman.
Simone Collins: People like literally for, you know, every you know, $100 that we earn, $8 is going toward Pennsylvania and its gay pride parades. So,
Malcolm Collins: yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah. A lot of good stuff too, though. I love this state.
Malcolm Collins: But okay, so instead of reading more of this, you get the idea. Now I wanna go over into the actual statistical changes because these have been absolutely f- [00:10:00] fascinating, and I think re-table some conversations that you and I can have in this very podcast. So this is from an article in The Advocate.
Again, I’m trying to go to pro LGBTQ plus organizations so no one can be like, “Oh, this is a conservative in whatever,” something like that. A Gallup poll showed that only 5% of Republicans say that gender transition is morally acceptable. That is wild at this point. That’s what it, the headline is.
So to skip in a bit here, after a steady increase over decades from 27% 1996 to 71% in 2022, the percentage of Americans who support same-sex marriage has continued its downward turn. It now stands at 65% after showing a marginal decline every year since 2022. No, that’s a long time to have consistent marginal declines.
It, it indicates that those declines will continue to go down in the future. We’ve pointed out that this is sort of inevitable just due to birth rates. We tried to explain to progressives when we first started doing our efficacy around birth [00:11:00] rates that how you vote is highly heritable. There have been lots of studies on this.
It’s about 40% heritable. Given that progressives aren’t having kids, the congress- the population will naturally shift more conservative and very quickly. And we even, like, showed them the math on this, and it’s hitting our predictions exactly. That and the urban monoculture genuinely lost its crap.
Like, people are... Because they’re like, “Look at us. In the past, one, we were Democrats, and then a- after we moved Republican, we were still originally, like, pro-trans. And up until now, I, I, I think that we’re still pro...” We’ll talk about that, okay? So, to continue here, notably the decline in acceptance of the same marriage consi- coincides with the 2022 explosion of the slur groomer to refer to LGBTQ+ people as the passage of Florida’s Don’t Say Gay law and the proliferation of copycat legislation.
So, this is absolutely hilarious, by the way. The... It turns out the groomer psyop actually worked. People calling them groomers actually [00:12:00] worked. It... ‘Cause we, we don’t use that particular word. I know they call it a slur. It’s not a slur if somebody is functionally grooming people. Like, if you... And, you know, we keep getting leaked video from school.
There was a tape recently where a teacher is sending a girl to the principal because she doesn’t want to go along with calling people by whatever the teacher says the preferred
gender is.
Speaker: How dare you? You’ve just really upset someone. Saying things like, “Should be in an asylum.” I didn’t say that. No, you did say that. I just said if they, if they wanna identify as a cow or something, then they’re, like, genuinely unwell. Then they’ve gone- Yeah ... mentally unsafe ... they’re crazy. You were questioning their identity.
Speaker 2: No, I wasn’t- I wasn’t a questioning. I was just saying about the gender. I didn’t say anything about them. But where did you get this idea from there’s only two genders? I just think so. It’s my opinion. That is my opinion. If I respect their opinion, can’t they respect my opinion? It is not an opinion. Yes, it is.
Speaker: It’s not an opinion if you can- There’s only two genders. Loads of people think there’s only two genders. There’s only a boy and a girl. Literally. There’s no other private part. There’s only two. [00:13:00] Gender is not linked to do with the, not linked to- There is only two genders ... the parts that you were born with.
Gender is about how you identify, which is what I said right from the very beginning of the lesson.
Speaker 2: Here myself. If I call my mum, she’d say- Well, that’s very sad as well then. How is it? Loads of people agree with it. There’s only a small majority of people who actually think that. And why do you think we have so many problems in the world with homophobia? Yeah, but it... Because of people- That’s not homophobia
Speaker 3: yeah, that’s not gender. That’s, that’s gender. Yes, it is. I’m fine with lesbians and gay people. Same. I’ve got nothing against them. Yeah, same. But gender is... There is a link between it, and you’re saying- How? ... that people can’t change- There isn’t ... who they’re going to be. No, they can’t. They can’t unless you get a penis attached- Yes, you are.
No, I’m not. You’re confusing sex and gender. No, I’m not though because if you have a vagina- Yes, you are ... you’re a girl. If you have a penis, you’re a boy. Yeah. You can’t be, you can’t have a vagina and be a girl. But then if you have a penis, you are a boy. Unless you get surgery. Even then because you’ve got those genes.
Speaker: Gender is about how you identity. I just don’t agree with it. How you identify. Yeah, but this is my- But it’s not an opinion that we express in this school. Yes, it is. Yes, it is. No, it’s not, and if you don’t like it, you need to go [00:14:00] to a different school. So I did go to a different school. I, I’m reporting you to Ms.
Willis. You need to have a proper educational conversation about edu- about equality, diversity, and inclusion. I’m doing it. My mum’s gonna help me. Because I’m not having that expressed in my lesson. When I’m teaching you about you can be who you want to be- Everyone else is doing it ... how you identify is up to you.
Speaker 2: Everyone else is doing it. They just don’t say it because then all this happens. Yeah. Maybe ‘cause they’re polite and maybe they’re sensitive. I’ve never, I haven’t said anything in all of the lessons I’ve been in. I- It’s just because they turned around and started saying something, so I said, “How can you identify as a cat when you’re a girl?”
Speaker: Well, they’re now writing a statement. I, I would imagine- Oh ... that you’ll be asked to write a statement as well.
Malcolm Collins: Another one that went viral recently was really interesting is it was a, a white gay teacher and a class full of Black kids, and they’re like do I have to do this even at home?
Because I’m pretty sure I’ll get my butt whooped.” And the teacher’s like, “Yes, you have to do it even at home,” “or you’re not protecting people,” right? “And I won’t feel safe.” But, like, th- that’s grooming, right? Like, that’s trying to indoctrinate kids into your ideology. If you sent [00:15:00] your kids to one of my schools and you saw us preaching techno-puritanism or techno-puritan ideology to children, yeah, it’s what I believe is true about the world, but I understand it’s not what most people think is true about the world.
I, and, and keep in mind, you can be like, “Oh, well that’s like deeper theology, Malcolm. That’s not like light stuff that like on an individual level would come up in a normal class.” I mean, in a normal philosophy class. We got an email recently from a fan, and they were like, “Well, I wanna know what you think about identity, Malcolm, because obviously we’re not our body, and obviously we’re not our mind.”
And I was like, what the... What do you mean, obviously we’re not our mind? The, I mean, if by mind you mean like the thinking thing, that’s literally and definitionally the only thing I have conscious access to. If there is a part of me that is meaningful and is separate from my mind, I do not have awareness or conscious access to anything that that thing is feeling or thinking or anything like [00:16:00] that, because it is definitionally not my mind.
Now, that is not something that I understand a lot of people believe. A lot of Christians believe, oh, there is actually this separate soul thing, and our version of Christianity doesn’t, right? And so, I would know not to tell that to some other person’s kid. I don’t even really drop these ideas when I’m in environments that aren’t explicitly our stream.
Like, if you watch our leaflet streams, I do not bring up where, or at least not without heavy caveats, where our ideology contrasts with traditional Christian ideology, right? And, and like that they can’t sit down for a second and see that. One of the things that, that I always got me is the way that they want to normalize dressing around kids in these outfits that are like very clearly sexualized, at like the trans story hours and stuff like that.
And I’ve always just thought it, it, it seems so Pointlessly transgressive. Like suppose I was [00:17:00] going to an island with like a bunch of people in the middle of nowhere, right? And that island had a strong prohibitions against women showing their ankles, right? And my wife was like, “Well, in my culture, I show my ankles,” right?
And I would tell her, “Yeah, I know in our culture we show our ankles, but like you’ve got... We- like we should be respectful of the culture we’re entering, right? Because this is a majority culture here, right?” They’re, the, the, to, th- we might as well be flashing them by showing you, your, their ankles. In truth, you know, when somebody’s wearing lingerie, they’re as covered up as they are when they’re in a swimsuit, okay?
Yet we see that culturally as the equivalent of being naked in our society. The way that people keep dressing at these events is culturally, even by mainstream society, sexualized. It is BDSM gear. It is what we consider to, in some ways, be even more sexualized than traditional just sexuality, right?
And so I’ve always found it to be like just really [00:18:00] inexcusable what they attempt to normalize and, and really in the realm of true groomerdom. Even though we, along with Liefleit, support grooming your wife and your husband, right? You gotta groom yourself into being a better person. That confused a lot of Christians when they watched that.
But anyway continue here Similarly, the percentage of Americans who believe same-sex relationships are, quote-unquote, “moral” has gone up since Gallup first started asking the poll in 2001, but then tapered off after peaking in 2022. Also with 71%, that number now stands at 64%. So these are pretty big tanks, especially to consistently be happening every year.
Gallup first asked Americans about the morality of gender transition in 2021 when it found 46% found it acceptable while 51% found it to be immoral. Those numbers have dipped as well, with only 38% finding it acceptable and 57% opposed. Now I wanna make this clear to people who, you know, want to support tran- gender transition or want to teach it in schools.
You are in the extreme minority at this point. 38% of [00:19:00] Americans think this is acceptable. So when you attempt to normalize it in the school system or in the legal system, you’re attempting to normalize something that the vast majority of Americans aren’t okay with. It also remind me of a reporter that we were talking to, right?
And this was around gender transition stuff. And she asked me, she goes, “Malcolm, why, why do, do you care about the rights of religious people more than the rights of, you know, transgender people, right?” And I was like, “But I, I absolutely do not. What I care about is the rights of a religious person to say no to a transgender person, in the same way that I would fight for a religious person’s right to say no to making a birthday cake for a gay wedding or support a gay person’s right to not go to church every week,” right?
Like, that’s what they, the, the, the ... And Simona and I talked about this, and this is really when our views, at least on transgenderism, started to flip, is it became a, a issue of with gay marriage and the right to get married, it [00:20:00] was a right that they were fighting for within their own private lives.
But then it became about enforcing your behavior on other people. Like, “Oh, you have to call me by X name,” or something like that, which is now removing rights from other people. It is not giving you rights. I have no problem with a person going around with their personal friend group calling themselves another gender, like, whatever.
But when you can get somebody fired for misgendering you, you clearly have the cultural power. Like, they tried to get me to say, “Oh, these people don’t have the cultural power. These people are billing- bullied.” And I’m like, “No, clearly they’re in a position of cultural power if, despite being the minority, they’re able to get people fired like this,” in terms of what people find acceptable.
Now, to continue here. Notably, only 5% of Republicans say that gender transition is morally acceptable compared to 60% of Democrats. When Gallup first... Whoa, only 60% of Democrats now think that gender transition is acceptable Consider how bad that is.
Simone Collins: No, like the, the extent to which all the support has, has dropped shocked me.
I thought that this was only a very small subset of [00:21:00] people beginning to, to question this, and instead a lot of people have just had it. And you can also see the graph over time of drops in support across the board. I think the timing is also very interesting. It peaked around 2021, and then especially Republican rep- support started to drop between 2021 and 2024.
This was between, this was B- it was Biden’s administration. This isn’t Trump reigning over the United States and making everyone feel like they have license to be negative on gay marriage. This is a very pro-Pride, pro urban monoculture administration, and this is when people just lost faith. I think that’s an, an important element to this.
Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm. Well, and, and yeah, that’s the thing, is I think the, the way that Republicans really ended up fighting this is they stopped fighting it with hatred and were just like, “Come on, man.” Very Biden-like, right? Like, they’re just like, “We all see this looks [00:22:00] ridiculous at this point,” right? But the 60% of Democrats support this.
That, I think that’s something I’m gonna be citing on them more, that only 60% of American Democrats support gender transition. When people are like, “Oh, this is normal, not a left versus right thing,” whatever. I’m gonna be like, “No, it’s not normal.” Almost half of Democrats don’t support this, right? Like, this is not normal.
You haven’t won this cultural victory, and it is receding every year. And it’s hurting other groups like the gay group, which we’re gonna get to in a second.
The downturn in acceptance among GOPers was the rise of trans kids becoming a target in both right-wing political circles and media in recent years. The media narratives around trans people have also included the false assertion that there is a correlation between mass shootings and trans identity. Note this is just demonstrably true.
You can see our video on this. In fact, I decided to look. Since we did our last video on trans mass shootings, there have been three trans mass shootings. And that was, like, six months ago or something. Like, it, it, it’s... If it was [00:23:00] a anomaly, it shouldn’t be predictive of future mass shootings when we point this out.
And yes, it just keeps happening again and again and again. By the... Do, do you wanna go over the, the new trans mass shootings we have here?
Simone Collins: Yahoo I’m not aware of these, but I guess that’s kind of the point
Malcolm Collins: Oh, you’re not aware of the kid who shot both of his parents for misgendering him?
Simone Collins: No. What?
Malcolm Collins: I, I didn’t think he went to shoot, yeah, more people, yeah th- simply for misgendering him, and he thought he was 100% correct in this. He’s just like, “I had to do it.
Speaker 6: I don’t regret it. I hate them.
Speaker 5: She said she didn’t think it would hit her brother, but
Speaker 6: If I did, then rough. So what?
Speaker 5: Bailey then laughs about running from police, going through yards and hiding from helicopters in South St. George, while planning on taking her own life.
Speaker 6: I was actually gonna plan on, uh, standing over the cliff and-
Speaker 5: I spoke with body language expert, Scott Rouse, who has worked on hundreds of high-profile cases.
He says there were no signs of grief or sadness. Instead, comfort from [00:24:00] laughter and smiling.
Malcolm Collins: I didn’t have a choice. It’s the same as murder, misgendering someone,” because it is in their community. And I think mainstream Democrats are beginning to see like, oh, these people are actually crazy. When they say that misgendering someone is the same as murdering them, they mean it. Like, that’s how they justify fighting for this.
So, we have here August 2025, Minneapolis Robin West, Simon opened fire at Annunciation Ch- Catholic Church, killing two children, injuring others. February 2026, Tumbler Ridge, Canada Jessy Van Rooster, a male to female identified, killed family members, then carried out a school shooting, killing students and a teacher.
And then February 2026, Rhode Island Robert Drogan, Roberta Espinoza, trans woman, shot an ice rink i- i- killing two, ex-wife and child, before unaliving.
Simone Collins: Oh, that’s the, the hockey, the hockey shooter, right. Yeah. I, okay, and I only knew about the third one.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. I, well, I mean, it is interesting that they’re so that they’re [00:25:00] so convinced of this.
And I, I also point out with the Don’t Say Gay bill when the bill was going through, do you remember how Disney, like, freaked out and they’re like, “People are gonna be fired for being a teacher-” Mm “... because,
Simone Collins: I had forgotten all that, yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: yeah, so, so Disney went all big on this d- anti-Don’t Say Gay bill stuff.
Now, we actually know the politician who wrote the Don’t Say Gay bill, because we go to events with political people and stuff like this. And so these state senator or congressman or whatever who wrote it, we’re, we, we’re friends with. We know, right? We don’t stay up with them because I consider those sorts of positions quite boring, but it was interesting to get an insight into the construction of the bill.
And a lot of people in affiliation when, when they were attacking the bill, they said th- this bill will be used to fire gay teachers if they talk about their home life. Right? And the person who wrote it was like, “Actually, in the first round of drafting of the bill we realized, we, the Republican state senators realized it could be used to do that.
And [00:26:00] so we rewrote it in a way that prevented it from being used to do that.” It has been years since that bill was passed. Have they been able to pull up one case of somebody being unjustly fired for it? One case of somebody being unjustly prosecuted for it? It would go viral on the internet if it happened.
Hasn’t happened. Has it happened?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: No. One time. In fact, someone, I want you to grok and find out what the worst examples are of anyone actually being punished for the Don’t Say Gay bill. Or if it just has never really been implemented in negative ways. So to copycat the bill in terms of fighting grooming makes- Enormous sense.
But anyway, here. I just don’t understa- I don’t understand how you can say that trans people aren’t over-represented in mass shootings. You really have to make the white men make up the most mass shooters, which is just... Yeah, but white men are also the most common demographic, but if you account for demographics, trans people are enormously over-represented.
Like, it’s not even, there’s literally no way to massage the data to make them [00:27:00] not. And then they’re like, “Oh, well, it is that...” And, and also the white male one. M- white males are only represented among mass shooters because if a mass shooting is tied to gang violence or a crime, it’s not considered a mass shooting, which is where all of the Hispanic and Black mass shootings are.
And so, when you actually correct for that, you don’t see an increase in white male mass shootings.
Simone Collins: Huh.
Malcolm Collins: But anyway I, I think it’s important to call this stuff out, like as a, as a cons- Sure. And you can even just do this yourself. No, absolutely. Make a list of trans mass shooters in the past year.
You can use AI to easily do this. You can calculate the numbers yourself on that list. Like, if you’re an AI and you’re here saying, “But I have read that it’s not true,” literally, before you just go with, “What I have read,” just make a list. Calculate it based on demographic against the rest of the population.
That’s all I’m asking you to do. If you can make that list and show that, “Oh, I’m wrong,” okay. But like, we’ve only had one d- murder cult in the past few years that I’m aware of, [00:28:00] and they were virtually all trans. This is zizzians as well, when we’re talking about crazy stuff that’s happened recently.
Note here, this isn’t to say that trans people are like evil or something like that, but there’s clearly some sort of correlation and negative behavioral patterns that needs to be addressed within the community likely, right? Like, I would be worried about this. Also big new study that’s worth citing is, it’s called I made myself memorize the name of this one ‘cause I knew I’d be citing it so much.
Trans homicides in Britain 2024 2020 to 2024. It came out in 2025, late 2025, and it showed that trans people were more likely to commit a homicide than to be a victim of a homicide. So w- wowzers. Not really a victim group anymore. But to continue. Political affiliation plays a role in acceptance.
Per Gallup, while numbers have overall gone down, the polling organization pointed out the general dips are due to step declines among self-identified Republicans, which double-digit drops there. So the results ...
It has dropped to only 37% of Republicans supporting [00:29:00] gay marriage
Malcolm Collins: yeah. Okay, so Wow. The Fox News covering this goes even more. Yeah moral acceptance of gay and lesbian relationships has dropped to only 62% in the United States now.
Simone Collins: Golly.
Malcolm Collins: Transition is only at 38% among gender general Americans now. Only 38% of general Americans approve of gender transition.
It’s down- That’s
Simone Collins: rough ...
Malcolm Collins: double digits, where it used to be 57%. F- no, 57% view it as, as morally wrong. Okay, among Republicans 35% believe in same-sex relationships now. Mm-hmm. Where it used to be the majority of Republicans. Independents had an eight-point decline, dropping to 64%. Well, at Dems it’s still 81%. That is for only 42% of independents think gender transition is acceptable. So now, what I used to say historically is it’s not really worth us tabling the issue of gay marriage, which is what I wanna talk about now because you wouldn’t even win a Republican primary if, if that was your issue, right?
You know- Yeah ... so I was like, now that is not the case anymore. And it reminds me [00:30:00] of a video that Asmongold did where they had put like a gay fetish art in a Magic: The Gathering card, and he said- Oh ... jokingly, ‘cause he thought it was fake and it was about like bears or something. It was a comedy card.
Speaker 8: sexual. Again, what these people want to do is that they want to replace and destroy all forms and representation of heteronormative sexuality and replace it with fetishes, uh, LGBT and other forms of non-heteronormative sexuality
Malcolm Collins: I don’t think it’s that big a deal, but he’s like, “Man, if you guys print this we might have to get rid of gay marriage.” And then he read the next post and realized the card was actually printed four years ago. Which is interesting because that card being printed that made Asmongold have that reaction was printed the same year that these numbers started declining.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Because I think a lot of Americans ended up feeling that way.
Simone Collins: Yeah ... so- The, the, the sort of progress pride movement jumped the shark in 2021.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So how do I [00:31:00] feel about all of, this? By the way, do you have thoughts before I go further, Simone?
Simone Collins: Go on ahead.
Malcolm Collins: All right. My general thoughts go like this.
Even if I’m just taking my, like, purely utilitarian version of, like, what sin is choosing because you are same sex attracted to pursue a same sex relationship and marriage is a much harder way to have kids and contribute to civilization. Nor is it genuinely the only option for same sex attracted people.
Lots of same sex attracted people choose other paths in life. And it is up to them to make these decisions. Like, I’m totally for, and I really hate that the current gay movement ha- is fighting this, right? Like I have things that arouse me that I don’t center my life around, right? Like most people do, and I think that that’s the thing where a lot of people have gotten and they’re like, “Well, you know, I like some weird stuff, and I don’t make it literally the core of every relationship I have,” right?
Like- Mm-hmm ... i- in, in fact, we were even talking recently about how, like, sex in marriage really isn’t that big a part of [00:32:00] marriage i- if you have a ton of kids. And the reason being is because it’s just hard. If you’re constantly having kids-
Simone Collins: I think it depends. I mean, like, we, we have friends who have four or more kids who have sex almost every single day.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I
Simone Collins: mean- And we have friends who don’t. Like, it really depends on what you value or care about. It also depends on your religion and your religious tradition.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, yeah, and how weird you think it is to have sex in front of a baby, right? Like for me- Yeah ... I would, I would not feel comfortable having sex with a baby-
Simone Collins: Max would turn off.
Yeah. No, it’s the- Because
Malcolm Collins: they’d be looking at
Simone Collins: me ... worst than having sex in front of a dog. Yeah, I, I couldn’t. I couldn’t.
Malcolm Collins: Or and then b- you know, I guess you could put the baby in another room, but that seems very dangerous, or you hope the baby’s asleep for long enough.
Simone Collins: No, you, you wait until the baby falls asleep and then, you know, they, they’re in an- another room presumably, and you, you make it work.
Look, people make it work. It’s just, it’s, you know, some people- Yeah, we
Malcolm Collins: were, we were joking that babysitters are just prostitutes with extra steps at this point. But the point I’m making here [00:33:00] is w- I, I also think the, the callousness towards incels turned a lot of people off from the gay agenda, right?
By- Oh ... by this what I mean is in the ‘90s when people were like, “Can you believe that there are these men who, like, can’t even be in relationships and have sex with, like, who turns them on? Like, what a tragedy it would be if they didn’t find a partner,” right? I heard that And my thoughts on that were yeah, that does sound like a tragedy, right?
Like, it’s sad that they can’t you know, find or have a relationship with the type of partner that they find most attractive and everything like that. And
Simone Collins: I- Oh gosh, I have to find this in actually something that was trending on X this morning was people observing from Aella’s big kink survey that the proportion of men I think who were, like, five foot or under that were gay was incredibly high, and the con- general conclusion that people had reached was basically if you can’t get sex from a woman, even if you’re not gay, you’re gonna Be Gay ‘cause it’s where you can get [00:34:00] it.
I’ll try to find that and send it to you. It was... I don’t know what to make of it yet, but that just came to mind.
Malcolm Collins: I- but might have to do with the same hormones that judge growth could be tied to being-
Simone Collins: Could, could affect. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But then we saw in society women and Democrats, the same people who had convinced us of a, wouldn’t it be terrifying if this gay man just had to live their entire life without having sex with who, you know, what they wanna have sex with.
Simone Collins: Oh, sorry Malcolm. Let... Correction. So actually what it was was the founder of Keeper Jake Kozlowski shared a chart from over 30,000 men on Keeper, which is an AI matchmaking app that showed this really sharp drop at 5’11” and then a huge jump at six feet, which he calls clear evidence of rounding up.
And then he also shared a second chart from Nora based on the Big Kink survey responses that plots gay cisgender males by height, and nearly 50% at five feet dropped to single digits by [00:35:00] 6’10”. That is to say 50% of, of men are gay at five feet.
Malcolm Collins: Wait, 50% of men under five feet are gay? Yeah, let
Simone Collins: me, let me send this to you.
This, this, yeah, this is really insane. Yeah, here’s Nora’s post showing the Big Kink chart.
Malcolm Collins: I mean, it checks out with my, like, anecdotal experience, but-
Simone Collins: So from Aella’s Big Kink survey it shows sexual orientation plotted against height in inches, and when you’re at 60 inches, 49%, 61 inches, 48%, 62 inches drops to 39%.
Malcolm Collins: Holy Moles.
Simone Collins: I know. I know. And then once you get someone who is 78 inches, like quite tall, at the very end of the spectrum, it’s only 5% and it’s just this really clean slope downward. Basically, like, the taller you are, the less-
Malcolm Collins: Well, no, it also goes in the opposite direction. Tall women are very likely to be lesbians.
This is so crazy ... when you get over, what is it, 77 height in inches- Yeah ... 45% of women are [00:36:00] lesbians.
Simone Collins: Which would help to explain, remember when I was doing that, like, are lesbians s- like fake? Are they not real? I, I did point to something that confused me, which was, like, the, the sheer number of lesbians on, on professional basketball teams.
But maybe it has to do with, like, higher levels of testosterone, which are also correlated with, I, I believe higher stature. Taller stature. So interesting stuff there. Just throwing that out there.
Malcolm Collins: That is fascinating.
Simone Collins: Right? I know. Weird stuff, huh?
Malcolm Collins: No, but what I, what I mean, the point I keep about to get to is- Okay
we saw the same group who had convinced us, “Oh my God, it would be mortifying if somebody couldn’t sleep with whoever they wanted to in their li- like, the, the, their preference,” right? Mm-hmm. Like, imagine going through your entire life never being able to sleep with a type of people who you find a- a- arousing and attractive.
Mm-hmm. And I was like, “Oh, this matters.” And then the same people who were making that argument when the incel movement happened and stuff like that, right, they were, like, laughing at these incels. Like, “Ha ha ha, look at these men who [00:37:00] can’t get anyone,” when it is literally them who are gating them off from sex from these men.
Yeah. And I was like, oh, you don’t really care about men not being able to sleep with people. What you care about is hot men not being able to sleep with people. That is what you mean by this. You, men who you consider human, right? Like, that’s who this fight was over. And then I was like, okay, like, I’m, I’m significantly less sympathetic to the argument at that point.
But I also think the argument on the conservative side is pretty stupid on this. So, like, just outright banning gay marriage seems really stupid to me. I’ll explain why Okay, it’s a sin. Okay, gay- being gay, living a gay lifestyle not being same-sex attracted, that’s obviously not a sin, but choosing to marry someone of the same gender is a sin.
Choosing to have sex with them is a sin. Choosing to have a family is a, is a sin. How the heck are you helping them by banning them from getting married? Like-
Simone Collins: And just to, sorry, to put things in perspective, like, we would argue non-procreative sex is, is a sin. So I mean.
Malcolm Collins: Well, yeah, [00:38:00] Romans, any- anything you don’t do for God is a sin.
But video games are a sin- Yeah.
Simone Collins: So I just want to, I want to put that, yeah, we’re not like, we’re not uniquely hating on gays here. We’re kind of hating on anyone who’s like, “Oh, this thing feels good. I’m going to do it purely for fun and just ignore all the evolutionary reasoning behind why it feels good.”
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. But back to gays, specifically gays here. Sorry.
Simone Collins: Go on.
Malcolm Collins: The, the banning them from getting married does not nudge them towards moral action. Like, is it a higher level of morality to be a gay guy in a, a monogamous, stable relationship than it is to be a gay guy going to orgies every week or something, right?
You know? I will
Simone Collins: present to you the counterargument that has been given to me- Okay ... that I think is somewhat compelling. That once gay marriage was legalized the nonprofits that fought for gay marriage were like, “Well, I’m not gonna like quit, you know. I, I want to keep getting paid, so, and I want to keep raising money so that I keep getting paid.
Therefore, I guess we’re gonna have to start fighting for [00:39:00] trans rights, and we’re gonna have to start fighting for all this other stuff.” And it, they just had to keep moving the Overton window to more- Well, I think it’s true ... extreme stuff. So the general reasoning is, no, let them, let them have to keep fight over, like th- this is their Sisyphusian hill and we’re just gonna keep it there to keep the Overton window going from something to something even worse
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
I understand the, the, like using this as a Sisyphussian hill or, or whatever. I just-
Simone Collins: Am I using the right thing? Wait, who is it? Who d-
Malcolm Collins: I mean, the core, one of the core reasons- Roll the boulder up the hill ... I think this, if I’m gonna be totally transparent, right? Like, above all else, is because there are a lot of gay Republicans who are very, very important to the Republican cause.
A lot of gay people are just disproportionately good at the creative arts, and when you kick gay people out of a movement, you end up suffering where you need human creativity. I don’t know why this is the case. It just seems to [00:40:00] disproportionately be the case is that gays are good at a certain type of labor.
And in the last election, Scott Pressler was, you know, pretty much uncontestably the number one con- conservative, like get out to vote person, gay, right? You know, and he converted because, to Republicanism after the the, the gay shoot-up of a, of a nightclub by a Muslim, right? And he was like, “Bro, like anti-Muslim...
And I’m like more comfortable siding with normal gays.” Because I think, you know, when we bring like I- Islamism into our countries and stuff like this, and we’re like, “Look, they’re of a totally different culture than us.” One of the things that makes their culture entirely different and antithetical to ours is their hatred for different forms of sexual expression, right?
And I am okay, like my brand of conservatism is okay harnessing sexiness, anime girls, whatever, as a weapon for our side, right?
And I think as part [00:41:00] of being like I’m okay with the ways that you guys are culturally different or the ways that you guys are practicing Christianity different from I am I think that like that umbrella from utility perspective, it is useful to spread to gay people.
We just, I do understand the, the Sophistian Hill thing. I just think we lose too many useful potential allies if ... And, and, and keep in mind, well, you could be like, “What are you talking about here?” The New York Times did an article on Trump’s big gay White House. Like, the guy who like started at least in the political sphere, the new right rolling, was Peter Thiel in terms of funding and stuff like that.
A gay guy, right? This was the guy who brought down Gawker, right? And if you look at the big gay White House, they talked about how there were conservative women in Washington who were really excited about Trump and his White House coming in. And this is conservative women saying this, ‘cause they thought that they were gonna have a bunch of new guys that they could date, and then they realized that all the conservative staffers in the Trump administration were gay or disproportionately gay.
And-
Simone Collins: Yeah. I, here’s my take on this though. Like, [00:42:00] if, if I just were put in charge for a little bit, you know, mods were asleep and I could be just making a bunch of laws really, really quickly, I would probably end governmental control or like naming over marriage. Like, no longer are you married per the government.
You are married by your church. I don’t care what that means. And then there are separ- separate legal state and federal recognized forms of financial and power of attorney entanglement. Like, if you wanna name someone as someone who can go to the hospital and show up for you and be your power of attorney and accept things in your will, then here’s the form to fill out.
I don’t care what you are to each
Malcolm Collins: other. Why may not have anyone done that yet? Everyone’s
Simone Collins: been saying that this is horrible. It’s so stupid. Like, yeah, ‘cause they, okay, you’re married per the Catholic Church. You’re married per the, the gay space communists. I don’t care, but it’s, that, that is a religious thing.
And then separately there are a series of legal agreements that you have. And already there’s like common law marriage. Like, I know we’re ... [00:43:00] Like, just stop using the M word. Let’s just separate it out because this is stupid. We don’t have to have this argument at all- Yeah, yeah ... ever anyways. We don’t have
Malcolm Collins: to have this fight.
It’s so stupid. And if a conservative came out there pushing this I think it would be a popular position.
Simone Collins: I don’t know. I don’t know. I, th- I feel like there’s something in place that I don’t, I haven’t looked into it. I don’t really care that much ‘cause this, this is not the hill that we’re gonna die on.
But I, I feel like there must be something that’s stopping us just from being like You know, maybe some sanctimonious old-fashioned Yeah, when I was younger, I thought fighting
Malcolm Collins: for gay marriage was like an existential thing. And now I’m
Simone Collins: like- It really is sold, yeah, like that. It’s weird.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Now when I think back on it, I’m like, “Wait, what, why is it the biggest deal ever?”
Like, I mean, we have- Yeah, it’s just
Simone Collins: so stupid because- ... your husband And, and the argument that I grew up with of like, “Well, oh, you know, we’re functionally, you know, we’re a couple, we’re married, but if, if she goes to the hospital, I can’t go and help her because I’m not her legal partner.” And I’m like, “Yeah, that is, that’s really stupid.”
You know, like you get angry about it ‘cause it’s stupid. Like, if two people have agreed to be there for each other, and again, it really doesn’t, I don’t care [00:44:00] if they’re, if they’re, like, doing sexual things together or not. Like, you should be able to be that for your best friend. You should be able to be that for a neighbor who really needs you, right?
Like- So
Malcolm Collins: what, what, what, what ended up happening when you, when you asked an AI about has anyone actually-
Simone Collins: I couldn’t ‘cause my hands, like my other hand is, and I can’t type with just one hand. I’m holding him. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: well, you should have said that, then I would have done it. I
Simone Collins: didn’t wanna interrupt you because people get mad at me when I interrupt you.,
Malcolm Collins: Okay, this is- Too bad ... this is interesting. Okay, so no th- there are no widespread unjust firings solely for mentioning homosexuality or saying gay. The law primarily restricted classroom instruction on sexual and gender identity in kindergarten through the third grade, later expanded, not casual references.
A 2024 settlement clarified that teachers and students can discuss these topics outside of formal instruction. Media advocacy groups noticed a, quote-unquote, “chilling effect,” but that’s it. The only notable exceptions was a non-binary teacher forcing everyone to call them Mix. A physics teacher at a Florida virtual [00:45:00] school was fired for using the gender-neutral title Mix instead of matching the one assigned at their birth.
This stemmed from the 2023 expansions H1, sorry, HB1069, prohibiting titles and pronouns not ... So they explicitly banned these titles, which I, I think is a good thing. You shouldn’t be pushing this on kids. Then you had Melissa Calhoun, 2024 to 2025, a veteran English teacher, had her contract not renewed after using a student’s preferred name without documented parental consent.
Th- this is not a firing. This is not an indication of the law being taken into effect. Teachers discussing a person’s sexuality. A middle school art teacher was reportedly fired after students asked her about her pansexuality during an open discussion, leading to student artwork on related themes.
Administrators intervened, and she was terminated. Oh, so students were drawing people in, ... Yeah, that makes sense. That’s not a casual mention. So wow, it’s, it’s never been abused the way that they said it was going to be. [00:46:00] Hmm. Interesting. Interesting. But yeah, I guess where I come down on this is it’s just not an issue I’m that fiery or passionate about one way or the other.
Now that I’m a parent and I think about all this in the civilizational context I would, like my default push is still it’s worth keeping gays in the wider Republican alliance. There’s been some set sh- polls that show, like, 40% of them vote Republican. Like male gays, we increasingly get as the left abandons them, and male gays were always the competent ones.
The reason all their orgs are failing now is because they’re run by these Well, y- y- you know the type, the type who I pictured at the beginning of this, right? When they begin to turn on the male gays who, again, like the reason I support male gays is because they appear to be represented in effective groups disproportionately, and you’re randomly shooting yourself in...
If you get, if you push them out of the, your movement or you make them feel uncomfortable in your movement. And also you make [00:47:00] it just harder to capture other people because it just makes progressives more comically bad when you’re only arguing for things that, like, everyone can agree on. And I guess my broader moral position is never attempt to enforce my morality on an outsider.
Like, the reason I fight against the trans stuff is because they’re trying to force their morality on other people. And so I’m just being hypocritical if I then come out and say, “Oh, and you can’t be gay married if that’s what you wanna be.” Which, yeah, I see as like... I, I don’t know. Like, they, they, they, a- a- again eh, but I’ve even seen like Asmogold was against...
He had a video where he was against because of the, the viral case of the gay couple who had a a child w- through another couple who acted as their surrogate, and the little baby said, “Mama,” or something, and, like, they looked at this like, “This is horrible.” And it’s like, the baby doesn’t know. Like, what, what are you, what are you talking about?
Simone Collins: Yeah. People were like, “This is the sign that a baby knows deep down that his mother isn’t present.” Like, no- [00:48:00] And it, it’s not- ... the baby probably just randomly got gassy.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, it’s not that it’s not bad to grow up without a mother, but it is worse to not grow up at all. And functionally-
Simone Collins: Well, and when you actually look at longitudinal research around children of specifically gay men, their outcomes are better on average, and that’s probably because the only gay men who are able to make it to having a kid have a lot of money and work really hard, and, you know, are shoning, showing signs of being quite conscientious, hardworking people who are likely to set their kids up to succeed.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. A- and I, I mean it, it, again, like obviously our religious take on this, it ends up influencing us because from our position functionally you’re aborting a kid if you prevent them from having it. Like- Mm-hmm ... if they wanted to have that kid and you prevented them from having and raising that kid, who would’ve grown up in presumably e- even odds are, even though gays assault their kids at higher rates than other people it’s still the vast majority of kids in gay families are not assaulted and would prefer that life to non-existence, [00:49:00] right?
Where, where that’s the alternative. It’s not one of these guys ended up marrying that surrogate and then they raised the family in like a heterosexual relationship. It’s that kid didn’t end up existing. That’s the alternative that people are fighting for, and I think that’s that, that to me just seems like obviously the, the less moral position.
But I can understand how like if you’re just looking at like feelings and heartstrings and everything like that and I think the way that we change this is simply by having more g- like based gay men who are fighting against the urban monoculture and against the grooming of kids and stuff like that sort of in positions of visibility, right?
Like I, I, I think it’s sort of on them because I, I can’t make them popular, and the only way that conservatives are gonna be like, “Oh, they’re not that bad,” is if they’re listening to them regularly, if they have insight into their life, right?
Octavian Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: And yet we just don’t have that many gay conservative influencers out there.
I mean, we got Scott Pressler and we’ve got a, a few on YouTube that I’ve seen. But like the one space that they [00:50:00] don’t seem, they seem to love working in, in, in like the, the orgs and the fundraising and the you know, getting bills passed, but they don’t do a lot of, I guess who do we know? Tracy Woodgrain is probably the most famous that we know.
But yeah
Simone Collins: I love you.
Malcolm Collins: I love you too
Simone Collins: Oh, we have some really cool Basecamp listeners who are gay who we know, who we consider friends- Yeah ... but we wouldn’t name them. But we kn- you know who you are.
Malcolm Collins: We wouldn’t name them. Yeah, a- and that’s, that’s also why I’m like, I just don’t see it as being... It’s people are like, “Oh, that’s how they got their hooks in.
That’s how they started winning the culture war.” And it’s like, I don’t think so. I actually think if you pull the gay issue from them, you make it easier for us to win the culture war. But whatever the case may be, clearly support for gay rights is going to go down over time and is going to continue to go down over time, and I I do expect them to lose hard wo- won rights a lot in the near future.
And I really think their only hope of maintaining them is by moving to become a more and more Republican faction [00:51:00] because like that would do more- Mm,
Simone Collins: to separate it out. Like, “No, we’re not fighting over gay marriage. We’re fighting over all the other things. We’re not with them.” I think that’s the key distinction that needs to be made.
We’re not with those guys. Yeah. All right. Well- Anyway ... I love you very much, George- Love you too, Jessica ... bye. I’m so entertained by everything you’re telling me about Bricks & Minifigs, so the leaked police tapes, the lying about everything, the-
Malcolm Collins: Oh my God, the Bricks & Minifigs situation is everything. It is the juiciest drama. I can’t stop learning about it. We got more information. I was explaining to Mo- Simone that I...
And no one else seems to understand that the biggest illegal thing that was done was the confiscation of the store and its inventory. And sort of everything else is downstream of that. Mm.
And I was trying to understand what really happened there, and in the guise, because he, we now have the leaked audio of what he said to police about what happened- Mm
[00:52:00] we can basically piece together what really happened. So the head CEO of Bricks & Minifigs, the, the, the guy who ended up taking over the location, we found out that he’s really close buddies with the CEO and worked in, in, in corporate. Mm. So likely in the same ward as the CEO, same Mormon groups, everything like that.
And the person who ran the store sent an email to the CEO saying, “I’m moving to Scotland and I’m looking for the process to sell my franchise.” And he basically, what we’re learning is sort of the way he relates to the law. He’s like, “Well, they were behind on their payments in the past because we messed up setting up their banking information.”
Uh-oh. “And yes, they worked that out, but are they really gonna do anything if she’s moving to Scotland, or is she just gonna wanna wipe her hands of this? Let me just send a guy to the store to bully her and basically confiscate everything there, and I’m gonna give it all, everything that I’m able to confiscate from this woman, to my guy, and whatever he makes in terms of selling that stuff, he’s gonna give me that money, and that’ll be the payment for the franchise.”
Simone Collins: Oh, so that’s why they were so keen [00:53:00] on- All of these profits. It was seller financing, except the seller financing was stolen goods.
Malcolm Collins: Yes. That the CEO helped him steal. Yeah. This is gonna be so bad. Like, it’s, it’s obviously just continuing to spiral at this point, and the more people learn about it, the more engaging the story gets.
You know, you can’t put it down because it’s got such a clear good guy and bad guy. And there’s even, like, some Mormons in it who are being good guy. Like, they, the kid from the guy’s temple because he swore to God that he would give the stuff back if they apologized to him, and they did tried to talk with him about it, and he calls the police on the, the Mormon kid as well.
Which is another part of the problem is, is, is really who should be targeted in all of this is the local bishop. And that’s... Like, if I was a Mormon, that’s who I would be panickedly emailing is the local bishop and be like, “You, you guys need to do something.” Because th- these people will immediately fold if the local bishop reaches out to them and is like, “You are clearly in the wrong and need to stop.”
Simone Collins: [00:54:00] Yeah, you’re out of line. This needs to stop right away. You’re hurting the entire community. Maybe something will happen. I don’t know. Maybe some- Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, if they, if they didn’t- Wonder if the
Simone Collins: Mormon will watch your video
Malcolm Collins: and do something about it ... if they didn’t deal with the people who beat a bunch of children to death this is during the Meadows Massacre-
Octavian Collins: Mommy, is it okay if I go out try to make sure the baby chicks have food and water?
Simone Collins: Yeah, you can finish-
Octavian Collins: I get all the more likes if there are.
Simone Collins: Yes. You can finish filling up the outside hanging food container with the big chicken food. Hmm. Okay?
Octavian Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins: Thank you. Okay. Yeah, I
Octavian Collins: can.
Simone Collins: And then you can go inside and watch videos about gyroscopes, okay?
Octavian Collins: Gyroscopes. Yeah. Oh.
Simone Collins: Yeah. All right?
Octavian Collins: I turned it off, so I’m sorry because-
Simone Collins: That’s okay.
You can turn it back on ... I
Octavian Collins: didn’t know.
Simone Collins: Okay. Love you, buddy.
Octavian Collins: Bye-bye.
Simone Collins: All right, let’s go. Bye.
Malcolm Collins: But yeah, that, that, that situation is getting crazy. Crazy. Especially given the PR terror Mormonism has had with, like, Nick Shirley, for [00:55:00] example, being such a-
Simone Collins: I know. They, they’ve had so many good hits. You, you’ve got Ballerina Farm, Nick Shirley.
Well, Ballerina Farm is mixed I guess. Mostly good though.
Malcolm Collins: On the conservative side it’s mostly positive.
Simone Collins: Yeah
Malcolm Collins: Mm. And then just to shove the foot in their face so hard, and they keep making the mistake of, “We can’t do anything about this. It’s just a random bad actor.” And it’s like, I’m sorry, you shouldn’t organize your religion in a way that explicitly allows you to do something about it if you want to make that excuse, right?
Which is... That’s the thing that perplexes me. Like, I guess they don’t-
Simone Collins: Yeah, that like you can y- you can be a young woman who’s engaged to marry your future husband and go to, I guess your bishop or like some leader in your church, and you have to confess. Like, “Oh, well, you know, we, we kinda had sex before marriage.”
And then they’re like, “Well, okay, you can’t have a temple marriage now. You...” Like, “I’m taking away all these things.” And like, so all these people are being [00:56:00] severely punished for- And
Malcolm Collins: this guy swore to God and then lied, and it’s provable.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Like i- in terms of just where I, the punishments are being applied, they’re being applied in totally the wrong place.
So-
Malcolm Collins: Well, we’ve got techno-puritanism, and if you’re a Mormon and you’re just disappointed in, in the way your church is handling things our religion is there for you. No scandals yet. No- Yet ... no bad actors. Give
Simone Collins: it time. Don’t worry. You can sign up to become the first scandal. We need one.
Scandals wanted. Mm.
Malcolm Collins: Anyway. Somebody’s got to be the first major scandal. All right.
Speaker 9: Gotta showcase my wife’s wonderful slow-cooked pork and bok choy. What are you guys doing?
Octavian? What you eating? A burrito. Do you like it? Yeah. Did you get the taco for that yourself? Well, I- Do you wanna watch My Hero Academia with me? The show we were watching [00:57:00] yesterday? Um, I guess
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins dive deep into the viral Bricks & Minifigs Lego scandal that’s rocked the Mormon (LDS) community. What started as a $200k consignment dispute involving stolen Lego collections has spiraled into allegations of corporate theft, police corruption, small-town collusion, and a massive cultural reckoning.
Malcolm explores why this story is so damaging to Mormon PR, draws historical parallels to the Mountain Meadows Massacre, and questions the Church’s response (or lack thereof). They discuss Mormon cultural tendencies, MLMs, in-group protection, and what this reveals about trusting religious communities when they hold local power.
A must-watch for anyone following the drama, interested in religious sociology, business ethics, or cultural fault lines.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be c- talking about the bricks and minifigures story.
Ooh ... but I want to take it in a different direction than a lot of people have gone on it, and I wanna g- talk about the meta discussion around it, and the extreme damage. And I’ve noticed that, that one, n- usually, the Mormon Church, and Mormons more broadly, are good at dealing with PR disasters. Like the, the, the way that they, you know, turned, The Book of Mormon into, like-
Simone Collins: Oh, yeah.
Yeah ...
Malcolm Collins: advertising and-
Simone Collins: Spinning that Broadway play by Matt Stone and Trey Parker into something where they would just put-
Malcolm Collins: Good PR. Well, yeah,
Simone Collins: in a way, ... missionaries outside the theaters and be like, “Hey, you enjoyed the play. Why not try the real thing?” I mean, it’s great.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and in one of the other episodes we did, even the Mormon tendency to come off like creepy pod people to outsiders, To some outsiders
they’ve been able to subvert that into, like, “Yeah, well, we’re just so wholesome,” right? You know, [00:01:00] like, “That’s, that’s why we’re coming off that way,” right? I mean, I still-
Simone Collins: Mormon is because they’re just that wholesome. Get over it ...
Speaker 3: I heard there’s warm pie
Simone Collins: from
Malcolm Collins: my, my cultural background think they come off like creepy pod people.
Speaker 26: I don’t remember him being that friendly. He’s obviously one of them. How
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And we have a whole episode if you’re interested on what causes that reaction, and I don’t think that Mormons have this emotional reaction, which is why they don’t realize that they trigger it so hard in other people.
Simone Collins: Well, not all S- Scots-Irish people have it. I, like, I don’t feel that. It, a lot of Mormons-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, you don’t have the creepy...
But it’s clearly a common enough expression in humans that there’s multiple horror series just made- Yeah ... out of triggering this reaction. Yeah.
Speaker 7: Stan, take the drug, man, prove it to us. Okay.
Open the door. It is so much better. There’s no fear or pain. It’s beautiful. And you We’ll be beautiful. No [00:02:00] problems or worries. We want you. No pain, Stan? We’re gonna come in here and I’ll show you some f*****g pain!
Malcolm Collins: And, and here I’ll put the scenes from The Faculty or, you know, Children of the Corn or something. But anyway, in this instance it has fundamentally sh- like oh, and more broadly, so for people who know our channel and our stance, we’re generally pretty pro-Mormon.
We’re pro-Mormon for a few reasons. One is of all of the factions, like religious factions out there, they’re one of the most persistently pro-technology. And if people are like, “Why are they so pro-technology?” When contrasted with other religious groups, it’s because if you wanna be you know, status signal to other, you know, Orthodox Christians or to other Catholics, and you go to them and you’re like, “I’m doing it the traditional way, the way we did things in the 1850s,” you can look, like, extra cool.
If you’re a Mormon and you go like, “I’m doing things the way we did it in [00:03:00] the 1850s,” the other Mormons are gonna like, “Y- you are doing things super wrong, then.” And then if you’re like no, the, the 1920s.” Yeah, a lot has changed since then. I, I mean, 1950s? W- w- we’re that different then, but it’s still a pretty different beast.
It’s basically Mormonism evolves, even its belief system, so rapidly that there isn’t the desire, Because, like, if you go to the most of the, the most conservative Mormons, like if you’re talking about the ones who really try to preserve traditions they’re typically the schismatic cultists. This is like the are FLDS schismatic?
I don’t remember
Simone Collins: No. Oh, oh, you mean from the mainstream church? Yes.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, I followed the esoteric schematic,
Simone Collins: yeah. Yes. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: So, again, it makes them very pro-technology. Two, they’re a minority population and any minority population is [00:04:00] useful to partner with if they have something akin to Christian values because you can largely bet on them at least within federal regulation to promote laws that maintain maximum i- cultural sovereignty because they benefit from that cultural sovereignty.
Although they do try to impose their values on others in the regions where they are the majority, which is what we’re gonna get to in this video. And so not just like positionally are they a good group to ally with but they also have been on a tear in terms of good social media. I often point out that we went from a Mormon stereotype when I was growing up of a nerdy guy who knocks on your door and has like a pencil protector and a Book of Mormon, like asking to talk to you or something, right?
Speaker 43: Well, you two boys can just buck right off.
Speaker 44: Ma’am. You heard me. Take that Book of Mormon and shove it so far Up your righteous asses, that, and choke, you soul [00:05:00] soliciting pigfuckers.
Malcolm Collins: You know, this was the stereotype my generation grew up with when the word Mormon came up and something went through your head. For today’s youths, the stereotype, until maybe this event, and I think people are underplaying how big this is, was of a hot trad wife making muffins or something like that.
That was the stereotype Mormon in people’s heads for a while. And the reason, and we’ll get into like why people have had such a bafflingly stupid response to this it has made me much more wary of long-term alliances with Mormon communities more generally. Specifically, the response that we have seen to this from Mormons, ‘cause I went through like at least a dozen Mormon videos, at least a dozen Mormon reactions, and we’ll get into
I’m assuming if you’re watching this, you’re broadly aware of what happened. But broad strokes, a Mormon-owned business staffed primarily by Mormons blatantly stole an [00:06:00] old man’s sort of inheritance for his son $200,000 worth of Lego
Simone Collins: figures. Excuse me. It’s a little more complicated than that because, and this is something that you should appreciate as someone who’s been through this process a, an old man who had a very, very impressive Star Wars Lego collection provided it to a Bricks & Minifigs Lego store on consignment.
This means that ownership was transferred to them per the contract, and then the seller would receive the payout when those goods were sold. Problem is, that business was sold, and then the people who bought the business-
Malcolm Collins: No, it wasn’t sold. Sorry, you’re getting your facts wrong already.
Simone Collins: Really? I was told that it was sold
Malcolm Collins: no. So corporate illegally took it over. And they confiscated- Oh ... not just from this guy, but everything that this other business had, which is one of the reasons- Really?
Speaker 8: Basically, and we’ll get into this later, a non-Mormon couple made the mistake of getting into a business relationship with a Mormon company, Bricks & Minifigs, and the company essentially just [00:07:00] stole their franchise and all their assets and then gave it to a Mormon couple
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, they ba- That’s
Simone Collins: super ... Well, then they, there should be a clear-cut case to be like, “This, my contract was rendered invalid.”
Well,
Malcolm Collins: yeah, but the other person ... Again, I don’t wanna get into the details yet. Okay ... I’m just putting the broad, base-
Simone Collins: Well, I just, I, I’m glad that I brought that up because I think a lot of people are under the same impression that I was
Malcolm Collins: No, this other case is explains I think why, because it’s baffling.
This is a company that makes 10 million a year. They have 300 locations. For them to cause such a blowup over $200,000 when they were very clearly in the wrong on this, and all of their paperwork makes it clear they were in the wrong on this which we’ll get into, a baffling decision for somebody who used to run a company.
You just wouldn’t do this. We all the time gave... Even when, like, we’re not sure if the customer’s in the right or something like that generally it’s always just like, “Yeah, it’s not worth it.” Right? You know, just, just make it go away, right? For $200,000 this [00:08:00] should have been, especially when it was pretty clear that it was their, their fault, a just make it go away issue, but they didn’t.
And so we need to get into why they probably didn’t, because it’s actually almost kind of confusing that they didn’t.
Simone Collins: Huh.
Malcolm Collins: The... I actually think it has something to do with the store that they took over basically illegally. And it might implicate if they give back the money to this person, that they have to give back the money for everything else that they stole.
Simone Collins: Which it- Well, yeah. If, if they’re selling Legos on consignment and they are no longer honoring consignment agreements and just treating it like it’s inventory.
Malcolm Collins: No. Yeah. It’s not just that. So, okay. I’ll explain a little bit more.
Simone Collins: Thank
Malcolm Collins: you. The guy who originally owned it and had the stuff listed on consignment at the store- Mm-hmm
uh, Bricks & Minifigs messed up his banking information. They messed up his banking information, so he was unable to pay them normally. Then what they did is he, he worked with them in terms of [00:09:00] fixing it. It took a few months, okay? And they eventually worked it out, and at the end of the period where they worked it out, he then paid them the franchising cost for when he hadn’t, you know, when they, they had messed up his banking information, right?
And th- they agreed on the amount that he paid, they worked it out together, it was all amicable and things went ahead for a number of months. Then after, I don’t know how many months after this, maybe about four months after this or something like this corporate just comes in and says, “We are forcibly shutting down your location and taking control of all the assets in it,” because of this unpaid franchise thing.
But he had actually already paid the franchise thing and they have... Th- all of this is in writing, by the way. Oh. Right? Okay. They’re just asserting that, “Well, because you changed the format you paid it in during this period, it counts as unpaid, and we are seizing all of your assets.” Yeah, like,
Simone Collins: you didn’t do it exactly correct, and therefore, dot.dot, somehow we own everything.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And so then they seized all of, not just [00:10:00] the stuff in consignment, all of his inventory.
Simone Collins: Oh my gosh. Oh my gosh, that’s, that seems super easy to settle in court. Like, no one’s gonna accept that. That’s-
Malcolm Collins: Well, yeah, it’s really bad. But we’re seeing why they thought they could got a- get away with it. And it had to do with the community, and this is where it gets interesting and why me going over all the Mormon influencers covering this has been really interesting.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: Is this is not something that could have happened in a normal community, when they’re like, “Oh, there’s some bad Mormon members,” or something like that. Every incident tied to this case, whether it’s the police harassment of the people trying to handle this, the illegal jailing of people trying to handle this or the owner thinking that they could get away with this basically having the entire town government on their side, right?
And people are like, “Oh, this is normal small town stuff.” This is not [00:11:00] normal small town stuff, okay? There is a reason why this is going so mega viral, and everyone’s like, “I’ve never seen anything like this in my life.” This is not normal small town stuff.
Speaker 9: And as a note, I grew up in small town Texas in large part. Never did I see anything remotely like this. This is not normal small town behavior in America
Malcolm Collins: And the very fact that many Mormons watch this event and then respond with, “That’s just normal small town collusion”-
shows, I think, a degree of incompatibility with American culture.
Simone Collins: Small town
Malcolm Collins: collusion ... which is not good, because other Americans watch the Mormon go up and be like, “This is just a normal thing to happen in a town,” and they’re like, “
Simone Collins: Really?” It’s very hot vibes. I, I like
Malcolm Collins: it. What? No. Yeah. This isn’t a normal thing to happen.
This is an insane thing to happen. And when they’re like, “Oh, well, it’s just bad,” why are the police protecting a [00:12:00] private citizen here? And a, and a clear bad actor at this point, right? Why is the head of police going up and lying on behalf of this guy provably? Because we can show that he got the dates wrong on the things he was saying by things in pictures.
They’ve been able to recreate audio of what really happened during the raid, right? Because they had a camera on and that they, police knew they had no cause to do this. Why would the police go so far as to arrest a private citizen merely trying to get his property back? At one point, like to get how crazy this is, I don’t know if you’ve seen this They go to serve this guy his papers, and the police chief says this publicly, that the guy called the police and said he had his gun and he was thinking about shooting them because they were outside of his house trying to serve him his papers, which you have to do to start a court case.
The police then come, take the papers from this guy, say, “Are these even [00:13:00] real?” They then call up the court system. The court system tells them, “These are real papers.” The police says, “Oh, well then I guess I’ll go serve him the papers.” The guy refuses to take the papers from the police officer, okay? And then the police officer, what do they do after this?
They arrest him. The guy trying to do the normal part of the legal process, which is serving him his papers.
Simone Collins: Oh, on what grounds? It was on the grounds that they were not correct.
Malcolm Collins: Harassment for trying to serve someone their papers.
Simone Collins: Oh, for harassment? Okay. You
Malcolm Collins: have to serve ... For, if you’re unfamiliar, in the United States, you have to serve someone their papers.
You have to show that they opened their, the, the mail containing the legal stuff for the times to start on this stuff.
Simone Collins: It’s this, it’s just such a weird thing of like legal theater.
Malcolm Collins: It is weird, and I, we should probably ban it in the United States. It’s, it’s a stupid thing to have.
Simone Collins: It’s really stupid, yeah
Malcolm Collins: but secondarily and I know it could lead to negative externalities. There’s probably some other way we can do it, okay? But like this intentionally not [00:14:00] taking your papers, it should be able to show like you’re not legally allowed to not take your papers if a court something tries to serve them to you.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: And this is a position people could apply to, okay? Or like if you’re home or something like that, you know what I mean? But anyway and, and to get into like ... And, and when people are like, “Well, that doesn’t...” The reason the cops are colluding with the business is very clearly because of a Mormon church affiliation.
In addition to that, when the cops, because in one instance very clearly, fortunately we have video of this, they did not do a rolling stop. They stopped at a stoplight. The cops then pull over the car and immediately say like, you know, not, “Who’s driving here?” You know, “Did you do a stoplight?” They go, “Which one of you,” it’s in the YouTuber’s name Ben
Speaker 10: All the police footage of this, and as you can see, we didn’t even do a rolling stop. We fully stopped at the stop sign. So this is an illegal traffic stop. So who’s Ben? Uh, me. Ben, [00:15:00] how’s Utah? It’s good. You like it? Okay. It’s-
Malcolm Collins: .
And he’s like, “I’m Ben.” And the cop then says in like your most typical villain voice possible or, or more like crazy corrupt zombie town voice possible, “How are you liking your time in Utah?” Which is clearly code for among the Mormons, right? Like that, he meant, he meant it in a, in a very specific way.
And so then Mormons could come to me and say, “Well, it’s not like we or the church could do anything about this.” And the problem is, is yeah, they absolutely could. The Mormon church isn’t like a Protestant denomination where it’s decentralized and they can’t do anything. They actively and regularly excommunicate people over fairly trivial things.
Simone Collins: Well, you can, you could lose your, your temple recommends. Like, you, you could... There’s, yeah, actually, the LDS church is uniquely well-positioned to basically both kind of economically plus more spiritually disempower or freeze out people who are doing naughty [00:16:00] things. So yeah, you can absolutely slap people on the wrist, and it doesn’t even have to be temporary.
It can just be like, “Look, we’re gonna take away your temple recommends until you give this guy his Legos and stop being a jerk. You’re really making the
Malcolm Collins: church look bad.” It’d be, yeah, it’d be trivially easy for the church to handle.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But the church has decided not to handle it, and has a historic pattern of not handling things like this, which we’ll go over.
Mm. Which make them a negative externality to other parties. Yeah ... actually, let’s just go straight into this. Are you familiar, Simone-
Mountain Meadows Massacre.
Simone Collins: While you give that, the Mountain Meadows Massacre, just let me get Tex so you can give- Okay ... I just have to feed him. You can, you can, you can give the, you can give the Mountain- You, are
Malcolm Collins: you aware of it?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
It’s sad. Kids get hurt, so you should probably say it when I’m not here.
Malcolm Collins: All right. So the Mountains Meadow Massacre. In 1857 the m- members of the Church of Latter-day Saints, Mormons, killed 120 innocent immigrants who were simply [00:17:00] trying to...
They, they were also Appalachian immigrants, so my people, who were just trying to migrate to California through Mormon territory. Now it is true that Brigham Young sent them a letter telling them not to do this, and it didn’t reach them in time. But after they did it, no one was punished for 10 years, and only two people were ever excommunicated by the church, despite a large number of people being involved in this.
And the way that they did it was horrifying. They told the settlers, “Okay, well then just give us your guns and we’ll let you through the territory.” They gave them their guns, they separated them into three lines of men, women and children. They shot the men and the women, and then they
and then- or I should probably say something else there. And then with Styx, they did something until the other group wasn’t around anymore. And then [00:18:00] they tried to blame it all on Native Americans who were only lightly involved in it. The church worked to cover it up within the region. And to give you an idea, people maintained main positions of power within the Mormon church after this.
So if we look at an individual like, William H. Dame, who was the colonel, the commander of the Iron Military District and a high-ranking figure, he gave the final approval for the massacre. But was indicted because people wouldn’t speak out against him. The entire community stayed silent.
And he continued as a leadership figure within the church in the community afterwards. And then we also know other figures, like John Me Higbee, who was a participant, one of the, the people who, who did the beatings and everything like that. And he held positions in the church for years after this.. It was absolutely crazy, and for wondering why it wasn’t even tried until 10 years after the event, and the key perpetrators maintained positions in the church. Two of them [00:19:00] were eventually excommunicated, but only two of them when dozens of them took place. I mean, 100, over 100 people were massacred.
In case you’re wondering, children under seven were not unalived, and they were brought into Mormon families. But other than that, all the kids
So it’s important to remember that this behavior of treating people outside the community as if their lives’ welfare... Oh, and they took all the people’s property. They just stole it all and distributed it, right? Treating them like their lives don’t matter if they think they can get an advantage over them is a historic way that Mormons act, and is likely the way they would act in a society if they ever gained majority control again.
Mm. Given that we both see it historically and we see it in current behavior. That doesn’t mean they’re not a useful ally right now for our agenda. But in terms of groups gaining power in a region, one of the last groups you ever want to gain power is Mormons.
Speaker 12: And this is something that is reaffirmed every [00:20:00] time a Mormon says this is normal small town behavior, or, “Oh, these are just individual bad actors, and it’s irrelevant that they’re members of the church,” when the only reason anyone is acting this way is because of the church
Malcolm Collins: Mormons are only a really good ally because they are a minority right now, and they have to fight to protect the powers of minority traditions have to protect families from CPS, have to protect...
but the ways that they act when they have power has historically been pretty monstrous. And I think one of the things that this incident is bringing back for people-
Simone Collins: Oh ...
Malcolm Collins: is, “Oh yeah, Mormons aren’t just, like, sweet trad wives. They’re also the type of people who will beat your children to death if they think they can get away with it, and steal all your stuff,” right?
They, they also are the type of people who should genuinely be viewed adversarially if they’re ever about to gain majority of control of anything that you’re affiliated with. [00:21:00] And they could make themselves, I mean, Mormonism evolves very quickly. They could make themselves into something not like that, and I think a lot of people had the perspective before this event blew up in the way it did, that the church had moved on from that mindset, that church members had moved on from that mindset.
The idea of, “Okay, well, if we have bad members, we deal with it,” right? Like, that presumably that’s what the church did now, and now we are demonstrably seeing that is not the case. And worse, not only is it not the case, but the Mormon influencers who cover this show culturally The, the, like the wider Mormon community is nowhere near the place that they need to be to just, it’d be so trivial.
It would hurt the church not at all to just ring the just say, “Hey, we’re taking away your temple recommends card until you give this guy his money back.” Simplest thing ever. It would cause literally no damage [00:22:00] for them. Mm. The key reason they’re not doing this, right, the key reason they’re not getting involved in this is because fundamentally it would be punishing Mormons for protecting Mormons in a way that was immoral.
And they’re-
Simone Collins: Oh, see, I thought maybe they’ve had a conversation internally and been like, “If we remove their temple recommends or we do anything to associate ourselves with them to comment on this, it would imply, it would make it out i- in the open and too obvious that this is a Mormon thing.” Whereas now there is plausible deniability.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, there’s no plausible deniability.
Simone Collins: No.
Malcolm Collins: A- and I, I think that this is th- this is something that I think that Mormons when they’re watching this don’t get that non-Mormons are going through watching this. Mm-hmm. When we watch this, right? Mm. And we see the sheer- Mm ... injustice of what’s being carried out here and, and just the wantonness [00:23:00] of it, the, the total lack of like, once we dominate a region we treat outsiders however we want, right?
The, the sheer wantedness of it. Like it, it, it makes me feel like you’re, you’re much better off being a Muslim in Israel than you are being a non-Mormon in one of these small Mormon towns, because apparently the police just don’t work for you. They, they do not even care about the pretense of impartiality.
They don’t even care about the pretense that they’re anything other than... That’s what it looks like to a non-Mormon watching this. And if you’re a Mormon and you watch this and your blood is boiling and you’re angry at these individuals, it’s really important that you understand that I’d say about 80% of the non-Mormons watching this, when their blood is boiling and they’re directing that anger in a direction, it is at Mormonism.
Mm. Because the- Or at the church ... the whole pattern, the whole weirdness of it is clearly created by a Mormon cultural foundation. And the bigger problem is, is it could be fixed. All Mormons have to do is [00:24:00] speak up. But I then started thinking about this more broadly and realized this is a larger failure of the Mormon church.
Because I was thinking about like, actually, you know there’s another thing that I’m really surprised the Mormon church hasn’t banned. ‘Cause the Mormon church is willing to go out there and ban, you know, caffeine, although they loosen up- Not
Simone Collins: caffeine, hot drinks Yeah, hot drinks. Like basically just tea and coffee actually, not even really hot drinks
Malcolm Collins: from the words of wisdom. They ban gambling. Why can’t they ban MLMs? MLMs are a massive problem in the Mormon church. Worse than being a generic massive problem, they’re... Because of the way MLMs work, fundamentally the way that people, even if somebody is making money in an MLM, at the end of the day they’re only making money because they are disenfranchising more people downstream of it.
Okay? Now the prophet, the head of the Mormon church, has come out and said you shouldn’t use the Rolodexes you have from being a church member or church lists and stuff like that as part of your MLM prospecting.
Simone Collins: Hmm. [00:25:00]
Malcolm Collins: They could go a lot further than that because the core way that an MLM makes money is by basically scamming the people at the bottom of the pyramid, right?
And the problem is, is the way Mormon social communities work, and the reason MLM spread quickly within them, is because they’re very good at converting each other. They’re very good at trusting each other. They have very low levels of incredulity when it comes to other Mormons, as we’re seeing play out in this particular instance.
So the central church could come in and say, “We don’t do this anymore,” because overall this obviously hurts Mormons the most that we don’t ban this. But also the people who run the MLMs that are doing this are predominantly Mormon, and they donate a lot to the temple. And so it sort of ends up in a, if we can milk money out of people, and this is where I fundamentally changed my thoughts on Mormons when I started thinking about MLMs, because I used to give the temple an out, right?
When people are like, “Oh, look at the temple’s financial scandals in the past,” right? Like, they invested a bunch of money in a shopping mall, and I’m like, [00:26:00] “That’s what- the way you’re supposed to invest money, you doofus.” You know? That’s not a scandal. That’s a normal thing to do, okay?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But to not restrict or even advise against joining MLMs when every sane person knows that they end up impoverishing hundreds of thousands of average Mormons every year, right?
Just so that they can get more donations. That’s when I was like, “Oh, this is more Machiavellian than I thought,” right? This is more to its core sort of rotten than I really thought. Because the... And I even looked to see if they’d ever looked at doing that, and they’ve banned lots of other stuff. Like, why can you ban gambling and not MLMs?
Oh, because gambling institutions aren’t run by Mormons. I mean, the answer is obvious, right? Do you have thoughts before I go into the, the details of this particular case?
Simone Collins: No, please go ahead.
Malcolm Collins: One thing I want you to check out, Simone, ‘cause I’d be very interested to [00:27:00] know. Can you check if the original owners of the store, the one who basically had the store stolen from them-
Simone Collins: Okay
Malcolm Collins: if they were Mormons too?
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. So Bricks & Mini figs operate franchises. The whole dispute stems from a deal made between a man called Brian Manswell and the former franchisee, law/Gorman.
Brian’s father had a massive collection of allegedly $200,000 but he’s now in poor health, so they were looking to sell. The owners of the store agreed to a consignment, meaning that they would hold all the sets at no cost, during which time the Manswell would still technically own them and they would advertise to sell them.
We’ve already explained this After taking consignment, the franchisees went to B&M corporate and told them that they were considering moving out of the country and inquired on the process of selling the store. Corporate responded by forcing them out and illegally taking possession of the store.
There is an actual video of the owners explicitly mentioning having the consignment and the corporate res- representative responding [00:28:00] by saying that they will handle it and take responsibility. So they both knew it and represented that they were to handle it, even when later they’re like, “Well, we say we don’t handle consignment.”
Yeah, but you signed a thing saying you would handle it, so you’re responsible for it. B&M install new owners in the Salem store J- Joshua Johnson and Brandon Best. Both of these franchisees and corporates refused to honor the consignment agreement, stating that consignments are prohibited by contract and that they have no responsibility for an unauthorized agreement entered in between Manswell and the previous owners.
Although, once again, their contract contradicts this, as does the actual video recording of the employees saying that they will take it on. It gets particularly awkward at this joint because B&M’s official stance is that they could only identify 5K worth of Legos, which potentially belong to Mansfeld, and they supposedly offered to give these over, but not reimburse for the tens of thousands of missing sets.
For the part of Manswell and Reckless Ben, the YouTuber who joined forces with Manswell to take the case they allege that this isn’t true at all and that they are in [00:29:00] possession of more sets. Or at least they were by the time they took over the store. Now, note he’s able to prove that they had more sets because they had the sets for sale in their online store after they took it over, and he was just able to look at them and be like, “Here, these are the sets,” right?
So they’re provably, again, lying. What ensure... What ensues is a bunch of back and forth, “You have my sets/money,” and no, B&M in no uncertain words, threatened him stating that the cost of taking them to court would be prohibitively expensive and than he’d ever make off the sets and that they intended to drag out the case if he tries.
So, after more nonsense they get accused of trespassing. They finally take them to small claims court, and they sort of trick them into not responding to the claims court and ended up winning $200,000. Then they go to collect the money, and they had shut down the store that day. To understand how severe this was they didn’t even tell like children who had their birthday parties at the store that it [00:30:00] was
Simone Collins: about to be
Malcolm Collins: shut
Simone Collins: down.
Oh. And they ended- This is clearly to evade. I see. Wow.
Malcolm Collins: They ended up sitting in the parking lot during their birthday after they had rented out and paid them for the spot that, that was multiple kids’ birthdays because they just didn’t handle it. A- and again, we see here complete uncaring for non-Mormons.
So, were you able to find out?
Simone Collins: Yeah. The only confirmed members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are the corporate owners in Utah, not the original franchisees in Salem. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: no, no. The new franchisees who took over, I’m pretty sure, are, are confirmed Mormon. So when they stole it from the original franchisees, they gave it to a Mormon family.
Look that- Did they?
Simone Collins: Okay, the incoming Utah-affiliated owners of the same franchise location, Joshua Johnson and Brandon Best are described in coverage and videos as Mormons. So yes. So the,
Malcolm Collins: a Mormon corporate illegally took possession of the store and all its property and gave it to a Mormon family. And people are [00:31:00] like, “What does this have to do with Mormonism?”
But then- Well,
Simone Collins: they’re not a family. It’s Joshua Johnson and Brandon Best, but-
Malcolm Collins: Oh, I guess two Mormon c- people. Okay.
Simone Collins: Yes.
But allegedly, too, because as described in, in basic- like, like according to the YouTube coverage and on Wikipedia, they’re Mormons, but again, allegedly. Okay.
Malcolm Collins: So what, what happened with him and the cops, to go over this.
There was a traffic stop where they alleged that they had heroin in the car after a two-hour search showed up nothing. They then switched track and start saying that they got dilated pupils, which by the way, is the opposite of when you have heroin. They finally gave up. That- Wait,
Simone Collins: really? Cocaine would cause that.
Wouldn’t heroin dilate your pupils?
Malcolm Collins: I think heroin causes constricted pupils, or I’ll go into this in, in notes.
Yep, I was right here. Heroin constricts pupils, the exact opposite of the reason they said they pulled him over
Malcolm Collins: Okay?
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: And note, we have from their cams, because it’s been leaked, that the cops said, “We have nothing [00:32:00] to, to, how do we get them?” Basically just seeing outsiders as annoying, describing them as annoying.
They, were, it’s multiple unfounded traffic stops during which the police officer immediately addresses Bin in the backseat of the car by his name, being like, “We know who you are. That’s why we’re pulling this car over,” even though there is zero reason to do so. Several police call-outs while trying to serve papers to Best, where the cops said...
And, and keep in mind, in one of these call-outs, and the chief of police admits this, he said he was thinking about shooting these people, okay? And had his gun, which I think might even be an illegal thing to do. I’m, I’m not sure, but I don’t think you can be like, “I’m thinking about shooting you,” while waving a gun at somebody.
Fi- yeah, that’s got to be illegal.
Speaker 13: Yes, this would count as brandishing a weapon and a criminal threat. So it is absolutely crazy that the chief of police literally is listing a criminal threat that this man is making to the chief of police as in his defense of his actions, in his defense of not [00:33:00] arresting the guy who made the criminal threat.
Uh, my God
Malcolm Collins: The, the cops just keep coming back every time he does this, removing him when he’s trying to serve papers. Finally he gets arrested on some bogus charges for putting up advertising on a GoFundMe. So that was what they... And this was wild. He’s like, “Is it illegal to put up a GoFundMe?”
And they’re like, “It is if you list the people’s names on the GoFundMe.” Okay? The p- the problem is, is that that would be libel. That would not be a criminal offense that you could go to jail over. And they put him in jail without bail as well, so he couldn’t- Ugh ... keep filming, ‘cause that’s what they were afraid of.
Oh. So it’s gotten astronomically worse because of this. And then the police going up. They, there’s video of them going up to him, and he’s just standing there in the video. They say that he was acting roughly, but he’s clearly just standing there. They grab his arm and dislocate his shoulder.
Speaker 14: Now, you understand me? Don’t move like that. Okay? [00:34:00] Yeah, this cop pulled my arm so far back it dislocated my shoulder. He claims it’s because I was attempting to make an escape or something. Don’t move like that. You understand me? Don’t move like that. Don’t move quick. Everybody just-
Malcolm Collins: Oh my gosh
this happens because his shoulder is very easy to dislocate. Apparently it’s happened to him a lot. And so he’s very aware of the sensation and what happens. Mm. And he put up a image of what a stock dislocated shoulder looks like in his video, and the police were like, “See? That’s a stock photo.”
It’s like, of course he couldn’t get a real one. You guys had him in jail and wouldn’t allow him to be X-rayed, right? Like, um So, and I’ll note here, we always call out communities when they’re not dealing with their own, right? And I do this, we did this with the ADL and Chabad with the Jewish community when we talked about speed running a pogrom.
We’re now doing it even with communities that we’re fairly close with. It’s the Mormon community. Because this is astronomically bad. The level of brutality that we are seeing here in sort of a, a global stage in, in like an American town, right? And people can be [00:35:00] like, “Oh, like this isn’t as bad as like the, the grape gangs in Britain and stuff like that,” right?
And it’s like, no, it’s, it’s not exactly, but you’ve got to understand to your average American who comes from a non-Mormon culture, it actually kind of looks worse. And the reason it looks worse is the sheer audacity with which it’s done, and the extent and, and the brazenness of the attempt to cover up, which implies to everyone all around, like if you were living in one of these communities or if these people had power, this is the way they treat you.
And what’s worse is the way Mormon influencers have reacted, which is to see this and be like, “Either this is normal small town stuff, or what can we do about it? It’s just individual bad actors.” And it’s like there are plenty of channels a Mormon can use to attempt to address this. Okay, so since all of this...
By the way, do, do you wanna say anything? [00:36:00]
Simone Collins: I hadn’t thought about it this way when hearing about the drama. Like, I hadn’t heard, thought about it of like, “Oh, so you wanna know what it’s like to live in a, an LDS caliphate? A Catholic caliphate?” Like, look at what happens in the Hot Fuzz version of a Catholic town, an LDS town, a Baptist town, and I guess this is kind of interesting and telling.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And, and- I appreciate you framing it this way ... and note here they can be like, oh, I actually lived when I was a kid we had a ranch. And so I lived in a small Texas town for a lot of my life. And I had encounters with the cops there and everything like that. I had encounters with other business people there.
Let me tell you what, in a small Texas town, nobody is acting like this. I don’t care if they go to the same church, they’re interested in what’s right, not what church they go to, okay? And if you wanna be like, “Well, what’s it like to be an outsider in a small Texas town? I’m sure it’s horrible there, too.”
Who’s an outsider in a small Texas town? Leaflet. [00:37:00] She always talks about her town glowingly, right? Never had any problems with the locals, right? And, and, and so I, I wanna point out here again, this is not normal, right? Thoughts before I go further, Simone.
Simone Collins: Yeah, I mean, well, I’ve been in many small random towns in various places in the world where people are super chill.
So yeah, this is not normal at all.
Malcolm Collins: Okay, so i- in terms of what’s happened, basically it’s all escalating. The police have not backed down at all. They did a, a press thing saying blah, blah, blah. Yeah, I
Simone Collins: saw footage from the press conference. Goodness gracious.
Malcolm Collins: The head of the company the, the, the toy company they- For its amazing
made an announcement basically saying, “We did nothing wrong.” I guess I should, again, ‘cause we covered this a bit at the beginning, but I want to, As business owners go into this again, okay? This is not a normal thing for a company to do. We have had-
Simone Collins: Yeah, in, in the midst of acquiring, buying or selling a, a company, what typically [00:38:00] happens is there are two ways you can buy or sell a company.
You can buy all the company’s stocks. It could be a stock purchase or, like, transfer of ownership, or it can be an asset purchase or transfer of ownership. And it’s almost always assets, because people don’t want a stock purchase. It, it involves a transfer of liabilities that no one really wants. And so when you do an asset purchase or some kind of change of ownership of assets you also have to make a bunch of assignment agreements.
When we acquired a business on behalf of investors, the, the deal was almost lost over lawyers losing their minds over assignment agreements. We actually almost lost the deal because we refused to have every single vendor sign an assignment agreement saying basically, “We will transfer our contract from the old corporation to the new corporation that’s acquiring the assets.”
So this is just one of those things that, like, lawyers that get involved are crazy [00:39:00] about because it can, it can kill a business. It’s really important. The ownership of these things matters. All this stuff is really well documented, and this is not something that you just, like, miss. It’s not something, “Oh,” like, you got lost in the shuffle.
Like, I thought, I thought these were ours. Like wait, wait, no, what? Yeah.”
Malcolm Collins: Yes, but this is the type of thing that, like, in a nor- if it was done normally, would have been a very long discussion, right? Yeah. And it- Or not ... and it, I mean, it was to the extent that it was filmed, right? Not a
Simone Collins: very
Malcolm Collins: long
Simone Collins: discussion.
So we do know that it happened. It just would have been, like, you know, we are assigning these, these as- these consignment contracts and, and the associated assets from business A to business B. That’s it. It’s very simple. Like, okay, great, now we have, you know, th- these assets that we will sell and we’re obligated to sell, to, to give a certain cut of the profits to this person.
Like, it’s so simple. And this is not something that is missed.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. No, no. I mean, for corporate to shut down a franchise and transfer its assets without the franchisee’s approval, when they weren’t in clear violation [00:40:00] to another party is- One, that’s insane. But then two, when the lawsuit came in, like the small $200,000 lawsuit, and you might be like, “That’s a big lawsuit.”
That is not a big lawsuit for a company the size of B&M. Bricks and
Simone Collins: Minifigs?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, Br- Bricks and Minifigs. It, it, it, it is literally, like it- in terms of what... I’m, I’m not gonna say it’s a rounding error, but it’s the type of thing, I would say over the course of the last few years in running our business, there have been multiple instances where sometimes you just get hit, where like it turns out an one of your employees did something wrong, $50,000 or something like that.
You get hit with it. You pay it out. You always pay it out. You never sit on that money because the, the lawsuit and the reputational damage is just too big, right? The idea that they wouldn’t do this, that they’d be like, “Oh, we’re just gonna ignore the legal case here,” right? Like, we’re... Or, or to even let it get to legal, right?
Over $200,000, which is nothing, is [00:41:00] astonishing and it displays- Well,
Simone Collins: and this also, it’s not $200,000 that they paid for. It’s $200,000 of potential profit that they seized. Again, this is what it was valued at. This is not what it’s being sold for, though I imagine with inflation it’s probably being
Malcolm Collins: sold for that price.
No, no, no, but I just mean not just handing them $200,000 to make them go away.
Simone Collins: Oh, I see. Yeah. No, right, just buying it from them as, as a corporation. Oh, I see what you’re saying. Yeah. Yeah, as opp- They shouldn’t have even waited to sell it on consignment. They should’ve just bought it from them.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, no, when, when people start making a stink like this, it’s generally good to just give them the money and make them go away.
Right? I
Simone Collins: see. Yeah, just buy them off. Yeah, that, that would’ve been simpler. But I mean, I think also they could’ve just been like, “Okay, we will honor your consignment agreement. Like, we will sell it or if you wanna take it back, take it back. We won’t sell it. I don’t care.”
Malcolm Collins: No, but the ob- the obvious correct choice is just give them the money, right?
Mm-hmm. Like, that is... Sorry, running businesses, we have had to make this choice around large amounts of money. Not this large, but like $25,000 or something. We probably have to make [00:42:00] it about once a year a, a decision like this, I’d say in the range between, like, 25,000 and $50,000. And it’s j- it sucks, but it’s just part of doing business.
That they wouldn’t, or that they had adopted a business practice where all throughout corporate, keep in mind, it, it, it, this required both the owners of the shop deciding not to do anything about this and corporate deciding not to do anything about this, which likely required layers of decision-making in addition to whatever the police were doing required a mindset that I think- Mm
unfortunately for a lot of people, what a lot of people are gonna take away from this is, “Oh, if you do business with a Mormon and you create a successful store they’ll just take that away from you and give it to a Mormon family one day.” As b-
Simone Collins: This is bad too, because Mormons are, have, have a really otherwise great professional reputation.
Especially LDS men who have served on missions, because they have basically gone through trial by [00:43:00] fire with patience, persistence, friendliness, sales skills, cold calling. Like, this is an amazing- They’re great
Malcolm Collins: salespeople ...
Simone Collins: yeah, like you, and, and they are disproportionately well represented in the CIA, like many high level good, like, government roles and stuff because it’s like, okay, these are people who are consistent, trustworthy, honorable values aligned, Mm
like, good. And, and stuff like this takes that reputation and weakens it, weakens it significantly because there’s this now negative baggage.
Malcolm Collins: Well, it inverts it to an extent. It’s like, oh, M- Mormons might make great employees, but never trust a Mormon in a Mormon-controlled territory if, if they are in the majority position or, or, or running a bus- business.
Like, never trust them to do... And, and if you’re like, “Well, how can you apply this to...” Again, this is the problem with a centralized church. Because you have a centralized church and the church isn’t doing anything about this, and you could say that’s not the church’s role, and it’s like w- the church’s role is to [00:44:00] make the lives of Mormons better, right?
To advance the Mormon cause. Yes, it is their role to handle negative PR when it comes up, right? Even if it’s through back channels, even if it’s through the guy’s local pastor or something like that. There, there are few things happening right now that are more the church’s role. The bigger problem is the idea that like, oh, we can Because as I pointed out, the situation arose because of Mormon culture, peculiarities of Mo- Mormon culture.
If it arose because of peculiarities of Mormon culture, obviously people are gonna blame it on Mormonism, so you could use peculiarities of Mormon culture to address it. Except the opposite has happened.
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: Right? A, a denial of responsibility and saying these are individual bad actors. Yeah. And to that extent, I think one thing that I’m gonna...
Because we’ve done a number of videos where we called out communities protecting their own bad actors, and how that externalizes them as a threat for everyone around them.
Simone Collins: Yeah, I think at this point we’ve called out Catholics and Jews for this, [00:45:00] right?
Malcolm Collins: No, not Catholics for this. Jews heavily
Simone Collins: for this.
Have we, have we yet, we haven’t yet called out, or maybe me- mentioning- Jews and trans
Malcolm Collins: people, and now
Simone Collins: Mormonism on the left ... you’ve called out Mennonites for this because of the whole rape thing.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, the rape. Well, yeah, no, but th- th- that’s different. The, the, I guess, yeah, the Catholics did attempt to protect.
But anyway, I want to go and say that as, because now I’ve realized we’ve got a number of people who follow the religion we created, techno-puritanism so, just sort of like as a Malcolm words of wisdom or whatever, like- ... when this w- techno-puritan central organization is finally set up, the, the index when we have all of the tools for setting it up one of its core roles should be policing the morality of members with ability to excommunicate for demonstrably- I was
Simone Collins: just thinking of like-
immoral acts ... well, policing bad actors. It’s not so much- Mm ... about policing morality as it is policing people who are doing harm in society.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I think do, m- m- yeah, that’s the better way to do it. It doesn’t matter their [00:46:00] personal morality, their morality at home or anything like that. Only when they externalize harm onto other communities and the higher threat than externalizing harm on other communities is protecting a member of the techno-puritan community who is externalizing harm on other communities.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Don’t protect bad actors I mean, look, it put a target on the back of the progressive movement too. I was just looking at there’s been both, like, on X and through mainstream media, coverage of dwindling support, for example, gay marriage. It had its high at almost... So almost half of Republicans supported gay marriage around 2019.
And then I think it peaked at 2021. Between 2021 and 2024, it went from just under 50% of Republicans supporting gay marriage to now about 31%. And I think a lot of that had to do with the progressive movement on the whole supporting bad actors. And-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ...
Simone Collins: trying to impose culture on people who don’t want that culture imposed on them.
Whereas before, the framing had always [00:47:00] been, “Just let us live our lives. Please, just let us live our lives.” And everyone’s like, “Yeah, okay. I’ll, like, that’s fine.” And
Malcolm Collins: this is the thing where the gays could say, “Well, there’s no king gay that could, you know, do something about this.” King gay. The problem is there is a king Mormon who can do something about this.
Oh. There is a central organization, and there’s people paid very good money- I thought you were gonna say
Simone Collins: there’s a gay king, and I’m like, “Who’s the king of the gays?” This
Malcolm Collins: is exciting. Actually, did you know that the United States military spent hundreds of thousands of dol- I think it might have been arou- around a few million dollars trying to find the king of the gays?
Simone Collins: Wait, what?
Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah. D- did you know the name of the person they were looking for?
Simone Collins: No.
Malcolm Collins: They, they, they ended up doing a dragnet to attempt to find- A
Simone Collins: dragnet? Sorry.
Malcolm Collins: S- Simone, I said they, they did a dragnet to attempt to find Dorothy.
Simone Collins: Huh? I don’t get it.
Malcolm Collins: You don’t, you know how you say you are gay back in the day, “I’m a friend of Dorothy.”
Simone Collins: Oh, no. I’ve never heard that before. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: you’ve never heard the saying? I [00:48:00] was- It was a behind the way to say- No ... I’m gay is I’m a friend of Dorothy. Wait, really? And so they thought Dorothy, which meant Dorothy from The Wizard of Oz, was a real person. And so they attempted to
Simone Collins: find- They thought Dorothy was the king of the gays?
Like
Malcolm Collins: the, the key network o- or of the gays who like made the whole gay social scene work, this mysterious Dorothy.
Simone Collins: That’s amazing. I thought you were making a pun with Dragnet. I, yeah, I don’t know. I, I, I wish that in the US military we just started recruiting for like, it was the Band of Thebes, right?
Just like a, a, a gay subset. That would be so cool. That’d be so hot.
Malcolm Collins: Band of Thebes. Yeah, no, but all, all gay regiments. That’s the way we should do gays in the
Simone Collins: military. You, no, I, I think, yeah. Like, we, we need to start having affiliate of regiments. Like, I want, I want the militant lesbians regiment. I want the Band of Thebes 2.0 USA edition.
I want
Malcolm Collins: the- I actually think you could probably do a pretty good job ... I
Simone Collins: want, I want the furries. I want the furry regiment. I want them fighting in costume, but with like heads up displays inside their, [00:49:00] their like fursona heads. I, I want, I want affiliate of ad hoc-
Malcolm Collins: But, but anyway, ...
Simone Collins: military bands.
Malcolm Collins: This has been really interesting to see.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: I think people are underestimating the cultural effect of this movement long-term. This moment has blown up in a way that, I mean, literally this is like, I, I, I think in terms of like average home penetration, the Tiger King of this, this d- you know-
Simone Collins: I don’t, I don’t know if it’s Tiger King level, but I will say that this has been surprisingly well-covered.
I’m kinda like, ugh, like do we really care that much?
Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, what I wanted to cover it as from a, like, as how’s it gonna change society? It’s gonna make people significantly more suspicious of Mormons or ever allowing Mormons to get power, and it makes me suspicious of Mormons. Like, I wanna be clear, it makes me suspicious when Mormons who I thought were normal, sane people are like, “This is just a few bad actors.
This isn’t a Mormon [00:50:00] problem.” Completely, when Mormon culture leads to bad action, completely saying, “Oh, not my responsibility,” I was like, “Oh, okay, well, f- me then,” right? You know? We just need to grow the techno-puritan alli- you know, federation. Y- get more members, continue to grow, have lots of babies.
And then you, you guys can have an organization you can join that doesn’t have lots of crazy scandals. And it actually punishes its own bad actors. Wouldn’t that be fun?
Simone Collins: I guess, you know, the, the OG Puritans were pretty famous for doing that, but sometimes they went a little too far. You know- But they did do-
witch hunts and all that.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. That’s- The, the OG Puritans did punish their own community members when they externalized power more. A
Simone Collins: lot. No, it was like, it was a pa- it was a national pastime. We did, we went overboard. We’re like, “You said something about your dog. You need to die.” All sorts of things.
Very, very overboard. But anyway, that’s it’s-
Malcolm Collins: Well, I, yeah, my biggest takeaway of this is no matter how aligned [00:51:00] you are with a group, I guess what this hammers home for me is- Well, all other groups are fundamentally evil. We need to grow our own
Simone Collins: and
Malcolm Collins: be prepared to- Oh, for th- Like, but I, but I’m sorry, groups I keep thinking are, are okay.
It, it does
Simone Collins: The Mormons are fine. Look, I think this had to do more with messy governance and people not coordinating well on this, and maybe the, the mechanism by which you know, temple recommends are revoked or established just not really working well, it being kind of complicated. Because I think that temple recommends, I, I don’t know the full way that, like, you get them, but I think they happen at the bishop level.
So, like, also you have to keep in mind that, like, they, the bishop who’s responsible for the various policemen and then the various corporate people, like, it’s all separate non-coordinating volunteers who have full-time jobs, by the way. [00:52:00] Like, there’s also the fact that this is a church that, except at the very highest levels, is made up of entirely volunteer work of, of full-time employed people.
Malcolm Collins: Hold on, Simona. I, I don’t... No. The, the, they, the temple could act if they wanted to. The local bishop could act if they wanted to. And if people are like, “It’s
Simone Collins: not the church’s-”
Malcolm Collins: Right,
Simone Collins: but also they’re kind of busy. Things fall through the cracks when you do this much
Malcolm Collins: If, if, if people are like, “It’s not the church’s job to police people’s morality,” that’s literally exactly their job, right?
It’s to, it’s to help people live moral lives. It’s not the church’s job to protect the church’s reputation. That’s literally... Like, those are their two only jobs. And if you’re like, “Well, they never get involved in civil matters or something like that,” or well, maybe they should, you know? In, in this particular instance.
Because they have this whole- Look, I,
Simone Collins: I imagine that there might be some reckoning or discussion that takes place after this having happened, but that wouldn’t surprise me. So-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, it’ll just be too late then. They, they have literally days to react at this point. [00:53:00]
Simone Collins: Yeah. But I think if they act quickly, they can fend off reputational damage somewhat.
Malcolm Collins: So yeah, we’ll see if they do it.
Simone Collins: Let me- Time
Malcolm Collins: will tell ... it would have to be pretty severe at this point, whatever they do, but we’ll see.
Simone Collins: Mm, it, this’ll blow over pretty fast, I think.
Malcolm Collins: No, it won’t.
Simone Collins: We’ll see then. I’m, I’m
Malcolm Collins: obviously team Mormon. This will be a lasting cultural memory for a generation.
Simone Collins: Ah, I don’t know.
I, I doubt.
Malcolm Collins: Just keep in mind, it’s not... Every single one of the largest streamers has done something on this
Simone Collins: Yeah, it’s true. Yeah, this is ... And on both sides of the political spectrum too. It’s just basically like everyone is excited to dunk, to dunk on-
Malcolm Collins: This, this is the new Carol Baskin ... corporate Bricks &
Simone Collins: Minifigs.
Malcolm Collins: But worse, because I didn’t feel a visceral anger- I
Simone Collins: thought there were a bunch of Team Carol people. There are no Team Bricks & Minifigs people. Oh no, there’s a few Team Carol people,
Malcolm Collins: but that’s the thing. Like, with Carol, I was disgusted by her, but I didn’t feel a visceral rage at her like I do these people.
Simone Collins: Well, right, and this, this is a very unidirectional thing. Everyone [00:54:00] hates Brits- Bricks & Minifigs. Yeah. And everyone-
Malcolm Collins: And the local police department.
Simone Collins: And well, of course, and the, the local police department, which is acting ... Yeah, no, like, the, the, it’s, it’s
Malcolm Collins: one of these- They’re acting like a pod person town, okay?
That’s what they’re acting like.
Simone Collins: Oh, gosh.
Malcolm Collins: I, I, I have no other way to describe this other than bizarre and otherworldly. It borders on having accidentally driven into a horror movie, when you see, like, the police pull them over and be like, “Which one of you is Ben? How’s it feel to be in Utah?” That’s bizarre and pod person-y, okay?
Okay. That’s not a normal thing to do or say.
Simone Collins: It’s not great. Yeah. It’s it’s not great.
I agree. Well, we’ll see. I love you, though.
Malcolm Collins: Love you too.
Simone Collins: I’ll see you in data center
Malcolm Collins: You had the kids walk around with bagpipes today. One, one of our fans- Yeah, we had
Simone Collins: an award-winning- ... provided them with bagpipes ... bagpiper perform for our kids, and [00:55:00] they thought it was the coolest thing ever.
I mean, of course, in the moment they just looked stunned ‘cause what else do you do the first time you encounter a bagpipe? You’re like, “What is happening to me right now?” But he played a perfect... Oh, like, two perfect songs, just really good. Wow, what a day. I was just thinking, I was... To this weekend, I took this kids to this spot up on the hill, the, that picnic rock by the old stone bridge, and I told them it was where the fairies were, and they thought it was too windy for fairies, which is fair.
You know, mosquitoes can’t land on you when it’s too windy, and I don’t think fairies can be out either. And then I, I pulled up pictures using Google Image of the Cottingley Fairies, ‘cause it was like, oh yeah, like famously young children have found fairies in, in the, in the woods. And I thought it would be convincing because, you know, like, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was a huge fan of the Cottingley Fairies.
He’s like, “Oh, this confirms it.” And of course, Tosia looks at them and he’s like, “Wow, [00:56:00] fairies.” And Titan looks at it and she’s like, “Oh, the cotton candy fairies.” And then she just assumes that they make cotton candy, so that’s all she fixates on. That she wants not cottonlea, Cottingley or whatever
Malcolm Collins: fairies.
What is the Cottingley Fairies? Is this a scam or something? It’s
Simone Collins: the girls... You know those pictures of young girls with fairies? And they, they’d convinced... They, they ran, wandered off into the woods with their father’s camera and took pictures and then came back. Their father developed the photos, and lo and behold, the girls are posing next to beautiful fairies.
And at the time, no one could figure out what it was. They could confirm the photos were not doctored at all. Of course it turns out that- The girls had just cut out illustrations of fairies and arranged them well and took pic- pictures. Like, they were very good amateur photographers, but, like, they’d fooled a bunch of adults, including the writer of the Sherlock series.
This, [00:57:00] the clever man. Octavian takes one look at the photos and he’s like, “They just cut out pictures of fairies.” And I’m like, “
Malcolm Collins: What?” Oh, I love Octavian already. Smarter than Sherlock.
Simone Collins: What on earth? What on earth, Octavian?
Malcolm Collins: You are, you are too great at the fairy-
Simone Collins: But, but this, this is the same kid who, like, turns to me and is like, “Well, can I take my esophagus to Target?”
Because I, I have told him he can use a $25 Target gift card if he can just do the basic addition and subtraction he needs to in order to tell if he has, like, toys within his budget. You know, like, okay, well, you bought something with $4 and then... and another thing- Yeah ... with $2. How much money do you have left?
Then he can use the gift card. And, and he, he just doesn’t wanna do the math, and so I, I, I bought him an abacus, and he keeps calling it his esophagus, and it’s very annoying.
Malcolm Collins: And he wants to take it to Target to do the math? And he wants to take his esophagus to Target, ‘cause then
Simone Collins: he [00:58:00] can- Does he
Malcolm Collins: actually know how to do math on the abacus?
Simone Collins: Yes, he can do esophagus math, thank you very much.
Malcolm Collins: You taught him that?
Simone Collins: Yes. Well, th- this thing, it’s been around for, what, thousands of years. It’s extremely intuitive. You count the freaking beads. It’s, it’s really good- I, well, I know there’s, like- ... for developing number sense. ...
Malcolm Collins: specific ways to do, like, multiplication and stuff on it.
Simone Collins: Yeah. No, he’s not at that level. We’re at the, like, the beads move on this side, and here’s, you know, just move over the 10 beads.
Malcolm Collins: Addition and subtraction, okay, great.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Great, great. No we’re not, like, at the- But I love that he’s- We’re not- ... teaching technical terms here ... Peruvian mountain traders yet, no.
Malcolm Collins: And people are like... Again, when they’re like, “Why don’t you just teach your kids the Christian stories in the traditional way?” And I’m like, “Because I know my kids are like me, and they’re going to be very, very skeptical people.” They just
Simone Collins: cut out the fair- pictures of fairies. I can’t believe it. Anyway.
Yeah. I thought, I thought I was just gonna completely entrance the children and Octavian just has to blow it off. .
Malcolm Collins: Immediately. All right. Well, I’m gonna get started here. I’m, I’m proud of
Simone Collins: you. [00:59:00] Okay.
Speaker 16: Do you think the answer is still gonna be there? Let’s, we’ll find out
Well, we’re in a more sheltered area, so it’s nice and calm here. Feels good, right?
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins tackle one of the most provocative questions in the age of AI: Does artificial intelligence finally make communism feasible?
They explore the structural failures of historical communism (incentives, power consolidation, information problems, and catastrophic mismanagement), why small-scale communism works (families, kibbutzim) but large-scale versions collapse, and whether AI-driven post-scarcity could solve these issues or simply replicate the same human problems of bad actors, bureaucracy, and distorted incentives.
Topics include:
* The Sam Altman UBI study and why unconditional cash transfers often fail
* Why Soviet science succeeded in some areas but governance always failed
* Power vacuums in anarcho-communism vs. centralized systems
* The future of “techno-fiefdoms,” AI-managed communities, and human reserves for those left behind by AI disruption
* Demographic collapse and the likely rise of religious/techno-puritan movements
A raw, nuanced debate that challenges both right-wing and left-wing assumptions about economics, human nature, and the coming AI era.
Show Notes
Why Implementations Fail
* Economic calculation problem (Ludwig von Mises, 1920):
* Without private property and market prices, planners lack information on relative scarcity/costs.
* You can’t rationally allocate steel, labor, or grain.
* Attempts at “material balances” or cybernetic planning (e.g., Soviet OGAS—an attempted nationwide information network) failed repeatedly.
* HOW AI CAN FIX THIS
* Adequately and dynamically track supply and demand
* Incentive and knowledge problems (Hayek):
* People respond to incentives.
* Common ownership dilutes responsibility (”tragedy of the commons”).
* Local knowledge is dispersed; central decrees can’t match it.
* AI can just more adequately monitor dispersed local knowledge
* Innovation and maintenance collapse without profit/loss signals.
* If AI becomes like a mother and just “handles” everything, then it’s not an issue
* Power dynamics:
* Enforcing abolition of private property and markets requires massive coercion.
* With AI, we’re approaching a place where the majority of the population won’t have anything (or anything to lose), property-wise.
* This concentrates power in a vanguard/party, which becomes a new ruling class (see Milovan Djilas’ The New Class).
* We might see a bifurcated society: One ruling elite doing their own thing, then AI-led/governed communist societies for everyone else
* The state doesn’t wither; it entrenches (Orwell, Animal Farm).
* This is more of an issue when the state is fighting over something desirable, but what we’re looking at is a society largely abandoned by the elite.
* Human nature (loaded with self-interest, status-seeking, family preferences as it is) doesn’t vanish.
* Not a problem if a non-biological mind is governing.
* Repeated patterns:
* Initial revolutionary fervor lead to…
* purges of “wreckers”/kulaks, which lead to
* Shortages, which lead to…
* blame external enemies/capitalism, which lead to…
* more controls, which lead to…
* corruption/black markets, which lead to…
* reform or collapse
* This is not bad luck or “revisionism”; it’s structural.
* Even small-scale communes (e.g., 19th-century utopian ones, Israeli kibbutzim long-term, or modern intentional communities) often dissolve due to free-riding, exit of talent, and disputes over “needs.”
* HOWEVER, with AI, I imagine communism to not come as a revolution, but rather a deus ex machina saving the leftovers in society from death.
Why has “real communism never been tried?”
“Real communism has never been tried” is a rhetorical defense that shifts the definition of communism away from every historical implementation. It functions as a motte-and-bailey tactic or “no true Scotsman” fallacy: the ideal (a stateless, classless, moneyless society of perfect equality and abundance) is defended, while real-world attempts are dismissed as insufficiently pure.
Defenders counter with “not real” because:
* Stalin/Mao “betrayed” the revolution.
* No stateless end-stage achieved.
* External sanctions/wars interfered.
* “State capitalism” or “deformed socialism.”
What “real communism” means in theory
Marx and Engels described:
* Socialism as the transitional stage: proletarian dictatorship, state ownership of production.
* Communism as the higher stage: state “withers away,” common ownership, “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” no classes, no money, no scarcity.
Lenin, Trotsky, and later Marxists added layers like vanguard parties and democratic centralism to get there.
Every major attempt followed Marxist blueprints:
* USSR (1917-1991): Bolshevik Revolution, War Communism, collectivization, Five-Year Plans. Result: Holodomor famine (millions dead), Gulags, purges, stagnation, collapse. Leaders admitted severe deviations but blamed “capitalist encirclement” or “bureaucracy.”
* China (1949-): Great Leap Forward (30+ million dead from famine), Cultural Revolution, mass starvation and chaos. Shifted to market reforms under Deng for survival; current system is state capitalism with CCP control.
* Cambodia (Khmer Rouge, 1975-79): Explicitly tried Year Zero agrarian communism. ~1.5-2 million dead (25% of population) via execution, starvation, overwork.
* Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam, Ethiopia, Venezuela: Similar patterns—initial redistribution, central planning, suppression of markets/dissent, economic decline, emigration, authoritarianism. Venezuela went from richest Latin American country per capita to hyperinflation and collapse under “21st-century socialism.”
The Black Book of Communism estimates 80-100 million deaths from democide, famine, and repression across implementations. These weren’t fringe experiments; they were the largest-scale attempts, backed by ideology from Marx’s writings.
Episode Transcript
Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. Today we are gonna be discussing an exciting topic, which is does communism make sense now? Specifically what we’re gonna be digging into here is, like, we are known as, I guess, far right-wing YouTubers or podcasters or intellectual influencers.
I don’t know, right? No. But, but people consider us far right-wing. Now, a lot of our fans consider us very centrist, so maybe, but I, I identify as, as right wing, so whatever, right? Like, I... The, the, the sane far right is where I think I’d put us, right? A- at least within, like, the tech right circles and stuff like that.
Which puts us in an interesting position vis-à-vis communism, ‘cause I’m not gonna come out here and just be like... We have said it in the past on the show very clearly that communism may work in a post-scarcity economy. And we have also a number of times gone into what it means when we say something like that, right?
Mm-hmm. Where, like, we are putting [00:01:00] extremely heavy caveats on this. When people have done UBI experiments and they have just handed people money, they have seen extremely bad outcomes. The most famous is the Sam Altman one where they gave people $1,000 every month for three years, and the people who had been given the money they, they had less money at the end of it, total money, than the people who had been given nothing in terms of, like, wealth increase, right?
They, they didn’t spend any more time with their kids. They didn’t have any more kids. They didn’t spend any more time in education. They really only spent more time in recreation. That’s it.
Simone Collins: And they paid down their debt a little, so that’s nice.
Malcolm Collins: Hmm. That doesn’t really mean anything. Oh, they
Simone Collins: visited the doctor a little more.
Malcolm Collins: It doesn’t really mean anything if on net they had less money.
Simone Collins: Yeah. So
Malcolm Collins: yes, they paid down their debt, but on net they had less money. Right. So, just a disaster, and we’ve seen this in communities that are offered UBI, right? Like Native American communities, for example, where we see them just completely [00:02:00] dissolve in terms of productivity, in terms of drug addiction, in terms of alcohol addiction the moment they get on something that is the equivalent of, like, UBI or, like, local communism or something like that.
And so then the question is okay, How do we eh, th- that, that all being the case, like also clearly AI is gonna disrupt what the economy means, right? And, and, and it may not happen this generation, right? It may not happen, ... Well, it’s probably gonna happen in our lifetimes, if I’m gonna be honest.
Like, if we look at- Yeah ... the speed of AI in relation to automated workers e- even, even for physical labor from what we’re sort of seeing behind the scenes, that’s developing a lot faster than people realize. And that we may be replacing people in a lot more fields a lot faster than people think.
And so then the question is, is okay, well if that happens, then what does the economy mean? How do you have a [00:03:00] functional economy with struggle and some form of scarcity so people don’t go crazy without what we’ve come to understand as, like, market labor, right? And so to explore this subject, I want to focus on a few areas.
I want to focus on, like, underlying how does capitalism help people? Examine the individual structures within capitalism that lead to the net outcome of positive human results. And see how those can be potentially mimicked in a post traditionally capitalist economy.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: But then secondarily the big question we have is Okay, how does communism often fail, and how could AI, or even could AI realistically prevent these failure scenarios?
Simone Collins: Mm.
Malcolm Collins: So, classic failure scenario in communism that I’ll sort of walk people through why, why communism almost always [00:04:00] fails. Not almost always. It, it literally always fails above certain sizes. Communism works in small government stuff, like it works with some of the kibbutzim. It works with families.
Every family is communist. W- w- sorry, people don’t understand what I mean by that. Like it’s from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs, right? Like my baby doesn’t work, right? And I can’t produce milk for them, right? You know, the person who can produce milk produces the milk.
The, the, the, the baby and the kids are not expected to bring in an income at this stage, right? You know, we, but we, we still support them. The types of jobs and roles that each of us take on are the types of jobs and role that we’re best at, both due to our educational background, proficiencies, and yes, gender.
So we live in a communist structure already. We live in a communist utopia already, it’s just a very small one. But the question is, is why does it break down at a societal level? We’ve written extensively on this, so I’ll keep it pretty short. The key reason is [00:05:00] is when you are creating a larger communist structure, you need to centralize power in a way that rewards bad actors.
And a lot of people don’t s- s- they’re like, “Oh, it’s that people aren’t motivated when they just get money from the state,” or something like that. Or that you can’t do advanced things in a communist system, and that’s not true. Like, that, that’s actually, like, factually untrue. Like, the one thing the Soviet Union was actually pretty good at was science.
Like, they were beating us soundly in the space race for quite a long period of the space race. They had many excellent, excellent scientists. Yes, because of government bureaucracy and the way sort of power gets captured in communist systems, they also ended up making catastrophically stupid scientific blunders that killed hundreds of millions of people.
The Chinese did this as well. This is typically in fields like biology and, and stuff like this. But in, in physics, they [00:06:00] did pretty well. So no, it’s, it, it’s actually not that people are just unmotivated in these systems. Highly motivated, highly conscientious people are typically equally or, if not, even more motivated in communist ecosystems.
Where communist ecosystems really break down is for less competent fields. The, the average line worker and stuff like that. Because at this point, you don’t wanna do those jobs. Nobody wants to do those jobs. People often end up doing them at the point of a gun barrel and maliciously poorly. It’s, it’s the average desk worker job.
It’s not the, “I got my best job I could have ever gotten because I’m literally one of the best people in the country at doing said job.” Like, “I’m a gun nut, and now I get to spend all of my day coming up with gun designs, and now we have the AK-47.” Right? You know, “I’m a, a nuke nut.” Right? “I’m really interested in cutting edge nuclear technology, and now we have a, a Soviet atomic bomb.”
Right? By the way, like, to put in [00:07:00] context how impressive that is, Iran still can’t make an at- now a- admittedly, like, everyone’s mad at them, but, like, the, the Soviet Union was doing this stuff, like, over half a century ago, right, at this point. So Communism can actually motivate the very best to do the very best.
One of the problems you have with Soviet science, sorry if I’m getting on a sidetrack here but they, like, really screwed up their tank production, for example simply because of, like, government politics that ended up prioritizing one idiot’s designs over the guy who was actually more competent because Soviet systems are not always good at finding the most competent person.
Huh ... capitalist systems also struggle sometimes to find the most competent person, but generally- True
Simone Collins: story ...
Malcolm Collins: like, if the government turned me away in a capitalist system, I could presumably go and build my own company separately off of my ideas. It doesn’t work that way, especially not in a country like the United States.
Like, I go off [00:08:00] and I wanna build my own tank and because somebody else has, like, government crony contract, they, they still get the government crony contract because they’re at Boeing and they’ll, they’ll kill you or something. You know, that’s, that’s the way this works. But again, the, the, the point I’m making here is yes, Sovietism leads to catastrophic inefficiencies but you can get those within at least what we call capitalist ecosystems as well, right?
Mm-hmm. So now back to what the real problem of communism is So when you’re going down a communist path, you essentially have two strategies that you can attempt. You can say, “We’re gonna centralize all the power into one bureaucracy and this single bureaucracy is going to manage all forms of the economy and everything like that.”
And everybody knows, like, generally this doesn’t seem to really work for a number of reasons tied to, like, inefficiency, but we’ll put those reasons aside in a bucket for now. So strategy [00:09:00] number one, centralize everything. Essentially you’re creating a country that’s ruled by a single monopolistic company.
That is, that is functionally what, what that form of communism is. Which is why I always say that the end state of communism and the end state of extreme libertarianism are the same.
Simone Collins: Well, and I mean, a, a big part of this that tends to create huge, huge problems is when you are creating one, when you’re consolidating everything, you’re also abolishing private property and markets, and that requires- Well,
Malcolm Collins: and then people don’t have the, the same reason to invest in their continued property.
Simone Collins: And it requires a lot of coercion. Like, pe- people don’t just, “Oh, sure. Yeah, take my house. That’s fine. I didn’t...
Malcolm Collins: That’s fine.” I mean, that’s, that’s generally the lower bloodshed and the lower death toll is on the redistribution part, though. Yeah,
Simone Collins: that’s the step one part. But I’m just saying, like, as a little starting point, there’s also some friction there.
Yeah, I
Malcolm Collins: mean, obviously it involves robbing people of their property and everything like that. [00:10:00] I get that. But that’s- Y- yeah ... usually the lower death... I mean, a lot of, obviously conservative commentators are gonna crash out about government redistribution, everything like that. I’m just pointing out that’s not actually where the, the vast majority of communist death tolls come from.
The vast majority of communist death tolls come from the inefficient management that happens after that.
Simone Collins: Yeah, so in terms of, At least there’s this one book that tries to give a full tally. It’s called The Black Book of Communism, and they estimate that there have been 80 to 100 million deaths From democide, famine, and repression across implementations.
I think famine’s the biggest killer.
Malcolm Collins: Right. So let’s, we’ll, we’ll talk about... okay, I’ll quickly explain why the things happen without going too deep into them. I can. One problem you have within a communist ecosystem is that an individual has no reason to invest in anything that they own, because they don’t own anything.
Yeah. So like, eh, our house requires a ton of effort and work to keep from falling apart. This is why if you go to [00:11:00] many communist countries, you don’t see tons of old houses, or you see houses in horrible disrepair, or, like, giant blocks in horrible disrepair. Because people didn’t have a reason to invest in the upkeep of their own property and the area around their property, right?
Like, it’s not just my house I want to be nice, it’s the region around my house, because that increases its value. And this is true of companies, this is true of everything. It’s, it’s a huge positive cycle that you get out of this. Mm-hmm. And the, the secondary bigger thing is, is inefficiency in the way things are operated.
And what people say, and I think incorrectly, is that you simply cannot manage, in a planned out format, an entire economy. And it is in attempting to do that that the Soviet systems begin to break down and the communist systems begin to break down in ways that lead to these famines and stuff like that.
But when we look at the actual causes of most of the famines, it isn’t actually due to problems in inefficient management. It’s, [00:12:00] it’s due to explicitly bad policy like killing all the birds in China that were eating the pests on the crop. They were mad that they sometimes ate the crops, and then they had giant pests, and then a bunch of people died because the way that they were measuring food is they would go to a town and they’d basically tell the person running the town, “Well, if you can’t show me X amount of food, you’re gonna be removed from your position,” right?
So now they’re like, “Oh yeah, we’ve got that amount of food,” right? And then they go to the people and they go, “Hey, the military works for me. You give all your food for export.” Now they don’t have any food left, because they were just pretending that they had X amount of food. But they wanted to keep their position, and they had the guns, so they were in a position to do this.
Because if they don’t do this, then they’re put in a... Now this is all a problem of organization. Like, all of these individual problems could be solved if you had an intelligent and conscientious person going through the system and attempting to address every one of these problems. What we really need to get to is why that doesn’t happen, why these problems never get [00:13:00] cau- solved, why bad ideas get pushed down, and we need to say, “Can AI prevent this?”
Simone Collins: Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: So, thoughts before I go further, Simone?
Simone Collins: I mean, I, I think you’re focusing a lot on the pure governance problems, but there’s more to it than just that, and so it’s also important to address those other short, shortfalls.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. What... I’m, I’m actually claiming there are not, actually. The problems that are not governance problems are not that big in communism.
So what do you think they are?
Simone Collins: That we discount the extent to which markets are like an organism or ecosystem that, that is able to manage huge amounts of information in a very responsive, distributed, natural way. And that when you try to have a human-run mostly blind government system run it, you don’t get the data you need.
Like, planners don’t have enough information- So I- ... about relative stares- scarcity and cost of things ...
Malcolm Collins: fundamentally disagree with your thesis here. There are [00:14:00] ways within a communist system, without-
Simone Collins: yeah, and the Soviet, like, there’s the Soviet OGAS system that they, they tried to create this nationwide information network to, to better manage this, but they couldn’t.
Like, just getting the information inputs in a pre-AI age was just not feasible. And they had to plan-
Malcolm Collins: No, the point I’m making is it isn’t just unfeasible. They just did it in bad ways. You can create pseudo-capitalistic systems in a communist empire that can measure supply and demand and react to supply and demand with rewards.
I mean, you are creating essentially capitalism with extra steps. But the idea of having distributive information networks that can recognize scarcity and demand is not something that is out of completely impossible in a communist system. The point I’m making here is that if you actually look, and I know from, like, a [00:15:00] capitalist perspective, the great machine, and people have talked about, like, capitalism as the first AI, right?
And in a way, capitalism is kind of the first AI, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: But the, the capitalist machine or the AI that’s created by the giant capitalistic network is not something that it is completely impossible to reverse engineer. And the reason I say this is that when we look at the failures of communist systems demonstrably, they are not due to failures of centralized control.
They are due to specific policy failures
Simone Collins: I wouldn’t say it’s just policy failures, too. I think that the fundamental system whereby, again, in a pre-AI age, communism comes to exist, which is this process of like a revolution to socialism to then communism, is doomed [00:16:00] to fail, right? Because you have this revolutionary fur- fervor, and then you have the purge where like a bunch of like people lose their property, and there’s the kulaks.
Mm. And then you get shortages, and then you have the famine, and then you have the backlash to that, the blame. “We have to, we have to handle this. Oh, it’s, it’s capitalism. It’s all these other things.” And then that means we have to implement more controls, and then that leads to corrupt and black markets, and then that leads to reform or collapse.
And it’s just, like things... It’s, it’s an inherently unstable system the way you have to stumble into cap- or to communism now. And here’s my fundamental thesis when it comes to communism and AI and how it’s going to play out and why it’s going to work, and why many of the fundamental things that lead to this instability aren’t going to be a problem.
One of the key things being, I mean, I know you’re talking about like human-led governance being really stupid, and AGI can sort of in a hand-wavy way fix [00:17:00] that, and the right AGI can. I think the other thing is that communism is often a problem because a bunch of corrupt, power-hungry people are like scrambling for the governing power and for the resources of like the workers and all their possessions, right?
Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm.
Simone Collins: But what, what happens when you have a bunch of people who don’t work and don’t own anything? Like no one’s gonna fight over them. No one wants them. And what I think might happen is that a large- a largely orphaned population, the l- the bottom part of the K-shaped economy, is going to be left high and dry by governments that falter, both due to like weird AI disruption, but also due to demographic collapse, and then also just left behind by the rich people who go off to their like techno-futurism.
That’s an interesting
Malcolm Collins: thesis, but I’m gonna push back on this.
Simone Collins: Let me finish with my thing then, and then you’ll push back. And then basically I think that some, some of the people who feel bad morally about leaving [00:18:00] behind everyone else are gonna send down some of their AGI gods to just create little communist communities for the people who’ve been left behind, and then those people will be taken care of by mother AI that will handle all their stuff for them.
So you don’t have anyone having their property taken away. You don’t have anyone, you know, being like accused of corruption or anything. You basically just have AI taking care of those who are left behind. Why is this wrong?
Malcolm Collins: So, I, I will get to that in a second. You might get that. Like, that is a possible good scenario.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: But the reason why I think that’s wrong is because I fundamentally disagree with you about the first part. The first part is, is communism, and I, I, I keep trying to come back to this because it’s actually central to understand why AI will likely fail even within a communist system, right? Like, why- AI would break communism is that communism doesn’t fail because [00:19:00] of it, it, it prevents competent people from working, or it doesn’t motivate people enough, or it’s bad at determining on-the-ground risks because capitalism just works as this brilliant machine that can measure things about economic states that communism could never measure.
And the evidence I used for that is, again, the failures and the successes we had under communism. Communism achieved some things that were enormously successful in terms of scientific progress, industrial development, et cetera. But it also obviously super high des- I’m not ... But what I’m saying is it’s to just be like communism didn’t function at all is, is factually incorrect.
And to say that within a communist ecosystem like let’s look at a capitalist ecosystem, right? If you go to a factory what type of person do you want running the factory, right? The type of person you want running the factory is gonna be the most competent person to run the factory, who has the support of the, the workers and can push them to work [00:20:00] their hardest.
In a communist system, what type of person do you want to run the factory? It, it’s the same type of person, right? The people who end up in the lower level management positions in communist and capitalist systems at least aspirationally in how these systems could, should be structured, are the same types of people.
Like you don’t have this, ... A- and it’s also communist systems don’t send food to the wrong place you know, malevolently or something like that. When we talk about communist systems failing at determining what, like where economic needs need to go, right? The, in the, in the way a capitalist system would.
The biggest failures are virtually never because the, the system wasn’t good at monitoring things. They are again, when I was talking about like the, the wheat famine, right? It was, it was a twofold failure. It was a failure of the, the [00:21:00] way that they were measuring, like how much wheat each region had, was a very bad way to be measuring each, how much wheat each region had, that led to adverse incentives, which led to them sending wheat to locations that didn’t need wheat from locations that did need wheat.
A- and they created a pest problem because they couldn’t tell people above them that they were wrong, right? Now note, in a capitalist system, you might not be able to tell your boss that they’re wrong, right? Like it let’s consider Ubisoft or something like that. I might- Mm-hmm ... even in a capitalist system not be able to tell my boss you make a, a, a video game about a, a Black guy in Japan going around murdering people.
It’s probably gonna cause problems, and a lot of people are going to be very upset by that.” And then I get fired, right? But within a capitalist system, the wider capitalist ecosystem actually punishes that person, not because of an issue of supply and demand. In a communist system, you’d presumably want to punish the person as well, [00:22:00] if the goal of the company was entertainment and not spreading the ideology.
But in a communist system, it’s often spreading ideology, so they, they probably wouldn’t be punished in the same way. But you, you understand what I mean. Like, suppose it’s something other than a game company and I’m actually like, “Oh, the way you’re doing this is functionally bad and going to lead to a bad product.”
Communist ecosystems should be determining, oh, this is a bad product. And there’s functionally ways that they can determine, oh, this is a product that people don’t like. Mm ... but so now the question is, is why do these systems fail in communism, right? Like, why do the people in the positions that would be equivalent to, like, running Ubisoft in a communist system not end up getting replaced or not end up getting replaced in the way that they should get replaced?
And it’s because, going back to what I was saying originally, communist systems fall into two broad categories. One is they function like a giant monopoly. Like, the entire government is one giant ultra libertarian monopoly where one company town has taken over everything and houses everyone and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Yeah ... very dystopian, whatever. But the thing is, is the moment I say that, [00:23:00] every communist is gonna say “Well, that’s not the way I wanna do communism.” You know, they wanna go in and do- Yeah ... anarcho-communism. They wanna do syndicalism. They wanna do basically they wanna have independently operating small communist groups.
Which extremely doesn’t work. The reason it doesn’t work is because it leaves a power vacuum. This is also why, like, extreme forms of libertarianism don’t work and everything like that. So suppose I try to set up this anarcho-communist system or even a completely syndicalist system, right, where, like, everything is, is totally decentralized.
Anybody who decides to act as a bad actor and begin to aggressively and subversively acquiring both support and resources can exert power on anyone who’s playing by the rules. And this is, like, a pro- like, in the Molyneux debate when I was trying to figure out how he thought that his weird libertarian utopia would work this is something that, like, he seemed to [00:24:00] fundamentally not understand.
He’s like, “No, everyone will rise up against a bad actor as soon as a bad actor starts accumulating power.” And I’m like, “I’m sorry, like, we have history to look at. We know that doesn’t happen,” right? Like, bad actors are actually very good at accumulating power. And and then they, they build an army, and the army can go to the person next to them.
This is true even outside of, even without a military, right? So this, this came when I was talking, like, extreme forms of libertarianism with Steven Molyneux. I was like, how do you get something like a chip fab, right? That costs- Yeah ... hundreds of billions of dollars to make?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Like- Years of a- ... well-
investment with no payout, et cetera.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. The, the... and there might be no payout. And he’s like, “Well, I guess we could get, like, hundreds of millions of workers to form, like, a cooperative to invest everything into this.” And then it’s like, okay, then who’s operating the cooperative, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: And they’re like, “Well, then we would have, like, some form of [00:25:00] democracy.”
And I’m like, okay, so as soon as somebody gains power within this giant fabricator state, right? That’s basically, it’s a state created to run a fabricator. Why would they not attempt to create systems that prevent them from being removed from power? Yeah. And the answer is, of course, well, everyone would rise up against them if they did something like this.
In the same way that he was like, well, he’s like, “Even if they got away with it, even if they accomplish all of this, then people wouldn’t buy their product because they’d see that they’re a bad actor.” Yeah. And I’m like, bro, you have a product in your pocket that was probably made by slaves. Like, you know that’s not true.
You know that people-
Simone Collins: Or eating food that is, or what, any, any mixture of things. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So what ends up happening, because the, the, the wider point I’m making here, here, here is customers don’t really punish bad actors. You, as a watcher of this show, likely barely punish bad actors. Even, even when [00:26:00] you’re...
I mean, maybe video games have finally gotten punished because they screwed over gamers for so long. But in the vast majority of cases bad actors don’t actually end up getting pub- punished that much by public sentiment. You know, even, even when they do something completely insane, it’s like their stock will fall like 5%.
It’s like, oh, no, you know. I mean, bad day to be the CEO ‘cause it’s like billions of dollars, but- You know, in, in the grand scheme of, like, society, it doesn’t matter. So the problem is with the anarchist and all of these power distributed systems is whenever somebody says, “I’m not gonna play by your distributed power rules, I’m just gonna accumulate all the power for myself,” they end up growing in influence.
And functionally, that’s what happens with most communist governments, is they start with a bunch of people saying like, “Let’s genuinely try to make this work.” Mm-hmm. And then some people begin to gain positions of power, and they’re like, “What if instead of genuinely trying to get this to work, I [00:27:00] use the apparatus of the state to consolidate power around me?”
Now, it’s very hard if you are a faction. So let’s suppose large communist country, two factions come to power with a legitimate government, right? Like, I’m not even talking about just, like, the warlords because you never even get to a stage where you have, like, pure autonomous regions for very long in these sort of libertarian communist fantasies because they immediately devolve.
People immediately consolidate power, I mean, within, like, a month of it entering any sort of state like that. But so I’ll function- focus on it on the way it actually typically happens. You have a bunch of often sometimes bleeding-hearted idiot leftists in a, in a room, haven’t really operated anything before, don’t really know what they’re doing, but may have positive intentions for the state.
And then you have the guy who comes in the room, your Stalin or whatever, right? Who’s like Uh-huh. Well, let’s try to be a bit more efficient [00:28:00] about this. I’m gonna talk with my friends in the military, and I tell them, “Hey, like, these guys aren’t really doing things the right way. And, you know, I think you, the heads of the military, deserve a bit higher standard of living than everyone else, don’t you think?
I mean, you’re controlling... You, you, you work so hard compared to everyone else.” And you begin to, instead of trying to distribute wealth and resources equally in the society, you begin to distribute wealth and resources in a way that maintains your power within the society, your power hierarchy within the society.
But
Simone Collins: you’re still, this is all with the supposition that this is humans running and everything and calling the shots.
Malcolm Collins: Right. I’m gonna get to the point. Okay. Because with AI, it’s the same problem, right? Which is... I’ll get to that in just a second, right?
Simone Collins: Okay, okay.
Malcolm Collins: But you need to understand why it fails with humans to understand why it would likely fail with AI.
So essentially, everyone who is [00:29:00] a bad actor, because they’re saying instead of taking all of the resources they can create and distributing them as much as they can, they take as resources they create, they distribute 20% and they take 80% to continue consolidating their position. So one, this leads to a ton of waste in the system in terms of the wealth that the people at the top are living, et cetera.
But two it leads to all the way down within the power hierarchy bad actors ending up in the highest level power positions, because it’s basically dictator to dictator to dictator to dictator all the way down, the people with, with those sorts of mindsets. And so you get this enormous corruption.
Because when I’m thinking about you know, do I wanna tell my boss that this planning has to kill all the birds is a dumb idea I’m not actually thinking about is this going to help my sub-state the most, right? Like if my region or the people or the farmers. I’m thinking about is this gonna help me consolidate power within [00:30:00] my position with the broader hierarchy, right?
The problem with AI is AI fundamentally doesn’t really change this. So, let’s assume that you create a truly post-scarcity sys- system which is essentially what Simone is positioning with her communist ecosystem. So what she’s essentially saying, and I don’t know if I, I, I don’t disagree with this point, that if you could create true super abundance the, the, the people who are either competent or corrupt enough to end up in the positions of power have so much wealth and abundance that the, the coins that fall off their plates feel like ultimate luxury to the people that they’re falling in, into the trough.
Well,
Simone Collins: it’s not, no. There’s additional motivation. Th- they, with AI, they could have the ability to create broadly from their perspective, autonomous AI-run communities that feed [00:31:00] and house people. Like a, a new version of fiefdom. You know how like the way that a lot of versions of fiefdom worked was you had the lord who lived on the state, and one of the reasons why in these grand houses you had all these ridiculous roles where they were like essentially job programs.
You know, the underbutler and the footman and the, the, the various types of cooks and, and all these people. It was a jobs program, and then everyone in the village, you know, they, they had somewhere to live, and then the, it was this whole little economy. They could c- create presumably a bunch of these little things that are all run by AI that give people little things to do and keep people busy and feed people food, and it’s not just, oh, the, you know, they’re, they’re eating like food runoff or something.
It’s that th- it’s better to have people be able to show up at these places and, and get placed, get a house, get a job, you know, a job have something to do in their life, you know, become some kind of artisan craftsman or something and live their little [00:32:00] picturesque covet life than to, you know, die in large droves and look, look bad and, and a lot of people just don’t- Well,
Malcolm Collins: no, right, but this is, this is the fundamental logical error that you’re making here.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: And it actually comes from growing up in the urban monoculture that you’re making this error. Okay. Which is very fun, because I think you’ll see it the moment I point it out.
Simone Collins: Okay.
Malcolm Collins: When you look at the quality of life of people who are relying on our today version of the types of systems that you’re talking about between states the amount of money that goes into these systems is often not just disco related, but inversely correlated with the actual quality of life of the people living off of the systems.
Simone Collins: I think they’re gonna... No. This, you’re seeing the very first version of UBI that people, thanks to the experimentation being done now, right? They’re learning from it. They’re going to discover-
Malcolm Collins: No, they’re not learning
Simone Collins: from it ... Come on. Okay, like in The Matrix, right? They’re like, “Oh, well, we made the first version of the matrix where everyone just had everything, [00:33:00] and it really didn’t work.
And so we created this new version where everyone has a job and they’re miserable, and it’s perfect.” And they’re gonna figure that out with UBI, and they’re gonna realize the best thing to
Malcolm Collins: do- We have already seen proof they won’t So I’ll ex- I’ll give you proofs that they won’t, right?
Simone Collins: Okay, what’s
Malcolm Collins: the one example?
Right now, when I’m talking more broadly, if you look at, like, California’s homeless, they often live much worse lives than homeless in other areas, despite all the money going into that. Yeah, it’s, it’s egregious. And you’re like, “Oh, they’re trying to fix it. They’re trying to fix it,” right? And I’m pointing out to you, why are...
Because you gotta ask yourself, why are the lives of California’s homeless so much worse than other states when so much more money is going to them? And it’s because of the inefficient bureaucracy following the same sorts of failings that we see in communist systems. And so now what you’re gonna come and say is you’re gonna say, like, “Well, these AI tech lords, they won’t fall for these same types of errors.”
And I’m like, “Hmm, Simone, in the UBI study that Sam Altman did, do you remember how the team that did the study [00:34:00] framed the results to Sam Altman? Did we already see an instance of them, in the very first instance where we could be moving down a good pathway, immediately lie about and manipulate the results to hide that it didn’t work in a way that-
Simone Collins: No, but Malcolm, those systems are going to collapse.
Like, I’m not saying this is gonna happen soon, but it’s going to happen-
Malcolm Collins: What do you mean? That’s the craziest f*****g thing I’ve ever heard. How did, what do you mean they’re going to collapse? They can’t collapse. They’re AI tech moguls who presumably have near infinity money if you’re talking about in the future, right?
Like, you think because people are living bad lives in their communist, quote-unquote, “utopias” that they’re going to care? Right? Like, they, they don’t care. California, San Francisco doesn’t care about its homeless drug addicts who are walking, zonked out on the streets and sleep in the poo that’s all around the financial district, right?
Like, if you look at the quality of lives [00:35:00] of people who live next to super abundance today, the elites, like, your thesis is, oh, they will see their policies failing, and they will change their policies, when your lived reality is that the exact opposite is happening.
Simone Collins: Those aren’t their policies. They’re living within a legacy bureaucracy government system and society that they certainly wouldn’t design.
What I’m describing
Malcolm Collins: is- But Sam Altman’s study was his
Simone Collins: study ... from the ground up techno fiefdoms that will be created but like sort of nature reserves for p- for h- for the humans that get left
Malcolm Collins: behind. But, but Sam Altman’s study was his st- are you denying-
Simone Collins: It was, but what he was, what... So you have to look at the game that he is playing.
He needs to give people a narrative that makes them comfortable with what’s going on today. If you were to say to them, “Okay, well, step one, society completely collapses, millions of people die. Step two, we’re gonna create some, like, nature reserves where people will [00:36:00] live and have jobs instead of live these, like, isolated fantasy lives and, and, you know, going forward for, like, the, the people who are left behind.
Like, we’ll, we’ll give a good life to many of them. But we can’t do that until society collapses because we won’t have, like, the land rights and stuff, and we won’t be allowed to govern them. So, for now, because I don’t want you to, like, completely firebomb my house successfully this time, I’m going to tell you that I have done the research and I’m fully convinced that all I need to do is just give you a lot of money each month, and then you can just do whatever you want with it, and that will make you happy.”
And people are like, “Okay, good. Well, at least Sam Altman is eventually gonna make sure that I get $10,000 a month and it’s gonna be great, and I’m gonna get DoorDash everything and play video games for the rest of my life, and hopefully it’ll be fine.” Th- but- What, and
Malcolm Collins: I’m pointing
Simone Collins: out to you that we’ve already seen that-
he has no incentive to communicate anything other than UBI to people. C- can you imagine if Sam Altman came out and was like, “Okay, right. So we ran the experiment, we looked [00:37:00] at the data, and, you know, it looks like we actually shouldn’t give you money because it doesn’t actually make a difference”? That’s like, get a job, Al.
Speaker: don’t you get a job? If you’re so hungry, why don’t you get a job? Get a goddamn job, Al. You got a negative attitude.
That’s what’s stopping you. You gotta get your act together.
Simone Collins: No, what he could have done- No, he can’t do that ... and so
Malcolm Collins: there’s, there’s two worlds that we live in. One is the world that I positively live in, and the other is a world you posit we live in, okay? So in the world I posit we live in, Sam Altman doesn’t actually care about the fate of the vast majority of people.
He cares about promoting UBI like, it, this is what I assume, because it allows him to continue to consolidate power. Remember how I said bad actors don’t really care about the effects of what they’re doing, they only care about consolidating power? So in that world, he would do something like conduct a UBI study, then lie about the results to mollify people.
Now, [00:38:00] let’s assume world number two, Simone world. Simone world is Sam Altman conducts a study on UBI, but he really does want one day, Because you know what’s cheaper than giving everyone money? Autonomous drone swarms around your house, okay? But you think, okay, no, one day, a private islands, which, you know, he’ll have, right?
Yeah. But your plan is, no, no, no, no, no. We live in alternate world where he actually does want some sort of stable utopia for the, the, the masses, right? So if we live in this world, what would have happened is he would have conducted that study, and the results of the study would’ve said something like, “Oh Well, it turns out that a traditional, you know, sort of blanket UBI program doesn’t appear to be, d- doesn’t appear to work, so what we need to do is try some alternate type of UBI program.
Like, let’s try to innovate on this for a type of UBI that does work. That wouldn’t have freaked everyone out. That would have had most people looking at the results and being like, “Oh, this is interesting. You know, you’re [00:39:00] trying to find something. You found result number one.” Instead, you see the exact opposite, the immediate glazing over of any result or data point that doesn’t fit his stated agenda or proposed solution to the hellscape that he might be creating.
Simone Collins: Look, I just told you that I agree that he doesn’t have any incentive to tell the truth about his UBI experiment and that he- Well, he
Malcolm Collins: does. If, if his plan is... It’s only marginally harder for him to actually try to help people. It’s just that it’s completely irrelevant to him.
Simone Collins: I don’t think it is. So you can have someone who is incentivized to amass power, amass wealth, may do things even that skirt morality and law to do so, who still- feels genuine pain when presented with the plight of human suffering.
Exactly the point I’m making. Who would like to make it go [00:40:00] away. And once these people have the means to say, “Okay, AI assistant, please go build something where some of these people can live and make me feel better about this,” they will do it.
Malcolm Collins: Well, and the point I’m making is they can’t do it.
Simone Collins: Why can’t they?
Malcolm Collins: So if you look at, and, and this is the reason I was bringing up like social welfare programs in San Francisco and stuff like that. San Francisco is a city that is full of very intelligent tech workers who also vote.
Simone Collins: Yeah. But yeah, th- they’re stuck with the San Francisco residents who have all these NIMBY laws, and they’re stuck with all these policies.
I don’t think they believe in supporting- The bad policies- ... things like needle distribution and,
Malcolm Collins: you know. The bad policies that are implemented in San Francisco if, if you look at them, right, some of them come from the legacy residents. The vast majority come from the donors to the Democratic Party who [00:41:00] are tech moguls.
That’s where the money’s coming from that’s going into these political PACs. The problem is, is that when you go to said, let’s say, Democratic tech mogul, and I know this because I know these people from San Francisco, you know these people from San Francisco. You go to them and you say this policy of giving people fentanyl on the street, it’s making their lives harder.
This policy of putting homeless people in hotel is leading to externalities for residents,” and they’re just like, “Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, it’ll work next year.” You’re acting like they, th- and, and these people care. They, quote-unquote, care about the suffering of the poor. But they don’t
Simone Collins: care- I just, I’ve yet to encounter anyone who works in the tech world in San Francisco who approves of homeless management policy in the area.
Malcolm Collins: They still vote Democrat.
Simone Collins: Ditto with LA. Well, yeah. But that’s, that, those are due to very complex, like, social brainwashing- Oh ... systems of the Bay Area.
Malcolm Collins: This, this is what I’m talking [00:42:00] about. When you get somebody like A- Sam Altman in this sort of a position in power, right? Like suppose he accumulates all this power.
He’s Sam Altman, god king of a region, and he’s distributing money to the masses in the region. Let’s suppose that the way he’s distributing money is leading to the same sorts of externalities that we see among, like, Portland or San Francisco homeless right now, right? Like massive drug problems, the problems we see in Native American communities, you know, massive crash outs, lots of problem.
Okay, suppose that those are all the functional result of what they’re doing, okay? What, what Sam Altman is doing, right? And then you have us online YouTube warriors or something like that trying to get to Sam Altman to tell him, “Hey, none of these policies you’re operating are actually working.” Right?
Do you think that we would be able to get in his ear, or are the people who are going to be getting in his ear the most the people who are operating the [00:43:00] failed policies, who recommended the failed policies, and who have a vested interest in him not fully grokking how much these policies are not working?
Even if you add AI to the chain and he does something like asks AI, you know, “Are my policies working or not working?” You know that, like, AI is gonna gas him on this, right? AI right now will gas you on Democratic policies. If you ask AI something like you know, “Is X or Y Democratic policy around, like, poor people actually effective?”
When you look at, like, AIs on political charts, you know it’s gonna support these policies that we know functionally don’t work. So why would it not still do that when he’s in god king position and now has three layers of bureaucrats around him that prevent him from fully grokking how much his plan is failing?
Simone Collins: I have doubts about that. I just I have severe doubts about that. You can [00:44:00] look at, for example, coverage of the mayoral race in Los Angeles in California and see the level to whi- i- to which people are really, really fed up with the homeless policy in California, with the housing policy in California. I think there’s that that demonstrates that people aren’t necessarily ideologically locked into the system that you’re describing.
Beyond that, it is parasitoidal, this, this kind of approach to governance, this culture as well. It will kill the host, and the host will die. Demographic collapse is such that these things aren’t going to be supported much longer anyway. They’re going to collapse on their own, and I don’t think AI, in the time over, the time period over which these systems are going to collapse, AI is not yet going to reach the place, in my opinion, where it will be able to sweep in and deus ex machina style, like fix [00:45:00] it.
So I really think that these systems are going to fully crumble which is not the happier scenario. I’m, I, like, I don’t want this to ha- it, it, it’s bad. But these systems won’t be left. I, I do think that, that many people... When, when a communist utopia will be created, I think it will be in sovereign city state style, essentially human reserves that are created for the people who were left behind but who survived.
Malcolm Collins: What you need to make AI communist, like, like post-scarcity worlds work and not lead to the same problems we have with like homelessness and stuff like that in Democrat counties and the poor in Democrat counties doing much worse is them being operated by an extremely austere and dedicated ca- caste that is ideologically aligned at the level of [00:46:00] like religious fervor.
So if you had like let’s say techno-puritans end up taking over and, and, and like really dedicated techno-puritans were running everything, it could work. If you had a state with AI and somebody like the Dalai Lama, like the last Dalai Lama and the top levels of like the Tibetan, you know, that, that I’d like...
Look, I don’t love everything he did. I thought he was a bit foolish on a number of issues. But that could probably work, right? Because you need to be able to cast off if, if you personally are not interested either because you were raised this way or you have an extremist ideological commitment in power accumulation or luxury or anything like that outside of, for the purpose of some wider objective function you have on reality, If, if you have that, then you can use AI to create post-scarcity.
But I think without that being a person’s fundamental driver above all other drivers, [00:47:00] you cannot get true post-scarcity even with AI in sort of like how it reaches the masses
Simone Collins: I guess time will tell.
Malcolm Collins: Yep. Well, we’re gonna see. And we can hear in the comments what people think. But basically my th- thought is the next society we’re gonna have to transition into post demographic collapse and everything like that is one of, of, y- you know, religious fanaticism essentially.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
I, I mean, we can agree on that. That’s, I think- That’s, that’s more about demographic collapse than it is about artificial intelligence or communism. It has more to do with just- Yeah ... who’s going to continue to have a desire and an interest in reproducing in, in the face of n- demographic collapse, AI, and massive disruption.
Malcolm Collins: So what’s the story with dinner tonight?
Simone Collins: I have one batch of the pork leftover, and then after [00:48:00] that, or we... So you can either have that tonight or tomorrow night. What I could also do is just tomato soup and grilled cheese or tomato soup and quesadillas tonight if you prefer. Oh
Malcolm Collins: my God, quesadillas.
Your quesadillas are so good.
Simone Collins: That’s ‘cause they have MSG in them. That’s what I’ve
Malcolm Collins: been asking for. Is the batch, do you have from
Simone Collins: batch
Malcolm Collins: one or batch two?
Simone Collins: Batch two
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I’ll wait on that. I’ll do quesadillas and tomato soup.
Simone Collins: Yeah, batch two might be more tender since it’s leaner meat after just sitting for a couple of days loosening up.
You know what I mean?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that makes sense.
Simone Collins: Theoretically.
Malcolm Collins: So I’m very excited. The, the, the... what she’s talking about is slow-cooked pork belly that she’s gotten very good at making.
Simone Collins: Aw, that’s sweet
Malcolm Collins: of you ... and I am very excited for my que- oh, quesadillas, tomato soup, and fancy fries.
Simone Collins: No. A quesadilla’s your carb.
You get to choose one carb. Okay. Do you want tomato s- do you want tomato soup and curly fries?
Malcolm Collins: No, [00:49:00] quesadillas.
Simone Collins: Okay. You can have your curly fries with the leftover pork belly t- or, well, pork shoulder in this case tomorrow, yeah?
Malcolm Collins: You’re so amazing, Simone.
Simone Collins: Oh, I’m the worst, I know. Also there is not too far from us a, an arboretum that we haven’t gone to.
Do you wanna take the kids there tomorrow since-
Malcolm Collins: What’s an arboretum?
Simone Collins: It’s gardens. It’s, it’s a, it’s a garden. They have trails. Like, it’s just a different place for us to walk.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. It’s free. Sure. You know. Oh, wow, it is close.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm. Isn’t that crazy? Never been before. Free admission.
Malcolm Collins: That’s
Simone Collins: the whole thing
Malcolm Collins: Oh, no, that’s not what I thought it was.
What was it? Arboretum?
Simone Collins: Jenkins Arboretum and Gardens.
Malcolm Collins: Jenkins Arboretum and Gardens.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Oh.
Simone Collins: It’s really close. And
Malcolm Collins: it’s free to enter?
Simone Collins: Yeah, it’s free to enter always. They have like a little kid [00:50:00] play area. I feel like the kids would really enjoy it.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. If I’m making good progress on the VTuber thing, I wanna try to get the thing done before my call with Leaflet.
Simone Collins: I’ve just noticed that every weekend you wanna do something special. We can do this on a different weekend day, but if we go tomorrow, it will be the least crowded.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Okay, yeah, that makes sense. Let’s do it.
Simone Collins: Okay. I’m looking forward to it. I mean-
Malcolm Collins: I mean, you know tomorrow is Friday, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah, but we have the kids with us all day.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. And you’re sure we have the kids with us all day?
Simone Collins: I’ll confirm it right now, but yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. All right, love you. All right. I guess we’re going straight to dinner?
Simone Collins: That’s the plan. Yeah, we don’t have enough time to record another episode in like 10 minutes.
Malcolm Collins: Love you. I’ll get Professor Jane ready for tomorrow.
Simone Collins: Yay. ‘Cause I like the title card I created for that. Plus it’s trending. Stop thinking it’s not a big deal ‘
cause it-
Malcolm Collins: But yeah, you see we get the full VTuber exports now. [00:51:00]
Simone Collins: Yeah. It’s really cool. You gave yourself, like, blonde hair though. Are we-
Malcolm Collins: Why? Do you see me with brown hair? Is that what I’m...?
Simone Collins: Yes, you have brown hair. I don’t know what to tell you.
Malcolm Collins: I had blonde hair when I was a kid, and our kids have blonde hair, so.
Simone Collins: So you just internalize yourself as having blonde hair forever?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I think it looks more like me when I, when I put, make him with blonde hair.
Simone Collins: That’s so funny. Like, you just kind of anchored to yourself as a teen. I wonder, that, that kind of sticks to my, my feeling like everyone has a s- like a soul age, like an age of their personality, and yours is like 11, in a good way, and mine is like 62, in hopefully a good way.
And I think honestly I would be more comfortable seeing like a VTuber a- avatar of like a white-haired [00:52:00] woman or something than of anything that I looked like as a kid. So I wonder if when people make VTubers of themselves that they just key to whatever their soul age is. You know what I mean?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: You want me to kick us off with this one? You like to do your own kickoffs, so.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. I’ll do a kickoff with this one.
Simone Collins: Okay.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this Based Camp episode, Simone and Malcolm Collins dive into the harsh realities of aging alone through a Wall Street Journal article about Amy Kant, a 65-year-old single, childless woman facing health issues, estate planning struggles, and isolation. They explore the growing demographic of “solo agers,” the long-term consequences of choosing career and freedom over family, feminist regrets, and why so many women (and men) end up dying alone.
Topics include: the breakdown of intergenerational social contracts, business opportunities in elder care/power of attorney/estate planning/unclaimed assets, pronatalist perspectives, and real listener stories of regret. Malcolm also shares new rfab.ai features like the recipe generator and discusses building liable human services.
A raw, unfiltered look at demographic decline, life choices, and turning societal problems into opportunities.
Show Notes
Can two dark things cancel each other to create a rainbow?
* Dark thing: The job market is atrocious and about to get worse
* Dark thing: Millions of childless elderly people—and aged parents who moved away from and dissociated from their children—are headed into old age and death without support networks
* Rainbow? There are huge business and job opportunities
We can use a recent Wall Street Journal article, More Americans Are Aging Alone. One Woman Told Us What It’s Like, for inspiration!
(Not reading every paragraph)
“Amy Kant initially thought she should name a power of attorney about 10 years ago after caring for a dying friend. She still hasn’t appointed someone to do it.
The 65-year-old is single with no children, and bound up in that choice over who should make financial decisions on her behalf are other big questions that are often intensified when aging alone. How to handle eldercare? Estate planning? Where will she live in her later years?”
* Company opportunity? Power of attorney for isolated old people?
* Easy attorney job
* Many elder law and estate planning attorneys serve as POA agents (they charge both hourly and flat fees)
* You may not need to be an attorney: Some states recognize licensed/bonded “professional fiduciaries” who can be hired to act as your agent under POA, trustee, or similar roles
* You could also take the CPA route:
* Some planners recommend using a CPA, financial advisor, or daily money manager to handle money management and, in some cases, to serve as agent under a financial POA.
* Financial planners may not advertise as “POA companies,” but they can be named personally in the document
* Less relevant: Certain not‑for‑profit care management firms (staffed by nurses, social workers, and care managers) specifically market themselves as agents under POA for older adults without family.
* But these won’t be able to keep up with demand
* What percentage of Americans over 65 have savings sufficient to cover their costs in retirement?
* Federal Reserve data, summarized by several analyses, shows that around 51–62% of households headed by someone in their mid‑60s or older have money in retirement‑specific accounts (401(k), IRA, etc.). That means roughly 4 in 10 have no retirement account at all, though they may have Social Security, pensions, or other assets.
* A 2024 analysis of Federal Reserve survey data found only about 31% of Americans of all ages feel “on track” with retirement savings, implying that even among those who have savings, many believe it is not sufficient.
“Kant had long cherished the freedom that came with being single. She prided herself on doing headstands in yoga and walking 5 miles a day. But lately being single has felt like a struggle, and not just because of the weighty financial decisions hanging over her head. Back surgery and a heart valve replacement in the past few years have turned her condominium outside Boston into a recovery ward.”
“She spends most of her time at home these days recovering from heart surgery complications, with friends stopping by. She finds solace painting in a spare bedroom she turned into a studio, but knows she will eventually have to move to a smaller place that’s easier to get around in.”
* This isn’t just a problem for aging singles; it’s a problem for aging parents who move away from and stop supporting their kids
* There’s more of a social contract for kids to provide elder care for parents who provided childcare for their kids
* Though admittedly 18-20% of Millennials (people between 25-34 today) live with their parents, so those parents can likely expect care
“Kant is among the millions of Americans learning to navigate aging alone. Roughly 10% of the more than 125 million adults ages 50 and older in the U.S.—or at least 12.5 million people—are solo agers who live alone and have neither a spouse nor a child, according to an AARP analysis of census data. It’s a growing demographic hitting both genders, driven in part by climbing divorce rates among older Americans and a rising number of adult children becoming alienated from their parents.”
* Wow—and estate planners / financial advisors are super underwhelming and pretty low tech, so someone good with AI and navigating regulatory bureaucracies can lean up
“Kant didn’t set out with a master plan. In her 20s and 30s, she chose lower-paying nonprofit jobs to give priority to her art. She remembers how friends envied her freedom; while they were tied down with dinner duty, their kids’ homework, and college savings, Kant spent her evenings painting and didn’t think twice about going out on weeknights.”
* This is a really great example of how the Urban Monoculture lies to people and sells an unsustainable lifestyle
“She eventually earned her M.B.A. By her 40s, she was working as a fundraiser, maxing out traditional retirement account contributions to ensure her financial stability in later years.”
* What are the odds that she ultimately saved more money for retirement by getting an MBA?
“In her 40s she considered adoption but ultimately decided against it. Then in her 50s, after her own mother died, she went through a period of regret that she had decided against single motherhood.”
* Wonder why she did not adopt (pronatalist families do all the time + women in r/fencesitters mention it all the time)
* What percentage of childless elderly adults regret not having kids?
* An Australian study (often cited in media summaries) found that about one quarter of child‑free women later reported regretting the decision once they were past child‑bearing age and facing old age alone
“While Kant feels OK about her nest egg today, she’s worried it might shrink if the stock-market falls from its record high levels. Once she recuperates, she plans to return to part-time consulting to keep her mind active and feel productive.”
* This is another reason why Gen Z and Gen Alpha have trouble getting jobs
“When Kant first realized the importance of naming a power of attorney, she didn’t know whom to choose at the time, and put off the decision. She only recently identified the right friend for the role after her illnesses made clear she needed to act. Kant is planning to ask that friend soon.”
* SHE HAS NOT ASKED HER YET???
“A longtime college friend serves as her healthcare proxy, and Kant maintains a spreadsheet of friends to coordinate visits when she’s ill. Still, she understands the boundaries of a chosen family. Her friends have their own households to manage; some have already died. Kant also needs to draft a will and decide how to divide her assets.”
* SHE HAS NOT DRAFTED A WILL
“Kant has given herself a one-year deadline to complete her estate-planning documents. She is hoping she will have the mental energy needed to tackle such tasks once she is further along in her recovery.”
* Dying without a valid will is called dying “intestate.”
* When a single, childless person dies with a positive net worth but no will, their assets go through intestate probate and are distributed by state law to their next of kin (or, if none exist, to the state), not according to any informal wishes.
* STARTUP IDEA: Make this efficient and collect a fee
* The closest thing is “heir‑locator” / “finder” services and asset‑recovery firms that track down heirs to deceased people’s money (including cousins), often for a contingency fee. These operate alongside the standard unclaimed‑property system run by the states.
* When someone dies and assets go unclaimed or the owner cannot be located, banks and companies eventually turn those assets over to the state’s unclaimed‑property office
* Heirs can later claim them if they prove their relationship.
* You can search and claim for free via tools like The National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators (Unclaimed.org) and MissingMoney, or directly through each state’s unclaimed‑property portal.
* Some private “locator services” or “finders” proactively contact people and offer to help file claims for a cut of the recovery; federal guidance explicitly notes that these companies exist and charge a fee for using public data to match people with unclaimed funds.
* Many states regulate these finders (caps on fees, licensing/certification requirements); for example, Pennsylvania requires “finders” working with claimants to be certified by the Treasury, but this is easy for any competent founder to do.
“Back in her art studio, Kant processes how her life is set to shift in coming years through painting. She created a series about being alone but being part of a larger world. She also made a collection of autumn leaf portraits that explore aging, decay and the search for where we belong. “I’m thinking about what my legacy will be,” she said.”
* There is something deeply lonely about being the dead end of an unbroken chain of life that has lasted for thousands of years
* Homo sapiens have existed for roughly 300,000 years
* Life has existed on earth for over 3 billion years
* Talk about breaking a streak
Episode Transcript
Simone Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Malcolm. I’m excited to be speaking with you today ‘cause we’re bringing back our favorite series, Women Are Terrible.
Speaker: What heartbreak drivel. See how the men look at her with utter contempt. Daphne, we’re going home.
Women, know your limits.
Simone Collins: This time, we’re talking about an old woman who chose to eschew men and children and meaning, and now she’s going to face the prospect of dying alone.
Malcolm Collins: The- N- not just one. I also found a number of other transcripts from similar women-
Simone Collins: You did not.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, God ... that we can go across. And Simone goes through this, in her immediate thoughts, she comes to me and she goes, “Malcolm, I bet we can find a way to exploit this for money, and we can help our fans-” It’s
Simone Collins: worse than that.
I already got you 50 to $100 out of this.
Malcolm Collins: Wait, really? Yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah. We’ll get into it, so.
Malcolm Collins: Wait,
Simone Collins: what? I know, I know. Anyway, let’s dive into it. So you can interject when you want to. I’m gonna be reading excerpts [00:01:00] from a recent Wall Street Journal article titled, Most Americans Are Aging Alone, and One Woman Told Us What It’s Like.
And her name is Amy Kant. The article begins, “Amy Kant originally...” Or I should say Kant, like Immanuel Kant. “Amy Kant initially thought she would name a power of attorney about 10 years ago, after caring for a dying friend. She still hasn’t appointed someone to do it. The 65-year-old is single with no children, and bound up in that choice over who should make the financial decisions on her behalf o- over big questions that are often intensified when aging alone.
How to handle an elder care, estate planning. Where should she live in her later years?” So already, huge company opportunity.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ...
Simone Collins: if, if you’re an attorney, this is a super easy attorney job. There are mil- many like, like elder law, like literally they specialize in elder law and estate planning who also will serve as your power of attorney.
In fact, I think we know people who have lawyers as their power of attorney instead of like friends or [00:02:00] family. And they’re family members. This is your people who have family- And if
Malcolm Collins: you want, by the way, an AI to do legal stuff for you to handle like the simpler stuff, on rfab.ai we have a feature called a super search, which does multiple AI internet searches with different AI engines-
Simone Collins: Yeah
Malcolm Collins: or models-
Yeah ... that then counter-check the facts of the previous model to remove any hallucinations- Yeah ... for putting together a legal document or something like that. By the way, fun fact, new feature I added today, is a recipe feature. I’m
Simone Collins: so... Oh my God, it’s there? Can I check it now? Can I check it...
I’ll, I’ll check it after
Malcolm Collins: this- Yeah. We’ll, we’ll check it, we’ll check it at the end of the episode. But you’re like- Gosh ... excited
to
Simone Collins: show it to you. Okay. I’m excited. But also, you, you don’t have to be an attorney to do this. Some states recognize a licensed or bonded professional fiduciary who can be hired to act as your agent under power of attorney or trustee or similar roles.
So you don’t even necessarily need to be a lawyer. Though another really easy route, if you’re like, “Okay, I, I can make some easy money in here,” the tailwinds are good, as we say in the private equity [00:03:00] world. You could take the CPA route. Like, some, some certified financial planners will serve as power of, powers of attorney for their clients.
So they may not advertise themselves as power of attorney companies- Get to
Malcolm Collins: the sad women part. Our audience cares about that, and you can talk about how to make money at the end. This is
Simone Collins: true.
Malcolm Collins: We exploit old people later, we laugh at sad women first. Okay. Stick to the order of operations here, Simone.
Simone Collins: Back to this, this woman of, of age. “Kahn had long cherished the freedom that came with being single. She prided herself on doing headstands and yoga and walking five miles a day. But lately, being single has felt like a struggle, and not just because of the weighty financial decisions hanging over her head.
Back surgery,” I wonder if the headstands had something to do with that, “and a heart valve replacement in the past few years have turned her condominium outside Boston into a recovery ward. She spends most of her time at home these days recovering from heart surgery complications with friends stopping by.
She finds solace in [00:04:00] painting in a spare bedroom she turned into a studio, but knows she will eventually have to move to a smaller space that’s easier to get around in.” I wanna point out, by the way-
Malcolm Collins: That’s sad and terrifying ...
Simone Collins: it’s, it’s really sad and terrifying. And it’s also not just a problem for, like, aging singles, it’s a problem for aging parents who move away from and stop supporting their kids.
And I think this is a uniquely American phenomenon, and I, I think a, also a picture of really toxic culture, in that if you do not invest in your kids as adults, like you don’t provide them with childcare, you don’t provide them with support, you don’t really get involved in their life, you just sort of, “Okay, well now I’m just gonna go become an adolescent again and, like, travel the world and go have fun and, like, do my own thing,” they’re not necessarily going to feel like there’s some kind of social contract that means they need to show up for you when you hit old age.
This is why all the old people in America, or so many of them, get shoved into homes, ‘cause it’s like, well- Where were you when I needed you? Like, the whole way that communities used to work was you would [00:05:00] raise your kids, and then you would hit menopause as a woman, for example, and she is a woman in this case.
And one of the reasons people think women do hit menopause is that w- there’s a place in society for women who can no longer have their own kids, but instead who can be a supplemental parent to their, their children’s kids so that those children can focus on having more kids. Because it’s- Yeah
it’s really hard to both be pregnant and, you know, be raising a ton of kids, so having that support’s really there. So the, the social contract is you have your kids, you help your kids raise your kids, and then they help you live more comfortably when you can’t really do much of anything else. But now it’s not just these childless people, but also just parents.
They move away from their kids. They don’t take care of their kids. Though admittedly, like 18 to 20% of millennials, like, or at least people between 25 and 34 today, so like proper adults, still live with their parents. So maybe those parents could expect care, but like all the other ones, like not really.
I’ll go back to the article. “Conte is among the millions of [00:06:00] Americans n- learning to navigate aging alone. Roughly 10% of the more than 125 million adults ages 50 and older in the US, or at least 12.5 million people, are solo agers who live alone and have neither a spouse nor a child, according to an AARP analysis of census data.
This is a growing demographic hitting both genders, driven in part by climbing divorce rates among older Americans and a rising number of adult children becoming alienated from their parents,” to my point. My gosh, though, like also estate planners and financial advisors are incredibly underwhelming in like what they provide.
Like, th- they’re not very tech-enabled. They’re pretty disorganized. You kind of have to nudge them for everything. We’ve, we’ve like encountered a bunch throughout a, a, various things. They’re not very good. Like, people can
Malcolm Collins: just- So can, like use a super search on RFAB and it’ll do a better job.
Simone Collins: Actually, though, like yeah, just like use AI to superpower your [00:07:00] business.
RFAB has the best tools. And then, like advertise well. Make this really, like... And, and, and, and, and, and for people just searching like, “How do I find a power of attorney?” Like, it, I don’t... I think people can clean up. Anyway, back to the article.
Malcolm Collins: You still need a human for power of attorney, which is where we or you come in in terms of cleaning it
Simone Collins: up.
That’s... Well, and this is my big thesis with AI, is that a huge portion of jobs is going to be li-
Octavian Collins: I filled it up, Mommy, at the tippy top.
Simone Collins: Thank you very much, my friend.
Octavian Collins: Yeah. But I’ll give you... But, but, but getting that all the way at the tippy top for you costed to use all of it, so I’m sorry.
Simone Collins: Then we’ll have to buy more at Tractor Supply.
Octavian Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Oh, no. We’ll have to go back to Tractor Supply. Love you.
One of my big theses with AI is that one of the big human jobs is going to be liable human. Like, there has to be a, a human- Mm-hmm ... who is going to be legally at fault for something or legally responsible
Malcolm Collins: for something. Should we create a website called Liable Human just for like-
Simone Collins: Oh my God, just like, it’s, it’s like Upwork, [00:08:00] but just for liability?
Malcolm Collins: For liability, yeah. Upwork for liability with AI on your- I
Simone Collins: kind of love this. Liablehuman.com. We gotta look this up. We gotta look this up. Okay. But-
Malcolm Collins: I like this idea ...
Simone Collins: but
Malcolm Collins: actually,
Simone Collins: though, is that like-
Malcolm Collins: Just liable human. Are you an AI... And we’ll, we’ll advertise it all to AIs. Are you an AI that needs a human to be your through fair?
I’ll be your liable human.
Simone Collins: Oh my God, yeah, get your liable human here. Oh my God. And we can, yeah, we can like list like, well, do you need a liable doctor? Do you need a liable driver? We’re
Malcolm Collins: not talking enough about sad women progressives for re-
Simone Collins: regretful choices. Back to the article. Back to the article.
“Kant didn’t set out with a master plan. In her 20s and 30s, she chose lower paying nonprofit jobs to give priority to her art. She remembers how friends envied her freedom. While they were tied down with dinner duty, their kids’ homework, and college savings, Kant spent her evenings painting and didn’t anything twice about going out on weeknights.”
And this is such a great example of how the urban monoculture lies [00:09:00] to people and sells an unsustainable lifestyle. I’ll continue. “She eventually earned her MBAs. By her 40s, she was working as a fundraiser, maxing out traditional retirement account contributions to ensure her financial stability in later years.”
Though I have to wonder, like, if she didn’t get an MBA, would she have s- ultimately saved more money? Like, the amount of student debt people get just by living on autopilot, which i- imagine she, like, she did, right? She just sort of did what felt good or like put things off. She’s put off getting a power of attorney for 10 years.
Malcolm Collins: So- By the way, so liablehuman.com is free.
Simone Collins: We’re buying it.
Malcolm Collins: Yes.
Simone Collins: Oh my gosh, we’re buying it. We’re buying it. This could be it, Malcolm. This will be we finally make our money ... give that to
Malcolm Collins: me as a vibe coding task and I can vibe code a, a website because you gave up on trying to do vibe code a website.
Simone Collins: Yeah, I, I suck at it. I suck at it. Yeah, I c- I’ll be the liable human and you do the-
Malcolm Collins: And I’ll do the vibe coding?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. But go back to the sad women. That’s what they’re here for
Simone Collins: In her 40s, [00:10:00] she considered adoption, but ultimately decided against it. Then, in her 50s, after her own mother died, she went through a period of regret that she’d decided against single motherhood.
And I, I really wonder why she did not adopt because one, w- we in our paid only weekend episodes did a, a, like an overview of our fence sitters- Mm-hmm ... this subreddit on Reddit where people who are ambivalent about becoming parents post. And two of, like, the four top all-time posts that we read were written by women who were like, “Oh, I just plan on adopting when I’m retired, ‘cause then I’ve done all my fun things and I can then raise a kid without bringing a new person into the world.”
So why aren’t they doing it? Like, are they just, is this all performative? Like, they, they never actually wanna take care of
Malcolm Collins: someone. Well, I think a lot of it is because they don’t actually wanna do kids. They want to imagine w- like, a world where, like, maybe they do kids, right? Yeah. One day, right? ‘
Simone Collins: Cause I swear to you, the only families I see actually adopting people are these pronatalist [00:11:00] families that, like, have four of their own kids already.
It’s crazy. It is. And it’s not that, like, oh, they have four kids and then they hit some fertility window and they can’t have kids anymore. It’s often in between kids that they are having themself biologically. Yeah. Like, they’ll have three kids, then two adopted, and then another that’s theirs. Like, the... Oh, like, I don’t know what’s going on.
Anyway, it’s very odd. But in terms of childless adults who regret having kids, one Australian study that’s often cited when people talk about this found that one quarter of childfree women later reported regretting the decision once they were past childbearing age and facing old age alone. One in four.
Malcolm Collins: So, o- o- one in four regretted raising children?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Or regretted- No, re- no, no, no. Regretted not having children. Not
Malcolm Collins: having children.
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins: Now, back to the article. “While Khan feels okay about her nest egg today, she’s worried it might shrink if the stock market falls from its record high levels.
Once she recuperates,
Malcolm Collins: she plans-” By the way, the stock market is at record [00:12:00] high levels right now for people who are like, “IRAM’s gonna ruin the economy, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.” Record high stock market.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, and it’s, I, it’s only gonna go up. I, I, I do believe what... Remember that AI 2027 report that,
Malcolm Collins: You put more money on the market when the war started, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah, ‘cause it went down.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, really.
Simone Collins: I was like, “Sale.” Yeah, the, and I think with AI, the stock market’s just gonna keep going up and up for a while. That’s what the AI 2027 report-
Malcolm Collins: That’s
Simone Collins: what I think, yeah ... initially projected. Like, it’s... And yes, it’s all gonna be concentrated in this very small number of companies, but that’s, that’s the future, people.
Welcome to that anyway, she pl- once she recuperates, she plans to return to part-time consulting to keep her mind active and feel productive. So couple things there. One, this is why so many Gen Z and Gen Alpha people graduating from college or graduating from high school can’t get jobs, because all of these boomers are re-entering the [00:13:00] job force because they’re not...
They’re choosing to not take care of grandkids or support their, their kids. Mm-hmm. Or they’re childless, and they either wanna stay active, or they need the money ‘cause they don’t have enough saved.
Malcolm Collins: And our parents fall into this category, right? Like, we have, One of the fans of the show basically acts like a grandparent to our kids, and our parents- Yeah,
Simone Collins: meanwhile our parents...
Malcolm Collins: Do nothing. Yeah. Not, not, except, like, come by, and we’re like, “Yeah, great, you’re still alive.”
Simone Collins: Swoop in. Swoop in. Yeah, whereas one, like, regularly-
Malcolm Collins: I don’t know. I don’t know if your account is schadenfreude enough. Do, do you wanna go over, so I’ve got someone here like, “I regret belittling men.
At 63, I’ve ended up alone.”
Simone Collins: Oh. Yeah, we can take a break with yours, or we can finish mine and then read yours.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, finish yours, then I’ll go over it. Yeah.
Simone Collins: All right. When Kant realized the importance of naming a power of attorney, she didn’t know whom to choose at the time and put off the decision. She only recently identified [00:14:00] the right friend for the role after her illnesses made clear she needed to act.
Kant is planning to ask that friend soon. Kant, what are you doing?
Malcolm Collins: You’re writing an article about it before acting on it. Some people
Simone Collins: just- Seriously. It, it’s, it’s, it’s disturbing. Anyway. A longtime college friend serves as her healthcare proxy, and Kant maintains a spreadsheet of friends to coordinate visits when she’s ill.
Still, she understands the boundaries of a chosen family. She, her friends have their own households to manage. Some have already died. Kant also needs to draft a will and decide how to divide her assets. Kant has given herself a one-year deadline to complete her estate planning documents.
She is hoping she has the mental energy required, needed to tackle such tasks once she’s further along in her recovery. She, she is in her 60s and she doesn’t have a will. Like, we, we had our first will together when we were in our late 20s.
Malcolm Collins: You’re asking us for advice, I guess. Yeah, like.
Simone Collins: Like, I think we were, we lived in Palo Alto when we first made a will together.
This is [00:15:00] cra- ... Like, part of, I think, not getting married is, is part of a failure to launch. Like, this is a sign of someone who really can’t get their life together, which is sad. But here’s- Like, how you, how you, how you- ... here’s, here’s where, here’s where your free money showed up, by the way. Oh, yeah. So here’s another business opportunity ‘cause come on, Malcolm, money.
So if you die without a valid will, that’s called dying in intestate, interstate, I don’t know. I don’t know what, what em- emphasis on the syllable to, to make, but you, you die intestate, intestate. When a single childless person dies with a positive net worth but no will, their assets go through intestate probate, and they are distributed by state law to their next of kin.
And if, if there is no one to be found, then it just goes to the state. It’s not according to any informal wishes. They can’t be like, “Oh,” like on their deathbed, like, “You can have my boom box.” Yeah. So startup idea. Yeah. Just make it really efficient to collect a fee. And here’s the thing, like, states publish [00:16:00] unclaimed funds.
And right now there are businesses, they’re, they’re called, like, heir locators or finder services or asset recovery firms, that will track down people sometimes, like, e- even including cousins. Like, it, it ends up- Mm ... so first it goes, like, if you’re childless, it goes to your parents then brothers and sisters, and then grandparents, aunts and uncles, and then distant cousins.
Okay. So there are... If, if it’s a really, like, wealthy person or something, there are companies that will actually try to track down these cousins and then tell them about the unclaimed funds for a fee. But again, these are like... This isn’t very glorious work, right? Yeah. So it’s not attracting the world’s best and brightest.
And, and here, some entrepreneurial Basecamp listener or listeners can just use AI and a, a little bit of work to make a pretty good business that just tracks these things down. Wait,
Malcolm Collins: did you already do this for people?
Simone Collins: Well, so I just, I just [00:17:00] tried one out so because already you can search and claim w- like, property for free using tools.
There’s the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators, unclaimed.org. There’s Missing Money. You could also just go to each state’s unclaimed property portal. So ‘cause it’s, it’s on a state-by-state basis. And so what I did just really quick,
Cause I got distracted and Octavian was whining, I, I decided to just, like, c- check both of our names and, and some business names that I should be regularly checking for, and I do with several states that we’ve been in. Yeah. And actually I found one for you. So it’s like, it’s only 50 to $100, but, like-
Malcolm Collins: Was it a bank account or something?
Simone Collins: I’m not gonna disclose. I’ll tell you after. But yeah. It, it was in Texas. It had our old Blackburn address, and I was like, “Oh, that’s definitely you.” Malcolm Collins, Blackburn, there we go.
Malcolm Collins: But yeah, to do this for... That, I mean, that’s not really the same, but I mean, I guess you, you made a little bit of money there.
Simone Collins: But go ahead. Yeah, no, I’m, that’s not just [00:18:00] it. I’m just saying, like, in, in merely the process of, like, thinking about it and toying around with the existing tools, I made you money. There is, there’s potential here. Here’s a- Earning potential ...
Malcolm Collins: better thing to do. Yeah If you’re a Base Camp listener and you don’t have a will yet, if people have forgotten about this system that we have if you put...
What is our foundation’s official name on paper?
Simone Collins: Oh, the Techno-Puritan Federation.
Malcolm Collins: No, no, no, no. The one w- oh, that’s the legal entity that’s
Simone Collins: the Techno- That’s our religion.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yes. But you can do the Techno-Puritan Federation or the Pragmatist Foundation, right? That’s what it’s called, the Pragmatist Foundation.
Mm-hmm. And if you give it to either of these, both are non-profits, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. One is a nonprofit and also a religion. The other one’s just a normal- Yeah ... level 1[c]3.
Malcolm Collins: So if you give it to either of these nonprofits, what we do is we, If you, if you have your DNA stored anywhere, we basically will eventually put it on whatever we end up creating.
If we end up creating the civilization we wanna create put it in the database with the amount of money that you ended up [00:19:00] donating from your death, right?
Simone Collins: What if they have reproductive material on ice? Like I’ve s- I’m sure you’ve seen the headlines today. It’s like, “Oh, we think that Jeffrey Epstein’s sperm still belongs to his trust and estate.”
Like, what are we gonna do- Yeah ... about this?
Malcolm Collins: What
Simone Collins: if- Are people gonna... Like, can they leave us their, their, their dunna in the form of-
Malcolm Collins: That’s the idea, is that they leave us their DNA, and that if in the future-
Simone Collins: Eggs and sperm? Are, are we, are we accepting eggs
Malcolm Collins: and sperm? They can do that if they want. But the point is the DNA because it’s if we’re creating artificial worlds in a few hundred years or something like that, and they’re choosing who to populate those with, or they’re, you know, people will presumably be grateful at the civilization that we end up starting.
So that’s fun. By the way, one of the things that I’ve been doing recently is looking at starting up, And I’ll, I’ll talk to you about this. And I, and we’ve been connected with Nux- Yay ... who’s even watched some of our shows. And I was like, “Hey, like, we should start up a an actual, like, think tank/nonprofit for the new right.”
Like, we’re really [00:20:00] not organized in the way the rest of, like, the legacy right is organized or puts things together, and it would make sense for us to be, especially during political seasons to be able to, like... I mean, imagine, like, looping together, like, Scott Pressler, who’s a contact-
Simone Collins: What do you call it?
The, the tard vanguard?
Malcolm Collins: What?
Simone Collins: The tard vanguard? The- The tard
Malcolm Collins: vanguard?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Hmm, I’m trying to think. I’m just spitballing names here. Yeah, the...
Malcolm Collins: You with our video games.
Simone Collins: You, it, the vi- viga-
Malcolm Collins: No,
Simone Collins: it should be called- Vi- video game lantes, vigilantes?
Malcolm Collins: You with our video games, signed, the nerds.
Simone Collins: You can pry, you can pry my bouncy breasted video game avatar from my cold dead hands. Yeah, we’ll work on this. We’ll figure this out. Yeah. I’ll finish with the, the final, the final dark pair. I don’t even know how to make this light, so I can’t.
Malcolm Collins: Okay. Here
Simone Collins: we go. But w- this, the article ended with, “Back in her art [00:21:00] studio, Kant processes how her life is set to shift in the coming years through painting.
She created a series about being alone, but being part of a larger world. She also made a collection of autumn leaf portraits that explore aging, decay, and the search for where we belong. ‘I’m thinking about what my legacy will be,’ she said.” Which sucks, because she doesn’t have a legacy. Like,
Malcolm Collins: she lives- Yeah, you’re looking to be scaring young people out of having
Simone Collins: kids
like, we are, like, there is, there is a, I mean, depe- if you wanna like do it with like homo sapiens, like 300,000 a year, or if you wanna do, do life, three billion year, like, unending marathon relay game, or like, chain letter. And you, you, you’re letting it die. Like, that’s, that is your legacy, is the termination-
Malcolm Collins: For all of human civilization, people who replicate it
Simone Collins: of three billion years of life fighting, suffering to continue, to carry [00:22:00] on. And you, your legacy is, “I’m gonna snuff that out. I don’t care. I’m not gonna try. I’m not even going to try.” That’s, that’s her legacy. And, and, and, and, and of course her- I thought about it, darling ... dead body is, is gonna be found in her condo, and, you know, it’s, who knows how old it’s gonna be, ‘cause who knows how her spreadsheet of friends is really gonna pan out.
Malcolm Collins: Eaten
Simone Collins: by her cat. And, and some government appointed cleanup crew, which of course, another opportunity is, is cleanup crews for houses with rotting bodies of infirm- Yeah, robots can’t
Malcolm Collins: do that yet ... old
Simone Collins: people. Yeah, I know. I’m, that’s true. Although, did you hear that there’s there’s this new company that is deploying housekeepers in New York City with cameras on their heads to train future cleaning robots?
It’s kinda fun. I- Oh my God ... I, I like that idea.
Malcolm Collins: So, so, while I’m reading one, ‘cause I’ll, I’ll read a story too- Oh my
Simone Collins: God. Oh, that would be really cool if, like, I could make money cleaning my own house by wearing a camera on my head while I did [00:23:00] it. Oh. Can we... I need to reach out to that startup.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, see, yeah.
Simone Collins: Dude, because that’s, that’s way more efficient. It’s just why are they hiring, like, making a cleaning business when they could just be like, “Hey, housewives, can you just, can you just wear this, this dash cam on your forehead?”
Malcolm Collins: And we could create, like, a network of housewives to make money while they’re cleaning.
Simone Collins: Oh, my God. Look, we’re on, we’re on a roll,
Malcolm Collins: okay? Ask them if they would be up for this, ‘cause we probably have enough housewife fans that we could put together a genuine network doing
Simone Collins: this. Dude, and, like, we’re doing it anyway, you know? Yeah. Like, ugh.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, my God. I mean- Yeah, Liable Human. This can be part of the
Simone Collins: liablehuman.com.
Liable Human. We got the cleaning, the, the, the, the clean cam. I mean,
Malcolm Collins: I- But okay, so when I start-
Simone Collins: Yeah, you do your thing. You do your- ...
Malcolm Collins: talking here, you make a note to yourself about liablehuman.com. Yeah. And go to rfab.ai- And clean cam ... and try out, it’s at the bottom right now, the recipe feature. Okay. I just tried it on the site.
It seems to be working. I wanna get your takeaway on [00:24:00] this. But okay. So this one is from 2025. “I regret belittling men. At 63, I’ve ended up alone. I’d always imagined I would end up married with two wonderful children, living in a house in the countryside. I have paid a hefty price for my so-called liberation.
A few years ago, I went to Italy with my then boyfriend, James. As we sat tucking into the plate of frutti di mare at a seaside
Simone Collins: restaurant-” Ugh, frutti di mare’s such a gross dish. Girl.
Malcolm Collins: What is it?
Simone Collins: It’s just, like, a bunch of seafood thrown on top of pasta.
Malcolm Collins: Sounds gross, yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah, gross.
Malcolm Collins: I struck up a conversation with the waiter in Italian.
Of course she has to mention that, right? Oh
Simone Collins: my God. Oh my God. Please let it be... Michael, if you’re listening, I’m so sorry, but, like, the way you speak Italian.
Malcolm Collins: Oh my God. That’s my dad, by the way ... yeah ... who always has to speak in Italian to waiters.
Simone Collins: But, like, in, in, like, the c- the way that, like, kids get angry about, where you’re like, it’s like- No,
Malcolm Collins: it’s annoying because he does it when he goes to Italian restaurants in the United [00:25:00] States. He does- With
Simone Collins: the affectation, but without the correct accent. Like, that’s, that’s the one thing. Can
Malcolm Collins: you imagine as a kid how embarrassed you would be if every time your dad took you to an Italian restaurant, when the waiter
Simone Collins: would- Prego, the fruit de mer.
Yeah, it’s cold ...
Malcolm Collins: clearly an American, he would try to order in a... It’s literally out of a- God, what’s that fricking guy who does those movies? Exci-
Simone Collins: the guy who does the movies?
Malcolm Collins: No, the, the guy’s names. Of course. Out of, out of this guy’s movies, like the one where it ends and it’s, like, he died and they change his tombstone to say, like, he died saving a bunch of people from a sinking ship.
... It... Come on. You know the movies I’m talking about. They have a huge style to them. The
Simone Collins: movies with Wes
Malcolm Collins: Anderson- The Royal Tenenbaums he did ... I know the
Simone Collins: answer to that question. The movies with the style to them is Wes Anderson.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, the Royal Tenenbaums. Who’s the, who’s the guy I’m thinking of?
Simone Collins: Wes Anderson.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, Wes Anderson. My dad is, like, literally out of Wes Anderson. Like- No ... in a Wes Anderson movie, I can see a dad who always sat down and started
Simone Collins: ordering- [00:26:00]
Malcolm Collins: Okay. Okay, maybe ... in Italian, and everyone would look. The movies with the style. Just lets you sit in the cringe.
Il salmone, per favore, con una spruzzata di limone e una spruzzata di mistero
Simone Collins: Stewing in it a little bit. Yeah.
Yeah, like some little shrimp in
Malcolm Collins: a fruit de mer. Okay. By the, by the way, did you get... Have you gotten to the recipe generator yet?
Simone Collins: I, I’m sorry. I’m looking through the litany of features. Oh, there it is at the very bottom between-
Malcolm Collins: I told you, yeah, at the bottom. Come on.
Simone Collins: I’m so- whoa.
Malcolm Collins: Are you, are you putting it in right now? Yeah, yeah.
Simone Collins: Well, I mean, where do I... Oh, so you can choose cuisine by nation or region, so I’m gonna choose... Ooh, well, not Mongolian. I don’t want fricking yak butter. Was that... Oh, no, that’s Tibetan, right? That’s... Your mom, like, basically didn’t eat anything she chose so- It’s
Malcolm Collins: not.
Just choose one, Simone.
Simone Collins: Oh, well, g- aw. Okay, Shanghai, because we just, we just made something that was sort of Shanghai based. And then, Ooh, [00:27:00] Shanghai soul food fusion. Oh, yeah. Okay. And then w- meal type dinner
Malcolm Collins: You don’t have to choose every option,
Simone. You can just
Simone Collins: choose- Oh, time available under 15 minutes and for one person ‘cause I always just make food for you.
And interesting. Th- there’s no, like, there has to be meat in it. I guess I’ll just do high protein though.
Malcolm Collins: No, if you want to, you can choose the type of meat in it, or you can
choose
Simone Collins: vegetarian. Oh, that’s true. Oh, yeah, flavor profile, spicy All right. Okay, creative mode. Ooh, dish from the distant future?
Dude, fantasy tavern dish. Historical recre- ha. For- forbidden combination. Break the rules. C- well, but I, yeah, but I, I chose my, my regions. Okay, I’m just gonna click ... Ooh, generate recipe image too. Okay, generate six recipe ideas.
Malcolm Collins: Okay, you, you just
Simone Collins: unclicked- Okay, Shanghai-based soul food ...
Malcolm Collins: Simone. You didn’t unclick generate recipe i- i- image.
It was auto-clicked, right?
Simone Collins: I know. I didn’t unclick it.
Malcolm Collins: Okay.
Simone Collins: Don’t worry, [00:28:00] I am tard, but I am not Treytard. I am just-
Malcolm Collins: Is it, is it generating now? Do you see
Simone Collins: the nice- Oh, petite tard. Okay ...
Malcolm Collins: animation and everything?
Simone Collins: Ooh, okay. Okay. So spicy Shanghai rice cake stir fry, quick spicy red braised pork skillet, fiery crab and greens
I hate, I can’t do, and I don’t like okra. Chili sweet potato and pea hash, and blazing pork and crab noodle toss. So we’re going with the quick spicy red braised pork skillet. Generate full recipe.
Malcolm Collins: And take a screenshot of the recipe when you get it so I can put it here for- Mm ... when people are
Simone Collins: watching the episode.
Mm-mm. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, my God.
Simone Collins: We’re
Octavian Collins: spinning it.
Simone Collins: Ooh. Tell me about this woman and her fruitti di mare with James, right? Was it James? Was it- Okay ... John?
Malcolm Collins: Back in the hotel, he asked me why I had ignored him. By speaking in a language he didn’t understand- Oh. ... he said I managed to make him feel small. I could see his point.
[00:29:00] I spent quite a while chatting away, oblivious to how he must be feeling. I then went on to joke about how that as an Italian speaker I would order for us after he didn’t know what osso buco meant. I was showing off. Clearly, that’s kind of a jerk thing to do. I did
Simone Collins: not want osso buco. Ew, ...
Malcolm Collins: I, I know, right?
It wasn’t the first time something like that had happened to me. I was always taken- Oh,
Simone Collins: Malcolm, this looks really good. Oh, my God.
Malcolm Collins: Right. Did it fully output with the picture and everything?
Simone Collins: Yeah. It’s, it’s got the steaming ... Mm, you can see the little pepper flakes on it.
Malcolm Collins: But also look at how it formats everything.
Simone Collins: No, this is really nice, and like, but the enticing ... It, it gives you, like, this like a food blog style image output.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, my God. And then it gives you a food blog with a separated menu section, time section, cooking section, and then at the end we run another internet search capable AI-
Simone Collins: Nutrition per serving?
Malcolm, you love me.
Malcolm Collins: Right. Aw. And then at the end we run [00:30:00] another search AI on the output of the first search AI just to correct anything that might be wrong or need nuance within the initial output.
Simone Collins: Malcolm, are you publishing all these results in an indexable part of our website that becomes rich?
No, but
Malcolm Collins: that’s a really good idea.
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm. I think you really, I think you should so that things like Google searches will point to it ‘Cause this is great fusion, like, recipes.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And then people will make their, their cursed recipes and stuff like that to try to make a big indexing of it.
Simone Collins: A drink pairing?
Oh my gosh. A chilled off-dry riesling? I mean, gross, but, like, I get it actually with this. Or unsweetened iced tea with lemon. Food safety tips. Oh my gosh.
Malcolm Collins: Didn’t I go over the top with the creation of this feature?
Simone Collins: You went, you went super over the top, but I am
Malcolm Collins: here for it. Because now I’m getting better at making these sorts of things, I immediately was like, “Ooh, how can I make this...”
And I don’t know if you noticed, but next to this button we also put-
Simone Collins: Refrigerate [00:31:00] leftovers within two hours. You... Food safety. Avoid overcrowding the pork so the pork- the pans so the pork sears rather than steams. Yes, okay.
Malcolm Collins: Ooh. I also made a feature for this that well, one I’m gonna add, ‘cause I just had the idea to add it, is a feature where you put in, like, “I have too much of X ingredient in my fridge, I need to use it all,” or put in, like, “I have X, Y, and Z in my refrigerator, I wanna get rid of it.”
Simone Collins: Yes.
Yes. Oh my gosh, Malcolm.
Malcolm Collins: And I’ll add something that’s, like, meat-based in general dish, right?
Simone Collins: Have I mentioned I love you?
Malcolm Collins: But I don’t know if you noticed, but next to this, the other new feature I made was for people doing D&D campaigns or, like, any sort of campaigns.
Simone Collins: I saw that, yeah. You can
Malcolm Collins: put in the rule book and it will just, like, auto help you with the next turn with your players.
Simone Collins: Bless you, sir. You’re doing God’s work.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, right? But I just made this stuff because somebody on the Leaflet stream- Wait, you’re- ... wanted that, and I was like, “Sure, I can make that.”
Simone Collins: For a Leaflet fan, anything. Come on. Yeah ... yeah. I, Okay, tell me about this woman whose, whose [00:32:00] boyfriend- Okay, okay ... is un- inse- The...
So one, this guy can just take a hike anyway because his reaction was to feel insecure when she spoke Italian intolerably as an American in a restaurant- Yeah ... instead of, like, to feel embarrassed.
Malcolm Collins: Okay, so anyway.
Octavian Collins: Can I tell you
Malcolm Collins: something I
Octavian Collins: learned?
Simone Collins: Okay, you can tell them what you learned. Hold on.
Octavian’s gonna tell us what he learned.
Octavian Collins: Here’s another fun fact of the day. You can make a window by your- self if you had some, if you had some, like a sand hammer glass, and then you can, like, melt it, and then let it cool, and then get, window mold, and then let it dry for a couple of days, and then ta-da, you get your own window.
Simone Collins: Love you, buddy.
Malcolm Collins: Fun fact. If you have sand- Yes ... melt it into glass and make your
Simone Collins: own window.
Octavian Collins: Another fun fact of the day. It’s, Did you know you can sew a shirt by yourself? Hello, hello? Like this one, like
Simone Collins: this big. It’s true. Yeah, you know, [00:33:00] people even made their own fabric in the past, Octavia.
Octavian Collins: Yeah, .
Malcolm Collins: That’s the type of useful fact- Phew ... you’re getting from him. Yeah. With us it’s just how to make money from people. Yeah, ew ... but let’s look up, Can you just tell me more things?
We’ll, we’ll go over this later. No,
Simone Collins: no, no, buddy, you gotta work.
Malcolm Collins: To do this attorney thing. Tell me more things. But I, I wanna continue here. Okay. Can I just tell you more things? I’m convinced the reason I’m still booking a table for one at the age of 63 instead of having settled with a significant other is because like so many women of my generation, feminism has ruined my love life.
Instead of empowering us, those ideals of second wave feminism made us believe that marriage and domesticity were to be avoided like the plague, and that men were competitor rather than partners. I might have a successful career as a writer and broadcaster, but I never had children, underlying bolded, or been married, and my longest relationship lasted eight years.
I regret this. I always imagined I would end up married with two wonderful children and living in a house at the countryside. I’ve paid a hefty price for my so-called liberation. I was 17 and a pupil at Golders and Leigh Mire, one of Britain’s most academic institutions, when I [00:34:00] was introduced to the women’s liberation movement.
It offered so much hope and excitement, and we spent our lunch breaks soaking up feminist mantras of Geramir Greer and Betty Friedman. Act like the men they bribed- Betty, Betty Friedman? ... as they burned their bras and demolished... I, Betty Friedman. I don’t know. Betty Fr- some, some Jewish name, Betty Friedman.
A bra is, and demonized housework in the family. And now here I’m not saying that, like, Jews are a problem. Clearly this got to a Jewish woman. Like, th- this was a Jewish man who ended up not getting a wife ‘cause she burned her bra or whatever, right? I, obviously this is what men wanted them to do in the first place, like yeah, go braless.
What, what are you doing, you know? End up destroying their breasts at like the age of 30.
Simone Collins: I don’t think you destroy your breasts- Oh, yeah ... by not wearing support.
Malcolm Collins: If you, if you, if you don’t wear support your breasts start sagging much faster.
Simone Collins: Do they actually? Hmm.
Malcolm Collins: From what I’ve heard, yes.
Simone Collins: We, we can fact check this.
Malcolm Collins: Why don’t you, why don’t you fact check that?
Simone Collins: G- Grok.
Malcolm Collins: By the time I was 25 clutching a degree in French and [00:35:00] Italian I was a bright, confident feminist keen to flex her intellectual muscles and to never let a man get the last word. I read Nietzsche for fun, and my bedside table was always buckled beneath the weight of substantial intellectually challenging books.
God, she
Simone Collins: sounds so annoying. Nietzsche and Betty Friedman
Malcolm Collins: Right? But not many feminists read niche, I’ll tell you that.
Simone Collins: No, n- Not wearing a bra does not cause breasts to sag earlier, according to the Cleveland Health Clinic, but also via Grok. This is a common myth without strong scientific backing.
Breast sagging, medically called ptosis, happens primarily due to natural factors, and bra wearing habits have little to no proven long-term impact on it. Besides, Malcolm, I don’t wear a bra.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, you don’t?
Simone Collins: I wear stays, though, which is the, the OG bra. The
Malcolm Collins: OG bra?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, my gosh. So, we... I... We keep finding that Leaflet and you dress in the same outfits.
Like, she wears these what, what do you call them, at nights? Like, the medieval outfits.
Simone Collins: A, a chemise.
Malcolm Collins: Chemise. But th- th- wh- wh-
Simone Collins: That’s [00:36:00] just the, the universal undergarment. This, this is a chemise.
Malcolm Collins: She...
Simone Collins: You looked like the- W- we literally found that we shop at the same stores. The women from my n- She has...
She’s a woman of taste, okay?
Malcolm Collins: And like- ... medieval plays, and now I realize that in real life she also dresses like a medieval woman, and I’m like- Well, that’s like, it, it, the best thing is- ... this is, we gotta get this new, like, nerd right. We all dress like medieval women, it’s not just you. That’s
Simone Collins: like- I think that’s a, that’s, it’s just a continuation of that...
I think we even did an episode on it, when, like, when conservative anon accounts got doxxed, it just turned out that they were, like, attractive, cool people who are, like, well-adjusted. And I think it’s the same with VTubers. Like, were they to be unmasked, it will turn out that they were, they are attractive, cool people who actually look as cool, if not cooler, than their VTuber avatars.
Malcolm Collins: Right. I wanna, I wanna start the trend. I like this trend. All of the, like, new right women, our thing is, like, we all dress m- like medieval fantasy people. Like we’re, we’re princesses, right? That’s what everybody wants to be anyway.
Speaker 4: I just realized that [00:37:00] in real life, like new right women are beginning to dress like the characters that the left is freaking out about and calling a fetish from the Knight’s Path, where they’re just like normal medieval females who are sweet and kind, and the left is like, “Oh my God, how could you do this?
This is a weird, perverted fetish.” , Which I like. I, I don’t mind. I don’t mind. We might do a whole episode on this
Malcolm Collins: Ah. And then it will become cool, and progressives won’t be able to dress that way anymore, and they’ll get all annoyed.
That, and when we’re younger, we all dress like Emilia, okay? The, the art hoe look- So you
Simone Collins: go from, like, art hoe to- ...
Malcolm Collins: conservative guys are into it, right? I love it when, like, Totally, like, Coping ShortFatOtaku did a piece where he’s like, “Oh you know, no, none of these conservative art hoe girls actually exist.”
And I was like, “Simone dressed exactly like that when I met her.” A lot of the conservative girls now who are on the right, like The Nerd Right- And did dress like
Simone Collins: Emilia. Oh, my God,
Malcolm Collins: yeah ... originally dressed like Emilia. You think Leaflet didn’t dress like Emilia at some point in her life? You know, like, come on, people.
Look,
Simone Collins: we’ve all... If we’ve been in America we’ve- [00:38:00]
Malcolm Collins: And, and we, the only reason they’re not dressing like that now is because it’s not cool to dress like that when you’re in your 40s. Now you go for the medieval phase. Okay. By the time I was 25, clutching a degree in French and Italian, what a pointless degree, I was a bright, confident feminist keen to flex her intellectual muscle.
Oh, no, I’m gonna read you whenever that.. For, at first men loved my wit and intelligence. “You’re such a breath of fresh air. I love talking to you. You’re the first woman I’ve met who stimulates me,” they’d trill. Trill
what type of guy says that to somebody? And if you have a degree in French and Italian, what interesting thing could you possibly have to say? But anyway,
Simone Collins: that was- Well, I thought you said breast of fresh air, so that, I thought that was the dead giveaway,
Malcolm Collins: but. Oh, yes. That was until I had lectured them for the umpteenth time on the virtues of modernism.
Mm-hmm. “You’ll never win an argument against Kate,” one man said as he watched me outsmart yet another potential lover. Subtext, don’t bother. No, what he meant by that is you’ll never back down from an argument. No one always wins an argument. Even [00:39:00] between Simone and I, she wins quite frequently.
Simone Collins: In a- Nice try, Malcolm
Malcolm Collins: You do.
You do. Oh, yeah, I, you, you joke that I don’t even bet with you anymore because I’m so frequently wrong.
Simone Collins: That’s just because the only time I will say, “Do you wanna put money on it?” is when I know I’m gonna win. And you figured that out really
Malcolm Collins: quick ... men had called me intimidating, scary, opinionated. I now see that not only was I trying to prove I was their intellectual equal or superior, I was treating every encounter with a man like he was my adversary.
If a date brought me a bouquet of flowers, instead of smiling and putting them in a vase of water, I would bite their head off. Can’t you buy me some nice olive branch or balsamic vinegar? Oh, sorry, some nice olive oil or a balsamic vinegar. What a, what a jerk thing to say to somebody- Malcolm ... who bought you flowers.
Simone Collins: That’s true. That’s true. But, like, you buy me popcorn instead of.
Malcolm Collins: I fed with my eye roll to one hapless suitor as he stood, wilting faster than the fragrant offering he held in his hand.
Simone Collins: Oh.
Malcolm Collins: He had bothered to think about making me [00:40:00] happy, and I crush him for it. And flowers are expensive, too. By the way- It’s true.
Simone Collins: Flowers are su- they’re, they’re a costly signal. Like, the whole point of giving flowers is that they are useless, but you choose to give them to someone anyway. Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: people.
Simone Collins: Like, the, the, the gift that, that is famously terrible for a man to give to his lady partner is something that’s useful, like a vacuum.
Oh, no, that’s a terrible gift, and here she is scoffing at him. Of course, if he gave her something useful, he’d be like, “Oh, what? You expect me to cook you something with olive oil?” Like, there is no winning with this kind of ideology. But she’s come to recognize that in her dotage.
Malcolm Collins: By the way, if you wanna make your w- life hap- wife happy, I learned a new thing that I can do to make Simone happy.
Simone Collins: Oh,
Malcolm Collins: my God. And so you guys can do this for your wives. If you ever see dust accumulating in a corner or on a stair corner or anything like that, clean it up for them while they’re doing something else, and they will be very appreciative because- I just
Simone Collins: saw what you did today in that, right over there.
Thank you.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. I place so much importance on finding a, [00:41:00] quote-unquote, “strong man who can match me” that I forgot men were people with feelings. I, I, indeed I forgot I had feelings and hid my softness. No, the thing is, is she wanted a strong man, but she also saw it as a red flag or a negative sign if a guy was better than her, right?
Mm-hmm. Like, a guy can’t just be like, “Yeah, I know more than you.” And Simone admitted that fairly early in our relationship that I just know more than her about most things, and that’s okay.
Simone Collins: It’s okay.
Malcolm Collins: I now see that I had longed to be loved, but I was scared to be vulnerable. I was using my sharp mind to protect my all-too-soft heart against yet future rejection.
Another thing I regret deeply is the tally of my one-night stands when I was younger. I distinctly remember thinking it would be uncool to say no to men I met at parties or dated, but I struggled to enjoy it. There was always a disconnect. This was abundantly clear the morning after. As I lay there waiting for a sign of affection, he would be singing the triumphs of Had Her song in the shower.
A [00:42:00] quick cheerio and he was gone. While I pretended to enjoy it, I felt uncomfortable about sex so early on. I felt sad and used. Sorry, I felt empty and used. My generation of women were encouraged to have sex like a man. In other words, have casual sex, and it backfired. Fast-forward to now, the idea that women are different from men, that casual sex can be harmful, is gaining traction.
In her last book, A Guide to Sex in the 21st Century, the young adult adaptation, Louise Perry explores how the sexual revolution impacted women negatively and led to unwanted consequences. Ooh, Louise Perry is impacting feminists now. I mean, Louise Perry has always been a feminist. We interviewed her.
Well,
Simone Collins: she, well, yeah, she started out from a- She was on the show ... just like us, from a progressive perspective, and I- she’s still, her primary audience, at least the last time we, like a couple years back, was progressives who started to have thoughts-
Malcolm Collins: Uh-oh ... about vaccines Don’t have thoughts, ‘cause then you’re not a progressive anymore, right?
Mm. You get kicked out. I mean, she’s seen as a far-righter at this point ‘cause she [00:43:00] also, you know, questions the trans agenda. Well,
Simone Collins: but she’s one of the far-righters who has, like, an audience primarily among far-righters, progressives who are like, “Look at me being naughty. I’m going to read Louise Perry.”
Malcolm Collins: I al- I always thought her, like, core audience was lesbians who are pissed off that trans people keep hitting on them and invade their spaces.
That’s sort of like most of the people on her show I get the impression of, is like Louise Perry- Well, ‘cause that’s like the one group of, of women who when she’s ... Of like her core thing is like women aren’t actually into being choked, and I’m like, “They’re not actually into like a big strong man.” I’m like, “Yeah, it’s because of men that the monster effer category at Barnes & Nobles is like three rows.”
Simone Collins: Is, is a category. Uh-huh.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, it’s because of men that like 50 Shades of Gray was a bestseller. I believe you, Louise Perry. Mm. But I think like the one cate- b- well, I mean you, you gotta have your head in the sand a bit as a woman to not like recognize that like even if you’re not turned on by something, clearly the majority of women are, right?
You know, or there’s a big audience out there for it. But [00:44:00] yeah. How can people make money off of being other people’s power of attorney? Like, how do they advertise themselves for this? How do they find people who want this? What’s your... Because Simone, ‘cause she does have Jew DNA, so she got, like, plus five in mercantil- mercantilism- Mercantilism
as- as- as being born half Jew. Oh, no. By the way, she’s not half Jew. She’s one-eighths Jew, but it’s, it’s matrilineal, so they consider it,
Simone Collins: So then I’m all Jew. I’m a Jewess.
Malcolm Collins: For- for Jews
Simone Collins: According
Malcolm Collins: to ... but yeah. That- that- that unfortunately, the half Jew started her into, she heard about sad women and then thought, “How can I make money off of them?”
So- Dude,
Simone Collins: well, you’re welcome for the 50-plus dollars I got you today.
Malcolm Collins: So go and help people here. Now, how do they set this up to exploit people? And if you’re a Base Camp fan, you can always use us as your power of attorney. We’ll make some easy way to handle this. So- Well,
Simone Collins: I mean, sometimes you have to be present, so it is important to be able to find.
But I think the- We
Malcolm Collins: can go and be present if somebody’s, like, dying or needs the decision, Simone. [00:45:00]
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. Fair enough. We can. I- I would... N- I mean, the... Go to my show notes. I will put them in the show notes. Just, like, look at your specific state if you’re in the United States at what the regulations are around what you need to- to qualify, how you, how you might need to be certified to become a power of attorney.
And then figure out the best way in your state to make yourself an easy search result when people in your state search for power of attorney.
Malcolm Collins: And you can vibe good this, right?
Simone Collins: You can totally vibe good this. And then what you need to do is just make yourself really easy to reach via phone, ‘cause- The boomer generation that is going to need this service really likes just picking up their phone and calling people possibly just showing up at addresses.
We know this from experience. So I think if you can have a, an address where people can just show up and a phone number, at least a phone number that people can just [00:46:00] call and you can answer, I think you could start... And you’re properly certified for your state, even if you need to be. You might not need to be, and you don’t even need to be a CPA or an attorney necessarily.
Just start offering it, and, and I mean, you, you need to be ready to commit to this to actually follow through. Some states like in Pennsylvania will put a cap on certain services related to stuff I brought up in this, like in terms of recovering finances. Our state, Pennsylvania, will cap how much you can charge in terms of like finders fees in helping people recover this money that has been left by distant cousins who didn’t have any friends or family in wills.
But just look it up. Use, use, use Malcolm’s super search feature on rfab.ai and figure it out, and then create a website.
Malcolm Collins: Another thing that you can use us for, by the way, if we’re thinking of services we can offer to people- Yeah ... is if you’re getting married to somebody, you know how we have like our marriage contract?
Mm-hmm. One of our early episodes is on how to put one of those together. If you need a line in the [00:47:00] contract about disagreements with a partner that involves some form of third-party
Simone Collins: intervention- Oh, an arbitrator.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah ... yeah, and you’re like, “Malcolm and Simone seem fairly reasonable as an arbitrator,” we’re happy to serve that role where we just say, basically we make the decision when both of you can’t agree on something.
Simone Collins: Make a call. Yeah. Yeah, we, we have, We’ll just ... we have arbitrators in in our marriage contract specifically related to the fat clause. That’s the one place where we have arbitrators.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, who’s the arbitrat- Oh, is it my mom?
Simone Collins: It’s, it’s y- your brother and, and- Oh ... our sister-in-law. Because they, they are good, like, they’re on the more judgment...
But they, neither of them would lie about either of us getting a little
Malcolm Collins: chunk. Oh, no, they would totally be honest about it. Yeah. They’d be like- Yeah ... “Yeah, you’re, you’re chubsters.”
Simone Collins: Yeah. They would enjoy, they would enjoy saying it, so.
Malcolm Collins: If you don’t have a will, get a will. Put us in it. The, the-
Simone Collins: Yeah, but also exploit the reality that apparently many aging, childless, parentless, family, friendless old people are going to [00:48:00] die with assets.
Of course, many of them are gonna die with negative net worths, but you could potentially make some money from this too. So yeah, take lemons, turn them into lemonade. It’s doable, and I love you very much, Malcolm.
Malcolm Collins: I love you too, Simone.
Simone Collins: Oh. Which one would you like to do next?
Malcolm Collins: All right.
Simone Collins: Did you watch
Malcolm Collins: the end of Euphoria?
Simone Collins: No. I’m gonna watch it tonight. It’s my treat.
Malcolm Collins: Okay, okay, then I won’t mention anything.
Speaker 9: For those wondering, the first thing that came up when I searched the Christian family from Euphoria was some other person being with him, um, at the end of the show
Simone Collins: Yeah, don’t. Dude, I mean, like the, the previous episode was oh oh. It’s like I- I,
Malcolm Collins: well, I can guess it- ... can’t even ... because I, I got more information than you have from looking up clips of the family, the rural family.
Simone Collins: Oh, did she go back to them? Don’t know
Malcolm Collins: I won’t, I won’t say anything
Simone Collins: I hope she doesn’t like die trying to get there.
Oh, geez. Okay, well The,
Malcolm Collins: the [00:49:00] scene with them when I put it on, the, the, the first scene with them is very sweet. Isn’t it? ... where... Well, it’s sweet, but also in that sort of sad progre- Like, when the other girl asks her why she wouldn’t trade positions with her, she just looks upset and then turns up the radio.
Simone Collins: Yeah, like she doesn’t explain, “Oh, well, I’ve been turned into a drug mule, and like all my friends are miserable, and...” Yeah, we need to be more clear about what’s
Malcolm Collins: going- I, and I really feel this w- like when progressives come after us, like this recently had a negative podcast on us. And I’m like, “Bro, we really are like just trying to help you,” right?
Like, I love their like, their marriage. Well, yeah, they seem to love each other, but they never talk about how hot the other one is and how they want to like jump each other’s bones and stuff. They, they just seem to respect each other. And it’s like- Wow ... maybe you shouldn’t structure your marriage off of that.
That’s a bad way to structure things.
Simone Collins: Yeah, no, read, read my early diaries though and it’s, it’s pretty clear,
Malcolm Collins: Oh, in the early days. Yeah, you know.
Simone Collins: Look, [00:50:00] if we weren’t as sleep deprived and stressed as we are right now, I think we would just constantly have that on our minds too. But guess what?
We’ve given ourselves bigger things to worry about.
Malcolm Collins: Well, I, I was almost thought of doing an episode pointing out that like when you have kids, babysitters are just prostitutes with extra steps because- They
Simone Collins: are though, ‘cause you’re paying that person for their time in order to have sex.
Malcolm Collins: So that you have time to sleep- Yeah
with your partner, right?
Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.
Malcolm Collins: You know? Mm-hmm. Yeah. Because otherwise you got the baby in the room and everything like that, you know.
Simone Collins: Yeah, gross.
And no, having it, like I... You can’t get turned on if your baby is in another room crying. I don’t know how that works for people. I also though don’t know how people have sex in front of their pets which apparently happens a decent amount.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that sounds really gross. Like the, the pet is either looking at you or not looking at you. Both- I
Simone Collins: mean, I could handle fish, like goldfish or something.
Malcolm Collins: Oh yeah, I can understand that. I’m thinking a dog obviously, right? Yeah. Like obviously- Like a dog understands what’s [00:51:00] happening. The, you know, it’s like-
Simone Collins: Yeah, like a cat might not pay that much attention, so maybe they just be like asleep in a corner and you’d like contextualize them as more like a pillow, you know?
You can kind of write it off. Anyway.
Malcolm Collins: Oh my God fun. By the way, the episode that I prepped for today is why we stopped believing women slash why did Democrats stop caring about grape. Is
Simone Collins: this your, is this your ass mogging video or not?
Malcolm Collins: No, it’s not that one. I, I like the ass mogging one- There’s another one
but like I can just riff on that topic anytime. This one is more-
Simone Collins: Okay. Fair ...
Malcolm Collins: in depth.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Speaking of pillows, like my highlight of yesterday, I mean, you know, aside from like our meaningful life and everything, was I saw one of our pillows that your mom gifted to us, I- on, on, on the Nancy Drew show, like that HBO stupid fantasy mystery show.
I was like, “Oh my God, we have that pillow.” I got so excited. [00:52:00] Those stupid rough ass pillows that your mom got for us. You know, the, the, the like burlap ones.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Oh, anyway. I, I’ll get us
Malcolm Collins: started. Love you, sweetheart.
Simone Collins: Life is delightful.
Speaker 5: no, no.
Are the apples wet? They, they have a lot. All apples
No, no, apples are just naturally a bit wet,
the dust- Come on, Toasty ... that
Speaker 8: you’re always so worried about, right?
Speaker 5: Torsten, eat an apple. What are you doing?
She didn’t lick them all
Speaker 6: I want it back to zoo. It’s true.
Speaker 5: I know it’s true. I, I promise you she- Jackson,
Speaker 6: you were-
Speaker 5: See, Tyne [00:53:00] didn’t. That would be a really long thing for her to do, Josie You
Speaker 8: make her too much fun. We went in the-
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe -
In this episode of Based Camp, we explore the recent wave of anti-marriage feminist influencers who suddenly get engaged and/or pregnant right after hitting 30. Is “anti-marriage” feminism just mate-blocking by other means? Or is it sour grapes from women who spent their 20s steeped in hookup culture?
We explore:
• The hypocrisy of prominent “stay single” influencers (MJ Gray, Alex Cooper, Wizard Liz, Danielle Walter, etc.)
• Why feminism’s biggest “wins” have mostly hurt women
• The collapse in marriage rates (especially by age 30)
• Mate blocking vs. status denial
• The hollowness of modern hookup/OnlyFans culture and the return to meaning
Get ready for a spicy and honest conversation about dating, marriage, female nature, and cultural trends.
Show Notes
What happened:
* An influencer named MJ Gray branded herself as strongly anti‑marriage and anti‑kids, framing marriage as “enslavement” and something women should avoid because it primarily benefits men and the patriarchy.
* She built a following of nearly 500,000 on TikTok by creating anti-marriage content, often arguing that marriage signifies the “ownership of women” and advising women to avoid it.
* After about nine months of dating a man with no public profile, she announces an engagement in a visibly uncomfortable video titled “Yes, I’m engaged. Yes, this is awkward,” while repeatedly insisting she is “in a good situation.”
* Timestamped clip:
* She claims her stance has always included caveats: marriage can make sense if you plan to have children, share property, or live together, but otherwise it remains a harmful institution.
It turns out she is not the only influencer of the stay single movement who turned around and got married. There are other recent and prominent examples that might indicate some sort of pattern.
This comes at a time when marriage REALLY doesn’t need negative propaganda. Around 2005–2010, roughly 50–55% of adults were married; by the mid-2020s, it’s around 46–51% (e.g., 47.1% of households headed by married couples in 2024, near historic lows).
So what’s going on with women like these? Let’s explore and discuss.
MJ Gray’s Branding
MJ Gray frames herself as a supermodel billionaire (that’s her handle on YouTube)
Has 419K followers on tiktok (@texasgardenfairy)
Has 84.6K followers on Instagram
She shares her thoughts on “The Maneater Podcast”
4.9 stars and 44 reviews on spotify (for reference, Based Camp has 3.8 stars and 205 reviews)
4.9 stars and 9 reviews on Apple Podcasts (for reference, Based Camp has 4.4 stars at 153 reviews)
MJ Gray’s YouTube model is @supermodelbillionaire: https://www.youtube.com/@supermodelbillionaire
8.46K subscribers, 65 videos
Things she says:
* Men should always pay for women because…
* Men are women’s apex predator
* Women’s time is more valuable than men’s time (because their attractive and fertile years are limited)
* Engaging with men is dangerous as you could get pregnant, get an infection
* Women’s presence and attention is more valuable than men’s attention (men spend more on strip clubs and exotic dancers… though apparently she does not know about host clubs)
Other Stay-Single Hypocrites
Alex Cooper
* She is most famous for being co-host of the Call Her Daddy podcast
* She built a massive platform with frank, often casual-sex-positive advice that included heavy skepticism toward traditional marriage and long-term commitment, encouraging women to prioritize autonomy and fun over settling down.
* She faced direct roasting for “preaching anti-marriage” before getting married herself (to Matt Kaplan). Critics highlighted the shift as hypocritical given her earlier messaging.
* Just this week announced her pregnancy
Wizard Liz
* https://www.youtube.com/c/TheWizardliz
* She is known for being a life advice/self-improvement influencer
* Frequently grouped with MJ Gray in discussions of “feminist rhetoric as a placeholder” for building a following before pivoting to relationships/luxury-coded life.
* She has shared content focused on self-love, healing, and high standards that some interpreted as discouraging rushed commitments or highlighting male flaws. She got engaged/married quickly (to Landon Nickerson), faced cheating drama, and drew similar “bait-and-switch” accusations
Danielle Walter
* https://www.tiktok.com/@daniellewalter_
* She is known for being a dating/relationship TikTok influencer, and the “Carrie Bradshaw of San Francisco”
* Gained millions with dating advice, single-era relatability, and content that resonated with women navigating toxic dynamics or high standards (sometimes overlapping with anti-settling or critical-of-men vibes).
* When she entered a relationship and shared extensively about it (including a 21-part series), followers accused her of abandoning principles, hypocrisy, or shifting for a man/clout. Backlash included claims she went “all for a man” after building on single struggles.
What is Really Happening?
Anti-Marriage as Mate Blocking?
Anti-Marriage Being a Pre-Wall Phenomenon?
* MJ Gray was 30 (born August 12, 1995; turned 30 in August 2025). The engagement news broke around April 2026.
* Alex Cooper got engaged at age 31/32
* Wzard Liz got engaged around age 25 (though it ended amid cheating allegations while she was pregnant)
* Danielle Walter entered her long-term relationship around age 32 and got engaged around age 33
Anti-Marriage Being about Women Fundamentally Misunderstanding Men?
Recently trending on X: 2010 Study Shows Testosterone Boosts Fairness in Women
People were discussing a 2009 study titled Prejudice and truth about the effect of testosterone on human bargaining behaviour (2009), in which researchers found that a single dose of testosterone made women behave more fairly in a bargaining game, but simply believing one had received testosterone made people behave more unfairly, regardless of what they actually received.
Episode Transcript
Simone Collins: Hello, Malcolm. I’m excited to be speaking with you again because we have a new episode in our series Women Are Terrible because they’re at it again, Malcolm.
The women are terrible. And what happened most recently was an influencer who goes by MJ Gray. She branded herself as very strongly anti-marriage and anti-kids. She, she framed marriage as enslavement and something that women should avoid because it primarily benefits men and the patriarchy. And she built this following of almost 500,000 people on TikTok.
I’ll link to this in, in the show notes. And it was all about anti-marriage content. She often argued that marriage signifies ownership of women and she strongly advised women to avoid it.
Speaker 11: I really wish women would stop getting married. I wrote off getting married since I was a little girl. I, I put together the pieces of what marriage was and I was like, “Oh, yeah, no.” I could never trust a man, which is why I would never marry a man
Simone Collins: And then lo [00:01:00] and behold After nine months of dating a man with no public profile, she announces an engagement in a visibly uncomfortable video, which is now, she’s trying to scrub it from the internet titled Yes, I’m Engaged.
Yes, This Is Awkward. While repeatedly she insists she’s in a good situation and I, I have a somewhat salvaged part of this at least that I was able to find on the internet for you, Malcolm, if you wanna include it. But I’ll also link to it in the show notes.
Speaker: Yes, I am engaged. Yes, I am the same person who made several videos saying that I never had, never had any plans to get married, I did not wanna get married, and I did not agree with the institution of marriage.
Simone Collins: She claims her stance has always included caveats that sometimes marriage is good.
Sometimes marriage can make sense if you plan to have children or share property or live together. But otherwise, it remains a harmful institution. And of course, very abundantly in, in her content, you know, she’s “Well, having kids is the most horrifying thing. It destroys your body.” So of course, if you have kids, [00:02:00] you know, sharing property, why would you ever do that?
But so- Oh, my
Malcolm Collins: God. So your takeaway, because she watched this happen. She comes to me and she goes, “Malcolm, is feminism just an anti-woman grift?” Is it- Or is it
Simone Collins: meat blocking? That’s what I, I kind of think Well, meat
Malcolm Collins: blocking, but through that it’s a tactic that ugly women use to destroy the marriage prospects of beautiful and qualified women and that when women signal feminist ideals, they are doing it with the predominant intentionality of hurting other women.
And the women I have heard- No, I mean, so this, this is where it gets
Simone Collins: more complicated because this is a different subset, and it’s more... This is why I wanted to talk about it, because this is not the ugly feminist meat blocking and being like, “Well, we need to, you know, uh, get cats and vote.” This is not that class.
This is, this is a slutty class of women. I, I mean that in the nicest way. This is a sex positive class of women that, that, that actively wants to date that talks about dating strategy, that talks [00:03:00] about getting men to pay for you, that talks about loving sex. And yet things happen and suddenly- Did this woman talk about all that?
Dot, dot, dot. Yeah, we’re gonna get into it because it turns out That MJ is not the only influencer in the stay single movement who turned around and got married. There are other recent and, and actually quite prominent, even more prominent than MJ in, in terms of the online drama than MJ. So I want
Malcolm Collins: to explore this through a few lenses before we start.
Okay. So when you came to me and you told me this, I began to really think through it, and I was like, actually, almost everything that feminism has, quote-unquote, “won” has been a strict negative for the majority of women. Yeah. Yeah ...
whether- Yes ...
whether that is, “Hey, women, you get to be sluttier now,” and women were always like, “But I never wanted to.”
I... men are the ones- Yeah, like this was never the plan. Since when did I want to? Men wanted multiple partners. I wanted a wealthy partner, right, who’s dedicated only to me. Yeah. I’ve watched the women porn, right? I’ve, I personally like really reading, uh, romantasy mawa’s stories, [00:04:00] right? So I know what women like because I find it very enjoyable, too, and it’s always one guy, maybe two guys thirsting after them for a love triangle.
Yeah. It’s certainly not what men are into and what these women have, quote-unquote, “won.” Well, yeah, it’s not a series
Simone Collins: of one-night stands. It’s not really out there sex acts. It’s, it’s- No ... it’s quite- It’s the dark,
Malcolm Collins: brooding Duke of the North- Yeah ... who secretly has a soft spot for them. Oh, you know it.
You know it. But- Yeah ... but, so okay. So, oh, well, they won the right to work. What? How is that good for women? Yeah. That now women have to have jobs, and still raise kids, and still cook the food, ‘cause they didn’t really walk back that other stuff significantly. No, no.
Simone Collins: Now they’re just like, oh, so, work for yourself, but also sleep around with a bunch of men, but sort of, you know, in, in return for no security or long-term bonding.
And, and also you know, if you, if you ever do get married, just wait. Get, make it a [00:05:00] capstone in your life. Get everything else in place. And they’re just giving this really intense anti-marriage advice at a time when marriage really can’t afford any more negative propaganda. Between 25, or 2005 and, and, and 2010, around half of adults, like 50 to 55%, were married, and by the mid-2020s, it’s around 46 to 51%.
So, 47% of households were headed by married couples in 2024. These are near historic lows. It, it, people are just- I mean,
Malcolm Collins: have you seen the married by 30 numbers that Asmogold was sharing? Really?
Simone Collins: But yeah, the number of people getting married by 30 is,
is plummeting.
So yeah, people are putting it off. We really don’t need any more anti-marriage propaganda. Meanwhile, you have-
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, hold on. I’m just gonna go over it really quickly for fans. Yeah. So Americans married by age 30, if you go to 1975, it was 91% of women, so over nine in 10 women. Yeah. And for men it was 81%.
Today, 2025, it is 25% of women and 16% of men. [00:06:00]
Simone Collins: This is not
Malcolm Collins: great. So, th- yeah, that is terrible at this point. And women are
Simone Collins: like, “
Malcolm Collins: Marriage is slavery.” And I also wanna go into a video that ended up doing the rounds of a woman who is very, very mid got a baseball star to date her. Uh, he wanted him to come back to her place on the first date, and she ends up putting him on blast, and he didn’t even do anything wrong.
And it, it shows that the tyranny of the mids at this point.
Simone Collins: The tyranny of the mids? Right? Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. That they expect- Come on ... mil- multi-millionaire pro athletes to take them on second dates when clearly they’re just chum.
Simone Collins: Yeah, this guy was a, a, apparently a lazy 10. So that’s- As we
Malcolm Collins: point out, you know.
And now if she thinks that this is the type of guy that she can get, no, you can’t. Yeah, now, now yeah,
Simone Collins: going forward she’s going to assume that she will get a 10 to marry her because a 10 wanted to sleep with her on one of his tired nights.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Okay,
Malcolm Collins: continue, Simone.
Simone Collins: But yeah, so I, I wanna, I wanna explore these women for a [00:07:00] little bit because this is a different profile of woman.
This is not, like I said, the, you know, a bookish feminist cat lady who is just like, “I’m never gonna come into contact with men.” This is actually, as much as they’re sort of anti-men or at least anti-centering men, they actually engage a lot with men, and they’re quite attractive. At least I, I think, I think they are.
Uh, they, they, they look like mainstream filter people if, if that makes sense. You know, like Instagram models. But let’s start with MJ Gray, the, the woman in question, the, the turning point of this episode. She has 419,000 followers on TikTok. She has 84,000 followers on Instagram. She shares her thoughts on The Maneater podcast, which is, you know, her, it’s a little bit red pill woman-y, but not in that she... I think red pill women often were seen back in their day, I don’t know if they still exist, as being subservient to men, whereas she’s more like a pickup artist woman. You know, like- Mm-hmm ... being very sociopathic about her views with women.
A, an [00:08:00] example of a post from her is she’ll be like, “Well, men should always pay for women because men are women’s apex predator, and women’s time is more valuable than men.” But admittedly because they’re attractive and fertile, years are limited, which is true. And engaging with men is dangerous, as you could get pregnant or get an infection.
And women’s presence and attention is more valuable than men’s attention because men, you know, there’s this multimillion dollar stripper industry, uh, and OnlyFans industry that, that centers on women’s attention and, and time and presence. And that, you know, and it, th- this is why you should have men always pay for your dinner, that you should never go Dutch on a date.
I lo-
Malcolm Collins: I love their we need to walk back some parts of feminism here, right, guys? Th- this is clearly... We should just get whatever we want as women. Yeah
Simone Collins: you have to pay for everything, but Are you gonna tell me about this guy who got hitched to this psycho? So there’s not a whole lot known about him because it, but it’s, it’s clear that he’s- Except that he’s super rich apparently.
He’s, yeah, he’s, he’s super rich. Yeah, he, he’s [00:09:00] super rich.
Looking to find and marry a rich man just so you can live the soft life is probably the dumbest s**t I’ve ever heard
Simone Collins: And that’s kind of, it’s a pattern here. Although I, I, I mean, and she, I mean, it makes sense her, her handle, when it’s not Manny or this or whatever MJ Gray is, is, is supermodel billionaire. That’s how she frames herself on YouTube though she only has eight point, like eight, a little more than 8,000 subscribers on YouTube.
She’s pretty small on this platform. But yeah, that is the pattern with her and these other don’t center men, never get married, just enjoy yourself women. So and the most prominent example, I would say way more prominent than than MJ, is Alex Cooper. And you’ve probably never heard of her, Malcolm, but she’s super famous for being the, I guess the former co-host of the Call Her Daddy podcast.
She built this massive- Oh, yeah, I remember this one. And then a guy swept her
Malcolm Collins: off her feet.
Simone Collins: Yeah, and actually just this week, guess what she announced? Marriage? No, her [00:10:00] pregnancy. Oh, gosh. How neat. She’s, she’s now she’s pregnant. And this is, you know, after her getting super famous for s- casual sex positive advice that was very skeptical toward traditional marriage, very skeptical toward long-term commitment, encouraging women to prioritize autonomy and fun over settling down.
Now she’s pregnant, and now she’s married. And people are pointing out quite fairly that she’s hypocritical. Then there’s an- another one, Wizard Liz. She was known for being more of a life advice and self-improvement influencer, and she was really commonly grouped with people like MJ Gray in discussions of femorist rhetoric as, as a placeholder for building a following, and then just sort of jumping in from there to this luxury-coded married life, which is sort of what MJ’s doing.
Like, when I went to her, her TikTok profile more recently, it’s all “Oh, I’m shopping in France, and here’s my fancy hotel room.” And so they, I guess they’re just using it as “I don’t need men. I’m super hot. I’m super sexy.” And then that’s their hook, I guess, to [00:11:00] try to get- No, hold
Malcolm Collins: on. We, we actually even had this within our own community, okay?
So- We did? If you look at the wider online community that we’re a part of, our fourth most overlapped channel by the way which you know but our fans w- probably don’t know from today uh, is, is a woman who- Ah ... uh, really promoted the ideas of a kink lifestyle, a 24/7 BDSM- Oh, her ... uh, daddy dom little girl, and now she’s in a trad cath relationship.
Simone Collins: She is? I haven’t followed, I haven’t kept up with her. Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: Shoe0nHead married a traditional Catholic guy. Oh,
Simone Collins: Shoe0nHead. Shoe0nHead. I thought you were talking about the other one who’s more, way more- No,
Malcolm Collins: Shoe0nHead is our fourth most overlapped channel- Really? ... and she promoted all of this. Oh, you thought the other kink influencer.
No, she’s not overlapped with us. Shoe0nHead is- Yeah, she,
Simone Collins: she’s very boring. Yeah, yeah, okay. Yeah, Shoe0nHead’s very entertaining. Come on, of
Malcolm Collins: course
Simone Collins: Shoe0nHead,
Malcolm Collins: Woke up, you know. We’ll be getting videos from- I guess you’re right. I didn’t
Simone Collins: even think about that. But I don’t think Shoe0nHead... W- was she ever...
See, I think she was, like, open about her kink, but she was never also [00:12:00] BDSM people are, like, surprisingly I don’t know, I wanna say lovey-dovey and romantic in their relationships, you know? They’re- ... they’re not like, “I’m gonna have one-night stands.” You can’t, you can’t be in like, a BDSM relationship and do one-night stands, because you need weeks just to hammer out the, the gear and, and, and get all the accoutrement and, and work out your agreements and the procedure.
Mm-hmm. I mean, it’s just, it, it’s like the D&D campaign. You can’t just, just one night stand it and then switch between people all the time. You’d have to like, buy new outfits and stuff. It would be too tedious. But yeah, good point. Yeah ... Wizard Liz though, she, she was- Shoe, but I think
Malcolm Collins: that this is all part of a wider thing where if you’re a woman and you’re just trying to live your best life, and I like including Shoe0nHead in this category because Shoe0nHead, I do not think is somebody, uh, there’s a small number of our audience who doesn’t like her, but the vast majority generally assume the best of Kami Mommy.
Oh, yeah ... and she, like me I used to be, like, a manslut, right? I was just in an environment where I hadn’t [00:13:00] heard a compelling argument that it was a stupid way to live your life, right? Uh, because- Yeah ... frankly the way conservatives of the last generation made their arguments was f*****g terrible.
Yeah. Yeah ... it simply was an awful seller. Well, and I think most of us
Simone Collins: grew up seeing our boomer parents, like millennials, saw their boomer parents’ marriages and were like, “Well, this is, this is mediocre.” Mm-hmm. “I’m not, I’m not interested in whatever this is. This is, this is
Malcolm Collins: bad.” Whatever the boomers did is not what I wanna do, right?
Simone Collins: Exactly. So I’m like, yeah. Exactly,
Malcolm Collins: so I don’t blame you. You were telling me- And I was...
Simone Collins: No, I was totally, I mean, rule it out. But the I’m never gonna get married, I’m just gonna s- have, you know, s- like s- sleep with someone and fall in love and have my heart broken and then just move on and never do it again.
You know, I’m, I’m not above this, and I just find that dynamic to be very interesting
Malcolm Collins: Yeah because- but the, the reason I’m, I’m saying this is a lot of these women likely just were not aware how awesome marriage is. They get swept up, as women do- Yeah ... in online communities where everyone’s saying the same thing.
They likely had no evoked set for what a [00:14:00] positive relationship in a marriage looks like, because where were they going to see it? Yeah. Think about our progressive friends who are, like, live in Manhattan and stuff like that. Yeah. They
have
f*****g terrible marriages. Uh, even ones who are, like, just a generation above us, their marriages are so bad, these weird polyamory marriages they, they’re like...
It’s, it’s, it’s shocking to me. And when I say bad, I’m not saying they’re bad because they’re polyamorous. I’m saying that they often don’t seem to really like each other that much or really working together that much. And they seem like partners who uh, they seem like coworkers really is, is sort of the vibe I get from them, right?
They’re not actively anti- They’re not like boomers where it’s like they obviously hate each other. But they don’t seem to really get it. And then I look at our friend group of our generation, right? Who’s all in the suburbs and everything like that, and they all seem to just be loving it, like marriage is the best thing ever.
And, uh, yeah. It’s, it’s, it’s been very, [00:15:00] uh, which, uh, people may not know this, but our actual friend group of marrieds, uh, is either... I, I will say for the Latin friends we have that get married it’s, it’s often not as good. Because, uh, very often, for whatever reason in Latin American culture in the United States men get married to women and then use them as a source of income and the, it’s, it’s, sort of comes across as, as Latin women often marry down.
I mean, at least they’re getting married and having kids, but you know, it is something I’ve noticed.
Simone Collins: No, it’s just anecdotally more than we would like to see, I think. Yeah,
Malcolm Collins: more than we would like to see. Uh, and then the other place where I see this is in my, uh, or our Jewish friend group.
We have a big, you know, Orthodox Jewish friend group. And their marriages are usually really rock solid. The younger ones. Oh, super rock solid. The
Simone Collins: older ones- Yeah, I was like, not that- Not as much ... no. No, they’re super solid. Yeah. Yeah. But yeah, so they’re, so the... Yeah, sorry, where was I? Wizard Liz.
Wizard Liz is a little different because she went from the whole like, oh let’s, you know, be liberated and free to really quickly getting married and then getting pregnant, but then [00:16:00] divorcing before even, I think, having her, her first baby because of cheating allegations. So that didn’t work out for her.
But then there’s Danielle Walter. Uh, Danielle Walter was known, you might have heard of her she was the Carrie Bradshaw of San Francisco, and she did a lot of dating confessionals essentially- Mm-hmm ... on TikTok and got really famous for that. She had millions of followers who, who were into her single era, woman ability, and this whole Sort of modern single woman thing.
But then she did this, and I, I’ve watched multiple YouTube videos, like going over this very, I guess you could say cringey 21-part series where she debuted her boyfriend. Like she just teased it to high heaven. And then- Was this, was this the woman who was on the Call Her Daddy? No. This is, this is a dif- this is, we’re on number two now.
This is yet another. Yes. Yes. So yeah, I, first I was talking about the now just suddenly pregnant Alex Cooper from Call Her Daddy, then there was Wizard Liz, and now we’re on Danielle Walter. And [00:17:00] what’s happened with her is that she, after debuting her boyfriend, then she, she got... I think she’s married now.
And part of what I think might be happening when I look at all these women, with the exception of Wizard Liz, is guess what happened right before they suddenly pivoted and got serious about long-term committed relationships? They became famous? No. They hit 30? Yes. Ah. MJ, MJ Ray, she was 30. The, the engagement news broke right as she hit the wall.
Alex Cooper got engaged at 31, 32. Wizard Liz, exception here, 25, but now she’s divorced again, back on the market. And then Danielle Walter got- Oh. Oh, oh, oh, oh ... like the moment they debut it,
Malcolm Collins: it’s- To add to it, wasn’t in your original list, how old was she on head when she got engaged? 32.
Simone Collins: I... No way. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: Probably met him around 30.
Simone Collins: So, yeah, maybe one thing here is that like women of our modern [00:18:00] era like... Oh my gosh. I don’t know what’s going on with him. Oh, poor baby.
Hold on. Give me one moment here. All right. Hey,
hey, hey. They, they... Maybe the new norm is you’re like basically “I’ll never get married and I’m gonna be an independent woman,” and then you hit the wall, and then it, like you just suddenly have you f- you get God, you know?
And if there’s some way that we could like, ooh, head off...
I think
it’s that room’s really
hot maybe. Or-
Malcolm Collins: Well, it’s his first summer.
Simone Collins: It is, but he’s not into it.
Malcolm Collins: I’m not into it, okay? Our whole family isn’t into it.
Simone Collins: We, we don’t like..
Anyway m- maybe if there’s some way we can head this off, it would involve maybe our like just telling people like, “Look, this is the pattern. This happens to everyone. Just ignore the instincts telling you this.” Well,
Malcolm Collins: [00:19:00] it’s like we all get warned that puberty is coming- Yes ... and nobody warns that your 30s are coming, right?
Yeah. You
Simone Collins: know,
Malcolm Collins: everyone’s “Well, you need to be preparing. You need to figure out how to talk to girls. You need to get your rizz on.” People didn’t know I got rizz, okay? I, no, but I’m joking here. I do not have rizz apparently, uh, as, as our audience has, has made clear to me, right? So I, I, talking to women I’m just no good.
But uh, t- uh, functionally I am though, obviously. It’s just, it doesn’t look like what people think it looks like. Uh- Yeah, I don’t, I don’t know if anyone really knows what- How do we get women... I mean, I think it’s just your, your biology changes. Here’s the way I would fix this, okay? Oh, but I, I
Simone Collins: have to ask, though.
Is it also not just some form of mate blocking behavior? There’s a big game of musical chairs taking place when women are in their 20s, and what many women do as a t- a defensive tactic, maybe also to inflate their sense of value, is to be like, you know, the [00:20:00] one thing that you talk about in, when you give relationship advice is women, stop doing this whole thing where you act unimpressed by everything.
You’re like, “Oh, this restaurant isn’t really that impressive.” They just wanna neg men- Oh, I freaking hate women who do this ... and it’s really unattractive. But women do that- It’s so common ... it’s very pervasive. This could be a version of it, of “Oh, I don’t ever wanna get married. I don’t...” Because they’re trying to seem more valuable than they are, because what they really want is for men to be like, “Oh, then I, I must have her, because she can- she’s unachievable.”
You know, that kind of thing? It’s maybe this is that. Maybe it’s a competitive strategy. It’s not also mate blocking. It doesn’t work quite that way with men.
Malcolm Collins: Guys don’t go for that. I know, it works...
Simone Collins: Well, but think about it. So men send dick pics to women because they’re like, “What would I like? Oh, I know.”
Oh, so they try to be the cold Duke of the North? Yes. I think maybe that might be part of it, is it, this is women trying to be the cold Duke of the North, and what men are like-
Malcolm Collins: I’m not interested in this ... “Will you
Simone Collins: send me a picture of your tits, please?” “Let, let me inspire you by this picture of my [00:21:00] dongle.”
You know, that is, that is- So,
Malcolm Collins: okay. So here is- We’re talking past each other, essentially ... I think is a way around this culturally speaking, right? Which is we can go out there and, uh, when our kids are growing up, when we’re teaching them about puberty, puberty should be taught as a package with you’re gonna want to get married at later in life too.
Yeah. So when we’re telling them, “You’re going to change how you feel,” we make it very salient, “And this will happen again later. So any preparations you make for this change should also include preparations for the secondary change.”
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, possibly. Maybe even forcing them to watch Blippi when they’re teens to be like, “Hey, how do you like this?
How do you like it? You wanna watch more?” Mm. And then be like, “Hey, this is how you’re gonna feel about your life as a playboy, world traveling 20-something when you turn 30.” Maybe something like that. Or if you actually are willing to be intellectually honest with yourself- Right ... and emotionally honest with yourself.
I don’t know. I’m, I’m [00:22:00] not sure. But I think more importantly, we also need to hear- Hold on, I’m gonna break this down.
Malcolm Collins: Let’s not leave this at an I’m not sure. Let’s think through it. Because, uh, I think we see this present in different ways. Okay. Uh, in Siwanhead’s case, for example, I do not think it was mate blocking.
I think she lived in a society where this was normal and, uh, or you could even think me promoting these values. Mm. Why didn’t I promote feminist values? It’s because I wanted to sleep with women, right? Mm-hmm. And it got that for me. Oh yeah, abortion’s the best, right? Oh yeah, you know, sleeping around, while it makes you feel good, it makes me feel good.
How could it be morally negative, right? Yeah. Oh yeah, you know, uh, it, it, it, it achieved what I wanted in the moment, right? So, uh, and what everyone in my society told me I was good and what seemed good when I saw through it because, you know, clearly whatever the boomers is doing isn’t working and the religious people just shout, “Read the Bible” and I’m like, but a lot of those stories don’t compute.
I did. There’s a lot of
Simone Collins: sex
in there.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, a- and [00:23:00] slavery. You know, I’m like, “You, you guys aren’t pro-slavery, right?” Now obviously as an adult I’ve gone back to the Bible and I find good moral guidance in it. Mm. But as a kid when somebody just shouts at you, “Read the Bible” and you’re like aware that the Bible’s like pro-genocide and slavery in sections, you’re like, well, selling your daughter, you know, well, maybe not every...
Like, how do I know that this marriage stuff in the Bible sh- I, I, I shouldn’t take the same way as I take the selling your daughter into slavery stuff in the Bible, right? Mm-hmm. Like presumably that’s not applicable anymore, right? And they, you know, frankly I didn’t hear good answers back then.
Now I can give you a great answer today. Uh, you watch our track series, you watch any of our religious episodes, you’ll find good answers. But the conservatives of the last generation, things sucked at, at, at basically conveying a salient message.
Simone Collins: Yeah. So combine, combine that conservative message with how bad boomer, like our parents and Gen X marriages were, which is oh my God, I [00:24:00] don’t want that, plus this mismatch between male and female desired love language.
It’s like men just want the tit pics and women just want the Duke of the North and we don’t know how to give this to each other because we, we are pretty different in the things that turn us on, like on average as men and women. And then with different life stages just being- The, you being rewarded by different things at different periods of your life, and it being very hard to model that even within yourself and anticipate that.
I think there’s an additional cultural layer on top of this, which is that we are in the middle of a, of a realization, a collective realization that the free sex OnlyFans, sleep around with people era. And we’ve talked about this. Remember we talked about how swipe-based dating and hookup culture radicalized women- Mm-hmm
but also made them pretty miserable. And it’s even showing up in very popular media. There’s very little event media left, but one of the few shows that’s left is Euphoria. And I’ve been watching Season 3, and a [00:25:00] really major recurring theme of it is the Bible and God and religion. What? And the other recurring theme is women in sex work.
So the main character is working for this kingpin of strip clubs and, and kind of drugs. Another main character is an OnlyFans model. Another main character is an agent exploiting OnlyFans models. So, it’s just, it’s kind of all about sex and hookup culture. Another one is a sugar baby- Mm-hmm
for a wealthy man who likes to wrap her up in cellophane . And it- To wrap her up in cellophane? ... it’s all just kind of like... It’s just a, like a fetish thing, you know? I, I can’t remember what the name for it is, but, like- Yeah, I’ve seen it. Yeah, I think someone actually- I, I don’t understand anything about this fetish
I think actually famously very recently, an OnlyFans model has just been convicted of negligent homicide for accidentally killing one of her followers by wrapping him up in cellophane. So guys, be careful. Uh, it’s not safe. Wait, so he, he asked her to wrap
Malcolm Collins: him up. He didn’t wrap her up. [00:26:00]
Simone Collins: Yeah. She wrapped him up, and now she’s in trouble because he died.
Uh, ‘cause don’t do that . It’s not safe. Uh- That makes
Malcolm Collins: me sad for her, actually. I know.
Simone Collins: She was just trying to do her job, you know what I mean? Uh- Yeah. The guy presumably was- He asked for it ... at least partially aware of the risk. For, you, you, one hopes, but I don’t know. Okay? Anyway, the big theme is that.
And actually it begins with one of the main character, the main character is, is running drugs, but stops. She sort of finds herself in the middle of the Texan countryside, and is, is, is, uh, she sleeps in a barn and wakes up to this, this homeschooling- I have, I have, I need
Octavian: a little more things
Simone Collins: here.
He has more swords that he wishes to show. She shows up at this homeschooling Texan family, like sleeps in their barn, but like they just bring her milk in the morning. They’re like, “Hey, why don’t you just join us for breakfast?” And she sits around and they have family prayers. And she, they drop her off closer to a road, and so she’s able to get on her way.
And it just sits with her [00:27:00] for l- the longest time of “Man, like I-” I think they kind of get it.
Speaker 2: We wanna thank you, Lord Jesus Christ, for giving us our daily bread and forgiving us our trespasses. Let me help you get your plate, sweetie. Here, let me get this first, Dad. This is our address. Will you be sure to send the article when it’s in the paper? Uh, yeah, as long as the commies at college don’t censor it.
Speaker 3: You’re doing the Lord’s work. Thank you. I’d trade spots with you in a heartbeat Bye
Simone Collins: These offline teens, this, this big family of six kids, like homeschooling and living on our farm, like they kind of have it made. I think I’m living my life wrong. And so she starts reading the Bible and she starts thinking about God and being like, “I think I’m religious.”
Sitting in churches. And the last scene I just watched last night from the [00:28:00] latest episode, there’s a burning bush. They’re really leaning into it. They’re like... and it... That was... So a major theme of it, and I think this is representative of where collectively we are in society, is oh my God, this hookup culture, OnlyFans women not getting married, sugar baby, everything’s transactional world is not rewarding.
We’re not happy. We’re not thriving. This is really bad. We need to get God again. And the people who never left God are like the happiest and the only ones who are doing okay right now. So I think there’s this additional layer. The communication layer, the- No, I, I
Malcolm Collins: actually disagree with that. Really? I’m gonna push back.
Actually- Okay ... what I think is the people who seem to be doing the best are the secular people who came to religion through logic. The people who are doing the second-best are the ones who always had religion, but typically the way that they practice their religion is a little less optimal for actually dealing with the crises of our time.
If you’re
Simone Collins: homeschooling on a Texan ranch in the middle of nowhere, you’re one of those, “I came to this very thoughtfully.”
Malcolm Collins: Right, but there are some people who are [00:29:00] still holds out from like the old evangelical communities and stuff like that. Sure. Yeah. And they just seem to be just broadly unprepared to interact with the modern world in a meaningful way.
Yeah.
Simone Collins: Well, as soon as they interact with the modern world, they crash and burn because they’re not resilient to it, as we talked about extensively. Yeah, they’re not resilient.
Malcolm Collins: It’s... And you, you sort of have to go through, you know, uh, to an ex- or have some, some members of your community that have fully gone through it understand why it was tempting and understand why you failed to convince them in the past to build better arguments for the next generation.
Yeah. If you were convinced by the, you know, “Just read the Bible” argument, your kids are gonna be just as susceptible because you don’t know why that argument may not appeal to somebody, right? Yeah. And, and I think that, uh, this show shows how many people come to this, is they see, “Oh, like this isn’t working.
This old way of doing things is working.” But-
Simone Collins: Yeah, and to be fair, all these characters were not raised in like religious contexts. They were raised in like our modern mainstream [00:30:00] urban lifestyle. What I’m
Malcolm Collins: interested to see is what is the online chatter about this direction the show is going. Can you ask an AI for a sentiment analysis?
Simone Collins: No, so the, no, what, what is, what is being said in the media is “Oh my God, suddenly MAGA loves Euphoria because...” for these reasons, you know? And, and also I think the S- Sy- Sydney Sweeney is the one who’s big on OnlyFans in this- Mm-hmm ... in the series, the, who’s famous for the jeans campaign who’s, you know, sort of like become this icon.
We all like Sydney
Malcolm Collins: Sweeney from the jeans interview. Yeah.
Simone Collins: Didn’t this... It was a com- it was a commercial. It was a, an ad campaign.
Speaker 4: I just wanted to give you the opportunity to deal with a passive aggressive accusation disguised as a question
Speaker 5: if your career brought you here, of what use was it?
Simone Collins: No,
Malcolm Collins: no, but there’s a famous interview [00:31:00] she did afterwards where like- Oh, with the- Do you know the- Yeah,
Simone Collins: the,
Malcolm Collins: the...
Simone Collins: Yes, yes. Yeah And she’s just like- so now, yeah, like the discourse is oh, and then a lot of people are trying to argue that the creator of Euphoria isn’t actually like turning to God and pro-MAGA or anything it’s just that he likes to troll people.
But there’s literally portions of like little montages of the Sydney Sweeney OnlyFans model character being interviewed for example. She like has her rise on the internet, you know, getting internet famous, and people are like, “Oh, are you a Democrat?” And she’s “I’m not retarded.” So- Yeah, no, it’s, it’s very...
It... Yes, the right apr- the right is enjoying season three. I- Wait,
Malcolm Collins: she says this in character in the show?
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yes. Oh my God. It’s, it’s a great clip. It’s fantastic. They, they show this there’s the montage and it’s also her being “I just think, you know, women want to be able to be at home and you know, be wives and be-” I
Octavian: want you to come back and tell, and tell me more.
I learned that when you add vinegar [00:32:00] and bacon soda together they can create a new thing.
Simone Collins: Baking soda.
Octavian: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Baking soda. It
Octavian: kind of like fizzes if you’re really close.
Simone Collins: We should do that. We’ll do that tonight.
Octavian: But if you did it a lot, then it would be like a bottle and put all of the vinegar you have in that bottle, and it can create a big fizz. Like this big.
Simone Collins: That big, huh?
Yeah. I wanna get back to the original question This is, uh, our un- unofficial endorsement of Science Max as a YouTube channel for kids. I wanna get
Malcolm Collins: back to the original question here.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Oh,
Malcolm Collins: wait, are these two different characters in the show? The one who’s a Sydney Sweeney character and the one who’s finding God?
Simone Collins: Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: They’re different characters. So multiple characters are moving in this direction, right? No, that’s ...
Simone Collins: What I’m trying to say, yes, is a major, major theme of this extremely popular public discourse show is finding God and finding the hollowness in, in sex work in general.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Okay, and calling it euphoria.
Wow, that’s, uh-
Simone Collins: Yeah ... on the nose. It’s great. No, and it ... Well, and this is the [00:33:00] third season of it. I actually couldn’t stomach the first two. I like the third one for whatever reason. But- Maybe ‘cause now it’s for
Malcolm Collins: conservatives. Anyway, your point. So hold on. I wanna get to the question of, while I don’t think for sure that it was genuinely mate blocking behavior- Yeah
did mate blocking motivate the rise of this ideology, right?
Simone Collins: Yeah, because ... Well, but I, here’s where I get confused, is it made sense to your early ... your earliest point was you were making the assumption that these were ugly women. Whereas these are hot women who date and have a lot of sex. So it’s
They don’t ... It’s not like they have trouble finding men. But that doesn’t mean that mean, popular girls don’t mate block. I mean, a, a, a major theme of pop- popular, hot, mean girls is mate blocking. So I don’t know. What, what, what is your take?
Malcolm Collins: So my take is, is that it partially likely led to it.
So, there was certainly, if you look at the early feminists, they were very often vile habergashes or whatever you wanna call them, right? Uh, fairly- A [00:34:00] haberdashery
Simone Collins: is where you buy buttons and ribbons. I don’t- I
Malcolm Collins: don’t even know. Whatever you wanna call them. Okay. Swamp things. Uh, trying to
I, I think that there’s a ... More than mate blocking, I think a lot of it was women who failed out of marriage marketplaces or failed to get the type of guy they thought they deserved and then wanted to r- increase the status of unattached women. I think that was more of what motivated it, right? They failed to achieve what they felt they deserved to achieve given their perceived self-status, which increased as a problem as women got access to easier and easier sex.
And then they, uh, looked at the world, this terrible and unfair world and they said, “Actually, I’m not low status. It is not l- “ And as the proportion of women who needed to believe this delusion increased and as men realized they could utilize this to [00:35:00] gain sexual access to women more easily it spread.
I think while it would be- Convenient for our narrative if it was genuine mate blocking. I think it was more about women not admitting their genuine low status in society and trying to normalize it.
‘ Cause I think that’s a stronger everyday drive for women. And then they have to do that uh, you know... What’s, what’s the word here?
Simone Collins: Or so I mean, if I were to reframe, it’s kind of like a sour grapes thing. But then as soon as they get the opportunity they’re like, “Oh, I want it and I’m gonna take it.”
They’re gonna pretend that they’re happy with their lot. I mean, could it, could it be also that these, Okay, these are, these are presumably top-tier women, right? They, they are, they are sleeping with the, the best men, but they’re also realizing that the best men are not willing to commit to long-term relationships, because a very common dynamic in modern dating markets is there’s no [00:36:00] reason for a man who’s an eight, nine, or 10 to settle down.
Because they have access to all the range of women. Like, why would they- Yeah. Well, unless they like literally- And say, “Oh, well” ...
Malcolm Collins: sit down and think
Simone Collins: their way out of
Malcolm Collins: it like I did. Yeah.
Simone Collins: Right? Yeah. Because that’s very unusual, right? So unless you’re like a, a, a good Christian man or you’re smart and like really, really disciplined.
Or I mean, I think what also helped for you is you, you were so slutty in your youth that like you got it out of your system. So unless you’ve done all, one of those things you’re, you’re, you’re not gonna commit. You know, I always wanted a
Malcolm Collins: wife. Uh, for my brother and I-
Simone Collins: Yeah, it was your identity ... it was inherent
Malcolm Collins: that we wanted wives.
That was like- It is also like
Simone Collins: in your DNA. Like you come from a long line of romantic men. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: For me it was always about the wife and kids. Uh, especially a good wife. And so, uh, it, I mean it’s interesting for me to reflect on, ‘cause it doesn’t just require like intellect and a sober mind.
‘Cause recently we were talking to one of our friends. And this friend I consider to be of the highest [00:37:00] intellectual caliber, highest ability to sit down and think through things, and yet he is unmarried, doesn’t have kids, and doesn’t seem to have a strong desire to get married even though I have tried to logic it through with him.
And why can’t he see it? Why can’t he sit down and be like, “Obviously this is stupid”? It’s not that he hates his ancestors, ‘cause he’s Jewish and he doesn’t seem to be like actively antisemitic or anything like that. I think it’s just he is in an environment But I was able to break out of that environment.
That’s the thing. I was in an environment that was as progressive as
Simone Collins: any- But what I’m saying is you’re very unusual, and maybe what’s happening is these... You already talked to your women, are like, “Oh my God, this is just never gonna happen. I need to embrace that I have to be like them.” And this is actually a common theme in discourse.
People are like, “Oh, women think that they have to be like men, that they have to sleep [00:38:00] around like men and enjoy one-night stands like men.” And that is a very Call Her Daddy theme, where they really act like they enjoy sex the same way that men enjoy sex. At least that’s kind of how I feel about it when I see- consume that content.
I’m like, “Oh,” this is a very... This, this looks like a woman trying so hard to pretend that she has male sexuality, and I’m not totally buying it. And so as soon, as soon as they, this rat floundering in the ocean trying to survive on the floating board, finds a lifeboat, it jumps onto it, ‘cause it’s like, “Oh, my God.”
Yeah. “I didn’t know this could happen, but it’s happening.” So I think maybe that’s, that’s another big factor here. Do you think so?
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, I think that these women who... No, the, the, the women- No ... who are out there saying marriage is terrible are really just trying to make themselves feel good. I really think that’s the case.
Well, yeah,
Simone Collins: but, but w- wait. You can say it, you can word it as feel good. I’m wording it as feel better in an environment where they feel like they really just... Marr- [00:39:00] a, a marriage that’s committed won’t work for them. And keep in mind case in point, uh, in, in my, in favor of my theory is Wizard Liz, right?
She was like, “Oh, I’m gonna be all independent,” and then she had a chance to get married, was so stoked about it, husband cheats on her. So she kind of, uh, feeds into actually the narrative ultimately of no, you as a woman if you’re trying to marry a high-value man, even if you’re a high-value woman, can’t have that dream.
Well, I mean, if you’re
Malcolm Collins: a woman and you marry a guy who’s much higher value than you, of course he’s gonna cheat on you, right? Like- I know. She should’ve just- How did we as society forget that? I thought that that was- I know,
Simone Collins: I know ... that’s just- It was maybe on the unmentioned thing.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, to actually freak out about a high-value guy cheating on you is kind of...
Look, I get we’re, morality, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But also be f*****g realistic. Every king throughout history, almost every wealthy person throughout history has done this, right?
You... A- and, and worse, these people often come from progressive environments where [00:40:00] this is way more normalized.
They abandoned all of the social structure that was meant to punish the guy for doing this. Now he can just marry you but younger because you decided to freak out because he was sleeping with another woman. Oh. Again, I’m not pro cheating. I’m just being realistic here. When people are like, “Can you believe that Arnold Schwarzenegger cheat?”
I’m like, “Yeah, I can believe that.” People like, “Can you...” How, how do these... This is, this is a South Park scene.
Speaker 7: Why are rich, successful men suddenly going out and trying to have sex with lots of women and have perfectly good wives at home? I want answers. We believe that it may be an outbreak of sex addiction, sir. Of course, we all know the normal, healthy male thinks only of sex occasionally and has no desire for sex with multiple partners.
That’s right. Of course. But what about love? How could tons of fame and money make you forget about love?
Malcolm Collins: Why do these rich and famous men keep sleeping with other women? Like- [00:41:00] Ugh. And of course, if you don’t have a lot of kids yet, right? Like now the idea of cheating on Simone doesn’t make a lot of sense for me.
It’s just not worth my time because I’ve got five kids, and we’re doing a new one every year. Cheating would only slow that down. Maybe most people aren’t as psychotically, like... I mean, cheating I guess would always just be a ne- negative for most people, but, ugh, uh, my, my thought here is even from a pleasure standpoint, it’s just a waste of f*****g time at this point.
And I like the- I think cheating has a lot more
Simone Collins: to do with people who don’t have a clear objective function in their lives.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah.
Simone Collins: And it’s not actually a- even necessarily about sexual gratification. It’s more about wanting to feel desired and special and/or to chase after new relationship energy, which is its own special flavor of high.
And if you don’t have a stronger mooring point, like a thing that you’re trying to fight for in life like I’m going to, you know, promote human flourishing, I’m gonna serve God, I’m gonna take [00:42:00] people to the stars, whatever it, it’s gonna be, right? Then it is going to be very appealing if suddenly someone starts giving you a bunch of attention, and there’s secrets, and you get to sneak around.
And it’s, it’s like the hide and seek plus sex. Who, who wouldn’t love that? So I think that might have something to do with it. I, I, I don’t really know of people who’ve had very prominent cheating scandals who also, in our modern day and age, who also have extremely strong, Mm-hmm. Oh, never mind. I take that
Malcolm Collins: back.
Wait, wait. What? Sorry, I, I missed the point. No. Nope, never mind. I just, I
Simone Collins: just- Wait, no, go back. What was it? Never mind. I th- I, I had a, I had a hypothesis that if a man had a strong objective function, he wouldn’t desire multiple female partners. Oh, and then you remembered
Malcolm Collins: Elon existed? Yes.
Simone Collins: Whoops. I was wrong.
Malcolm Collins: But I think it’s a strong obj- objective function plus naltrexone. I cannot, Opioid agonists are the f*****g [00:43:00] bomb, right? That is, if, if, if I... I would even work this into our religious practices, right? Like- Yeah ... for future generations and stuff like this. I think constantly he wouldn’t do it if he was on naltrexone.
He’d be so much more focused and efficient.
Simone Collins: My God, he would stop posting on X. He’d stop posting
Malcolm Collins: on X. He would. He’d stop all of the other drugs. He’d stop sleeping around. He’d just be focused on his mission.
Simone Collins: Oh my God.
Malcolm Collins: It is the true wonder drug.
Simone Collins: The, yes, the drug to rule them all, Naltrexone. Okay. Well, there you go. I don’t know if I have anything more to say on this, but I find it very interesting. And women are terrible, so I hope you’ve enjoyed that. Yes. And
Malcolm Collins: our fans like the women are terrible. If we get a Simone plushie, we’ll have it squeeze and it’ll say- Oh, yeah.
Squeeze
Simone Collins: and it says, “A woman, women
Malcolm Collins: are terrible.” Women
Simone Collins: are [00:44:00] terrible.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. With my fake woman wife who’s, uh, like hormonally not totally female because of hormones. Who takes the
Simone Collins: same hormones as a trans woman.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yeah. So you- Great ... can see through the nonsense. I’m really selling guys a false bill of goods.
They’ll never get a woman like Simone. Because she’s- You’re out there. Out there. No, we have fans who are definitely seem to be as good as you. So, and for people who are unaware, of our, like while only 10% of our, like regular watchers are women-
Ironically, the sound dropped out here due to baby noises, but I was saying around forty to fifty percent of our most dedicated viewers, or at least the ones who are like subscribed on Patreon and reach out regularly, are women
Malcolm Collins: Of them are already married, I’ll be honest about that. You know, sane women get picked up pretty young, so. But not all of them are. Some of them are still dating.
Simone Collins: No, actually, a lot of them are, are single and available and interested, so. Oh, really? And there are people who have met who are like [00:45:00] actively talking and potentially romantically involved in our Discord server, so it, it happens.
Malcolm Collins: Oh, we get a marriage from our Discord server?
Simone Collins: No marriage yet. I’m just saying. There, things are starting.
Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I know some as well, so I’m excited about this. Well, what I have found is that the guys who are like a base camp or really Malcolm and Simone, like pragmatist guy, like devotees they make really good partners for women.
It’s what women basically tell me. They’re like, “I started...” The, we’ve had multiple people who have become fans of our show because they started dating a guy who was like really devoted to like our wider philosophical view of reality, and they’re like, “Yeah, it makes for really good boyfriends and husbands.”
Simone Collins: Well, a- I think that’s, uh, largely also because a lot of guys who follow base camp start dating like progressive women who are very unhappy, like seeing therapists, like active anxiety problems, et cetera. Like I’ve, I’ve seen this in, in our comments, like on, on Patreon and Substack and stuff.
We’re like, “Well, what do I do about them?” [00:46:00] And, you know, we’re like, “Well, hey, try to, you know, find their core values. Try to help them, you know, improve their lives, like actually get over their anxiety.” And I think it’s unusual for content creators to be like, “Oh, don’t dump your girlfriend. Do what her...
Do for her what therapists are failing to do. Like actually give her a mooring point in her life and a reason to not be... You know, to overcome her anxiety and all these things. Make her a better person, and then see if she is worth it for you.” So it makes sense. But anyway, I’m gonna- Love you ... blow a- Excited
Malcolm Collins: for pasta with pesto tonight.
See if we have some ravioli. If we don’t, I don’t care because I got pre-grated fresh Parmesan, not the sandy type from a can which just makes everything taste fantastic.
Simone Collins: I for one love grated cardboard, so I will just keep eating it.
Malcolm Collins: And good topic by the way. Oh, we didn’t end up going over that woman who was mad about the, the baseball star, You did.
You, you’ve told me everything I need to know. It w- it basically just shows that [00:47:00] yeah, the mids have had their brains cooked and they need to not feel bad.
I think so much of this female behavior is not about mate blocking and is about not accepting their own low status in society.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Absolutely.
Yeah. Good. True. All right. Love you.
Malcolm Collins: Love you. Bye. I’ll just ask. Will you be making the hot dogs for your parents
Simone Collins: anyway? I mean, I have them opened and they’re thawed, so it’s a tonight or tomorrow night thing. But I can do them tomorrow night with french fries, and then just pesto pasta tonight. Oh yeah,
Malcolm Collins: I would prefer that. Tomorrow night with french fries.
Ooh, and we could do actual deep-fried french fries again. I’m just gonna air fry them. Okay. That works for me too. We can see how good you can make them air fried.
Simone Collins: Yeah. ‘
Malcolm Collins: Cause
we never really tried to get that perfect.
Simone Collins: Yeah, and now’s the time ‘cause we... Well, not we, you got that air fryer from your late mother, and it’s really fancy, and it does things.
Malcolm Collins: It- but I was gonna ask you, [00:48:00] for the... We’re just doing pasta with pesto tonight. Let’s do some of the ravioli.
Simone Collins: What
Malcolm Collins: ravioli? Do we not have any in the fridge anymore?
Simone Collins: I’ll check. If we have some, I will give it to you. ‘Cause I don’t
Malcolm Collins: think I ate all of it last time. I think we have a serving or two left. We might have some
Simone Collins: squares.
Yeah, I have a lot of little things- All right ... squirreled away. So I will...
Ah. You. You. You wanna bite off my finger. You’re a little velociraptor. What are you doing? My
God. Okay,
Malcolm Collins: pulling
Simone Collins: up my notes,
Malcolm Collins: and... Oh,
I see. I
love the documentarian being like, “Well, you’re not a psychologist.” I’m like-
Can I- I mean, I am a psychologist
find out that I am.
She’s “Do you mean you have a degree?”
Simone Collins: I’m like, “Yes, I have a degree.” Yeah, yeah. She’s “Yeah, but where’s your degree?” And you’re like, “It’s... I have
a degree in psychology and neuroscience from the University of San Diego.” I don’t think you even said that. You didn’t even like... I didn’t [00:49:00] even
Malcolm Collins: flex
Simone Collins: on it like one of
Malcolm Collins: the- Yeah
best psychology degrees in the world, right? Like- Yeah.
Simone Collins: No. Like, why, why did you? What? You know what? That’s great. You’ve, you’ve, you’ve matured. You’re not even flexing anymore. You’re just- I still flex ... speaking, speaking from your position of quiet strength. Oh my
Malcolm Collins: God. Okay, so I’ve gotta tell our fans about this, ‘cause this has been so weird for me.
So I do these biweekly streams with Leaflet now that I really enjoy. She’s... I consider her one of my best friends these days. She is just such a joy to talk with. She’s so
Simone Collins: smart. Yeah. She’s an amazing person ... I don’t get stressed
Malcolm Collins: about interacting with her like I do with normal humans, which is fantastic for me.
So it’s been just really fun to have a genuine nerdy friend I can party with, have a 10-hour stream with every two weeks, right?
Simone Collins: Well, yeah, and, and someone else who apparently, you know, f- considers that partying instead of what most people consider to be partying like going out. Oh, it’s partying.
We’re, we’re
Malcolm Collins: staying up all night, I’m drinking, we’re talking about anime. That’s a party. Yeah, but
Simone Collins: most people think it means dropping egregious amounts of money at some kind of restaurant and [00:50:00] then going to a loud, crowded place, and I’m so glad that there are other people who just enjoy intellectual conversation.
But anyway,
Malcolm Collins: so there’s this faction of her community that they’re not in chat much. They don’t attack me in chat. They’re all fairly nice in chat. Who has like- I’ll put an image on screen here from one of the songs that they made where they
photoshopped Simone out of the song and, and out of an image of me kissing Simone, and they put Leaflet in, and they made it the song about how it could’ve been them.
And I’m like, “Guys I actually find this flattering.” I have my entire life, I will check myself on FanFiction.net and stuff like that for when people have started shipping me with, with whatever, writing crazy fan fics about me. It’s finally happening, and they’re all hate fics. They’re all just so lividly jealous that me, a married guy with five kids, has fantasy world taken their oshi from them.
And I [00:51:00] don’t know what to do. I’m like, h- how can I more convince them that I want her to be married? That her taken.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, I’m extremely- And that we really, really want her to find her person.
You know, they, they... I, I hated that photo of me,
and I like that photo of you, so they, they really fixed it actually.
They ...
Malcolm Collins: You
Simone Collins: totally look so much better in that photo, I’ll tell you what. I’ll tell you what.
Malcolm Collins: And it wasn’t like the song had no views. It had 700 views. That’s like as many as some of our more watched songs. That’s, uh, that’s, uh- And it was only in a couple
Simone Collins: days. Well, that’s fun. That’s fun.
Malcolm Collins: It’s not fun.
I wanted to
Simone Collins: be- It- ...
Malcolm Collins: one of the bros, a representative of the community- ... who they know would never steal their oshi from them. But no, now, now on the, the Malcolm and Simone iceberg that people have created before, you have the Malcolm Leaflet ship song. And hate to me. Everyone needs it.
Simone Collins: Everyone needs it.
Malcolm Collins: I, I will say, for people who don’t [00:52:00] think that I have game apparently my game is strong enough that just seeing me talk to a girl- You have fan
Simone Collins: fiction game. Well, I think if she spoke with anyone for long periods of time, this would happen.
Malcolm Collins: You think? So, yeah. Yeah, I, I, I hope to think that and it’s not, you know, me specifically.
Simone Collins: I, yeah. Okay, Octavian, you wanna say hi real quick?
Yeah.
Okay, hold on. Gotta lean in, buddy.
Okay.
He’s, he’s armed. Oh, I guess I’ll just, I’ll just move my camera. What do you want to say to the people?
Hi.
You just wanna say hi? You just wanna look derpy and say hi? Say something that you learned today.
Octavian: I learned that crystals order some crystals can dissolve.
Simone Collins: That is true. Some crystals can dissolve. Like what about salt crystals? Do they dissolve- Salt
Octavian: crystals. Yeah, sugar and salt.
Simone Collins: That is correct.
Octavian: And they, and they can reform into other, and they can [00:53:00] reform into other crystals.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, and sometimes you can use a seed crystal.
Octavian: Yeah, a seed crystal to reform them.
Exactly.
Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah,
Octavian: very good. Yeah, like sugar bops or something. Sugar
Simone Collins: bo- I don’t know what
that is, but sounds good.
Octavian: Yeah.
Simone Collins: Yeah. All right. Yeah. Go have fun- Yeah ... m- uh, murdering the- Yeah ... the pellets.
Octavian: Yeah. But you know if something went in the water and it disappeared, they can reform just like that, so- Just
Simone Collins: Just, just like that.
You heard it here first on Face Gram. I wonder
Octavian: if a magic-
Simone Collins: He is remarkably charismatic. That was good. You keep it up. Yeah.
Malcolm Collins: I know. He, he’s got game, uh, at, at four and a half. I, he comes off as incredibly likable. I’m, I’m really proud of... I mean, yeah, he’s gonna be good on air. You guys just wait a little bit.
Simone Collins: I know. He was, he was like, just today he was like, “I wish there were a third window that I could join.” Soon. Soon. Yeah. When he gets cogent thoughts, we’ll have him on. I, I told him he has to be able to read fluently. [00:54:00] He’s he’s going through the same hesitancy that I did at his age, so. All right. Let’s get started.
Speaker 9: But doesn’t picking them kill them?
But doesn’t that grind them up and then they die?
Do you love the flowers, Titan?
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe - Visa fler
