Avsnitt
-
A new directive strives to narrow the 11% hourly wage gap between men and women in the EU.
Around the world, the gender pay gap has been shrinking as women gain access to higher education and better employment opportunities. Though varied hours, industries and care responsibilities make this inequality a difficult problem to tackle with one universal policy.
Member states have just passed their deadline to implement measures that will hold employers to account for pay disparities in the workplace so will pay transparency solve the persistent gap?
Contributors:Emma Duchini, assistant professor of economics, University of Essex, UKMarianne Bertrand, professor of economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, USAdamnesh Bogale, head of gender, African Centre for Economic Transformation (ACET), GhanaMarina Tverdostup, economist, Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Austria
Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducer: Evie YabsleyResearcher: Amelia CoxEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: Toby JamesProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: A woman typing. Credit: BBC)
-
In May 2026, the World Health Organization declared an Ebola outbreak in western Africa a public health emergency of international concern. Within days, hundreds of cases had been recorded in the Democratic Republic of Congo, raising fears that the virus could spread further across the region.
Ebola has been causing outbreaks for nearly 50 years, but despite advances in vaccines and treatments, the disease continues to return. But why is it so difficult to treat and contain?
This week on The Inquiry, we’re asking: “Why does Ebola keep coming back?”
Contributors:Syra Madad, infectious disease epidemiologist at the Harvard Belfer Centre, USHypolite Muhindo Mavoko, professor of tropical medicine at the University of Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of CongoAmanda Rojek associate professor of health emergencies at the University of Oxford, UKJulienne Anoko, risk communication and community engagement officer at the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Kenya
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonResearcher: Amelia CoxEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical producer: Nicky EdwardsProduction management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Ebola awareness banner in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Credit: Glordy Murhabazi/Getty Images)
-
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
In 2001, Portugal decriminalised the possession and use of all illicit drugs. It was a move designed to mitigate the country’s public health crisis, which at the time meant Portugal had one of the worst rates of overdose deaths in Europe, as well as the highest rate of HIV among drug users. Whilst drugs remained illegal, users did not receive a criminal record but were instead referred to rehabilitation and treatment programmes. It was an approach that proved so successful, that it has remained in place for a quarter of a century.
But just over 10 years after its introduction, Portugal’s drugs policy started to come under strain as the country’s economic crisis and subsequent austerity measures led to budget cuts for drug services. More recently the rising cost of living has diverted people’s attention from investment in this field. On top of this, the trafficking of cocaine and newer substances into the country along with changing demographics is putting decriminalisation under strain.
So, on The Inquiry this week, we’re asking ‘Is Portugal’s drugs policy in need of reform?’
Contributors:Joana Teixeira, President of the Board of Directors, Institute for Addictive Behaviours and Dependencies (ICAD), Lisbon, PortugalLuís Mendão, Director General, Grupo de Ativistas em Tratamentos (GAT), Lisbon, PortugalAntónio Leitão da Silva, Chief of Police, Braga, Portugal Keith Humphreys, Esther Ting Memorial Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, California, USA
Presenter: David Baker Producer: Jill CollinsTechnical Producer: Toby James Editor: Tom BigwoodProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Discarded drug paraphernalia. Credit: Andy Buchanan/AFP via Getty Images)
-
At the beginning of this year Bulgaria, considered as one of the poorest countries in the European Union, became the latest to officially join the eurozone. Bulgaria’s legal tender since 1881 had been the lev, but since the mid-1990s it had been pegged to other European currencies, first to the German deutschmark and now to the euro. But it remains to be seen if the country’s economic policy can take advantage of the opportunities that joining the single currency can afford, in terms of trade and economic development.
Monetary unions are not a new concept, some like the Scandinavian monetary union date back to the 19th Century, involving Denmark, Sweden and Norway. It established a fixed exchange rate system based on the gold standard, whilst member countries still had their own currencies before it was gradually dissolved from the outbreak of World War One onwards.
Today, the biggest monetary union is the eurozone, used by around 358 million people across 21 European Union countries. It has one monetary authority for all the members and a standardised currency and coinage.
And now the Economic Community of West African States, known as ECOWAS is actively planning a monetary union with a common currency called the eco and pegged to the euro. The ambition is for greater economic sovereignty and regional economic integration.
But with the US dollar as the world’s dominant global reserve currency, even though it’s not part of a global monetary union, is there an argument for one currency across all borders and if so, what should it be?
So, on The Inquiry this week we’re asking, ‘What’s the future for monetary unions?’
Contributors:Assoc Prof Ralitsa Simeonova-Ganeva, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria Prof Barry Eichengreen, University of California, Berkeley, USAProf Mohamed Ben Omar Ndiaye, Cheikh Anta Diop University, SenegalDr Judy Shelton, Senior Fellow, The Independent Institute, California, USA
Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducers: Daniel Rosney and Jill Collins Researcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Tom Bigwood Technical producer: Toby JamesProduction management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Euro and US dollar banknotes. Credit: BBC/Corbis Royalty Free)
-
The Himalayan glaciers are melting more rapidly as global temperatures rise, raising concerns about the future of ecosystems and communities across the Himalayan mountain range. Glaciers store more than two thirds of the world’s freshwater and help regulate global temperatures by reflecting the sun’s rays.
Across South Asia, melting ice is contributing to the formation of unstable glacial lakes and increasing the risks of floods, droughts and avalanches. The Himalayas are a vital source of water for millions of people, supporting agriculture, energy production and livelihoods from tourism.
Experts warn that continued glacier loss could have significant consequences for people living in the region and the mountainous ecosystem, but what can be done to respond to these changes?
Contributors: Pasang Yangjee Sherpa, assistant professor at the University of British Columbia, CanadaPam Pearson, director and founder of the International Cryosphere Climate Initiative, USMatthias Huss, glaciologist and senior scientist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, SwitzerlandAlton Byers, faculty research scientist at the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research at the University of Colorado, US
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt Toulson Researchers: Evie Yabsley and Amelia CoxEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: Mitch GoodallProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Trekkers walk to Everest Base Camp in Nepal. Credit: Kriangkrai Thitimakorn/Getty Images)
-
The recent election result in Hungary has been seen as a welcome relief within the European Union.
The bloc of 27 nations has, at times, felt frustrated with the country for blocking what the other 26 members have agreed to do, especially regarding financial support for Ukraine.
Now the EU has been able to push through a loan to Ukraine of more than US$100bn, and some observers believe the union’s turbulent years are behind it.
As it marks 10 years since the United Kingdom voted to leave, and with Montenegro expected to soon join, this week, what is the future of the European Union?’
Contributors:Dr Monika Sus, professor at the Polish Academy of Sciences and at the Robert Schuman Centre of the European University Institute in Florence, ItalyMichael Geary, professor of European history at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NorwayCatherine E. de Vries, author How Europe Survives: The Adaptability and Resilience of a Continent in Peril, vice dean of the school for politics, economics and global affairs at IE University of Madrid, SpainDr Andi Hoxhaj, lecturer in law and director of the European law and LLM programme at King's College, London, UK
Presenter: Daniel RosneyProducer: Jill CollinsResearcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: James BradshawProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: European Union flags. Credit: Reuters)
-
Global oil markets have been affected by the US Israel war with Iran, leading to higher jet fuel prices and increased attention on supply risks.
But how serious is the situation? While some experts point to tightening supply chains and regional bottlenecks, others say there is no clear evidence so far of immediate shortages.
Even so, the refining and distribution of jet fuel remains a potential vulnerability, as disruption can have notable impacts even when crude oil itself is available. With air travel crucial to trade and tourism, the resilience of fuel supply is a growing concern for economies and travellers. Can alternative suppliers and fuel sources help limit the impact of future disruption?
Contributors: Zach Aman, professor of chemical engineering, the University of Western Australia Ahmed Mehdi, senior fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies and managing director at Renaissance Energy Advisors, UKDumebi Oluwole, lead economist at Stears, NigeriaLi Qiao, professor of aeronautics and astronautics, Purdue University, US
Presenter: Rajan DatarProducer: Matt ToulsonResearcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical producer: Mitch Goodall
(Photo: Airline worker attaching fuel pipe to plane to refuel. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
-
The recent Nasa Artemis II crewed mission to the far side of the Moon is a further step towards a long-term return to the lunar surface and future missions to Mars. The plan is that before the end of the decade there will be a crewed landing and the start of a Moon base. China is among those developing similar plans. Previous missions both crewed and uncrewed have provided evidence of resources that potentially could be of use here on Earth, and support human life on the Moon.
So, it’s not just the race to the Moon that’s capturing the world’s attention, but also the possible economic benefits that that might bring with it. The Moon’s surface or lunar regolith contains volatiles like hydrogen, carbon dioxide and methane. There is evidence of minerals such as silicate and oxides and metals like aluminium and titanium, which could be extracted for building materials. And something that is rare on Earth, Helium-3, a potential resource for clean fusion energy. Governments in conjunction with private corporations are already working on the technology to extract these resources.
Concerns have been raised about the potential damage to the Moon, not only in terms of the depletion of its resources, but in terms of its scientific value and its cultural heritage. Protection ranges from established treaties that prohibit ownership of the moon, to national laws that permit resource extraction. But to date, there is no universally accepted international law in place, which explicitly permits or prohibits lunar mining.
So, this week on the Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Should we mine the Moon?’
Contributors:Dr Dylan Mikesell, principal geophysicist, NGI-The Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway Dr Justin Holcomb, assistant research professor, Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, USAProf Dr Thomas Zurbuchen, director of ETH Space, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, SwitzerlandDr Tanja Masson-Zwaan, assistant professor and deputy director, International Institute of Air and Space Law, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Presenter: William CrawleyProducer: Jill Collins Editor: Tom Bigwood Sound engineer: Nicky Edwards
(Photo: The Moon. Credit: Reuters)
-
Conflict in the Middle East has led to volatility in global oil prices, pushing up fuel costs worldwide. Previous oil shocks prompted some countries to reconsider their reliance on cars, investing in alternatives such as cycling. In some places, this has become part of everyday life, while elsewhere it has proved more contested, reflecting wider political and cultural divides.
Cycling offers benefits for health and the environment, but it is not practical for everyone. For many people, including those in rural areas or with limited mobility, cars remain everyday essentials.
As oil price volatility continues to affect motorists, questions remain about how far behaviour can change.
With contributions from Meredith Glaser, CEO of Urban Cycling Institution, professor of cycling at Ghent University, Belgium, and a senior lecturer at the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Levke Sönksen, research associate at the German Institute of Urban Affairs, Germany; Dr Eunhye Enki Yoo, professor of Geography at the University of Buffalo, US and Martin Tillman, independent transport consultant, UAE.
Presenter: Gary O’DonoghueProducer: Matt ToulsonSound engineer: Richard HannafordEditor: Tom Bigwood
(Photo: Cyclists ride bicycles in Amsterdam. Credit: George Clerk/Getty Images)
-
Broadcasters from The Netherlands, Ireland, Iceland, Spain and Slovenia are all boycotting May’s Eurovision Song Contest because Israel is participating.
Sources within Israel’s broadcaster say calls for it to be banned are unjustified, and organisers of the contest insist it must remain politically neutral, describing the event as "a platform for displaying the importance of peace and unity in a divided world".
The boycott has sparked one of the biggest crises in Eurovision’s 70-year history. In several cases, the position to withdraw also reflects wider pressure from politicians and public opinion. How will countries boycotting Eurovision affect the contest?’
Contributors:Natalija Gorščak, president of the management board of RTV, SloveniaDr Bárbara Barreiro León, lecturer in film and visual Culture, University of Aberdeen, UKDr Heather Dichter, associate professor of sport history and sport management, De Montfort University, UKDr Dean Vuletic, author Postwar Europe and the Eurovision Song Contest, Luxembourg
Presenter/Producer: Daniel RosneyEditor: Tom BigwoodSound Engineer: James BradshawProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Eurovision flags. Credit: Georg Hochmuth/Getty Images)
-
For the second time in 12 years Glasgow is preparing to host the Commonwealth Games after Australia’s Victoria state pulled out because of increased costs. Victoria’s withdrawal raised questions about whether the 2026 games would go ahead before Glasgow agreed to step in.
Staging a sporting mega-event is expensive and governments face increasing scrutiny over public spending. Victoria’s decision raised wider questions about affordability for potential hosts. At the same time, critics question the Games’ political relevance, given its origins in Britain’s colonial past.
The Commonwealth Games Federation says the event can be delivered in a more sustainable way and argues that it brings cultural and economic benefits to host cities, but recent editions have run into significant costs and budget pressures.
Our contributors this week are Dr Stuart Whigham, senior lecturer in sport, coaching and physical education at Oxford Brookes University, UK; Dr Matthew McDowell, lecturer in sport policy, management, and international development at the University of Edinburgh, UK; Dr Verity Postlethwaite, lecturer in strategic event management at Loughborough University, UK and Professor Gayle McPherson, associate dean for research at the University of the West of Scotland, and director of legacy and community engagement for Commonwealth Games Scotland, UK.
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonTechnical Producer: Craig BoardmanEditor: Tom Bigwood
(Photo: 2022 Commonwealth Games gold medals. Credit: Adrian Dennis/Getty Images)
-
Ireland has a new permanent government scheme providing regular cash transfers to 2,000 artists. The people who can access it range from circus performers to opera singers.
It follows a pilot of more than three years, which is believed to have brought a return on investment to the economy.
Big tech backs basic income schemes like this to offset the consequences AI is having on the workforce. Leading economists believe it could create a dystopian world. Nevertheless, more governments are piloting or planning to introduce schemes like this.
Contributors: Dr Jenny Dagg, assistant lecturer, Maynooth University, IrelandDr Catarina Neves, postdoctoral fellow, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Daron Acemoglu, 2024 Nobel Prize winner in economics, institute professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USDr Jurgen De Wispelaere, acting chair of the Basic Income Earth Network.
Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducer: Daniel RosneySound engineer: Craig BoardmanEditor: Tom Bigwood
(Photo: A customer withdraws euro bills from an ATM in Sofia. Credit: Bloomberg/Getty Images)
-
Cuba is facing one of its most severe humanitarian crises in decades.
For years, Cuba relied heavily on oil from Venezuela. Those supplies have largely stopped, contributing to widespread fuel shortages. Electricity blackouts have become increasingly common, disrupting daily life across the country.
The United States has blocked fuel shipments to Cuba as part of wider pressure linked to its economic and political policies. Meanwhile, the Cuban government has warned it will resist any external interference in its domestic affairs.
This weeks panel includes Lillian Guerra, professor of Cuban and Caribbean history at the University of Florida, US; Ricardo Torres, research fellow at American University, US; Christopher Sabatini, senior research fellow for Latin America at Chatham House, UK and Renata Segura, programme director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the International Crisis Group, US.
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonSound engineer: Cameron Ward Editor: Tom Bigwood
(Photo: Havana, the capital of Cuba, during a blackout in March 2026. Credit: Yamil Lage/Getty Images)
-
Rewilding, or letting nature take care of itself, can restore stability to damaged ecosystem components which support life on earth, like fungi, bacteria, vegetation, insects and animals.
But there's now a wider discussion to discover what it’s capable of on a wider scale.
International agreements for reducing the impact of climate change tend to set global targets.
However, individual governments decide how to work towards meeting those goals at a national level.
Some rewilding initiatives improve biodiversity, but it can have negative impacts too.
This week on The Inquiry, we’re asking ‘How can rewilding help combat climate change?’
Contributors: Carolina Soto-Navarro, head of Wilder Nature at Rewilding EuropeBrendan Fisher, professor in the Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, at University of Vermont, USDavid Nogues Bravo, professor in biodiversity, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Steve Carver, professor of rewilding and wilderness science, University of Leeds, UK
Presenter: Charmaine Cozier Producers: Jill Collins and Daniel Rosney Researcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Tom Bigwood Technical Producer: Cameron WardProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Galapagos giant tortoise. Credit: Anadolu/Getty Images)
-
In February, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk posted a social media video celebrating new figures from the International Monetary Fund suggesting that the average person in Poland now has slightly more spending power than the average person in Spain, the European Union’s fourth largest economy.
It’s a symbolic milestone for a country that emerged from communism just over three decades ago and once struggled with hyperinflation and economic upheaval. In 2025, Poland’s economy also passed the trillion-dollar mark, putting it in an elite group of just 20 countries globally.
Investment from across the EU has helped drive growth. But can Poland keep its edge as labour shortages grow and the war in neighbouring Ukraine continues to shape the region?
This week on The Inquiry, Tanya Beckett asks: Why is Poland’s economy booming?
Contributors:Dr Pawel Bukowski, lecturer in economics at University College London and Polish Academy of Sciences, UKIga Magda, associate professor at the Warsaw School of Economics, PolandKatarzyna Rzentarzewska, chief CEE macro economist at Erste Group Bank AG, Austria Rafal Benecki, chief economist at ING, Poland
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonResearcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: Cameron WardProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: A high street in Warsaw. Credit: NurPhoto/Getty Images)
-
Half a million people are in Spain without official permission.
They come mainly from Colombia, Peru, Honduras, Paraguay, and Argentina. It’s thought that most outstay their work, student, or tourist visas.
An amnesty to grant them legal status to remain and work is due to start within weeks.
It's a very different approach from most other countries in Europe that have been tightening controls on migration.
The prime minister has admitted “Some say we've gone too far, that we're going against the current”.
Opposition parties argue that this policy puts pressure on public services.
This week on The Inquiry, we’re asking: “How will Spain’s migrant amnesty work?”
Contributors:Ismael Gálvez Iniesta, assistant professor, department of applied economics, Universitat de les Illes Balears, SpainDonna Cabrera, independent researcher, international migration lecturer, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, ColombiaAlana Moceri, international relations professor, IE University, SpainJoan Monràs, economics professor, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducer: Daniel RosneyResearcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: James BradshawProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Pedro Sánchez the Prime Minister of Spain. Credit: NurPhoto/Getty Images)
-
Control of critical minerals is becoming a source of geopolitical tension. They are essential to modern technology and industries around the world, and China currently dominates the mining and processing industry.
As demand grows, governments in the United States and elsewhere are looking at ways to reduce their reliance on Chinese supply chains. That means investing in new mines and processing facilities even though they are expensive and environmentally toxic.
Ultimately, the US and EU have a goal of diversifying the control of these lucrative elements.
This week on The Inquiry, Tanya Beckett explores whether the rest of the world can catch up with China in the race for rare earths.
Contributors:Julie Michelle Klinger, Associate Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, USSophia Kalanzakos, global distinguished professor of environmental studies and public policy in the Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayan scholars programme at NYU Abu Dhabi, UAEKalim Siddiqui, international economist, UKDr Patrick Schröder, senior research fellow in the Environment and Society Centre at Chatham House, UK
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonResearcher: Evie Yabsley Editor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: Richard Hannaford Production Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: Trucks transporting minded materials. Credit: Las Vegas Review-Journal/Getty Images)
-
The 2026 men’s football World Cup will be the biggest ever staged. For the first time, 48 teams will compete, playing more than 100 matches across North America.
But the expanded scale comes at a cost. Ticket prices are far higher than at the last World Cup in Qatar. With matches also spread across the US, Mexico and Canada, attending the tournament is becoming unaffordable for many global fans.
FIFA says higher revenues will be reinvested to grow the game worldwide and has released some lower-priced tickets for dedicated supporters, but some fan groups say this isn’t going far enough.
This week on The Inquiry, we’re asking: Is the 2026 World Cup an own goal?
Contributors:Dr Christina Philippou, associate professor in sport finance at the University of Portsmouth, UKDr Victor Matheson, professor of economics at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, USDr Johan Rewilak, associate professor of sport management at Loughborough University, UKMiguel Delaney, chief football writer, The Independent newspaper in the UK
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonResearcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: Cameron WardProduction Management: Phoebe Lomas and Liam Morrey
(Photo: FIFA World Cup Trophy is displayed during the FIFA World Cup 2026. Credit: Pool/Getty Images)
-
Chennai, São Paulo, Mexico City, Tehran, Cape Town - these cities have all faced the threat of a ‘Zero Day’, or, having no fresh water left in their taps.
The UN says we’re entering a ‘water bankruptcy’ era, meaning our water ‘current accounts’ are running empty, while our ‘savings accounts’ - the long term stores of water deep underground - have been depleted, with some beyond repair.
So how did we get here?
From clearing forests for cattle grazing, to thirsty AI data centres, Rajan Datar examines the pressures on our global water supply and looks for solutions.
Contributors:Jayshree Vencatesan, Co-founder, Care Earth Trust, IndiaAugusto Getirana, research scientist at NASA's Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, USAProf Bridget Scanlon, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas, USA Dr Jie-Sheng Tan Soo, Director, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, National University of Singapore
Presenter: Rajan DatarProducer: Phoebe KeaneResearcher: Evie YabsleyEditor: Richard Fenton-SmithTechnical Producer: Cameron WardProduction Management Assistant: Liam Morrey
(Photo: Indian women with empty plastic pots protest as they demand drinking water. Credit: Arun Sankar/Getty Images)
-
Bangladesh will hold a national election in February, after years of political turmoil and the ousting of long-time leader Sheikh Hasina. Her rule of more than a decade delivered strong economic growth but was also accompanied by tighter political control and repeated confrontations with protesters.
Sheikh Hasina’s party, the Awami League, has been banned. This has brought renewed focus on the Bangladesh Nationalist Party’s leader Tarique Rahman, who is the son of former prime minister Khaleda Zia, as well as several emerging challengers.
Following years of unrest, the vote is seen as a test of whether Bangladesh can move towards political stability.
This week on The Inquiry, we’re asking: What does the national election mean for the future of Bangladesh?
Contributors:Shaheen Mamun, Executive Director of the Jargoron Foundation, London, UKZia Chowdhury, journalist, Dhaka, Bangladesh Rounaq Jahan, Distinguished Fellow at the Centre for Policy Dialogue, Dhaka, Bangladesh Constantino Xavier, Senior Fellow at the Centre for Social and Economic Progress, New Delhi, India
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonResearcher: Evie Yabsley Editor: Tom BigwoodTechnical Producer: Cameron WardProduction Management Assistant: Liam Morrey
This programme has been updated since the original broadcast.
(Photo: A woman casting her ballot during the 2024 national election in Bangladesh. Credit: Ahmed Salahuddin/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
- Visa fler
