Avsnitt
-
“All four with clean records. No police force in the world knows them or their work. In their fields, the very best.”
Unveiling a Hidden Heist Film Gem from 1967In 1967, Italian director Giuliano Montaldo brought together an international cast for an ambitious heist film co-production between Italy, Spain, and West Germany. Coming off his success with The Reckless, which was nominated for the Golden Bear prize at the Berlin International Film Festival, Montaldo secured Edward G. Robinson and Janet Leigh as two of his leads. With legendary composer Ennio Morricone providing the score, the production aimed to create a sophisticated entry in the burgeoning heist film genre. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Heist Films series with a conversation about Montaldo’s 1967 film Grand Slam.
Breaking Down This International Heist Caper
The film follows a meticulous plan to rob $10 million in diamonds during Rio's Carnaval, orchestrated by Robinson's retired professor character. We discuss how the film builds tension through its carefully assembled team of specialists and elaborate heist sequence. While the ending has divided audiences over the years, we explore how this twist-filled finale actually enhances the film's themes about crime and betrayal.
Key Elements of the Grand Slam Heist
• The innovative card catalog system used to assemble the criminal team
• Klaus Kinski's intense performance as the ex-military member of the crew
• Janet Leigh's role and how her development may have been too much a giveaway, at least through modern eyes
• Ennio Morricone's distinctive, Carnaval-influenced score
• The technical achievement of the vault robbery sequence
• The film's use of international locations, including some clever substitutions (and some bad blue screen)When Plans Come Together
Despite being somewhat forgotten today, Grand Slam delivers as both a meticulously crafted heist film and an engaging story with great characters. We both rate it highly, appreciating its technical prowess and storytelling even when some of the twists become predictable. The film deserves more recognition among classic heist films of the 1960s for its innovative approach and international flair. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple, Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“In films, either you’ve got a face or you don’t got a face. You've got a face. Can I have it, please?”
A Comedic Heist Caper from an Unlikely CollaborationIn 1966, Peter Sellers sought to work with renowned Italian neorealist director Vittorio De Sica, bringing aboard playwright Neil Simon to pen his first screenplay. Despite De Sica's reported gambling debts motivating his involvement, the collaboration proved challenging. De Sica struggled with Simon's script and Sellers' performance style, while conflicts arose over casting choices, including Sellers' then-wife Britt Ekland. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Heist Films series with a conversation about De Sica’s 1966 film After the Fox.
Breaking Down This Fox's Complicated Hunt
The film weaves together elements of heist capers and Hollywood satire, following master criminal Aldo "The Fox" Vanucci as he poses as an Italian film director to orchestrate a gold heist. While the premise shows promise, the movie struggles to balance its dual identity as both heist film and industry commentary. However, the stellar performances, particularly from Sellers and Victor Mature (playing a delightfully self-aware version of himself), help elevate the material beyond its structural issues.
Key Elements of This Unique Crime Comedy
• Peter Sellers' multiple disguises and his protective relationship with his sister (played by then-wife Britt Ekland)
• Victor Mature's comeback performance lampooning his own image
• The film's satirical take on moviemaking and celebrity culture
• Burt Bacharach's memorable earworm title song
• The clever setup of the heist using a film production as cover
• A somewhat disappointing climactic car chase that fails to deliver on the film's early promiseWhile After the Fox may not fully succeed as either a heist film or industry satire, it offers enough charm and laughs to warrant attention. The film's unique blend of crime caper and showbiz satire, combined with Sellers' comedic prowess, makes it an entertaining entry in both his filmography and the heist genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
“A perfect hit! And no pain for the target. Too bad the guy was only 38; just two years older, he'd have been worth three times the points.”
Roger Corman's Vision of a Dystopian FutureIn 1974, Roger Corman learned about Norman Jewison's upcoming film Rollerball and decided to capitalize on its publicity by producing his own futuristic sports film. Based on a short story by Ib Melchior inspired by his experiences at the Indianapolis 500, Corman brought on Paul Bartel to direct what would become a satirical commentary on violence in entertainment and totalitarian control. With a budget of just $300,000, Corman assembled a cast including David Carradine and a pre-Rocky Sylvester Stallone to create this violent vision of America's future. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Roger Corman series with a conversation about Bartel’s 1975 film Death Race 2000.
Racing Through the Film's Key Points
The film's unique blend of dark comedy and social commentary creates an engaging discussion about its place in both exploitation cinema and political satire. We explore how Corman's influence shaped the film's development, particularly his push to emphasize comedy and include gratuitous elements that became his trademark. The movie's transformation from a serious script to a more satirical piece showcases Corman's understanding of what would appeal to audiences.
Additional Pit Stops in Our Discussion
• The cultural context of car-themed movies in the 1970s and their connection to American car culture
• David Carradine's performance as Frankenstein and whether he was the right choice for the role
• The film's commentary on media manipulation and fan culture
• How the limited budget affected the scale of the cross-country race
• The surprising franchise legacy, including multiple sequels and remakes
• Tak Fujimoto's cinematography and how it enhanced the racing sequencesA Victory Lap Worth Taking
Despite its low budget and exploitation elements, Death Race 2000 succeeds as both entertainment and satire. While some critics initially dismissed it, including Roger Ebert who gave it zero stars before later acknowledging its merits, the film has earned its place as a cult classic. Both hosts thoroughly enjoyed the film, with Andy giving it four stars and Pete giving it three stars with a heart on Letterboxd. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.
-
“This was not intended to be a book-of-the-month club lunch.”
A British Heist Film That Set Early Genre StandardsIn 1958, John Boland published his novel The League of Gentlemen, which quickly caught the attention of British filmmakers. Director Basil Dearden, known for his work with Ealing Studios, saw potential in this story of ex-military men planning an elaborate bank robbery. Working with screenwriter Bryan Forbes, who also took a role in the film, Dearden assembled an impressive cast including Jack Hawkins, Richard Attenborough, and Nigel Patrick. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we return to our Heist Films series with a conversation about Dearden’s 1960 film The League of Gentlemen.
Breaking Down This Military-Precision Heist
The film follows a group of former military officers who, feeling cast aside by society (and kicked out of the military), band together to execute a sophisticated bank robbery. As we discuss the film, we explore how it handles character development within its large ensemble cast. While some characters receive more attention than others, the film mostly effectively balances its numerous players. Furthermore, we examine how the film's visual elements, particularly the smoke-filled heist sequence with gas masks, create memorable and striking imagery in black and white.
Exploring Themes and Cultural Context
Throughout our discussion, we delve into several fascinating aspects of the film:
The military hierarchy that naturally reasserts itself among the charactersThe film's commentary on post-war soldiers struggling to find their place in societyThe blend of comedy and crime elements that would influence future heist filmsThe impressive performances, particularly from Jack Hawkins and Richard AttenboroughThe film's innovative use of practical effects, especially during the climactic heist sequenceThe cultural attitudes and gender relations reflected in the filmA Must-Watch Early Heist Film
The League of Gentlemen stands as an important early entry in the heist film genre, arriving the same year as the original Ocean's 11. While some character development opportunities may have been missed due to the large cast, the film succeeds in delivering both entertainment and social commentary. We both thoroughly enjoyed this British crime caper, particularly appreciating its technical achievements and ensemble performances. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“When I asked for your advice, I didn't mean that you should actually speak.”
Rebooting the Jack Ryan FranchiseAfter the success of Patriot Games and Clear and Present Danger, Paramount Pictures aimed to continue the Jack Ryan franchise with an adaptation of The Sum of All Fears. Initially, Harrison Ford was set to reprise his role as Jack Ryan, but he and director Phillip Noyce dropped out due to script issues. Paramount then decided to reboot the franchise with a younger actor, offering the role to Ben Affleck, who received blessings from Ford and Alec Baldwin. With director Phil Alden Robinson on board, the stage was set for a new era of Jack Ryan. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Noyce’s 2002 film The Sum of All Fears.
A Bold Adaptation Filled with Fascinating Political Intrigue
In this episode, we delve into the daring choices made in adapting Clancy's novel, particularly how the film allows Jack Ryan, the embodiment of institutional intelligence, to fail. The movie's second half, focusing on the aftermath of a devastating bomb blast in Baltimore, surprised us with its engaging portrayal of escalating tensions between the U.S. and Russian presidents. We appreciate how the film questions the intelligence and diplomacy machine by highlighting Ryan's struggle to convey crucial information to decision-makers.
(Mostly) Great Performances and Controversial Villains
Throughout our discussion, we praise the performances of James Cromwell as President Fowler, Morgan Freeman as CIA Director William Cabot, and Liev Schreiber as John Clark. However, we do struggle a bit with Affleck playing Ryan. We also express disappointment in the film's decision to replace the Islamic terrorists from the novel with neo-Nazis, feeling that it weakens the story's impact and makes the villains less compelling.
Other points:
The challenges of adapting Clancy's novel and the script issues that led to the rebootBen Affleck's performance as a younger Jack RyanThe film's depiction of the U.S. and Russian presidents' responses to the crisisAlan Bates and Colm Feore's roles as tepid neo-Nazi villains and their impact on the storyA Thought-Provoking Entry in the Jack Ryan Series
While The Sum of All Fears may not be the most celebrated entry in the Jack Ryan series, it offers a thought-provoking exploration of political intrigue and the consequences of intelligence failures. Despite some weaknesses in its adaptation choices and the lead casting choice, the film's second half delivers a gripping narrative that keeps viewers engaged. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“The course of action I’d suggest is a course of action I can’t suggest.”
The Road to Clear and Present DangerAfter the success of Patriot Games, Paramount Pictures was eager to continue the Jack Ryan series with another adaptation of a Tom Clancy novel. With Harrison Ford set to return as the intrepid CIA analyst and Phillip Noyce back in the director's chair, the stage was set for Clear and Present Danger. The film, released in 1994, brought a new level of complexity to the series, delving into the murky world of covert operations and political machinations. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Clear and Present Danger.
Navigating the Murky Waters of Clear and Present Danger
In our discussion, we dive into the intricacies of Clear and Present Danger, exploring how the film captures the complexities of the political landscape and the moral ambiguity of covert operations. We examine Harrison Ford's portrayal of Jack Ryan, noting how he brings a different energy to the character compared to his performance in Patriot Games. The film's ability to balance the high-stakes political drama in Washington with the intense action sequences in Colombia is a point of interest, as we analyze how these two seemingly disparate storylines ultimately converge.
Uncovering the Layers of Corruption
Clear and Present Danger takes us on a journey through the labyrinthine world of government corruption, where personal agendas and political maneuvering take precedence over the greater good. We discuss:
The performances of Henry Czerny and Harris Yulin as the villainous Ritter and CutterWillem Dafoe's role as John Clark and the film's portrayal of covert military operationsThe emotional impact of James Earl Jones' character, Admiral Greer, and his relationship with Jack RyanA Thrilling Addition to the Jack Ryan Series
While Clear and Present Danger may not be perfect, it remains a compelling entry in the Jack Ryan series. The film's ability to tackle complex themes and its unflinching look at the darker aspects of government operations make it a thought-provoking and engaging watch. Harrison Ford's performance as Jack Ryan, coupled with the strong supporting cast, elevates the material and keeps the audience invested in the story.
Clear and Present Danger stands as a testament to the enduring appeal of Tom Clancy's novels and the Jack Ryan character. Its exploration of political corruption, moral ambiguity, and the consequences of unchecked power remains as relevant today as it was upon the film's release. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material or on AudibleLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“You walk into a bar, half of whose customers want you dead. You walk up to the IRA's bagman, and in front of his guys, you threaten him? You're not a field man, Jack. You never were. You are an analyst. Analyze that.”
The Second Chapter in Jack Ryan's JourneyAfter the success of The Hunt for Red October, Paramount Pictures faced challenges bringing the next Jack Ryan story to the screen. The situation with Alec Baldwin's departure proved contentious, with Baldwin claiming Paramount "cut his throat" by negotiating with another actor (presumably Ford) while still in talks with him. The studio allegedly used Baldwin's Broadway commitment to A Streetcar Named Desire and script approval demands as leverage to make the switch. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Phillip Noyce’s 1992 film Patriot Games.
Playing Both Sides of the Game
The transition from Baldwin to Ford fundamentally changes the character's dynamics, shifting from a younger analyst to a more seasoned veteran. We explore how this affected the film's tone and action sequences, particularly discussing whether some of the more intense scenes feel appropriate for Ryan's character. The film presents an intriguing mirror story between Ryan and Sean Miller - both men driven by family, albeit in opposing directions. While Ryan fights to protect his family, Miller seeks revenge for his brother's death, creating parallel narratives that drive the story's conflict.
Elements That Drive the Action
• The controversial casting change and its implications for the franchise
• The mirrored narratives of family protection versus family revenge
• Sean Bean's memorable performance as vengeful terrorist Sean Miller
• The innovative satellite attack sequence that showcases '90s military technology
• Debate over the film's balance between analysis and action
• The political dynamics of presenting IRA terrorism to American audiences
• Discussion of whether the finale's boat chase sequence serves the story effectivelyPatriot Games successfully continues the Jack Ryan franchise while charting its own course, though some creative choices push the character in new directions that don't always align with his analytical roots. The film proves entertaining even as it diverges from the more cerebral approach of its predecessor. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“You’re in a house of desperate women here, and a long, long way from home.”
Roger Corman's Exploitation Cinema: The Story Behind Caged HeatIn the early 1970s, Roger Corman was producing a slew of women-in-prison films, capitalizing on the exploitation genre that had been popular then. When wannabe director Jonathan Demme approached Corman with the idea for Caged Heat, Corman initially declined, believing the subgenre had run its course. Undeterred, Demme raised the funds independently and eventually secured Corman as the distributor. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue our member bonusRoger Corman series with a conversation about Demme’s 1974 film Caged Heat.
Exploring the Depths of Women's Incarceration in Caged Heat
In our discussion, we delve into the themes and statements Demme makes about institutional oppression, mental health, and unethical medical practices within the prison system. We also examine how the film attaches power to sexuality, potentially empowering the female characters in a way that was uncommon for the era. Additionally, we touch on the interesting casting choices, particularly Barbara Steele as the prison warden and Warren Miller as the sociopathic doctor, and how these decisions subvert audience expectations.
Caged Heat: A Closer Look at the Characters and Filmmaking Techniques
Throughout the episode, we discuss:
The relationships between the various inmates and how Demme allows time for character developmentTak Fujimoto's cinematography and the effective use of tracking shotsThe film's balance between comedy and serious momentsThe shocking and powerful sequence involving shock therapyWhile Caged Heat may not be a perfect film, it offers an intriguing look at the women-in-prison subgenre through the lens of Jonathan Demme's early directorial work. The movie's exploration of serious themes, combined with its exploitation elements, makes for an engaging and thought-provoking viewing experience. Although we have some reservations about the film and the subgenre as a whole, we appreciate the conversations it sparks. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Amazon or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.
-
“Andrei, you've lost another submarine?”
From Novel to Box Office SuccessIn 1984, Tom Clancy published his first novel The Hunt for Red October, which garnered attention from military officials for its technical accuracy. Despite the book's success, Hollywood struggled to adapt it. Producer Mace Neufeld optioned the rights but faced resistance from studios who considered the story too complicated. It wasn't until 1990, after six years of development, that the film finally made it to theaters. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about The Hunt for Red October.
Diving Deep into Cold War Tensions
The film introduces us to Alec Baldwin as Jack Ryan, a CIA analyst who finds himself thrust into an intricate game of cat and mouse when he discovers that Soviet submarine commander Marko Ramius (Sean Connery) might be attempting to defect. We explore how Baldwin embodies the reluctant hero aspect of Ryan's character more effectively than subsequent actors in the role. The film's deliberate pacing and focus on intellectual strategy over action sequences sets it apart from typical action films of its era and beyond.
Breaking the Surface with McTiernan's Direction
Director John McTiernan, fresh off the success of Die Hard, brings his expertise to create tension through careful character development rather than relying solely on action sequences. The film's innovative language transition technique and strong performances from the international cast contribute to its enduring appeal.
Other Discussion Points:
The film's groundbreaking $30 million budget and its box office successSean Connery's commanding presence despite his Scottish accent playing a LithuanianThe technical accuracy and military support in productionCourtney B. Vance's standout performance as Sonar Operator JonesThe film's clever handling of submarine warfare technologyThe evolution of Jack Ryan as a character across different actorsThe Hunt for Red October stands as one of the strongest entries in the Jack Ryan series, masterfully balancing intellectual intrigue with taut action sequences. The film maintains suspense through character development and strategic narrative choices rather than relying on conventional action tropes. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“The heavens have never seen such an ignominious Patsak as you, Violinist. It grieves me deeply.”
A Satirical Take on Soviet SocietyKin-Dza-Dza!, a 1986 Soviet science fiction comedy film directed by Georgiy Daneliya, was initially met with skepticism by Soviet authorities due to its satirical nature. However, Daneliya persevered and managed to get the film made, despite the challenges of filming in the hot Turkmenistan desert and dealing with bureaucratic red tape that delayed production. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we wrap up this return to our Soviet Sci-Fi series with a conversation about Daneliya’s 1986 film Kin-Dza-Dza!.
Diving into the Absurdist World of Kin-Dza-Dza!
We explore the film's absurdist humor and how it effectively satirizes various aspects of Soviet society, such as the rigid caste system, the limitations on free speech, and the devolution of language. We discuss how the film's low-budget, dystopian aesthetic contributes to its commentary on consumerism and environmentalism, drawing comparisons to other works like Idiocracy and the films of Terry Gilliam and Jean-Pierre Jeunet.
The Strengths of Soviet Science Fiction
Throughout our discussion, we highlight how Kin-Dza-Dza! exemplifies the strengths of Soviet science fiction in its ability to critique contemporary society through a futuristic lens. We also touch on:
The performances of the actors and their commitment to the absurdist toneThe film's clever use of practical effects and production designThe recurring jokes and their cultural significance, such as the "match math"Kin-Dza-Dza! stands as a unique and entertaining entry in the Soviet science fiction canon, successfully blending biting social commentary with absurdist humor. Its ability to critique Soviet society while still being an engaging and entertaining film is a testament to Daneliya's skill as a filmmaker and the power of science fiction to reflect on contemporary issues. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Buy the Blu-ray from Deaf Crocodile, See where they’re streaming it, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“I don’t want to live among the fishes anymore. I’ll die of loneliness.”
A Soviet Sci-Fi Fairy Tale of Love and ScienceIn the 1960s, during the Khrushchev Thaw, Soviet filmmakers were given more creative freedom to explore stories beyond the typical Stalinist propaganda. This period saw a surge in sci-fi films, including the 1961 classic Amphibian Man, directed by Vladimir Chebotaryov and Gennadiy Kazanskiy. Based on the novel by Alexander Beliaev, the film tells the story of a man with surgically implanted shark gills who falls in love with a young woman, despite the disapproval of her capitalist suitor. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off a short return to our Soviet Sci-Fi series with a conversation about the 1961 film Amphibian Man.
Diving Deep into the Story's Themes and Motifs
In our discussion, we explore how Amphibian Man weaves together elements of science fiction, romance, and social commentary. The film's protagonist, Ichtyandr, embodies the Soviet ideal of scientific progress, while his love interest, Gutiere, represents the allure of a world beyond his underwater utopia. We also examine the film's villain, Don Pedro, as a classic capitalist exploiter, showcasing the Soviet critique of Western values.
Throughout our conversation, we delve into the fairy tale aspects of the story, the believability of the romance, and the tragic ending that subverts expectations. We also discuss the technical achievements of the underwater cinematography and the film's influence on modern directors like Guillermo del Toro.
Other Topics Covered in the Episode
The film's original title, "Tarzan of the Sea," and its copyright issuesThe dream sequence and its role in the narrativeThe ambiguity surrounding Ichtyandr's abilities and the dolphin sceneAccusations of plagiarism against Guillermo del Toro's The Shape of WaterThe changing perceptions of ocean exploitation in Soviet cinemaA Timeless Tale of Love and Progress
Amphibian Man may not be a perfect film, but it remains a fascinating example of Soviet sci-fi cinema during a period of creative liberation. Its blend of science, romance, and social commentary creates a timeless fairy tale that continues to captivate audiences decades later. Despite some plot inconsistencies and missed opportunities, the film's core themes and visual splendor make it a worthwhile entry in the genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Amazon or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“I’ve got a weird sense of humor, man.”
Pushing Boundaries in Found Footage HorrorMark Duplass, known for his contributions to the mumblecore movement, teamed up with newcomer Patrick Brice to create a low-budget indie horror film that would challenge conventions and explore the unsettling nature of human interactions. With Duplass's experience in crafting authentic, character-driven stories and Brice's fresh perspective, they set out to push the boundaries of the found footage genre. Armed with a minimal crew, a largely improvised script, and a shared vision, they embarked on a journey that would result in the creation of Creep. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we return to our Found Footage series with a conversation about Brice’s 2014 film Creep.
Authenticity, Eccentricity, and Malevolence
In our discussion of Creep, we explore how the film navigates the spectrum between authenticity, eccentricity, and malevolence. We examine Mark Duplass' portrayal of Joseph, a character who initially comes across as genuine and relatable but gradually reveals a darker, more unsettling side. The found footage aesthetic enhances the sense of unease, blurring the lines between reality and fiction. Additionally, we delve into the movie's ability to subvert audience expectations and keep viewers on edge throughout.
Other Points of Discussion
The effective use of a minimalist cast and settingThe possible and somewhat weak attempt at creating a twistThe chemistry between Mark Duplass and Patrick BriceThe film's exploration of the darker aspects of human natureThe pacing issues in the latter half of the movieCreeping into the Horror Genre
Creep showcases the potential of low-budget, independent filmmaking to create a memorable and unsettling horror experience. Mark Duplass' expertise in crafting authentic characters, combined with Patrick Brice's fresh perspective, results in a film that pushes the boundaries of the found footage genre. Despite some pacing issues, Creep's exploration of the darker aspects of human nature and its ability to keep the audience guessing make it a worthwhile addition to the horror genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“It’s called ‘Murdered Man’.”
Roger Corman's Comical Foray into Beatnik HorrorIn the late 1950s, American International Pictures approached Roger Corman to create a low-budget horror film in just five days, using sets from another project. Corman, along with screenwriter Charles B. Griffith, decided to take a satirical approach, crafting a black comedy that poked fun at the beatnik culture of the era. The result was A Bucket of Blood, a quirky and entertaining film that showcases Corman's ability to deliver a memorable movie on a shoestring budget. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the member bonus Roger Corman series with a conversation about A Bucket of Blood.
Sculpting a Masterpiece of Macabre Humor
In our discussion of A Bucket of Blood, we delve into the film's clever satirical elements and its comical take on the horror genre. We explore how the movie lampoons both the beatnik scene and the pretentiousness of the art world, with Corman and Griffith drawing from their own experiences and observations. The film's lead actor, Dick Miller, delivers a standout performance as the lovable yet misguided busboy-turned-artist Walter Paisley, whose quest for fame and acceptance takes a dark and murderous turn.
Corman's Signature Style and Social Commentary
Throughout our conversation, we touch upon various aspects of the film that showcase Roger Corman's signature style and his ability to infuse social commentary into his low-budget productions. We examine how A Bucket of Blood addresses themes of social mobility, the search for identity, and the folly of pursuing success at any cost. Additionally, we discuss how the film fits into the broader context of 1950s cinema, drawing comparisons to other notable works of the era, such as Rebel Without a Cause and film noir.
Other points covered in our discussion include:
The film's effective use of a limited set and budgetThe portrayal of the beat generation and youth cultureThe transformation of Walter Paisley from protagonist to antagonistThe satirical representation of the art world and its patronsA Timeless Tale of Ambition and Morality
A Bucket of Blood may be a product of its time, but its themes and humor remain relatable and entertaining decades later. Corman's ability to craft a compelling and thought-provoking story within the constraints of a tight budget and schedule is a testament to his skill as a filmmaker. While the film's low-budget origins are evident, its clever writing, memorable performances, and biting satire more than compensate for any technical limitations. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.
-
“Did someone hear a woman cry?”
A Haunting Guatemalan Ghost StoryIn 2019, Guatemalan filmmaker Jayro Bustamante released his third feature film, La Llorona, a haunting ghost story that explores the aftermath of the Guatemalan genocide. The film premiered at the Venice Film Festival and was selected as the Guatemalan entry for the Best International Feature Film at the 93rd Academy Awards. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Ghost Stories series with a conversation about La Llorona.
Women Confronting the Horrors of the Past
In our discussion of La Llorona, we focus on how the film centers around the women in a retired general's family as they grapple with the accusations of genocide against him. Through the mysterious presence of their new housekeeper, Alma, and the visions she induces, the general's wife, daughter, and granddaughter are forced to confront the truth about his actions and their own complicity in the horrors of the past. As the story unfolds, the general becomes an increasingly antagonistic figure, unable to face the consequences of his past deeds.
Blending the Ghost Story Genre with the La Llorona Myth
La Llorona effectively combines elements of the traditional ghost story genre with the well-known Latin American folktale of La Llorona, the weeping woman. Bustamante skillfully weaves these two narrative threads together, creating a haunting and atmospheric tale that slowly reveals the truth behind Alma's presence and her connection to the general's victims. The film's use of water imagery and the unsettling presence of ghostly figures further enhances the eerie and unsettling tone.
Other topics covered in our conversation include:
The strong performances of the cast, particularly María Mercedes Coroy as Alma and Margarita Kenéfic as the general's wifeThe film's commentary on the intergenerational trauma caused by the Guatemalan genocideThe gradual revelation of Alma's true nature and her role in the storyThe importance of acknowledging and confronting the atrocities of the pastA Thought-Provoking and Haunting Film
La Llorona is a powerful and thought-provoking film that uses the ghost story genre and the La Llorona myth to shed light on the horrors of the Guatemalan genocide. Through its haunting atmosphere, strong performances, and exploration of intergenerational trauma, the film leaves a lasting impact on its viewers. La Llorona is a compelling and important work that deserves to be seen and discussed. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“You know, if they take a personal belonging, something that you treasure, then there’s no escape from them. You’ll be marked and they’ll always know how to find you.”
Uncovering the Horrors of War and Gender InequalityIranian filmmaker Babak Anvari's directorial debut, Under the Shadow, hit the festival circuit in 2016, garnering critical acclaim and numerous awards. Set in Tehran during the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, this Persian-language horror film delves into the personal and societal struggles of a mother and daughter as they face both the terrors of war and the oppression of gender inequality. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Ghost Stories series with a conversation about Under the Shadow.
Peeling Back the Layers of Fear
From the ever-present threat of war to the social horror of gender inequality, Anvari masterfully weaves together a tapestry of terror that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats. We discuss how the film's supernatural elements, in the form of malevolent spirits known as djinn, serve as a metaphor for the protagonist's internal struggles and the trauma she faces.
Throughout our conversation, we explore the powerful performances of the film's lead actors, particularly Narges Rashidi as the mother, Shideh. Her portrayal of a woman grappling with the loss of her dreams and the pressures of motherhood in a war-torn, patriarchal society is both haunting and inspiring. We also touch on the film's effective use of sound design and cinematography to create an atmosphere of unease and dread.
Digging Deeper into the Discussion
The symbolism of the doll as a representation of Shideh's maternal instincts and her daughter's need for protectionThe ambiguity surrounding the origins of the djinn and their connection to the characters' traumaThe film's commentary on the psychological effects of war and oppression on individuals and societyThe open-ended nature of the film's conclusion and its implications for the characters' futuresUnveiling the Significance of Under the Shadow
Under the Shadow is a testament to the power of horror cinema to explore complex social and political issues. By blending the supernatural with the all-too-real horrors of war and gender inequality, Anvari has crafted a film that is both terrifying and thought-provoking. Despite some minor criticisms regarding the clarity of certain plot points, we ultimately find Under the Shadow to be a compelling and essential addition to the canon of international horror cinema. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“Maybe, he suddenly just wanted to die. I get that way sometimes.”
The Rise of J-Horror in the International SpotlightJapanese horror, or J-Horror, has a rich history dating back decades, with influential works like Masaki Kobayashi's Kwaidan (1964) and Nobuhiko Obayashi's House (1977) paving the way for the genre. However, it was in the late 1990s and early 2000s that J-Horror truly gained international recognition, thanks to a wave of innovative and terrifying films that captivated audiences worldwide. One of the most significant and thought-provoking films of this era was Kiyoshi Kurosawa's 2001 masterpiece, Pulse. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Ghost Stories series with a conversation about Pulse.
Exploring the Depths of Loneliness in a Connected World
At its core, Pulse is a haunting meditation on the themes of isolation and disconnection in an increasingly technology-driven society. Kurosawa skillfully weaves a narrative that blurs the boundaries between the physical and digital realms, as the characters become entangled in a supernatural world accessed through the internet. As the film progresses, it becomes clear that the true horror lies not in the ghostly apparitions, but in the profound sense of emptiness and loneliness that permeates the characters' lives. Throughout our discussion, we examine how Pulse effectively communicates these themes through its atmospheric storytelling, unsettling imagery, and nuanced performances.
Crafting an Unforgettable Atmosphere
Kurosawa's deliberate use of static shots and wide angles to emphasize the characters' isolationThe film's focus on the younger generation and their relationship with emerging technologiesThe iconic "ghost" movements and the smudged, blurred effects used to depict the supernatural entitiesThe choice of eerie locations, such as abandoned buildings and desolate streets, which contribute to the film's oppressive atmospherePulse's Lasting Impact on J-Horror and Beyond
More than two decades after its release, Pulse continues to stand as a landmark film in the J-Horror genre and a testament to Kiyoshi Kurosawa's visionary directorial prowess. The film's exploration of the potential dangers lurking within our increasingly connected world remains as relevant as ever, striking a chord with contemporary audiences. While the narrative's pace may prove challenging at times, Pulse's ability to provoke introspection and unsettle viewers is undeniable. Its influence can be seen in numerous subsequent horror films, both in Japan and internationally, cementing its status as a true classic of the genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Andy’s J-Horror to Watch listWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“You’re mine now. From now on, you must devote your whole life to me.”
A Ghost Story as a Statement on Pride and GreedKenji Mizoguchi's 1953 film Ugetsu, based on stories by Akinari Ueda and Guy de Maupassant, is a haunting tale set in war-torn 16th century Japan. The film follows two peasant couples whose lives are upended by the devastation of war and the allure of ambition. Ugetsu masterfully blends the supernatural with the harsh realities of the human condition, creating a timeless masterpiece that continues to captivate audiences. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Ghost Stories series with a conversation about Ugetsu.
Ugetsu: A Dive into the Ethereal and the Earthly
In our discussion of Ugetsu, we explore how Mizoguchi seamlessly weaves together the ghostly and the mundane to create a powerful narrative. The film's central character, Genjuro, a potter, becomes consumed by his desire for wealth and fame, ultimately falling under the spell of a mysterious noblewoman who turns out to be a ghost. This supernatural element serves as a metaphor for the destructive nature of unchecked ambition and pride.
We also delve into the film's portrayal of the effects of war on the peasant class, particularly the women who are left behind to fend for themselves while their husbands pursue their dreams. Mizoguchi's empathetic lens highlights the resilience and strength of these women in the face of unimaginable hardship.
Other Facets of Ugetsu
The film's stunning cinematography and its role in creating an otherworldly atmosphereThe use of traditional Japanese theater techniques, such as the stylized makeup worn by Lady WakasaThe juxtaposition of Genjuro's story with that of his brother-in-law, Tobei, who seeks fame as a samuraiThe film's poignant ending and its commentary on the consequences of neglecting one's family and responsibilitiesA Timeless Tale of Human Fallibility
Ugetsu is a film that transcends its historical setting to deliver a powerful message about the dangers of pride, greed, and the pursuit of glory at the expense of what truly matters. Mizoguchi's masterful direction, combined with the film's haunting visuals and compelling performances, cements Ugetsu's place as a true classic of world cinema. We thoroughly enjoyed discussing this thought-provoking and emotionally resonant film. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Pete’s Letterboxd Ghost Story WatchlistTune in to our conversation about Ugetsu with production designer Yôhei Taneda on Movies We Like in either English or JapaneseWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“Anyone trying to leave the train by force will be stopped by force.”
An All-Star 70s Disaster Film Mash-UpThe 1970s saw a surge in the popularity of disaster films, with movies like The Poseidon Adventure, The Towering Inferno, and Earthquake captivating audiences. In 1976, director George P. Cosmatos and producer Carlo Ponti joined forces to create their own entry in the genre: The Cassandra Crossing. With an all-star ensemble cast including Sophia Loren, Richard Harris, Burt Lancaster, Martin Sheen, OJ Simpson, and Ava Gardner, the film aimed to capitalize on the decade's love for big-budget spectacles filled with peril and suspense. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we wrap up this return to our Disease Films series with a conversation about The Cassandra Crossing.
Sneezing in Rice and Other Disastrous Delights
In this episode, we dive into the various disasters that unfold throughout The Cassandra Crossing. From the initial release of a deadly virus on a train to the impending collapse of the titular bridge, the film keeps the stakes high and the tension palpable. And know that we say that you have to go into this movie ready for its not-so-great quality that makes it fun... at least to us. We discuss how the movie effectively captures the sense of paranoia and fear surrounding the spread of disease, a theme that resonates strongly within our series. Additionally, we explore the film's campy and over-the-top moments, such as the infamous scene involving a sneeze and a bowl of rice, which contribute to its overall entertainment value.
Exposing the Flaws and Celebrating the Fun
While we acknowledge some of the film's shortcomings, such as the reliance on stereotypes and the clunky exposition, we also celebrate the elements that make The Cassandra Crossing an enjoyable viewing experience for us. From the performances of the all-star cast to the violent final crash, the movie offers plenty of reasons to sit back and enjoy the ride. Again... be in the mood for it or it may not work for you as well as it did for us.
Other topics covered in this episode include:
• The impressive ensemble cast and their performances
• The film's commentary on government secrecy and the U.S. military's involvement in bioweapons research
• The effectiveness of the movie's score in heightening the suspense
• The role of Lee Strasberg and his character's surprising backstory... and expositionA Thrilling Journey Worth Taking
Despite its flaws, The Cassandra Crossing remains a perhaps junky but goofy-fun-if-you’re-in-the-right-mood example of the 1970s disaster film genre, delivering a thrilling and entertaining journey from start to finish. Its exploration of themes related to disease and paranoia, combined with its star-studded cast and grand-scale spectacle, make it a film worth discussing and revisiting. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. -
“The reason, Mr. Gashade, for the hunt is the kill.”
A Low-Budget Western from the Corman-Hellman-Nicholson TrioAfter impressing producer Roger Corman with their previous work, director Monte Hellman and actor Jack Nicholson presented him with a spec script, but Corman had a different idea. He proposed that they make two Westerns instead, giving them three weeks to shoot each film. Hellman and Nicholson agreed, and the result was a pair of existential Westerns – The Shooting and Ride in the Whirlwind – shot in 1965 in Utah. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue our 12-episode, 14th season-long Roger Corman series with a conversation about The Shooting, our second installment and member bonus episode.
Unraveling the Mysteries of The Shooting
In this episode, we delve into the enigmatic world of The Shooting, discussing the film's unique narrative structure and the questions it raises. We explore the mysterious characters, their motivations, and the shocking revelation at the end. The story follows a former bounty hunter turned miner who is hired by a woman to track down an unknown individual. As they embark on their journey, they are pursued by a menacing gunslinger clad in black. Throughout our conversation, we examine how the film's minimalistic approach and existential themes set it apart from traditional Westerns of the era.
The Corman Connection and the Film's Place in Cinema History
We discuss how The Shooting fits into the larger context of Roger Corman's productions and its significance in the careers of Monte Hellman and Jack Nicholson. The film's low-budget, experimental nature aligns with Corman's reputation for producing cost-effective, boundary-pushing cinema. We also explore how The Shooting, along with its companion piece, Ride in the Whirlwind, served as a precursor to the independent, counterculture-influenced films of the late 1960s and early 1970s.
A Divisive Film: Contrasting Opinions
While Andy enjoyed The Shooting, finding its fatalistic and existential themes compelling, Pete struggled to connect with the film. He found the experimental editing choices and the overall pacing to be challenging, making it a difficult watch for him. Despite their differing opinions, both hosts agree that the film's ambiguity and unconventional approach make it a unique entry in the Western genre.
Other Topics Covered in the Episode
The film's status as one of the first "acid Westerns"The symbolic and metaphorical elements woven throughout the narrativeThe effective use of the stark Utah landscape to convey isolation and despairStandout (?) performances from the cast, including Will Hutchins and Millie PerkinsA Thought-Provoking and Unconventional Western
While Andy appreciated The Shooting's ambiguity and haunting atmosphere, Pete ultimately deemed it a "Casablanca movie," alluding to the exchange between Rick and Ugarte in the classic film: "You despise me, don't you?" "If I gave you any thought, I probably would." Despite their contrasting views, both hosts agree that the film remains a testament to Corman’s passion for cranking out low budget films and giving experimenting filmmakers like Monte Hellman and Jack Nicholson the chance to play. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
New Glossary Term: Casablanca MovieWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.
-
“She doesn’t know it yet, but she’s hunting us.”
How a Virus Spreads Through LanguageThe 2008 Canadian horror film Pontypool, directed by Bruce McDonald and written by Tony Burgess, was inspired by Orson Welles' famous radio broadcast of War of the Worlds. Originally, Burgess envisioned the entire film as a radio play, with the main character Grant Mazzy reading the script accompanied only by a visual of the blue waveform. While this concept wasn't fully realized, it heavily influenced the confined, constrained storyline of the radio station employees trying to make sense of the outbreak consuming their small town. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Disease Films series with a conversation about Pontypool.
Dissecting the Viral Outbreak in Pontypool
One of the most intriguing aspects of Pontypool is how the horror unfolds through the limited perspective of the radio station employees. As Grant Mazzy, Sydney Briar, and Laurel-Ann Drummond receive increasingly disturbing reports from Ken Loney in the "Sunshine Chopper," the tension builds before the true nature of the viral outbreak is revealed. The film's unique approach to storytelling keeps the audience engaged, even when the explanation for the virus itself may seem a bit far-fetched.
Throughout our discussion, we explore the metaphorical implications of a virus that spreads through the English language. As a Canadian film, Pontypool seems to comment on the value of traditionalism and the French language in Ontario, while also critiquing the potentially damaging influence of American shock jock radio. The film's central conceit – that language itself can become contagious and dangerous – resonates even more strongly in today's era of social media and misinformation.
Other Highlights from Our Conversation
The wordplay and coincidences in Grant Mazzy's opening monologue, foreshadowing the importance of language in the storyThe debate over whether Grant Mazzy was infected by the virus at the end of the filmThe role of Dr. Mendez as the "book of the vampire," providing exposition and context for the outbreakThe powerful portrayal of Laurel-Ann's deterioration, offering a window into the effects of the virusPontypool may not be a perfect film, but its clever premise and thought-provoking themes make it a worthwhile entry in the Disease Films series. By confining the action to the radio station and relying on reports from outside, the movie creates a sense of claustrophobia and dread that keeps the audience engaged despite the sometimes flimsy explanation for the virus itself. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!
Film Sundries
Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdLearn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.
Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:
Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeSitting in the DarkJoin the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!
Here’s where you can find us around the internet:
The WebLetterboxdFacebookInstagramThreadsBlueskyYouTubeFlickchartPinterestPete AndyWhat are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!
You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.Or sign up for AUDIBLE. - Visa fler
