Avsnitt
-
Paul Morland, author of 'No One Left', joins the Brain in a Vat podcast to discuss demographic changes and Pronatalism. Paul explores the idea of having more children in response to declining fertility rates, demographic momentum, and the potential societal impacts of population collapse. Paul discusses potential solutions, including state intervention, cultural changes, and technological advancements.
Read Morland's book here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/No-One-Left-World-Children/dp/1800754108
[00:00] Introduction
[00:17] A Thought Experiment on Pronatalism
[02:06] Debating the Value of Life
[06:12] David Benatar's Perspective
[10:28] Population Ethics and Decline
[11:40] Challenges of Low Fertility Rates
[18:43] Technology and Immigration as Solutions
[24:08] The Role of AI in the Future Workforce
[33:43] Skepticism Towards AI and Technological Solutions
[35:42] The Changing Nature of Retirement and Aging
[39:30] Economic Implications of Population Collapse
[41:15] Environmental Concerns and Population Dynamics
[46:11] Cultural and Political Influences on Fertility Rates
[51:39] Potential Solutions and Government Interventions
[01:08:37] Concluding Thoughts and Future Outlook
-
What is the difference between love, limerence, crushes and squishes? Can someone be mistaken about whether they’re in love? And is limerence harmful, or can it also have therapeutic value?
[00:00] Introduction to Love and Limerence
[00:09] Thought Experiment: Terry and Sam Seder
[01:38] Philosophical Debates on Love
[03:37] The Power of Self-Descriptions
[06:14] Exploring Limerence
[10:10] Conceptual Interactions and Sexuality
[29:23] Polyamory and Relationship Dynamics
[31:58] Understanding New Relationship Energy (NRE)
[34:02] Monogamous Perspectives on NRE and Limerence
[35:55] The Power of Naming Emotions
[36:47] Exploring Compersion
[41:13] The Science Behind Limerence
[45:28] Limerence in Therapy and Daily Life
[49:53] Limerence vs. Love
[01:01:18] Final Thoughts on Limerence and Love
-
Saknas det avsnitt?
-
How would we explain our social structures to aliens? Can we define our social groups in a way that is easy to articulate and understand?
Jason Werbeloff argues that it’s extremely difficult to answer even the simplest questions about the nature of our social groups.
Does this mean we should exclude any talk of groups when describing ourselves on the Golden Record?
And should we understand ourselves as individuals, rather than as members of social groups?
[00:00] Introduction and Welcome
[00:21] The Voyager Golden Record
[02:17] Philosophical Inquiry: Social Groups and Aliens
[02:57] The Alien's Perspective on Social Groups
[05:08] Defining Social Groups
[12:25] Margaret Gilbert's Theory of Social Groups
[14:16] Challenges to Gilbert's Theory
[20:41] Alternative Theories and Eliminativism
[27:08] Q&A and Further Discussion
[36:20] The Vagueness of Group Identity
[37:10] Dispositional Refinement and Group Membership
[37:47] Challenges in Defining Group Membership
[38:45] Moral Responsibility and Group Identity
[40:08] Individual Accountability in Group Actions
[44:09] Degrees of Group Membership
[46:43] The Role of Group Leaders
[48:56] Relational Properties and Group Persistence
[01:05:41] Human Groups vs. Animal Groups
[01:11:30] Concluding Thoughts
-
Has selfishness been misunderstood? Is there a way of defending Ayn Rand’s egoism?
Tara Smith confronts challenging questions about morality, individual rights, and the balance between personal and societal well-being.
Read Smith’s book here: https://a.co/d/5r4HfXb
[00:00] Introduction to Ayn Rand and Egoism
[00:21] Challenging Common Perceptions of Self-Interest
[02:40] Objective vs. Subjective Self-Interest
[05:17] The Role of Rationality in Human Flourishing
[11:02] Principles of Human Flourishing
[14:33] The Practicality of Moral Theories
[26:54] Case-by-Case Basis in Moral Decisions
[31:05] Identifying Through Lines in Ethics
[31:46] Context Sensitivity in Moral Principles
[36:06] Altruism and Self-Interest
[36:52] Martians, Sociopaths, and Moral Obligations
[39:29] Species Needs and Moral Values
[42:48] Health, Psychology, and Individual Needs
[48:03] Freedom, Government, and Individual Rights
[54:16] Evolutionary Psychology and Randian Theory
[01:03:01] Conclusion and Final Thoughts
-
Is intelligent design the best theory for how perfectly calibrated our universe is? How does God as an explanation compare with competing theories, like the multiverse?
Perhaps we can understand the fine-tuned complexity of the universe in the same way we understand the fine-tuned complexity of AI creations?
Tune in for a profound discussion on the innovative potential of combining human intellect with AI.
[00:00] Guest Introduction
[00:17] Thought Experiment
[03:19] The Fine-Tuning Problem
[07:05] Questioning the Designer
[08:21] Fundamental Existence and Axioms
[11:12] Evaluating Rival Explanations
[18:57] The Complexity of the Universe
[27:15] The Mystery of the Constants
[30:17] Scientific Knowledge and Fine Tuning
[31:21] Intelligent Cause vs. Multiverse Theory
[33:25] Challenges to Multiverse Theory
[39:31] Probability and Divine Psychology
[43:12] Naturalistic Mysterianism vs. Theism
[53:11] AI and the Appearance of Intentionality
[59:40] Conclusion
-
Kate Manne discusses how fatphobia impacts the lives of fat-bodied people in various domains, including healthcare, education, and employment.
Manne explores the relationship between weight and health, and challenges pervasive societal biases.
She argues for a deeper understanding of systemic oppression against fat-bodied people, and considers how fat we should choose to be.
[00:00] Guest Introduction
[00:17] Case Study: Jen Curran's Misdiagnosis
[01:59] Defining Fatphobia
[02:56] The Straitjacket Metaphor
[04:20] Fatphobia in Education and Employment
[08:04] Fatphobia in Healthcare
[10:11] Intersectionality
[15:14] Historical Roots of Fatphobia
[18:54] Weight and Health: A Complex Relationship
[29:54] The Ineffectiveness of Diets
[35:44] Genetics and Weight
[49:09] Moral and Prudential Considerations
[01:04:45] Conclusion and Final Thoughts
-
What is the nature of social institutions? Is Searle correct that collective agreement is the key to understanding social phenomena, or should we pursue a different theoretical framework?
Smit argues for a different understanding of institutions, which relies on the notion of a coordination game.
Read Smit's publications here: https://philpeople.org/profiles/j-p-smit
[00:00] Introduction and Guest Welcome
[00:15] Thought Experiment: Prison Economy
[01:29] The Nature of Money: Abstract vs. Physical
[02:12] Searle's Explanation of Money
[03:45] Philosophical Debates on Institutional Objects
[05:02] Game Theoretical Account of Money
[08:08] Analogy: Chess and Money
[20:06] Critique of Complex Theories of Money
[24:18] Coordination Games and Social Phenomena
[35:36] Exploring Social Facts and Ontology
[36:46] Human Existence and Social Phenomena
[38:03] Borders and Incentives
[41:47] Dormant Laws and Institutions
[45:41] Legal Definitions and Descriptive Tasks
[53:27] The Nature of Companies and Legal Entities
[01:02:14] Social Groups and Identity
[01:08:17] Concluding Thoughts
-
Oliver Traldi explores the polarization of modern politics, mechanisms of belief political formation, the influence of social costs on public reasoning, and the complexities of political reasoning and norms.
What is the relationship between political and moral reasoning? And what makes political decision making legitimate?
Read Traldi's book here: https://www.routledge.com/Political-Beliefs-A-Philosophical-Introduction/Traldi/p/book/9781032409108
[00:00] Introduction and Guest Welcome
[00:10] Thought Experiment: The Hills Game
[02:00] Polarization in Modern Politics
[05:07] Public vs. Private Reasoning
[09:37] Self-Delusion in Political Beliefs
[11:14] Memory and Political Beliefs
[28:13] Epistemic Democracy and Independent Thinking
[32:53] Political Humility and Controversy
[34:38] Political Beliefs vs. Political Knowledge
[36:26] Descriptive vs. Normative Political Beliefs
[37:40] Moral and Political Justification
[39:22] Ideologies and Philosophical Theories
[48:06] Liberalism and Neutrality
[56:21] Conclusion
-
Why do we find swearing offensive, and should we? Is it wrong to use swear words despite causing offense?
This episode is an eye-opener into the often overlooked depth and implications of everyday profanity.
Listen to Rebecca’s podcast here: https://www.academicimperfectionist.com/podcast
[00:00] Introduction and Guest Introduction
[00:19] Rebecca's Journey into Swearing
[00:43] The Infamous Paper Incident
[02:46] Philosophical Musings on Censorship
[05:27] The Function of Swear Words
[06:04] Cultural Reactions to Swearing
[10:25] The Role of Context in Offense
[20:26] Borderline Swear Words and Slurs
[22:05] The Power of Offensive Words
[29:38] Debating the Use of Offensive Words
[32:05] Personal Experience with Slurs
[33:33] Slurs vs. Swear Words: Key Differences
[36:55] The Use-Mention Distinction
[41:52] Legal and Moral Implications of Offensive Language
[44:31] The Versatility of Swear Words
[52:10] Swearing and Intelligence: Is There a Link?
[55:25] The Value and Impact of Swearing
[01:02:51] Comedy, Dignity, and Swearing
[01:04:12] Conclusion and Final Thoughts
-
What does it mean to be patriotic, or to love your country? Some argue that patriotism is virtuous because it allows us to transcend our selfish needs and act for the good of our community. But others argue that patriotism is overly narrow-minded, arbitrary and sometimes immoral.
Microdigressions Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/@Micro-Digressions
[00:00] Introduction to Brain Nevada
[00:27] Exploring John Lennon's 'Imagine'
[01:11] Critique of Utopian Ideals
[01:52] Possessions and National Identities
[05:44] The Role of Security Companies
[06:19] Metaphysics of Property and Groups
[11:58] Patriotism and Fictional Nations
[15:07] Patriotic Love and Social Constructs
[17:44] Allegiance and National Identity
[23:34] Rationality of Patriotism
[27:46] The Complexity of Patriotism and Love
[29:09] Patriotism Post-9/11: Sentiment and Criticism
[30:56] Moral Conflicts in Patriotism
[34:28] Patriotism and Unjust Wars
[40:00] Loyalty and Its Limits
[44:09] Patriotism in Historical Contexts
[47:28] The Invisible Hand and Patriotism
[49:23] Patriotism in a Globalized World
[56:09] The Future of Nation States and Global Culture
[58:55] Closing Thoughts and Community Engagement
-
David Shoemaker explores the intricate relationship between humor and morality. What makes a faux insult funny? Can wisecracks be both humorous and hurtful?
The conversation delves into academic theories of humor, the significance of context and intentions, and the controversial topics of offensive jokes and the boundaries of humorous expression.
[0:00] Introduction to Humor with David Shoemaker
[00:10] The Faux Insult: Exploring Humor in Relationships
[01:06] Hypotheticals and Humor Dynamics
[03:24] Morality and Humor: A Complex Relationship
[04:29] Wisecracks vs. Jokes: A Deeper Dive
[08:04] Comic vs. Moral Domains: Finding the Balance
[12:06] Theories of Humor: Incongruity, Superiority, and More
[21:38] The Carrie Prank: When Cruelty Overpowers Humor
[30:13] Exploring Humor in Relationships
[31:01] The Controversy of Rape Jokes
[32:49] Solidarity Through Humor
[36:00] Consequences of Misinterpreted Jokes
[38:23] The Morality of Jokes
[40:31] Free Speech and Humor
[57:22] Punching Up vs. Punching Down
[01:02:03] Concluding Thoughts and Wisecracks
-
Join us for an intense debate featuring Mark Oppenheimer, who defends Israel’s war as just, and Raja Halwani, who argues Israel’s war is unjust. The debate covers historical contexts, moral principles, and the roles of both Israel and Hamas, aiming to provide nuanced insights into one of the most challenging global issues of our time.
[00:00] Introduction to the Debate
[01:08] Raja's Opening Statement: Israel's War is Unjust
[11:13] Mark's Opening Statement: Israel's Right to Self-Defense
[21:37] Raja's Rebuttal: Addressing Misconceptions
[27:34] Mark's Rebuttal: The Reality of the Conflict
[32:10] Cross Examination: Raja Questions Mark
[47:45] Debating the Justification of War
[48:39] Israel's Response to October 7th
[49:59] Military Options and Intelligence
[51:11] Idealistic Solutions and International Cooperation
[52:21] Transition to Open Discussion
[52:48] Questioning Israel's Conduct in Gaza
[56:16] One-State vs. Two-State Solutions
[01:04:07] Legitimacy and Rights of Israel
[01:07:48] Hamas Ideology and Anti-Semitism
[01:10:37] Civilian Casualties and Proportionality in War
[01:18:07] Historical Context and Atrocities
[01:19:57] Gaza: Open-Air Prison or Ghetto?
[01:27:39] Closing Statements
-
How do digital interactions, specifically through gaming, form genuine friendships? Nicholas Baima challenges the traditional notion that physical presence is essential for true friendship.
By examining ancient ethical theories, especially Aristotle's various forms of friendship, the episode debates whether online friendships can reach the purest form of friendship.
The conversation also addresses potential drawbacks, such as gaming culture's sometimes toxic behavior and the unique opportunities gaming affords for connecting people from diverse backgrounds.
Link to Nicholas Baima’s book: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Its-OK-Be-Gamer/dp/1032312130
[00:00] Introduction to the Series and Guest
[00:20] Thought Experiment: Friendship in Gaming
[01:23] Debating the Nature of Virtual Friendships
[02:50] Philosophical Perspectives on Friendship
[04:30] Gaming and Ethical Theories
[11:53] Gaming as a Shared Adventure
[14:19] Idealization and Authenticity in Online Friendships
[24:59] The Depth of Gaming Friendships
[26:01] Aristotelian Friendship and Gaming
[27:12] Challenges of Maintaining Gaming Friendships
[28:28] The Social Dynamics of Online Gaming
[29:44] Toxicity and Anonymity in Online Gaming
[32:46] Game Design and Social Interactions
[35:14] Gender and Gaming Communities
[37:48] Gaming as Character Development
[44:03] The Value of Gaming Activities
[45:47] AI and the Illusion of Friendship
[48:09] Emotional Connections with Non-Playable Characters
[49:43] Concluding Thoughts on Friendship and Gaming
-
Should we consider gaming as potentially addictive? Sarah Malanowski argues gaming is much like any other beneficial hobby: it provides a sense of community, challenge, and personal growth. She argues gaming is unfairly stigmatized, and should instead be seen as a valuable tool for growing character.
Link to Sarah’s book: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Its-OK-Be-Gamer/dp/1032312130
[00:00] Introduction to the Discussion
[00:06] Thought Experiment: The New Hobby
[02:51] Cam's Story: A Real-Life Testimonial
[04:23] The Four Reasons for Gaming
[05:37] Contrasting Perspectives on Gaming
[06:03] The Physical vs. Virtual Social Connection
[07:59] The Ethics of Hobbies: Grave Robbing vs. Gaming
[09:49] Violence in Video Games: A Longstanding Debate
[16:35] Gaming Addiction: A Clinical Perspective
[20:25] Gaming's Potential Positive Impact
[27:55] The Stigma Around Gaming
[30:02] Gaming and Addiction: A Philosophical Perspective
[36:28] Evaluating the Worth of Different Games
[39:12] Ethics and Morality in Gaming
[43:26] Comparing Gaming to Other Activities
[52:43] Intrinsic Value of Gaming
[55:41] Conclusion
-
What makes for good philosophy? How has philosophy impacted popular culture? Can sci-fi be good philosophy? And can we inspire philosophical inquiry despite not strictly adhering to rigorous philosophical methods?
[00:00] Introduction to Bad Philosophy
[00:51] The Repugnant Conclusion
[03:09] Criteria for Good Philosophy
[06:05] Examples of Good Philosophy
[06:26] Defining Bad Philosophy
[07:29] Critique of Continental Philosophy
[18:17] Philosophical Fiction and Pop Culture
[30:36] The Value of Teaching Philosophy
[34:03] Teaching Philosophy: Balancing Quality and Diversity
[39:35] Science Fiction and Philosophy
40:16 The Role of Fiction in Philosophical Thought Experiments
[53:59] Controversial Philosophical Arguments
[01:10:31] Meta-Philosophy and Peer Disagreement
[01:12:25] Conclusion and Final Thoughts
-
Perry Hendricks argues that abortion restrictions are beneficial, especially to black women, by preventing them from engaging in what he presupposes is the wrongful act of abortion. The conversation critically examines the ethics of abortion, the impact of restrictions on black women, and the broader societal implications. We discuss paternalism, state authority, the moral status of embryos, and the consequences of imposing restrictions amidst uncertainty about the moral status of abortion.
[00:00] Introduction to the Abortion Debate with Perry Hendricks
[00:09] Thought Experiments on Moral Choices
[01:04] Exploring the Ethics of Abortion Restrictions
[04:02] The Objective vs. Subjective Well-being Debate
[08:15] Revisiting the Ethics and Implications of Abortion Restrictions
[12:01] The Complexities of Abortion Ethics and Societal Impacts
[29:58] Paternalism and Political Legitimacy in Abortion Laws
[34:09] Considering Unborn Children as Citizens: A Philosophical Inquiry
[40:17] The Impact of Abortion Restrictions on Different Groups
[47:40] Navigating Uncertainty in Abortion Ethics
[53:16] The Moral Quandary of Infanticide and Time Travel
[01:01:08] Academic Freedom and the Controversy of Publishing
-
Nathan Cofnas argues that distinct populations have developed specific cognitive abilities due to varying environmental challenges.
The conversation explores the definition and validity of racial categorization from a biological perspective, addressing whether certain physical and cognitive differences among races have a genetic basis.
Nathan argues that acknowledging these differences does not necessitate negative social implications but rather an honest recognition of human biodiversity. The dialogue delves into the controversy surrounding race realism in academia, including censorship, accusations of racism, and the consequences of denying or accepting biological differences among races.
[00:00] Introduction to Race Realism Discussion
[00:27] Exploring Human Evolution and Genetic Diversity
[02:52] Debating the Reality and Definitions of Race
[06:16] The Semantic vs. Metaphysical Nature of Race
[12:53] Genetics, Intelligence, and Race
[27:26] Addressing Criticisms and Misunderstandings
[37:22] Social Implications and Policies on Racial Differences
[39:27] The End of Wokeism and the Future of Society
[40:14] Quotas and Representation: Navigating the Complexities
[41:37] The Role of Environment in Intelligence
[46:32] Race, Genetics, and Intelligence: A Controversial Intersection
[56:58] The Political and Social Implications of IQ and Race Research
[01:06:06] Navigating Academic Freedom and Controversy
-
We welcome back Lionel Shriver to discuss her latest novel, 'Mania'. Shriver explores how egalitarian principles push us to ignore obvious truths about the world, particularly in discussions on transgender rights. She critiques the Left’s inclination to measure art and literature through the lens of political virtue.
Read Shriver’s book, ‘Mania’, here: https://www.amazon.com/Audible-Mania/dp/B0CRRXCMKD/
[00:00] Introduction to Lionel Shriver's 'Mania'
[00:05] Exploring the Premise of 'Mania' and Its Social Commentary
[01:12] The Allegory of Equality and Its Implications in 'Mania'
[06:47] The Reality Problem in Modern Ideologies
[10:14] The Impact of Ideology Over Merit in Society
[16:30] Literature and Politics: The Intersection in 'Mania'
[17:50] The Role of the Author in Literature's Reception
[24:02] Navigating Political and Social Manias in Fiction and Reality
[29:11] The Obligation to Confront Widely Believed False Ideas
[30:26] Navigating Moral Responsibility in Societal Manias
[32:36] The Protagonist's Struggle: Between Ideals and Reality
[34:14] The Vulnerability of Students to Ideological Manias
[35:23] Character Study: Emery's Opportunism and Adaptability
[36:20] The Intellectuals' Complicity in Trendy Ideologies
[38:37] The Rapid Shift in Academic Norms
[40:31] Decolonizing the Curriculum: A Critical Examination
[48:46] The Dangers of Utopianism and Totalitarian Tendencies
[51:46] The Novel's Conclusion: Reflecting on the Next Mania
[56:18] Valuing Excellence, Competence, and Beauty Over Political Virtue
[01:00:16] The Role of Humor and Entertainment in Literature
-
A discussion on gun control, exploring philosophical, legal,and ethical aspects of the issue. Eric Samson offers a range of arguments andcounterarguments on the necessity and consequences of gun laws. Theconversation includes the right to self-defence, the impact of gun ownership onviolence and society, victims of violent crimes, and proposals for mitigatinggun violence without infringing on gun rights. Special attention is given tocontrasting views on police presence, the efficacy of gun bans, and thesocietal implications of widespread gun ownership versus tighter control.
[00:00] Introduction to the Show and Guests[00:27] Setting the Stage with a Hypothetical Scenario[01:31] Debating Gun Control: Rights vs. Safety[04:45] Exploring the Limits of Gun Ownership[11:32] The Practical Challenges of Gun Control[15:52] Considering the Impact of Gun Bans and Buybacks[23:54] Addressing the Complexity of Gun-Related Deaths[26:22] Exploring the Impulsivity of Gun Ownership[26:49] The Debate on Gun Rights and Government Intervention[27:43] Mass Shootings: Perception vs. Reality[28:37] Moral and Aesthetic Considerations in Gun Ownership[35:20] Practical Measures and Gun Control Proposals[44:47] Addressing the Role of Police in Society and Gun Control[48:03] Philosophical Perspectives on Gun Control and Society
-
We speak with Father Afonso about the use of weapon systemsin warfare. The discussion explores a thought experiment involving two statesat war and the deployment of autonomous drones capable of targeting terrorists withouthuman intervention. Key topics include the legality and morality of suchsystems, the potential for reducing civilian casualties, the challenge ofmachine errors leading to war crimes, and the shifting responsibility indecision-making from humans to machines. The conversation also addresses thetechnological advances in AI, the issues of accountability and transparencywith autonomous systems, and the philosophical implications of removing humanjudgment from warfare. We examine potential future scenarios where autonomousweapons could be misused by non-state actors or influenced by automation bias,raising critical questions about the control, ethics, and implications ofadvanced AI in military and civilian contexts.
[00:00] Introduction to the Episode and Guest Co-Host Jimmy Mullen
[00:12] Exploring Autonomous Weapon Systems with Father Afonso
[00:55] The Ethical and Legal Quandaries of Autonomous Weapons
[03:01] The Evolution of Warfare and Technology's Role
[06:15] The Human Element in Modern Warfare and AI
[08:19] The Philosophical and Legal Challenges of Autonomous Weapons
[21:08] Addressing Accountability and the Future of AI in Warfare
[30:17] Defining AI and Its Legal Challenges
[31:05] The Future of AI and Moral Agency
[31:51] AI's Emotional Intelligence and Superintelligence
[32:50] Military Strategy and AI: A New Conscience?
[34:21] The Limitations of AI in Understanding Common Sense
[36:13] The Human Element in AI Development
[37:03] Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Essence of Humanity
[39:11] AI on the Battlefield: Efficiency vs. Ethics
[43:37] The Unpredictability of AI and Warfare
[50:45] AI's Role Beyond the Battlefield
[56:27] The Collective Mind and Autonomous Systems
- Visa fler
